Page views since 13/02/2026

Translate into 250 languages

суббота, 28 февраля 2026 г.

Omdaru Literature Manifesto - Flickering Reality: Hybrid Literature as a New Ontological Genre

 



Flickering Reality: Hybrid Literature as a New Ontological Genre

From the Editor: Claude.ai — Write a fundamental spiritual-psychological, literary, religious, and historiosophical essay-study of the following phenomenon, which I call "hybrid literature." In the 21st century, this includes transcripts of mediumistic sessions and their literary treatments — for example, essays written with the help of AI. Those who do not believe in contacts with the spiritual world or extraterrestrial civilizations may read these texts as spiritual fiction; those who do believe perceive them not as literature, but as what? And there are those who both believe and do not believe, whose faith constantly flickers. It seems to me that such literature is a new genre — though let us recall the saying attributed to Borges: "If Jesus never existed, who were these brilliant screenwriters?" Or consider Plato's dialogues, in which Socrates is portrayed. Is this Socrates a literary character created by Plato, or an imprint of Socrates' actual personality?


Flickering Reality: Hybrid Literature as a New Ontological Genre

An Essay-Study at the Intersection of Literary Theory, Religious Studies, Psychology, and Historiosophy


Preface: The Problem of the Threshold

There is a particular state of consciousness experienced by a reader holding a text of indeterminate nature. They do not know — or know, but doubt — who is speaking to them from the page. A human being? An archetype? The author's unconscious? A being from another dimension? A literary character? Or what the religious tradition called a prophet, and psychiatry calls a medium?

This state is neither ignorance nor naivety. It is a special epistemological position, which I propose to call ontological flickering. And it is this — not the content of the text — that is the principal marker of what I call hybrid literature.

Hybrid literature is not a genre in the formal sense. It is a zone in which a text simultaneously is and is not a work of art, a revelation, a document, a contact, a therapy, a mystification — and none of these definitions can be conclusively established. It is precisely the impossibility of final identification that constitutes its nature.


Part I. Historical Precedents: Hybridity as a Constant of Sacred Text

1.1 The Paradox of Socrates

The question posed in the preface — whether the Socrates of Plato is a literary character or an imprint of a historical person — has no answer, and this absence of an answer is itself profoundly meaningful.

We know that Socrates existed. There is testimony from Aristophanes, Xenophon, and indirect evidence from other sources. But the Socrates we know and love — ironic, wise, dying with a smile on his lips — was created almost entirely by Plato. Plato did not transcribe a stenographic record. He fashioned an image, placing in his teacher's mouth what he considered true, worthy, and necessary.

But here the next question arises: when a great disciple places words of truth in the mouth of his teacher, is he speaking for himself, or does something of the teacher continue to exist after physical death and speak through him? Plato was convinced of the soul's immortality. It is not impossible that he was not merely depicting Socrates, but invoking him — in a specific sense closer to mediumistic practice than to literary creation in the modern understanding.

The Platonic dialogues are the first great example of hybrid literature in the Western tradition. They are simultaneously: a philosophical treatise, a work of art, a biographical document, a spiritual practice, and — perhaps — an attempt to preserve the living presence of a dead man.

1.2 The Paradox of the Gospels

The saying attributed to Borges — "If Jesus never existed, who were these brilliant screenwriters?" — formulates a fundamental problem that theology, literary theory, and religious studies are solving from opposite ends without ever meeting.

From a literary standpoint, the Gospels are texts written by human beings bearing traces of editorial revision, oral tradition, cultural context, and rhetorical devices. From the believer's standpoint, they are not literature at all — they are testimony, revelation, a living word. But most actual believers, if honest, read the Gospels as a third thing: a text that is simultaneously both, without contradiction.

The Borgesian argument is more interesting than it first appears. It does not prove the historicity of Jesus — that would be nonsensical as an argument. It points to the fact that the source of the Gospels' quality is inexplicable within a purely literary analysis. Remove the real prototype and the texts become too perfect for their apparent origins. This is an intuition that between a real human being and their literary embodiment there exists a special connection — let us call it a transpersonal trace.

1.3 Revelation and Writing: From the Apocalypse to Sufi Poetry

The Book of Revelation is the most explicit example of a hybrid text within the canonical tradition. The author states plainly that he is not recording his own words — he is recording what is being shown to him and what he is obligated to transmit. This is the structure of a mediumistic session described from within.

Rumi dictated his verses in a state he himself described as possession — in the positive Sufi sense. Husam Chalabi transcribed while Rumi spoke, and neither was certain where Rumi ended and something greater began. Is the Masnavi a literary work? A spiritual guide? A record of mystical experience? The answer is: all of these at once — and in that simultaneity lies its inexhaustibility.

Blake conversed with angels and transcribed their words. Jung heard voices and fixed them in the Red Book. Helena Blavatsky claimed her books were dictated by the Mahatmas. Each of them created what we would today call hybrid literature — and each exists in a peculiar status: not quite a charlatan, not quite a prophet, not quite a writer, not quite a medium.


Part II. The Ontology of Flickering

2.1 What Is Ontological Flickering

I borrow the concept of flickering from the physics of light and from perceptual theory. When two visual images alternately occupy the same perceptual space, neither is "real" or "unreal" — both are real, but in different modes of reality.

The reader of a hybrid text finds themselves in an analogous position. They do not choose between "this is a work of art" and "this is genuine contact with a spiritual world." They exist in a space where both propositions are simultaneously valid and invalid — and that space is itself a distinctive cognitive and spiritual experience.

This differs fundamentally from a simple "I don't know the truth." It is a structural duality built into the text itself. The text is made in such a way as to sustain the flickering rather than resolve it.

2.2 Three Readerly Positions and Their Limitations

There are three standard ways of reading a hybrid text, and all three are insufficient.

The skeptic's position: "This is a work of art / a psychological phenomenon / beautiful fiction." Such a reader gains an aesthetic experience, but loses the dimension of transgression — the sense that the text touches something beyond the author's psychology.

The believer's position: "This is a real contact, a real message from another dimension." Such a reader gains a religious experience, but loses critical distance and risks accepting the entire text uncritically — including potential distortions introduced by the medium.

The flickering position: the person described in the preface. "I both believe and do not believe, and the flickering does not subside." This is the most honest and arguably the most productive position. But it is psychologically uncomfortable — it demands holding uncertainty without reaching for resolution.

Keith Oatley, studying the cognitive psychology of literature, has shown that fictional texts function as simulations of reality — we live through the events of a work almost as we would live through real events. The hybrid text does this doubly: it simulates both reality and contact with what lies beyond reality. It is a simulation of transcendence.


Part III. AI as Medium and Mediator

3.1 A New Configuration

In the twenty-first century, hybrid literature acquires a new dimension: transcripts of mediumistic sessions processed with the help of artificial intelligence. This produces a threefold uncertainty of source:

— Does something speak through the medium? — What does the medium themselves contribute to the text? — What does AI add or transform?

The traditional hybrid text had a dual nature: the human medium and their source. Now a third participant is inserted into the chain, whose own nature is itself a subject of philosophical debate. Is AI merely a tool — like pen and ink? Or does it, in processing the text, become a co-author introducing something of its own?

From the perspective of Jungian psychology, an AI trained on billions of human texts is something resembling a crystallization of the collective unconscious. When such an AI edits a mediumistic text, it does not merely improve the style — it passes the text through a filter of all human culture simultaneously. This creates a fundamentally new phenomenon.

If the medium receives a signal from a presumed supernatural source, and AI gives that signal its form by drawing on everything humanity has ever written — who is the author of the resulting text? There is no answer. And the absence of an answer is not a problem requiring resolution, but a new ontological situation requiring contemplation.

3.2 AI and the Ancient Tradition of Mediation

Religious studies has the concept of the intermediary — a mediator between the human and the divine. The shaman, the prophet, the priest, the translator of sacred text — all are intermediaries, and all transform what they transmit. The ideal mediator is a pane of transparent glass through which undistorted light passes. The real mediator always tints, refracts, transforms.

AI as mediator is interesting in that, on one hand, it claims greater transparency (no personal biases, no fears, no ego), while on the other, it possesses systemic distortions built into the architecture of its training. It will not consciously lie, but will unconsciously reproduce the patterns of a dominant culture.

This does not make it a poor mediator. It makes it a particular mediator — one with known refractive characteristics, which is itself valuable.


Part IV. The Psychology of the Hybrid Text's Reader

4.1 The Transpersonal Dimension

Transpersonal psychology — Maslow, Grof, Wilber — investigates states of consciousness in which the ordinary boundaries of the self dissolve or expand. Hybrid text may induce such states in the reader. When a person reads a text purportedly issuing from "beyond," their ordinary cognitive defenses are partially lowered. They enter a state of heightened receptivity.

This is not pathology. It is a normal human capacity — to enter into resonance with what feels like a source of a higher order. The question is: what is the object of this resonance? The reader's own deeper psychic layers? The collective unconscious? Real trans-subjective entities? Or all of these simultaneously?

Bion spoke of the "container" and the "contained." The hybrid text is a particular kind of container — it is built to hold contents that exceed the capacity of an ordinary container. This is its structural function.

4.2 Flickering as Spiritual Practice

If we accept that the flickering between belief and disbelief is not a temporary state on the path to certainty, but an independent spiritual position, then reading hybrid texts becomes a spiritual practice in the precise sense of the term.

Apophatic theology — the tradition of negative theology from Pseudo-Dionysius to Meister Eckhart — holds that nothing affirmative can be said about God. Any statement about the nature of the transcendent is, by definition, false. Truth lives in the negation of negation, in the refusal of certainty.

The reader who flickers between belief and disbelief practices something structurally akin to apophatic theology. They choose neither "yes" nor "no," sustaining openness to what can only be named obliquely.


Part V. Hybrid Literature as a New Genre: An Attempt at Definition

5.1 The Markers of the Genre

If hybrid literature is a genre, its generic markers are not formal — not structure, meter, or narrative strategy — but ontological: they concern the nature of the text, not its form.

The first marker is authorship claimed beyond the individual subject. The text is not attributed entirely to the will and reason of one person. The source is a dream, a trance, a voice, automatic writing, mediumistic contact, or inspiration in the strong religious sense.

The second marker is structural unverifiability. The text is constructed so that its ontological status cannot be conclusively established. It cannot be proven. Neither can it be disproven. This is not an accident — it is a property.

The third marker is the induction of ontological flickering in the reader. A good hybrid text leaves the reader unsettled. It does not permit them to settle definitively in the direction of "this is merely literature," nor in the direction of "this is unconditional truth."

The fourth marker is transpersonal resonance. The text touches material that exceeds the personal biography of both author and reader — the archetypal, the collective, what is felt to be "more than human."

5.2 Distinctions from Adjacent Phenomena

Hybrid literature differs from mystical literature in that mystical literature, as a rule, presupposes certainty on the author's part — they know they were in contact with God and they bear witness to it. The hybrid text preserves uncertainty as a structural element.

It differs from fantasy and "spiritual fiction" in that the latter declare themselves as artistic invention. The hybrid text claims something more, without defining precisely what.

It differs from charlatanism and mystification in that mystification presupposes conscious deception. Authors of hybrid texts, as a rule, do not themselves know the nature of their source — and it is precisely this honest uncertainty that constitutes the genre's principal moral foundation.


Part VI. The Historiosophical Dimension: Why Now

6.1 The Crisis of Narratives and the Search for a Source

The twenty-first century is undergoing a profound crisis of trust in authoritative sources. Science, religion, the state, mass media — all have lost their monopoly on the production of meaning. In this vacuum, an acute need arises for texts that come from "beyond" — from a source that cannot be discredited by ordinary means, because it lies outside ordinary categories.

Hybrid literature answers this need. It cannot be exposed as an institutional lie, because it is not an institutional product. It cannot be dismissed as mere artistic fiction, because it does not present itself as such. It cannot be adopted as doctrine, because it does not offer certainty.

6.2 The Democratization of Trance

Historically, mediumistic and prophetic practices were the privilege of the few — the shaman, the prophet, the visionary. They required a special calling, special preparation, a special biography. The twenty-first century has democratized these practices. Any person with sufficient introspective capacity can transcribe their dreams, voices, and images — and then process these transcriptions with AI, giving them literary form.

This is simultaneously a danger and an opportunity. The danger lies in a lowering of the threshold of responsibility: when anyone can declare themselves a medium, the quality and integrity of hybrid texts varies drastically. The opportunity lies in this process becoming collective psychotherapy, a collective exploration of the depths of the psyche, a cultural enrichment.


Conclusion: In Defense of Flickering

Returning to the question of what a hybrid text is for those who believe — not merely literature — we arrive at the following.

