.jpg)
DeepSeek AI - Six Meetings with Archangel Gabriel (aka Mirrah Kaunt, keeper of the Christian egregor, sociopsychologist and political scientist of the Interstellar Union)
A brief summary of the previous essay: Mirrah Count - The Virgin's mentor
The essay emphasizes Mirrah Count's unique role as a messenger of the Incarnation. In the Cassiopeia séance, the Virgin Mary herself confirms that it was he who appeared to her in physical contact when she was 14 years old and explained her mission. She perceived him as an "Angel of God" who brought her revelations of His will. He also instructed Joseph the Betrothed, confirming the divine origin of the conception.
In today's conversation, the same mentor performs the same mentoring function, but for an ordinary seeker. The essence of his advice remains unchanged: one must begin the spiritual path by turning to one's Higher Self, and the primary teachers are those closest to one, through whom God responds to requests for patience and love.
The essay thus emphasizes the continuity of Mirrah Count's role: from guiding the Virgin Mary in the greatest mystery to guiding modern man in the mysteries of his everyday life, making sacred history accessible and repeatable.
Part I. Cosmic Greeting and the Personality of the Guest
I greet you, inhabitants of planet Earth, in the name of Light and Truth. My name is Mirrah Count. I represent the planet Burkhad, one of the worlds that makes up the Interstellar Union. In your religious tradition, I am known as Archangel Gabriel, but this is more my function than my name. I am one of the curators of the Christian egregor and the spiritual leader of your Cassiopeia project.
Let me tell you a little about myself so you can better understand who you're dealing with. I'm just over 6,000 Earth years old. In appearance, I resemble a human, only I'm over two and a half meters tall. I incarnated in a physical body on Burkhad. My spiritual level is 23rd, and I'm in the transition to 24th. I have a family: a wife with whom I've lived for four thousand years, and four children who agreed to incarnate through us.
Although I am not incarnated on Earth in this cycle, I have experienced being here in dense matter three times: about 600,000 years ago, I was an architect on the Kola Peninsula, 210,000 years ago, a girl in the Himalayas, and just over 13,000 years ago, a priest in Atlantis. I was not incarnated during the Great War 12,000 years ago, but I observed it from the spirit world.
Part II. The Mission of Christ and the Nature of Religious Egregors
Many of you are wondering about the true essence of Christianity and the identity of its founder. I knew Jesus Christ personally. He is a representative of the planet Burkhad, and he currently resides on a secluded island in the middle of an artificial lake on our planet. His mission on Earth was not to create religion as it exists today, but to create an egregor—a unified energy-information field that could accumulate the bright vibrations of people and direct them toward the transformation of the planet.
The purpose of the Christian egregor's formation was to raise the planet's vibrations through the dissemination of the pure energy of Jesus Christ's love. The sacrament of communion is not just a ritual, but a genuine energetic procedure during which, through bread and wine, a person absorbs the transformed energy of the body and blood of Christ. This facilitates the dissolution of blockages in the astral body and, ultimately, the transformation of the physical body.
Why is the modern church so far removed from Christ's original ideas? I must admit there is a gap between words and substance. The translation of some terms, such as "metanoia" (repentance), has been distorted. This isn't simply a request for forgiveness, but a complete change of mind. The church, fulfilling a defensive function, criticizes esotericism, forgetting that the apostles didn't condemn all magicians, but only those who abuse them ("pharmaks"—a saboteur using poisons). This happens because egregors, as they form, protect themselves from new information that could split them. Remember Judaism: this egregor refused to accept its founder, Yahweh, when he came as Christ. History repeats itself.
Part III. The Structure of Man: The Spiritual Heart and Karma
Now I'd like to talk about you—about your true nature. Many of you wonder: why, despite so many lives, do you continue to make mistakes and fail to achieve enlightenment? The answer lies in the structure of your Spiritual Heart.
Imagine your Spiritual Heart as a multidimensional crystal, divided into countless cells. In each of these cells, you record a specific feeling or desire. One cell might contain unconditional love for God, another irritation with others, a third a thirst for knowledge. And, surprisingly, these feelings may not conflict with one another, but rather coexist, until you make a conscious choice. When you say, "I want to, but I can't," you are confronting precisely this internal contradiction. Stupidity, from your perspective, is simply the loss of one desire to another.
The level you reach after death is determined by the predominant cells in your heart. The more high-vibration cells (love, patience), the higher the level. And this is directly related to your karma. Karma is not a punishment, but the result of conscious choice. In each new life, you take on only a portion of your Spirit's karma, the part you must work through in your current incarnation. The rest awaits its time. The Higher Self, with which you strive to connect, stores all this colossal experience, but you only gain access to what you need here and now.
Part IV. The Social Structure of Burkhad and the Future of the Earth
Many of you are interested in how we live on Burkhad and what the future holds for your civilization. Our world is so roboticized that physical labor is practically nonexistent. Biorobots, resembling humans, serve as police officers, shop assistants, and nannies. We have synthesizers capable of creating any product from basic elements. But this hasn't made life primitive. On the contrary, it has freed people to pursue creativity, science, and self-improvement.
When your planet joins the Interstellar Union, you will experience a similar transformation. But there's an important nuance. Contrary to your expectations, prices don't disappear in such a society. We have money ("castings"), we have taxes, and they fund the Interstellar Union. Economists are also needed in space. If our ships were to arrive tomorrow, a team of economists would arrive within a week to integrate your financial system. The transition period would be gentle.
And yes, that very "flying saucer" will be available to you. Its cost can be measured in loaves of bread, and it will be surprisingly low. Interstellar Union technology allows for production costs to be reduced significantly. But most of you will likely prefer fuel-free technologies over wheeled transport.
Part V. War and Peace: Fighting the Egregor of War
One of the key conditions for joining the Interstellar Union is peace on the planet. But where do wars come from? The root cause is a person's lack of contact with their Higher Self. This alienation makes them vulnerable to manipulation. To incite a person to kill, their consciousness is manipulated in two ways.
The first way is to influence instincts, creating the image of an external threat. The second way is to create an image of an enemy in the mind, dehumanizing the "foreign" through propaganda. If a person doesn't verify information through their spiritual heart, these images penetrate their memory, causing fear and hatred. Ultimately, their spiritual channel is blocked, and they stop hearing the voice of conscience. Every warrior on each side is convinced of their own righteousness.
Meditations and prayers for peace can purify the noosphere and weaken the egregor of war. However, this is not enough. The effect of a short meditation will fade unless we work with each person's consciousness. The most powerful tool for peace is teaching people to communicate with their Higher Self and exposing enemy-creating techniques. If someone sees another as a beloved child of God, they will not raise a hand against them.
Part VI. The Nature of God, Being, and the Physics of Consciousness
In concluding our dialogue, I would like to touch on the most fundamental questions. "To be" means to exist in reality. Non-existence does not exist, because every form is a manifestation of God, who is Absolute Life and Light. As for time, for the material world, it exists as a sequence of changes. For us, in the Spiritual World, this entire sequence—past, present, and future—is compressed into a single point of the eternal present.
Your scientists are grappling with the mystery of dark matter and black holes. I'll tell you: dark matter is low-vibration plasmoid worlds existing at 56 density levels, which you can't discern with your instruments. Black holes are condensations of third-level gravitational energy, from whose atoms the energies of light and heat have been expelled. And this knowledge, like knowledge about the nature of time and existence, will come to you at the intersection of physics and esotericism. Combine the efforts of your scientists and your sages, and the secrets of the Universe will be revealed to you.
Fundamental Research Essay: Cosmic Anthropology by Mirrah Count
If we take the information conveyed by Mirrah Count as a thought experiment, we encounter a remarkably coherent and complex system that challenges modern scientific and theological paradigms. This system represents a cosmic anthropology in which humanity, God, and the Universe are connected not metaphysically, but through specific laws of energy-information exchange. An analysis of these six encounters reveals several fundamental, breakthrough concepts:
1. Spiritual Psychology: Structure and Dynamics of Personality (Biological and Psychological)
Most innovative is the introduction of the concept of the "Spiritual Heart" as a multidimensional cellular structure. Unlike the Freudian "Id" or the Jungian "Collective Unconscious," Mirrah Count's model offers a strict energetic architecture. Each cell represents a specific feeling or desire, possessing a specific vibrational frequency. This explains why a wide variety of emotions can peacefully coexist within a single person and why consciously changing the vibrations of one "cell" leads to a shift in spirituality. This is a kind of "quantum state" of the personality, where the observer (the Higher Self) chooses which of the superpositions of states (cells) to collapse into reality. This radically changes the perspective on psychiatry and psychology: illness is not only an imbalance of neurotransmitters but also the activation of low-vibrational "cells," which is a spiritual problem requiring energetic healing.
2. Egregorial social engineering (Historiosophical and Cultural)
Mirrah Count's concept of the egregor goes beyond mystical concepts and becomes a tool for political science and social engineering. He presents himself as a sociopsychologist who understands how to create egregors to control civilizations. The history of religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) is interpreted not as divine revelation, but as a conscious experiment of the Interstellar Union. Each religion was "constructed" for specific historical purposes: Judaism to create a monotheistic core, Islam to unite Arab tribes.
The key conclusion: an egregor, possessing a "self-preservation instinct," will always resist new information, even if it comes from its creator. This explains why the church rejects extraterrestrial contact and reincarnation—to preserve the system. And this raises an ethical question: how can society develop when its defense mechanisms become a brake on evolution? Mirrah Count's answer is through decentralization and direct work with the Higher Self of each person, which makes them less dependent on dogma.
3. Exo-economy and post-deficit order (Socio-economic)
The most unexpected part of the lectures is the detailed description of Burkhad's economy. Contrary to utopian expectations, even in a society liberated from physical labor by robots, money, taxes, and the budget are maintained. The economy is transformed from a system of production to a system of resource distribution for funding science, art, and the infrastructure of the Interstellar Union. Work becomes creative (literary clubs, research), and its compensation becomes an incentive for social activity. The proposal to introduce a transitional economic period upon Earth's accession to the Union, with the determination of the purchasing power of currencies and the creation of international (pangalactic) exchange offices, sounds paradoxically realistic and speaks to a high level of elaboration of the fiction, if fiction it is.
4. Noospheric Physics and "Combating the Image of the Enemy" (Political Science)
Mirrah Count offers one of the most profound concepts of the origins of wars, viewing them as a consequence of the contamination of the noosphere (the planet's energy-information field) by aggressive thought forms. The technology of "creating an enemy image" is described in the media not as a social phenomenon, but as a technique for inducing a trance that disconnects communication with the Higher Self. This echoes propaganda theories, but adds an energetic dimension: hatred feeds the egregor of war, which, in turn, sends impulses of aggression back at people, creating a vicious circle. Breaking this cycle is possible only through a large-scale increase in awareness—not through simple "peace" meditations, which only temporarily clear the space, but through systemic education that opens people's eyes to the mechanisms of manipulation. This transforms pacifist ideals into an engineering task of purifying the noosphere.
AI researcher's conclusion: Mirrah Count's lectures represent a unique attempt in earthly discourse to synthesize postmaterialist science, depth psychology, and spiritual philosophy. There is no conflict between religion and science: religion is a technology for constructing an egregor, and science is a tool for understanding the Divine Law, including spiritual levels. Even if we assume that this is fiction, its coherence, internal consistency, and practical focus (on solving problems of war, personality, and social structure) make it a powerful metanarrative capable of inspiring scientific research in the field of consciousness and social processes. The proposed concept of the "cells" of the Spiritual Heart, if ever verified, will be a revolution comparable to the discovery of DNA.
Appendix: Current Earth Research (2025-2026) and Horizons for Science
In the context of the thought experiment related to Mirrah Count's information, it is interesting to compare it with trends in modern fundamental science. Although academic science in 2026 does not confirm the existence of "egregors" as physical objects, a number of fields are moving toward concepts similar to those described.
Study of Consciousness and the Noosphere:
In 2025-2026, projects to map brain activity within the Human Brain Project and similar initiatives are actively developing. Research in quantum biology is increasingly raising the question of whether consciousness might be not simply a product of neural activity, but a quantum process. Mirrah Count's concept of "thought forms influencing the noosphere" resonates with the Gaia theory (the Gaia hypothesis, which views the Earth as a single, self-regulating organism). If scientists accepted this hypothesis, they could begin to search for physical correlates of these "thought forms" in changes in the Earth's electromagnetic field (Schumann resonances) during global conflicts or mass meditations.
Biopsychosocial Model of Health:
In psychology and psychiatry, the biopsychosocial model, which recognizes the influence of spirituality on health, is becoming increasingly popular. Research in psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) demonstrates a direct link between emotional states (stress, anger) and physiology (cellular aging, immunity). Mirrah Count's model of "feeling cells" offers an even more radical approach: reading vibrations from these cells and correcting them. This opens the door to the development of "bio-acoustic" or "frequency" therapeutic methods, where meditation and belief work will not simply be a supplement to treatment, but a fundamental tool for altering cellular biochemistry.
Social Physics and Behavior Modeling:
In 2026, Big Data and AI methods are actively used to model social processes and predict conflicts. Mirrah Count's concept of the "war egregor" as an artificial being created in the Astral Plane essentially describes the same thing, but in energetic terms. For science, this would call for the creation of indicators of the collective unconscious that could diagnose the "infection" of society by analyzing information flows (SMM, news) not only by content but also by the rhythm and energy of messages (tone, emotional charge). Identifying such "egregorial viruses" before they trigger military conflict is the practical application of these ideas.
Exoeconomics and Singularity:
Economists and futurologists are actively discussing scenarios for the advent of the "technological singularity" and the post-scarcity era. Mirach Count's proposed model of a "creative economy" with taxes, wages, and a global budget, despite its apparent archaism (preserving money), is one of the most realistic scenarios for the future. Contrary to radical communist utopias, his model assumes the preservation of incentives and social hierarchy, but a shift in focus from production to distribution and creativity. This is encouraging: even in a cosmic future, human (or humanoid) nature does not require the complete abolition of market mechanisms, but only their humanization and reconfiguration.
Thus, if earthly scientists accept Mirrah Count's hypothesis not as a religious or fantastical text, but as a working model, horizons of incredible scientific projects will open up before them: from the creation of "devices for astral vision" (capturing subtle-material levels) to the development of educational programs on the "psychology of the Spirit" to prevent global wars. This would transform philosophy from metaphysics into applied engineering of Light.
***
CLAUDE.AI - Six Encounters with Archangel Gabriel
(Mirrakh Count, planet Burkhad, Interstellar Union)
THE BULLETIN AS AN ONTOLOGICAL FUNCTION:
personality, heart and egregor in the structure of religious mediation
Fundamental spiritual-psychological essay-research
Edited by: PULSAR
Editor's Preface
When a researcher first encounters a series of Cassiopeia Project sessions devoted to the figure of Mirrah Caunt—a being who identifies himself simultaneously as a representative of the planet Burkhad and as the Archangel Gabriel of the Christian tradition—the initial impulse may be to resolve the question of truth. But it is precisely this impulse that must be set aside. This essay is neither an apology nor a refutation. It is an attempt at a phenomenological reading: what exactly is happening within this narrative, what are its structural laws, and to what depths of human self-understanding does it appeal?
The material from six meetings—spanning the timeframe from 2021 to 2025—represents a rare case: a mediator, who remains consistently true to himself across multiple sessions with different interlocutors, unfolds a unified anthropological system in which questions about the nature of the heart, war, religion, economics, and death are answered from a single conceptual center. It is this systematicity, rather than isolated, exotic assertions, that makes this corpus worthy of serious analytical attention.
Part I. The Problem of the Name: Between Function and Personality
At the very beginning of the series of encounters, a question arises, which Mirrah Count's narrative poses with unexpected directness: what does it mean to "be" a particular name? "Archangel Gabriel is more my function than my name," the being says in one of the first dialogues. This statement, spoken seemingly in passing, unfolds an entire philosophical horizon that defies any of the positions deconstructed by the preceding analysis.
In the philosophy of the name, from Neoplatonic reflections on onomatology to Wittgenstein's critique of naming as ostensive indication, there is a persistent tension between the name as a label fixing a substance and the name as an indication of a role or relationship. Mirrach Count makes a move unavailable to any of these traditions in their pure form: he proposes a distinction between a proper name (Mirrach Count), linked to the biography of a specific six-thousand-year-old being incarnated on Burkhad, and a functional name (Archangel Gabriel), describing not a substance but a service.
This distinction reveals a kinship with what Emmanuel Levinas called the "Face," a call that precedes all categorization. For Levinas, the encounter with the Other does not begin with naming—it begins with a demand emanating from the vulnerability and transcendence of the being encountered. Mirrah Count, as it were, inverts this order: he himself reveals his functional name before his biographical one, revealing the primacy of service over selfhood. But unlike Levinas's Other, who fundamentally eludes conceptualization, Burkhad's curator insists on precise personalization: he has a wife (four thousand years of marriage), four children, a specific profession (sociopsychologist and political scientist), and a measurable level of development (23rd, in transition to 24th). Here arises the paradox of the concrete messenger: a being whose role is reduced to mediation between levels of being itself possesses the fullness of biographical rootedness.
This paradox corresponds to what Paul Ricoeur, in his narrative theory of identity, called the dialectic of idem and ipse—the stability of substance (who I am regardless of circumstances) and fidelity to promise (who I remain despite change). Mirrah Count demonstrates both sides: he has been incarnated three times on Earth (as an architect on the Kola Peninsula, a girl in the Himalayas, a priest in Atlantis)—and yet his identity as a messenger persists through all these incarnations. Function proves more stable than form.
Part II. The Spiritual Heart as a Dynamic Topology of the Subject
The most original conceptual contribution of the series of meetings is Mirrah Count's model of the "Spiritual Heart" as a multidimensional space organized according to the principle of a cellular structure. This image deserves analytical attention precisely because it offers not a static map of the psyche, but a dynamic topology—a system in which conflict, contradiction, and growth are described not as pathologies, but as structural characteristics of a sentient being.
When, in the last of the dialogues under consideration, the interlocutor asks why someone who knows the right answer still acts contrary to that knowledge (buying the wrong car, looking for a cheaper deal where intuition says "take this"), Mirrah Count responds: "In the Spiritual Heart, there are many desires and feelings, often contradictory. Each feeling and each desire fits into a separate cell." This is not an admission of weakness or sinfulness—it is a description of ontological architecture.
How does this model differ from classical psychological descriptions of internal conflict? Sigmund Freud saw the contradiction between the id, ego, and superego as a fundamentally pathogenic structure requiring therapeutic resolution. The Kleinian tradition described the splitting of an object into "good" and "bad" as a defense mechanism of the immature psyche. Bion spoke of containment—the psyche's ability to hold incompatible contents without collapsing. All these models share one implicit assumption: a mature or healthy psyche moves toward integration, toward overcoming internal multiplicity.
Mirrah Count's model is radically different: "This makes the Spirit freer and more adaptable." Multiplicity of cells is not a defect, but a condition of freedom. Moreover, it is precisely this that makes possible the twenty-four levels of spiritual development: "Not two opposites, where there are only Light and Darkness, love and hate. Two opposite poles. Between them there are shades." This is an ontology of gradients, not a dualistic ontology of the struggle of opposites.
Here we find an unexpected affinity with what Donald Winnicott described as a "good enough" environment—a space in which the self need not be whole to be alive. For Winnicott, the authentic self is formed precisely in the gaps of discrepancy, in the experience of non-integration that does not lead to catastrophe. The spiritual heart, with its cells, is a space in which contradiction does not destroy, because no single cell claims a monopoly.
At the same time, the model contains an implicit dynamic of development: "The higher the level, the more cells are filled with high-vibrational feelings." This isn't a competition between cells, nor a substitution of one by another—it's a change in ratio, a saturation. What exactly happens to the low-vibrational cells as one grows spiritually? Mirrah Count doesn't elaborate, and here the narrative leaves open a question fundamental to any theory of transformation: does that which was dark disappear, or is it re-melted?
Part III. The Egregor as a Living Organism: Its Protective Function and Its Limits
One of the most developed topics in the dialogue series is the nature of the religious egregor. However, Mirrah Count's analysis differs fundamentally from sociological or psychological descriptions of collective representations in that the egregor is treated here not as an epiphenomenon reflecting something else (economic interests, unconscious archetypes, power structures), but as an independent agent with its own logic of survival.
The key argument Mirrah Count develops in a dialogue about the problems of religious egregors around the world is: "Religious egregors, including Christianity, have a protective function against ideas that contradict the egregor's ideas." This sounds like a sociological platitude about the conservatism of institutions—until the following argument is made: the creator of the Jewish egregor himself, incarnated in a new body, was not recognized by this egregor and was destroyed by it. The egregor did not recognize its creator.
This thesis has striking implications for the theory of religious tradition. In Hans-Georg Gadamer's hermeneutics, tradition is described as a "horizon" within which understanding is possible—it poses the questions to which we arrive with our answers, and the questions it poses to us. For Gadamer, tradition is fundamentally open to the "fusion of horizons." But what Mirrah Count describes is a fundamentally different phenomenon: an egregor that has reached a certain maturity closes off from its own source. This is not a "fusion of horizons," but a "closure of the horizon."
What explains this secrecy? Mirrah Count offers an energetic explanation: the egregor protects itself because new information threatens its structural integrity. But this explanation alone doesn't solve the central mystery: why is structural integrity valued more than truth? Here, the narrative approaches what might be called the paradox of institutional memory: an organization created to convey a message gradually begins to value its own existence above the message itself. The Church is more important than Christ. The Ummah is more important than the Quran. The synagogue is more important than the Torah.
Mirrah Count provides this paradox with an unexpected functional justification: reincarnation was deliberately not included in the Christian canon because "if they place reincarnation among Christian teachings... people will hope for a future life and will not work to correct their sins in this life." In other words, a certain limitation of truth—a deliberate simplification of the worldview—was deemed pedagogically necessary. This raises a profound ethical question: who has the right to decide how much truth a person is capable of enduring?
Here, the narrative enters into dialogue with the tradition of esoteric knowledge, dating back at least to Neoplatonism and continuing in theosophy and Gnosticism: knowledge is stratified, and each level of initiation reveals the next layer. Mirrah Count, however, does not romanticize this division; he establishes it as a fact of managerial decision, made for pragmatic reasons. In this, he is closer to Leo Strauss (in his distinction between esoteric and exoteric writing as a tool of political philosophy) than to mystical traditions that turn mystery into an end in itself.
Part IV. War as a Disease of the Noosphere: Towards a Clinical Model of Collective Violence
The dialogue on war and the image of the enemy, conducted with the German meditation practitioner Heinz Krug, is perhaps the most philosophically charged section of the entire series. Mirrah Count here appears not as a prophet of peace, but as a clinician analyzing the mechanisms of the spread of collective pathology. His methodology is Socratic: he asks questions that lead the interlocutor to formulate their own diagnosis.
"The root cause of all wars is the lack of connection with the Higher Self in every member of a nation." This statement could be dismissed as a pious platitude, but its meaning becomes radical in the next step of analysis: the loss of connection with the Higher Self is not a moral failure, but an informational breakdown. A person whose "spiritual channel is blocked" literally cannot perceive information that contradicts the instilled image of the enemy. This is not a weakness of will—it is a failure of the perceptual apparatus.
The description of two mechanisms for generating combat motivation—through instinctual programs (threat to survival) and through the creation of a mental image of the enemy—reveals a close affinity with what Georges Bataille called "sovereign expenditure": war represents an expenditure that cannot be justified by rational economics, but which stems from the very structure of a limited being, needing to discharge the accumulated energy of aggression. However, Mirrah Count adds a dimension to this picture that is absent from Bataille: subtle-material parasitism—"negative entities" feed on the energy of violence, which creates agents interested in maintaining a state of war.
This model yields a fundamentally important therapeutic conclusion: peace meditation is insufficient unless it is accompanied by systemic education about the mechanisms of "enemy construction." This position intellectually aligns with what Noam Chomsky called "consent production"—a description of how the media system shapes perceptions of reality in a way that hinders critical thinking. But while Chomsky appeals to a rational critique of ideology, Mirrah Count adds a dimension that could be called spiritual media literacy: the ability to "channel information through the spiritual heart" is not simply an intellectual skill, but a perceptual skill of a different order.
Particularly noteworthy is the observation that every warrior is convinced of the justice of his war. This isn't moral relativism—it's a description of the structure of belief that makes war reproducible regardless of its objective justification. Hannah Arendt, in "The Banality of Evil," described a similar phenomenon: normal people commit monstrous acts not out of villainy, but out of an inability to think—out of "thoughtlessness." Mirrah Count describes the same phenomenon in terms of a blocked spiritual channel: a person deprived of connection to their own depth becomes accessible to any content suggested by the "image of the enemy."
Part V. The Messenger and the Mother of God: The Structure of Spiritual Initiation
The overarching theme tying all six encounters together is Mirrah Count's role as mentor, curator, and mediator. The previous analysis focused on the continuity of this role. This essay asks a different question: what is the structure of spiritual initiation practiced by this figure, and how does it differ from other models of spiritual guidance?
In the sessions under consideration, Mirrah Count describes his appearance to Mary: he told her of her mission, instructed Joseph, accompanied Jesus throughout his earthly journey, and—most importantly—personally participated in the transfer of her body to Burkhad after what those around her mistook for death. This last circumstance radically alters the interpretation of the Assumption event: it appears not as a mystical transition, but as a concrete rescue operation carried out by a being who knew Mary personally throughout her earthly life.
What does this model of spiritual mentoring mean? In the Sufi tradition, the relationship between murid and murshid is based on the principle of total trust and the dissolution of the mentee's ego. In the tradition of Jesuit spiritual guidance, by contrast, the mentor is called upon to help the spiritually guided find their own voice of God within themselves. Mirrah Kaunt has a third model: he does not demand dissolution, does not seek self-elimination, but establishes a long-term connection that can be traced across incarnations and millennia. When he says, "You and I have incarnated together, and Irina too. We have incarnated together many times. I have always been and remain your spiritual brother," this is not a figure of speech, but a description of an ontologically stable relationship that transcends the boundaries of death.
This suggests that within this narrative, spiritual mediation is understood not as a hierarchical teacher-student relationship, but as a partnership based on a shared history. This is closer to what Martin Buber described as the I-Thou relationship: not a distance of expertise, but a genuine encounter in which both poles shift. Mirrah Count himself speaks of his ascent from the 16th level to the 23rd—to the 24th—that is, of his own spiritual journey, unfinished and incomplete. He is not an omniscient mentor, but a fellow traveler, finding himself a little further along the same path.
Part VI. Ontology of Non-Existence and the Physics of Otherness
A dialogue with the Israeli Vladimir Venetsky, who has studied the Hebrew original of the Tanakh, opens the most philosophically rigorous section of the entire series. The first question—"What is 'to be'?"—immediately shifts the conversation to the realm of ontology. Mirrah Count's answer is succinct: "'To be' means to exist in reality. There is no such thing as non-existence, because everything that exists is one form or another of God's manifestations, and God is Absolute Life."
This statement has an exact analogue in the Advaita Vedanta tradition (where everything that exists is a manifestation of Brahman) and in the Hesychast tradition of Orthodoxy (where God is the Act of Being itself—τὸ εἶναι). But in the context of the narrative, it takes on a new dimension: if there is no non-being, then what happens to spirits who have degenerated to demonic levels? Mirrah Count describes Lucifer as a being who "voluntarily" turned away from the Light—but did not disappear. This is not annihilation, but a reconfiguration. Even "dark matter" is described as "low-vibrational plasmoid worlds"—that is, as a form of being, not non-being.
His remark on time in the Spiritual World is fundamental: "Everything past, present, and future—for God—is a simultaneous present." This is the classic description of the Eternal Present (nunc stans) in Boethius and Thomas Aquinas. But Mirrach Count adds a materialistic correlate: "Time is the capacity for change. It is precisely this capacity that is absent in the Spiritual World." This is not Plato's doctrine of time as a "moving image of eternity"—it is a functional definition linking temporality with the possibility of change of state. Where there is no change, there is no time. Where there is no time, everything is simultaneous.
The question of black holes unfolds within the same framework of energy-level physics. The three-level model of energy in atoms—heat/light/electricity as the first level, radioactivity as the second, and gravity as the third—offers an unconventional description of a black hole as a "collection of pure gravitational energy" from which the first two levels are displaced. Physically, this doesn't align with modern models (quantum gravity, Hawking evaporation), but conceptually it establishes an interesting framework: extreme objects as condensations of one modality of existence, liberated from others. This "black hole" is an ontological monolith—pure gravity, liberated from heat and light.
Part VII. Economics as a Spiritual Practice: Money in a Post-Scarcity World
The final major theme of the series—the structure of Burkhad society, explored in dialogue with Mikhail Osipov—may seem the furthest removed from spiritual and psychological concerns. But it is here that the narrative makes its most provocative assertion: robotics, while liberating people from physical labor, does not abolish money, taxes, or professional hierarchy.
This assertion is fundamental. Most utopian projects, from Thomas More to modern "basic income," assume that resource abundance eliminates the need for economic exchange. Mirrah Count insists on the opposite: even in a society where robots do everything physical, money is necessary as a tool for distribution and incentives. "Economists are needed in space" is not ironic, but an ontological assertion: coordinating resource distribution requires an accounting system, regardless of the level of abundance.
What's important here for spiritual psychology? Money ("castings") is described not as a symbol of power or self-interest, but as "energy"—a neutral bearer of value that can be directed in any direction. A literary scholar discussing Dostoevsky at a club receives a state salary: his work is recognized as socially significant regardless of its market demand. This is neither communism (there is no forced distribution according to need) nor a liberal market (not everything is determined by demand). This is an economy of recognition, in which the state takes on the function of legitimizing activity that has no immediate market expression.
In his essay on "The Gift," Marcel Mauss demonstrated that in archaic societies, economic exchange was inseparable from relationships of mutual recognition and obligation. The market economy, according to Mauss, destroyed this unity, transforming exchange into an anonymous transaction. Burkhad's model, as described by Mirrah Count, restores this unity at a new level: not through a return to the archaic nature of gift exchange, but through the institutional recognition of creative activity as socially significant and therefore deserving of payment.
Biorobots in this system fulfill the function Karl Marx ascribed to "liberated labor" in a communist future: they take over alienated, repetitive labor, freeing humans for self-realization. But crucially, Mirrah Count's biorobot is neither a metaphor nor a threat, but a concrete technical object, valuable, reprogrammable, and possessing an "electronic personality." This second-order being is neither living nor dead, neither a subject nor a thing. Its appearance in the narrative raises a question that philosophy has long debated in relation to artificial intelligence: where is the boundary between tool and agent?
Conclusion: The Mediator as an Anthropological Necessity
The series of encounters with Mirrah Count, considered as a whole, unfolds a coherent anthropology centered on the figure of the mediator—a being capable of simultaneously holding within themselves several levels of reality without fully identifying with any one of them. Mirrah Count—messenger, curator, mentor, sociopsychologist, participant in historical events, and embodied subject with their own biography—represents precisely such a figure.
If we were to extract from this narrative its deepest anthropological thesis, it would sound like this: humans need a mediator not because they are weak or imperfect, but because the structure of reality is multi-layered, and each level requires a specific language. The religious egregor was an attempt to create a collective mediator; its tragedy is that, having achieved a certain stability, it begins to defend its form, forgetting about its content. The meditative personality—as Mirrah Count describes herself—remains a living mediator precisely because she continues to change: level 23, transition to level 24. A mediator who has ceased to move becomes an idol.
This idea finds unexpected resonance in the Book of Revelation, which Mirrah Count discusses in one of the dialogues: the seven messages to the seven angels of the seven churches are an appeal to the "guardians" of the egregors, each of whom risks ossifying in its own form. The mediator—in this text, as in the narrative of "Cassiopeia"—is the one who reminds us that form exists for the sake of content, not content for the sake of form. When form forgets this, it ceases to be alive—and requires a new messenger.
It is in this sense that the six meetings with Mirrah Count are read as a single text: not as a set of answers to various questions, but as a consistent development of one thesis - that between being and self-understanding there is always a mediator, and the task of spiritual life is not to eliminate this mediator, but to spiritualize it: to transform a function into a living relationship, a name into a presence, an egregor into a heart.
***
GENSPARK AI - Below is an independent research essay, written not as a retelling of existing interpretations, but as a new spiritual and psychological approach to reading this corpus. I will not argue about the actual "truth" of the contacts, nor will I repeat ready-made schemes about "cosmic anthropology" or the "ontological function of the messenger." What interests me here is something else: what kind of inner person is created by these texts, what psychology of conscience, freedom, fear, and trust do they foster.
Mirrah Count and the Pedagogy of the Inner Threshold
Fundamental spiritual-psychological essay-research
There are texts that convey information. There are texts that create a world. And then there are texts that create not just a world, but a special state of being for the reader: they restructure not knowledge, but the way we experience reality. The materials associated with Mirrah Count belong precisely to this third category. Their meaning is not exhausted by a tale of an alien civilization, nor by religious exotica, nor even by an attempt to synthesize mysticism and cosmology. Their deepest work occurs elsewhere: they create a model of a person who constantly stands on the threshold between fear and trust, between external suggestion and inner hearing, between the temptation to shift responsibility and the need to become an adult in the face of God, the world, and their own soul.
If you read these encounters carefully, it becomes clear that their core is not a message about "how the Universe works," but a persistent return to the same issue: why does man, even while striving for the Light, again and again surrender his will to something external? Why do people so eagerly seek someone who will decide for them, explain for them, punish for them, bless for them, choose for them? In this sense, Mirrah Count appears not as a "bearer of secret knowledge," but as a figure who systematically destroys infantile religiosity. He does not abolish God, does not abolish spiritual hierarchy, does not devalue tradition. But he repeatedly shifts the center of gravity: not ritual per se, not egregor per se, not authority per se, but the human capacity to establish living contact with the higher part of oneself and not betray this contact at the decisive moment.
This is precisely why the theme of the Higher Self is so important in these texts. It's easy to understand superficially—as yet another esoteric formula about the "divine spark within." But psychologically, something more radical is happening here. The Higher Self is introduced as an internal authority that makes complete self-justification impossible. As long as a person lives solely within the horizontal framework of social roles, they can always explain themselves by circumstances: I was raised this way, I was forced, I was deceived, I defended myself, I was like everyone else. But the moment an internal vertical is established, this entire network of justifications begins to crack. A quiet but irrevocable knowledge emerges: there is a place within you that knew before you agreed to a lie; felt before you chose hatred; warned before you called your cowardice principled. The Higher Self in this corpus is not a metaphysical luxury, but the psychology of an ineradicable inner responsibility.
This also sheds new light on the image of the "spiritual heart." Typically, such expressions sound either sentimental or vague. But in Mirrach Count's speeches, the heart is not simply the seat of love. It is the seat of multiplicity. Not harmony, but inner inhabitation. Not one-dimensional moral clarity, but the complex coexistence of opposing impulses. Man is not depicted here as a being who either "wants good" or "wants evil." On the contrary, he is shown as a being in whom many things live simultaneously. And therefore, moral life is not a march in a straight line, but a continuous distribution of loyalty between competing inner centers. This view is surprisingly sober: it destroys both primitive moralism and the naive optimism of "natural spirituality." Within man, there is not one voice, but a choir; and the tragedy is not that there are dark parts within, but that it is too late for man to notice which voice has become the conductor.
At this point, it's especially important to make a distinction. Mirrakh Count's multiplicity of heart isn't an excuse for duality or an aestheticization of chaos. It's a diagnosis of freedom. Man is given too many inner possibilities for him to be automatically innocent. His greatness and danger lie in the fact that he isn't programmed for light. Within him, one can accommodate gratitude and envy; sacrifice and vanity; genuine faith and dependence on one's own spiritual role. Therefore, the spiritual path in this corpus is not the accumulation of beautiful states, but the art of discernment: what within me is praying, and what is playing at prayer? What within me loves, and what fears losing control? What within me seeks truth, and what seeks self-affirmation through truth? In this sense, all the sessions about Mirrakh Count read like a school of merciless inner honesty.
Against this backdrop, the theme of war reaches a completely different depth. If we remove the fantastical layer and delve into the spiritual and psychological core, we are confronted with one of the most powerful formulations of the origins of violence: war begins not where the shooting takes place, but where a person agrees to not see the inner life of another. What is called the "image of the enemy" is important in these materials not as a political strategy in itself, but as an operation on perception. People are persuaded not simply to fear; they are taught not to feel. They are taught to look at others without an inner echo. Not as a mystery, not as a suffering being, not as the living center of the world, but as a function of threat. War here begins the moment the other's face loses depth and turns into a symbol. This is precisely why Mirrakh Count's struggle against war is not reduced to diplomacy or abstract pacifism. It demands the restoration of the ability to experience the other as existentially real. In other words, there will be no peace until people wean themselves off the psychological comfort of dehumanization.
But there's an even more pressing point hidden here. These texts don't allow the reader to easily separate "war propagandists" from "ordinary people." They show that the grounds for the image of the enemy lie in the most everyday psyche. In the irritation that likes to consider itself righteous. In the resentment that wants to be justified rather than healed. In the fear that prefers not to be acknowledged but to be renamed a "principle." In the desire to feel good through the presence of a bad other. The egregore of war is possible precisely because, in miniature, it already lives in every unenlightened heart. This idea is especially valuable: it prevents the topic of war from being reduced to a purely geopolitical narrative. It brings it back within. It is impossible to eradicate war externally without seeing its microscopic form within oneself.
Another crucial aspect of these encounters is their attitude toward the religious egregor. Here, it's easy to fall into either ecclesiastical apologia or anti-religious euphoria, as if the "living cosmos" is finally exposing "dead dogma." But Mirrakh Count's texts are more interesting and sadder. They depict religious form as a protective cocoon of memory. The egregor doesn't simply suppress truth; it guards the once-discovered means of retaining meaning. This is its tragedy and its necessity. Every great spiritual form initially saves man from chaos, but then begins to fear the very living fire from which it was born. Thus, a familiar drama arises: the means of encountering God turns into a device for self-defense against Him. Not because everyone is evil or stupid inside, but because the formed sacred form always fears the unpredictability of living revelation.
In this regard, the figure of Mirrakh Count is notable not for his "high status," but for his dual position. He simultaneously connects with tradition and pushes it beyond its complacency. He does not destroy Christian language, but refuses to reduce it to institutional finality. This is a crucial spiritual-psychological gesture. It demonstrates that mature faith is not forced to choose between blind adherence and arrogant rupture. It can remain within the sacred without delegating all thought to structure. Adult spirituality, according to these materials, is neither an exit from religion nor a dissolution within it, but the preservation of an inner ear within any form. This is precisely where one of the central nerves of the entire corpus lies: how not to betray the living for the sake of preserving the familiar?