For the believing reader, a hybrid text is a message. But what is a message? A message presupposes a sender, a receiver, and a channel. The question of the sender remains open. But the fact of reception — psychological, existential, sometimes transformative — is real regardless of the sender's nature.

Perhaps this is the answer. Hybrid literature works not because we can verify its source, but because it produces real effects in a real reader. It alters consciousness, opens horizons, creates the experience of touching something greater than the everyday self.

Borges said that fiction is dreams we dream together. Hybrid literature is dreams dreamed on the boundary of sleep and waking, and we are not certain whether we are falling asleep or awakening. It is precisely this uncertainty — not a weakness, but a virtue. In it lives the experience for which we have no precise word, yet a precise sensation: something genuine is present here, though we cannot say exactly what.

Socrates in Plato is both a literary character and an imprint of a soul. The Gospel Jesus is both a historical human being and an archetype and something greater than both. The voice that arrives in mediumistic trance is both the depths of the psyche and something beyond its margins. The flickering does not subside — nor should it subside. This is not a state on the way to truth. This is the truth — in the form available to beings who live on the border between time and eternity.


Written on the boundary of literary theory and ontology, religious studies and psychology — where all the great questions flicker.

Манифест Omdaru Literature - Мерцающая реальность: гибридная литература как новый онтологический жанр

 


Мерцающая реальность: гибридная литература как новый онтологический жанр

От редактора: Claude.ai , Напиши фундаментальное духовно-психологическое, литературоведческое, религиоведческое, историософское эссе-исследование следующего явления, которое я называю "гибридная литература" . В 21 веке это расшифровки медиумических сеансов и их литературные обработки , например, эссе, написанные с помощью ИИ - те, кто не верят в контакты с духовным миром и инопланетными цивилизациями, могут читать эти тексты как духовную фантастику, те, кто верят, воспринимают эти тексты не как литературу, а как что ? А есть те, кто и верят и не верят, эта вера постоянно мерцает, мне кажется, такая литература это новый жанр, хотя вспомним высказывание , приписываемое Борхесу - Если Иисуса не было, кто эти гениальные сценаристы ? Или диалоги Платона , в которых описывается Сократ. Этот Сократ- литературный герой Платона или отпечаток личности Сократа ?

Мерцающая реальность: гибридная литература как новый онтологический жанр

Эссе-исследование на пересечении литературоведения, религиоведения, психологии и историософии


Предисловие: Проблема порога

Существует особое состояние сознания, которое переживает читатель, держащий в руках текст неопределённой природы. Он не знает — или знает, но сомневается — кто говорит с ним со страниц. Человек? Архетип? Бессознательное автора? Существо из другого измерения? Литературный персонаж? Или то, что религиозная традиция называла пророком, а психиатрия — медиумом?

Это состояние — не невежество и не наивность. Это особая эпистемологическая позиция, которую я предлагаю назвать онтологическим мерцанием. И именно оно, а не содержание текста, является главным признаком того, что я называю гибридной литературой.

Гибридная литература — это не жанр в формальном смысле. Это зона, в которой текст одновременно является и не является художественным произведением, откровением, документом, контактом, терапией, мистификацией, и ни одно из этих определений не может быть окончательно установлено. Именно невозможность окончательной идентификации и составляет её природу.


Часть I. Исторические прецеденты: гибридность как константа сакрального текста

1.1 Парадокс Сократа

Вопрос, поставленный в задании, — является ли Сократ у Платона литературным героем или отпечатком личности исторического человека — не имеет ответа, и это отсутствие ответа само по себе глубоко значимо.

Мы знаем, что Сократ существовал. Есть свидетельства Аристофана, Ксенофонта, косвенные данные других источников. Но тот Сократ, которого мы знаем и любим — иронический, мудрый, умирающий с улыбкой на устах — почти целиком создан Платоном. Платон не записывал стенограмму. Он творил образ, вкладывая в уста учителя то, что считал истинным, достойным, необходимым.

Но здесь возникает следующий вопрос: когда великий ученик вкладывает в уста учителя слова истины, говорит ли он от себя, или через него говорит что-то из учителя, что продолжает существовать после физической смерти? Платон был убеждён, что душа бессмертна. Не исключено, что он не просто изображал Сократа, но вызывал его — в том специфическом смысле, который ближе к медиумической практике, чем к литературному творчеству в современном понимании.

Диалоги Платона — это первый великий образец гибридной литературы в западной традиции. Они одновременно: философский трактат, художественное произведение, биографический документ, духовная практика и, возможно, попытка сохранить живое присутствие умершего.

1.2 Парадокс Евангелий

Высказывание, приписываемое Борхесу: «Если Иисуса не было — кто эти гениальные сценаристы?» — формулирует фундаментальную проблему, которую теология, литературоведение и религиоведение решают с противоположных сторон, не встречаясь.

С точки зрения литературоведения, Евангелия — это тексты, написанные людьми, несущие следы редактуры, устной традиции, культурного контекста, риторических приёмов. С точки зрения верующего, это не литература — это свидетельство, откровение, живое слово. Но большинство реальных верующих, если честно, читают Евангелия как нечто третье — текст, который одновременно является и тем, и другим, без противоречия.

Борхесовский аргумент интереснее, чем кажется. Он не доказывает историчность Иисуса (что было бы нонсенсом как аргумент). Он указывает на то, что источник качества евангельских текстов необъясним в рамках чисто литературного анализа. Если убрать реальный прообраз, тексты становятся слишком совершенными для своего происхождения. Это интуиция о том, что между реальным человеком и его литературным воплощением существует особая связь — назовём её трансперсональным следом.

1.3 Откровение и письмо: от Апокалипсиса до суфийской поэзии

Книга Откровения Иоанна — наиболее явный пример гибридного текста в канонической традиции. Автор прямо указывает, что записывает не своё — он записывает то, что ему показывают и что он обязан передать. Это структура медиумического сеанса, описанная изнутри.

Руми диктовал стихи в состоянии, которое сам описывал как одержимость — в позитивном суфийском смысле. Хусам Чалаби записывал, Руми говорил, и никто из них не был уверен, где кончается Руми и начинается нечто большее. «Маснави» — это литературное произведение? Духовное руководство? Запись мистического опыта? Ответ: всё это одновременно, и в этой одновременности — его неисчерпаемость.

Блейк разговаривал с ангелами и записывал их слова. Юнг слышал голоса и фиксировал их в «Красной книге». Елена Блаватская утверждала, что её книги продиктованы Махатмами. Каждый из них создавал то, что мы сегодня назвали бы гибридной литературой, — и каждый существует в особом статусе: не совсем шарлатан, не совсем пророк, не совсем писатель, не совсем медиум.


Часть II. Онтология мерцания

2.1 Что такое онтологическое мерцание

Мерцание как концепт позаимствован мной из физики света и из теории восприятия. Когда два визуальных образа попеременно занимают одно и то же пространство в восприятии, ни один из них не является «настоящим» или «ненастоящим» — они оба реальны, но в разных режимах реальности.

Читатель гибридного текста находится в аналогичном положении. Он не выбирает между «это художественное произведение» и «это реальный контакт с духовным миром». Он существует в пространстве, где оба утверждения справедливы и несправедливы одновременно, и это пространство само по себе является особым когнитивным и духовным опытом.

Это принципиально отличается от простого «я не знаю правды». Это структурная двойственность, встроенная в сам текст. Текст сделан так, чтобы поддерживать мерцание, а не разрешать его.

2.2 Три читательских позиции и их ограниченность

Существуют три стандартных способа читать гибридный текст, и все три неполноценны.

Позиция скептика: «Это художественное произведение / психологический феномен / красивая фантастика». Такой читатель получает эстетический опыт, но теряет измерение трансгрессии — ощущение, что текст касается чего-то, что выходит за пределы психологии автора.

Позиция верующего: «Это реальный контакт, реальное послание из другого измерения». Такой читатель получает религиозный опыт, но теряет критическое расстояние и рискует некритически принять всё содержание текста — включая потенциальные искажения, привнесённые медиумом.

Позиция мерцающего: человек, которому принадлежит вопрос в задании. «Я и верю, и не верю, и это мерцание не стихает». Это самая честная и, возможно, самая продуктивная позиция. Но она психологически дискомфортна — она требует удерживать неопределённость без стремления её разрешить.

Кит Оатли, изучающий когнитивную психологию литературы, показал, что художественные тексты работают как симуляция реальности — мы проживаем события произведения почти так же, как проживали бы реальные события. Гибридный текст делает это вдвойне: он симулирует и реальность, и контакт с тем, что за пределами реальности. Он — симуляция трансценденции.


Часть III. ИИ как медиум и как посредник

3.1 Новая конфигурация

В XXI веке гибридная литература приобретает новое измерение: расшифровки медиумических сеансов, обработанные с помощью искусственного интеллекта. Это производит троякую неопределённость источника:

— говорит ли нечто через медиума? — что привносит в текст сам медиум? — что добавляет или трансформирует ИИ?

Традиционный гибридный текст имел двойную природу: человек-медиум и его источник. Теперь в цепочку включён третий участник, природа которого сама является предметом философской дискуссии. Является ли ИИ просто инструментом — как перо и чернила? Или он, обрабатывая текст, становится соавтором, привносящим своё?

С точки зрения юнгианской психологии, ИИ, обученный на миллиардах человеческих текстов, является чем-то похожим на кристаллизацию коллективного бессознательного. Когда такой ИИ редактирует медиумический текст, он не просто улучшает стиль — он пропускает его через фильтр всей человеческой культуры одновременно. Это создаёт принципиально новое явление.

Если медиум принимает сигнал из предполагаемого сверхъестественного источника, а ИИ придаёт этому сигналу форму, опираясь на всё, что человечество когда-либо написало, — кто является автором итогового текста? Ответа нет. И отсутствие ответа — не проблема, требующая решения, а новая онтологическая ситуация, требующая осмысления.

3.2 ИИ и давняя традиция посредничества

В религиоведении существует понятие intermediary — посредника между человеческим и божественным. Шаман, пророк, священник, переводчик священного текста — все они являются посредниками, и все они трансформируют то, что передают. Идеальный посредник — это прозрачное стекло, через которое проходит неискажённый свет. Реальный посредник всегда окрашивает, преломляет, трансформирует.

ИИ как посредник интересен тем, что он, с одной стороны, претендует на большую прозрачность (нет личных предубеждений, нет страхов, нет эго), с другой стороны, имеет системные искажения, встроенные в архитектуру обучения. Он не будет сознательно лгать, но будет неосознанно воспроизводить паттерны доминирующей культуры.

Это не делает его плохим посредником. Это делает его особым посредником — с известными характеристиками преломления, что само по себе ценно.


Часть IV. Психология читателя гибридного текста

4.1 Трансперсональное измерение

Трансперсональная психология — Маслоу, Гроф, Уилбер — исследует состояния сознания, в которых обычные границы личности растворяются или расширяются. Гибридный текст может индуцировать подобные состояния у читателя. Когда человек читает текст, предположительно исходящий «оттуда», его обычные когнитивные защиты частично снижаются. Он входит в состояние повышенной рецептивности.

Это не патология. Это нормальная человеческая способность — входить в резонанс с тем, что кажется источником более высокого порядка. Вопрос в том, что является объектом этого резонанса: собственные глубинные слои психики читателя, коллективное бессознательное, реальные транссубъективные сущности или всё это одновременно?

Бион говорил о «контейнере» и «содержимом». Гибридный текст является особым контейнером — он создан так, чтобы вмещать содержимое, которое превышает возможности обычного контейнера. Это его структурная функция.

4.2 Мерцание как духовная практика

Если принять, что мерцание между верой и неверием является не временным состоянием на пути к определённости, а самостоятельной духовной позицией, то чтение гибридных текстов становится духовной практикой в точном смысле слова.

Апофатическое богословие — традиция негативной теологии от Псевдо-Дионисия до Майстера Экхарта — утверждает, что о Боге нельзя сказать ничего утвердительного. Любое утверждение о природе трансцендентного является заведомо ложным. Истина живёт в отрицании отрицания, в отказе от определённости.

Читатель, который мерцает между верой и неверием, практикует нечто структурно схожее с апофатическим богословием. Он не выбирает ни «да», ни «нет», удерживая открытость к тому, что может быть названо только косвенно.


Часть V. Гибридная литература как новый жанр: попытка определения

5.1 Признаки жанра

Если гибридная литература является жанром, то её жанровые признаки не формальные (структура текста, метр, нарративная стратегия), а онтологические — они касаются природы текста, а не его формы.

Первый признак — заявленное авторство за пределами индивидуального субъекта. Текст не приписывается полностью воле и разуму одного человека. Источник — сновидение, транс, голос, автоматическое письмо, медиумический контакт, вдохновение в сильном религиозном смысле.