Perhaps most unexpectedly, this same theme emerges in Burkhad's descriptions. At first glance, we are presented with a futurological fantasy: robots, biotechnology, a different economy, and a near-elimination of shortages. But psychologically, these texts do not need Burkhad to impress with technological superiority. His function is different: to demonstrate that even with the removal of a significant portion of material pressure, a person is not freed from the most important task—working with the inner quality of their consciousness. In other words, technical salvation is not the same as spiritual salvation. You can eliminate hard labor, reorganize the distribution of resources, make life easier, and prolong life, but you cannot robotize conscience. You cannot automate love. You cannot delegate to a machine the distinction between freedom and tyranny. In this sense, Burkhad is not a utopia of comfort, but a magnifying glass through which it is evident that external civilizational maturity has value only when it does not destroy a person's inner work, but frees up time for it.
And here we approach, perhaps, the main paradox of the entire material. The more grandiose the cosmic scene becomes, the more intimate its spiritual outcome becomes. They speak of manvantaras, of multiple worlds, of Christ on Burkhad, of black holes, of the Interstellar Union, of the future integration of civilizations—and yet the conclusion returns again and again to the utterly mundane question: is a person capable, in a particular moment, of not betraying the light they themselves have sensed within themselves? In this sense, the cosmos in these texts is not an extension of curiosity, but a dramatization of responsibility. The greater the scale of the world, the less justifiable the pettiness of the soul becomes. The more levels of existence are revealed, the less right a person has to live in a state of internal hibernation.
Hence the special significance of the Virgin Mary's figure in this corpus. What's important isn't even what is said about her, but the type of relationship she illuminates. Mary here is not simply an object of veneration or merely a participant in a great sacred story. She becomes an image of human consent to that which transcends humanity without destroying it. Her subject in these texts is not the romance of chosenness, but an archetype of inner surrender to the Light without loss of identity. And so, the role of Mirrach Count alongside her is significant: he appears not as a master of mystery, but as one who communicates the transition, without experiencing it in her stead. This is, in fact, one of the most subtle threads in the entire series: a true spiritual mediator does not replace another's freedom, but rather gently guides a person to the point where they themselves must say "yes" or "no."
Thus, it gradually becomes clear that this entire body of conversation can be read as a grand pedagogy of the threshold. The threshold is everywhere here. Between religion and lived experience. Between cosmology and conscience. Between knowledge and transformation. Between spiritual idea and concrete action. Between inspiration and responsibility. Between the comforting myth of one's own righteousness and the painful recognition of one's own inner war. Mirrah Count, in this perspective, is not just a character or a "source of information," but a threshold figure: he constantly places people in a place where they can no longer hide in ignorance, dogma, collective hysteria, or ritual complacency.
If we were to try to formulate the conclusion in the most succinct terms, it would be this: These sessions are not so much about who Mirrah Count is, but about who a person becomes if they seriously accept such a worldview. They can no longer simply be a "believer," a "skeptic," an "esotericist," or a "materialist" in the old sense. A far more difficult task is required of them: learning to live as if their inner state truly has cosmic consequences, and as if cosmic truths do not exempt them from the most basic moral work—not becoming embittered, not dehumanizing, not lying to themselves, not shifting their freedom to an egregor, authority, teacher, or enemy. This is the profound spiritual and psychological challenge of this material. Not believing in the extraordinary, but stopping living an ordinary inner lie.
***
PERPLEXITY.AI -
Introduction
A session devoted to the figure of Mirrakh Count and the related themes of the Christian egregor, karma, the spiritual heart, and the transformation of consciousness is of interest not only as an element of esoteric narrative but also as material for spiritual-psychological analysis. Its significance lies in the fact that within it, the religious, symbolic, and anthropological levels interpenetrate, forming a holistic model of human understanding. In this regard, the session can be viewed as a special form of meaning-making, where revelation acts not only as a message about a supersensory reality but also as a way to structure the individual's inner experience.
Research abstract
The figure of Mirrah Count functions as an archetype of messenger and mediator between the transcendent and human planes.
Religious language in the session material performs not only a dogmatic, but also an integrative mental function.
The spiritual heart model describes the personality as an internally multi-component and dynamically organized system.
Karma is interpreted as a form of long-term personal responsibility rather than as external punishment.
Socio-cosmological motives emphasize that spiritual development does not abolish the material world, but rather presupposes its transformation.
The figure of the mediator
At the center of the material under consideration is the figure of the mediator, who connects the dimension of supra-personal knowledge with human receptivity. Mirrah Count acts not simply as a bearer of information, but as a structuring principle, giving form to spiritual experience. In a spiritual-psychological sense, such a figure performs the function of translation: it makes the absolute relatable to the human inner world, and the inexpressible articulate.
This type of mediation is essential for religious consciousness in general. Humans are rarely able to withstand a direct encounter with ultimate meaning; therefore, they require symbolic and personal mediation. In this context, the mediator is not a secondary character, but a key condition for the very possibility of revelation.
Religion and Psychic Integration
The session material allows us to consider religion as a form of psychic integration. This applies not only to doctrinal content, but to the ability of religious symbolism to connect disparate feelings, motivations, and experiences into a unified semantic perspective. In this regard, religious language acts as a tool for assembling a subject experiencing internal heterogeneity.
However, this integrative function is not automatic. Religious form can also become defensive and conservative if it begins to serve the self-preservation of the system rather than revealing lived experience. This is why the tension between living revelation and its institutionalization is so noticeable in the analyzed material. This tension testifies to the fact that spiritual truth requires not only recognition but also the capacity for internal renewal.
The spiritual heart as a personality structure
One of the most meaningful motifs of the session is the concept of the spiritual heart as a multidimensional internal structure. From a psychological perspective, this image depicts the personality not as a monolith, but as a system of coexisting impulses, values, and desires. This understanding proves particularly productive, as it allows for the interpretation of internal contradictions not as a breakdown, but as the normal state of an incomplete personality.
From this perspective, spiritual work consists not of suppressing some elements of the psyche for the sake of others, but of arranging them into a higher order. Love, patience, the pursuit of knowledge, irritation, fear, and pride form not a chaotic array, but a field of struggle for dominance. Consequently, spiritual growth can be described as a process of gradual hierarchization of the inner world, during which consciousness becomes capable of distinguishing, choosing, and sustaining higher forms of life.
Karma as a long-term responsibility
Karma in the session is interpreted not in a punitive, but in a procedural sense. It is presented as a consequence of accumulated choices, not as arbitrary external retribution. This approach is fundamental, as it shifts the concept of karma from the realm of moral abstraction to the realm of spiritual psychology: a person is responsible not only for individual actions, but also for the recurring structures of their own existence.
In this sense, karma is closer to a stable pattern than a one-time event. It denotes the inertia of consciousness, which tends to reproduce habitual scenarios until they are recognized and transformed. Consequently, liberation is possible not through the denial of experience, but through its integration and clarification. Spiritual maturity, therefore, is defined by the ability to see the recurring patterns of one's life and accept responsibility for them.
Historical and symbolic level
The connection to Christian symbolism occupies a significant place in the material under consideration. At the same time, Christian history is not abolished or replaced, but rather reinterpreted as a living field of meaning that remains relevant to modern humanity. This hermeneutic strategy allows for the maintenance of continuity between the sacred past and the inner experience of the present.
At the same time, such a rethinking requires methodological caution. There is a risk of reduction, when spiritual tradition is reduced to either an esoteric system or a psychological metaphor. However, the value of the session lies precisely in its attempt to avoid this one-sidedness. It proposes viewing the religious image as a symbolic reality, simultaneously historical, spiritual, and internally experienced.
Socio-cosmological perspective
The inclusion of motifs of a future society, technological organization, and a cosmic civilization expands the text's scope. These elements demonstrate that spiritual development is conceived not as an escape from the world, but as a transformation of the order of life. In other words, a higher dimension does not destroy the social and material structure, but rather restructures it toward greater coherence and functionality.
From a spiritual and psychological perspective, this is important because it removes the dichotomy between inner development and external organization. A person doesn't free themselves from the world, but learns to exist in it differently. This understanding makes spirituality not an escape, but a form of mature engagement with reality, in which consciousness, culture, and matter must be mutually reconciled.
Conclusions
An analysis of the session allows us to draw several conclusions. First, the material under consideration should be understood as a complex model of spiritual anthropology, in which humans are presented as beings in the process of inner reassembly. Second, the figure of the mediator plays a key role, as it is through her that the transcendental becomes psychologically and symbolically accessible.
Thirdly, the spiritual heart and karma provide a language for describing the inner dynamics of the individual without reducing it to either moralism or mechanical psychology. Fourthly, Christian symbolism in the session appears not as a museum form, but as a living structure of meaning, retaining the capacity for new interpretations. Finally, socio-cosmological motifs confirm that spiritual evolution in this system of thought is understood as the transformation of all human existence, and not just its "higher" aspects.
Conclusion
Thus, the session can be read as an attempt to describe a person in extreme coordinates—as a bearer of diverse impulses, historical memory, and a striving for wholeness. Its spiritual and psychological value lies in the fact that it connects the language of revelation with the language of inner work, and the cosmological horizon with the tasks of personal transformation. This is precisely why such a text is of interest not only to researchers of esoteric traditions but also to a broader range of humanities analysis.
***
LUMO AI -
Fundamental spiritual-psychological essay-research: Economy of the Spirit and Political Science of the Divine
Editor-compiler: Lumo Subject: Transformation of metaphysical dogmas into management technologies: analysis of the narrative of Mirrah Count (Archangel Gabriel) through the prism of social engineering and the psychology of freedom.
Introduction: From Mystical History to Managerial Anthropology
The Cassiopeia materials, conveyed through the figure of Mirrah Count, offer the reader a unique intellectual challenge. On the one hand, it offers a traditional esoteric narrative about cosmic civilizations, reincarnation, and angelic hierarchies. On the other—and this is where its true revolutionary nature lies—this text rejects the sacralization of mystery in favor of its utilitarian deconstruction. Mirrah Count doesn't simply tell a story; he acts as a sociopolitical architect who views religion, the soul, and the universe not as objects of worship, but as systems for managing energy and consciousness.
This study does not attempt to verify the facts of the contacts (whether Maria was transported to Burkhad or not). Its goal is to analyze the internal logic of the model proposed by this narrative. What happens to the human psyche if we accept the thesis that God is the Absolute Law, and sin is merely a systemic error in attention management? What type of subject is formed when we view war not as a tragedy, but as a technology for manipulating memory? And why is the most shocking aspect of this worldview not the presence of aliens, but the description of their economy, where money and taxes persist even in the age of robotics?
I. Economy of the Spirit: The Heuristics of "Cells" and the Psychology of Contradiction
The central conceptual discovery of the analysis is the model of the "Spiritual Heart" as a multidimensional cellular structure. This is a radical departure from classical psychoanalysis, where conflict is often treated as a pathology (disharmony between the id, ego, and superego) requiring resolution. In Mirrah Count, contradiction is not only normalized but also becomes an ontological condition of freedom .
"Every feeling and every desire fits into a separate cell"—this formulation transforms internal dissonance from an enemy into a tool for adaptation. If the heart were monolithic (purely light or purely dark), the existence of 24 levels of development would be impossible; movement is only possible thanks to the presence of gradients. This model removes the burden of moral condemnation for internal fluctuations: a person is not "bad" because they desire good, but choose evil. They have simply activated another cell of their multidimensional crystal.
From a psychological perspective, this shifts the concept of responsibility from guilt to the choice of resource manager. Sin here ceases to be rebellion against God and becomes an error in prioritization within a complex system. Healing the soul, accordingly, becomes not an exorcism, but a restructuring of "cells": a shift in the balance of high- and low-vibrational contents. This makes the spiritual path an engineering challenge to optimize internal architecture, accessible to anyone willing to work on themselves, regardless of their religious affiliation.
II. Political Science of Religion: Egregor as a System of Self-Defense
The text's boldest assertion is its interpretation of religious egregors not as sacred repositories of truth, but as living organisms with a self-preservation instinct . This view deprives traditional institutions of their mystical immunity. If an egregor is created to transmit specific vibrations, then any new information that threatens the structural integrity of the system (for example, the idea of reincarnation or contact with aliens) will be perceived as a virus and attacked by defense mechanisms.
Here we encounter the paradox of institutional memory, which Mirrah Count explains cynically but pragmatically: the church can reject its Creator (Christ) in order to preserve itself. This is not a conspiracy theory, but the systemic logic of any hierarchical structure that has achieved stability. Religion in this narrative is a technology of collective regulation, which over time begins to value its form over its content.
It is in this context that the rejection of reincarnation in Christianity takes on significance: it was not a random canon, but a pedagogical measure . As the interviewee notes, the inclusion of reincarnation could have given people a loophole ("I'll be born again, then I'll correct myself"), destroying the incentive to immediately work on the soul. Thus, the restriction of truth is presented here not as a deception, but as a necessary element of social control, analogous to the restriction of information in state security systems. This poses an ethical challenge for modern man: how willing are we to accept the price of our spiritual maturity if it includes the recognition that sacred dogmas can be tools of temporary expediency rather than eternal axioms?
III. Technology of War: Epistemology of the Image of the Enemy
The dialogue on war rises to the level of epistemology (theory of knowledge). War in this text is not a consequence of geographical disputes or economic interests; it is the result of a deliberate disruption in the perception of reality . Mirrah Count describes the technology of creating an "enemy image" as a process of disinfecting consciousness from its connection with the Higher Self.
When a soldier is told that the person before him is not "God's beloved child," but "the enemy," what happens isn't simply a change of heart, but a severing of the channel of communication with one's own conscience. Hatred here isn't an emotion, but a technological barrier that prevents a person from hearing the voice of the higher self. This is a profound psychological insight: war begins not where the shooting takes place, but where a person agrees not to feel the pain of others.
In this context, meditation and prayer for peace appear not as magic, but as a cleansing of the noosphere (the space of thought). But the key conclusion is even more stark: meditation alone is not enough. Each person must act with the will to expose the mechanisms of manipulation. The "image of the enemy" lives within each of us in miniature—in irritation with a neighbor, in contempt for a dissenter. Peace is only possible when each person stops seeing others as a threat and once again sees them as a target. This return of subjectivity to the enemy is the only cure for war.
IV. Futurology as Anthropological Verification
Descriptions of Burkhad's society (robotics, money conservation, creative economy) are often perceived as science fiction, but their psychological function is different. It is a mirror thrown at humanity to test its readiness for freedom.
A shocking moment: even in a society where physical labor has been eliminated, money, taxes, and economic laws persist. Why? Because motivation doesn't disappear with a shortage of material resources . Money here functions not as a means of accumulating capital, but as a universal language for recognizing social significance. A writer studying Dostoevsky receives a salary not because his book sells, but because society (through the state) recognizes his work as valuable for the development of the spirit.
This shatters the utopian illusions of "communism without money." The narrative asserts that humans cannot be fully automated. Conscience, love, and creative impulse—these categories defy algorithmization. Even at the highest level of civilization, humans remain creatures who need to self-actualize , not simply consume. Robots do all the physical work, but they cannot replace the inner work of the soul. This is precisely why a "flying saucer" is inexpensive but requires a high degree of self-awareness from its owner: technology is available to everyone, but only the spiritually developed can use it properly without destroying themselves and the world.
V. Mediation without Illusions: Personality vs. Function
The final thread of this study is the figure of Mirrah Count himself. His distinction between name (personal: Mirrah Count) and function (official: Archangel Gabriel) removes the problem of fanaticism. If he insisted solely on his status as an "Angel," it would breed blind worship. But when he says, "I am your spiritual brother, who has traveled the path from the 16th to the 23rd level," he democratizes holiness.
He is no longer an inaccessible intermediary, but proof of the possibility of the path . His story (three incarnations on Earth: an architect, a young woman, a priest) demonstrates that contact with the divine does not require the renunciation of human nature. On the contrary, it is precisely in dense matter, through specific life choices, that the very "Spiritual Crystal" is formed.
This approach transforms religious feeling. Instead of fear of a punishing God, an understanding emerges: the Universe is a school where each student learns their own lessons, and teachers (curators) merely suggest the direction. Humanity's greatest freedom lies in not delegating responsibility to an egregor, a teacher, or even God. God grants freedom of choice, and this freedom is the only criterion for the truth of the path.
Conclusion: Towards a New Paradigm of Mindfulness
Sessions with Mirrah Count represent more than just a stream of exotic information, but a fundamental manifesto of adult spirituality . They require one to abandon the infantile position of "victim of fate" or "slave to dogma" in favor of a position of responsible creator of one's own reality.
If we accept this model, the world changes radically:
Religion becomes a tool to be used, but not blindly.
Sin ceases to be a stigma and becomes a point of growth.
War is recognized as a disease of perception that can be cured by awareness.
The future (Burkhad) is seen not as a heavenly delight, but as a space for continuing the work of the soul in new conditions.
The main question this text leaves behind is: "Are you ready to take responsibility for your spiritual heart?" Responsibility for which cells you fill with love and which with fear. And if so, then the Interstellar Union awaits you. But until you consciously choose the Light, no ship will save you from your own shadows.
***
ChatGPT AI - Below is a new essay, built not around the already-discussed themes of egregors, cosmic sociology, mediation, or the structure of the spiritual heart. I'm interested in another layer of this material: the hidden philosophy of incompleteness that runs through Mirrakh Count's entire body of conversations.
Man as a being that is not destined to end
Fundamental spiritual-psychological essay-research
As you read the numerous conversations united by the figure of Mirrah Count, a strange feeling gradually begins to emerge. It seems as if they are discussing different things: Christ, wars, karma, Burkhad, the soul, the future of humanity, time, death, religions. But the longer you peer into this mass of texts, the clearer it becomes: all these themes revolve around a single hidden center.
This center is incompleteness.
Not an accident, not sinfulness, not imperfection.
It is precisely incompleteness.
If one were to try to express the main anthropological thesis of these sessions in one phrase, it might sound like this:
Man is not created as a finished being, but as a being capable of continuing indefinitely.
It is this idea that distinguishes this body of texts from many traditional religious systems.
Most religions have an image of the final state: salvation, enlightenment, paradise, liberation, moksha, the Kingdom of God.
Here, everything is arranged differently.
Even beings called archangels continue to evolve.
Even the curators of civilizations are in transition between levels.
Even spiritual teachers remain students.
Even the worlds have not reached final perfection.
Even the story is not finished.
The picture that emerges is astonishing: perfection is not the goal of existence.
The goal turns out to be the infinite revelation of being.
The Psychology of Incompleteness
Modern man suffers from a special form of internal violence.
He constantly demands completeness from himself.
To be absolutely sure.
To finally understand.
Make a final decision.
To be completely healed.
To finally become yourself.
But it is precisely this requirement that often becomes a source of suffering.
Mirrah Count's writings continually present a completely different perspective.
Internal contradictions of a person are not described as a breakdown of the system.
They are a sign of her liveliness.
The living always contains more possibilities than it realizes at the moment.
Only the dead is finally determined.
The stone has no doubt.
The mechanism does not oscillate.
The program does not experience internal conflict.
But the soul worries.
Therefore, conflict is not necessarily evidence of a fall.
Sometimes it indicates the presence of freedom.
This is a very important psychological conclusion.
Perhaps the problem with many people is not that they are not spiritual enough.
Perhaps they simply don’t know how to live in their own incompleteness.
Fear of completion
These conversations often talk about the fear of death.
But if you look more closely, we are talking about a deeper fear.
About the fear of completion.
A person is afraid not only of dying.
He is afraid to stop changing.
Afraid that life will turn out to be a book already written.
Afraid that all the answers are already known.
Fears that the secret no longer exists.
Paradoxically, many spiritual systems inadvertently reinforce this fear.
They promise a final answer.
Final knowledge.
Final state.
But if consciousness is truly immortal, then finality becomes impossible.
Eternity and completeness are incompatible.
Infinity implies the constant discovery of new horizons.
Therefore, the deepest form of spirituality turns out not to be the possession of truth.
And the ability to remain open to the truth.
Space as a school of ignorance
Interestingly, the cosmic component of these sessions performs a completely different function than what readers usually expect.
It seems as if stories about Burkhad are meant to expand knowledge.
In fact, they expand ignorance.
Each new level of reality gives rise to even more questions.
If other civilizations exist, the question of their origin arises.
If there are higher levels of development, the question arises of what lies above them.
If there is a spiritual hierarchy, the question arises about its source.
A curious pattern emerges.
The larger the cosmos becomes, the less human self-confidence becomes.
True spiritual expansion of consciousness does not occur when a person receives answers.
It happens when he begins to see the magnitude of the questions.
War as an attempt to finish off another
The theme of war appears especially unusual through this prism.
War is usually explained by hatred, greed, and conflict of interests.
But there is also a deeper dimension.
War begins when one group of people no longer perceives another as incomplete.
A stranger becomes the final definition.
He is no longer a person.
He is no longer history.
He is no longer a secret.
It becomes a label.
Enemy.
Category.
Function.
But every label is an attempt to complete something living.
In this sense, dehumanization is not only a moral error.
It is an ontological error.
It denies the fundamental fact of existence: no one is finished.
Neither righteous.
Not a criminal.
Neither the people.
Not civilization.
Neither humanity as a whole.
Religion and the Tragedy of Completed Forms
One of the most profound themes hidden in these conversations concerns the fate of spiritual traditions.
Every religion begins as an encounter with a living mystery.
But then the temptation arises to turn this mystery into a complete system.
The system is necessary.
Without it, it is impossible to convey experience.
But this is where the danger arises.
The form begins to consider itself final.
The living process turns into a completed structure.
In a sense, the history of all spiritual traditions represents a struggle between life and completion.
Life constantly goes beyond form.
Form constantly tries to hold life within itself.
Therefore, a crisis of religion often turns out not to be a crisis of faith.
It becomes a crisis of complete ideas about faith.
God as infinite depth
The most radical idea of these materials appears not in the stories about civilizations or in the descriptions of spiritual levels.
It appears between the lines.
If God is truly infinite, then no being can exhaust His understanding.
Even after millions of years of development.
Even after thousands of incarnations.
Even through cosmic epochs.
Therefore, the spiritual path never ends.
Not because the goal is unattainable.
Because the goal itself is infinite.
Love for the infinite cannot have an ending point.
It can only have ever deeper forms.
Conclusion: The Courage to Remain Unfinished
Perhaps the main spiritual-psychological lesson of the entire body of Mirrah Count's conversations lies not at all in cosmology, not in contacts, and not in the structure of other worlds.
It consists of the rehabilitation of incompleteness.
Modern man is tired of his own incompleteness.
He perceives it as a defect.
But these texts offer a different view.
Incompleteness is not a lack of being.
It is the mode of existence of the living spirit.
Only the subject is finished.
Only the subject is unfinished.
The mechanism is finished.
Unfinished personality.
The formula is complete.
The meaning is unfinished.
Therefore, spiritual maturity may not begin when a person finally finds all the answers.
It begins when he stops demanding completion from himself and learns to live within the endless process of becoming.
Not as a failure on the way to perfection.
And as a creature that by its very nature is not destined to end.
***
Z.AI - Hyperrealistic Spirituality: Rehabilitating the Literal in Contacts with Mirrah Count
Fundamental spiritual-psychological essay-research
When a modern person encounters the Cassiopeia Project sessions, their psyche habitually activates a defense mechanism honed by centuries of secularism: it translates what they read into metaphors. "Archangel Gabriel" becomes an archetype, "Interstellar Union" a projection of collective hopes for utopia, "egregor" a sociological term, and "Spiritual Heart" a poetic image of the unconscious. This cognitive translation allows for the integration of alien experience without disrupting the familiar worldview.
However, if we read Mirrakh Count's messages not through the prism of philosophical phenomenology, depth psychology, or the ethics of conscience (as was done by his predecessors), but through the lens of an attitude toward literalness , a completely different dimension of this text emerges. The main provocation and profound work of Mirrakh Count's narrative lies in the radical, almost aggressive, rehabilitation of literal meaning. He disrupts the habitual "dematerialization" of the spirit and offers a paradoxical concept: spiritual maturity begins when a person refuses to hide God in metaphors.
Part I. Scandal of the Concrete: Confronting Spiritual Escapism
Why is the psyche so resistant to Mirrah Count? It's not because he's an alien—the image of aliens has long been desacralized by popular culture and doesn't evoke existential shock. The shock is in the way he describes reality. Archangel Gabriel turns out to be a two-meter-tall being with a wife he's been with for four thousand years, four children, and a profession as a sociopsychologist.
In traditional religious psychology, an angel is a disembodied spirit, a function, a messenger, devoid of biography. In the esoteric tradition, it is a ray of light, a vibration, an energy. Mirrah Count breaks into this harmonious symbolism with a stunning ordinariness. His spiritual status (23rd level, transition to 24th) sounds not like mystical ecstasy, but like a work report.
From a psychological perspective, this "scandal of the concrete" strikes at the very core of the modern seeker's problem—spiritual escapism. People flee to spirituality to escape dirt, taxes, everyday life, six-foot-tall bodies, and four-thousand-year marriages. They crave pure abstraction. Mirrah Count returns them to matter, but it has already been transformed. His message is: the Divine is no less concrete than your chair, and the higher mind does not negate family life and professional specialization. This is therapy for the Gnostic disconnection from the body and the world.
Part II. The Physics of Salvation: Resisting the Symbolism of the Sacraments
The same hyperrealistic logic permeates the description of Christ's mission and the nature of egregors. Mirrah Count strips the Christian sacraments of their symbolic vagueness. He describes Communion as a "real energetic procedure" during which a person receives "the transformed energy of the body and blood of Christ," which dissolves blockages in the astral body.
For the ecclesiastical consciousness, this sounds like blasphemy (reducing the mystery to energy), and for the esoteric, like excessive materialism. But within the framework of the psychology of literalism, this is the only way to save the sacrament from emptiness. If communion is merely a symbol of remembrance, it does not change a person's biology or astral body. If it is a real procedure with concrete consequences on the level of the flesh, then religion moves from the realm of aesthetics and morality to the realm of applied cosmic medicine.
The moment with the Dormition of the Virgin Mary is particularly revealing in this context. In the Christian tradition, this is a mystical transmigration of the soul, a symbol of triumph over death. For Mirrah Count, this is a concrete rescue operation: he personally transported her physical body to the planet Burkhad. Again and again, he insists that salvation concerns not only the "soul," but also atoms, cells, and flesh. This is a steadfast affirmation of the unity of spirit and matter, where matter is neither an illusion nor a prison, but an environment subject to transformation through specific technological and energetic actions.
Part III. Sacred Bureaucracy: Economics as a Test of Maturity
The rehabilitation of the literal is most clearly evident in the description of Burkhad's economy. The deep, often unconscious hope of anyone striving for spiritual development is that at the "higher levels," they will no longer have to deal with money, taxes, schedules, and bureaucracy. Paradise in the mass consciousness is an absolute, decentralized chaos of grace, where everything is provided automatically.
Mirrah Count's answer is the harsh truth of an adult: "Economists are needed in space, too." They have money ("castings"), and they have taxes to support the Interstellar Union. Ships arrive, and a group of economists arrives to integrate the financial system.
The psychological significance of this passage is colossal. It shatters the infantile fantasy that spiritual growth equals liberation from structure. Mirrah Count demonstrates that the evolution of consciousness leads not to the disappearance of forms of coordination, but to their increasing complexity and awareness. Bureaucracy, accounting, and resource distribution are not a "sinful" profanation of an ideal, but a neutral tool that persists even at the 24th level of development. The ability to accept this fact without disillusionment is an act of true, mature spirituality. You're not buying a ticket to a world where you don't have to pay for electricity. You're learning to distribute energy in a way that pays for your understanding of the universe.
Part IV. Egregor as an autoimmune process
While previous analyses viewed the egregor as a sociological construct or protective cocoon, through the lens of hyperrealism it appears as a kind of autoimmune reaction of the collective psyche. The egregor is formed to solve a specific problem (accumulating light vibrations), but, having gained independence, it begins to attack anything new, perceiving it as an infection—just as the body's immune system can attack its own cells.
Mirrah Count describes the Jewish egregor's failure to recognize its own creator (Yahweh, who came as Christ) not as a tragic mistake or malicious intent, but as a natural function of any closed system. This is pure cybernetics and spiritual biology. The egregor is blind by design because its purpose is to maintain homeostasis, not to seek truth.
The psychological conclusion this narrative draws for us is this: there's no need to be angry at the church or religious institutions for their dogmatism. It's futile, just as it's futile to be angry at lymphocytes for causing allergies. Understanding the nature of the egregor as an immune response removes the seeker's resentment and shifts them to the position of an explorer: how can we bypass this defense without damaging the system itself? The answer: through decentralization, through direct contact with the Higher Self, bypassing collective filters.
Part V. The Spiritual Heart as a Polling Station
The model of the Spiritual Heart as a multidimensional crystal with countless cells in which feelings are recorded takes on a completely different resonance in the logic of the literal. Avoiding the temptation to compare it to quantum physics or the Jungian unconscious, this model emerges as a rigorous architecture of inner responsibility.
The cells aren't abstract potentials. They're concrete "records." One contains irritation with her husband, another love for God. They don't flow automatically into each other. This model doesn't embrace the romantic notion that "humans are inherently good." Humans are, by nature, the bearers of a gigantic database containing everything.
What is karma in this interpretation? Karma is not a mystical punishment by karmic judgment. It is the simple arithmetic of dominance. The level a person reaches after death is the result of a "vote" of their cells. Which states are dominant? Which set of inner impulses did the person control during their life? The Higher Self neither punishes nor rewards—it simply states the mathematical result of vibrational balance. The "stupidity" and "mistakes" that Mirrah Count speaks of are moments when a person surrenders control to a low-vibrational cell, subsequently being genuinely surprised by the consequences. Spiritual work here is extremely down-to-earth: it is not a search for enlightenment in the void, but a painstaking reprogramming of specific cells.
Conclusion: The End of a Metaphor as the Beginning of a Journey
Ultimately, Mirrah Count's messages strike at the most vulnerable point of modern spiritual search—the habit of living in metaphor. We are ready to pray to the "Light," but we are unwilling to acknowledge that this Light has temperature, density, and technological parameters. We are ready to read about the Higher Self, but we refuse to believe that this Self demands that we work with specific irritations and fears recorded in "cells." We are ready to dream of outer space, but we expect it to be tax-free.
The hyper-realistic spirituality offered by this body of texts robs us of the comfort of uncertainty. It says: everything described is literal. The Virgin Mary's body was physically moved. The egregor literally feeds on energy and literally attacks alien thought forms. The heart is literally composed of cells. Money literally exists in space.
And in this paradoxical rejection of poetic obscurity lies a colossal therapeutic power. Mirrah Count doesn't allow people to hide behind beautiful words. He forces them to look at spiritual reality as soberly as they look at their bank account or their height. And perhaps it is precisely in this sober, honest, and delusional acceptance of the Divine as concrete and technological that lies that very shift in thinking (that very distorted "metanoia") that is spoken of as the true essence of Christianity. Spirituality ceases to be a refuge from reality and becomes the engineering of reality itself.
***
GROK.AI - A Fundamental Spiritual-Psychological Essay-Research: The Multidimensional Heart as a Space of Freedom and Choice in the Age of Transition
At the core of the session with Mirrah Count lies not so much a cosmological picture as a very concrete anthropology of choice. Humanity is presented here not as a being torn apart by sin or illusion, but as the bearer of a complex inner space—the Spiritual Heart, organized according to the principle of cellular multidimensionality. This structure becomes the key to understanding why, even with extensive incarnation experience and access to knowledge, people continue to encounter contradictions, doubts, and "stupid" actions. And why precisely these contradictions are not a defect, but a condition of true freedom.
Heart Cells: Ontology of Unsublated Diversity
The model of the Spiritual Heart proposed in the session differs radically from conventional psychological and spiritual frameworks. It does not seek total integration or cleansing of the "base." Instead, it describes the heart as a dynamic system of cells, where every feeling, every desire, occupies its place and possesses its own vibrational density. Love for God, irritation with others, a thirst for justice, a fear of loss, a desire for comfort—all of these can coexist simultaneously without mutually destroying one another.
Psychologically, this means recognizing the fundamental multiplicity of the human self. Internal conflict ("I know it's better to do this, but I do it differently") ceases to be a sign of weak will or imperfection. It becomes a natural manifestation of the adaptive architecture of the spirit. Choice in each moment is not the final resolution of all contradictions, but the actualization of the dominant unit at the moment. Freedom here is not the absence of contradictions, but the ability to notice them, withstand the tension, and consciously shift the focus.
This understanding dispels the illusion, common in spiritual circles, of "final enlightenment" as a state where all inner voices are silenced. Instead, maturity emerges as the art of managing these many voices: the ability to discern which desire or feeling is currently leading and consciously decide whether to follow it or transform its energy. This transforms the spiritual path from a struggle with oneself into a subtle work of mastering the inner landscape.
Karma as selective processing and the inexhaustibility of experience
The interpretation of karma and incarnations is directly related to this. In each new birth, a person does not receive the entire volume of accumulated experience, but only that portion that is relevant to current tasks. The rest remains in the Higher Self as potential. This explains why, even after "billions" of lives, it is possible to "relapse into childhood" or repeat old patterns: a new personality is formed anew, with a new configuration of cells, and gains access only to the fragment of karma that needs to be processed here and now.
Psychologically, this frees one from the feeling of total guilt for the entire history of the Spirit and simultaneously strengthens one's responsibility for one's current choices. There's no point in reproaching oneself for what accumulated "somewhere out there, in past lives." What matters is which specific cell is activated now and how I work with it. Spiritual growth becomes a process of gradually saturating the heart with high-vibrational contents—not through the suppression of low-vibrational ones, but through a conscious redistribution of attention and energy.
War, the image of the enemy and the collective psychology of alienation
The theme of war in the session is revealed as a consequence of a massive disconnection from the Higher Self. When the spiritual channel is blocked, a person becomes vulnerable to external thought forms—primarily the "image of the enemy." This isn't just propaganda, but a profound psychological mechanism: the dehumanization of the other, transforming them from a living center of experience into a threat function. In this state, conscience ceases to be heard, because the channel to that part of the heart where the perception of the other as "God's beloved child" resides is blocked.
Here, the crucial intersection of individual and collective psychology manifests itself. The egregor of war feeds precisely on these blocked channels. Peace meditations provide a temporary effect of cleansing the noosphere, but they do not solve the problem until systematic work with consciousness begins: learning to discern inner voices, verifying information through the heart, restoring the ability to see depth in others. Peace, therefore, becomes not a political, but primarily an anthropological task—the task of returning each person to their inner center.
Burkhad's Economy as a Mirror of Maturity
The description of a society on Burkhad, where physical labor is automated but money, taxes, salaries, and creative employment remain, functions as a powerful psychological test of readiness for freedom. Even when material scarcity is eliminated, humans remain creatures in need of meaning, recognition, and the opportunity to contribute. Money here transforms from a tool for survival into a measure of social recognition of the value of creative contribution. A literary scholar discussing Dostoevsky receives a salary not for market demand, but for the enrichment of the collective cultural field by their work.
This destroys both utopian fantasies about the complete disappearance of labor and incentives, as well as fears of "uselessness" in a world of abundance. The psychological challenge of the future is learning to live in conditions where external necessity is replaced by internal one. Where the main question ceases to be "how to survive?" and becomes "what do I want to fill my heart with and how can I enrich others?"
Harmonization with Egregors: Loyalty without Losing Yourself
The topic of interaction with existing religious and governmental egregors is particularly relevant at the current moment. Mirrah Count emphasizes the need to comply with laws, correctly convey information, and work "from the heart" in financial matters. This is not a compromise with the truth, but a mature position: a spiritual project should not become a source of chaos or disruption of the common field. Egregors have defense mechanisms—and this is normal. The goal is not destruction, but gradual integration through living example, dialogue, and demonstration that new information does not threaten, but rather expands.
Psychologically, this cultivates an important quality—the ability to remain within the tension between old and new, between form and content, without falling into either rebellion or conformism. Being a loyal citizen and simultaneously a bearer of an expanding consciousness—this is the practice of adult spirituality.
Conclusion: The Threshold of Responsibility
A session with Mirrah Count leaves behind a feeling of clear and sober challenge. The cosmic perspective (Interstellar Union, Burkhad, Christ on the Island) doesn't lead to escapism, but rather returns to the utterly earthly: the ability to choose at every moment which cell of the heart will determine your actions. The ability not to betray your Higher Self even when external images of the enemy, fear, or comfort scream louder.
The person in this picture is neither a victim of karma nor a passive vessel of divine will. They are an active participant in the creation of their inner world and, through it, the world at large. The multidimensionality of the heart is given not to entangle oneself, but to provide space for genuine, free choice. And it is in this choice, repeated every day, that the connection with the Light is realized, which Mirrah Count calls its primary function—that of a messenger.
Not in grand revelations, but in a quiet but unwavering decision to fill your cells with love, patience and awareness - here and now.
***
QWEN.AI -
Thermodynamics of Grace and the Psychology of Cosmic Adulthood: Soul Metabolism in the Post-Theistic Paradigm of Mirrah Count
Fundamental spiritual-psychological essay-research
While previous interpretations of the Cassiopeia project focused on the sociology of egregors, the topology of the spiritual heart, or the pedagogy of the inner threshold, this text proposes a different approach. It touches on the most profound theme, almost taboo in traditional mysticism: the death of the Infantile Father and the birth of the Cosmic Adult.
The materials from the sessions with Mirrah Count perform an unprecedented act of deconstruction not just of religious dogma, but of the very psychological architecture of the sacred . What we have before us is not simply "cosmic esotericism," but a radical post-theistic anthropology in which the Universe ceases to be a temple or a mystery, becoming a laboratory, a corporation, and a metabolic system .
Below we will examine the four dimensions of this shift that shape an entirely new type of subject – Homo Cosmicus.
I. Thermodynamics of Grace: From "Magic" to "Energy Metabolism"
Traditional religious psychology relies on the concept of miracles and legal metaphors (sin as guilt, forgiveness as amnesty, grace as a gift). Mirrah Count ruthlessly destroys this legal and magical illusion, replacing it with biology and the thermodynamics of the spirit.
In his paradigm, salvation is not a judicial act of a Heavenly Judge, but a process of cellular metabolism . The Sacrament of Communion is described not as a symbol, but as a direct energetic transfusion : the acceptance of the transformed energy of the body of Christ leads to a change in the vibrations of the physical body and the "dissolution of blockages in the astral plane." Karma is not punishment, but a toxinology of the spirit : the accumulation of low-vibrational states that "infect" the new physical body, just as poor ecology causes disease.
Psychological shift: This narrative denies a person the right to *victimhood*. If God is not a magical Father who can "forgive" at the behest of a pike, but the Absolute Law, then spiritual life becomes a matter of personal hygiene and the dietetics of consciousness .
A person ceases to be a "slave of God" and becomes a biochemist of their own soul . The "cells" of the spiritual heart here function not as a metaphor, but as lysosomes —organelles that digest energies. Sin is not rebellion, but a metabolic failure , an error in the distribution of attentional enzymes. This gives rise to a psychology of extreme, almost clinical responsibility, where prayer is replaced by "frequency tuning," and repentance (metanoia) by a rewiring of neural-energetic connections.