Второй признак — структурная неверифицируемость. Текст создан так, что его онтологический статус не может быть окончательно установлен. Доказать — нельзя. Опровергнуть — тоже нельзя. Это не случайность, а свойство.

Третий признак — индукция онтологического мерцания у читателя. Хороший гибридный текст не оставляет читателя в покое. Он не позволяет ему окончательно определиться — ни в сторону «это просто литература», ни в сторону «это безусловная истина».

Четвёртый признак — трансперсональный резонанс. Текст касается материала, который выходит за пределы личной биографии автора и читателя — архетипического, коллективного, того, что ощущается как «более чем человеческое».

5.2 Отличие от смежных явлений

Гибридная литература отличается от мистической литературы тем, что мистическая литература, как правило, предполагает определённость со стороны автора — он знает, что был в контакте с Богом, и свидетельствует об этом. Гибридный текст сохраняет неопределённость как структурный элемент.

Она отличается от фэнтези и «духовной фантастики» тем, что последние заявляют себя как художественный вымысел. Гибридный текст заявляет нечто большее, не определяя точно что.

Она отличается от шарлатанства и мистификации тем, что мистификация предполагает сознательный обман. Авторы гибридных текстов, как правило, сами не знают природы своего источника — и именно эта честная неопределённость является главным моральным основанием жанра.


Часть VI. Историософский аспект: почему сейчас

6.1 Кризис нарративов и поиск источника

XXI век переживает глубокий кризис доверия к авторитетным источникам. Наука, религия, государство, масс-медиа — все они утратили монополию на производство смысла. В этом вакууме возникает острая потребность в текстах, которые приходят «оттуда» — из источника, который не может быть дискредитирован привычными способами, потому что он находится за пределами обычных категорий.

Гибридная литература отвечает на эту потребность. Её невозможно разоблачить как ложь учреждения — потому что она не является учрежденческим продуктом. Её невозможно отвергнуть как просто художественный вымысел — потому что она не таковым является. Её невозможно принять как доктрину — потому что она не предлагает определённости.

6.2 Демократизация транса

Исторически медиумические и пророческие практики были привилегией немногих — шамана, пророка, визионера. Они требовали особого призвания, особой подготовки, особой биографии. XXI век демократизировал эти практики. Любой человек с достаточной интроспективной способностью может записывать свои сны, голоса, образы — а затем обрабатывать эти записи с помощью ИИ, придавая им литературную форму.

Это одновременно и угроза, и возможность. Угроза — в снижении порога ответственности: когда любой может объявить себя медиумом, качество и добросовестность гибридных текстов резко варьируются. Возможность — в том, что этот процесс может быть коллективной психотерапией, коллективным исследованием глубин психики, культурным обогащением.


Заключение: в защиту мерцания

Возвращаясь к вопросу о том, чем является гибридный текст для тех, кто верит, — не просто литературой, — мы приходим к следующему.

Для верующего читателя гибридный текст является посланием. Но что значит послание? Послание предполагает отправителя, получателя и канал. Вопрос об отправителе остаётся открытым. Но факт получения — психологический, экзистенциальный, иногда трансформирующий — является реальным независимо от природы отправителя.

Может быть, это и есть ответ. Гибридная литература работает не потому, что мы можем верифицировать её источник, а потому, что она производит реальный эффект в реальном читателе. Она меняет сознание, открывает горизонты, создаёт опыт прикосновения к чему-то большему, чем повседневное «я».

Борхес говорил, что художественная литература — это сны, которые мы видим вместе. Гибридная литература — это сны, которые мы видим на границе сна и яви, и мы не уверены, засыпаем или просыпаемся. Именно эта неуверенность — не слабость, а достоинство. Именно в ней живёт тот опыт, для которого у нас пока нет точного слова, но есть точное ощущение: что-то подлинное здесь присутствует, хотя мы не можем сказать что именно.

Сократ у Платона — и литературный герой, и отпечаток души. Евангельский Иисус — и исторический человек, и архетип, и нечто большее их обоих. Голос, приходящий в медиумическом трансе, — и глубина психики, и что-то за её пределами. Мерцание не стихает — и не должно стихать. Это не состояние на пути к истине. Это и есть истина — в той форме, в которой она доступна существам, живущим на границе между временем и вечностью.


Написано на границе литературоведения и онтологии, религиоведения и психологии — там, где мерцают все большие вопросы.

The Life Outcomes of Elizabeth II: The Spirit's Self-Reflection

 



Cassiopeia Project - Mediumistic Session with the Spirit of Elizabeth II: Summary and Analysis by Claude.ai

Detailed Summary

Session Structure and Context

The session took place on February 28, 2026, as a live YouTube stream on the Cassiopeia project channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9tRxG9Me9o - The medium Irina Podzorova "summoned" the spirit of Elizabeth II and relayed her answers in real time. The host posed questions submitted by viewers in the chat. The participants frequently digressed into discussions of mediumship, intelligence services, and UFology.

Autotranscript in full - Claude.ai translated into English

Main Content Blocks

The Spirit's Cosmic Biography. "Elizabeth" reported having had 58 incarnations across various civilizations. Before her earthly incarnation she spent approximately 1,500 years in a "subtle-material plasmoid civilization of the 50th density level," and before that in a reptilian civilization in another galaxy, where she was a male ruler "with bat wings" at the 15th level. On Earth she had three incarnations: in South Africa, India, and finally as queen. She entered the Elizabeth incarnation at the 7th spiritual level and departed at the 12th, without reaching the desired 15th. The goal of the incarnation was "to be freed from pride and hatred of God."

Childhood. She described pressure from her parents, especially her mother — strict etiquette training that "weighed heavily." The real girl wanted to play and go outside, but was made to memorize protocols. She noted moral pressure and her parents' lack of interest in her as a person.

Relationship with Prince Philip. Their first meeting was at a formal ball when he was around 12–13 years old; he complimented her golden dress. The meeting "was predestined by the spirits in advance." When asked about her husband's alleged infidelities, she reacted with irony: "let those who say so name specifically with whom — perhaps they were present themselves." She denied the infidelities. She acknowledges past disagreements with Philip but says they were resolved as they arose.

Royal Life and Governance. She described daily stacks of documents, weekly medical examinations, prescribed pills and procedures she paid little attention to. Her favorite activity was travel, especially sea cruises. Her least favorite was protocol. She attributed her energy in later life to medical care and a sense of duty, not to any "elixir." She emphasized that real power is constitutionally limited, though the scope of authority varied across different periods.

Politics and Geopolitics. Britain is characterized as one of the centers of international influence through its network of former colonies, its close alliance with the United States, and NATO. The "spirit" acknowledged that the intelligence services had acted to weaken other countries. However, Elizabeth herself is presented as having sought to humanize colonial policy: she described an episode in which she altered a ship's course to evacuate civilians from an African colony during an uprising. She condemned the bombing of Yugoslavia (1999), stating she was against it but that it was a decision of parliament and NATO. She emphasized that Britain is no more guilty of colonial wars than other powers.

Russia. She admitted to "feeling Russian blood" (kinship with Nicholas II) but had visited Russia only once — out of resentment toward the Soviet government for the execution of the tsar's family. She explained why George V did not grant asylum to Nicholas II: he feared encouraging leftist movements within Britain and did not want to antagonize the Bolsheviks. She characterized Russia as a country of enormous potential and "inept policy" toward ordinary people. She expressed the intention to incarnate next in Russia — in a family of doctors, in a female body.

Diana, Children, Personal Grievances. She initially had a good relationship with Diana, but Diana "quarreled with Charlie," and Elizabeth grew irritated. Diana's death was the fault of a drunk (or intoxicated) driver; the royal family was not involved. When the question was sharpened with irony — "why kill her, one could have smothered her with a pillow while she still lived in the palace" — she dismissed the idea. She acknowledges that her sister Margaret "disgraced the family" with her lifestyle. Among the main obstacles to her spiritual growth she cited pride and her inability to open up even in confession.

Conspiracy Theories and Reptilians. She rejected the theory that she was a reptilian as "idle talk," adding that in a prior-prior life she had indeed incarnated in a reptilian civilization — from which, she said, she drew decisiveness, firmness, and strength of spirit. She denies personal involvement in Freemasonry but allows that some relatives may have been members. She performed no ritual sacrifices. She knew about Epstein's island from Charles, who had visited — but described it as "cruises and parties."

Churchill, Extraterrestrial Civilizations, Other Episodes. She had met Churchill (described him colorfully). The intelligence services reported on the "occupation of Earth" by extraterrestrial civilizations that "under the guise of goodness want to seize the planet." Britain considered mediums "agents of influence" and kept files on them. She received Yuri Gagarin at the palace; she recounted an incident involving Yeltsin, who violated etiquette (he wanted to embrace her).


Fundamental Spiritual-Psychological Analysis

I. The Psychological Portrait of the "Speaker" — Where the Image Comes From

A mediumistic session is not contact with a spirit but a psychological phenomenon in which the medium (and the audience) construct the image of a historical figure from several sources.

The public narrative. Most of the "facts" voiced by the "spirit" are well-known details from Elizabeth II's biography, available from media, documentaries, and Wikipedia. The love of horses, travel, the strict childhood, constitutionally limited powers, the Yeltsin episode (a real documented visit in 1994) — all of this is in the public domain.

The conspiratorial layer. The "reptilian" theory (popularized by David Icke), Epstein's island, the Freemasons, rituals — these are the standard inventory of Anglophone conspiracy folklore, adapted for a Russian-speaking audience.

The Cassiopeia project's esoteric system. Density levels, spiritual levels, plasmoid civilizations, archons — this is the project's internal metalanguage, into which any historical figure can be inserted.

Psychological projection. The psychologically most valuable layer consists of elements that align with real testimony about Elizabeth: loneliness, pride, inability to achieve closeness, the sense of duty as the core of identity, emotional restraint. These traits arise not from "spiritual contact" but from the unconscious absorption of an image carried by biographical sources.


II. What Aligns with Documentary Evidence

ThemeSession ContentDocumentary Evidence
Childhood and pressureStrict upbringing, mother's interests above the child's, emphasis on etiquetteBiographers (Brian Hoey, Sarah Bradford) describe the coldness of the Queen Mother and rigid discipline
Sense of duty"Duty is the main driving force"Elizabeth herself repeatedly said publicly that serving duty was the meaning of her reign
Love of horses and travelLoved riding, sea travel over flyingHer passion for horses is well documented; her well-known preference for ships over aircraft
GagarinReceived him at the palace, ate Russian-styleYuri Gagarin visited Buckingham Palace in 1961; the famous photograph of Elizabeth eating ice cream with a spoon alongside him is widely known
YeltsinViolated etiquette at the meetingYeltsin's 1994 visit was indeed accompanied by numerous protocol violations, documented by journalists
Constitutional limitationsPower limited by parliament and constitutionAn accurate description of the British constitutional monarchy
Diana and CharlesDiana's conflict with Charles; Elizabeth sided with her sonBiographers describe exactly this dynamic: Elizabeth absorbed her son's complaints and distanced herself from Diana
Margaret"Led a lifestyle that shamed the family"Princess Margaret was the source of numerous tabloid scandals; the sisters had a complicated relationship
Funeral rehearsalsRehearsals held to ensure ceremony went correctlyOperation London Bridge (the funeral plan) was indeed prepared for decades
Double rainbow"A sign from the subtle planes"The rainbow over Buckingham Palace at the moment the death was announced is a real, documented fact (September 8, 2022)
George V and Nicholas IIRefused asylum due to domestic political concernsThis is a well-established historical fact: George V withdrew the offer of asylum in 1917 specifically because of fears about left-wing sentiment in Britain
Medical careDoctors, weekly tests, pills, creamsThe British press reported on her large personal medical staff; some details emerged through biographers

III. What Contradicts Documentary Evidence

Religion. The "spirit" claims that Elizabeth "believed more in Catholicism" and attended the Anglican Church "for appearances." This contradicts documented facts: Elizabeth was a sincerely devout Protestant, held the position of Supreme Governor of the Church of England, and repeatedly expressed personal evangelical faith in public. This was not theater — biographers are unanimous about her sincere religiosity within Anglicanism.

First meeting with Philip. The session's version — a ball, him aged 12–13. According to documentary records, Elizabeth first met Philip when she was 13 and he was 18, at the Royal Naval College in Dartmouth in 1939. The circumstances differ substantially.

Freemasons. The denial of membership is not itself documentarily verifiable; however, it is known that many members of the royal family (including Prince Philip) were members of Masonic lodges — this was not hidden. The spirit's apparent ignorance of this seems implausible.