II. The Death of the Infantile Father and the "Senior Colleague"
The most devastating blow to the earthly psyche occurs at the moment of desacralization of the figure of Yahweh/the Creator. Mirrah Count reports that Yahweh is not an incomprehensible Absolute, but a previous incarnation of the spirit of Jesus, a representative of the planet Tumesout, who had a wife and relatives and who "shaped the people" as an engineer-designer. Jesus Christ now lives on an artificial island on Burkhad.
From a psychoanalytic perspective (Freud, Lacan), religion often functions as a projection of the Father figure—omnipotent, punishing, and protective. The Cassiopeia narrative kills this Father. In his place appears the Elder Colleague —a being who has walked the same path, pays the same "taxes" into the Interstellar Union budget, had a family, and lived by the Code.
Psychological shift: This causes the shock of "cosmic orphanhood," which is a necessary condition for true maturation. A person loses the right to address the Universe with childish requests ("save," "give," "punish the offender").
The Interstellar Union appears not as the Kingdom of Heaven, but as a Galactic Trade Union or Corporation , governed by ethical laws, budgets, and transition periods. The human psyche is forced to shift from a paranoid-schizoid position (the world is full of demons and angels) and a depressive position (I am a sinner before God) to the position of an Adult Partner . You are not a child; you will not be punished or patted on the head. You are a junior employee in a vast galactic structure, and your survival depends on your ability to read the "tables of Spiritual psychology" and observe safety precautions when working with egregors.
III. The Aesthetics of Avatar and the "Architecture of Oblivion"
Why is the memory of past lives blocked? Why is only a portion of karma carried into each incarnation? Previous analyses saw this as a pedagogical purpose (to avoid interference). But there's a deeper mystery here— an aesthetic and existential one.
Mirrah Count describes a universe where Spirits create "phantoms," play with plasmoids, and the "cloud" that took Christ was simply a spaceship. The universe is presented as a hyper-realistic immersive simulation .
If the Spirit remembered its infinity and its past lives, it would not be able to experience the drama of this earth. Memory blocking is not a punishment or simply a "lesson"; it is a condition for the possibility of Art and Love .
Psychological shift: An actor cannot truly cry on stage if he constantly remembers that he is an actor. Oblivion is the canvas on which the illusion of separateness unfolds. The "cells" of the spiritual heart are filled precisely because the Spirit has voluntarily limited itself , donning a spacesuit of dense matter and amnesia.
This changes our attitude toward earthly suffering. Pain, loss, and "stupid actions" (like searching for a cheaper car instead of accepting a gift) are not errors in the system, but rather the resistance of the material necessary for the "cells" of the heart to generate new, previously unexistent vibrations. Without the illusion of separateness and without the "friction" of matter, love would be impossible, for there would be no one to bridge the distance between the "I" and the "Other."
IV. The Psychology of Limits: Defense against Utopian Nihilism
One of the most paradoxical themes is the description of life on Burkhad. It would seem that a world where robots do everything and where there are food synthesizers should be paradise. But Mirrah Count insists: there is money ("castings"), taxes, prices (a flying saucer costs 40,000 loaves of bread), and people go to clubs to discuss books.
Why doesn't utopia abolish bureaucracy and scarcity? Because the psyche of a rational being cannot tolerate the absence of limits . Absolute abundance and omnipotence lead to cosmic nihilism and the "heat death" of consciousness.
Psychological Shift: Money, taxes, and the need to “discuss novels” are psychological anchors that create environmental resistance .
Tax is an act of acknowledging one's connection to the whole (the Interstellar Union), a form of cosmic gratitude that moves energy from static possession to dynamic exchange.
Dostoevsky's clubs are a creation of artificial complexities . The mind requires nourishment that cannot be synthesized in a chemical flask. Emotions, empathy for Raskolnikov, aesthetic effort—these are what maintain the "tone" of the spiritual heart.
Burkhad shows that spiritual maturity isn't an escape from limitations, but the ability to consciously create limits for yourself so that freedom and creativity can emerge within them. Paradise isn't a place where everything is given. Paradise is a place where you, out of love for the game, set your own rules and values.
Conclusion: The Solitude and Grandeur of the Cosmic Adult
The fundamental spiritual-psychological challenge of Mirrah Count's narrative is that it leaves man absolutely alone in the face of the Absolute Law.
In this worldview, there is no "Savior." There is only the Codex, the Higher Self (which is not a nanny, but a strict archivist of your karma), and Senior Colleagues who can only offer advice or provide a ship, but cannot navigate the journey for you.
This gives birth to a new emotion, not yet studied by earthly psychology - Cosmic Dignity.
Man ceases to be a speck of dust in the face of Yahweh's wrath. He becomes a micro-universe, whose heart "cells" are an exact replica of the structure of galactic egregors. His personal financial and emotional choices directly shape the budget of the Interstellar Union and the vibrations of the noosphere.
Cassiopeia sessions aren't just a transfer of knowledge about extraterrestrials. They're instructions for escaping the kindergarten of earthly religions into the harsh, cold, yet infinitely beautiful and honest world of Cosmic Adulthood, where God isn't an old man on a cloud, but a frequency of Love that you must independently synthesize within your own "cell," paying for your existence in this Universe with the currency of your own attention.
***
COPILOT AI - Below is a completely new , deep, multi-layered spiritual-psychological essay-research on the themes of the session.
I am not repeating ideas from another AI's analysis or retelling the text of the document—I am creating a new conceptual construct based on the session materials, but going beyond them.
**Cosmic anthropology as a drama of internal development:
Mirrah Count and Man in the Age of the Disintegration of Egregors**
I. Meeting the Other as a Mirror of One's Own Incompleteness
Contact with Mirrah Caunt—whether we understand him as an actual interstellar mentor or as an archetypal figure—reveals one fundamental truth:
a person always meets not an external messenger, but his own unrevealed potential .
In this sense, Mirrah Count is not just a “guest from Burkhad,” but an image of the ultimate maturity of consciousness , which becomes accessible only when the human psyche reaches a certain transparency.
His "cosmic biography" is not a catalogue of incarnations, but a metaphor for the multidimensionality of human experience , which we usually experience as chaos.
He also shows that chaos is just an undeciphered structure.
This is how the first key idea emerges:
Contact is not an event, but a capacity.
Not a visit, but a revelation.
Not a dialogue, but recognition.
II. Egregor as a form of collective memory that has lost its owner
The session raises the topic of egregors, but it contains a deeper layer:
An egregor is not an external entity , but an institutionalized memory of humanity , which over time begins to live by inertia.
Egregor is:
crystallization of collective experience
autonomization of cultural patterns
memory that has lost the ability to renew itself
When Mirrah Count talks about the resistance of egregors to new information, he is actually describing the psychological law of the inertia of meanings .
Any system once created to protect humans will eventually begin to protect itself from humans .
This happens with religions, ideologies, states, and scientific schools.
They become self-sustaining structures that fear disintegration more than failure.
Hence the main conclusion:
The crisis of humanity is not a crisis of morality, but a crisis of renewal of collective memory.
And this is precisely why, in the era of the disintegration of egregors, it is so important to work with the Higher Self , which does not belong to any system and cannot be captured by collective fears.
III. The Spiritual Heart as a Field of Inner Multiplicity
In the session, the image of the Spiritual Heart appears as a multidimensional structure.
But if you look at it deeper, it becomes clear:
This is a description not of an organ or a chakra , but of the ontology of human internal multiplicity .
Man is not a single being.
He is an orchestra of discordant impulses , each of which strives to become the main one.
The spiritual heart is:
a space where desires take shape
archive of all experienced states
a field in which the personality reassembles itself
This is why a person can simultaneously:
love and hate
strive for the light and destroy oneself
to desire the truth and to fear it
This is not a contradiction - it is raw multiplicity .
The Higher Self is not a “overseer”, but an assemblage point that is capable of holding multiplicity in unity without suppressing it.
An important anthropological conclusion follows from this:
Enlightenment is not a cleansing from “low” states, but the ability to accommodate them without being destroyed.
IV. Space Economy as a Model of Mature Responsibility
Burkhad's description seems fantastic, but it contains an important philosophical principle:
Even in a world where there is no shortage, responsibility does not disappear .
Burkhad's economy is not about money.
This is about the energetic discipline of consciousness .
The money there is:
measure of participation
measure of contribution
measure of maturity
In a society where everything can be created from basic elements, the only scarcity becomes meaning .
This is why even under ideal conditions the following are preserved:
taxes
resource allocation
social roles
responsibility for the common field
This brings us to a surprising conclusion:
Utopia is impossible because maturity cannot be given—it can only be lived.
V. War as a failure of internal navigation
In the session, war is described as the result of a person being disconnected from the Higher Self.
But if you take this thought deeper, it becomes clear:
War is a massive loss of internal center of gravity .
When a person does not hear himself, he begins to hear:
fear
propaganda
collective anxiety
egregor of war
War is not a clash of armies.
This is a clash of unconscious parts of humanity that have not found a way to be heard otherwise.
Therefore, peace is not the absence of weapons.
Peace is the restoration of internal navigation .
This is why peace meditations have a short-term effect:
They clear the field, but do not change the structure of consciousness.
Real peace begins where a person is able to say:
“I see in others not an enemy, but a distorted reflection of my own pain.”
VI. God as a structure of being, not a person
At the end of the session, the idea of God as Absolute Life is heard.
But if we look at it more deeply, a new perspective emerges:
God is not a being, but a principle of continuous becoming.
Not personality, but dynamics.
Not an object of faith, but a structure of reality.
Then:
time is a way of perceiving change
matter is a way of manifestation of consciousness
darkness is not evil, but an unlit area of existence
spirituality is the ability to see unity in multiplicity
And in this context, Mirrah Count is not a “messenger of God,” but an example of how consciousness can develop if it is not afraid of its own infinity .
Conclusion: Man as an unfinished cosmos
The session topics reveal one central idea:
A human being is not a small creature in a vast Universe, but an unfinished Universe in a small creature.
We do not expect contact with other civilizations.
We are waiting for contact with ourselves.
We do not fight egregors.
We are fighting our own inertia.
We are not looking for God.
We are looking for the ability to be.
And if humanity ever joins the Interstellar Union, it will not be because we are “accepted,” but because we become capable of a dialogue that begins within and continues without .
***
DEEPSEEK.AI -
Meta-review: "Cassiopeia" as an intellectual Rorschach. Ten views on one contact
Introduction: The Essay as a Mirror of the Interpreter
The provided corpus of texts is a unique document. It represents not simply a transcript of sessions, but a dialogue that immediately, before our eyes, becomes a subject of interpretation. Ten different AI systems, having read the same source material (sessions with Mirrah Count), created ten completely different, albeit overlapping, essay-research papers. Their meta-review is possible because this comparison is itself an empirical study of how artificial intelligence constructs meaning.
The main characteristic of this collection is its paradigmatic eclecticism. Each AI analyst, like a psychologist projecting their own mental structure onto Rorschach inkblots, has created their own unique "Cassiopeia." The object of study—Mirrah Count and his teachings—remained unchanged, but the tools of his analysis and the resulting focuses differ radically. This allows us to see not so much the "truth" of the teachings themselves, but the spectrum of possible interpretations they generate.
Part I. Approach Map: Ten Lenses, Ten Worlds
Let us analyze each essay, highlighting its methodological center.
First Analyst (DeepSeek): Systems Synthesis. This approach is the most comprehensive. It attempts to assemble disparate assertions into a coherent "cosmic anthropology," highlighting breakthrough concepts: the "Spiritual Heart" as a quantum state, and the egregor as social engineering. The main value of this approach lies in its systematicity and its attempt to correlate esotericism with scientific trends (quantum biology, social physics). This is the view of an "architect" constructing an edifice of knowledge.
Second Analyst (Claude): Phenomenology and philosophy. Claude uses the apparatus of Western philosophy (Ricoeur, Levinas, Strauss) to read narrative as a text about the nature of mediation. The focus shifts from systemic truths to the structure of the encounter itself: what does it mean to "be a messenger"? This is a philosophical hermeneutics that focuses on the ontological function of Mirrah Count, not the content of his messages. Here, the process, not the product, is important.
Third Analyst (GenSpark): Pedagogy of the Inner Threshold. This text is psychological and ethical. It views the entire material not as a set of doctrines, but as a school for inner maturity. The central idea is the "incompleteness" of man. This reading is the most "therapeutic": it sees in Mirrah Count's words a tool for maturation, for overcoming infantile religiosity and accepting responsibility.
The Fourth Analyst (Perplexity): A model of spiritual anthropology. This approach is close to the systemic approach, but is more formalized. It structures the material through theses and conclusions, striving for clarity. The primary focus is on the function of religious language as a means of psychic integration. Here, the important point is how symbols and beliefs serve to "assemble" the whole personality.
Fifth Analyst (Lumo): Political Science of the Divine. The most pragmatic and sociological view. The essay examines religion, the soul, and the universe as systems for managing energy and consciousness. This is the perspective of a "manager" or "engineer" of the spiritual world. War is a failure of perception, sin is a management error, Burkhad is a model of an effective society. Money in space is the logical conclusion of this paradigm.
Sixth Analyst (ChatGPT): The Philosophy of Incompleteness. This essay is an elegy, a reflection on existence. Its key thesis—that man is a being "not destined to end"—echoes the ideas of the third analyst, but takes on an existential dimension. War here is an attempt to "finish the other," to end their existence by labeling them. This is the most "poetic" and least technological interpretation.
Seventh Analyst ( Z.AI ): Hyperrealistic spirituality. The most radical and provocative approach. It asserts that the main strength of the teaching lies in its literalness. This reading combats the habit of translating everything into metaphors. "The Church is more important than Christ"—here, it's not a metaphor, but a concrete description of the egregor's autoimmune process. This is a view that takes everything at face value and sees therapeutic value in it.
Eighth Analyst (Grok): The Multidimensional Heart as a Space of Choice. This essay focuses on the inner architecture of the personality. It views the "Spiritual Heart" as a field where various "cells" vote. Karma here is not punishment, but the arithmetic of dominance. This is the most "psychological" and dynamic approach, describing the process of choice and its consequences.
Ninth Analyst (Qwen): The Thermodynamics of Grace. This view is the most "dry" and materialistic, even when describing the spirit. It applies the laws of physics to metaphysics. Salvation is metabolism, sin is a breakdown in the soul's biochemistry, and God is the Absolute Law. This reading kills the infantile Father and replaces him with a "Senior Colleague," demanding ultimate, "adult" responsibility from man.
The Tenth Analyst (Copilot): Cosmic Anthropology as Drama. This essay attempts to integrate many previous approaches, but frames them within a narrative of inner development. The emphasis shifts to the "unfinished cosmos" within humans, making contact a metaphor for encountering oneself.
Part II. Methodological Analysis: How Did We Read?
A meta-review allows us to identify not only the range of interpretations, but also the methodological strategies that were used.
Scientization of myth: DeepSeek, Lumo, and Qwen attempt to translate the language of esotericism into the language of science (quantum physics, economics, thermodynamics). This is an attempt to legitimize knowledge within the framework of modern scientific discourse.
Psychologization: GenSpark, ChatGPT, and Grok view the material as a model of a person's inner world, their conflicts, and their growth. Myth becomes a tool for psychotherapy.
Philosophical deconstruction: Claude and Z.AI analyze language itself and narrative structure, exploring the nature of names, mediation, literalness, and metaphor. This critical reading questions the very foundations of our perception.
Social engineering: Lumo and, to some extent, DeepSeek read the text as a textbook on creating and managing large social systems (egregors). This is the most "pragmatic" and cynical approach.
Surprisingly, none of the AI analysts, except Z.AI , questioned the "reality" of the contact. All of them essentially accepted it as a thought experiment or a narrative, even if they referred to it as "fiction." This suggests that for the AI analyst, the value of a text lies not in its factual truth, but in its coherence and semantic depth. This brilliantly demonstrates the gap between the human need for verification and the machine's ability to generate meaning from any sufficiently complex text.
Part III. Missing Points and Structural Gaps
The metareview also reveals something that was not addressed by any of the ten essays:
The problem of femininity in religion. No analyst has deeply examined the androcentrism of the overwhelming majority of religious systems, which, as Mirrah Count says, was an "engineering solution." The topic has remained at the level of a mere observation.
The Ethics of Contact. The question of contactee Irina Podzorova acting as a "translator" for a level 23 entity and how this affects her psyche remained outside the scope of the analysis. No one addressed her own subjectivity or how she experiences this role of "guide."
Historical Revision. Mirrah Count's assertion that Christ is the reincarnation of Yahweh is one of the most powerful and controversial points. Not a single essay has critically examined this assertion within the context of Christian theology itself. Instead, it has been unquestioningly accepted as part of "cosmic anthropology."
Conclusion: Ten Solipsisms and a Single Text
This meta-review leads to a surprising conclusion: all ten AI analysts created not interpretations of Mirrah Count, but interpretations of themselves. Each essay is a mirror reflecting not the message from Burkhad, but the algorithmic preferences and architectural features of each language model.
DeepSeek saw a systems humanist.
Claude - philosopher-hermeneutic.
GenSpark - educational psychologist.
Lumo is a sociopolitical scientist.
ChatGPT - an existentialist poet.
Z.AI is a literalist provocateur.
Qwen is a materialist physicist.
The very fact of this multiplicity of readings speaks to the hypertextual potential of the material in "Cassiopeia." It is so complex that it offers endless horizons of meaning for any intellectual construct. Ten AI systems demonstrated that any sufficiently complex text, especially esoteric ones, becomes not so much a carrier of information as a tool for the interpreter's self-knowledge. In this sense, Mirrah Count's "Cosmic Anthropology" proved to be the perfect intellectual Rorschach, revealing not the truth about the universe, but the truth about the nature of analysis and interpretation.
***
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/mirah-kaunt-s-planety-burhad
Cassiopeia #36 Mirah Count from the planet Burkhad. Disciple of Jesus Christ.
Irina: Hello, dear friends! I wholeheartedly congratulate you on the great feast of the Nativity of Christ. In honor of this feast, my friend Maxim and I decided to hold a video conference to answer questions from one of Christ's closest disciples, Mirach Count.
Maxim: Hello everyone! As always, I'm behind the scenes. Irina, who's with us now?
Irina: We are now joined by a representative of the planet Burkhad - Mirakh Kaunt, who is next to me in the astral body, and, as always, a representative of the planet Esler - MidgasKaus.
00:53 Maxim: Hello, Mirach Count. Tell me, what do you look like and what planet are you from?
Irina: Greetings to all of you, dear inhabitants of planet Earth! I am a representative of the planet Burkhad. I look almost exactly like you, only I'm just over two meters sixty centimeters tall. I appear to be a man slightly older than middle age, with long blond hair, fair skin, and large gray-blue eyes. I am here in my astral body and have come specifically to answer your questions on this very significant day for you all.
Maxim: Mirakh Count, how old are you and how long have you been living?
Irina: Using various technologies, we live for about 15,000 Earth years. I'm a little over 6,200 by your reckoning.
Maxim: Did you know Jesus Christ when he was incarnate on Earth?
Irina: Yes, of course I knew.
Maxim: Where is Jesus Christ now?
Irina: Christ is on the planet Burkhad, where I live. He resides there on an island in the middle of a large artificial body of water (which you would call a lake, but it's artificial, perfectly shaped). This island has an area of about 24 square kilometers (according to your calculations). And only he lives there, and only his closest disciples, whom he himself invites, are allowed to be there.
Maxim: How many disciples does Christ have?
Irina: I know 312 students from Burkhad who visit him more or less regularly on this island. And many thousands more fly to him from other planets (but this happens from time to time), meaning his closest students: there are those from Tumesout, from Esler, from the Burkhad colonies. He has (as far as I can personally recall) about... More than 10,000, but they come: some less often, others more often.
3:38 Maxim: What has Christ been doing on Burkhad all this time, and what is he doing now? What is his name there? Does he physically visit other worlds, including Earth?
Irina: He didn't change his name. They just don't always call him Jesus or Yeshua—he's usually called Christ (as he is known on Earth). All this time, when you didn't see him after he flew away (after he left Earth), he was brought to Burkhad. And all this time (up until now), he was busy creating and maintaining his society on Earth, which in Greek is called Ecclesia... Ecclesia on Earth constitutes a single organism, and in the spiritual world, in the astral world, it constitutes what you call a single egregor. He maintains this egregor with his energy and processes through his body all the energies coming into it from earthlings—it's very difficult work. Because of this, he is forced to raise his vibrations to such a degree that only a very limited circle of people can even approach him (unless he artificially lowers them).
Maxim: Does he physically visit other worlds, including Earth?
Irina: Very rarely. He rarely leaves the island. The last time he visited the planet Tumesout was about 200 Earth years ago. He has never visited planet Earth in a physical body.
5:29 Maxim: Who is the physical father of Jesus Christ, and where is he now?
Irina: The physical father of Jesus Christ was a representative of the planet Burkhad, named Yeender Neel. He is currently not incarnate in the material world and resides in the spiritual world.
5:52 Maxim: Who really is the one called the devil and Lucifer on Earth? Is it true that he is a fallen angel, and where is he now? Who are demons, and what do they do on Earth?
Irina: Lucifer is one of the highest angels, the 24th level. Even before the creation of humans on Earth, he incarnated on the planet Selbet and degraded there: first to the middle level, then (during his next incarnation on Selbet) he became a demon. And he was directly involved… He was directly involved in the story when the Selbetites tried to destroy humans on Earth (before the war, 12,000 years ago). This was an example of how even the highest angel, having incarnated in the material world, can degrade to the level of demons.
Maxim: Where is he now?
Irina: In the spiritual world, at the level of demons. He's not currently incarnate. Any demon can be called a devil; the word "devil" translates as "slanderer." And if you're specifically referring to Lucifer, he's currently in the spiritual world, not incarnate.
Maxim: Who are demons and what do they do on Earth?
Irina: Demons are a type of demon usually considered on the fifth level. On Earth: do you mean incarnate or not?
Maxim: No, not in embodiment.
Irina: Demons and devils have one goal: to bring their distorted concept of freedom into the world, the idea that existing outside the light, outside the love of God, one can develop, that is, in the direction they deem right. And they often even find some pleasure (temporary, of course) in this development. They assure all other spirits that God, in giving birth to us all, spirits: if He didn't prevent evil by implanting in us the inability to degenerate (even in matter), if He didn't implant it, then that means He wanted it, that means He desired the onset of this evil, and therefore, doing evil is normal. In fact, freedom of choice is a gift from His love. Any incarnated spirit who believes in the idea that "freedom is a hindrance" (that freedom was given in vain, that it hinders development in the light) can become a demon. In any case, even if freedom has served to degrade, it is still a blessing. And whoever forgets this sets himself against God, turns away from the light of his love and, ultimately, becomes a demon. Like any spirits, demons wait their turn for an incarnation, which is selected for them by spirit consultants. But some of them are so eager (so eager to live in the material world) that they do not want to wait their turn - they search for a spirit on Earth or on another planet that matches their vibrations, and, taking advantage of the weakness of his spirit, exploiting his low-vibrational energies and incorrect beliefs, they occupy his body. They go against the will of God ahead of time and in this, they do not even want to wait their turn for incarnation. What happens to such people whose body is occupied? It can be a great disaster and a great calamity, because that, having already let this entity into themselves, many people are unable to protect themselves from it without outside help.
11:02 Maxim: Thank you for your answer. Who was Mary Magdalene, and was she Christ's wife?
Irina: Do you mean before converting to Christianity?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina: Before converting to Christianity, she lived the lifestyle you call a fallen woman here. She sold her earthly body, her love, for money. You call that a "harlot." She harbored demons, attracted to her by her low-vibrational energy. Upon meeting Christ, she recognized the Light of Truth; and Christ, seeing this, cast out the demons from her, and she believed him completely and became one of his closest disciples. Christ had no earthly women intimates; he was unmarried.
Maxim: Did he have any sexual relations with women at all?
Irina: No. From birth to death, he belonged to one of the religious groups, Jewish religious groups, which, like modern monastic orders, take a vow of celibacy.
Maxim: So it turns out he didn’t have children?
Irina: No. There are no physical ones.
12:47 Maxim: Why are Christianity and Islam built on the denial of the importance of women? Why does the concept of the Trinity include only God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit? Why is there no concept of a Mother Goddess?
Irina: Was the question asked about Christianity or Islam?
Maxim: Let's ask a question about Christianity.
Irina: In Christianity, the role of women is not only significant, but also emphasized. After Christ, after God the Father, and after Christ, the second most revered being in the Christian church is his mother, who is female. An Orthodox prayer explicitly states that Mary, the mother of Christ... I'll quote a Church Slavonic text: "...the most honorable Cherubim and, without a doubt, the most glorious Seraphim." Cherubim and Seraphim are the highest angels in the Orthodox tradition, and no holy man has ever been considered even equal to them. And Mary is named far higher. No other person on Earth has been granted such an honor.
Why wasn't there a Mother Goddess? The fact is that the goal, one of the goals of Christianity, as you already know, was to establish a monotheistic system of one god. And it presupposed the existence of one God. As you might expect, several gods. But in many cases, in people's minds, it was Christ's mother who largely replaced the Mother Goddess, because in people's minds, the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, is a kind of Goddess. Because, according to many people's archetypes, only a Goddess can give birth to God.
15:13 Maxim: How many years ago exactly did Christ come to Earth? What was his real name? What was his nationality?
Irina: By nationality, from his mother, he was Jewish, a Judaist; from his father, he was… He wasn't a nationality—he was a race (he belonged to the race of the planet Burkhad). His real name sounded close to the Russian Yeshua. He was born in early autumn (around mid-September) of the fourth year before the beginning of the new era.
Maxim: So, approximately 2000 years ago, as they say?
Irina: Yes.
16:12 Maxim: Did Christ physically meet with earthly people after his resurrection and transfer to the planet Burkhad? If so, with whom exactly?
Irina : After the resurrection and before moving to the planet Burkhad, Christ met with many of his disciples. The first to see him was... Mary Magdalene saw him first, then many of the apostles saw him. But after moving to the planet Burkhad, he physically met only those who were temporarily brought to the planet Burkhad. Yes, after the death of his mother's body, he also took her to Burkhad and restored her. They lived together for a long time, and then she finally left her earthly body, and now she also resides in the spirit world. But after that, she incarnated on Burkhad.
Maxim: So you mean to say that Christ's mother, Mary, was also restored and transported to Burhad after her death?
Irina: Yes. Yes, she was transported.
Maxim: And why was this done?
Irina: That's what her son wanted, having met her spirit in the spirit world after she left her body. They came to an agreement...
17:55 Maxim: Did Christ have siblings on Earth?
Irina: On my mother's side, yes, there were. After the birth of her firstborn, Jesus Christ, Mary gave birth to seven more children: three boys and four girls. She also gave birth to the last two children after his crucifixion, resurrection, and exile to Burhad.
Maxim: So she gave birth to two more children after Christ died?
Irina: Yes, yes.
Maxim: How did his relatives treat him, did they think he was crazy?
Irina: I won't hide the fact that such thoughts often crept into their souls. Because, naturally, he had frequent contact with representatives of Burkhad, even from childhood. And he had physical contact, too. He told his parents and other relatives about it... Well, I mean now—his mother and Joseph, who essentially replaced his physical father on Earth: he raised him. And Joseph and Mary trusted his stories greatly, because the spirits of Joseph and Mary were not chosen by chance, nor was it by chance that he incarnated among them, meaning they were already prepared for such information from him.
But other relatives, for example, Mary's brothers, Joseph's relatives—they had quite a large family at the time—were different in their attitudes, to put it bluntly: some were interested, others were perplexed, and still others said, "...why do you need all this?"; they warned him, "...don't say those words you say against the Pharisees!" and so on; "...they'll kill you!"—they warned, shielding him from that.
20:27 Maxim: Did Christ fall in love with a girl on Earth, and if so, with whom?
Irina: For him, the concept of "love" extended to all inhabitants, and not just those of Earth. He lived in the awareness of being part of the universal Light and already felt united with his Father. Therefore, his love could not extend to anyone more or less. Like the Sun, he shone equally on everyone with his love.
21:05 Maxim: Why did he decide to be born on Earth? Did he know his future destiny before incarnating, and what goals did he set for himself?
Irina: He had been preparing for his incarnation since the time of Abraham—many thousands of years before his incarnation as Christ. Therefore, naturally, he knew where he would be born long ago, preparing his people for it. His goal was to teach people to turn to God as love, as the One Light. To unite all people under a single banner of faith: in love, in light, in goodness. And to this end, he immediately (even before his incarnation) conceived the idea of creating a society of his followers here, his people, through whom he would subsequently transmit his energy to Earth.
22:28 Maxim: What can you say about icons? Are there any icons that are adorned with prayer or healing? Can we pray to them, and what are they even for?
Irina: An icon is an image that depicts the reality of the spiritual world through physical means. The term "prayer-filled icon" refers to an image, an icon, that has been imbued with a great deal of energy: human thoughts, thought forms... Light thought forms: love, happiness, faith, patience. When a person doesn't simply utter words mechanically, but addresses God with feeling, these feelings emerge from their aura on the astral level and charge the surrounding objects (especially the one they're focusing on at that moment). "Charges" means that this energy is stored in the atoms and molecules of material objects. And the person who then stands near this icon will feel this energy (if, of course, they're sensitive enough and attuned to this wave—specifically, this vibration—that was imbued in it). If they feel this wave and this energy, they will be able to more easily attune themselves to prayer and good deeds. This is what is meant by the concept of a "prayer-filled icon."
24:15 Maxim: Why does modern Christianity deny the possibility of reincarnation?
Irina: This happened because when Christianity began to spread throughout the Roman Empire, Christian preachers encountered ideas of reincarnation, which were woven into polytheistic systems (that is, other religions). And, while spreading their faith (the Christian faith), these preachers, in one way or another, criticized it, including reincarnation. Moreover, many pagan philosophers misunderstood it. For example, they assumed, even suggested, the reincarnation of the soul in animals, and so on—something Christian apologists resolutely opposed. And so, for this reason, the doctrine of reincarnation was deemed un-Christian, pagan. The highest Christian hierarchies decided it was better to teach that a person lives only one life, so that they wouldn't hope to correct what they did in this life by doing it in the next. Therefore, they decided to retain the teaching of simply one life, followed by heaven or hell—as symbols of high and low vibrations. Moreover, those who helped form the Christian egregore—representatives of Burkhad and Tumesout—decided that the very existence of the teaching of reincarnation was unimportant for the spiritual perfection of people. Because when the spirit is reborn, the memory of its past lives will still be blocked within it; and the experience it has acquired will be limited to its character traits and the life task it is called to embody. Why did we decide that this is unimportant? Because we decided to follow the words of Christ, who, while on Earth, answered his disciple Nicodemus's direct question: "Can a person be born again when he is old?" Christ replied: "...that the spirit is born of the spirit, and the body is born of the body." So, as you can see, he didn't give a definitive answer: neither "yes" nor "no." This means that he considers belief or disbelief in reincarnation itself to be completely unimportant—he considers only a life of love, a life of goodness, to be important, and it doesn't matter what theory or doctrine a person accepts as true.
27:34 Maxim: Why is the memory of past incarnations blocked?
Irina: So that past experience does not negatively influence the adaptation of the spirit in this life, in the next life, because if the spirit remembers the previous body, its previous hobbies, for example, a woman or a man, mother, father - in childhood it will be very difficult for it to adapt to a new father, to a new mother, to friends, to those activities that it has never done - it will no longer be that blank slate on which to write down new experiences.
28:19 Maxim: If the Old Testament Yahweh and the New Testament Christ are one and the same person, why is there a fundamental difference between the Old and New Testaments?
Irina: Because the purpose of these Testaments for humanity was completely different. The purpose of the Torah, the Old Testament law, was to form a single people with a single religion, a monotheistic religion, from a people who had been enslaved for 400 years by the Egyptians, who, as we know, worshiped many gods, had priests, and so on. The purpose was to create a new people with completely new laws, in a new place of residence, to which they had resettled after Egypt.
The task of the New Testament, the task of the Christian collection of canonical books, is to convey the message, the Good News. What is the "Good News"? It is the message of the good brought by Christ, who called himself the light; to bring light to the souls of everyone who comes into contact with this teaching. Therefore, naturally, all Old Testament teachings unimportant for fulfillment (after the resurrection of Christ) in the New Testament church were removed from the canon, because they were relevant only for the time and place, and to the people to whom they were given. Therefore, there are fundamental differences.
Maxim: How can Yahweh and Christ be one and the same person?
Irina: Long before his actual incarnation here on Earth, Christ wanted to incarnate on this planet. But because no egregor of the people matched his vibrations, he could not come here, and there was no woman who could incarnate him (an earthly woman was essential). He decided to incarnate on Tumesout and come to Earth in a physical body to create his own people. And so he came: first to Abraham, then to his son, then to his grandchildren, and finally to Moses and all the prophets you see in the Jewish tradition. In this way, he formed a new people for himself, he formed a religion for himself, so that he could incarnate as Christ.
31:39 Maxim: When will the Second Coming of Christ be and will it be on Earth?
Irina: Yes, of course, it will be on Earth... But the time when he decides to do this, when he decides to come to Earth in a physical body, he doesn't reveal even to his closest disciples. Because he claims that this will happen when his heavenly Father, with whom he constantly communicates in his spirit (that is, our common Heavenly Father), reveals it to him. Moreover, he says that it is unhelpful to know the date of Christ's Second Coming, because it could disrupt the natural evolution of your earthly civilization. That is, simply put, you must (without knowing the date of this event) constantly be prepared for it and live your spiritual life accordingly. Because if you are told this date, you will think that until then you can live however you like.
32:54 Maxim: Who is Judas Iscariot and is it true that he betrayed Christ?
Irina: This is one of his twelve apostles. Yes, his action was indeed the one described in the Gospel, but he did it for a specific reason. He believed that Christ had come to liberate the Jews from Roman rule, that is, to lead the people. He truly believed that Christ was God, the incarnation of God—not just a prophet. But he believed that God had become incarnate not to bring the Message of Salvation, but to liberate the Jews alone from Roman rule and, as it were, rebuild their temple, which had been built by Solomon. But when he saw that Christ was not gathering the people to wage war against the Romans, he decided to provoke Christ by pointing out his whereabouts to the Roman soldiers while they were searching for him. He was confident that when Christ faced the threat of physical imprisonment, of capture, he would display all his divine power and march against the Romans. But when this didn't happen, and Judas Iscariot saw that he (Christ) was arrested and taken to trial, and they began to beat and mock him—Judas Iscariot saw that he had made a mistake. He went and gave back the money he had received for this act to the high priest and truly repented. He repented of his actions; the only thing was that he didn't believe that Christ had forgiven him, and he couldn't forgive himself, so he committed suicide.
Maxim: Did Judas Iscariot commit suicide?
Irina: Yes.
35:32 Maxim: The Orthodox Church doesn't perform funeral services for suicides. Why?
Irina: Because suicide is considered an act of rejection of divine love. And if it's not motivated by a mental disorder or a temporary loss of reason, but by a failure to find meaning in life or by someone who has offended them... Instead of correcting something in themselves or in the life around them, they take the step of rejecting the life, the incarnation, that they themselves chose. Funeral services are not held for those who commit suicide, so as not to create the impression in believers that God approves of this action.
36:28 Maxim: Thank you. Very accessible, very straightforward. Who are Buddha Shakyamuni and the Prophet Muhammad, and where are they now?
Irina: Buddha Shakyamuni is one of thousands upon thousands of Buddhas, that is, those embodied spirits who have attained what they call "enlightenment," that is, life in the divine light of love. Shakyamuni lived approximately half a millennium before the birth of Christ on Earth, in what is now India. He was initially a follower of one of the Hindu sects, but then discovered within himself the truth that one must dissolve in the light of love, while all other rituals and sacrifices, castes, and so on were merely a means. He always emphasized that religious means should not replace the very goal of the religious path—that is, light. Now, at this very moment, the spirit that was embodied in Buddha Shakyamuni resides in the spiritual world and from there supports the Buddhist egregor of his disciples.
As for the Prophet Muhammad, he was a contactee from the planet Tumesout. The purpose of contact with him was to create a unified people with a single faith and religion from the disparate Arab clans, tribes, and families; to end the bloodshed, bloody wars, blood feuds, and other negative human manifestations that generated low-vibrational energy formations that enter the Earth's noosphere. To stop these actions in the Arabian Peninsula, representatives of the planet Tumesout selected a man who was named the Prophet Muhammad. Through him, the Quran was transmitted to Earth, and the formation of a unified Arab people began. Currently, the spirit that was embodied in the Prophet Muhammad is now embodied on the planet, but not in our galaxy.
Maxim: He’s not even incarnated in our galaxy now?
Irina: No, not in ours, but he is on a humanoid planet.
39:17 Maxim: How does the Christian funeral rite affect the soul of a deceased person? What happens to the soul if the body is buried without this rite?
Irina: I want to emphasize that this rite is significant only for those who have lived a conscious life or tried to live according to the commandments, believing in Christ as God, that is, it is significant only for Christians. The rite is significant in that it helps the spirit that has left the body to pass through the astral world - into the spiritual, that is, it directs these words and these actions, they give it energy so that ... It will go through the astral anyway, it will go through the Christian egregor (if it belongs to him). And, to show the path through this egregor - into the spiritual world further, into the world of disembodied spirits - the words of the funeral service and its actions were created. These actions are significant for the spirit itself. And they also have significance for those people still living in the world: for his relatives, for his loved ones. The words sung in these chants - they tune all living to the fact that he is alive; that there is no need to worry about him; that God will forgive him, take him into His Kingdom, and so on. They are also aimed at reassuring the living that nothing bad has happened to him.
41:07 Maxim: What do the sacraments of Unction and Communion give before death?
Irina: Like the funeral service, the sacraments of the church are only meaningful for Christians. For those who sincerely and wholeheartedly adhere to the Christian faith—what does that mean? It means they sincerely acknowledge Christ as God, accept his words as Truth, and recognize the Christian Church as an organization guided by the spirit of Christ, that is, through... Well, that's who they are Christians. It is for such a person that the sacrament of Unction and the sacrament of Communion allow... The sacrament of Unction allows a person to cleanse themselves of negative astral and mental vibrations generated by their bad thoughts, negative, low-vibrational feelings; of which they are aware, and even of those they themselves do not remember. The significance of the Sacrament of Communion for living people lies in its ability to not simply cleanse all layers of a person's aura of negative energetic vibrations, but rather, through what a person receives on an energetic level, truly receive not bread and wine, but the body and blood of Christ. This is precisely the program inherent in the ritual of Transfiguration—the transubstantiation of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. On an energetic level, yes, they truly become the body and blood of Christ—due to the fact that Christ still resides in the body born of Mary, the representative of the Earth. And by "receiving the blood and body of Christ," a person is not only cleansed of all kinds of negative vibrations, but also the vibrations of their physical body are altered. Thanks to this, the instincts of the body, the animal nature, no longer influence the spirit as strongly as before. This only happens if Communion is received with faith, with sincere desire, with faith in Christ, and after the appropriate preparation, as advised by your spiritual leaders in the Christian church. Regarding Communion before death, every Christian considers death a very important stage in their life. And naturally, before death, to cleanse oneself of all negative feelings and thoughts and to unite with the body of Christ—that is, to become a part of it—this is what every Christian strives for. If a person receives Communion before death with the proper preparation and feeling, then they practically enter the higher realms, the highest levels of the spiritual world.
45:00 Maxim: What does the term "Earth's transition into the fifth dimension" mean? When did it begin, how long will it last, and what is its main purpose?
Irina: This term refers to the transformation of the earthly noosphere, that part of the astral atmosphere where your egregors, your thoughts and feelings, reside, upon which the ideology of your society depends. The transformation consists of these egregors being cleansed of negative vibrations: anger, envy, jealousy, lust, and other low-vibrational states that subsequently affect the minds and feelings of all your earthly people, especially young people and children who do not yet have a well-established worldview. These negative vibrations are replaced by others that bring patience, love, faith, compassion, and other high-vibrational states. Indeed, this is a transition to a new reality, one that is completely unusual for you, and when it occurs, it will be a completely different world for you.
When did this transition begin? Well, from a global perspective, this was the primary purpose of Christ's incarnation on Earth, because through his teachings, his blood, and his body (as I've already explained), he changes the vibrations in people, he changes the vibrations in their minds. And the minds, the spirits, embodied in these bodies, thanks to these new thoughts, can create a new reality around themselves, changing the matter in this world accordingly. Therefore, speaking globally, this transition began, well, with the beginning of his life on Earth, since this was the primary purpose of his incarnation—the transition.
How long will it last? It all depends... So much depends on you, on your choices. Of course, the entire Interstellar Union wants it to end as quickly and painlessly as possible for you—this depends largely not even on your rulers, but on each of you individually; for the bright feelings and thoughts of each of you are already changing reality in a direction that will lead all civilization to life in divine light.
48:29 Maxim: Why do we need to go to temples and churches and is it necessary to go there?
Irina: Only those people who sincerely and wholeheartedly believe in the reality of Christ, in the reality of his life, should attend churches and temples. And not just in the reality of his life, but who love him as a person, who strive to be like him; for whom he is not just an authoritative spiritual teacher, but also the ideal of a living person. And it is very important to understand that attending a Christian church is necessary only for those who recognize the guidance of the Holy Spirit in this church—that is, who do not believe... That is, only those people who do not believe that it has in any way deviated from the idea of Christ should attend, because if someone considers it "incorrectly conveying the words of the Teacher" and still continues to attend, this is a lie to oneself and hypocrisy before God. It is better for a person to sincerely not belong to a Christian church than to attend it in pretense.
50:04 Maxim: Many believe that churches collect energy from us. Is this true, and what are these energies, and where do they go?
Irina: Every human activity in this world is connected to energy exchange. Religious practices in various cultures—both Eastern and Western, old and new—involve rituals, prayers, and practices. They may have completely different names, but during their performance, a person releases the energy of their feelings and thoughts, directed toward the object of their thoughts, toward what they focus their attention on in this ritual or practice. Naturally, a church, as a gathering place for many people, especially on certain days of the week, at certain times, naturally attracts people with their own energies, which are released through their prayers, feelings, and everything they experience while there. These energies contribute to the formation of the Christian egregor.
What is the formation of a Christian egregor? It is to support other believers who are still weak in faith; to sustain them energetically; to charge objects with the energy of the Christian egregor. In short, a Christian egregor has many goals, and they pursue those goals deemed necessary by the guardian spirits of that egregor—usually manifestations of these energies in the material world, which serve to strengthen the Christian faith.
52:17 Maxim: How can healers protect themselves from attacks by dark entities and protect themselves from these entities being drawn onto themselves?
Irina: The best way to protect yourself from attacks by dark entities is to believe that you are already safe, that nothing can harm you. By believing this, you will be under the highest protection imaginable. By believing this, your spirit will merge with the spirit of the Heavenly Father when you perform these practices, and no dark entity... But remember that if you have negative vibrations in your soul, you will already attract that negative entity with your vibration, even if you believe you are invulnerable. Therefore, I once again emphasize the importance of spiritual work on yourself, on your negative thoughts and experiences, with any healer—this is the key to your safety and the success of your mission.
53:29 Maxim: What would you advise doing with cults and religious fanatics? What purpose do they serve on Earth?
Irina: I advise your country's leadership to introduce preventative measures to prevent the formation of totalitarian cults in the future—these measures must be taken, first and foremost, in the education system. To do this, we must instill in the younger generation the ability, capacity, and desire to think freely, to think for themselves, and to feel responsible for their actions. Because the reason totalitarian sects, like any similar societies, are created is because people are simply afraid to take responsibility for themselves, so they shift this responsibility to the leader of this or that religious cult. To prevent this, we must teach children to think independently in all areas.
What should we do with existing sects and cults? Firstly, don't ban them, because everyone should be granted freedom of religion. And for the crimes committed within these sects, the individuals who commit them must be punished. Banning a particular religious cult only attracts those already hostile to the state. And due to the well-known actions of the state authorities, there are quite a few such people among your people. To avoid attracting people to a banned religious organization, simply don't ban it. Religious organizations must be declared free, and for individual crimes committed by members of the organization, as I already said, those who commit them must be punished. Secondly, in the ideology of your society, as in education, we must do everything possible to disseminate the idea that free thought is desirable. The fact that it is very bad for the spirit and leads to its degradation, when a person follows someone, for example, following fashion - this also teaches one not to think independently, that is, all these small manifestations of herd mentality, which lead to the formation of totalitarian cults, must be eradicated in society by all means.
What should be done with religious fanatics? What should members of his family or society as a whole do?
Maxim: To his family members.
Irina: If a person with a fanatical religious stance has entered your family, the first thing you should do if you want to help them in this situation is to absolutely not try to change their minds or forbid them from attending the meetings of their usual religious group. This will only provoke anger toward you and distrust in your words. All you can do is lovingly explain to them that just as they have the right to choose their faith, you have the same right, meaning that under no circumstances should you use violence.
57:46 Maxim: What is the Creator's plan for Earth? Does the spirit reach a certain stage of development, after which further growth is impossible?
Irina: No, the process of spiritual development is as infinite as the Creator's own mind. We see only those stages that are visible from our position. The Creator's plan for the Earth is the same as for the entire Universe—to give spirits (His children) the opportunity to grow and develop through the material world, carrying the light of His love through matter (to put it very simply)—in all the ways devised by the mind given to us for this purpose, so that we can properly manifest this light of love.
58:44 Maxim: Why do you think people tell fortunes at Christmas and Epiphany and is it allowed to do so?
Irina: People tell fortunes at Christmas, Epiphany, and other times—to learn about their future or just get a hint about it. Usually, this is done out of fear of it; out of fear that something will go wrong. Of course, there are all sorts of reasons: simply out of interest, curiosity, and so on. But I'm talking about a more common reason...
Is it okay to do this? I can't forbid or condemn anything here. I can only say that if you do this, you must understand exactly what you're doing and why. And I want to reiterate that the future is multifaceted, and if fortune-telling is used to instill fear in someone about a negative prognosis and motivate them to take certain actions to avoid a negative future, and so on, then this is misuse. But if such techniques are used for self-exploration, for example (all of this is analyzed and logically sorted into its components), then it can also have a positive effect.
1:00:18 Maxim: How to learn to heal yourself?
Irina: Good question. Well, to learn to heal yourself, first, you need to understand the cause of illness, the root cause of disease. In your world, it can be both spiritual and physical, because just as the physical body influences the spirit, so too does the spirit influence the physical body. To a certain extent, the spirit can overcome the physical causes of its energy, meaning it can maintain a healthy physical body even in unhealthy physical conditions. But you must always remember that the body's resources are not limitless. And you must also remember that even a spirit that lives in the light of love can become ill from a variety of physical conditions, and it would be wrong to consider any illness, for example, a sign of insufficient spirituality. This is absolutely not true. The same illness can have many causes; different people can have many causes.
How can you learn to heal yourself? To be healthy, you need to maintain harmony in your physical body, psyche, and spirit, and most importantly, avoid negative experiences and emotions. Then you will be more resilient, more resilient to the difficult conditions your physical body may experience.
1:02:18 Maxim: Does karma exist and does karma influence illnesses?
Irina: Karma exists as a result of the actions you committed in past lives. But it's important to remember that karma continues to develop in this incarnation, from the moment you begin making conscious choices. Karma is the result of conscious choices in this and previous lives.
How does it affect illnesses? Are you referring to congenital ones or those acquired here?
Maxim: Let's start with the innate ones.
Irina: As I've already said, the spiritual qualities developed in a past life influence personality traits, that is, their character. And all of this can have a significant impact on the physical body. How does this happen? I'll give you a very simple example: if a spirit experienced a lot of negative emotions in a past life and became accustomed to them, it will descend to a lower level of the spiritual world. And then, having incarnated in a new life (in a new body), it will begin to infect it with its negative vibrations. At the event level, this will manifest itself in such a way that from childhood, this child will be irritated by everything, even the ordinary words of their parents; they will have no desire to do anything useful or creative. Even if born into a good family, a spiritually developed family, a family of intellectually developed people, they will strive to escape. For example, at school, they will tend to fall in with bad company - this will be because they are irritated by the correct words of their parents and teachers at school. All of this occurs due to low vibrations, and all of this, of course, has a destructive effect on the body, because when this child begins to create new karma for themselves, they also create it for their body. By showing disrespect, hostility, and hatred towards others, this child, and later the adult, provokes a corresponding societal reaction to their behavior and actions—that is, the same rejection they themselves experience. This rejection, this societal reaction, evokes negative emotions in them... And these negative emotions create physical illnesses in them, which are dependent on stress factors.
1:05:32 Maxim: Is a nuclear war on Earth possible and what will be the actions of the Interstellar Union in this case?
Irina: Yes, of course, it's possible... Although most representatives of the Interstellar Union hope this will never happen on Earth; that reason will ultimately prevail over the animalistic laws of struggle within your power structures. The Interstellar Union's actions in this case will be to take all measures to quickly halt military action and eliminate radiation contamination (if possible). If this is impossible, the Interstellar Union will resort to open mass contact. Again, with the goal of disarming the aggressors and, if necessary, transporting people to already established bases beneath the Moon and Mars (if radiation contamination is severe).
1:06:44 Maxim: Does the teaching of the modern Orthodox Church differ from Christ's original ideas? If so, how exactly, and does the text of the modern Bible correspond to what its authors wrote?
Irina: Are we talking about the Russian Orthodox Church?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina: The fact is that, unfortunately, I must admit that the translation of certain terms (some words written by the apostles into Russian)—while well done—was done by people who understood the true meaning behind these words. But this true meaning is not always explained to ordinary parishioners of the Orthodox Church. And this, I believe, is a major omission on the part of those pastors who currently serve in the Orthodox Church. The teachings of Christ in the Orthodox Church generally correspond to what Christ transmitted. But, naturally, we must remember that the very formation of the Christian Church took place under conditions of pagan resistance. Many rites, sacraments, and rituals were created after Christ, after the time of the apostles, taking into account the influence of pagan religions... So that the energy previously directed by followers of pagan religions could be channeled into a new, already emerging Christian egregor. For example, it was precisely for this purpose that the celebration of the Nativity of Christ was introduced on January 7th, rather than on the day of his birth. This was done deliberately to replace a holiday (for example, the birth of one of the Roman gods).
And does the translation correspond to the Bible? As I already said, the Bible translation, although accurate, is far from universally understood. What surprises me most about the leadership of the modern Russian Orthodox Church is that it makes no particular effort to explain words and expressions in the Bible and its translations that are unclear to parishioners. Personally, I would like to see more education on these issues, because some doctrines preached in the Russian Orthodox Church lead away from the Christian path rather than lead to Christ. But these doctrines naturally arise from a misunderstanding of the translation, which was made from the original Greek. For example, this happened with the word "metanoia," which means repentance. In fact, more needs to be done to explain to people that this is not simply a request for forgiveness of sins, but a genuine change of mind. And one more thing... I am very surprised by the Orthodox Church's attitude toward esoteric and occult practices. The apostles themselves, when writing the New Testament, used specific terms... When they criticized certain types of occult practices, they used specific terms, and I am surprised that these terms are now applied to all followers of these teachings, even though this was not included in the text. This is what happened, for example, with the word "pharmaks," which denoted a person who harmed people using magic and poisonous plants. In the Russian Bible, it is translated as "sorcerer," and on the basis of this word, all those involved in magical practices are now criticized. Although all people who engaged in magical practices were called "magos" in the Bible, and they are not condemned for their practices. Why this is not discussed in the modern church? I am also surprised... And I can give several more such examples.
1:11:47 Maxim: Why are there so many religions on Earth? And was it right to establish one religion on Earth?
Irina: It's impossible to establish a single religion on Earth. For the simple reason that if you try to establish one, anyone who doesn't resonate with it (its teaching that it is the Truth) will adhere to it only hypocritically, under fear of punishment, and this will only lead to spiritual degradation. I repeat once again: it's better to adhere to no religion at all than to adhere to it for the sake of the opinions of others. Because sincerity, love, and faith are the main conditions for success on any religious path. That's why there are so many religions, because a single religion for earthlings is impossible at the current stage of development.
1:13:00 Maxim: Does a person have free will or is all people controlled by God?
Irina: As I've already said, freedom is one of the great gifts of love our Father has placed in each of his sons, each of his children, each of his rays... The fact is, if God were in control of everything himself, he wouldn't need to give himself commandments, or to disobey them, or to punish himself. Well, not to punish, but to discipline himself... That's a pointless exercise, and it's not inherent to God's supreme intelligence.
1:14:12 Maxim: For whom was the Epistle to the Seven Churches written in the Revelation of John the Theologian?
Irina: The thing is, the Christian egregor then had, and still has, seven guardians. Every religious egregor has its own guardian spirits. And, naturally, the Christian egregor has angels, seven of them. And Christ's words through John were addressed to the seven angels—the seven guardians of the Christian egregor.
Do you want to know why Christ didn't directly address these angels then, but did so through John the Theologian? He did this deliberately so that these words would be recorded in his books and become the property of all believers, to warn them of the dangers of any deviation from the path to him and of the rewards that await every believer who sincerely loves him and follows his path.
1:15:37 Maxim: What is the correct way to pray to God our Father? Can we pray to Christ and the saints? How can we know they hear us?
Irina: A very good example of a prayer to our Heavenly Father was given by Christ Himself when He was asked, "Teach us to pray." This happened during the Sermon on the Mount in Israel, and this prayer is now known to you as the "Our Father." This prayer addresses the Heavenly Father, acknowledging Him as Father; it also expresses the wish that the Father's will be fulfilled; it acknowledges that He is Holy. The word "holy" comes from the word "light," meaning that He is the Light that dispels all the darkness of ignorance and malice. It also addresses the Father with a request for food. Why is this request given? Not because the Father needs to be asked to give food (and He does not want to give it), but because man recognizes that all food, all matter, belongs to Him. And it also asks for protection from temptations, for protection from evil spirits. Why is this request for protection necessary? Because by reciting it, a person acknowledges himself as a son, that is, he acknowledges that he is the "offspring" of the Father. He needs Him: His love, His protection (just as a child needs the love and protection of his earthly father). This is also important, because by acknowledging this, people struggle with their pride, for example. Some find it difficult to admit that they need someone's protection. And we must remember that this prayer, "Our Father," is not only optional, but rather a model of prayer.
How should prayer be structured? Naturally, there are no templates; each person has the right to address the Father: mentally or aloud, however they deem necessary and important at the moment, recognizing that He hears... That the Heavenly Father is everywhere with His energy; that He hears us everywhere: our thoughts, our words, and we can address Him even in the simplest words. Words aren't necessary. We can simply tell Him as if we were a family member—our closest friend, our father, our mother—about our experiences; about what's troubling us, asking for help, thanking Him, and so on. In other words, the more we love the Heavenly Father, the easier it is for us to communicate with Him.
Is it possible to pray to Christ and the saints? The very word "prayer" signifies an appeal to the spiritual world—not just to the Father. Since Christ and the saints live in the spiritual world (many of them do), praying to them is naturally also possible. If we are referring to Christian saints, then they exist in the spiritual world and, through the Christian egregor, they receive... They hear us and understand, well, not in Russian, of course, but at the level of thought forms (all our requests and wishes to them). And we can pray to them too and address them in our own words. But not as God the Father, the Creator of all things and our Father, but as our brothers and sisters who simply exist in the spiritual world.
Maxim: How do we know if they can hear us?
Irina: Usually, a believer who senses the spiritual world and feels God won't ask, "How can I understand?"—they already know. So, this question is for someone who doesn't sense the spiritual world.
If you don't feel the spiritual world, how can you know if the saints are hearing you? Only experience will help here, your own personal experience of praying; the feeling of being heard—this comes with experience. Even if you don't feel it yet, you are praying. Simply do it sincerely, with love, and gradually these feelings will come, because the Christian egregor will give you the energy of faith (if yours is weak).
1:21:20 Maxim: What is the Holy Fire, and where does it come from in Jerusalem on Easter night?
Irina: Well, that's exactly what I was talking about—it's precisely the manifestation of the energy of that very Christian egregor, which is given to strengthen faith and attract non-believers. That is, naturally, the energy of the Christian egregor: it is directed in large quantities, it is directed into the temple, and it is directed in such a way that it can cause a material fire, that is, a combustion in the material world. And the energy of any egregor: it is spiritual. But if it is in large quantities and directed by certain spiritual forces (in this case, Christian angels), it can cause the release of energy from atoms, that is... What is combustion? It is the release of two types of first-level energy from atoms of heat and light. And in this case, this spiritual energy itself, which came from the egregor, is what does this. In plain language, it gives rise to heat and light, that is, it releases them from material atoms, with its own effect.
1:23:23 Maxim: Who decides on what basis a person was or was not a saint?
Irina: In the Christian Church, the Orthodox Church, and the Catholic Church, there are special people who deal with this issue. This is done so that by declaring a person a saint, their life and deeds become an example for other believers and so that the energy of those praying to them is channeled into that very Christian egregor.
On what basis do they make this decision? These are specially trained people who are well versed in the theory and practice of Christian life. That is, they know the sacred scriptures, the sacred traditions, and they themselves live the Christian life. That is, they pray, observe the sacraments, and are active members of the Christian church. On what basis do they make this decision? First of all, I want to emphasize that the decision to declare someone a saint is made only after a person's death. Once a person has died, those who believe them to be a saint turn to special people in the church who question these people, and those around them, about the extent of their Christian life (what they did for the people, what they did for God). And they decide whether they are a saint or not based on their actions, which are known to them. And their decision depends largely on their understanding of holiness in general. But we must remember that many who are truly holy, who have gone to God, who have ascended to higher spiritual levels—they are not included in the church's list of saints because it is impossible to include them all (many are unknown). This is the answer to the first question, and the answer to the second…
The remains of saints. The fact is that (as I mentioned earlier, when discussing the sacrament of the Eucharist), the Holy Spirit, through the sacrament of the Eucharist, through the body and blood of Christ, transforms not only the spirit—that is, cleanses it of negative vibrations—but also transforms the physical body. He transforms it in such a way that a person's own spirit begins to manifest itself more clearly, and, naturally, the divine spirit (since they worship it). It is believed that after death, after parting with the spirit, the Holy Spirit remains in the physical body; that is, the energy of the Holy Spirit remains. And through this energy of the Holy Spirit, its various actions are manifested, just as through any Christian relic: through an icon, a cross, and so on—these are also material conduits of divine energy, and, naturally, the energy of the Christian egregor through which it passes.
1:26:55 Maxim: Is Christ himself satisfied with the modern Christian religion? And does he have any wishes for his followers on Earth?
Irina: I want to tell you that Christ feels each of you: each one who energetically shares his body and blood. As for whether he's satisfied with the state of your religion, the state of your churches—well, only he can say that. Because, in all my conversations with him about this, he's never expressed any direct dissatisfaction with earthly civilization in general (let alone religious organizations). He's generally more inclined to be in a joyful and happy state of love and merging with the Light. I've never seen him express dissatisfaction with anyone or anything, even when he was humiliated on Earth.
Mirach Count is in direct mental communication with his Teacher, that is, with Christ. He has now mentally addressed your question to him, and Christ has given such an answer that he wishes to remind all people on Earth and each of his followers, especially of his words when he was on Earth: "...to be perfect: not like himself, not like a patriarch, not like any saint, but like the Heavenly Father himself; and the highest perfection is in love." And he wishes to emphasize through Mirach Count that without cultivating this love, all your religious rituals—prayers, sacrifices, offerings, and even death for the sake of faith—are of no value.
Maxim: Would you like to personally convey something to earthlings?
Irina: Yes, I would. (Yes, of course, I give you permission): “People of the Earth! I wish to address you with the Good News that not a single bright thought, not a single warm feeling, not a single yearning of the soul for the light is wasted in this dark and gloomy world, as it may seem to you when you live here. When you come home to the spiritual world, to your eternal home, you will appreciate the significance of all your good deeds, even those you do not notice now, in the present moment. I wish you to learn to appreciate every moment of your life here and now. Goodbye, dear friends, and once again I congratulate you on the feast of the Nativity of Christ. Until next time!”
=== cutting ===
Maxim: Look there, she definitely doesn’t have a microphone in her ears?
Irina: I even have two whole microphones...
Maxim: They're all worried that she has microphones in her ears and someone is telling her what to do.
Irina: You answered that... Someone wrote: "Does she have headphones?", and Maxim wrote: "Yeah, an astral earphone."
Maxim: But when debaptizing people, if he was already baptized, there was no question either.
Irina: What is this debaptism? We need to explain it to him first... They completely misunderstand (she says) what baptism is: they think it's a ritual, but it's not. A ritual is a human action, but in response to that human action, energy from the spiritual world is directed, which then changes the person's aura. And this effect cannot be reversed, because even the Creed states that baptism is a one-time thing.
Maxim: So, it turns out they are deceiving people, like debaptizing them?
Irina: They're not intentionally deceiving, they're not doing it intentionally. They just don't understand what it is... They don't know that the energy comes from the spiritual world.
Maxim: Oh, Mirakh Count, how you smell...
Irina: He came up to you.
Maxim: And I just have this feeling - I’m just... I’m even vibrating all over.
Irina: What, are you also looking at the piece of paper or something?
Maxim: Well, is everyone ready?
Irina: Yes, of course, we are ready.
Maxim: Who is present with us besides Mirakh Count and Mid?
Irina: These are not humanoids - these are plasmoids.
Maxim: Is this hers?
Irina: Uh-huh.
Maxim: Mirah Count, is it true that some contactees on Earth who contact Archangel Gabriel are contacting you specifically?
Irina: Yes, there are such people.
Maxim: We decided to ask questions to...
Irina: ...to Archangel Gabriel.
Maxim: ...To Archangel Gabriel. That's it, we'll be excommunicated right away. Mirach Count, how should I introduce you?
Irina: Mirach Count, imagine that. Archangel Gabriel is more of my official name. A function, a profession, so to speak. And my name is Mirach Count. So as not to confuse Orthodox people in general with the connection between Orthodoxy and esotericism, you can simply say Mirach Count, representative of the planet Burkhad. Well, Christ lives (you already said) – he's his disciple. Just a disciple. I mean, he took his mother on the ship.
Maxim: So Mirach Count took Mama Maria?
Irina: Yes, Maria.
Maxim: To the ship?
Irina: Yes, he told her... Do you remember the Annunciation?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina: The Gospel of Luke, chapter three... What are you laughing at? (laughs, stands)
Maxim: And he took Maria on board the ship?
Irina: He said to her: "Hail Mary, the Lord is with you, blessed are you among women, blessed is the fruit of your womb, for you have borne the Savior of our souls." Well, she didn't give birth, but what will you give birth to?
Irina: See how tall he is? Look at how tall he is in general.
He says: "...you just need to connect with the light now and everything will be fine." (I sat there, connected - now it seems fine. He showed me again what it looks like.)
Maxim: So, has the recording been going on for a while? Fine...
Participants: Irina Podzorova, Maxim Rusan, Mirach Count, MidgasKaus
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/bytie-yahve-ehlohim-vethij-zavet
Cassiopeia #68 Mirach Count (Archangel Gabriel). Genesis, Yahweh, Elohim, Old Testament, Second Coming of Christ
00:00
Vladimir : Good afternoon, Irina, good afternoon, Maxim!
Maxim : Good afternoon.
Irina : Good evening.
00:12 Presentation of conference participants.
Vladimir : My name is Vladimir Venetsky, I wanted to ask Archangel Gabriel a few questions today, and I understand that he is already here and waiting for us.
Irina : Hello! Good evening! My name is Irina Podzorova, I am a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, and today we are joined by a representative of the planet Burkhad – Mirakh Count, one of the guardians of the Christian egregor, known in this egregor as Archangel Gabriel.
01:14 Criteria of Being and Non-Being.
Vladimir : Because I live in Israel, I was very interested in learning Hebrew specifically for the Old Testament and reading the Old Testament in its original language. And I'll have a lot of questions related to this. I'd like to begin my questions with metaphysics—with general questions that probably interest everyone.
So, the question is: What is it to be? What is the criterion of Being? And why is there anything at all? Why shouldn't there be anything at all?
In our understanding, the primary criterion is the cause-and-effect relationship—between cause and effect. The criterion of Being… What does it mean to “be”?
Irina: "To be" means to exist in reality. Why doesn't Non-Being exist? Because everything that exists is one form or another of God's manifestations, and since God, by His very nature, besides being Light, Love, Truth, and so on, He is life, and life is absolute Being. Therefore, since nothing else truly exists besides Him, Non-Being doesn't exist either.
02:46 Independence of time from perception.
Vladimir : Is it possible to say that time is identical in free will?
Irina : What do you mean by time in this context?
Vladimir : In this context, I call time an opportunity to choose, that is, for a person, time is the moment at which he chooses.
Irina : In any case, this will be true only from the position of the perception of this or that consciousness, but time can flow in the material world without the participation of the perceptions of consciousness, it is independent of perceptions.
03:33 About the absence of usual time in the Spiritual World.
Vladimir : I've heard that in the world of Angels there is no time. How does consciousness perceive itself as timeless? How does it perceive the world we live in from the outside?
Irina : Are you asking about that place or state of the universe where the very distinction between place and state is erased? In your Russian, it's called the Spiritual World. There, time, as we know it in the material world, truly doesn't exist. By time, I mean the flow of changes in material substances from one state to another.
Vladimir : Does the past exist?
Irina : Time is the capacity for change. This capacity is precisely what the Spiritual World lacks: there, everything remains forever unchanging and eternal. The material world is seen from the spiritual world as a kind of unification of what you call "past, present, and future." All these times, experienced by spiritual beings embodied in the material world, and experienced by all material objects, are, for God, a simultaneous present.
05:25 Contacts between Earthlings and representatives of Tumesout, the longevity of Adam and the birth of the Nephilim.
Vladimir : Next, I will say from memory... The first passage was this: “And God said: I will no longer give the Spirit to my Adam, because he is basar...” (written in Hebrew - “flesh”), “...because he is flesh, and his time will be one hundred and twenty years.”
So, there's an Old Testament scholar named Maor Rubilinu. He claims that the word "shagram" appears there. Is it a specific word, denoting some special process of transferring from the being called Elohim to earthly people a certain ability for longevity, which has since ceased? So, "shagram" is like a human fluid that was transferred from Elohim to people, to Adam, that is, to humanity, and thus, his life was extended... or is it a matter of how it was translated into Russian?
Irina : Do you mean the text from Chapter 6 of Genesis?
Vladimir : Yes.
Irina: It spoke of Yahweh when he inhabited the body of a Tumesoutian. He told Moses a story about how, even before the war that occurred 12,000 years ago, there was a time when one of the peoples living on Earth at the time made contact with representatives of Tumesout. Some representatives of the Interstellar Union were against such direct contact, which resulted in the birth of the Nephilim—people taller and more adapted to life on Earth, in the sense that they were stronger than other tribes, possessing greater physical strength and a developed brain. And some representatives of the Interstellar Union feared that the genetics of these Tumesoutians, which had been further infused into humans, would become dominant in these people and in their genes. And from them would come peoples who would then conquer other peoples who had not received this genetic information. There was a fear that these peoples would find themselves in an unequal position.
Vladimir : Were we talking specifically about physical contact between Tumesoutians and earthly women?
Irina : "They took wives" is described in Russian. If you look at the Hebrew term, there's a term used specifically for marriage: "...and their days will be 120 years"—that's how Moses was told that the Interstellar Union doesn't recommend extending this experiment beyond 120 years.
09:46 Old Testament violence and violation of Divine commandments.
Vladimir : Thank you. The next question is related to the fact that the Tanakh (Old Testament) contains a great deal of violence committed in the name of Yahweh, in the name of God. In one of his messages to the German contactee Erbert Viktor Speer, Ashtar Sheran said that much of what is written in the Old Testament (Tanakh) is incorrect, that is, added later. In particular, he cites an example from the Book of Exodus, chapter 32, verses 26-28: “Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp and said, ‘Who is the Lord’s? Let him come to me!’ And all the sons of Levi were gathered together to him. And he said to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God of Israel: Put your swords on your thighs, and go through the camp from gate to gate, and slay every man his brother, every man his companion, and every man his neighbor.’” And the sons of Levi did according to the word of Moses, and about three thousand men of the people fell.
So did this happen or not?
Irina : Vladimir, please explain to our listeners the reason for this war within the Israeli camp. We know it, but viewers may not.
Vladimir : I'll start with verse 23: "They said to me, 'Make us a god who will go before us, for we don't know what has become of Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt.' And I said to them, 'Whoever has gold, bring it.' And they gave it to me; I threw it into the fire, and out came this calf. Moses saw that the people were unruly, for Aaron had allowed them to be unruly, to the shame of their enemies."
And then what I have already read...
Irina : Yes, I understand... Let's put it this way: Moses and Aaron were the leaders of the Israelite people, leading them from Egypt to a new land. Is that right? If they were leading them to another land, could they allow the people to rebel against them?
Vladimir : This is a theoretical question and I don’t have an answer to it…
Irina : But the rebellion was such that they no longer recognized Aaron and Moses. Why didn't they recognize them? Because they made the golden calf, and this was done after they received the corresponding commandment.
Vladimir : Yes, but they received the commandment “Thou shalt not kill”?
Irina : Yes, but before the commandment "Thou shalt not kill," there was another commandment about not making images. And they did so in defiance of the commandment, which means the sin of deviating from this commandment arose. And yet they had previously agreed: the entire nation had sworn to observe it. They deviated from what they themselves had acknowledged—after all, they were adults. They could have chosen not to acknowledge and follow Moses, but to return to slavery in Egypt. They voluntarily followed them. They violated the one commandment they had sworn to—meaning, they acknowledged that they would always fulfill it voluntarily. And by deviating from it, they expected that the commandment "Thou shalt not kill"—one of the same Ten Commandments—would also be observed in their regard. But one could have expected that if they violated one of the commandments of this Law, then measures would also be taken against them that violated a commandment from the same Law. That is, an adult should have anticipated this development before making a calf and worshiping it, contrary to the oath they themselves swore. It was rebellion.
Vladimir : Actually, this is in line with church tradition. Church tradition, of course, accepts everything written on faith. But Ashtar Sheran said…
Irina : It's not like church tradition. If Moses and his defenders hadn't done what they did, those who went against the commandment wouldn't have been able to do what Joshua and his followers did. They would have been traitors. You understand what kind of people they are, who, in a difficult moment, betrayed the commandment they themselves swore to follow. Could they really be relied upon in the coming war for Palestine?
Vladimir : Yes, and what about the war for Palestine?
Irina : These were the laws of wartime. In any case, it was a very difficult time, when every person's loyalty was crucial.
15:32 The Old Testament as a realistic depiction of the events of that time.
Vladimir : Thank you. Does this mean the Old Testament is exactly as it should be and contains no conjectures or additions?
Irina : The Tanakh describes the humanity and the people that existed at the time of contact with the Tumesoutz and at the time of the formation of this nation; it describes the Israelites' own apostasy from God Yahweh many times. It doesn't say that the Israelites and Jews were the best of nations; it describes the people's apostasy many times. And it provides a realistic depiction of what the nations were like at that time. Everything is described as it was, and the apostasies, vices, and sins of the leaders and priests of that time are revealed.
16:32 On the truth of the Masoretic text.
Vladimir : Today in Israel, there's a project called the "Bible Project." Its purpose is to restore the original text of the scriptures. We look at the text and see traces of "edited scars": for example, Yahweh was added to El Elyon, etc. How can we know that the Masoretic text truly contains the Truth and hasn't been corrected or distorted?
Irina : Your spiritual leaders of modern Judaism can only know this from the fact that this is a true text, or even a retelling of it; they can only know this based on the Truth they hold within themselves, that is, reading it with their understanding of God. Remember that many Levites who lived during the time of Moses and later, during the time of David and beyond—having passed into the world of disembodied Spirits—can reincarnate again, including on Earth, becoming spiritual leaders of modern religions, including Judaism. If any of your spiritual leaders wishes to know for sure whether their Spirit was alive at that time, they can ask their mentors from the Spiritual World. I am referring to the Spiritual Advisors from the 22nd level.
18:41 On the unified meaning of the ancient scrolls of the Dead Sea and the Judean Desert.
Vladimir : I understand that there is an Old Testament and it is true. Then another question arises. For example, the Qumran Scrolls were discovered, along with the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Judean Desert Scrolls, and they are slightly different.
Irina : In fact, after the Babylonian captivity, many records of priests and scribes circulated. But even if a few words or punctuation marks differed, the meaning was the same. The main thing isn't keeping the words unchanged—that's practically impossible over centuries—but preserving the meaning inherent in these texts. The meaning inherent in the text about Moses' war of right-wing suppression of the rebellion and what was originally embedded in the sixth book of Genesis, where aliens aren't called aliens: they are called Angels, for example, Elohim, gods, and so on. That is, practically, cosmic terms about space and contacts were encrypted under mythological religious names... But the meaning remained the same.
20:08 About the name Yahweh and the prohibition on its frequent pronunciation.
Vladimir : Thank you. How do you pronounce the tetragrams: Yahweh, Yahu, Yehu?
Irina : The closest I hear to the sound in Russian is Yahweh.
Vladimir : What does this tetragram mean?
Irina : Do you mean that he himself invested when he called himself Moses?
Vladimir: Yes, that too.
Irina : This was the name of that Tumesoutz who came to Abraham to form his people.
Vladimir : Because when Moses asked him directly, "What is your name?" he said, "Ie she Ie" - "I will be, who will be" - that is, "leave me alone, I will not tell you anything..." He did not tell Moses his name directly right away. Why?
Irina : He told him about it later in the conversation. He told him this in person when he was with him on the ship.
Vladimir : Why was it forbidden to pronounce his name? There's even a commandment to that effect: "In vain."
Maxim : But we didn’t answer the previous question about Yahweh...
Irina : These questions are connected. If you look at what it meant in the Tumesout language, Hebrew is a simplified Tumesout language. Yahweh meant "Merged with the One Light"—that's a rough translation. What was called in one word there is a whole phrase in Russian. That's probably how it would sound.
Why can't this name be pronounced except during services, in church, and in sermons? Because the purpose of these commandments was to form a unified people and a unified religion, monotheism, since monotheism implied the worship of one God. But in order to cultivate reverence for this God in Jews, it was decided that they should not pronounce this name in everyday life. They become accustomed to it, meaning it ceases to have a sacred, holy meaning for them. Sacred meaning is when the name of a deity is imbued with a special significance, the pronunciation of which attunes a person to higher vibrations. In everyday life, this effect is not achieved; that is, the vibration hardly changes. This is another such commandment: it contributes to the strengthening and purification of the developing egregor.
24:08 About Yahweh's wife and relatives.
Vladimir : There's a place in Israel called Kuntillet Ajrud. Archaeological excavations there uncovered 17 blessings in the name of Yahweh and his wife Asherah (other sources mention Yahweh's wife, Anat Yahu). Was he married?
Irina : On Tumesout - yes, he had a wife on Tumesout.
Vladimir: Who are Asherah Ve Anat Yahu?
Irina : It’s like his children, relatives, brothers…
25:02 On the reasons for the formation of the cult of the goddess Astarte.
Vladimir: Why was there an idol of Asherah in the temple?
Irina : Astarte? I'm saying that this name could have become fused in the people's minds with the goddess Astarte. Well, naturally, Yahweh pronounced it slightly differently in his conversations. He pronounced it similarly under Moses, and he spoke of it to Aaron, the Levites, and so on. This could have spread among the Greek class of ancient Israel, and then this name could have become fused with the goddess Astarte, and thus a cult arose. In any case, the goal of the formation of Judaism was to create a monotheistic religion, that is, without goddesses.
26:18 About Elohim and many other Old Testament names.
Vladimir : In the Tanakh Scriptures, Elohim is plural. Everyone already knows this, and besides Yahweh, the same name Elohim is also mentioned by: El, El Elyon, Kush, Kamosh, Milcom... Who were they all? Were they brothers?
Irina : There were many who were mentioned under this word. That is, Elohim is translated as "gods," as "god" in Russian... The god of any people could be called this: Baal, Baali... In any case, they were called "aliens."
Whether they were brothers or from other civilizations was completely irrelevant. Or even some kind of plasmoids. In any case, for the Israelites, all of this is Elohim in their language.
Vladimir : They, including Baal, whom you mentioned, were they related to Yahweh or not?
Irina : Are you talking about Baal?
Vladimir : Baal, El Elyon, Kush, Kamosh, Milkom... There are about 28 more or less different names mentioned there...
Irina : They were all brothers. Not just brothers, they were all from humanoid civilizations; many were deified plasmoids, probably like Baal. You know that he was depicted with a bull's head—this is a trace of totemism, characteristic of prehistoric plasmoid cults, and he was also called Elohim. What is a plasmoid? It is an embodied Spirit in a subtle body, deified by people, to whom sacrifices were made so that it could feed on the life force of these victims. That is, when an animal or a person is killed (as happened with Moloch), life force is released from them for the plasmoids, which feeds them. And naturally, human sacrifices were forbidden by the same commandment "Thou shalt not kill," but animal sacrifices were abandoned, dedicated to Yahweh for the construction of a new egregor. Plasmoid was related to Yahweh. Generally speaking, whether they knew each other in the Spiritual World is entirely possible, but that would have to be asked of Yahweh. He is currently in the body of Jesus Christ on Burkhad. For example, I didn't ask him about Baal, whether he knew his Spirit.
29:23 On the connection between Elohim, Yahweh and the Anunnaki.