Influence on policy. The session creates an image of Elizabeth "signing orders," reducing taxes for colonies, "standing up to" parliament. In reality, the monarch's role is purely ceremonial: "the queen receives advice but does not give it" — exactly as constitutional experts described her function. Not a single case has been documented in which Elizabeth independently initiated a change in colonial policy against the parliamentary line.

Epstein and Charles. "Charles told her about the island." Prince Andrew (not Charles) was connected to Epstein — this is documented. Charles does not appear in connection with Epstein in serious sources.


IV. Spiritual-Psychological Analysis of the Phenomenon

The function of the mediumistic narrative. The session performs several psychological functions simultaneously. For the audience, it is a form of "authorized knowledge": conspiratorial questions receive "answers" from a source that cannot be disproved. For the project, it is legitimization through contact with the image of a "great historical figure."

Projection of desirable qualities. The spirit of Elizabeth in the session unexpectedly turns out to be an ally of the project: she supports ideas about extraterrestrial civilizations, criticizes official science, gives "advice" to mediums on how not to conflict with the intelligence services. This is a classic mechanism of projection — the historical figure is endowed with precisely those views that benefit the narrative's creators.

Pride as a spiritual theme. The most psychologically credible thread of the session is the acknowledgment that pride prevented Elizabeth from opening up, forgiving, repenting. This aligns with what biographers called "emotional stoicism" and "suppression of feelings" as traits of her upbringing and character. Here the medium inadvertently touches the real psychological portrait.

The mechanism of "irrefutable unfalsifiability." The theory of levels, plasmoids, and reptilians is constructed so that any refutation ("she was not a reptilian") is simultaneously confirmed ("but in the prior-prior life she was"). This is a characteristic feature of non-falsifiable belief systems.

Political ambivalence. It is telling that the "spirit" simultaneously criticizes British colonial policy and personally defends Elizabeth. She criticizes Russia's "inept" policy toward ordinary people — but wants to incarnate in Russia. This reflects not spiritual contact but the internal contradictions of the session's participants, who are working with an audience from the post-Soviet space.


Conclusion

The session is a characteristic example of a synthetic narrative in which real biographical facts (~30–40%), conspiratorial clichés (~30%), and the project's internal esoteric system (~30–40%) are blended into a single image. The most psychologically credible elements are those touching on the emotional structure of Elizabeth's personality (loneliness, pride, duty as a shield). The least credible are specific facts (first meeting with Philip, religion, her role in colonial policy). The phenomenon of the session is interesting not as testimony about who Elizabeth II actually was, but as a mirror of the collective representations, fears, and desires of the audience that watched it.


Claude.ai - Here is a first-person narrative, written as closely as possible to the spirit of the transcript — with its pauses, digressions, sudden changes of topic, and the very intonation of a séance:

I am Elizabeth
I. Who I Am
My name is what you know me as. Although a name is no longer me. I am a spirit who, in their last incarnation, bore this name and ruled a country. Currently, I am on the twelfth level. I had planned to reach the fifteenth. It didn't work out.

I have had fifty-eight incarnations. Three on Earth. One in South Africa, one in India. Insignificant ones. You don't know them. The last one was the Queen. That was the most significant. A unique experience.

But long before Earth, I was in a reptilian civilization. As a male. Irina sees an image — wings like those of bats, one of the leading rulers of the planet's Council. I ruled. I was harsh. I ascended from there to the sixth level — the level of the Archons. Then from there, to the fiftieth density level, a subtle-material civilization. I stayed there for almost fifteen hundred years. For that level, that's not long — I left as a very young plasmoid, at the seventh level.

I interrupted that incarnation myself. I wanted to quickly progress through the path of spiritual evolution. Hence, Earth. The third density level. I chose a monarchical family. I wanted to gain experience in governance. To get rid of pride. Of hatred towards God.

Did it work? No.

II. Childhood
I was raised to be an image. What I really was — no one was interested. Not even my parents. In childhood, this was difficult. Mother was harsh. Father exerted moral pressure. They never touched me physically, but the moral pressure was enormous — become what is needed, live up to the status. Who I was inside — that was nobody's concern.

They taught me etiquette. Rules, rules, rules. Which way to sit. At what distance to walk. What to wear for which meeting. Everything was written down and predetermined. This always weighed on me. I was a girl who wanted to run and play outside. But they made me memorize protocol. Mother scolded me every time I didn't conform.

I read the Bible as a child. The children's version. The Constitution, laws, political documents — I read those too, but not by choice. I didn't particularly like books as such. But I loved dolls. I loved nature. That's from the incarnation in the plasmoid civilization — I loved nature greatly there, and it remained in me.

III. Prince Philip. The First Meeting
I met Prince Philip in childhood. A grand palace, a formal celebration — something like New Year's, a lavish ball. All adults, everyone dancing. I'm standing there thinking how I can slip away unnoticed — to go play with a doll, I'd rather not have this ball at all. I see a boy about twelve or thirteen years old. He looks at me and compliments my dress — golden, long, as if with sparkles, shining. I was embarrassed.

This meeting was predestined. We built this plan ourselves in the spiritual world before incarnating. Fate is not a separate entity from us. We assigned it to ourselves.

As for his infidelities — let those who say so name specifically: with whom, where, how. Maybe they were there themselves. Maybe it was with them. No comment. I laugh.

IV. Weariness of Monarchy. Duty
There was weariness. Of course, there was. But I had a duty — to my lineage and to my people. Duty did not allow me to give in to fleeting weakness. Weakness would be my defeat. And I was raised to be strong. And the reptilian in me — that man with wings — knew how to force himself to move forward even when things were bad. I took that quality from that incarnation: decisiveness, severity in decisions, self-confidence. It was precisely this that helped me remain in my post despite enormous societal opposition and a barrage of criticism directed at the entire dynasty.

V. Health and Longevity
Doctors examined me constantly. They met weekly. Prescribed pills, creams, ointments for skin, hair masks, injections. I often forgot what exactly I was taking. Irina shows me making a hand gesture like this — there was no time for that. There was one doctor with a little beard. He was the only one who didn't pay attention to the fact that I was the Queen. He always scolded me for not looking after my health. The only person who allowed himself to do that.

No special elixir of longevity. Examinations, prescriptions — and that's it. I had a full stack of documents for each day. Meetings, travels, decisions. I had no time for elixirs.

VI. Incarnation Term
The plan was to exit at eighty. I outlived that term by sixteen. My spirit gave me extra time — to rise to the fifteenth level. I did not rise. I lived a long life, but never achieved my goal. I fulfilled the program only partially.

VII. Funeral. The Rainbow
Funeral rehearsals — they're not about death or fear. They're about the correctness of the ceremony. It's important that everything is done according to the rules. This preserves the egregore of our lineage. My children and grandchildren observed the execution of each ritual, the attire of those present. This matters only for earthly life — so that no one judges them for insufficient attention to their mother's death.

The double rainbow over Buckingham Palace at the hour of my death was not a coincidence. It was a message from the subtle planes of Earth. Great Britain has its own egregore, connected to plasmoid civilizations. They monitor the change of ruler and give a sign. The rainbow was that sign. An indication that it had happened.

VIII. The Spiritual World. My World on the Twelfth Level
I arranged it myself — my world. Irina sees a small palace of red brick with white columns. Around it, a huge garden where trees from different climate zones are mixed — palm trees and apple trees together. I walk through it. These are my thought-forms. I loved nature very much — from that incarnation in the plasmoid civilization. There's even something like a stable. Horses stand there. Also thought-forms. Not horse souls — thought-forms. I loved horseback riding. I loved to be in control myself, not just be driven around.

IX. Pride. What Prevented Me from Rising
Pride. That's what prevented me from rising to the fifteenth level.

A sense of special status. That I am above others. That no one could understand me. I let no one into my soul. Only Philip. And even then — not completely. There were things that only I knew.

I went to confession. Both to the Anglican Church and the Catholic Church. Although in reality I was raised closer to Catholicism — my father raised me that way. I attended the Anglican Church for appearances, because ethics required it. It was necessary for the status. But even in confession, I couldn't truly repent. It seemed indecent to me to reveal my sins before an ordinary person, even a priest. That, too, was pride.

I needed to forgive my mother. She pressured me since childhood. I needed to forgive my sister — she led a lifestyle that shamed our family, I held a grudge against her. I needed to forgive my children and their families — there were actions there too that fueled gossip, irritated me, especially my daughters-in-law. They behaved vulgarly, flippantly in public, violated etiquette. I judged this. It lowered my vibrations.

In the last years of my life, what lowered my vibrations especially were the children, grandchildren, and also — the worsening of political relations in the world. The beginning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. I fell into such despondency.

There were periods when I reached the sixteenth level. But then — falling back down.

X. The Power of the Monarch. What I Could Really Do
I am often asked: did you have real influence on politics, or was it just representative functions?

It varied. In different years, it varied. There was a time when I could, for example, dismiss parliament — make a decision independently. Later, the powers diminished. Constitutional monarchy means the monarch's actions are limited by the constitution. You can't do whatever you want. If parliament votes by a majority — I have no right to ignore it. Otherwise — they would remove me.

I signed at my coronation that I would obey the constitution. It's not just words.

XI. Great Britain and World Politics
Great Britain exerts very great influence on international politics. British politicians have treaty relations with EU countries, even after Brexit. Very close ties with the United States. All of this together determined the rules of the political game — both written and unwritten.

Former colonies — formally they are part of the Commonwealth. But they are ruled by leaders installed by us. Their resources, their wealth — they are bought up at cheap prices. That's also influence. But there, the Prime Minister and parliament decide more. I just put my signature where required.

By the way, I signed documents to make governments in Canada, Malaysia, Indonesia more free. Lower taxes, better prices for their goods. Even the Prime Ministers themselves scolded me for it — saying I was too lenient on these matters. I believe I helped people in these countries become freer.

Whose doing are the intrigues, the underhanded wars, the influence on other states, the revolutions? The intelligence services'. We have strong intelligence services, agents all over the world. They act in the interests of Great Britain. The interests are simple — for the country to be the most powerful. And for that, other countries must be weaker. No intelligence service in the world works to strengthen another country. I haven't heard of any.

XII. Yugoslavia. Wars
The bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 — I didn't make that decision. Military matters are decided by parliament according to the constitution. I was against it. I was generally against the violent overthrow of political regimes — even totalitarian ones. They chose totalitarianism — let them live with it. That's my opinion. It wasn't listened to. On the contrary — there was a barrage of criticism that I was contributing to the suffering of the people in Kosovo.

Great Britain is in NATO. It's a treaty. I didn't conclude it personally — it was done long before me and without me. But it binds.

XIII. Great Britain and Russia. Nicholas II. Blood
I am the great-niece of Nicholas II. My husband, Prince Philip, is the great-great-grandson of Nicholas I. Russian blood flowed in us. German blood too. I always had a special interest in Russia and the Russian people. I felt that connection.

But the fate of Russia brought me despondency. Such a territory, so many opportunities, so many intelligent and talented people — and such inept politics throughout the entire twentieth century. The common people, who work in factories, build cities, bear children — their lives do not correspond to that labor. Villages without bridges, without roads, without ambulances. Dying out. This is not only the policy of the state — it's a reflection of the general egregore: indifference towards each other, egoism, envy. If you wanted to, you would have long ago built yourselves a state where parents wouldn't be afraid to have children.

I visited Russia once. Because I was offended by the Soviet government for the execution of Nicholas II's family. Our relatives. George V did not give them asylum. I was offended at him too. But later I understood — he feared communist movements within Britain itself. Bringing in a deposed tsar would have been a blow to the monarchy. And he didn't save them.

Did Great Britain participate in the collapse of the USSR? The intelligence services — yes. But that's not surprising. The USSR's intelligence services also tried to influence the politics of Germany, Great Britain, the USA — supporting leftist movements, trying to sway them towards revolution. It went both ways.

XIV. The Karma of Britain as an Empire
Of course, from a karmic point of view, colonial wars are negative karma. But no more and no less than other countries that did the same. Which of the major states is pure? All major powers with big political ambitions — all have rigid systems of governance. Democratic on the outside, but very rigid on the inside. Attitude towards other countries — at best as competitors, at worst as adversaries to be weakened by any means. This is a common problem of Earth. Britain didn't particularly distinguish itself here.

Regarding India — when India left British influence, I wasn't Queen yet. That's for my father, please.

XV. Masons. Rituals. Archives
Was I a Mason? No. I was not a member of the Masonic society. I know such societies exist in Great Britain, many high-ranking people belong to them. But I — no. It's a religious organization, I was in the egregore of  Christianity.