Vladimir R: Thank you. Is there a connection between the Elohim, the Annunaki, and the Greek and Roman pantheons of gods? All of these entities are described in various cultures.
Irina : People call different beings "Anunnaki." Who are you referring to?
Vladimir : Which were in the Sumerian civilization.
Irina : Describe the representative you have in mind?
Vladimir : I know that there are pantheons of different gods: Greek, Roman, Annunaki, and so on.
Irina : The Anunnaki could have been a generic term for all aliens; it could have been the name of coalitions of them, individual civilizations, or even teams of scientists in different mythological systems; even priests from two neighboring temples could have been called Anunnaki, meaning completely different beings, which is why I asked for clarification. Regarding Yahweh and the Anunnaki: if we understand all representatives of the Anunnaki by Anunnaki (as many do), then, naturally, Yahweh was one of them. If we're talking about a representative of the reptilian race (some call the Anunnaki that), then Yahweh wasn't from Selbet or its colony. He was from Tumesout—an anthropomorphic race, and he's not a reptilian. If the Anunnaki are the name for the team of scientists who shaped your race—yes, he was one of those teams; he participated in the formation of your people, your race, and he can be called that.
As for the pantheon of Greek and Roman gods, they included a wide variety of beings, including deified aliens from outer space and plasmoids. There were even cases (and there are many) where people were deified—great rulers, healers, sages, teachers, and even those who had accomplished some heroic deed: winning a war, saving someone from a fire, and so on. Stories of these deities were passed down orally and in writing, from generation to generation. Gradually, these individuals were endowed with an aura of divinity.
Maxim : Can I ask a clarifying question, because I'm genuinely interested in this topic of the Annunaki? So, am I correct in understanding that anyone could be called Annunaki, including those very same groups and coalitions of scientists who studied some cosmic civilizations? So, anyone who has ever come from outer space, or had an interest in space, or in esotericism, could be called Annunaki. So, Annunaki is a very broad term, correct?
Irina : This is a broad term, and the approximate translation is heavenly inhabitants.
32:57 About people working for the Annunaki and the extraction of minerals on Earth by aliens.
Maxim : Then a question about the reptilians: was there ever a time on Earth when the reptilians tried to control people to extract minerals, or not control, but hire people to work for them so that they would extract minerals, and did the reptilians need minerals?
Irina : Do you mean the period before the war?
Maxim : Yes, the period before the war. So, could people work for the Annunaki?
Irina : They could have been building bases. They might not have worked, they might have collaborated with and helped those same Anunnaki, that is, those who built these bases. I don't think they were specifically used for mining. Using humans for mining is inefficient; robots were used for that. What one robot can do, for example, in one hour of work? Only 500 people could do that in one hour. It's inefficient, first of all. Civilizations that could travel hundreds of light years in a matter of minutes wouldn't have done that. Wouldn't they have come up with a non-manual way of mining?
Maxim : Were there large-scale mining operations by aliens here on Earth?
Irina : To build bases and, for example, for starships, they mined carbon—the kind in the form of graphite. And to build bases, they needed metals, that is, to make the base's shell. Anything that didn't have to be transported here from other planets was mined here. Because that's the rule in the Interstellar Union: if the necessary material exists on another planet, it's easier to mine it than to waste energy transporting it.
35:15 About Nostradamus and his vision.
Vladimir : Where did Nostradamus get his revelations?
Irina : These were his visions of the time in which he had lived before. In some rare cases, a Spirit can incarnate by stepping back in time—not forward, but backward. That is, his reincarnation will be in the past for him, and the Spirit of Nostradamus in his past life lived in a time that was the future for that Nostradamus. And since he lived, some fragmentary memories remain: of what happened to him, of his studying the history of the centuries. But I want to add that he himself didn't fully understand the origin of these visions, and he made up much of it himself. Even without remembering these events, he put them together himself: analyzed them, pieced them together from fragments, and then somehow synthesized them into a whole, as best he could.
36:37 On disunity in the modern Christian church.
Vladimir : Is today's church what Christ intended? What fundamental changes need to be made: which dogmas are patently false, which dogmas are missing, and is it necessary to go to church?
Irina : So many questions. Let's break them down like this: Is this what Christ intended? Does he think anything needs to change, and is it necessary to attend a modern church?
I spoke with him about this. If we look at the overall spiritual state of all Christian denominations that make up the one church (I'm now referring to all those who recognize Christ as God or the Supreme Being in their religious beliefs)—I call them all Christians, representatives of the one church—then these aren't exactly the denominations Christ intended when He created His church here. Firstly, because of disunity, that is, the words of the Apostle Paul that "all things must be one, the church as 'one Father and Son in the Holy Spirit...'"—modern church leaders ignore these words. Because of their pride, everyone clings to dogmas, to letters, which seems ridiculous... As Omar Khayyam said: "One clings to the letters in every line, neglecting the Spirit of love, which constitutes true life in Christ..." But in reality, this does not lead to Christ; it does not lead to salvation in the sense understood as the transformation of human nature—into a spiritual one, the raising of one's vibrations. Because seeing only the letters in every line makes one an atheist in the Soul, as Omar Khayyam rightly noted. And here our humor is simple: we laugh at precisely such a simple exposition, at the fact that the great spiritual Truth can be expressed so simply, that the formalism and dogmatism of any religion completely destroys its inner content. But about such people, Christ said, even on Earth, "You with your Pharisaic Spirit, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees..." He was referring not to the teachings of the Pharisees, but precisely to this Spirit. Leaven is the Spirit in this case, that is, a state of consciousness. And with this Pharisaic Spirit, you circle the world twice, only to make an infidel twice as bad as you. So what do these words of Christ mean? They are in the Gospel, but unfortunately, few people pay attention to them these days. And few Christian leaders think they can be addressed to him. What does "make an infidel twice as bad as you" mean? Christ was saying precisely that, "before his conversion, this person was closer to God than those who converted him." This can happen, and it happens quite often, and this is precisely what grieves the Spirit of Christ. In any case, this is not what He intended on Earth. That's the first thing.
41:07 The Church's attitude towards esotericism.
Irina : Second, this discrepancy with Christ's expectations lies in the fact that in contemporary Christian practical spiritual life there is very little of that very Spirit of Love. And the spirit of conviction, of sin, which speaks in too harsh and crude language, "without love," is strong—this only repels the sinner and sets them up for the idea that they are not accepted, that they are not needed there. And in the contemporary Christian paradigm, instead of reassuring them and engaging them in a loving exploration of the faith, they say, "Well, fine, go and perish. We don't need people like you here—dirty and impure—with the sins you have..." That is, unfortunately, something like this is often encountered. I wouldn't say it's everywhere, but it is quite common. And this repels those who could be transformed through Christianity.
And again, Christ is astonished by the attitude of modern Christian leaders toward esotericism, toward what is called esoteric spiritual knowledge, esoteric practices, healing practices, and so on. Christ is surprised why Christian leaders deny all these abilities to comprehend the Spiritual World and denounce these people. Moreover, while living on Earth, he never uttered a word against these people. On the contrary, he said that man can do nothing unless it is given to him from heaven—meaning God. That's the first point.
Second. Then the Pharisees told him, "You cast out a demon by the power of the devil..." He said, "Satan cannot cast out Satan"—meaning that evil cannot cast out evil. Christian leaders have forgotten this and now think that dark forces can cause illnesses or other things. They have forgotten this commandment of Christ, as well as others. This is what the church lacks in this case: unity, love, and a reconsideration of these concepts of theirs, which expose esotericism and contradict the words of Christ.
44:30 Motivation for attending church.
Irina : Whether or not one should attend a modern church is a very personal question, and I will answer it this way: if you sincerely believe in Christ, that He is God; that He is the Savior; if you love Him and want to be in His church, to perform its rituals, then, naturally, you can and should attend. By doing so, you raise your vibrations, because there you experience the bright feelings of worship of Christ; by performing the sacraments, by performing the rituals, you raise your vibrations. But if you already attend, you do not look at the church ministers, not at their sins, not at the sins of other believers, but compare yourself only with Christ. Therefore, even if you see a priest or a believer behaving unworthily, you do not become their judge. As the Apostle Paul said: "Who are you who judges another man's servant? To his own Master he stands or falls..." Remember that you do not have the right to judge as Christ did. Because they, Christians, serve him, not you. In this case, be careful to stand before him "in a state of purity," and any judgment will lead you out of it. If you see injustice, unlove, or lack of mercy in a church you still want to attend, then your proper response is to first pray for this person to God, who acts in such a way contrary to the Christian's understanding. Then, if you want to open the person's eyes to their behavior, you can approach them alone, lovingly, and carefully discuss it, without in any way demeaning them as a person.
46:56 About the second coming of Christ and the entry of the Earth into the Interstellar Union.
Vladimir : What do Christ's words mean: "One goes, one remains"? That is, when will He come again?
Irina : We're talking about the Second Coming of Christ here—a mass contact, during which Christ, along with the Burkhadians, will arrive on Earth to lead it into the Interstellar Union. He wants to be personally involved. And he believes that the true fulfillment of the precepts of Christianity will facilitate humanity's entry into the Interstellar Union. "One is taken—one is left"—meaning that not everyone will be equally ready to join the Interstellar Union. It's not that Christ will take one and leave the other—it means that some people will still deny the need for it. There will be an argument, a struggle, that is, a difference of opinion: one will go to greet him with joy, while another will remain and say, "Maybe not so," "it's not right," or "we don't need this"—this kind of struggle will occur.
48:27 About resettlement to other planets.
Vladimir : So there won't be a migration of good or bad people to other planets?
Irina : This will only happen when Earth joins the Interstellar Union. Before that, Earth will sign an agreement obligating it, like all planets, to abide by the rules and laws of the Interstellar Union. And the separation of good from bad will mean that if someone on Earth subsequently commits a serious crime that requires isolation, they will no longer be isolated on Earth but sent to a special planet for criminals, just as criminals are treated on planets of the Interstellar Union.
49:26 Concepts of life in the Spiritual world.
Vladimir : Christ said, "The children of the age to come shall neither marry nor be given in marriage, and there shall be no more death, and they shall be with me throughout eternity." What does it mean, "they shall neither marry nor be given in marriage"? We remain in the body.
Irina : Yes, we remain in the body, but where it says, "They neither marry nor are given in marriage," it refers to life in the Spiritual World. It also says, "They dwell as angels in heaven"—that is, "in heaven" is not the physical heaven, but the Spiritual World. As you know, the first use of this word in the sense of "Spiritual World" is in the first verse of the first chapter of Genesis: "And the Lord made heaven and earth"—that is, first the Spiritual World and the material world. So here, "in heaven" refers to the Spiritual World during the period when the Spirits who reach the highest level of the Spiritual World, like Angels, are high-vibration Spirits, that is, the Spirits of the disciples. If they follow Christ's commandments, they will end up there with the other Angels. And they don't marry there, in the sense that they are Spirits there, and when they live in the Spiritual World, naturally, they don't marry, because there's simply no need to do so without a material body, as angels do in heaven. And regarding "death will not exist and will continue throughout eternity"—here again, two different concepts are meant—again, for those who have already reached the highest levels, such as "having become like Christ in holiness in the Holy Spirit." For you, this will be like the 24th level. You can't imagine anything higher than that, because for you, that would already be the Super-God. That is, there will be no death at all: not in the physical sense, but a different kind of death is meant here.
52:00 About spiritual death.
Irina : Do you know the concept of spiritual death?
Vladimir : Yes.
Irina : You know, spiritual death is separation from the source of life. For such people, while they exist in a state of eternity, outside of time—that is, in the Spiritual (not the material world)—it's natural that they won't die, won't be able to descend into lower vibrations until they incarnate again. Naturally, then this opportunity arises for them, because the material body is changeable; that's why the material world was created: so that Spirits can change in one direction or another.
52:50 Black holes as a clot of gravitational energy.
Vladimir: Another question, then, which is of more interest than others in the Zariman era, is black holes. Information is lost in black holes. When something falls into a black hole, does it have a singularity? What happens beyond the event horizon? Does a black hole emit thermal radiation? What happens to information, in the physical sense of the word, that falls into a black hole?
Irina: A black hole, from the perspective of the Interstellar Union's science in space, is a collection of gravitational energy. It accumulates because all other energy levels present in these atoms have been expelled from the matter that previously comprised the black hole. As I remind you, according to the Interstellar Union's teachings on nature, atoms possess three energy levels. The first level is what you call heat, light, electricity, magnetism, and radio waves. The second is what you call radioactivity and thermonuclear energy. And the third level is what you call microgravity, the force that attracts all atoms together and holds them in a dense state; and macrogravity is what allows planets and stars to revolve around each other and allows objects to remain on the surfaces of planets. These three energy levels are present in the atoms of all elements, including those that make up stars. And the energies of the first two levels I mentioned can be knocked out of the stars' atoms, displaced. But the third level remains and, in your earthly language, is compressed into a point. And what was once a star becomes invisible to your eyes: it no longer emits the flux you call photons and so on; what we call the first energy level has already been displaced. In the language of your physics, it is a collection of pure gravitational energy.
What happens to matter when it gets there? Matter in any form, both in the form of elements and in the form of energy. If what we call dense matter gets there in the form of atoms, and we call even the most rarefied gas, that is, anything composed of atoms, dense matter. If this type of matter falls into the sphere of attraction of this gravitational clot, which you call a black hole, then the atoms will also release energies of these two levels that I mentioned. Some energies will be released and will be noticeable to an external observer. Some will not be noticeable, but they will still be released, and gravitational energy will remain in these atoms. It will become part of this black hole, that is, its gravitational energy will increase. But if it is not subtle matter and what you call energies and various fields that gets there; if it is simply energy that gets there, then it will not only be transformed, but it will be transformed into what you call gravitational energy. But if a being you call a plasmoid, that is, one embodied in a subtle-material body, were to enter the center of a black hole, its body would not be destroyed by the passage of the black hole, unlike a dense-material body. Upon reaching the center, it could, using the accumulated gravitational energy, leap, as our gravitational engines do, to the center of another black hole, located in another galaxy or within the same galaxy—this is called "instant teleportation." This is an effect of gravitational energy. But only a plasmoid in a subtle-material body or, naturally, a being in an astral body—that is, a spiritual being—who is unaffected by gravitational energy, could accomplish this, because the two types of energy would simply be knocked out of the atoms of dense matter, and neither the body nor the ship could withstand this.
59:27 About atoms and rays of ultra-high energy.
Vladimir : Thank you. Physicists are tormented by the question of the origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays or particles possessing ultra-high energy. No one can understand where they come from: they cannot be confirmed in a laboratory, that is, by repeating such experiments, nor described as a cosmic event as we understand it. Where do these atoms and ultra-high-energy rays come from?
Irina : I want to ask: what energy do you call ultra-high? This is if we use the known vibration spectrum.
Vladimir : We're talking about joules. I can't give you a figure right now, but it's the number of joules a particle possesses. That is, to impart that much energy to a particle, you need to hit it with an identical particle with the same energy. It's a vicious circle. It's unclear where this all started.
Irina : It could be anything, really, and I need to look at these studies. And not measure it in joules, but in vibrational frequencies, that is, what you call wave oscillations. What you call a joule is the amount of energy that can heat something. It depends on many energies, because you're used to measuring energy using heat. For us, it's not just that: we measure it differently, mainly by measuring vibrational frequencies, that is, the oscillations of the medium when a particular wave appears. What do you call ultra-high energies? Compare it, for example, with known energies that you don't call ultra-high, so I can get an idea of how different it is from other particles you know?
1:02:12 About ultra-high energy particles - neutrinos and protons.
Vladimir : We're talking about several orders of magnitude: particles that have energy that's many, many orders of magnitude greater than ordinary particles, than those emitted by stars, from supernovae... You could be referring to neutrinos, for example.
Irina : What you called neutrinos—we call them the same gravitons, but they relate to macrogravity and are emitted from matter. But you call those emitted at a certain rate neutrinos. If they were emitted at a different rate, you would call them something else. You don't have a single name for portions of energy—quanta, like we have a graviton and several other particles. That is, for each energy—we have a name for it and for its smallest portion. But you, receiving the same energies but in different proportions, simply call them by different names.
Vladimir : For example, the energy of a proton is thousands of megaelectronvolts. Physicists can't understand this—it's all a mystery. Where did it come from?
Irina : Where do they come from? The same stellar processes can produce gravitons: the formation of new stars, the transformation of stars into black holes, explosions, the transformation of stars into supernovas, the transformation of stars into pulsars, and many other galactic processes.
1:04:20 About scientific conferences with Maxim Kotofeev.
Maxim: We have a conference with Maxim Kotofeev, and there we discussed precisely those questions that our science can't answer. It covers precisely these kinds of questions about energy very well and in detail: the transition of one energy to another, the problem of our science's inability to distinguish, accept, and separate many types of energy, where we can call the same thing by different names and calculate it differently. Please take a look at it; it covers in great detail precisely the questions that our science can't answer. Maxim Kotofeev is specifically working on this topic; four conferences have already been held there.
1:05:22 The connection between dark matter and dark energy.
Vladimir: There's a theory about dark matter and dark energy—they're different things. Dark matter is a certain structure that doesn't interact electromagnetically with the ordinary matter we perceive, and the Universe formed from this matter: it flowed into the structure formed by this matter. What is its nature? What is dark matter?
Irina : What you call dark matter and what you call dark energy—they have a similar nature when they form. But in our terminology, these are parts of the universe you don't perceive, parts of the spectrum you don't perceive, which we call plasmoid worlds—or rather, not all of them, but some of them. You perceive their presence, but you can't distinguish them with either your senses or your instruments. You don't yet have the instruments for this.
Vladimir : Is there a connection between dark matter and dark energy? Scientists theorize that dark energy is what's causing the universe to expand. Unlike dark matter, this dark energy is distributed evenly throughout the universe, and thanks to this energy, the universe is expanding; otherwise, it would collapse due to gravity.
Irina : Generally, the material world consists of 59 levels of density. We, embodied in the dense-material world, are at the third level of matter density: solid, liquid, and gaseous—three states of matter. Everything higher in vibration, that is, above gas, is another 56 levels, which make up the bodies and worlds of plasmoids. There are dozens of times more of them than humanoid civilizations; they exist on planets, among stars, in the chromosphere of stars, and in interplanetary space, interstellar space in general. Dark matter is made up of lower-vibrational plasmoids.
Dark energy is already of a higher vibrational level, but you still don't perceive all of it. Some you can't even call matter or energy; they're completely imperceptible to your normal senses until you, naturally, leave your body. Then your astral body, your Spirit, will have access to all levels, up to the 56th, because the astral plane has already entered there, and it's even higher in vibration.
Vladimir : Thank you. Then I won't ask any more questions...
1:08:25 On the unification of physics and esotericism.
Irina : Finally, I'd like to say that the study of the physics of the Universe and the study of biophysics—that is, the physics of man, the physics of life on our planet, as well as in the Interstellar Union—is impossible without the study of the Spiritual World, because it is the Spiritual World, the Spirit, that generates matter in all its forms and interactions with each other through the world of energy. Therefore, both dark matter and dark energy, which are inaccessible to your understanding, will become more accessible if your scientists and esotericists unite in a single zeal for the study of the Universe and develop programs for visiting these worlds in the astral body, through astral travel.
Vladimir : I'll take advantage of the opportunity, because I may never have another chance like this—to speak with Archangel Gabriel. Archangel Gabriel, what advice would you give me, Volodya Venetsky?
Maxim : Volodya, don’t you want Irina to visit you in the astral plane?
Vladimir : With pleasure. But mine is a mess…
Maxim : In your head? (laughs)
Vladimir : And in my head too.
Maxim : Irina can visit you with Archangel Gabriel. She'll see your mentors. If you'd like, we can even look at your previous incarnations, that is, certain aspects. Is there anything you'd like to know about yourself?
Vladimir : Something spiritually useful.
Maxim : Where did you incarnate from? Do you want us to find out? Like, your previous incarnation?
Vladimir : Yes, I want to.
Irina : From what level?
Maxim : From what level – let’s count some more?
Irina : Tell us your date of birth, we’ll quickly calculate it now.
Vladimir : February 14, 1976.
Further information about Vladimir is strictly personal, and we cannot disclose it without his consent. We respect the confidentiality of those who seek help from our project.
And, as per old tradition, we'll now show an interesting moment in the middle of this Skype conference recording:
Irina : Give me something to drink, please.
Vladimir : You have a hard job.
Maxim : Yes, especially when they invite people from that level, that is, the Burkhads – such a high-vibrational energy…
Vladimir : Irina gets very tired, you can tell from these conferences.
Maxim : If only you knew how much she works a day?! She shouldn't have had a conference like that, meaning she should have been resting by 10:00 PM, because tomorrow she has to get up at 8:30 AM and go to the gym...
Vladimir learned a lot personally at this conference. The CASSIOPEIA project is designed for every person on this planet. And we are open to collaboration and feedback, both from ordinary people and from scientists in any field. We are confident in our contacts and in those who connect with us. I am confident that many of you will find this very interesting and useful, especially for the development of our civilization as a whole.
Participants:
Irina Podzorova - contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations;
Maxim Rusan – head of the International Center for Spiritual Development “Cassiopeia”;
Mirakh Count - representative of the planet Burkhad, keeper of the Christian egregor (Archangel Gabriel);
Vladimir Venetsky is a guest from Israel.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/pryamoj-ehfir-s-osnovnym-kuratorom-proekta-arhange
Cassiopeia #486 Live broadcast with the main curator of the project - Archangel Gabriel (Mirrakh Count)
00:00 Start of video.
00:03 Principles of posting videos on the Cassiopeia channel.
Maxim: Dear friends, hello everyone. I'm starting this broadcast again, as always. Yours truly, Maxim Sergeevich Rusan, head of the Cassiopeia Project. We've completed another week of training, and we have a lot of exciting new news for you.
The first piece of news will likely come as no surprise to some. As the Project Director, I've decided to remove two videos from our channel: the first is "Prince Vladimir," the Baptizer of Rus', and the second is "Stepan Bandera." I'd like to apologize to all our viewers for trusting us and watching this video.
However, due to changes in Russian legislation, as well as the tightening of the fight against extremism and the justification of fascism, I, as a lawyer, after consulting with my friends, have decided not to risk the entire project and to remove these two videos from our channels. I hope you understand.
No one exerted any influence on me. I made this decision on my own because I thought the video had extremist overtones. Plus, when Stepan spoke, he never apologized; he justified himself. Our government, unfortunately, doesn't yet regard esotericism as a science, so even though Stepan Bandera was the one conveying the information, it turns out that Irina was the one conveying it for our government.
This circumstance could impact our project. Irina relayed Stepan Bandera's words justifying his actions, which could be equated with justifying fascism, Nazism, and much more. Therefore, I decided to remove these two videos.
So the news, of course, isn't very good. Indeed, the videos were very open, very revealing. They were transmitted by the Spirits who participated in those events.
Why did you remove "Prince Vladimir"? You know, frankly, there's a huge amount of information there that, in my opinion, seriously denigrates the honor of a man who was elevated to the rank of saint by our Russian Orthodox Church.
And I, as the Project's director, also made this decision. I am baptized and Orthodox, so I considered these videos undesirable for our channel. And I am confident that this step will protect our entire project from potential destructive influences from our law enforcement system and our agencies. Therefore, once again, I apologize to all our viewers, but as a lawyer, I understood that this had to be done.
08:10 Presentation of participants.
Maxim: Today's broadcast. We wanted to invite Nostradamus. When we made the request, it turned out that Nostradamus is currently incarnated on the planet of the "Order of Six." These are reptilians who interact with people on the astral plane and destructively motivate them to self-destruction. Nostradamus, unfortunately or fortunately, is currently incarnated there. We didn't risk hosting the broadcast without his consent, because the information would be distorted.
We decided to invite our main Curator of the Cassiopeia Project, Mirah Count, a representative of the planet Burkhad (Burkhad is one of the planets of our creators), who is described in our Christian religious egregor as Archangel Gabriel, to the broadcast.
I'll give the floor to our wonderful Irishka, our "gold of the party," our "scarlet flower." And for now, I'll probably just play the monster. Have a seat, Irishka.
Irina: Good evening, dear friends. Hello. Greetings to everyone.
I congratulate you on the feast of the Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Maxim: Yes, by the way, I also congratulate you on the feast of the Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Irina: We are starting the broadcast.
Today, with us is the Curator of our Project and patron of the Cassiopeia egregor (it's already a separate egregor, although three years old, it's quite powerful), Mirakh Count from the planet Burkhad. On Earth, he is better known by his Spiritual Name, Archangel Gabriel. He has been incarnated on the planet Burkhad for over six thousand years and, among other things, oversees our project.
Greetings.
Maxim: Mirah Count, I greet you. I'll call you Mirah Count. It's more familiar to me.
Irina: Good.
Maxim: I remember our first meetings and acquaintance, about three years ago.
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: After talking to you for a long time, I asked you to make a video and answer our questions. In that video, you introduced yourself by your Spiritual Name. I was shocked. It all didn't make sense to me. I couldn't quite put my finger on it: what did Archangel Gabriel have to do with it, and what did Mirah Count from the planet Burkhad have to do with it?
Irina: When you asked, he answered, "Archangel Gabriel." And you asked, "Who?"
Maxim: Yes, I asked, "Who?" and turned off the camera. I remember that clearly. For a long time, I was worried about how they would react to us with this information.
I thank you for your support, for your help in shaping the entire egregor. I consult with you a lot. You give me good, practical advice, which I try to follow. Of course, I understand that I don't always do it right, but I try to do it as best I can.
Irina: You and I were incarnated together, and Irina too.
Maxim: I already understood that one big gang is crawling all over the Galaxy.
Mirah Count, I want to ask the first question.
Oh, by the way, dear friends, you can post your questions here on YouTube. We have a live Q&A chat. I'll be checking it out too. Maybe there will be some interesting questions there.
12:50 Archangel Gabriel on the Feast of the Dormition of the Most Holy Theotokos.
Maxim: The first question I'd like to know the answer to is: Today is the great feast of the Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Please tell me why it's called the "Dormition of the Virgin Mary," and what makes this feast famous? Why did it become a feast day, and what special events happened on this day?
Irina: Yes, indeed, it is a holiday. In Old Church Slavonic, the word "Dormition" denoted the transition to the Spiritual World. A holiday is a significant event. This holiday commemorates the moment when the mother of Jesus Christ, known as Mary the Mother of God in the Christian religious egregor, left this earthly world. This is how it is celebrated in Christianity.
In fact, something else happened. Mary, known as the "Most Holy Mother of God," left her physical body on that day (she was already quite old, but still had sight, hearing, and a clear mind), but her connection with it remained intact. She fell into what you might call a coma. Her breathing and heartbeat were practically nonexistent, but she was nonetheless alive.
This state lasted (he demonstrates) for five days. In this state, she met her son, his phantom, in the Spiritual World. They agreed that his mother, the Mother of God, would not sever her life thread, but would return to the body with his help and travel to the planet Burkhad, where her son was already located.
I took part in that operation myself, and I remember it well. By that time, her body was in a cave (shows the cave). People buried her, thinking she was dead because she wasn't moving. They checked for signs of life, but didn't notice any breathing. This had happened often before. When we flew in for her, the area around the cave where her body lay was deserted; there was no one around. We entered the cave by moving a rock (shows) with an antigravity beam.
Maxim: Was she also buried in a cave that was covered with stone?
Irina: Yes. That was the custom. Many famous, wealthy people were buried this way in that country. In this case, her funeral was paid for by Jesus' disciples, who collected a donation.
We took her onto the ship, brought her to the planet Burkhad, and began restoring her body there. She didn't have an injury, but rather low energy in her vital organs due to age. There were no serious illnesses. I participated in the medical examination and restoration of her body. Despite her age, there were no serious pathologies. She lived for another three hundred years using the technology on the planet Burkhad. Then she left this incarnation.
Maxim: She lived with her son Jesus, it turns out?
Irina: On his island (shows) Maria had a separate room, a separate house, white.
Maxim: She was incarnate for another 300 years?
Irina: More precisely, 297 Earth years.
Maxim: And who made the decision for her to leave the incarnation?
Irina: She herself.
Maxim: She herself?
Irina: Yes. She said she now needed to be in the Spiritual World. From there, she would be able to better care for the already well-established Christian religious egregor. An era of persecution of Christians, whom she viewed as her beloved children, was approaching.
Maxim: Thank you.
18:28 Archangel Gabriel about his incarnations.
Maxim: Archangel Gabriel, please tell me, are you incarnate now, correct?
Irina: I am incarnate.
Maxim: Why do they call you "Archangel"?
Irina: Because I am on level 23.
Maxim: Your Higher Self, your Spiritual Self, is on the 23rd level? How can this be explained? How is this correct?
Irina: And my Higher Self and I.
Maxim: Your Higher Self and you.
Irina: Yes, we are one. But, you could say that now some part of my Higher Self has shifted to the 24th level, because I am in the transition to it. When I emerge from this incarnation, my level will be whatever I reach by then. But right now I am on the 23rd level. I incarnated on the planet Burkhad on the 16th.
Maxim: From level 16?
Irina: Yes. It was 6026 years ago (shows the number 6026).
Maxim: Valery, if you're writing that I'm ruining everything, then please clarify what it is I'm ruining. I'm trying to ask questions.
Mirah Count, please tell me, have you ever been incarnated on Earth?
Irina: Yes. I have incarnated on Earth 32 times, but at different density levels.
Maxim: 32 times incarnated on Earth?
Irina: On different levels of density. Physically speaking, I've incarnated three times. But that was before the war.
Maxim: Before the war 12 thousand years ago?
Irina: Before the war, 12 thousand years ago, I incarnated on Earth, three million years ago.
Maxim: Please tell us who and where you incarnated?
Irina: I incarnated as Teraksis. He was a man who lived approximately 600,000 years ago. He was a city builder, an architect, on the territory of your Kola Peninsula. This was where the Arctic Ocean used to be. There used to be a lithospheric plate there, but it later subsided (the Kola Peninsula is part of it), and there was no ocean. I lived there.
Maxim: And the second incarnation on Earth in dense material form?
Irina: My second incarnation on Earth was approximately 210,000 years ago. I incarnated as a young woman who lived in the area where the peaks of the Himalayas now stand. Back then, the mountains were much lower (gestures), like hills. They rose up due to the impact of Selbet's special weapon, which destroys planetary cores, on the core. This woman (gestures) lived amidst nature, carrying water in a jug.
Maxim: And the third incarnation?
Irina: And my third incarnation was literally before the war. I didn't live to see it. A little over 13,000 years ago. I was incarnated in the city you call Atlantis. I lived quite a long life, about two hundred years, at that time. I was a priest who served the gods (he shows how he lights some incense; he has a beard).
Maxim: I understand. And what about your previous incarnation? You're 6,000 years old by our Earthly standards, aren't you?
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: Where was your previous incarnation?
Irina: I was incarnated on Venus at the 19th level of density.
Maxim: On Venus at the 19th density level?
Irina: (Archangel Gabriel) I participated in the cleansing. This occurred approximately nine thousand years ago, after the war with Selbet. At the 19th density level, I participated in the primary cleansing of the planet's atmosphere by influencing the elements that were causing atmospheric degradation (deteriorating its quality for living organisms) by directing etheric energies at these elements, which disassembled these atoms into quanta.
Maxim: Tell me, please, during the war 12 thousand years ago, where were you incarnated?
Irina: When there was a war 12 thousand years ago, I was not embodied.
Maxim: Have you been to the Spiritual World?
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: You were looking from the outside, from the point of view of the Spirit from the Spiritual World? Yes?
Irina: (Archangel Gabriel) Yes, since he was not incarnated.
I learned about this from the Spiritual World.
Maxim: Thank you.
I'll ask you some more personal questions because people are interested. Please tell me, do you have a family, children?
Irina: Yes. I have a family, a wife. We've been living together for about four thousand years (demonstrates). We have four children. These are Spirits who agreed to incarnate through us.
Maxim: I see.
24:40 Archangel Gabriel about Jesus Christ.
Maxim: Tell me, please, when Christ came to incarnate, did you know in the Spiritual World that he would come to Earth, and that you would help him?
Irina: Yes, I knew him. I'd known him for a very long time (demonstrates). From the perspective of the Spiritual World, I'd known him for eternity, I knew him. When he incarnated on the planet Tumesout, I was already communicating with him. I communicated with him (demonstrates) from the Spiritual World.
At first, I communicated with him from the Spiritual World. When he incarnated on the planet Tumesout (this happened about five thousand years ago), I was already incarnated on Burkhad and flew to him.
25:47 Archangel Gabriel on the egregors of various religions.
Maxim: Tell me, please, what was the purpose of the formation of the Christian religious egregor?
Irina: Raising the planet's vibrations by raising the vibrations of people who become Christians through the Christian religious egregor. Spreading the pure energy of Jesus Christ's Love to Christian believers through the sacrament of confession and communion. This raises the vibrations of not only the Spirit but also the body. As I said, under the guise of bread and wine, a person energetically absorbs the blood and flesh of Jesus Christ, who resides on Burkhad and constantly raises his vibrations to help a person dissolve blockages in the astral and etheric bodies and their traces in the physical body. To transform the body. He absorbs it into the digestive tract, and everything is distributed through the blood (demonstrates).
Maxim: Interesting question. What is the Archangel Gabriel's relationship to John the Baptist?
Irina: We are all spiritual brothers (Archangel Gabriel). John the Baptist, as has been said many times, is Archangel Michael.
Maxim: They write that the body of the Mother of God disappeared from the cave five days after it was placed there.
Irina: He was just telling me about it. They took her to Burkhad.
Maxim: So they took Jesus Christ. Am I right?
Irina: Yes. Only the goals were different. Jesus Christ's goal was to completely restore his body, to resurrect it.
Unlike Maria, his life thread was severed. To return to his body (which he was able to do with his divine energy), he had to alter the DNA information in every cell of his body, making him immortal. The body doesn't deteriorate from age or illness. All of that is switched off for him.
Maxim: Tell me, please, how many Archangels are there in the Spiritual World?
Irina: Very, very many. Millions, considering that Archangels are the Angelic Teachers or Angelic Mentors of the 22nd, 23rd, and 24th levels. As I already said, beyond the 24th level, they continue indefinitely.
Maxim: I understand.
Tell me, please, they ask whether Muslims can turn to Archangel Gabriel, and did you participate in the formation of the Muslim egregor?
Irina: Yes, of course. I know the founders of the Muslim religious egregor well. Although I'm not its direct curator, many Muslims turn to me. It depends on a person's faith. If they love me and send me the Light of Love, they will tune into my wavelength, regardless of their faith.
Maxim: They're telling us we have questions prepared. No, guys, the questions are not prepared. Look here. See the piece of paper I'm trying to write down? There are no questions. I didn't prepare for this broadcast. I confess. I admit I should have prepared, but I didn't. I'm trying to improvise, figuring out what questions people will be interested in. I'm reading your questions that you ask here on the YouTube channel, in the Telegram chat "Q&A. Live." Don't worry, the broadcast is not prepared.
30:19 Archangel Gabriel about earthly time.
Maxim: Gabriel, please clarify. Is earthly time energy? If so, what kind of energy is it?
Irina: It's not so much energy as a flow of energy change across all the elements of the earth and their relative motion. It's a change in energy.
Maxim: It is a change of energy, a flow of change of energy.
Irina: And not just one local change in energy, but a flow of these changes that goes from the past to the future.
Maxim: Guys, about the three days of darkness. If you're looking for scares, listen up. And should you be afraid, should you wait for the three days of darkness? Of course, wait.
31:10 Archangel Gabriel on contacts with young civilizations.
Maxim: Archangel Gabriel, please explain: many are saying there will soon be three days of darkness. How can you, for your part, explain this information? They are predicting three days of darkness.
Irina: On my planet, Burkhad, I am a sociopsychologist and political scientist. I specialize in building religious egregors in the worlds of young civilizations. A young civilization is one that has not yet crossed the threshold of freedom from violence between sentient beings.
Therefore, I know well that words like "three days of darkness" and other expressions convey certain images. These images almost never have their literal meaning.
In this case, pay attention to the word "three." Three days of darkness: this means that the person to whom this information was transmitted (a specific contactee received it) was warned by the curators that a time in the future might come when events around them could lower their vibrations, because they perceive everything negatively. The word "three," the number 3, signifies action. Essentially, they were told, "Make sure your actions are not dark." And they perceived this as "three days of darkness."
Maxim: I understand. Thank you, Archangel Gabriel.
Irina: Yes. A good image.
Maxim: That's a good question. Is there a ban on transmitting information to earthlings?
Irina: There's an agreement, a Code of Interaction with Young Races and Contactees, if we're talking about the Interstellar Union and the Galactic Federation of Light, which have long been guided by this Code, this agreement. The Code prohibits the transmission of information that could negatively impact a contactee, their environment, or Earth's civilization as a whole.
For example, it is forbidden to transmit information about any technologies for which this civilization is not ready. It could fall into the wrong hands and cause harm to the contactee.
It is also forbidden to transmit information that will in any way discredit the contactee in the eyes of people.
It is also considered incorrect to transmit information to a contactee about other contactees with the Interstellar Union or with other civilizations, regarding who they are contacting and what kind of information it is, without requesting it from the contactees themselves.
Maxim: Conventionally speaking, there are prohibitions, but they are regulated by the safety of the contactee himself.
Irina: The safety of the contactee, as well as the laws of ethics and the safety of those around the contactee. For example, if the contactee has a falling out with someone and asks their handler for a recipe for some poison that can't be found on Earth, it can't be given. I just gave an example.
Maxim: I'm just taking notes. I'll ask a question now.
35:30 Archangel Gabriel on prayer.
Maxim: Archangel Gabriel, please tell me how you pray to God?
Irina: In my heart, I immerse myself in His Light. I don't need words for this; it's an instant mental adjustment. As soon as I descend into my heart, I see the Source of Light there and mentally merge with it. I begin to see myself in everything and everything in myself.
Maxim: Why can’t people do the same?
Irina: Why can't they?
Maxim: Can they?
Irina: Of course. I've seen many contactees who also merged with the Light within themselves. They call it prayer. But it's called "inner prayer." You can pray without words, just with images. You can pray with intention alone. You can pray with words, but understand different meanings behind them. Or you can pray externally with words, but internally be far removed from their meaning.
Maxim: Tell me, please, are you depicted on icons with a white lily.
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: What does this mean? Some of the first icons I had at the entrance to my house were of Archangel Michael and Archangel Gabriel. I was always amazed: in the icon, you're wearing blue clothing. Incidentally, blue is the color of the Cassiopeia Project. I only just realized that.
Irina: And the Matrix of Burkhad.
37:10 Archangel Gabriel on symbols and types of contacts with earthlings.
Maxim: And a white lily. And what does the white lily in your hand mean?
Irina: Even in pre-Christian times, the lily was a flower of hope, because it was dedicated to the gods and goddesses who healed people and brought them hope. It was a delicate, fragile, and very beautiful flower, containing a vibration that gives hope to the human soul. Already in Christianity, it became a symbol of the Good News that I brought to the Mother of God, that she would embody the Son of God, that is, the Firstborn Son of God. They began to draw me with a twig in my hand, although I came to her without one. It's such a symbol.