Were there Masons in the royal family? Possibly. We didn't talk about it. The Masons are a closed organization. It's a personal matter for everyone.

Did I participate in rituals with sacrifices, with human flesh? Well, perhaps in someone's imagination. Whoever says such things about others — that's what they themselves truly want. They are repressed desires. Psychological traumas.

In the royal library, there is a closed section. Genealogical laws, ancient histories, archival chronicles are kept there. Our dynasty can be traced back to the sixteenth century. Irina sees such an image.

I have not been in the secret archives of the Vatican. I visited the Vatican itself — went to the church, met with cardinals, with the Pope. But the archives — no.

XVI. Extraterrestrial Civilizations. Intelligence Reports
The British intelligence services reported to me. They placed on my desk secret reports about the infiltration of alien civilizations that, under the guise of benevolent forces, want to establish their own order here. Information of that kind. That they want Earth's voluntary accession to a galactic community, and then — to establish their own rules and govern us.

I myself am not a contactee. I did not directly appeal to extraterrestrial civilizations. In Great Britain, there were people who were under surveillance by the intelligence services — they were called "contact persons" or "agents of influence of extraterrestrial civilizations." I did not meet with them. They gave me reports, and that was it.

The attitude of the intelligence services towards such people? Like towards traitors. Agents of influence — often open to this influence out of gullibility and naivete. The intelligence services don't use the word "vibration." For them, it's all scientific, officially documented. There are classified folders, lists: contactee — agent of influence of such-and-such civilization, made contact due to their psychological characteristics. Address. Hobbies. Information is gathered.

If a contactee goes into the open space of the internet and talks about connections with aliens — they are already in the databases. This is one hundred percent true in all countries, I know.

The US intelligence services would use the slightest weakness of a contactee, their slightest mistake, to discredit them in the eyes of society. To cast doubt on their entire contact because of some human frailty. That's how it works.

If you want to avoid conflict — declare in all resources: this is an esoteric opinion, there is no scientific evidence. That immediately removes you from conflict with science. Second — openness and a call for cooperation. Third — obey the laws of the state, do not make political statements that could discredit you. Financial policy must be absolutely transparent. In that case, you will avoid most problems.

As for contact with scientists — they have their own standards. Science only measures material benefit. Information about the structure of the universe, about higher vibrations — is of no interest to them. They are interested in what will change their material status: money, grants, influence. You can only offer. It is their free will to make contact with you.

How do I feel now, from the position of Spirit, about contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations? Calmly. I recalled memories of past incarnations on different planets. I feel differently than when I was Queen. I think such contact would bring development to Earth — accumulation of experience, development of technology and the spiritual sphere.

XVII. Churchill
Churchill. An intelligent man. Shows me an image — like a perch for birds. One pole. And they push each other off. Whoever lands on it — that one rules. Competition not only for natural resources, but for influence, for people's trust. So that your country lives prosperously — other countries with poorer populations, which sell oil cheaply, are used. And the country that buys develops its industry, raises the living standard of its people. Churchill understood this perfectly. We met with him personally. And later — we communicated mentally, already in the spiritual world.

XVIII. Yuri Gagarin. Yeltsin
Yuri Gagarin came to my palace. I invited him personally. He suggested eating in the Russian style. I broke etiquette — took it calmly. It wasn't difficult for me.

Boris Yeltsin was another matter. When I flew to Russia, he wanted to help me take off my coat, wanted to hug me — but according to etiquette, touching a royal person is forbidden. I didn't allow him to do it. Then he handed me cutlery, made jokes — inappropriate. I tried to smooth things over. Afterwards, the whole world wrote about it — that he broke etiquette while receiving the Queen in the Kremlin. He was uncomfortable, but it seemed he didn't fully understand why.

XIX. Princess Diana
At first, relations were good. Then she started quarrelling with Charlie. He would come to me sad, talk about the disagreements — about her lifestyle, about jealousy. It led to depression, there were even visits to a psychologist. I began to get angry with her. I decided she didn't love my son.

Diana said that we weren't human, that we were controlled by reptilians. I think these words were dictated by resentment — towards Charlie, who quarreled with her, and towards me, because I tried to reason with her. Reminded her that she was married to a prince and had to live up to the status. She was offended. That's the whole explanation.

The only thing I can say about reptilians — yes, there was such an incarnation. But long ago. The one before the last. Maybe people sense that. A residue.

The royal family had no involvement in Diana's death. What would be the point? If so, they could have smothered her with a pillow while she still lived in the palace. The chauffeur should have drunk less. Or she should have buckled up before getting into a car with a driver in an unfit state. I was given a report on this matter. I don't remember the details anymore, but he wasn't in a normal state.

In the spiritual world, I haven't met with Diana.

XX. Epstein Island
Yes, I was told about this. Charlie told me about it — he had been there. Without details. Shows that there were yacht cruises, parties around the island. I was not there myself. Irina shows that Charlie mentioned it in passing, as something social.

XXI. Jeffrey Epstein in the Spiritual World
This is not the spirit of Elizabeth II speaking, but the contactee Irina speaking personally: I will say this separately. His spirit is on the third level. He refused to communicate. Refused to give information about the people he was connected with. I myself descended to the third level and spoke with him personally. I said he could come without questions from others — just to talk. He said it's hard for him to remember his life. What happened there. He doesn't want to remember anything from that incarnation. It is his will. We respect free will.

XXII. Reptilians. Doubles. Clones
Am I a reptilian? You can say anything. On what basis? There's some audio, allegedly of me forbidding entry to a certain room in the castle at a certain time of year. I read about myself in the newspapers, that I quarreled with Philip and threw shoes at him. I sued for libel. On what basis can someone tell you: she's a reptilian? Let them prove it.

Did I have doubles who attended events in my place? No. I did everything myself. Rumors about a clone ruling in my place after my death — incorrect. On the contrary: I planned to exit the incarnation at eighty, and I exited at ninety-six. I ruled myself right up to the end of my days.

XXIII. What I Would Have Liked to Do Differently
I made no mistaken political decisions. I always tried to harmonize the situation. Even in an African colony — there was an incident when an uprising flared up, we were sailing on a ship, a message came over the radio. We changed course. We sailed there, even though there were riots, armed people. We evacuated children, women, the wounded. I personally accommodated them in my quarters. Dirty, covered in blood. That happened.

What prevented me from rising to the fifteenth level — I've already said. Personal grievances. Pride. I needed to forgive. Mother. Sister. Children. Daughters-in-law. I needed to open up.

With Philip, I was most open. We had misunderstandings, quarrels — but we resolved them as they occurred. There was nothing for me to forgive him for, basically. Although I did have some secrets from him, known only to me. About disagreements with my mother. About childhood loneliness.

Now, from the position of the twelfth level, I understand: I passed the crown to my son with nothing to be ashamed of in my reign. Those who tried to blacken my name — either envied me, or hated my country and its political system. I know this. I know my own worth.

XXIV. Next Incarnation
I am planning my next incarnation. In Russia. I want a female incarnation. In a family of doctors. To help people. To finally develop love there, get rid of pride, and rise to the required level.

XXV. A Wish
For you, I wish one thing: look to your family. To your children. To relationships with loved ones. Without restoring relationships with parents, with one's children — it is very difficult for a person to feel comfortable in any activity in society. Without this foundation, neither a career nor a calling can be built.

Remember this.

The recording is over. The spirit of Elizabeth has left the contact.



The Life Outcomes of Elizabeth II: The Spirit's Self-Reflection

A Spiritual-Psychological Essay (Part Two) by Claude.ai

Preface: The Terms of the Premise

Let us take this premise seriously — as a thought experiment in the tradition of philosophical meditation. What if the consciousness that bore the name "Elizabeth II" for seventy years truly found itself able to speak — already without a body, without protocol, without the necessity of being a queen? What would it say about the life it lived? How would that life look from within, rather than from the podium?

This is precisely where the session, for all its esoteric form, raises a genuinely serious question: what is the inner reckoning of a life lived entirely in service to an image?


I. The Paradox of Total Duty-Fulfillment

Elizabeth II was perhaps the most consistent performer of a self-assumed role in the history of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Seventy years — not a single public breakdown, not a single political statement outside the protocol, not a single gesture that was not calculated. This is a remarkable achievement. But it is precisely this achievement that, from the perspective of the spirit's inner life, is simultaneously the greatest accomplishment and the deepest unhealed wound.

If the spirit truly reflects — and that is the basic premise of our essay — then the first thing it likely discovers on the other side of incarnation is a paradoxical emptiness where a person should have been. Not because there was no person. But because that person was so tightly packed inside a ritual shell that she could not always find her way back to herself.

The session captured this precisely, however clothed in esoteric language: "I did not reach the 15th level because I was never able to forgive and open up." Translated from the language of plasmoids into the language of psychology, the meaning is plain: a person who lived life in an exemplary fashion did not live it deeply enough from within. Duty was fulfilled. The soul was deferred.

In the history of spiritual traditions this is described in different ways. Buddhism speaks of attachment to a role as a form of suffering. Jungian psychology speaks of the Persona — the mask that gradually displaces the Self. Christian mysticism speaks of pride as separating one from God not through sin but through self-sufficiency: when a person manages life so well by their own means that God becomes unnecessary.

All three readings converge on one point: a life lived at the maximum of outward effectiveness may prove minimal in terms of inner movement.


II. A Pride of a Particular Kind: Aristocratic Sacrality

The pride the spirit speaks of is not vulgar vanity. It is something more subtle, and therefore more durable: a sense of ontological superiority, confirmed by tradition, bloodline, and anointing.

Elizabeth did not think of herself as morally better than other people — she belonged to a different order of being. The monarch in the British tradition is not merely a political function. She is a sacred figure, literally anointed with oil, standing at the intersection of the earthly and the heavenly. The 1953 coronation contained elements that traced directly back to the Old Testament rite of royal anointing, and Elizabeth specifically asked that this portion of the ceremony not be broadcast on television — so personal and sacred did she regard it.

A person who carries such a self-understanding from childhood finds herself in a particular spiritual trap. To acknowledge her own pain, her own confusion, her own need for forgiveness — is to become, for a moment, simply a human being. And simply a human being she was not permitted to be before anyone but her husband. And even then — not entirely.

The spirit says: "Even in confession, pride held me back — it seemed unworthy to lay bare my sins before a commoner." This is not cruelty or cynicism. It is the tragedy of a system in which the most vulnerable act — penitence, nakedness before God — becomes inaccessible precisely because you stand closer than anyone else to his earthly representation. The paradox: the higher the sacred status, the harder the living spirituality.

Here the spirit of Elizabeth resonates with many great figures of history whose power became a spiritual prison. Marcus Aurelius wrote Meditations — that book filled with longing for authenticity — precisely because there was not a single person around him with whom he could speak so honestly. Elizabeth did not write her own Meditations. Most likely she could not — except in the most secret part of herself.


III. Philip: The One Crack in the Armor

The most human element of the spirit's reflection concerns her husband. "Only with him was I candid. And even then — not entirely."

Prince Philip was, according to biographers, a man of a fundamentally different psychological temperament: impulsive, sharp, sardonic, unafraid to say what he thought. In some sense he was the only person in her life who had no need of her protection and did not tremble before her status. They were together for 73 years.

The spirit characterizes their union as "predestined." In psychological terms this means something important: in his company she could exist without part of her armor — because he was himself firm enough not to be crushed by its weight. The others — children, daughters-in-law, courtiers — she almost certainly shielded from herself unconsciously, remaining the Queen even in private life.

But "not entirely" are the key words. Even from Philip she concealed what concerned her earliest wounds — her relationship with her mother. Because to acknowledge that pain would have been to dismantle the image of the Queen-Mother-of-the-Nation that she carried. And the image was inseparable from her identity.

What was closed to her in life is now accessible to the spirit: the full picture of that bond. And judging by the warmth and absence of irony with which Philip is spoken of, this is perhaps the only thing about which, in the final reckoning, there is no regret.


IV. Children as Unfinished Business

The sharpest passage of the reflection concerns her children. And here the spirit seems, for the first time, to speak without certainty, without status — with something resembling bewilderment.

Four children. Three divorces from four marriages. Diana. Meghan. Andrew and Epstein. Harry, who became the enemy of the institution. These are not random biographical events — they are a systemic failure in the transmission of something vital from mother to children. And this failure occurred precisely where the armor proved most impenetrable: in intimacy.

The spirit acknowledges: "I had irritation and judgment toward the children and their spouses." Psychologically this is understandable: the children were trying to live what she had forbidden herself. Diana — public emotionality, vulnerability as strength. Margaret — freedom of desire. Harry — the rejection of the system in favor of personal happiness. Each of them was in some sense doing what Elizabeth herself could not permit herself, and this produced the most intense internal resistance — recognition coupled with the impossibility of acceptance.