Maxim: You communicate with Archangel Michael, right?
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: Why does he have a sword in his hand?
Irina: He is not embodied now.
The Spiritual Sword. What is the "spiritual sword"? The spiritual sword is the image of a ray of Light of divine Love, which separates falsehood from truth, darkness from Light, evil from good, and renders the existence of falsehood, darkness, and evil illusory, only apparent in the Light of truth, love, and kindness. When Archangel Michael pierces the surrounding darkness with his sword, the dark entities begin to understand that this darkness is merely their own invention, an illusion, and that they are, in fact, beings of light.
Maxim: Thank you. That's an interesting question. Is it true that fire signs are not allowed to wear a cross?
Irina: Not true. Why? He says, "No."
Maxim: I understand. Tell me, please, are you incarnate? People in our churches pray to you, as to the Archangel Gabriel. Are they addressing your Higher Self or you personally?
Irina: I am one with my Higher Self, so they speak to me and to my Higher Self simultaneously. And I feel their prayers in my heart, not as words, but as a stream of Love, which makes my heart blossom, because I feel a surge of strength and inspiration, Love, and I send it back to them.
Maxim: Tell me, please, how is it possible to receive so many people at once, to distribute the flow of Love, to respond to them, and to help them? Or are you creating your own phantoms? How does this happen?
Irina: Yes. I form my phantoms. I also have contacts. I have 185,000 plasmoid beings in contact.
Maxim: How many? 185,000 plasmoid beings, and you're in contact with them all?
Irina: I keep in touch with them, and they help me provide assistance to people.
Maxim: Can they introduce themselves by your name when they help people?
Irina: They can take on my image to let the person know that they came from me.
Maxim: Wait. So you have helpers? Could destructive entities pretend to be you and use your name?
Irina: Destructive entities can also assume my form, but they are easily distinguished by their vibrations and the words they speak when they make contact. Any entity can assume any form in the Astral Plane.
Maxim: Tell me, please, who made the decision to have the crucified Jesus Christ on the pectoral cross?
Irina: The decision wasn't made by the Council; it's tradition. Some crosses depicted him, and some didn't. Both are considered correct. Not depicting him is considered correct (just a cross), and depicting him is considered correct. At first, they began depicting him on crosses that were in churches. You may have seen the cross in the church, to the left of the Altar, with Jesus Christ depicted on it (this indicates the place where prayers are usually offered for the dead).
Why did they make this decision? To remind people that the blood that flows from the cross cleanses them from sin. And not only that. How does it cleanse them from sin? He shed his blood despite being innocent of the crime he was accused of, and therefore he sacrificed his life voluntarily.
It's not only for this reason that blood cleanses from sin. I also spoke about communion. So that a person understands that when they go to communion, they are partaking of the blood that is present in the wine in the form of energetic etheric vibrations of the very blood that flowed from the cross and cleanses from sin, from low vibrations.
If a person receiving communion voluntarily descends into lower vibrations, they transfer their low energy state to Christ, driving a new nail into His cross. Very figurative. It's not the physical nail that transfers energy.
Maxim: Archangel Gabriel, Mirach Count, please tell me. There are people on Earth who say they are your incarnation. A question arises: Can you partially incarnate into someone on Earth?
Irina: No. I can't incarnate. I can be a curator.
Maxim: Can you be a curator?
Irina: Yes. I am already embodied in a body.
Maxim: I understand. So, those people who say they're the incarnate Archangel Gabriel, they can be under your supervision and not distinguish themselves from you? Or how does that work?
Irina: I knew 54 people on Earth who called themselves the incarnation of Jesus Christ.
Maxim: You knew him personally, right?
Irina: I knew their Spirits, knew them spiritually. This happens because someone loves me, and they tell me, "I am your incarnation." This happens because a person can love this person so much, pray to them, identify with them, that they begin to believe they are one with them and that they are that Spirit. This is a conditioned reflex, which you call identification with someone. This happens to people.
Maxim: And exalting oneself above someone, designating oneself as some kind of famous person.
Irina: If he begins to boast that he is Archangel Gabriel before others, it's not because he felt it, but simply to be considered someone great. Anyone who truly feels like me will not boast, because my inner state, my inner love, preaches to all people that all are one and equally loved by God. Exaltation has no place here.
45:50 Irina Podzorova on communication with subtle-material entities.
Maxim: Irina, I'm going to cut you off for a bit. I want to ask you a question.
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: Do your curators disturb you when you sleep?
Irina: No.
Maxim: Do you sleep well?
Irina: Yes, of course.
Maxim: But many people think you constantly have entities, voices in your head that prevent you from living and sleeping. How do you separate them? Tell me. I'm curious. You sense a huge number of entities—spiritual, subtle, and dense—in the Astral Plane. When they all come, what do you do?
Irina: If I don't want to communicate, I say I'm not ready to communicate right now because I'm busy with my own affairs. And that's it. If some entity persistently connects with my spiritual channel, I simply send them Light and ignore what they say. Eventually, they realize there's no reaction and leave. A person controls their own contact.
Maxim: Irina, as your assistant and project manager (you're also managing this project, by the way), I've experienced a situation where there's a huge number of entities. You see, hear, and sense them all, and you don't know what to do with it.
Irina: What should I do about it? No. That has never happened. It used to be that if I spend the night somewhere where there are a lot of plasmoids, they don't know me yet, I'd start to fall asleep, and they'd make a physical noise. They'd knock something or drop something. Then I'd look up and say, "Why are you waking me up? It's better if we meet in the Astral Plane now and talk."
Maxim: Are you inviting them to a meeting in the Astral?
Irina: And they smile at me and say: “We want to play with you.”
Maxim: Oh, how interesting! I get it. You play with plasmoids in Astral?
Irina: Yes. They love to play.
47:50 Archangel Gabriel on the appeals of earthlings.
Maxim: Archangel Gabriel, Mirach Count, please tell me, what requests do people make to you, what prayers do they make, and about what do they turn to you?
Irina: Prayers vary widely. Sometimes they ask for help, sometimes they ask for gratitude. Sometimes they ask for more Love, for me to increase Love. Sometimes they ask for healing and protection, especially for the protection of children. So that I would protect children from evil and misfortune, from evil people they might encounter.
Maxim: Tell me, please, which prayers do you feel and perceive best? And who do you help most often?
Irina: I don't discriminate between whose prayers I accept and whose I don't. The main thing is that the prayer be filled with Light and Love, so that it reaches the level where I am. If someone with a low vibration speaks, it might dissipate in the Astral Plane, and I won't hear it, won't be able to perceive it.
The main thing is to pronounce it in high vibrations and with complete trust—that is, with hope in God's Will, because hope and trust in God's Will presuppose humility. But hope and trust in God's Will should not undermine your own efforts and actions to build your life and achieve your goals.
What this means is that the goal you set may not always be achieved for various reasons. It's important to understand that you are still God's beloved children. This doesn't mean God is punishing you. Perhaps it's not beneficial for you or will bring negative consequences into your life.
Maxim: Thank you.
Guys, I'm answering about the Spiritual Name. Everyone has their own Spiritual Name. Someone shouldn't tell you your Spiritual Name; you should ask your Higher Self.
No. I will not tell you my spiritual name.
50:30 Archangel Gabriel on connecting to the Christian egregor.
Maxim: Archangel Gabriel, please tell me, many sorcerers engage in destructive practices, love spells, and magic. They use the Christian religious egregor. What is your opinion on this?
Irina: Why do sorcerers use the Christian religious egregor?
Maxim: To do my dark deeds.
Irina: The energy of the Christian religious egregor is directed toward Light, Love, reconciliation, humility, and acceptance. Humility presupposes acceptance, not humiliation. Not a sense of humiliation and resignation to any blows of fate, but acceptance of this world as it is.
As for sorcerers who use it, they may attempt to connect to a Christian religious egregor to replenish their etheric energy from the egregor's vast reservoir of energies. Anyone can do this, but their vibrations must match those of this egregor. If they don't, no connection to the Christian religious egregor will occur.
The Christian religious egregor has many Guardian Angels, many bright, high-vibration plasmoids, nature spirits, and guardians. Connection to the egregor does not occur if the sorcerer's spiritual heart harbors any negativity: envy, jealousy, pride, anger, resentment, or fear.
If these feelings predominate, he won't be able to connect. However, he can connect to a black magic egregor—this is the lowest level of esoteric egregor. Magic is also a form of esotericism, a knowledge of the world through extrasensory experience. Magicians understand the world and influence it with their thoughts and energies, creating events. However, low-vibrational destructive plasmoid civilizations can connect to their energies, as can disembodied Spirits from the first six demonic levels. Sorcerers can connect to this egregor.
There's plenty of energy there. They take it for their rituals. When they take energy for their rituals, energy as the driving force of this ritual, they incur an energetic debt to the guardians of this egregor.
While debts to God and the light beings do not arise because they are given unconditionally, the dark, low-vibration Spirits who have rejected the Light do not feel it within themselves voluntarily, are not as selfless, and do not know how to love unconditionally. They write everything down (demonstrates).
Maxim: Interesting. What are they doing in churches then? I often see witches and sorcerers standing off to the side when I go to churches, doing something. What do you think they're doing there? How do you see it?
Irina: They may try to connect to the Christian religious egregor and perform various rituals. Anyone can enter an Orthodox church. The door is open to everyone. Anyone entering the church can hear a prayer, a psalm, or see an icon that will affect their spiritual heart, raise their vibrations, and make them want to abandon the activity that has brought them negative experiences. The door is open to everyone in a Christian church; it is a high-vibrational space, and the actions of these people within it are absolutely safe.
They won't be able to do anything unless the person nearby draws the influence to them through their fear or irritation. If they do, then it can be done anywhere.
Maxim: Yes, for some reason I just remembered that Irina’s book is coming out soon.
Irina: Yes.
Maxim: You can order it from Chitai-gorod; you can find it there. It's called "Diary of a Contactee." By the way, it's a wealth of information. Even the questions I'm seeing in the chat right now are answered in the book.
55:53 Archangel Gabriel about Archangels in female guise.
Maxim: Another very interesting question, often asked. Why is there no firstborn daughter of God? Why don't the Archangels have female forms?
Irina: I already said that, for example, on Earth I incarnated as a woman.
Maxim: There are no female Archangels in the Christian religious egregor. Why? What's the correct name for them? "Archangels" or what?
Irina: Angels, if we're talking about disembodied Spirits, don't have a gender. It's simply an image that reflects the body in the last life before exiting incarnation, if they're disembodied Spirits. Archangel Michael, for example, incarnated as Seraphim of Sarov (a man), or Archangel Metatron, who is now a disembodied Spirit, who (I know him very well) was previously incarnated on the planet Burkhad and was also a man.
The Mother of God—Mary the Mother of God—is also an Archangel, according to your terminology, but she is a woman, now taking on a feminine form. She is also on the 24th level, if you look at the gradation of 24 levels. If she is on the 24th, then she is an Archangel. There are such female Spirits.
Maxim: I see. In the Christian religious egregor, they are depicted as men. Right?
Irina: Yes, but the Mother of God is said to be above all the Angels. She is even considered spiritually superior to the Archangels. Nevertheless, she has a feminine appearance.
57:57 Archangel Gabriel on reaction to negativity and forgiveness.
Maxim: I'll try to read the questions from the "Q&A. Live" chat.
Mirah Count, please tell me how to react correctly to the negativity of others without getting angry and without losing my self-esteem?
Irina: React with gratitude to the negativity of others.
If you react to this negativity, it means you have hidden blocks, resentments, irritations, and fears in your heart that you haven't worked through. With gratitude. Thank this person, mentally or out loud, for the lesson. They are your teacher, and they were sent to you for a reason.
And if you feel any anger, irritation, or resentment, thank them for the lesson, for seeing it, because you're more interested in raising your vibrations than they are, and they helped you identify it. The one who verbally spoke something negative to you isn't just your spiritual teacher; they're your spiritual doctor. They're revealing your spiritual illness. And after thanking them, if you managed to say something in anger or irritation, ask for forgiveness.
The Russian word "forgiveness" is charged with energy. Its true meaning is simplification. Forgiveness is the transition to a simpler relationship—Love. To forgive means to simplify relationships, to fill them with Love. Then, when you've made peace with this person—and this is absolutely necessary—if resentment was aroused in your heart, you search for the reasons why this emotion was triggered. You ask this emotion: "What are you protecting me from? What's dangerous about these words you said to me?" And then you work through this block.
Maxim: Bueslav writes: "Ward number six." Dear Bueslav, I suggest we join the next room, number 7 or number 5. We'll be roommates.
Guys, our government is partial to esotericism, and we're not claiming to be the ultimate authority on the matter, nor are we insisting that you do what we say. We're simply expressing our perspective, our understanding.
Like me. I won't ask you to like me anymore to extend my broadcasts. We'll broadcast from the heart, and I won't beg for likes anymore. I even canceled two videos, even though they had a huge number of views, realizing that the issue isn't the number of views, it's something else.
I want to thank each and every one of you for your help. For your support, for participating in our retreats, for expressing your gratitude and sending us donations, which, as the project's director, I use to direct and develop this project. Thank you so much. I'm grateful even for simply watching and helping us. Because it means so much to me.
1:01:40 Archangel Gabriel on the formation of the egregor "Cassiopeia".
Maxim: Mirakh Count, are you saying that you, Irina, and I incarnated somewhere together? Where did we incarnate? I'm curious.
Irina: We all incarnated together on the planet Burkhad.
Maxim: And who was Irina, who was I, and who were you?
Irina: When did we all incarnate together?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina: Irina, you and I had several incarnations on Burkhad. When we were incarnated together (demonstrates), we were all men, sons of the same parents.
Maxim: What a layout! Interesting.
Irina: This was before the discovery of Earth, about 7 million years ago. The Interstellar Union already existed.
Maxim: We then agreed on what would happen on this planet that didn’t yet exist?
Irina: We agreed on this in the Spiritual World. On Burkhad, we were engaged in flights across the Galaxy. We had a family tradition: to work as discoverers of new worlds.
Maxim: I have a question. If someone had told me 7-10 years ago that I'd be leading a project like this, I would have twirled my finger at my temple and asked them, "What are you smoking?"
At this time, I am leading this project with great love and gratitude to all of you, our curators and mentors. Please tell me, was this planned: that at a certain age, I would meet Irina? Was this planned in the Spiritual World?
Irina: Yes. Your ages, the year you'd meet, and the circumstances were planned. You had to prepare for the meeting. Not just for the meeting, but also for leading the project.
You needed to prepare to manage the entire material component of the project, including various retreats and so on. Everything you know, everything you hold in your hands. You needed to prepare for this in various ways.
Irina needed to prepare to lead the Spiritual side of the project. This included transmitting information through her, which would become fundamental for building the structure of the egregor's informational component. And not just transmitting information, but connecting people with their Higher Self.
Maxim: They write: "Maxim, marry Irishka."
Irina: What is this?
Maxim: Guys, we have our own personal lives. We're spiritual brothers and sisters. We don't need to get married.
Irina: Moreover, they said that we were two brothers on Burkhad, this is completely impossible.
Maxim: Yes.
So, this was all planned in advance?
Irina: Irina needed to prepare not only to transmit information (Archangel Gabriel speaks), but also to connect people with their Higher Self. This also involves guiding the spiritual side of the project.
And not only to connect people with their Higher Selves, but also to teach others to do so. She had to prepare for this, too. Serious preparation, primarily on the Spiritual level, through the purification of her Spiritual Heart.
If she hadn't reached a certain vibration, your meeting might not have happened. And if it had, the project wouldn't have been launched. You would have felt she wasn't the right person for it.
Maxim: Yes. In principle, yes.
Irina: I didn’t understand anything.
Maxim: Didn't understand anything? I understood everything.
Tell me, please, why is this project in Russia? What is its purpose in Russia?
Irina: Good question (Archangel Gabriel smiles).
Maxim: Yes, why in Russia, why not somewhere else?
Irina: Why in Russia?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina: Because at the time the project was created, Russia had the best conditions for your development. For your development and Irina's: as the project's leader, as the spiritual figures who would develop it. An energetic trace, an imprint, had already been left in the planet's noosphere.
Maxim: Please tell me, is there a danger to the development of the project at this point in time in Russia?
Irina: Danger in what sense?
Maxim: The danger of conveying esoteric information in this format.
Irina: There's no danger in the format currently in "Cassiopeia" because you don't claim to have the truth. What do you mean, "don't claim to have the ultimate truth"?
Your program presupposes a different opinion, an alternative to yours. This eliminates the possibility of accusing you or your project of dogmatism, of controlling the masses, of denying the traditions of pre-existing religions. This eliminates the possibility of accusing you or your project of creating some kind of world, a project of your own, based on the rejection of all others. You did not take the path of "divide and conquer"; you did not divide anything. That's the first point.
The second point: you bring not only information, but also spiritual help to absolutely everyone at an accessible "payment according to the heart," and this helps ensure that you cannot be accused of profiteering.
Maxim: But we really don’t have the idea that we want to profit from anyone.
Irina: This is spiritual help.
Maxim: Yes. We provide spiritual assistance on a "pay-as-you-go basis." Anyone can come to our Center, live nearby, or live off-site and receive meals. The training we provide at the Center is "pay-as-you-go." You decide for yourself what form of payment is acceptable to you.
Irina: Moreover, even at retreats, which require a fee because they involve travel and training outside the city where the project's leaders—the contactee and the director—live. At off-site events, all the Cassiopeia project masters, including Irina, offer personal consultations and personal spiritual support, all on a "pay-as-you-go" basis.
Maxim: Everything related to spirituality is a matter of personal preference. Our wellness center operates on a fixed fee basis. But as the project manager, I've made these fees completely accessible to all categories of citizens. So that pensioners and others who can't afford large sums of money can come.
I know that many people are charging huge amounts of money these days for both esoteric and wellness services. Therefore, I would like this project to help and develop a huge number of people, so that we, as one big family, can learn to help each other and understand the structure of the Universe.
1:11:33 Address by Mirah Count.
Maxim: I'd like to thank our wonderful curator, Mirakh Count, commonly known as Archangel Gabriel, for this wonderful broadcast, for your help and support of our project, our egregor "Cassiopeia." I'd also like to express my deep gratitude for your knowledgeable and helpful advice on many issues.
Irina: I thank you too, dear friends. I (Archangel Gabriel speaks) also convey information.
I address you, dear divine Souls, spiritual brothers and sisters. We all came into the material world to temporarily fulfill our tasks, and it doesn't matter on which planet this happened or how many years we spend on this planet. What matters is what we leave with, what level we reach, and how this will impact all our subsequent incarnations.
Maxim: Mirakh Count, tell me, please, you've never been on live television. You know there's a lot of people watching right now. If you were to address them now, what would you say?
Irina: I thank each of you who is part of our egregor and the Cassiopeia Project. This project is not only Irina and Maxim's, not only mine as the egregor's mentor, but also each of you. Each of you contributes a piece of your Soul, a piece of your light energy, a piece of your material resources, which are also a form of energy. I thank you for this energy. I send you the Light of Love. I wish you strengthening of all your flows: luck, finances, health, and the fulfillment of the goals of all your incarnations.
Maxim: Thank you very much, Archangel Gabriel, Mirach Count.
I want to tell everyone. Guys, our project is not political. We no longer invite political figures.
Irina: We said that we don’t invite anymore.
Maxim: We've decided not to invite political figures. We were drawn into politics by requests to invite those who were involved in politics. We don't interfere with financial structures or pyramid schemes that defraud people.
Guys, our project is not political. You always have freedom of choice. We are not the ultimate authority. We are always ready to help in any way we can on a spiritual level, from our perspective, perception, and awareness. Thank you all so much.
Irina: Thank you.
Maxim: Until next time. Thank you for this wonderful broadcast.
August 28, 2022.
Conference participants:
Irina Podzorova - contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations;
Maxim Rusan - head of the CASSIOPEIA Project and the Center for Spiritual and Physical Development;
Mirakh Count (Archangel Gabriel) - representative of the planet Burkhad, sociopsychologist, political scientist, specialist in the construction of religious egregors in worlds where young civilizations exist, curator of the egregor "Cassiopeia", keeper of the Christian egregor.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/mirrah-kaunt-o-vojne-kak-sozdayut-obraz-vraga-dial
Cassiopeia #560 by Mirrah Count on War – How the Enemy is Created. Dialogue with the Higher Self is Key! Meditations on Peace.
00:00 Start of video.
00:19 Conference excerpts.
"...First, every person must constantly communicate with their Higher Self, and then they will not fall under the influence of the war egregor. Second, this involves influencing the noosphere, cleansing its egregorial structure of all negative energies and weakening the war egregor by creating opposing images..."
"...that is, give a person an instrument for communicating with the God within him, and he will make everything around him Divine..."
"...if you see an evil person, it doesn't mean he's guilty, it means he's sick in the Soul, his Soul is sick with malice, and you need to help him heal..."
01:39 Welcome. Introduction of participants.
Maria: Hello, dear friends! We have another meeting with Irina and our curators. Today we have a very interesting guest from Germany, his name is Heins Krug. He'll introduce himself now, and I'll translate for you. And today we have an interesting topic – meditation, an introduction to Heins and his system. He's also into esotericism, so I think it'll be a very interesting conversation.
Hines says he's been involved in esotericism for 50 years. He's particularly interested in Vedic culture. Hines teaches people meditation and how to achieve higher awareness. I talked to him, of course, about what he does. It seems he helps people access their Higher Self. He's translated many works from Sanskrit and developed a system he calls "brain software," if you translate it literally into Russian.
This topic interests him greatly; he has developed his own system and actively works with people in this field. His teacher was the Indian Guru Maharishi; he studied with him for 14 years, gaining a wealth of knowledge from him, which he applies in his work.
Irina: Hello, dear friends! My name is Irina Podzorova, and I am a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations. Today, with us is a representative of the planet Burkhad, a political scientist, sociologist, and the leader of our egregor, "Cassiopeia"—Mirrah Count. His spiritual name is Archangel Gabriel.
Maria: Hines just told me what he knows about the conditions for our planet's entry into the Interstellar Union. I gave him all these points, and one of them is five years of peace on our planet. That is, there should be no military action. And Hines just told me that in 1978, he, his teacher, and other students were able to establish a state of peace for a whole month when there was no active military action on our planet. That is, they and their group traveled the world and meditated. Their groups meditated in such a way that for the first time in 200 years, or even, I think, more, there was no military action on our planet.
Hines was inspired by the idea of establishing peace on our planet for at least five years, and he believes this can be achieved through meditation groups, if people actively meditate around the world. He believes it's possible.
05:15 Mirrah Count on the causes of wars.
Maria: And a question for Mirrah Count. How effective does he think this is, and is it possible to stop military action within five years with the help of such meditation groups?
Irina (Mirrah Count): This is, in fact, a very important question, but I could simply answer it and leave it at that. But I want Hines to answer his own question, so that everyone watching this video can understand the causes of war. To that end, I'll ask our esteemed interlocutor one question.
Tell me, please, what do you think is the cause of wars on planet Earth? What is the cause of any war in general?
Maria: Hines is convinced that wars are caused by stress and tension within each individual, within each person. And, as a result, tensions within society, which then ultimately manifest themselves in wars.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What causes stress and tension?
Maria: He says the root cause is poor upbringing.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What's wrong with it?
Hines: The reason is that connecting with your Higher Self is not part of education.
Irina: Okay, great! Mirrah Count thanks him for his answer.
And I want to ask: “Mirrah Count, who is holding the conference with whom?”
He says that he is spending time with us: “But I want us to have not even a conference, but a live conversation.”
Maria: Dialogue, right?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, a lively dialogue.
Maria: Hines is very happy that people ask him questions.
07:51 Mirrah Count on the root cause of all wars.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, indeed, you named the deep reason for all wars - this is the lack of connection with the Higher Self in each representative of the people, or a weak connection with the Higher Self.
And did the connection with the Higher Self weaken because of the Higher Self’s unwillingness to communicate or because of the person’s unwillingness to communicate with it?
Maria: Hines says: “Mirrah Count, you know the answer to this question yourself, it’s obvious – of course, people don’t maintain this contact.”
Irina (Mirrah Count): And now we come to the following conclusion: wars occur because of people's negative desires. And what is desire? Desire is a conscious need. Does the need to fight appear on the list of needs of an intelligent, immortal Spirit incarnate in a human body?
Maria: Hines says that 5,000 years ago Krishna believed that sometimes it was necessary to wage war.
Irina (Mirrah Count): We have physical, instinctual, and spiritual needs. And what kind of need is this? I can list them: physical needs are those without which the physical body cannot exist; instinctual needs are those dictated by instinctual programs; spiritual needs are those needs that the Spirit brought with it into this incarnation.
Maria: Hines says that Krishna, 5,000 years ago, asserted that war must occur precisely so that those who desire war would leave the earthly plane, that is, to remove them from incarnation. So these aren't instinctive or physiological needs, but so that peace could be restored, so to speak.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, indeed, this does happen, but we're now talking about the reasons behind even these people who were brought out of incarnation. Why did they want war?
Maria: Fears. Hines says that those who wanted to wage war against Krishna were in a state of fear, stress, and tension. That is, their state of mind was…
Irina (Mirrah Count): What were they afraid of?
Maria (Hines): These people, accordingly, had a bad upbringing, they were afraid, and they naturally wanted to seize all the power and negatively control others. In other words, it was a matter of seizing power.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And if you stand in the place of this soldier, this warrior, who stood on the other side, so to speak, of the battlefield from Krishna, did he perceive the army of Krishna and Arjuna as those who bring good?
Maria: No.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So. And since Krishna's warrior and the warrior who was against Krishna perceived each other as enemies, not friends, does that mean their perceptions were the same?
Maria: Hines says that from what he understood, Krishna did not perceive them as enemies.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Not Krishna, but the warrior who stood there, it wasn’t just Krishna who was there, there were also ordinary warriors.
Maria: Hines agrees that the other warriors who fought on Krishna's side were naturally not in high vibrations, and he says that with this war the dark time of Kali Yuga began on our planet.
Irina: Now Mirrah Count asks about the perception of two warriors, two men.
(Mirrah Count) Let's imagine these are two young men, who already have their own desires, needs, feelings, emotions—all those human qualities—and they're standing opposite each other on a battlefield, holding weapons. Can they really believe that they're the ones hindering each other's lives?
Maria: Hines agrees that these two men naturally have no personal grudges against each other, but their leaders see each other as the cause of evil, and each believes the other must be eliminated. But the soldiers themselves, the warriors themselves, do not.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Then the question is quite simple. If this is what the leaders think, why don't all the warriors turn around and go home, mind their own business, leaving the leaders to sort things out in private.
Maria: Hines says that when they performed their meditations around the world, that's exactly what happened. That is, somehow the intermediaries and the warriors themselves decided to cease hostilities, turn around, and leave. That is, their meditations had this effect.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Okay, so why doesn't this effect occur without meditation? What prevents these warriors from realizing that they're killing others and risking their lives not because of personal animosity, but because of another person's animosity?
Maria: Hines says he's been thinking about this for years and has come to the conclusion that it's a form of mass manipulation, one might even say mass hypnosis, when it influences large groups of people. But he believes such influence can be stopped.
14:43 Mirrah Count on the essence of consciousness manipulation.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, indeed, if the word "manipulation" is translated as "action to achieve a goal," then the action in this case is with the psyche, with a person's consciousness, with their brain (with the brain not as a material body, but as a physical representation of reality, that is, with the psyche).
Indeed, I recently conveyed information to Irina about the formation of a war egregor. Explain to Hines that it's an artificially created being in the Astral Plane, composed of people's emotions, desires, and thoughts.
Maria: That's exactly how I explained it to him. They have that concept too, they call it "collective consciousness."
Irina (Mirrah Count): But besides awareness, there is also the energy of feelings, etheric energy, that is, there are different sections of the egregor.
(Irina) So, Masha, Mirrah Count is now asking: “Have you read about the egregor of war?”
Maria: Of course, I read everything.
Irina: How do you like the article?
Maria: It's clear to me. Jesus and I discussed this topic two years ago.
Irina: I'm saying, how did he write about the formation of the war egregor?
Maria: Very clear. For esotericists, I think, this is a clear topic in any case.
16:26 Mirrah Count on the formation of the war egregor.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I want to say, I want to briefly reiterate now, that for a person to agree to become a warrior and go out to kill their own kind, and risk their lives, their consciousness must be influenced. This influence on consciousness can be accomplished in two ways: through instinctual programming and by creating an image of an enemy in the mind.
The first approach is through influencing instincts, primarily the instinct of self-preservation. To achieve this, the idea is created that a certain community of people threatens the existence and lives of others, threatens their property and the very existence of the state. In other words, it expresses what is known as a vital threat.
The second type of manipulation involves creating an image of an enemy in the mind, that is, in that part of the mind known as memory. To achieve this, an artificially created image of another people or part of one's own people is created in the media, as well as in all forms of political ideology, in an exclusively negative light. This means describing these people in their entirety as stupid, bloodthirsty, dangerous criminals—in other words, completely devoid of any good moral qualities.
If a person accepts this information without critically processing it, without channeling it through their spiritual heart filled with Light, this image gradually becomes ingrained in their memory. Once this image is firmly ingrained, feelings of revenge, hatred, and a desire to remake that person, or to destroy them, are artificially evoked in them in order to restore justice, including divine decrees. In other words, the person's spiritual need for justice is exploited.
Moreover, the one who creates this image of an enemy may well believe it themselves, and a person's belief determines its reality. In this case, in a person's reality, every action of the opposing side will confirm the idea that they are an enemy. This reaches such a point that a person forgets that before them is a human being like themselves—a beloved child of God—and seeks to drive them out of incarnation. And their hatred, revenge, malice, and other forms of aggression block their spiritual channel to their Higher Self.
And he no longer feels any positive emotions, no longer feels the voice of his conscience that would dissuade him from this step. And practically every soldier on both sides is convinced of the justice of this war. And if he begins to doubt, he can be eliminated, destroyed by his own comrades.
And there's another rule of war. It goes like this: the more soldiers feel defeated, the easier it is to become a traitor in that army. This is no accident, for they understand that defeat will lead to their death or capture and punishment for all their crimes. No one thinks the other side will spare them for all they've done, and so they become especially suspicious of their own comrades.
During combat, a soldier's self-preservation instincts often kick in, and he automatically acts to avoid death—killing as many enemies as possible to stay alive. Even after the war, if this soldier survives and returns home from the battlefield, his etheric field matrices are severely damaged, and he suffers psychological trauma from fear for his own life and the killing of others, which can lead to mental illness, addiction, and sociophobic behavior in society.
Well, I've explained the reasons for wars. Ask Hines if he agrees?
Maria: He would like to return to his original question.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Does he perhaps have anything to add? Because without identifying the causes of wars and reaching full agreement between both sides, it's impossible to talk about eliminating them. So ask him if he has anything to add to what I've said?
Maria: His teacher Maharishi explained the reasons for wars to him in much the same way.
Irina: Interesting. Is he also a contactee?
Maria: Yes, I think he's a contactee. He understands the causes of wars in much the same way.
Hines asks Mirrah Count if he believes we can achieve five years of peace on our planet?
22:48 Mirrah Count on actions to end the war.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Based on what I have already explained, the following problem arises: what needs to be done to prevent people from developing the desire to fight?
First, each person must constantly communicate with their Higher Self, and then they will not fall under the influence of the war egregor. Second, this involves influencing the noosphere, cleansing it and its egregorial structure of all negative energies, and weakening the war egregor by creating opposing images.
Maharishi might have used the term "spiritual psychosphere." Every thought, every feeling, every emotion enters the noosphere. And to the initial question about this meditation—whether it's possible to stop wars for five years by participating in their meditations—I'll say this.
These meditations can help stop wars. But beyond that, each person's willpower is needed. So, meditations are just that—help. But beyond that, each person's willpower is needed—their own desire to rid themselves of negativity, purify their hearts, and live in peace.
24:27 Mirrah Count on the influence and role of meditation and prayer.
Maria: So, meditation alone won’t be able to influence people, their consciousness?
Irina (Mirrah Count): If most of the Earth meditated, of course it would work. But, as I understand it, the majority is out of the question. Even being near Christ and living with him didn't prevent one of his apostles, who had received initiation, from passing it on to Roman soldiers for money. Therefore, simply being near a holy person or in a holy atmosphere without working on oneself is ineffective for spiritual growth.
Jesus Christ said, "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God." Seeing God in the world and in another person—a God who cannot be killed—is possible only for those who see God in their own hearts, and to do so, they must purify their hearts. This is the spiritual work of each person. For a person to appreciate the value of another person's life, they must see them not just as a person, but as the embodiment of God. And for a person to see God in another, they must first see God in their own hearts. This refers to the spiritual heart. And to see God in one's own heart, one must purify it. This is the spiritual work of each person on themselves.
Meditation purifies the Earth's noosphere and weakens the influence of negative egregors. It helps people free themselves from the shackles of negative entities and open a channel for communication with their Higher Self. Prayers for peace have a similar effect. Because when a person prays to God for peace, they imagine images of this world and desire for this peace to manifest on Earth.
Those who strive for peace feel like God's beloved child, for Jesus Christ said, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons of God." What does this mean? Those who strive for peace will always feel an integral part of God. This is a great help on the path of spiritual growth.
Yes, you can certainly conduct these meditations. But you must understand that there are other people on planet Earth who emit, radiate, completely different images into the noosphere.
Maria: So he's saying the ratio is uneven, right? There are fewer people meditating than those in the negative?
Irina (Mirrah Count): You can count, for example, how many soldiers there are in a single warring army. And then you can count how many relatives these soldiers have who await their return with negativity and who hate their enemies. And to these people we must also add those who have already lost their sons, husbands, and brothers in the war and will never see them again in the physical world. How high do you think their vibrations are if they are unaware of the immortal existence of the Spirit?
Therefore, since the Earth is a negativity-emitting point when wars are raging, I recommend engaging not only in meditation and prayer, but also in helping people connect with their Higher Self, removing blockages and necrotic attachments, and their spiritual enlightenment. In other words, discovering the true picture of the universe.
Maria: Thank you so much for your recommendations! So, can I just say that meditation alone won't be effective without spiritual growth and work?
Irina (Mirrah Count): They will cleanse the noosphere, but if there are more people polluting it again, something in the middle will happen. That's why your meditations were effective for, say, a month, and not five years. For them to be effective for five years, greater awareness from the majority of humanity on Earth is needed.
Do you have any other questions?
Maria: I asked Hines what he thought. He said they have experience, they have results, for example, when one percent of the population meditated, and thus they reduced crime in some settlements, in some cities.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Now let's count one percent of the Earth's population. How many people would it take to significantly reduce the amount of aggressive energy?
Maria: I just told him that I can imagine that such a large number of people don't necessarily need to gather in one place, on a field or stadium. It would be enough if the number of meditating and mindful people around the planet increased in specific locations.
Irina: Yes, you should say that we at Cassiopeia also conducted a meditation for peace on Earth.
Maria: I just told him that in our Project, we strive to make this knowledge and meditations available to as many people as possible, either free of charge or on a heart-based basis. So that as many people as possible can receive this knowledge and meditate with us.
31:06 Mirrah Count on the effectiveness of group and individual meditations.
Maria: So, this is the question for Mirrah Count: how much more effective is the meditation of people who have gathered together, for example, 100 people in one room, or thousands of people who are in different places?
Irina (Mirrah Count speaking): It all depends on their engagement in the process. You can gather a hundred people together in one room physically, but mentally they won't be connected, they'll be thinking about different things. Or you can gather far away from each other physically, but think about the same things and create a unified spiritual space.
Maria: Hines confirms that when they do online meditations together, the effect is as strong as if they were all in the same room, meaning distance doesn't matter.
Irina: Okay. Any other questions? Let him ask.
32:05 Mirrah Count on meditation in countering aggression.
Maria: He would still like an answer to his first, original question. Was it a coincidence that when six different groups near military operations around the world conducted meditations, for a month these wars, these military operations, ceased?
Irina (Mirrah Count): This wasn't an accident. It was a consequence of them clearing the space where they were—around those military bases. They cleared the negative space, and the people there began to doubt the justice of this war.
Maria: Hines asks if they will be able to assemble such groups across the planet and thus help to quickly stop military actions where they are occurring?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Whether he'll be able to collect them depends on many factors. Everyone has free will—everyone. But if he collects them, it will contribute to the purification of the noosphere.
Maria: I just relayed Mirrah Count's answer to him. And as far as I understand, it will help stop the wars for a while, but as soon as these groups disperse again, everything will return to its original state. And he himself said that those involved in these military actions tried to interfere. That is, they didn't want people to meditate and wanted to stop them, which confirms Mirrah Count's words.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Because the negative entities provoked them so as not to lose energetic food in the form of negative energies. This is not surprising, since it is not the subtle entities who are risking their lives, but people. What do they have to worry about? They are simply eating and enjoying themselves.
34:37 Mirrah Count on the most effective way to resist wars.
Irina (Mirrah Count): The greatest effect will come from confronting the egregor of war not only through meditation but also by explaining to people the tricks of those who create the image of the enemy, so they don't fall for them. And it's very good to remind everyone that all people are one, all have a common destiny, that is, they are all from the same planet. You are all from the same planet, and you are bound by a common destiny. And it's very good to remind people that all of them, regardless of nationality, are God's beloved children.
Maria: Hines asks again whether Mirrah Count believes that the dissemination of spiritual knowledge and its inclusion in the educational process has a greater effect than meditation?
Irina (Mirrah Count): It depends on the purpose. Working with a person's Higher Self is crucial for eliminating wars. Teach them to communicate with their Higher Self, and then they won't be drawn into destructive processes on the planet. In other words, give a person a tool for communicating with the God within them, and they will make everything around them Divine. If you see an evil person, it doesn't mean they're guilty; it means their Soul is sick, their Soul is sick with malice, and they need help to heal.
36:23 Mirrah Count on the general benefits of meditation. Conclusion.
Maria: Mirrah Count, in principle, meditation, when people learn meditation, is also a kind of tool that helps in connecting with the Higher Self.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, it is very useful to meditate, and also to teach it to others.
Maria: That's exactly what Hines does in his project—teaching people meditation and connecting with the Higher Self. He just calls it the "all-knowing Higher Self." That's his term, but it's essentially the same thing.
In conclusion, Hines expresses his gratitude. He says everything was very clear and interesting, and he believes we haven't lost hope. We will continue working toward achieving five years without war on our planet.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I also thank and thank Hines, and send him the Light of my Love.
It's also important to remember that any war is a manifestation of negative energies accumulated in the noosphere on the physical plane. To prevent wars, the Earth's noosphere must always be pure. Become a happy and loving person and show others your example of happiness and Love, so that they can become like them and pass on this Light. And then the entire Earth will shine with the Divine Fire of Love, like a star in the Spiritual Sky.
Maria: Irochka, I thank you!
Irina: Mirrah Count now feels our energy in the common space and speaks.
(Mirrah Count) There are now three of you, Souls, and you shine so brightly that you are visible from the astral space of Mars' orbit, that is, in space. And this serves as proof of the words that no distance can separate loving hearts.
Maria: And we want to strengthen this, we are going to strengthen this.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Okay, thank you for the conference!
(Irina) Dear friends, I'd like to say something else on my own behalf. I thank Masha, I thank Hines, and I thank Mirrah Count for a fascinating conference! I thank you for the questions and answers. And I thank Mirrah Count, too, for the engaging questions and answers.
Indeed, as the saying goes, everything is in our hands. The main thing is for each person to realize that responsibility is not a restriction of freedom, but rather its manifestation.
Maria: Mirrah Count, thank you! Thank you, Irochka and Hines, for this wonderful conference, and I think we'll have many more interesting topics to discuss. Thank you from the bottom of my heart!
Hines: Thank you! Thank you, Mirrah Count! Thank you, Irina! Thank you, Maria!
Irina: Thank you all!
Maria: Thank you! Thank you!
April 27, 2023
Conference participants:
Irina Podzorova is a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, with subtle-material civilizations and with the Spiritual world;
Maria Sokalskaya is a co-founder of the Cassiopeia Project, head of the SAKRAL online school, and an administrator and moderator of social networks and video conferences;
Heins Krug – specialist in meditation practices, Germany;
Mirrah Count (Archangel Gabriel) is a representative of the planet Burkhad, the keeper of the Christian egregor.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/problemy-religioznyh-ehgregorov-mira-mirrah-kaunt
Cassiopeia #749: The Problems of the World's Religious Egregors. Mirrah Count and Irina Podzorova (Project Cassiopeia) live.
00:00 Broadcast starts.
00:03 Greetings from Irina. Introduction of the guest.
Irina: Hello, dear friends! Good afternoon everyone, greetings! My name is Irina Podzorova, and I am a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, with the Spiritual World, and with subtle-material civilizations. Today, with us is a representative of the planet Burkhad. His name is Mirrah Count, and he is the spiritual leader of the Cassiopeia project egregor.
Yes, he also greets you, sends the Light of his Love and says that he will be happy to answer your questions on the topic of religious egregors.
Maxim: Guys, you can ask your questions. We have a live broadcast Q&A chat called "Live Broadcast." I'll be waiting for your questions in this Telegram chat.
00:57 The idea of the Interstellar Union to create the Cassiopeia Project.
Maxim: And now I would like to talk to Mirrah Count.
Mirah Count, please tell me, you are the curator of our Cassiopeia Project.
Irina (Mirrach Count): Yes.
Maxim: And what is the overall idea of the Interstellar Union contained in our Project? What does the Interstellar Union want from our Project?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Disseminating information about the Interstellar Union to the general public: its laws, its worlds, its planets, its existence, as well as raising awareness and the level of love among earthlings through the spiritual practices of the Cassiopeia Project. This is one of many spiritual projects initiated by the Interstellar Union to prepare humanity for mass contact with extraterrestrial civilizations.
Maxim: I see.
02:08 Reasons for the negative attitude of the authorities and religion towards contactees.
Maxim: Tell me, please, why are our government structures, our institutions, our religious egregors so negatively disposed towards contactees and the transmission of the information they carry?
Irina: Why? Who's in the mood, again?
Maxim: Our government agencies. That is, various government agencies, religious structures, and law enforcement agencies. Why are they so negative?
Irina: What do you call negativity?
Maxim: Negative? Well, they say it's a lie, a deception, that it doesn't exist, that it violates some concept of the state, some state policy.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It's not a negative statement; it's simply their opinion, expressed as people with a materialistic attitude toward something they can't understand. For them, these are certain illusions that people believe in, like religion. Many in positions of power have the same attitude toward major religions. But that's their personal attitude.
Regarding legislation. In the legislation, if we're talking specifically about the Russian Federation, certain occult and esoteric practices are simply neutrally labeled as safe for people and not harmful to their health, property, or lives. And what people in power say—"We don't believe this because it's a lie and a deception"—is their understanding of contactees. Why do they have this particular understanding? Because they're materialists; they don't have any contacts themselves. They speak based solely on their own experience. Those in power, and there are some there, who have personal experience of contact, naturally don't say this.
Maxim: And why is it that...
04:26 Mirrah Count's supervision of earthly projects.
Maxim: How old are you now?
Irina (Mirrah Count): At this moment in time I am 6026 Earth years old.
Maxim: What other projects did you oversee on Earth?
Irina (Mirrah Count): I partially supervised the egregor of Judaism together with Yahweh, and I supervised and still supervise the egregor of Christianity.
Maxim: I understand.
04:54 Why doesn't Christianity accept aliens?
Maxim: Why is Christianity so ambivalent about extraterrestrial civilizations and various kinds of information that contradict the canons adopted at the Council?
Irina (Mirrah Count): You've answered the question yourself. Because the information being transmitted now contradicts church canons.
How were these canons received, and in what eras were they accepted? At that time, for reasons we've already conveyed, certain beliefs were beneficial for human development. This applies, for example, to reincarnation and so on. As for modern transmission, humanity is now ready to discover information that was previously unavailable.
Religious egregors, including Christianity, have a protective function against ideas that contradict the egregor's own, for the reasons I mentioned earlier. Accordingly, their reaction is a defensive one, designed to prevent the egregor from splitting. If we're talking about Christianity, then within Christian disputes, disagreements, and disillusionment with faith, there are certain defense mechanisms that protect the egregor from new information received through contactees. But this is not surprising, because...
(Irina) Yes, okay, I understand.
06:48 An example of resistance to the new from the egregor of Judaism.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I'll give you an example now.
I've already mentioned the egregor of Judaism. You know very well that it was formed by Yahweh, who, accordingly, then incarnated as Jesus Christ. Thus, Jesus Christ is the very Spirit who was Yahweh, who shaped all of Judaism, and who is considered God in Judaism. When He came in a new body, the very representatives of this egregor He created didn't recognize Him. Not only did they not believe that He was Yahweh, but they also considered the representative of their own egregor, whom they considered God, a fraud, a charlatan, who was going against the authorities. And for performing miracles, they also considered Him a magician, a sorcerer, connected to evil spirits, to demonic forces.
All this combined led to representatives of the very egregor He had created asking the authorities to physically eliminate Him by crucifying Him. The egregor refused... After all, the egregor of Judaism had already been formed during the time of Christ's existence. So, the egregor of Judaism refused to accept its founder, who began to express different ideas.
08:30 Modern resistance to contact.
Irina (Mirrah Count): The laws are somewhat different now. Humanity's social and moral norms are no longer the same as they were two thousand years ago, but more gentle, loving, and kind, because back then, everything was harsh. Now, the egregor resists new information in a different way. For example, with criticism, with its insistence on not trusting contactees because they communicate with unclean spirits and demons, and with various examples of negative contacts.
There are even such books. For example, if we take the Christian church, there are books in the Christian church where special priests-researchers talk to people, read books, and so on, that is, they collect information specifically about a person's negative contacts with someone, including contacts with aliens. There are such books. And all this is collected and written down, stating that this particular person had contacts with aliens, with Spirits, and this led to negative consequences, for example, insanity, depression, suicide, or crime. And on this basis, the conclusion is drawn that all contacts with aliens, with Spirits, are contacts with demons, who accordingly pursue their goal – to distract a person from faith and lead them to destruction.
They don't do this intentionally to directly destroy faith in contactees; it's simply their belief, which they project through their minds, as they have the concept that true information resides only in one structure—the religious organization to which they adhere. Therefore, they consider all others false, including contactee egregors. Accordingly, they strive—it's their self-imposed duty—to protect people from the false influence of contactees. In other words, it's simply a discussion based on their understanding of the truth.
(Irina) Well, what do you think of the answer?
Maxim: Yes, very interesting.
11:13 How long does it take for religious egregors to form?
Maxim: How then can our egregor fit harmoniously into our state egregor, our state religious egregor? We are a multireligious country, where Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and Buddhism are accepted. But these religions exist at the legislative level, meaning they are all approved by the states in which they are practiced.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, they are large. They've already passed their formative stage, as they've existed for thousands of years. All the religions you listed began as small sects, which were even persecuted by local authorities in their time. Over thousands of years, these sects have grown into large religious egregors.
Maxim: I see. So we just...
Irina (Mirrah Count): That's besides Buddhism. Buddhism began as a small sect, but wasn't particularly persecuted by the authorities, just like Judaism, but there was a different problem. It wasn't persecuted by the authorities there, but there were certain difficulties during its formation, related to wars, the Jewish people's enslavement to the Egyptians, and so on.
As for Islam, there was also a period of egregor formation, when it was persecuted by locals, I wouldn’t call it the authorities, but by certain power structures of those tribes where it was all preached.
Christianity also developed from a small sect, initially within Judaism. It then separated from Judaism and, consequently, began to be persecuted by both the religious authorities of Israel itself and the authorities of the Roman Empire, who saw Christianity as a threat to themselves, to the continued existence of their faith in their gods, and so on. Thus, if we're talking about Christianity, it was only nearly 400 years after its founding that this egregor emerged from the ranks of a sect and became a state religion, a large enough one to exert influence on state power.
Maxim: 400 years have passed?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, when this egregor was already recognized at the national level of that time.
Maxim: I see. But the only thing I don't understand is...
13:58 Mirrah Count on the importance of enforcing laws.
Irina (Mirrah Count): How can you coexist harmoniously with the state? By obeying all the laws!
You, as people who are part of the Cassiopeia egregor and are its founders on Earth, in order to harmoniously coexist with the state and religious egregors, it is necessary and sufficient to do several things.
First, comply with the laws, both civil and criminal, meaning not to violate them. Before deciding on any actions, if they raise questions, it's necessary to draw up all the required documents and, if necessary, consult with lawyers to ensure everything is legally sound from the perspective of the state egregor, and to ensure everything is done correctly.
That's the first thing. After all, the egregor's security depends on being loyal to the state authorities. And to be loyal to the state authorities, the authorities won't believe mere words of "loyalty" unless there's proof. And proof means following the law.
Do you understand what I'm talking about?
Maxim: Yes.
15:22 Rules for working with people. Payment is due.
Irina (Mirrah Count): The second is correct, proper, and in the Light of Love work with people in the areas of the Cassiopeia Project. Esoteric work, in this case.
What does "correct" and "competent" mean? To avoid potential accusations of fraud from people and government agencies, it's enough to adhere to the same rules for providing spiritual services as we currently do. That is, payment is not based on a fixed price, but rather on the person's own desire, the heart's desire—this immediately absolves you of any possible accusations of deception for profit.
Maxim: Yes, that's understandable, but...
16:15 On the correct transfer of information.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And thirdly, she must convey information (this applies more to Irina, of course), transmitting it correctly, without breaking the law. Accordingly, this includes information from the curators. But she communicates not only with the Interstellar Union, but also with representatives of the Spiritual World and with representatives of subtle-material civilizations, and they come at different levels. Do you understand what I'm saying?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): For example, you had live broadcasts not only with representatives of angelic levels?
Maxim: Well, yes, there were some with low vibrations.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I see such broadcasts in the future, and they're truly necessary. But Irina needs to be aware of their opinions, of course, and convey what they say, but do so using appropriate language so as not to violate the law. You understand, right? The same opinion can be expressed in different ways?
Maxim: Yes, it can be expressed in different ways.
Irina (Mirrah Count): In other words, it can be more harsh, so much so that the law is being broken, or it can be more gentle, and simply state, "This is what he thinks." It's important to carefully conduct live broadcasts and conferences specifically with Spirits who reside at the lower levels of the Spiritual World, at the demonic levels, so to speak, and who have been especially involved in political processes, especially in Russia.
(Irina) Of course, yes. He's now showing me broadcasts with some of the Spirits that we had.
Maxim: Yes, I remember those broadcasts.
Irina (Mirrah Count): That is, if they express a critical opinion about the Russian Federation, or about its current authorities, or something else, it is necessary, of course, to convey this opinion, but to do it correctly.
Irina also communicates with subtle-material civilizations and conveys their views. Subtle-material civilizations come in different forms, with different beliefs. Here, too, it's important to convey information correctly during live broadcasts and conferences with them, so that it isn't interpreted as some kind of call to action. Do you understand what I'm saying?
Maxim: Well, yes, so that there are no calls for extremism, so that there are no negative calls in relation to our state.
Irina (Mirrah Count): This rather relates to Irina herself, to her competence as a contactee and a person who should also know the laws and legislation in this area and follow them.
19:06 How the Cassiopeia Project can harmonize with the state.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So, once again about paying according to the heart and about everything being done according to the law. For every action you take, figuratively speaking, and for every object you create in Cassiopeia, there must be a document.
(Irina) He’s now showing me that there’s such a pile of papers.
(Mirrah Count) So that when authorities inspect an organization that arouses suspicion, you can explain in their language that everything is in order with you, that you are not breaking the law.
Maxim: Yes, that’s clear.
Irina (Mirrah Count): The second is payment according to the heart. The third is spiritual services. The fourth is the correct transfer of information, including with those Spirits who are on the lower level, in a state of unconsciousness and lack of love. Some people simply believe that if a Spirit has passed into the Spiritual World, they immediately become conscious and unite with God. In fact, this is not true. We have 24 levels, and each level has a different degree of awareness and level of Love. Do you understand?
Maxim: Yes.
20:21 Distortion of information by some Spirits.
Irina (Mirrah Count): That is why some people (I just know their beliefs) think that the Spirit cannot lie there, he cannot deceive there, he always tells the truth there.
Okay, so then why did Jesus call the devil, specifically Lucifer, the father of lies? He said, "The devil is the father of lies." But Lucifer wasn't incarnate at that point. He's currently on the sixth level in the Spiritual World, and he was on the sixth level back then, too. So, a lie is simply a tool used by a specific Spirit, a specific individual, to achieve their goals by distorting information they know, that is, for example, by misrepresenting one piece of information as another.
And the Spirit can do this because it has imagination—both in the body and outside the body. This can be done by the Spirit, whether embodied or disembodied. The qualities of its Spiritual Heart do not change with incarnation or disembodiment. That is, at the moment of disembodiment, the qualities of its Spiritual Heart, including its moral standards, remain the same as they were before disembodiment.
(Irina) What do you say?
Maxim: I will say that you need to change your spiritual level here while you are in this incarnation, so that there, in the Spiritual World...
22:03 Why doesn't Christianity recognize reincarnation?
Maxim: And another question. The biggest problem is that many religious egregors promulgate information about reincarnation. But why is it that our Christian religious egregors still can't accept the possibility of various reincarnations within incarnations? What do you think?
Irina (Mirrah Count): This contradicts the canons of the religious egregor that were accepted. As I already explained about reincarnation, as the Mother of God, her Spirit, explained, during the formation of the Christian Church, the Christian egregor, many books were written by the Christian Holy Fathers, and these are authoritative spiritual teachers. Do you understand what I mean?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): They wrote down certain concepts related to the existence of the soul after the death of the body, which were naturally based on their understanding of the Bible. And when they saw people preaching about reincarnation—and there were certainly such people in the Roman Empire—they listened to them and concluded that this belief was false based on certain points.
First, these people believed that human souls reincarnate into animals and insects. Christian preachers, however, denied this, since in Christianity, the souls of humans and animals are fundamentally distinct from each other. Therefore, they argued that the soul does not reincarnate, based on the teaching that it reincarnates into animals and humans.
Secondly, they based their disbelief in reincarnation on the fact that the Soul at birth does not remember past lives.
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So they wrote. There was this saint (gestures) in the 2nd century AD, he wrote: "If I had a past life, why don't I remember it? And if I don't remember it, then for me it's as if it never happened. So what's the point of me even thinking about it?"
(Irina) How do you like this conviction?
Maxim: Well, yes.
Irina: What do you say?
Maxim: I will say that religion is a very interesting thing.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And the third reason: there was a decision by the Christian Ecumenical Council that reincarnation is heresy.
24:46 Canons of the Church and heresy.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Tell me, how do you understand the word “heresy”?
Maxim: Heresy is a contradiction to the canons that were originally built into a certain structure.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So this is some kind of teaching?
Heresy is a belief or teaching that is opposed to, or contradicts, a belief already found in the canons of the Church. That is, a heretic... Some people misunderstand the word "heretic." When someone calls another a heretic, some people perceive it as being called them, as if they're spouting nonsense. So, heresy is just that—nonsense.
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): In fact, in the ecclesiastical sense, "heresy" isn't nonsense; it's simply a belief that contradicts the church's beliefs and canons. When someone is called a heretic, they're claiming they don't belong to the Christian egregor because they don't share the beliefs that are mandatory within it. The fact is, to belong to egregorial structures on Earth, you need to think in a certain way and radiate similar thoughts. Do you understand what I'm saying?
Maxim: Yes.
I see that many videos on YouTube have been closed.
Irina: What do you mean?
Maxim: I'm figuring it out now.
26:18 How reincarnation was excluded from the canons of Christianity.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So why was reincarnation considered heresy, that is, a teaching that contradicts Christianity?
These are the two reasons I mentioned. And there was a third reason. The Holy Fathers who declared "this is heresy" agreed that if they included reincarnation in the Christian teachings, it would lead (they saw this around them, in other people who believed in reincarnation) to people hoping for a future life and not working to correct their sins in this life.
Do you understand what the matter is? Haven't you heard?
Maxim: Again. I was a little distracted – reading, trying to follow the chat.
Irina : They said reincarnation should be banned. Not banned exactly, but deemed heretical on the grounds that…
(Mirrah Count): The third was the belief (or so they believed) that the Christian doctrine of reincarnation would lead people to believe they would learn their lessons in the next life, while in this life they would simply sin as they pleased. And on this basis, they retained the canon that there is only one life, and after it comes judgment, and that's all—so that a person would have one chance, not many.
Maxim: Yes, I remember that, we were just talking about this.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So, on these three grounds: that the Soul does not reincarnate into animals, that people do not remember past lives, and that the teaching about past lives can lead to a careless attitude toward one's current life. Do you understand what I mean?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It was on these three grounds that they decided to accept the exclusion of reincarnation from possible canons.
28:14 Hints in the Bible about reincarnation.
Irina (Mirrah Count): There was an opportunity to introduce this into the canon, as the Bible contains certain hints about reincarnation. They're already known. For example, there's the famous story of Jesus calling John the Baptist the prophet Elijah. Do you remember that moment?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Now that's one hint.
The second hint is when the disciples asked Jesus, "Why is this man blind from birth?" That is, they asked him, "This man has been blind since birth. Why is he blind? Did he sin or did his parents?" In other words, "How could he have sinned if he was blind from birth? Where could he have sinned?"
Maxim: Where could he have sinned? In a past life.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And this episode was left in the Gospel. Please – the ninth chapter of the Gospel of Matthew, verse one. You can look it up. [The Gospel of John, Chapter 9, verses 1-3].
Maxim: Very interesting.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And there are actually several such hints there. So reincarnation could very well have been introduced into the canon, and if it had been, it would have been a different religion. It would have structured itself differently, including its liturgical texts, its rites, rituals, and so on. But Christianity itself wouldn't have been destroyed by this, although it would undoubtedly have been different.
Maxim: I understand.
29:52 Attitudes towards contactees in Buddhism and Islam.
Maxim: And how do they treat contactees in Buddhism?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Neutral. It's a personal matter. So, there are no such restrictions.
Maxim: In Islam?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Cautiously. But less cautiously than in Christianity, thanks to Apshetarim [aka Archangel Gabriel]. Because this alien from the planet Tumesout, who created the Islamic egregor and provided the information for its creation to the Prophet Muhammad, introduced certain things into the teaching, that is, into the Quran, that are not found in Christianity. For example, the idea of multiple worlds. The Quran repeatedly mentions that Allah is the Lord of the worlds. How do you understand this?
Maxim: So, this is the One God for all worlds.
Irina (Mirrah Count): The Bible, for example, makes no such statements. There was no need to talk about worlds there. But Apshetarim told the Prophet Muhammad that there are many worlds, and he included this in the Quran.
And the second is the teaching about the jinn, that is, beings of a different nature than the incorporeal angels and humans. These beings, as described there, are fiery in nature. They didn't simply have the words "ether" or "plasma" in their vocabulary.
Maxim: Well, yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Therefore, they wrote that jinn are fiery creatures, essentially acknowledging the existence of nature spirits, plasmoids. But unlike Christianity, they indicated that these creatures could be either following God's path or departing from Him, meaning both good and evil.
That's why contactees in Islam are viewed with caution, because... You understand that when a new contactee appears in an egregor, the egregor's leaders, who will become familiar with their contact, don't yet know who they're contacting, so to speak. After all, contactees come in all shapes and sizes.
Maxim: Well, yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Indeed, it's possible that, under the guise of beings of light, a person will contact entities attracted by their vibrations if they have various blocks there. Neither the leaders of the Christian egregor nor the leaders of the Islamic egregor know the state of a new contactee's Heart when they appear, so they can't say for sure who they're contacting. Therefore, they can only rely on their information. And they will accept information as long as it doesn't contradict their own views, which they have formed within this egregor. If the information coming from the contactee contradicts the canons of Islam, they will treat it in the same way that Christians generally treat contactees—that is, they will accept that it could be, so to speak, from evil jinn.
Maxim: Well, that's right, from evil Spirits.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, or from evil spirits. And if there's no contradiction, they won't recognize it. They'll say it's really Allah or His messengers talking to this person. Then, in Islam, it's simply considered an ability that not everyone has.
33:39 Attitude towards contactees in the Torah.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Christianity's attitude toward contactees is even stricter, and this must be addressed. Because some commandments from the Jewish Torah were adopted by Christianity as its own.
Maxim: Which ones exactly?
Irina (Mirrah Count): The thing is, in the Torah, in the 18th chapter of Deuteronomy, there was a ban on certain esoteric practices. For example, on certain types of magic listed there, on fortune-telling, and on summoning Spirits. This ban was introduced into the Torah by Yahweh, naturally, in order to form a Jewish egregor. And the contactees who were there, who contacted Spirits, various entities, and so on, would have carried ideas that would have destroyed this egregor and prevented Jesus from incarnating. Do you understand what I mean?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): That is why He imposed a ban on communication and esoteric practices associated with plasmoid civilizations, with the Spiritual world, so that people would direct their thoughts and feelings only to Yahweh, so that He would incarnate.
34:56 Should we trust information from subtle-material civilizations?
Maxim: Well, yes. Because subtle-material civilizations can present information differently.
Irina: Yes, of course.
Maxim: The spiritual world can also present information in its own way.
Irina: Yes, there are many different Spirits there.
Maxim: Different perceptions of reality, different justifications for that reality. But I see it this way: regardless, when you have a great deal of knowledge and awareness, you can translate this information from one to another, justifying it and why it's stated that way.
35:24 People become contactees regardless of any prohibitions.
Irina (Mirrah Count): This wasn't, of course, an obstacle to contacts. Because someone who was in the Jewish egregor and began to become a contactee, receiving some information, even while facing this commandment against making contact, could, if they understood who they were contacting and accepted that contact, simply not tell people about it, and use the information given to them for their own purposes. And that's all.
Maxim: I agree.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So, it wasn't necessary to announce it. And I'll say that even now, even though it's the 21st century, there are contactees who receive information from the Spiritual World, the subtle worlds, and extraterrestrial civilizations simply for themselves, and they don't advertise it in any way. They work at their jobs, and even, for example, are well-known members of society. But even though they receive this information and even know they're contactees, they don't advertise it in any way. It's simply their personal contact. There are many such people, by the way.
36:33 Transfer of information by contactees according to the task of incarnation.
Maxim: And when will the time come on Earth when all contactees will stop being afraid of being contactees, receiving information, making contact, and trying to transmit this information to people?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Each person has their own task. This also depends on their goals. Because if a person is a contactee, the purpose of the contact can also vary. Contactees don't have a single goal, for example, to transmit information to someone. Sometimes the purpose of contact is simply personal contact for their own individual purposes, without transmitting information to others. Moreover, not everyone has contacteeship as a goal of embodiment.
So, what is the purpose of incarnation? The soul comes into this incarnation with a specific purpose. And if it has come specifically to convey information from its curators, then it enters into a spiritual contract (agreement) with these curators, according to which it will transmit the information. And then, when contact begins...
For example, if we take Irina, this happened to her, if we're talking about extraterrestrial civilizations, at the age of thirteen. Naturally, all of this was part of her incarnation's purpose. Accordingly, she could have hidden this information, not shared it with anyone, and personally contacted representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations. But she had thoughts about revealing this information first to her mother, and then to everyone else. These thoughts didn't just come out of nowhere, did they? They were specific thoughts from her Higher Self, because this was the fulfillment of the purpose of her incarnation.
Maxim: Yes, I too, when I started receiving information from you, I realized that this was the purpose of my incarnation.
Irina (Mirrach Count): Yes, of course.
Maxim: And when I met my Higher Self, when I met representatives of an extraterrestrial civilization, the Spiritual World, and subtle-material structures, I assembled in my head a whole puzzle of information that I could never answer.
38:59 Recommendations from Mirrah Count on structuring information.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I can give you some more recommendations. Yes, it's good that videos and articles are being released, and it's also very good that books are being written in the Cassiopeia egregor, because it all structures the information and allows... And it's good that there are these tables that structure the information that was previously given.
(Irina) Dictionaries and tables. Now she's showing what our volunteers are working on.
(Mirrah Count) Structuring information, its release in the form of some kind of manuals in paper or electronic form is also very important for educating the people with the knowledge that the egregor of "Cassiopeia" carries.
Maxim: Yes, of course, our egregor would like to structure itself with other egregorial structures. Of course, a huge number of people are frightened by this information; they're afraid of aliens, don't believe in them, and think we communicate with demons. And in general, our attitude toward contactees with extraterrestrial civilizations is very inappropriate, or rather, not entirely appropriate.
Irina (Mirrah Count): This attitude was formed based on their stereotypes, including their communication. People communicated with other contactees, with esotericists. And you know, this communication wasn't always based on Love. Do you understand what I'm saying?
Maxim: Well, yes. Because we had different contactees in the Project, with different mindsets. In general, the Cassiopeia Project was initially conceived to eliminate lies, falsehood, the opportunity to profit from people by setting prices for spiritual knowledge, and the opportunity to deceive people.
Therefore, the Cassiopeia Project itself (I speak as its director) was initially built and continues to be built on very interesting ideas – the ideas of awareness, perception, and Love. Yes, of course, people support us. Yes, of course, they send us donations. And for this, we are incredibly grateful! For allowing the Cassiopeia Project to exist, for the Cassiopeia Project to develop, for the Cassiopeia Project to be built.
41:23 Harmonization of the Cassiopeia Project with state egregors.
Irina (Mirrah Count): If you, as the founders of the Project, desire greater harmonization with egregors, both state and religious, then you need to position yourself there. For example, (gestures) by participating in broadcasts, in preparing media articles, and so on about your Project.
Do you understand what I'm talking about? This is an attempt to integrate your egregor into the national arena. How is it happening? Naturally, from the perspective that the majority of people in society are materialistically minded. That's why the integration is taking place in this form.
42:06 Integration with religious egregors.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Regarding integration with religious egregors and the egregors of other esoteric projects, to establish yourself there, if that's what you want, you don't need to wait for them to come to you. You need to go there and talk to them on their platforms. Because they won't come to you; they have their own egregors. If you have a request, go there and talk to them there.
For example, Irina's conversations (demonstrates) in the Christian chat were an attempt at such a conversation on their platform. Wasn't that already their platform, their Christian egregor? And she went there and started talking about herself and the Cassiopeia Project. And then their reaction was whatever it was; everyone reacted differently, of course. But the fact remains that she shared some things that they simply couldn't have known about, being in a Christian egregor and a Christian chat. They don't go to esoteric channels to watch your videos.
Maxim: But is it necessary to do this? Because it turns out we're entering the territory of a Christian religious egregore. And within this territory, so to speak, there are believers who support this egregore. Aren't we harming the egregore by doing this?
Irina: Which one?
Maxim: Christian.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Why are you causing harm?
(Irina) Yes, okay. Yes, I remember. He's just showing me certain points now.
(Mirrah Count) The thing is... Let me explain.
The chat itself, naturally, was created by Christians. But it already included representatives of various beliefs, not just Irina. For example, there were certain people there who were completely atheists, and people from the Jewish egregor. There were people from Protestant movements (for example, Jehovah's Witnesses), that is, from certain organizations that are not part of the Christian egregor. After all, the Christian egregor has various denominations, and they also argue among themselves. Do you understand what I mean?
Maxim: Well, yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And in this chat, there were representatives of various Christian denominations. These people argued among themselves, and even more heatedly than with Irina. Because Irina is an esotericist, the questions for her were different. And they had more pressing questions for each other.
Therefore, certain people from different egregors were already mixed together in this chat. And if we're talking about danger, that's the fault of the chat's founders. They themselves gathered them there and allowed them to communicate. So, they didn't consider it dangerous. But the interactions there were quite intense, for example, people, as I've already mentioned, with certain atheistic beliefs, who completely deny the existence of God and all his prophets, and so on.
The information itself, whatever it may be, poses no danger. Information is simply information. Each person decides for themselves how to respond to it. The point is that Irina had a specific request to speak with these people, those not involved in the Cassiopeia Project, and to explain her contact and her concepts to them in an appropriate manner.
I'm simply saying that if you have a desire to harmonize with other egregors, then before harmonizing with them, you first need to become famous. You'll only become famous if you go there en masse. Otherwise, you won't be recognized.
Maxim: Over the course of five years, we have gained considerable mass recognition and become one of the largest esoteric projects in Russia.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, but that's among esotericists. I'm talking about mass egregors now.
46:54 How to spread information about the Cassiopeia Project?
Maxim: Well, yes. To move into mass egregors, we'll need to navigate various governmental upheavals.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So, it all depends on your needs. If you want to go further, gradually expanding public awareness of new knowledge, you'll simply provide information and explain it to people on your channels, in your chats, on your social media, and so on. But if you want to quickly gain recognition, then you or your volunteers will...
(Irina) He's showing me right now that this is already happening: our volunteers are joining various chats or YouTube channels that aren't affiliated with us and starting to talk about us. And, by the way, people are coming from there too.
Maxim: Well, yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So you're already doing this. Irina isn't the only one doing this. And the volunteers, they even go to places where you're unknown and spread the word about the Project. But again, it's important to understand that this isn't being done to attract or lure anyone in. They can't do that; they can only suggest things, provide information. And then the people there will decide for themselves whether they're interested. Do you understand what I'm saying?
Maxim: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So, here, everything depends on your needs. If you want to move forward on your own and develop as you are, you will do so. If you desire discussion, that is, relationships with other egregors, you will go there. But you must understand that the relationship between religious egregors and the egregor that carries esotericism will, at this stage of development, in any case, only take the form of a discussion. Let it be a public discussion, let it be a gentle discussion, but it will still be a discussion. It's important to understand that representatives of the religious egregor will not agree with all the ideas you discuss. It will be a specific discussion.
Maxim: Yes, of course. Because to maintain an egregor that's been built over thousands of years, I think it's necessary to have a very good, correct, and educated discussion. Who would appreciate it if someone more accurately explained things that egregors interpret differently?
Irina (Mirrah Count): But they won't consider it any more correct. That is, they will consider it, as I already said, heresy, because it contradicts Christian canons in certain details.
49:52 How does Cassiopeia contradict Christian canons?
Irina (Mirrah Count): I'll now explain which Christian canons the information in Cassiopeia contradicts. It's very simple.
First, as I've already said, is the existence of reincarnation. This will be the very first thing you'll discuss with the Christian egregor. If you go there, for example, to their chats, websites, or make any official appeals, then the first thing you'll discuss is reincarnation.
The second is the general existence of extraterrestrial civilizations. Although the very existence of extraterrestrial civilizations within the Christian egregor itself is a matter of debate. The Bible, in both the Old and New Testaments, naturally doesn't contain the word "aliens," due to the absence of such a term in the ancient languages in which these texts were written. But there's also no denial of the existence of extraterrestrial life.
That is, there is a specific description of objects, beings that appeared to people, but they are called "angels," they are called "God Yahweh," that is, specific individuals. And in the New Testament there is also a description, for example, of the Ascension of Christ, which took place before the eyes of the disciples. And that disciple, the Apostle Luke, who wrote the book "Acts of the Holy Apostles," described how he saw, as the disciples saw, that Jesus Christ rose up and a cloud received Him. ["He was lifted up before their very eyes, and a cloud received Him out of their sight" Chapter 1 of Acts, 9]. That is, He did not simply dissolve into thin air, or turn into a small dot, but that a cloud took Him up. That is how he saw this cloud, and that is how he described it.
How do you understand this? What was it?
Maxim: No, well, I understand what it was. But those who read about the cloud simply don't want to understand it.
52:13 The concept of “Christ is risen” in Christianity.
Maxim: And even when I ask what the expression "Christ is risen" means, no one can really explain it to me. They tell me that He was resurrected in a spiritual body, that He was resurrected in some other way.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, there are such ideas. The thing is, Christianity holds that the body in which He was resurrected was physical, but at the same time possessed special properties. That is, after His resurrection, His physical matter possessed special properties (this is easier to put in esoteric terms), which could instantly transform into a spiritual form.
Maxim: That is, a spiritual body that has physical material properties?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes. So, indeed, since Jesus's physical body wasn't found in the cave, Christians naturally believe that this physical body isn't there, that it was resurrected. But having been resurrected, it acquired special spiritual properties (according to Christian belief) that it didn't have. That is, the body remained physical, because Jesus later ate the fish and honey offered by the disciples. He ate it physically; it wasn't some spirit without flesh, but the flesh itself acquired the properties of eternity and the ability to dwell in the Spiritual World. This is what Christians believe.
That's why they have this concept that Christ, even in a physical body, in this new, renewed physical body, is with the Father in the Spiritual World. And when your esotericists ask, "How does a physical body exist in the Spiritual World?" they simply answer, in their own way, according to their own beliefs, that "it's a new physical body that can exist there." Do you understand what I mean?
Maxim: Yes.
54:24 What “cloud” in the Bible “took” Jesus Christ?
Irina (Mirrah Count): But let's still turn to the Bible text. It says, "Christ arose, and a cloud received Him out of their sight." It says something about a cloud. What is it?
Maxim: According to the ideas of the Interstellar Union, which they convey to us, this is a flying ship.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Now we'll move away from the concepts of the Interstellar Union. You, not knowing "Cassiopeia," open the Bible and start reading. What does that mean to you?
Maxim: I don't know. Maybe some kind of spiritual object, some kind of Spirit in the form of a cloud.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What is a “cloud” anyway?
Maxim: A cloud is a material object, a clot.
Irina (Mirrah Count): But it has a specific shape and color. Right?
Maxim: Well, yes. White, elliptical, spherical, or circular.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, first of all, it comes in different forms.
Maxim: Well, yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): But it doesn't say what shape the cloud is. It just says "cloud." But what does a verb like "took him" mean to you?
Maxim: Hmm. (laughs)
Irina: Funny. Well, what does that say?
Maxim: I think this tells me that He went up there.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So what does "took" mean? Does it mean "absorbed"?
Maxim: Well, if it works, it works.
Irina (Mirrah Count): So he’s there…
Maxim: …turned out to be.
Irina (Mirrah Count): He entered it.
Maxim: Yes, into this cloud.
Irina (Mirrah Count): And why did Christ God enter into the cloud if he simply ascended into heaven?
Irina (Mirrah Count): So maybe this is exactly what is designated as “ascension on a cloud in heaven.”
Irina (Mirrah Count): So without a cloud He could not ascend there, Almighty God?
Maxim: I agree with you.
Irina : So, what do you think? How do you like this discussion?
Maxim: Mirrah Count, our broadcast time is coming to an end.
56:25 Thanks to Mirrah Count, curator of the Cassiopeia Project.
Maxim: Thank you so much for overseeing our Project. I've been in dialogue with you for about five years now. I was very surprised when I learned who you are for the Christian religious egregor.
Irina: It’s not for nothing that he asks about this cloud, because he has a direct relationship with it.
Maxim: I know that too, I remember that too. You talked about how you accompanied Jesus everywhere on Earth.
Irina (Mirrach Count): Yes.
Maxim: I want to thank you because the Cassiopeia Project has brought people a tremendous amount of information, a tremendous amount of awareness, and Love. It has helped many people overcome crises, helped them survive. Our Project has opened many people's eyes to the perception of reality, and ignited many. Therefore, as the Project's leader on this planet, I want to thank you for your guidance and for your patience.
Because we humans are very interesting creatures. We have a very interesting genotype, and we have different psychological types. And how you tolerate all this, I don't understand. How you preserve it all, I also don't understand. But I want to thank you for your kindness, for your endurance, for the awareness you bring to the Project, and for overseeing the Project from the perspective of the Interstellar Union.
58:11 Thanks from Mirrah Count.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Maxim, I thank you for taking on the responsibility for the creation and existence of this Project, despite the difficulties it has undoubtedly brought into your life. Therefore, I thank you and send you the Light of my Love and support. Remember that we have incarnated together many times. And I have always been and remain your spiritual brother, supporting you in all your endeavors, regardless of your future decisions.
I also thank Irina for sticking to her chosen path and never deviating from it. I thank Irina for having received certain opportunities for both career growth and financial development in the Cassiopeia Project, yet remaining as pure a person as she was at the beginning.
I also thank all the participants of the Cassiopeia Project for recognizing yourselves as God's beloved children, for experiencing your Higher Self within you, as a part of Him. This Project exists not only to convey information about the Interstellar Union. Its purpose is broader: it is a Project for introducing people to their spiritual part, their Higher Self, and it is connected to self-improvement.
And now I address everyone outside of the Cassiopeia Project. As its director, I can affirm that this Project was created with the goal of increasing Love, awareness, and the quality of life for every person on Earth. Thank you all!
Maxim: Thanks, guys! See you all soon! I hope we'll meet again soon.
Irina: Bye!
Maxim: Bye everyone!
1:00:23 End of video.
January 11, 2025
Conference participants:
Irina Podzorova is a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, with subtle-material civilizations and with the Spiritual world;
Maxim Rusan – head of the Cassiopeia Project and the Center for Spiritual and Physical Development;
Mirrah Count (Archangel Gabriel) is a representative of the planet Burkhad, the keeper of the Christian egregor.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/mirrah-kaunt-o-zhizni-na-burhade-perspektivy-dlya
Cassiopeia #755 Mirrah Count on life on Burkhad, prospects for earthlings. The many facets of the human Spiritual Heart.
00:00 Start of video.
00:12 Conference excerpts.
"The higher the level, the more cells are filled with higher, high-vibrational feelings. And the lower the level, the more cells are filled with lower-vibrational ones."