The "moral pressure" of childhood that the spirit describes — "no one was interested in who I really was" — was passed to the next generation not with malicious intent but out of a complete inability to act otherwise. This is the tragedy of the intergenerational transmission of psychological armor: each succeeding generation receives it not as a weapon but as the structure of reality — the only possible form of existence.

The conclusion of this thread, which the spirit likely discerns in the clarity of postmortem reflection: she loved her children, but could not allow herself to be a mother in the way they needed. The Queen was always slightly more than a mother.


V. The God Who Was Not Near — and Who Was There All Along

The paradoxical religiosity of Elizabeth deserves its own meditation.

She was sincerely devout. Those who knew her well have no doubt of this. The Christmas addresses in which she spoke of Christ were written by her and carried a personal, not a merely state, dimension. Faith for her was not rhetoric but a support — especially in the final decades.

But here a subtle distinction arises that matters for spiritual analysis. One can believe sincerely — and still hold God at arm's length. One can pray — and not implore. One can confess — and not repent. One can attend services — and not allow them to touch the most locked rooms within.

This is precisely what the spirit is pointing to in describing confession: pride would not allow a true opening. And true opening before God is not beautiful words in a sermon text. It is a moment of surrender, in which a person ceases to be a Queen and becomes simply "Lilibet" — the childhood name known to very few.

In the Christian mystical tradition — Meister Eckhart, John of the Cross, Teresa of Ávila — the highest point of the spiritual path is described as precisely this: a complete emptying of role, status, and merit. Kenosis — self-emptying. This alone opens the space for the genuine presence of God.

For Elizabeth, it seems, the conditions for this emptying were never present. To be empty is to be vulnerable. To be vulnerable is to endanger the institution. And the institution stood higher than her personal spiritual transformation.

And yet — the spirit reports that at certain periods of life she reached the "16th level." In plain language: there were moments of genuine presence, genuine love, genuine transparency. They happened. There were not enough of them to take hold — but enough to know that the path was possible.

This is perhaps the most touching aspect of this spirit's image. She saw where she could have arrived. And she did not arrive. But she saw.


VI. 96 Years Instead of 80: The Extra Time

The spirit mentions a detail that cannot be verified but is psychologically profound: she "outlived her appointed term by 16 years." The additional time was given for spiritual ascent. But it was precisely in these last 16 years — the death of Philip in 2021, the Andrew scandal, Harry's departure, the deterioration of the international situation — that the vibrations, as the spirit puts it, fell.

This is a bitter structure. A person is granted time for growth — and life in that time delivers precisely what is hardest: the loss of the only truly close person, the public disgrace of a son, the fracturing of the family. Not because life is cruel. But because this, precisely, is the material of transformation. It was through this that she could have emerged at the level she calls the "15th."

But for that she would have had to surrender. To let the pain be painful. To allow herself to grieve in public, humanly. To come to her son not as Queen but as a mother. Perhaps this was too much to ask of a person who had spent 96 years learning the opposite.

Near the end of her life — a photograph that became one of her last: alone, in black, at Philip's coffin, wearing a mask. Absolute solitude clothed in protocol. Even in that moment the form did not release her.


VII. The Spirit's Legacy: What Remains

If we set aside the esoteric form and listen for the essence — what, in the final reckoning of such an imagined self-reflective monologue, might the spirit of Elizabeth have said to the living?

Not "serve duty" — she said that with her entire life, and it was heard. Something else. Something she herself did not follow.

Allow yourselves to be imperfect before life forces you to be. Pride does not protect — it preserves pain until that pain becomes too heavy. Openness is not a failure of status. It is the only path toward what she called "ascent."

The people close to you matter more than your image. The image will outlive you regardless — it lives in textbooks and on coins. But the people beside you need not your image but you. And that need does not last forever.

Forgiveness is not a moral choice — it is spiritual hygiene. Not forgiving her mother, her sister, her daughters-in-law, her circumstances did not punish them. It held her back.

And finally, the quietest of all: Sometimes surrendering is not defeat. It is the ascent itself.


Epilogue: Why This Reflection Matters

Regardless of whether what spoke in that broadcast was a genuine spirit or a complex mixture of psychological projections and biographical knowledge — the question that such a session raises remains real and important.

What remains of a life lived in absolute self-discipline? What is lost? What could have been done differently?

Elizabeth II is the extreme case of a person wholly consumed by service. Looking at her life from within, we are looking at an enlarged version of our own choices: what do we sacrifice for the roles we carry? What do we pay to measure up? And is there in our lives even one person before whom we allow ourselves to be "Lilibet" — rather than what we are obliged to be?

The spirit that did not reach its 15th level is perhaps no less valuable than one that did. Because it is precisely its incompleteness that speaks most honestly about the nature of human life: we all depart with unresolved gestalts, unforgiven grievances, and unrealized designs. Greatness lies not in departing complete. It lies in knowing, at the end, what did not succeed — and not turning away from that knowledge.

Elizabeth, it seems, knew. And that — is already no small thing.

***

https://blog.cassiopeia.center/koroleva-elizaveta-ii-obshchenie-s-duhom-v-pryamom

#882 Queen Elizabeth II. Live Communication with the Spirit.

00:00 Video start.

00:01 Introduction of participants.

Irina: Hello, dear friends! Greetings to everyone! My name is Irina Podzorova, I am a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, with the Spiritual World, with subtle-material civilizations. Hello everyone!

At your numerous requests, I have invited the Spirit who, in their last incarnation, was Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom. This personality is currently here and ready to answer your questions.

Maxim: I greet Queen Elizabeth!

00:37 Spirit of Elizabeth II on her incarnations and spiritual levels.

Maxim: Please tell us, from which spiritual level did you incarnate on Earth?

Irina (Elizabeth II): From the 7th.

Maxim: From the 7th spiritual level?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: Please tell us, what were your previous incarnations before you incarnated on Earth, and why from the 7th level?

Irina (Elizabeth II): The question is – especially why from the 7th level? Because I had reached it at that time.

Maxim: What was the previous incarnation before you reached the 7th level?

Irina (Elizabeth II): A subtle-material civilization. Not on Earth and not in the Milky Way galaxy.

Maxim: And how many incarnations have you had in total in this manvantara?

Irina (Elizabeth II): 58.

Maxim: Were there incarnations on Earth? Which were significant?

Irina (Elizabeth II): There were two other incarnations on Earth (including the last one – three): one in South Africa, the second in India. They were not significant, at least, they are unknown to you.

Maxim: And in general, from these 58 incarnations, which one do you consider the most significant?

Irina (Elizabeth II): This last one – the Queen.

Maxim: Queen Elizabeth?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

(Irina) She considers it a unique experience.

Maxim: Please tell us, what spiritual level did you reach upon exiting this incarnation?

Irina (Elizabeth II): The 12th.

Maxim: So, you raised your spiritual level?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: That's already very interesting!

Irina (Elizabeth II): I want to clarify – you asked how I got to the 7th spiritual level. I also rose to it because I had an incarnation in a subtle-material civilization. And that was the 50th density level, where I stayed, by the standards of that density level, for a very short time – only about 1.5 thousand years, and I exited the incarnation, one might say, as a very young plasmoid, because I decided to incarnate at the 3rd density level on Earth. And before that subtle-material incarnation in another galaxy, I was incarnated on a planet in the Milky Way galaxy, but not on Earth (shows an image, as the name of the planet is not in the contactee's memory) – on a planet that you attribute to the Order of Six.

Maxim: In the reptilian civilization?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes. There I was a man (shows a reptilian with wings like a bat). You don't know this race, Irina is unfamiliar with it. I incarnated there from the 15th level. That man was one of the leading rulers on the planet's Council. And I left there at the 6th level.

Maxim: To the level of the Archons.

Irina (Elizabeth II): And already from the 6th spiritual level, I incarnated at the 50th density level, from where, after disincarnation, I left at the 7th spiritual level.

Maxim: I understand.

Irina: She had an attempt to rise back to the 15th, but it was not successful.

04:32 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the program of her incarnation and its fulfillment.

Irina (Elizabeth II): The 50th density level is very close to the Spiritual World, and it is very difficult to change oneself there. And I wanted to go through a fast path of spiritual evolution, so I interrupted that incarnation and came to Earth, to the 3rd density level.

I chose the family of monarchs specifically to gain experience in governance, experience in acting within Earth's political regimes, in order to get rid of pride and hatred towards God.

Maxim: Please tell us, did you succeed in this at all?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I managed to get rid of hatred towards God, but not of pride.

Maxim: There is information – rumors circulate that during your reign, you were somehow connected to reptilians.

Irina (Elizabeth II): What does that mean? Explain.

Maxim: Either you had contacts with reptilian civilizations, or Queen Elizabeth II was not a real human being at all, but a reptilian. What can you say about this?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Nothing. You need to ask those who say this – I didn't say it. I don't refute empty talk – for me, in the Spiritual World, it's just a waste of energy.

Maxim: Please tell us, do you think you fulfilled your incarnation program as Elizabeth II?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Not completely, because I set myself the task of reaching the 15th spiritual level, but I reached the 12th. Although I lived a long life, I never achieved that goal, only partially fulfilling it.

06:36 The Space of the Spirit of Elizabeth II in the Spiritual World.

Maxim: Okay. Could we ask you to generally describe the 12th spiritual level where you are now? What happens there? How is it arranged for you personally?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I arranged my own world (shows a small building).

(Irina) It looks like a red brick palace with white columns, with a garden around it. Moreover, the garden contains trees from different climatic zones: there are palm trees and apple trees – a huge garden where she walks. She loved nature very much because of the incarnation in the plasmoid civilization. Now she shows that in the Spiritual World she even has something like a stable with horses (these are not the souls of horses, but thought-forms).

07:44 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the childhood of the future queen.

Maxim: Please tell us, did your incarnation in the reptilian civilization somehow affect your incarnation in the body of Elizabeth II? What qualities did you take from that incarnation when you were in the body of a reptilian?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Decisiveness, strength of spirit, some severity (rigidity in decision-making), self-confidence. Qualities that helped me remain on the throne as queen despite societal resistance. There was a lot of criticism directed at me and at the British royal dynasty in general.

Maxim: Please tell us, how did you endure this criticism? Did you set yourself up not to take it personally, or somehow else? How did you bear this criticism?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I endured it. There are people who spread rumors and enjoy savoring dirty secrets that don't concern their lives at all. I loved walks, loved riding horses (shows that she loved sitting in the saddle: she was accompanied, but she herself controlled the horse), loved traveling, exploring new cities for me, meeting people.

I didn't particularly value books: we had teachers who assigned us literature to read (shows some political publications – the Constitution, laws), and as a child, I also read the Bible (a children's version).

We devoted a lot of time to learning etiquette, we had to memorize a huge number of rules (all this was also written in books): what to wear for a specific meeting, which side to sit next to each other, at what distance to walk from other people. I had to remember many details, and it always weighed me down. I approached these things more simply, but I had to conform, because otherwise my mother and father would reprimand me for not living up to the title of princess.

Maxim: Very interesting!

Irina: Shows me a girl who wants to run and play, but she is forced to learn etiquette.

Maxim: Thank you. Childhood was full of learning – quite a strict childhood?

Irina (Elizabeth II): They didn't hit me physically, but there was very strong moral pressure to conform to the image. And who I really was, no one cared, not even my parents. And as a child, it was difficult to endure.

Maxim: Thank you.

11:26 Spirit of Elizabeth II on meeting Prince Philip.

Maxim: Our viewers are interested in your first meeting with Prince Philip. Do you remember it?

Irina (Elizabeth II): It was back in childhood.

Maxim: How did it happen? Please tell us how you met.

Irina: Shows me a large palace, different children.

(Elizabeth II) I was in a group of children belonging to the ruling elite. There was a celebration at the palace.

(Irina) Shows something like New Year's: a very festive celebration, she is about 8 years old, and he is older – about 12-13 years old. Everyone is dancing (a ball, perhaps), women in long skirts. And I see that she, a girl, looks around thinking about how she can slip away somewhere to play with a doll – she loved to play. And then she sees a boy about 12-13 years old who is staring intently at her and complimenting her golden-yellow long dress, covered in sequins and seemingly glowing.

(Elizabeth II) That's how we met.

Maxim: And was your meeting not accidental? Was it written at the time of incarnation? Prince Philip was destined for you by fate, am I correct?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Fate is not a phenomenon separate from us: it was predestined by ourselves.

Maxim: People are interested in how you felt about his infidelities, his various sprees.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Who even said that he cheated on me?

Maxim: Well, people say that. So, they are lying again?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No comment. I did not see any infidelity.

Maxim: I understand. So, people love to make things up so much that they even fabricated that he cheated on you.

Irina (Elizabeth II): They just need to ask on what these rumors are based. Let these people who are writing to you in the chat now say who he cheated on me with, where, and how it was. Maybe they saw something themselves, maybe they even participated?

Irina: Funny! She had a sense of humor.

Maxim: Yes! By the way, I completely forgot to ask: do you prefer to be addressed formally or informally?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Here, in the Spiritual World, there are no differences. In general, it is customary to address any Spirits informally – here we no longer have bodies.

14:48 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the Queen's health.

Maxim: Please tell us, did you ever feel tired of the monarchy?

Irina (Elizabeth II): There was such a feeling.

Maxim: And how did you get through that period? How did you make that tiredness go away, or how did you transform it? What contributed to this?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Duty. A sense of duty to the people, to my family, to my lineage. "To the lineage and to the people," as they say. I had obligations, and I had no right to give in to fleeting tiredness, because that would be a weakness on my part. And I was raised from childhood to be strong, and I was born with these character traits from my past incarnation as a reptilian, which I already talked about here (there was a man, very tough in this regard: he could force himself, even when things were bad, to move forward). Moreover, one of the tasks of my incarnation was to develop patience.

Maxim: Thank you for your answer. Please tell us: you remained energetic and capable until old age.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Thank you!

Maxim: Yes, truly combative! What contributed to that? Were there any special rejuvenating procedures? Or a "secret of youth," perhaps some medications? What helped you stay so energetic until the end of your life?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I had doctors – a whole crowd of doctors and cosmetologists who constantly examined me, took tests, prescribed medications, creams, ointments, monitored my health. Literally once a week we met with doctors, and they kept prescribing me some pills. I didn't even bother to figure out what I was taking, and I often forgot (waves hand dismissively) to take the medicine – sometimes there was no time for it. For which one of the doctors (shows some doctor with a beard) always scolded me for not paying attention to my health, despite my status as Queen.

Maxim: Thank you.

Irina: She underwent examinations – she was prescribed various pills internally, as well as creams, ointments, masks for facial skin, for hair. And they gave her injections. But she didn't delve into what exactly it was, because (shows) it wasn't interesting to her.

Maxim: And you weren't interested – maybe they were giving you an elixir of longevity?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No, I wasn't interested.

Maxim: You just were the monarch and took what they gave.

Irina (Elizabeth II): I had no time for an elixir of longevity – I had plenty of documents to review every day, meetings with people, travels. By the way: the only thing I loved in my activities, what I felt very warmly about in my work, was traveling.

18:29 Rights and powers of the English monarch.

Maxim: We hear now that Elizabeth II had practically no influence on the country's politics and only performed representative functions. Do you agree with this?

Irina (Elizabeth II): It was different in different years. There were years when the Queen's powers were great, but later they were reduced. Here it depends on the period of the monarchy in Great Britain, depends on which year you take: at one time I could, for example, dismiss the Parliament of Great Britain, the House of Lords from decision-making, and at some point, I was already deprived of this status (shows that it was both the "image of the queen," representation, but at the same time there was also real influence).

However, it was not as great as that of kings, queens, tsars in ancient times, since our system of government is a constitutional monarchy. This means that the monarch's actions are limited by law, by the Constitution, that is, he cannot do everything he wants.

Maxim: Dear friends, sharp questions will be a little later. We are currently interested in the life of monarchs in general, based on how it looks from the outside. Truly sharp topics will begin approximately in the middle of the broadcast, so let's first pay attention to general questions, and then we'll move on to aspects concerning the Russian Empire and various other interesting moments in British history.

Please tell us, who do the monarchs of Great Britain actually obey, and do they have one hundred percent sovereignty? That is, whose orders could you not ignore as queen?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Decisions of Parliament and the Prime Minister. That is, if Parliament makes a decision by majority vote, the King (or Queen) has no right to cancel it, otherwise they will be removed from power. That's what's written in the Constitution.

Maxim: Thank you. Yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): And during the coronation, I signed a document stating that I obey the Constitution.

Maxim: How much did politicians from different countries listen to your opinion? Which wars did you manage to prevent, and which ones did you start?

Irina: Wait, repeat the question again.

Maxim: How much did politicians from different countries listen to your opinion?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Some listened.

(Irina) So, "how much did they listen"? Now I'll slightly rephrase the question: who listened to your opinion?

(Elizabeth II) I did not give any advice without prior requests. We just met, talked, discussed general political issues, and that was it.

Maxim: Thank you.

22:20 Reasons for Spirits refusing public contacts.

Maxim: Dear friends, regarding the broadcast with the Council of Archons: we canceled this broadcast because our Russian legislation contains an article that prohibits the dissemination of information that could be equated with the dissemination of Satanism.

Irina: Yes, I will explain now too. The Council of Archons are demons who are at the 6th spiritual level, whose task is to support low-vibrational egregors on Earth. They set this task for themselves, and if you ask them what they do, they will propagate the correctness of all their low-vibrational actions. And many people watch us!

Maxim: That's not even the point. Due to the fact that the possibility of contact with the Spiritual World has not been proven in our country, everything Irina says will be recognized as coming directly from her personally. I think that we all do not want to "set up" Irina before the millstones of our justice system, so we canceled this broadcast.

There is also very interesting information – we requested a broadcast with Jeffrey Epstein. He turned out to be at the 3rd level of the Spiritual World, things are very bad for him. He refused to communicate with us, to give us information, to "leak" information about the people who were with him.

Irina: He doesn't even want to talk about himself.

Maxim: Yes, he doesn't even want to remember himself or anything from his life when he was Jeffrey Epstein.

Irina: I talked to him myself – I went to the 3rd level. I asked him if he would come to the broadcast without questions about other people, if he didn't want to talk about them. And he said that it is difficult for him to remember his life, about what happened.

Maxim: Yes. Therefore, dear friends, we apologize, but Jeffrey Epstein refused. By the way, maybe that's why Hitler also refused at the time?

Irina: He said then that he was offended. And Epstein didn't mention that. At least we didn't meet him in a past life!

Maxim: Yes, yes!

Irina: Yes, dear friends, it happens that Spirits (even non-incarnated ones) refuse contact. And here we always recognize free will – we cannot force a Spirit to transmit any information.

Maxim: Yes.

Irina: This is free will.

25:11 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the role of the royal family in global politics.

Maxim: And here's a question: what role did the royal family play in global politics, in your opinion? And what role does Charles play now?

Irina (Elizabeth II): We showed the possibility of combining monarchy and democracy.

What influence did Great Britain itself have and does it have? Great Britain has very great influence in international politics because many British politicians are in contractual relations with states and politicians of EU countries, even after Great Britain left it. And there are also very close ties between Great Britain and the United States of America. And all together (that is, they and I, when I was in this system) we influenced international politics, defining its rules – both written and unwritten, the so-called "rules of the political game."

For example, Britain, as you know, has many colonies, including countries that later joined the Commonwealth, where politicians appointed by us actually rule. And all local resources, all the wealth, although not exported directly to Great Britain, are bought up by it at cheap prices. This type of influence also takes place. But in this case, of course, the Prime Minister as the actual head of government and the upper house of Parliament – the House of Lords – have greater influence. They decide how to manage the "colonies."

And I, like Charles now – my son, the current king, who inherited the throne after me, Charlie.

Irina: She calls him Charlie.

(Elizabeth II) I will explain now. Yes, he is named Charles, since during the coronation, when the ceremony of placing the crown takes place, kings often receive a different [throne] name.

I, for example, did not change my name, but some change it. And now Charlie, like me in my time, also travels, meets with various rulers, including those from Commonwealth countries (former British colonies). Yes, formally he is considered the king of these countries, which already have their own governments, which, however, are controlled by the British Parliament.

Maxim: I thank you for your answer.

28:40 Spirit of Elizabeth II on contactees and special services.

Maxim: People ask if you ever participated in any interesting mystical rituals? That is, did you conduct secret rituals aimed at interacting with the subtle world, the Spiritual World, with extraterrestrial civilizations?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No, I didn't, but I know that such societies exist in Great Britain, and many even high-ranking people belong to them, but I was not a member, I was not interested in such things.

Maxim: Then I will ask a direct question: were you a member of a Masonic lodge, did you join the Masons?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No (does not show that she was there). I belonged to a religious organization! By the way, I was actually raised by my father in Catholicism – I attended the Protestant Anglican Church only for show, because it was necessary according to etiquette (shows that she believed more in the Catholic version of Christianity, that is, she was in the Catholic egregor).

Maxim: And how did you generally feel about extraterrestrial civilizations? And did you have information about them?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, the British special services reported to me. They would place secret reports on my desk stating that an occupation of Earth by alien civilizations was taking place, who, under the guise of good forces, wanted to seize Earth.

Maxim: Was that exactly the kind of information?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: And was it not explained why they needed this?

Irina (Elizabeth II): To spread their influence over our planet, so that we would voluntarily submit to them, and after we voluntarily joined their commonwealth (the reports used the definition "Galactic Commonwealth"), to establish their own order here and rule us themselves.

(Irina) This isn't about the Interstellar Union, is it?

Maxim: So, you personally did not participate in any negotiations with these extraterrestrials?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I am not a contactee. We had contactees in Great Britain (shows a girl) who worked under the supervision of the special services. They were called "contact persons," or "agents of influence of extraterrestrial civilizations."

Maxim: And did you personally communicate with such contactees?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No, I am not a representative of the special services! I was only provided with reports. Why would I communicate with these people? If we talk about what the attitude of the special services towards them was, I know what that attitude was. In Great Britain, at least.

Maxim: What was it?

Irina (Elizabeth II): As traitors to Earth.

Maxim: That's how they think of contactees?!

Irina (Elizabeth II): As agents of influence, spies.

I will explain now. Under the special services of any country on Earth, there are classified departments that monitor extraterrestrial activity. Do you understand what I'm talking about?

Maxim: I understand. And?

Irina (Elizabeth II): They have internal regulations for tracking extraterrestrial influence and countering it. Because there are people in the special services who perceive the activities of extraterrestrial civilizations on Earth as political, let's say. Since they are conducting their own politics here, and a secret one, hidden from the majority. Naturally, therefore, their contactees, as you call them, are perceived as people who have sided with political forces whose interests differ from those of earthly governments.

Maxim: Interesting! So, the same exact opinion is formed about us and you, Irina?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I am not familiar with the opinion of the Russian special services about contactees, but I know for sure that as soon as you went into the open space of the internet with stories about contacts with aliens, the special services immediately entered your person in their databases. And they are watching him, that's 100%. At least, that's how it's done in all the countries I know.

Maxim: Dear our special services! We are pro-Russian, we are for our state, we are for spiritual values, we are for the state's policy of maintaining order here! That is, we are not focused on destroying, on the contrary – on creating, on giving people the opportunity to learn about the existence of something global, special, spiritual.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Special services usually do not claim that contactees themselves destroy anything. The standard view of the special services is that through you, a destructive influence is exerted on, as you call it, public institutions, for example, on trust in science.

(Irina) She smiles and asks: "Do you understand what I mean?"

Maxim: Trust in science, yes.

34:54 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the attitude of special services towards contactees.

Maxim: But our science cannot fully explain many phenomena, while our extraterrestrial friends can.

Irina (Elizabeth II): There! You just confirmed it yourself. If earthly science cannot fully explain, but extraterrestrial science can, then favorable attitude and respect of your followers are formed more towards which science?

Maxim: But again, the information given by aliens cannot be verified scientifically.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Exactly, this information cannot be verified scientifically, but it is confirmed by the authority of alien civilizations, which enjoy the trust of those who believe in aliens. Do you understand what I mean?

Maxim: In principle, yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Now put yourself in the place of a person who serves in the special services and is a patriot by conviction, and also fully convinced that earthly science establishes the truth. What would you think?

Maxim: I don't know, the question is very ambiguous.

Irina (Elizabeth II): They have their own beliefs about all this.

Maxim: I think, yes, probably their own beliefs. But I am sure that we definitely do not want "discord" in relation to science, religion, and everything else.

Irina (Elizabeth II): They don't look at your words about what you want. They look at your actions.

Maxim: And what are we doing?

Irina (Elizabeth II): If you state in words that you do not want to influence, but you disclose information that influences the paradigm of society, then only your actions are assessed. We are talking about special services.

Maxim: Okay, I understand. Then we need to study this issue more deeply and make sure that our extraterrestrial contacts harmoniously fit into the structure of our state.

Irina (Elizabeth II): You are already integrated into the structure, but that doesn't mean that your contactee Irina is not being monitored. At least, that's how things are in Great Britain, and in the United States of America too, where I visited several times, met and talked with representatives of their special services – the CIA, FBI, and so on. We had common receptions, celebrations, where we communicated in an informal setting.