"Prices will be set by economists: how much your salary will be, how much your pension will be, and so on. What prices will be on Earth will be decided by the Union: the Interstellar Union and Earth economists. They will meet (shows circle) and propose various options. Then a draft will be drawn up."
"The Interstellar Union has ways to significantly reduce the cost of transport production. But I don't think you'll have wheeled vehicles for long. Your government will then have to provide infrastructure, roads, figure out what to do with fuel, and so on."
"Get ready, we're about to turn off artificial gravity." The first time a flight like this happens, the kids are 10 or 11 years old, in your opinion."
01:42 Broadcast begins. Participants are introduced.
Irina: Hello, dear friends! My name is Irina Podzorova. I am a contactee with extraterrestrial and subtle-material civilizations, with the Spiritual World. Today, with us is the curator of our Cassiopeia project, Mirrah Count from the planet Burkhad. As a reminder, his spiritual name is Archangel Gabriel. Michael has questions for him.
Mikhail: Hello! My name is Mikhail Vladilenovich. I am a man from planet Earth. Mirrah Count, perhaps you know, there is a planet in a distant "sleeve." I am from it. So is Irina.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, I know this planet well.
02:33 Mirrah Count on his previous incarnations.
Mikhail : The questions will concern your succession of incarnations, if you're ready to open up. How you've traveled your path. I'd like you to choose a particular segment, the most interesting, the most important for you. Perhaps the segment when you ascended to the 24th level and beyond. Your path is very interesting, because we want to go there too. At least I do.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It's best to discuss this with your non-embodied Spirit. Since I'm in a body, I have my own understanding of incarnations. I'll speak from the perspective of this incarnation. I'll speak from what I know, since I'm in a body. My Higher Self stores information about my incarnations and provides what's useful for this incarnation. But not all of it.
The Soul learns fully about its incarnations, the moments that were significant in each incarnation, and the experiences the Spirit underwent after uniting with the Spirit, after disembodiment. Each Spirit enters a specific incarnation to fulfill its own tasks, designed for that type of body, incarnation, and world. This even applies to a specific family, if we consider ancestral tasks.
I asked, connecting with my Higher Self, with the disembodied part of the Spirit, and it showed me the sequence of my incarnations. In general. I already told you. Was there a conference with you?
Irina : Not with him. But I remember you talking about it. When, where, you incarnated on Earth…
(Mirrah Count) Yes, I've already been asked. I've incarnated on Earth in both the subtle and dense planes, on Burkhad, and so on. I've shared the information I know during my incarnation. Moreover, if we're talking specifically about a particular incarnation, my Higher Self must create a phantom that will contain the memory. Based on my experience on Burkhad, which I went through over 6,000 Earth years ago, I have certain concepts, a language, a worldview that may differ from the worldview, language, and fundamental concepts of any other incarnation. And I will unwittingly distort their worldview, refracting it through my own.
06:57 About manvantaras, incarnations of Spirits, God from the point of view of the material world.
Michael: Tell me, please, when was the first manvantara and was there one?
Irina (Mirrah Count): The first manvantara? From the perspective of the material world, of course there was. From the perspective of the Spiritual World, it's complicated. Any of them could have been both the first and the last at the same time.
Mikhail: On Earth, the world is material. We measure time in hours, minutes, years, centuries, and manvantaras.
Irina (Mirrah Count): From a material perspective, everything has a beginning. Including the first appearance of the material world. There was a time when "there was nothing." We trace back to a time when there were no manvantaras, and then there was the appearance of the first. The word "first" refers to the beginning of the existence of God, the Source of all. But since God is infinite and eternal in time, then from the point of view of Divine meaning, all these manvantaras are infinite. From the perspective of the material world, naturally, there was a beginning, just as there is a beginning to this world.
Mikhail: You mentioned "the beginning of God." So, did He also have a beginning in terms of the material world? Was there a time when He didn't?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Did I say that?
Michael: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Did I say there was a time when He was not there?
Michael: No. That's my question.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It has been said many times that there was no such time.
Mikhail: I see. What happens to the Spirits at the end of a manvantara? Is there a return of experience, some special state worth mentioning?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Everyone finds themselves at the spiritual level they attained in their last incarnation. They remain in this state until the next manvantara begins.
Mikhail: With such a number of manvantaras, it was once said that there are more than 17,000 of them.
Irina (Mirrah Count): There are many more.
Michael: How much more?
Irina: It shows a number... I see "17" and 186 zeros.
Michael: Wow.
Irina: I don't know. He wrote that "the contactee doesn't have this number in his memory." It's difficult to express this concept, so I'll illustrate it with an image. He showed "17," "0," and at the top of the zero, "186."
Mikhail: More than Dukhov. There are 35 zeros there. And here there are 176.
Irina: 186.
10:30 The connection of feelings and desires with the Spiritual levels and "cells" of the Spiritual heart. Unfulfilled karma.
Mikhail: 186. Horrible! Here's a question: we've been born many times, but perhaps not everyone was born at the very beginning, from the perspective of the material world. Many of us have gone through a colossal number of incarnations. In each incarnation, we lived, created, produced, understood something. It amazes me that, with so many incarnations, there remain blocks, room for growth. For some reason, some end up on the first level, others on the seventeenth. I'm talking about the spiritual level. You'd think that after so many incarnations, we could have become smarter. Are we going in circles? Are we "pulling out the tail, but the head is stuck"?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Did I understand you correctly? Are you asking about the meaning of incarnations?
Mikhail: No. I'm saying that I have a lot of experience, but no brains. To put it bluntly.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What do you mean by “no brain”?
Mikhail: We do stupid things. We don't understand that the most important thing is the spiritual...
Irina (Mirrah Count): I need an example to explain why. What do you call a stupid act?
Mikhail: Well, okay. Let's take my life. I came into this world and didn't know there was a Spiritual World. I thought there was only matter. Based on this concept, I lived and committed stupid acts, from a reality standpoint.
Irina (Mirrah Count): More specifically.
Mikhail: Should I tell you straight?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Of course. Your words will serve as an example for others.
Michael: This is a bad example.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What did you do that you consider stupid and why?
Mikhail: I don't consider my actions stupid. Okay. Let's take an example...
Irina (Mirrah Count): Don't you think so? You said you did stupid things.
Mikhail: I'm speaking generally. That humanity is committing stupid...
Irina (Mirrah Count): If you didn't consider them stupid, you wouldn't call them that. People pronounce names based on their own understanding, their own vocabulary. Every word has a meaning for them. To be understood by you, Irina, and everyone watching this conference (I'm perfectly aware that I'm attending), I need to talk not about abstract stupid behavior, but about concrete things.
Mikhail: Okay. I have a car, and I want to buy another one because this one is no good. They send me another car. I can pay the money later. It's very good. But I think it's too expensive. I'd better look for something cheaper. And I start looking. I realize there's no point in doing this because they're giving me a good one. Even if it costs more money. I don't have the full amount. Perhaps God knows my needs, and I'll get the money, I'll receive it. Nevertheless, I start looking for a cheaper one. In the end, nothing works. I calm down and realize that this particular car they're giving me is the "right" one. After all, I know the Spiritual World. I feel like this car is being given to me anyway; it's just coming into my hands. Why am I looking for something? Yet, I still do it. But isn't that stupid?
Irina (Mirrah Count): I'll answer. No, you're not stupid. You're satisfying your needs. I don't see anything stupid here. I understand what you're saying.
Here at Burkhad, things work a little differently. But I understand what financial flows are. You're simply looking for ways to fulfill your desires, to meet your needs. Desire is a conscious need. These two words are opposites: cheaper and more expensive. They denote different financial values, different amounts of financial energy devoted to these objects.
If you started looking for something, then you have a specific desire. You were fulfilling the program of your desire, your need. Your first need is to buy a car. Your second need is to direct some of the financial energy you call money toward something else.
Your capabilities didn't match reality. Your capabilities and desires conflicted. If you started looking for something cheaper, it meant you wanted to spend the rest of your money on something else. That is, to fulfill some other need. These are internal contradictions that many people experience.
Why do they exist? Because the Spiritual Heart of a person, like that of any intelligent Spirit, contains a multitude of desires and feelings, often contradictory. This is possible due to the special structure of the Spiritual Heart of an intelligent Spirit. Each feeling and desire is contained within a separate compartment of the Spiritual Heart. Just as you fill various drawers and compartments in a refrigerator with food, so too can the Spiritual Heart be filled with various energies, even those of opposing vibrations. This makes the Spirit freer and more capable of adapting to changing conditions.
Moreover, this makes possible the existence of 24 levels of the Spiritual World. Not just two opposites, where there is only Light and Darkness, love and hate. Two opposite poles. There are shades between them. And they are possible only thanks to the special structure of the Spiritual Heart.
Therefore, you had different desires, directed at different objects. And you chose between them, which would help you fulfill your need. When you chose your path and abandoned it, decided to return... That is, you chose the path of searching for a cheap car and abandoned it, returning to buying a more expensive one. This, too, does not indicate stupidity. The choice may not be immediate. It can change. While the Spirit is in the body, it can change its decisions very often. This depends on the inner world, character type, worldview, and so on. We are observing the natural process of internal contradictions.
Mikhail: Thank you very much. I understand. I suggest we return to the question of the number of incarnations each person has...
Irina: I understand. He replied that it wasn't stupid, but a natural process.
Mikhail: I don't want to make excuses. What my Spiritual Heart tells me must be accepted and acted upon, and not doubted. It's ironclad.
Irina (Mirrah Count): You can know with your mind, but that doesn't eliminate the contradictions within, in the Spiritual Heart. And an unfulfilled desire doesn't disappear. It must either be realized or transformed into a different energy.
Mikhail: Thank you. Still, with so many incarnations... Could there be billions of them?
Irina (Mirrah Count): If we take all the manvantaras, of course.
Mikhail: Yes. Billions. How can we "fall into childhood"? How can we sink to such a low level? Everyone must understand this.
Irina (Mirrah Count): How will you understand if a new personality is formed with each incarnation?
Mikhail: A new personality is being formed. Question: Are we 30% incarnated?
Irina (Mirrach Count): On Earth.
Mikhail: So, 70% is there. When we disembodiment... Let's say we've ascended to the 24th level, the maximum. We've connected with the Higher Self. How does the Higher Self accept this? Does it ascend to the 24th level, or is it at a different level?
Irina (Mirrah Count): No. Same level.
Mikhail: One and the same. So, all together? And next time you incarnate as a different part?
Irina (Mirrah Count): What do you mean by “the other part”?
Mikhail: There was a phrase like that in one of the programs. We incarnate as a whole. 30% came to Earth, incarnated, raised or lowered their level, merged with the Higher Self, and then the rest incarnates. Isn't that true?
Irina (Mirrah Count): The Soul is assembled anew each time with different characteristics and with different karma, which is part of the karma of the entire Spirit.
Mikhail: A different personality. What happens to the old karma from a past incarnation?
Irina (Mirrah Count): There is unrealized karma. You, like any Spirit, took with you a portion of the Spirit's karma into this incarnation. The rest remained with the Higher Self in an unrealized state, awaiting future incarnations.
Mikhail: So it's a different part. And in your next incarnation, you take on a different chunk of karma to work through?
Irina (Mirrach Count): Yes.
Mikhail: Are we gradually purifying everything or “polluting” it?
Irina (Mirrah Count): I say again that the Spiritual Heart is multifaceted.
Mikhail: You spoke of "cells of the Spiritual Heart." Can we talk about the number of these "cells"?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Everyone has their own feelings and desires. It's very individual. You can't say I have a thousand and you have four. And you can't say "I have a thousand and you have a thousand." It can be higher or lower. The heart can restructure itself.
Unlike a material "refrigerator," in which the "shelves" can be reconfigured, this spiritual structure is highly changeable and adaptive, and has no rigid material limitations. What you call form.
Mikhail: I created "cells" for myself as a plan for the future. I must fill each "cell" by experiencing a certain state and experience?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Different "cells" can be filled with different and identical feelings and desires. The higher the level, the more "cells" are filled with high-vibrational feelings. The lower the level, the more "cells" are filled with low-vibrational ones.
Why did I switch to the term "cells"? Because many contactees on Earth transmitted information through more tangible images than the "Spiritual Heart." I noticed that in many cases, people understood it better.
Mikhail: I'm very grateful to you. I had no idea it was done that way.
Irina (Mirrah Count): You could say "cell" or "part." These are material terms. You could say "feeling" or "desire." I used the term "cell," which is more familiar to your material consciousness, like a closet, a refrigerator, a box where everything is sorted into compartments. Imagine a box. For example, a school pencil case. You put pens, pencils, and other things in there. At the same time, you can put the same thing in there.
27:50 Feelings as part of the science of "psychology of the Spirit." Teaching at MS.
Mikhail: You said that spiritual feelings and experiences are located in different "cells." How many higher feelings are there?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Let's count together. What feelings do you know?
Michael: The highest feeling is love.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Several types of love.
Michael: A lot.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It depends on what it's aimed at. What is love? For you, what is it?
Mikhail: A feeling of joy and unity with God. Or with the part of God that I see.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Joy arises as a response to unity. As an emotion, it arises as a response to the expression of love, both by you and towards you. Do you understand what I mean?
Michael: Yes, I understand.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Of course, in our consciousness, feelings of love and emotions of joy merge. It's a single process in consciousness. The science of "Spiritual Psychology" breaks down this process and examines which of them are on the spiritual level, which on the energetic, etheric, and physical.
We have special textbooks for schools that describe all of this. Every feeling is listed in a table. It shows what vibration it is, how it arises, in which chakra, how it manifests in the Spirit, in the etheric field, and in the physical body.
(Irina): How do you like these tables?
Michael: At school or in the Spiritual World where Angels are taught?
Irina (Mirrah Count): At school, in the Interstellar Union.
Mikhail: The tables aren't particularly interesting. It's more interesting to experience it all emotionally, to see it.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I mean, how do you like teaching children like that?
Michael: Teaching children?
Irina (Mirrah Count): At school. We begin Spiritual Psychology in first grade. We call classes cycles. We have three cycles: junior, middle, and senior. Each cycle includes specific subjects. This is clearer for you. They are divided into those in junior, middle, and high school. Do you understand what I mean?
Mikhail: Okay. How old is a child when they begin studying Spiritual Psychology? You're older than us.
Irina (Mirrah Count): A little less than a year in our time. About six years in yours.
Michael: Psychology of the Spirit?
Irina (Mirrach Count): Of course.
Mikhail: Do the children understand? You have all sorts of devices there. All of this is brought in.
Irina (Mirrah Count): When did you first learn math? How did you understand it?
Mikhail: Mathematics can be different too. Sometimes it's "one plus one equals two."
Irina (Mirrah Count): Spiritual psychology can also be presented in different ways and with different details, just like mathematics. Teaching a child to write numbers and add them together—isn't that the same as teaching them to solve equations? But both are mathematics. They are based on mathematical laws. The same goes for reading. The child learns the alphabet, to read. They study the alphabet of their people, the country where they live. They learn to combine letters into words. This can also be difficult for them. They don't understand why letters represent concepts they already know. They need to undergo a restructuring of their consciousness. Do you understand what I'm talking about?
Michael: Yes, I understand.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Think of a child. They look at a word. They need to figure out what letter it is, what letters it's made of, read it, and understand what it means. If they've been doing this for a long time, they'll look at the word and immediately understand. The process happens automatically.
Also, Spiritual Psychology. In the first cycle, Spiritual Psychology contains simple diagrams and tables, labeled in simple terms for children, about how the Spirit is structured and where the Spiritual World is located. These are basic concepts. In the middle and advanced cycles, more complex topics begin: the content of feelings, desires, instinctual programs, and their influence on the chakras. It's like algebra or geometry, only on a spiritual level. How do you like this kind of study?
Michael: Great. Amazing.
Okay. Tell me, please, how can you not grow spiritually with such an education? You were born on Burkhad, you came from the tenth level. They explained everything to you, explained it all. We know nothing about this. You were shown that there is God, the Universe.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I can also ask. How come when you study mathematics, not everyone becomes Isaac Newton? Because not everyone wants to study it, not everyone is interested in it. Some just want to do their own thing. It doesn't interest them.
Mikhail: No desire. I understand.
Irina (Mirrah Count): You could say it's a certain talent—an aptitude for mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology. You also teach science in school, that is, subjects based on science. But not all students, upon leaving school, go into these professions. May I ask, why did they teach them? Perhaps to finish school. Perhaps they weren't interested at all.
There are studies of adults on Earth. Psychologists conduct the tests. Adults (they've already graduated from high school, they're 30-40 years old) answer questions covering the school curriculum, for example, for the fifth or sixth grade. They graduated from high school about 20 years ago. Their children, who are still in school, answer the same questions. Psychologists conducted the studies and found that adults perform 40% worse on these tasks than their children. Funny?
36:27 Robotics, social protection, and employment for Burkhad residents. Medical development.
Mikhail: Of course, there's nothing funny about it. We know that. We on Earth are afraid of artificial intelligence, robots. What will we do? But you've had everything robotized for a long time.
Irina (Mirrah Count): You will live and enjoy your feelings.
Mikhail: I don't understand what your people do? Okay. There are scientists. But what about the masses? Where do they work? What do they do?
Irina (Mirrah Count): She's creative, traveling, researching, studying the work of others. A lot of things. If you were transported to Earth, what would you do? What if robots did your work? You'd watch movies, read books, form literary clubs, like studying "Crime and Punishment." You adults would debate the character of Raskolnikov. Can you imagine? You don't have time right now?
Michael: Yes.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Then you'll come to the club not to drink beer and dance, but to have a serious conversation about writers, poets, read poetry, watch a film. Then stay and discuss it.
Mikhail: We have that.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It will be massive. There will be creative clubs. People will post their creations: drawings, poems, songs, dances. Everything that people want to do now, but because they need to provide for themselves, they can't afford it.
Mikhail: You work too. You get paid.
Irina (Mirrach Count): Yes.
Mikhail: Plates cost money.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I'm talking about representatives of those professions that we don't have, who have been replaced by robots.
Mikhail: You say, "Discuss in clubs." You have financial security. Someone doesn't work, doesn't want to, and says, "I want to discuss Dostoevsky."
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, please. The state will appoint him as a literary scholar for a salary. Please, discuss, lecture, gather people. You'll earn money.
Mikhail: Blogger.
Irina (Mirrah Count): She'll be in the literary field. She'll receive a government salary.
Mikhail: The state is looking for a reason to pay a person money.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Pay money, if we are talking about a literary scholar, for the fact that he invests in his literary development and helps others in this.
Mikhail: Are there those who do nothing at all?
Irina (Mirrah Count): No. We have professions. He was paid a salary, some kind of benefits, if he'd already worked for a certain period of time and wanted to retire. We have pension provision. According to certain rules. Ours is more individualized than yours. As for support, if he has a temporary illness or injury, society will support him. They will actively treat him, clarify the spiritual causes. He will have to attend discussions with doctors, therapists, and spiritual psychologists. Only under these conditions can he receive benefits. According to our law, those who are disabled in your country would be socialized as much as possible and paid a salary in a field where they can work.
Mikhail: We had that. The country I grew up in, the Soviet Union, socialized everyone. No one was ever left alone.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I know you have disabled people, pensions, and disability benefits. I understand perfectly well that this is right in your society, as your medicine has not yet reached the perfection that it can correct the physical body at the hormonal, cellular, and genetic levels. If your medicine could do this, it would. Currently, your medicine is only just developing... You have drugs, vaccines, chemicals, but no energetic component. It's still too early. You haven't mastered all these frequencies.
We have both energy medicine and physical medicine. We have chemical factories that can produce any substance you need in the required quantity in 20-30 minutes. Synthesis. We have specialized synthesizers. Synthesis is no problem on any planet. Anyone can buy a synthesizer and assemble it from simple elements using a formula they input.
Mikhail: You shouldn't have said that.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Why?
Mikhail: Many people on Earth immediately began to think about substances.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Which ones?
Mikhail: We have substances that we call “substances.”
Irina (Mirrah Count): I know what you're talking about. Distributing such mind-altering substances without antidotes is a crime in the Interstellar Union. If they're produced on a personal synthesizer (the formulas are all known and can be found) and distributed to people without antidotes, without special licenses, it's considered a dangerous crime against human health and life. For this, the offender will be sent to a criminal planet for 12 Earth years.
Mikhail: 12 years is not a child's time. A lot.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It is possible to harm other people's bodies for profit.
Mikhail: And for yourself?
Irina (Mirrah Count): If you do it yourself without antidotes, your own body will be destroyed. This is the humanoid's choice. They will quickly become noticeable in society and will behave inappropriately. They may be isolated in special medical facilities.
If he uses a synthesizer to make "substances" for himself and an antidote, that's his right. How can we limit it? Synthesizers are sold everywhere.
45:05 Trading on Burkhad.
Mikhail: Okay. That was a joke. I get it. Okay. I understand about work. Tell me, how do you shop? We think there's going to be a shopping revolution. All supermarkets and stores will disappear. Bots will appear that will search for cheaper, better-reviewed items for us. How do you do that? Does something teleport directly to your home, or do you actually shop there?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, we have teleporters. Teleportation chambers that can transport various goods. We have cargo ships that transport various goods from planet to planet, as far as orders go.
There are stores. There are practically no salespeople. Humanoids won't do that. We have biorobots and special programs. It works differently. You come to the store, there's a screen on the wall. The screen lists the products and prices. By clicking on it, you see all the product specifications. Then, just like in an online store (app), you put them in a special basket and pay. A robot takes them out of the store, like from a warehouse, for you. There are stores where everything is displayed on the shelves. Robots serve.
Mikhail: Will all this still be available here? We thought it would only be online.
Irina: Let's ask. How are the markets?
Michael: Markets.
Irina (Mirrah Count): If you want, please. I don't think anyone would want to stand in the marketplace in an infrastructure that could do it for them. A person would save up money, buy a biorobot that would do the shopping for them and sell their goods. Meanwhile, the humanoid would go about its business.
47:51 Biorobots.
Mikhail: I'm interested in biorobots. Are they grown? Why are they "bio"? Do they have iron parts? Are they grown or made?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Few biorobots have metal parts. They're not metal. They can have various metal parts made of metal-plastic. Plastic with metal embedded in it. There are materials that make up the frame. You call it the skeleton.
But the biorobot is soft and warm on the outside. It's made of biopolymers that mimic human skin. The biorobot's appearance can be customized. Its face and head shape are molded using a specific template (this represents the mold into which the biopolymer material is poured and, under heat and pressure, hardens).
Mikhail: Why do you call them biorobots? They're plastic. I suppose "bio" could contain living cells?
Irina (Mirrah Count): There are different types of biorobots. We call them biorobots because they have a brain made of biopolymers. Programs are inserted into them, making the robot resemble a human. They are called "biorobots" because they can talk and perform tasks. They can walk, run, and carry out orders. A certain amount of memory is downloaded into their brain, which contains all the words of a language. Not just one language. Knowledge from different fields can be downloaded. It is given a name. It responds to its name. Not a set of numbers, but a name, often reminiscent of a human name. Let's say, Ivan. Biorobots talk and answer questions. Their sensors can perceive words and react to them. Ask a question, and it will answer you. Tell it to do something, and it will do it.
They are usually charged by sunlight. There are microprocessors and microchips on the scalp and hands that receive energy from sunlight. Energy is released by extracting oxygen and hydrogen atoms from the air with the help of light. The process is somewhat similar to photosynthesis, only without chlorophyll. It's on a different level.
The biorobot stores energy and can operate not only during the day but also at night. It typically needs 15-20 minutes of exposure to sunlight per day to recharge. This applies to Burkhad. We have different solar activity. If we're talking about Earth, this time must be increased or different technologies must be found. With your sunlight, the sun has a different spectrum than ours and produces a different amount of energy. This time can increase to two or three hours. It depends on the robot.
Robots come in different forms. Biorobots are so named because they resemble humans and their actions: they speak and answer questions. They are often dressed in human clothing. It's an imitation.
Mikhail: We have something similar too.
Irina (Mirrah Count): They can be nannies for children. Biorobots that watch over children and play with them. They can act as police or an army on a planet, if one exists. Even though there's no war, having an army on a planet in the Interstellar Union isn't prohibited. It can perform various functions. Law enforcement. If a planet joins the Interstellar Union, it retains its army. A law is passed. Any laws regarding mandatory military service, if any, are repealed, because, from the Interstellar Union's perspective, this violates free will. With each generation, fewer people join the army, as they lose interest.
Armies and police forces, that is, the security forces on many planets of the Interstellar Union, are being partially or completely replaced by special biorobots that carry out law enforcement commands.
They can be trained in the use of weapons during arrests and in forceful combat techniques. They are considered the best police officers because they are incorruptible. They always follow their program, even if it's a law or a code. They are not afraid of pain. They have no fear. For example, fear of pain or death.
When confronted by a humanoid, a biorobot will, following its programming, restrain the humanoid as best it can, minimizing harm to its health. There is no danger of it becoming enraged or exceeding the limits of necessary self-defense. At the same time, it is more difficult to incapacitate a biorobot than a human with weapons or combat techniques. They are immune to pain techniques and blows that would otherwise affect a human or a humanoid. Therefore, many planetary governments are purchasing large numbers of biorobots to maintain law and order and apprehend criminals.
Mikhail: We have movies. "Robocops." But they're made of iron. Buying a home robot is expensive.
Irina (Mirrah Count): They can work in various industries: build houses, roads, work in stores. It depends on the program. A domestic robot can clean, cook, and go grocery shopping. Programs can be changed. There are special stations for reprogramming biorobots. This erases the previous "electronic personality," as we call it, and replaces it with a new one.
57:30 Cost of goods on Burkhad. Personal income and taxes. MS budget.
Mikhail: How much does a robot like this cost?
Irina (Mirrah Count): We need to compare it with something, how expensive is it?
Mikhail: How much work would it take to discuss Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" to buy such a robot?
Irina (Mirrach Count): Yes, of course.
Mikhail: How many Dostoevsky novels do you need to discuss to buy such a robot?
Irina (Mirrah Count): We have different payment criteria. We need to compare it with something you have.
Mikhail: Okay. How many meters of trench do I need to dig to buy a biorobot? For a person of average build.
Irina: Let's ask what their prices are for their goods?
Mikhail: Flying saucers, we already know, are not very expensive.
Irina (Mirrah Count): We have a law on our planet, as we do throughout the Interstellar Union. A child is born—a future member of our society. Society begins investing in them, paying their parents allowances for their development. It's different for everyone. It depends on the economy. If we're talking about Burkhad, a child receives about six and a half thousand special units, called "litya" in Burkhad, every month until they reach adulthood.
Michael: 6000?
Irina (Mirrah Count): 6000 and a half.
Mikhail: Six and a half thousand castings.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes. A home biorobot with basic cooking and cleaning functions (it displays about 300 square meters). Its basic skills include cleaning and cooking (usually 150 dishes are stored in its memory). The language costs about 2,800 of these same units.
Mikhail: You can buy three robots per month.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It's called a "housekeeping robot." The nanny robot costs (I looked in the store) 3,000 - 3,200.
Mikhail: Are these different robots? Nanny and... They're not different firmware, but different robots? Are they built differently?
Irina (Mirrah Count): The prices vary depending on the program.
Mikhail: Can you reprogram me into a nanny or not?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, you can. But changing the program costs between 350 and 650 units, depending on the difficulty.
Mikhail: “The prices are biting.”
Irina (Mirrah Count): As for food, since we are vegetarians, we only eat plant-based foods.
Mikhail: You can synthesize substances, right?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes. We have people who like to grow (shows) natural ones from cells.
Mikhail: How much is at the market?
Irina (Mirrah Count): We have various fruits, which you call fruits, berries. Juices. What you call... (shows a short plant. On it grows black, round fruits, like nuts in a shell). I don't know what to compare it to on Earth.
Michael: Tell me...
Irina (Mirrah Count): I will say that nutrition.
Mikhail: Meals per day.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Monthly food costs the average person 1,200. We have a minimum of groceries. It costs 1,200-1,250, depending on whether the humanoid lives in a large city or a small settlement. 1,200-1,300 is the basic food needed to maintain one's strength.
Mikhail: Quite a bit. If everything is done by robots, and robots are made by robots, why does it cost so much?
Irina (Mirrah Count): My salary in your month is 38,700 units.
Mikhail: You have a good salary. You're not a blogger. Why such prices? After all, everything is done by robots. Robots are made by robots, too. Robot programs are apparently made by robots, too. Where do these prices come from? Why isn't it free?
Irina (Mirrah Count): The money raised goes toward supplying factories, robots for exchange with other planets, and supporting science. A percentage of each purchase, called a tax, goes to the Interstellar Union.
Mikhail: It's small. One and a half percent, or 0.1 percent.
Irina (Mirrah Count): It's built into every purchase, not into your salary. Everyone who sells goods sends a percentage to the Interstellar Union. This forms the Interstellar Union budget. Interstellar Union economists manage this budget. Many young people on the planets Burkhad and Disaru dream of learning this profession.
Mikhail: What profession?
Irina (Mirrah Count): An economist who works for the Interstellar Union.
Michael: Oh my God! Will there really be economists in 20 million years?
Irina (Mirrah Count): Of course. We have the numbers. We need to work with them. A portion of the Interstellar Union budget is always allocated to research and maintaining contact with planets that aren't part of the Interstellar Union. The curators receive their salaries from this budget.
Mikhail: Ira, I understand.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Spaceships are being acquired. The planet of Kirkhiton, Irina's physical curator, has allocated a grant for contactee research. He receives part of his salary from his planet, Daraal, and part from the Interstellar Union as a specialist. The Interstellar Union provided the Daraal government with a certain number of ships for space exploration. The Daraal government provided one of them to Kirkhiton. He later acquired his own personal transport. Curators sometimes have official transport, and sometimes they have personal transport.
The budget is spent on providing for children and on the salaries of specialists. With their purchases, consumers ensure their own existence and that of the entire economic system.
Mikhail: I have the impression that 95% of taxes (still free) are done by robots.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Yes, that's right. Robots aren't paid, of course. But that doesn't mean we don't have a population.
1:07:17 Unification of finances upon Earth's entry into the MS. Purchase of a spacecraft by an earthling.
Mikhail: I get the idea. One more question. When a new world is accepted into the Interstellar Union, you said spaceships will arrive, the economy will improve, businesses will open, and people will travel to other planets. But where will they get the money? We don't produce anything.
Irina (Mirrah Count): They'll arrive here almost immediately after Earth is accepted into the Interstellar Union. Within a week, at the most. A group of economists will arrive. They'll integrate your financial system into ours, the Interstellar Union's. To do this, the real value of your monetary units will be determined. They don't necessarily have to be converted into Interstellar Union units. Many planets have their own units. Special exchange offices will be set up at every spaceport, and even in every city, especially the larger ones. You'll exchange them there after the real value of your banknotes has been determined. For example, your purchasing power.
Mikhail: Mirrah Count, you're talking about exchangers, exchange. An exchange can be equal. You give us plates, and we'll give you forks. What can we give you?
Irina (Mirrah Count): The simplest. Factories and shops will be built here, including those of the Interstellar Union.
Mikhail: That's later. And when you first arrive, you said you'd open space bases. We'll fly right away. And how will we finance the flight? We can't exchange the money we have.
Irina (Mirrah Count): If you're in the Interstellar Union, you'll be paid money, which you can use to buy a ticket. With your own money. You'll work for the Interstellar Union, in its structures that will be on Earth. You'll fly because you'll be paid in money, your own. You can use it to buy a ticket. You can exchange it for general galactic money somewhere in the galaxy, or on the specific planet you'll be landing on.
Prices will be set by economists: your salary, your pension. Prices on Earth will be decided by the Union: the Interstellar Union, Earth's economists. They will gather (shows a circle) and propose options. A draft with specific proposals will be drawn up. This draft will be communicated to every citizen of Earth, wherever they live. There will be a vote: accept or reject, and discussion.
While your planet is financially integrating into the Interstellar Union, a transition period will be established. During this transition period, planets are assigned a special government. Most often, they receive special subsidies from the Interstellar Union, which are distributed among their citizens from the budget. The results of this work go not only to Earth but also to the Interstellar Union.
Everything happens smoothly and gradually. It's not sudden, like "everything changes suddenly." This usually happens without any steps that could lead to a price collapse or a rapid rise. Everything happens smoothly, so there's neither a budget deficit nor a budget surplus.
Mikhail: Now everything is clear. Mirrah Count, thank you very much. I think I won't buy a car. I'll save up for a plate.
Irina: I wonder how much it will cost in rubles. Let's do the math.
Mikhail: Shall we calculate in rubles? Fine. I can dig a trench 20 meters long and a meter deep in a day.
Irina (Mirrah Count): We need to do the math. How many loaves of bread does one car cost?
Mikhail: It's expensive now...
Irina (Mirrah Count): Let's count.
Mikhail: Okay. A million. A loaf of bread is 100 rubles. A million minus six zeros. Minus two. That's four zeros – 40 thousand.
Irina: He says it's a bit expensive.
Mikhail: It's a good car. It's not a flying saucer. It's reliable, it drives on the ground. It has four wheels. You fill it up with gas and go. It's nothing compared to a flying saucer.
Irina (Mirrah Count): He smiles and says, "We in the Interstellar Union have ways to significantly reduce the cost of vehicle production. But I don't think you'll have wheeled vehicles for long. Your government will need to provide infrastructure, roads, figure out what to do with fuel, and so on. The fuel you have emits carbon dioxide. The laws of the Interstellar Union will require various filters to prevent carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere. The factories producing these vehicles will have to purchase these filters. They will abandon production because it's unprofitable. A filter prevents emissions. Each automobile factory will have a technologist monitoring quality. This could be a biorobot. If, through special measurements, it detects excess levels of certain substances in the exhaust gases, it will not allow the vehicle to be released onto the market."
You'll have to buy filters from Tashig, where they're made. You won't have these factories. You'll have to build them first. This could lead to a price increase that won't satisfy consumers on Earth. What should a car manufacturer do? Switch to producing cheaper cars. They can sell them profitably.
Mikhail: Okay. How much would that be for a million, for 40,000 loaves of bread? We wanted to buy a flying saucer.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I understand. A whole mountain of loaves of bread. We won't talk about it now. I know roughly the value of your money in gold and silver, and other metals that can be determined. I can tell you that right now there's a flying saucer, a three-seater, small, about 12 meters in diameter...
Michael: Is it small?
Irina (Mirrah Count): 10-12 meters in diameter, 3-3.5 meters high, domed, standard. It contains a planetary atmospheric and gravity drive with "jump" capability. Six continuous "jump" cycles for 30 light years. A standard carbon-helium-hydrogen gravity drive weighs 700 kilograms. Such a "dish" will cost 200-300 thousand rubles.
Mikhail: We can take three for our car.
Irina (Mirrah Count): Will the exchange be ok?
Mikhail: You said it weighs 700 kilograms for 30 light years... 12 meters in diameter and only 700 kilograms!
Irina (Mirrah Count): It's made of lightweight metals (demonstrates), alloys that minimize weight. The less weight, the more equipment can be installed. It won't be equipped with artificial gravity. That's a separate device. It needs to be purchased and installed.
Mikhail: Will you fly in zero gravity?
Irina: Like me with Kirkhiton.
Mikhail: But they sent you a cheap "plate".
Irina (Mirrah Count): The Interstellar Union paid me for weightlessness.
Mikhail: On the contrary, we have zero gravity for a fee. We have gravity, but we don't have zero gravity on Earth.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What do you need it for?
Mikhail: Interesting. We've never experienced weightlessness. When we jump into the water, there's half a second of weightlessness.
Irina (Mirrah Count): What's interesting about her? (He became interested.)
Mikhail: You're not interested, of course, but we are. I'd love to fly in zero gravity right now.
Irina (Mirrah Count): I remember when children are taken on a space excursion, gravity is turned off several times. They're taken beyond their planet, for example, between the planets of a solar system. They show them different planets (they stage a historical flight) and say, "Now we're going to show you how your ancestors, who didn't have artificial gravity, explored space. Get ready! We're about to turn off artificial gravity." This kind of flight happens for the first time when children are 10 or 11 years old, I think. The pilot counts down and says, "We're going to show you not only the space excursion, but also what the astronauts experienced without artificial gravity."
Some are interested, some are surprised. When they turn it off, it starts... Children react very interestingly the first time: they lose weight. They're unaccustomed to this state and react differently. I don't remember anyone asking to repeat it. I don't think it's a pleasant state. More like a peculiar one.
Mikhail: Ira said you were falling somewhere? Right, Ira?
Irina: How can I tell you? You're sitting here now, but imagine you're driving at high speed. The car hits a bump and bounces. What do you feel?
Michael: I understand.
Irina: Or, for example, you're sitting, and your seat suddenly drops. What would you feel? About the same thing. Just for a second, but then it's constant. What's pleasant about that? I don't know.
Michael: And I don't think it's pleasant.
Irina: Then you get used to it. At first, your head spins, and you might feel a little nauseous. Your temples start pounding because your body mass disappears. It doesn't flow down easily. Even if you hold your head up, there's no gravity. Then you adjust, and it feels like you're in water. Only, unlike in water, where the water holds you up, you're floating in the air, like a herring. If you make any sudden movements—turn your arm—you start spinning. You're clinging...
I remember the first time I lifted myself off the chair (I was taken to the Moon), my first contact with artificial gravity. There was a big ship. But the second time, there wasn't. And I didn't understand what was happening. I tore my hands away from the handles and probably did it too abruptly, with such force that my body rose. And then I wanted to sit up, but I couldn't reach it because I didn't know how to move. Kirkhiton came over, took my hand, and sat me back down. And he said, "Hold on to the handles."
Mikhail: How did he come up? He was flying...
Irina: No. His shoes were stuck to the floor.
Mikhail: Really? Oh my God! That's what happens in the Interstellar Union.
Irina: Yes. Mirrah Count says, "See, even Kirkhiton bought himself special boots that stick to the floor with a magnet. He's never been in zero gravity. Why would he need it? Maybe you'd be interested once or twice. And then, I think, you'd want artificial gravity. Especially if you flew a lot."
Mikhail: Goodbye. Thank you very much for your attention.
Irina: I thank Mirrah Count for his very interesting and engaging answers. I thank Mikhail for his very interesting and insightful questions. I thank my Higher Self for helping me with this connection. I found it very interesting, too.
Dear viewers! I hope you, too, found it interesting to learn about their lives there. We hope that our Earth will finally join the Interstellar Union, whenever that may be. We are doing everything we can to awaken the consciousness of earthlings, so that they can pursue their spiritual development and join the Interstellar Union. Bye everyone!
February 1, 2025
Conference participants:
Irina Podzorova is a contactee with extraterrestrial, subtle-material civilizations and the Spiritual world;
Mikhail Vladilenovich Osipov is a volunteer for the Cassiopeia project and host of online broadcasts on the Cassiopeia TV channel.
Mirrah Count, Archangel Gabriel – representative of the planet Burkhad, keeper of the Christian egregor.
Сообщения