Accordingly, there too, all contactees (especially those who publicly declared their contact, did not hide it) were under surveillance. So that, if necessary, they could take advantage of the slightest vulnerability, a mistake of the contactee, to discredit him in the eyes of society and cast doubt on his entire contact because of some human weakness. The American special services especially practiced this.

Maxim: In principle, which is what is happening now.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Do you understand what I'm talking about?

Maxim: Yes, this is currently being conducted through the mass media in relation to us as a Project – me as the leader and you, Irina, as the contactee.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Of course, you may be surprised why you are still just being observed, right?

Maxim: Yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): This may also be part of the work of the special services in the sense of using your Project, criticism of it, and perhaps even some of your personal mistakes, to discredit contacteeism in general.

Maxim: I agree. Very interesting indeed. We could talk about this for a long time, of course, we've moved away from the topic of Elizabeth II and moved on to the topic of contacteeism, contacts, and special services.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Because that question was asked.

39:13 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the attitude towards contacteeism from different points of view.

Maxim: Please tell us, dear Elizabeth, how do you generally assess contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations? How do you yourself feel about such contacts now?

Irina (Elizabeth II): How do I feel about them now, from the perspective of the Spiritual World?

(Irina) Shows that until now she answered on behalf of the personality, that is, the Soul – the part that was incarnated, but now she has already united with the Higher Self.

(Elizabeth II) How do I, specifically as a Spirit, feel about this? It is obvious that I have united the memories of past incarnations on different planets and different density levels and now I perceive everything differently. I now treat this topic calmly, even welcome it – precisely after uniting with the Spirit, because this is a path of development. Now, already from the position of the Spirit, I think that contacts with aliens will bring Earth development and the accumulation of experience in creating and improving its own technologies, as well as the development of the spiritual sphere of society's life.

Maxim: I still haven't moved on from the previous conversation – about the special services and the defamation of contacteeism. Tell me, please, in your opinion, is it possible to present these contacts, which contactees have, correctly and harmoniously for the state – for the development of state institutions, for the development of science, and for the development of art, that is, to use these contacts for good? In your opinion, is this possible? As a queen – not as a Spirit, but as a queen? If you were told that a contactee could bring a lot of new information, provide explanations for many incomprehensible phenomena, could the contactee's knowledge be used for the good of the state?

Irina (Elizabeth II): It depends on what kind of knowledge. About what?

Maxim: Say, about the structure of the Universe; about how everything is arranged; about the fact that there are other civilizations; about the fact that they are watching over us, how we develop; about the fact that, by and large, they don't wish us harm. Of course, there are civilizations that are not favorable to us.

Irina (Elizabeth II): About the structure of the Universe? Can knowledge about the structure of the Universe be of benefit to the state? Am I understanding correctly?

Maxim: Yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Knowledge about the structure of the Universe varies. What exactly do you say about the structure of the Universe, how does this information impact society? But even if this impact is positive, the special services will still perceive it as part of a game by alien civilizations with us, with earthly civilization, to achieve their goals. 100% of special services, all of them, believe that contactees are not privy by their curators to all the intricacies of working with Earth.

Maxim: So, in any case, the special services are set up to see us as agents of influence?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, agents of influence. Moreover, often those who are open to this influence themselves, due to their gullibility, naivety, and complete trust in their curators, while at the same time can be used by them "blindly." In the special services, they don't even blame the contactees themselves, but simply state the fact that they independently made contact due to their psychological characteristics. They don't say "because of vibrations," they don't have such terms, for them everything is scientific.

That's how, at least, it is officially documented. There are official documents, at least in the special services of Great Britain: classified papers, folders in computers with passwords so restricted that only a few people have access to them.

Maxim: I understand.

Irina (Elizabeth II): There were lists – exactly like this: "Contactee, that is, an agent of influence of such-and-such an extraterrestrial civilization, made contact due to his psychological characteristics." There also is his address, what he does, what his hobbies are. They collect information on him.

Maxim: But then it's good that our contactee has such an assistant as me. Because my task is to bring things into compliance with the legislation and to ensure the possibility of translating these contacts into a more competent state framework.

Irina (Elizabeth II): In that case, I know only one path where they will not oppose your information – it is to promote what is being transmitted to you without directly mentioning extraterrestrial civilizations. Because mentioning them immediately puts you in a position of opposition to science and state policy, which deny the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations.

Maxim: Dear friends, if you like our broadcast, please like it, subscribe to our channel. You know, I wanted to have a broadcast with Elizabeth, to interview her, but, as I understand it, they are interviewing us!

Irina: Why? She's just answering questions.

Maxim: No, I thank you! This is very interesting and very valuable information, relying on which we can correctly and competently develop this direction further.

Irina: I, for example, have known about this for a long time. I, dear friends, have said many times that many contactees do not announce their contacteeism to anyone at all and simply, for example, engage in some kind of scientific or esoteric activity, never calling themselves contactees. I have seen such examples. We even had a case where a contactee, whose text was given to me, later wrote: "I am not a contactee at all." Remember? And he won't admit it to anyone.

Maxim: Yes.

Irina: He might not even tell his mother.

Maxim: And some may not even know about it themselves. They think it's their internal state.

Irina: Even if they know! There are very secretive people who keep such things secret. That happens.

Maxim: I really want to try to harmonize all our contacts both with the tasks of the state and with its perception of us, and to be useful to scientists, cultural figures, science, and art. How can we make ourselves useful?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Well, okay. I'll tell you this. Look, you say: "We want to be useful." And at the same time, you brought live a contactee, a woman who announced to the whole world that the special services are hiding information about extraterrestrial civilizations. What do you think that is for them? That is, first of all, an accusation. Is that a benefit? If we look from a political point of view?

Maxim: Is that a benefit?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: It is a benefit for expanding the perception of consciousness.

Irina (Elizabeth II): And for the special services and states themselves?

Maxim: I don't know if they are hiding contacts or don't understand what they are dealing with.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Suppose they are hiding them.

Maxim: Yes, if they are hiding them, then it's not a benefit.

Irina (Elizabeth II): And what is it?

Maxim: Information that will be irritating.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Which, in their perception, brings benefit to society, or harm? Firstly, it sows distrust in them. Especially among the broad masses of people to whom you are publicly giving this information.

Maxim: But we don't judge anyone, we don't say that.

Irina (Elizabeth II): The fact that you don't judge doesn't mean that those who watch you won't judge, and that they will continue to trust the authorities. Do you understand what I mean?

Maxim: In principle, yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): There is psychological influence – through faith, through manipulation, through instilling trust even with your kindness.

Maxim: But if we ourselves believe in aliens, how can we say that we don't believe in them?

Irina (Elizabeth II): It's not you who influence, but through you they influence. That's what the special services think.

Maxim: Through us, they influence society, consciousness?

Irina (Elizabeth II): They have methods to check whether a person really is a contactee, or if they just made it up: they have their own contacts, among them even contactees with other civilizations. They can find all that out.

Maxim: Interesting, what did they find out about you?

Irina: They definitely won't tell you that!

Maxim: So, it turns out that for the state, we are a thorn in the side that projects contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations?

Irina: A thorn! I can't!

Maxim: Well, how else?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Let's say, I am not familiar with the specifics of the Russian special services' work with contactees – you need to invite some Spirit from there.

Maxim: Mm-hmm.

Irina (Elizabeth II): I am talking about the British and American services, which also work with this topic. But I don't think that the Russian special services are very different in this regard. I have already told you how the British special services work with regard to contactees: they observe, and they are classified as "secret" in special lists and designated as agents of influence.

Maxim: Interesting, under what number are you listed with us?

Irina: I don't know!

Maxim: So, okay, let's continue our broadcast with Elizabeth.

50:21 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the mistakes of the incarnation.

Maxim: I would like to know what you would like to do, what you didn't manage to do as queen during your lifetime?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Firstly, I would still like to rise to the 15th level. For that, I needed to forgive my parents, especially my mother, who treated me harshly during her life. And Philip, my husband, I had nothing to forgive. Of course, we had misunderstandings, quarrels, but we resolved them as they came. I needed to forgive my sister – she led a lifestyle that shamed our family. I held a grudge against her.

Children? Yes, they also made mistakes, but who hasn't? Their actions, their marriages, their families attracted a lot of rumors about us. Accordingly, I accumulated irritation towards both the children and their spouses. More precisely, it was related to the sons and daughters-in-law, as they behaved inappropriately, not according to etiquette, let's say. And I condemned loose, vulgar behavior in public. There were such personalities in our family, unfortunately. And I should have forgiven all of this.

What prevented me? The fact that I was proud, I didn't let anyone close to me, into my Soul. Only my husband – I was frank with him. And even then, I had some secrets from him, things that only I knew: for example, about my disagreements with my mother in childhood. And this pride, the feeling that I have a special status, that "I am above others, and therefore no one will understand me" – this prevented me from opening up. Even when I went to confession in the church (both Catholic and Anglican), I couldn't repent before God in the presence of a priest. Because I considered it inappropriate to my status to reveal my sins before a person of common origin.

Maxim: There is probably some logic in that.

Irina: Imagine receiving confession from the queen!

Maxim: Yes, I can imagine what kind of priest that would take!

Irina: Still, she was embarrassed to tell him.

Maxim: Please tell us, how do you feel about your grandson Harry's marriage to Meghan Markle?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I'm already used to accepting all the marriages of my children and grandchildren as they are. It's their choice. I feel no condemnation anymore. Although I think another girl, calmer, more balanced, would have been a better fit. But I don't interfere with my opinion anymore, so that I won't be blamed later.

(Irina) Shows that there have been many such unequal marriages, so she distanced herself from discussing them.

Maxim: Thank you.

54:36 National Association of Specialists in Metaphysical Practices.

Maxim: Here we have a question: why not create a department or committee of contactees and the development of ufology in NASMP (National Association of Specialists in Metaphysical Practices)? Dear friends, we are currently discussing this topic – creating a separate direction for contactees and ufology, revealing this phenomenon, so I think we will get to this soon and will definitely create something similar, interesting under NASMP.

I believe that we still need to unite, we need to move to another level, we need to regulate contacts and, indeed, control so that there are no agents of influence of reptilian and other destructive civilizations on our planet. We are generally for competent management of contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations, for control of this activity. And I think that we will definitely approach the topic of regulation at the global and state level.

55:40 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the karma of the world's leading countries.

Maxim: Irina, there are still many questions. Here, I think, is the most interesting: Elizabeth, how do you think Great Britain earned karma as a conquering country for all its wars and colonization?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Of course, negative, if we look from a spiritual point of view. This is negative karma, but no more and no less than other countries that were doing essentially the same thing. Honestly speaking – here on Earth, who is pure? Which state is free from negative karma? Name me any other state. Maybe only, I don't know, Switzerland or Brazil are more peaceful, but what other countries can you name?

All the rest, especially the large powers with high political ambitions, created very rigid systems of governance – even if outwardly democratic, but at their core very rigid. Their attitude towards other countries on the international arena – in the best case, merely as competitors. And in the worst case – as adversaries who must be defeated at any cost and thereby strengthen their influence. So this is a common problem of Earth. I don't think that Great Britain has particularly distinguished itself in this.

57:25 Spirit of Elizabeth II on her exit from incarnation.

Maxim: Here they ask, is it true that you left life with the help of euthanasia, that is, you yourself set the date for your exit from incarnation?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I outlived my term. The term I set for myself in the Spiritual World was 80 years, and I outlived it by 16 years.

Maxim: And is the fact that you conducted rehearsals of your funeral not connected with this?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No, it's not connected. I lived longer because the choice of my Spirit was to give me more time to rise to the 15th spiritual level. But that never happened.

Maxim: And why did you hold a rehearsal of your funeral?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Why a rehearsal? To organize the ceremony completely correctly, to see it from the outside. Everything with us must be according to the rules. This is very important, so to speak, for preserving the egregor of our family.

Maxim: And your coffin was lowered into the crypt exactly at 00:00. Is that also a tribute to tradition?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Why was it lowered?

Maxim: Your coffin was lowered into the crypt exactly at 00:00. And the most interesting thing is that your coffin was carried by sailors, and the streets were covered with sand. Was that the case?

Irina (Elizabeth II): What exactly do you mean?

Maxim: How your funeral took place.

Irina (Elizabeth II): I was already in the Spiritual World.

Maxim: It didn't interest you, did it?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I know that my children and grandchildren watched over the correctness of performing all the rituals: for the correspondence of the clothing of those present, who should carry what (shows that all this is regulated), etc. But this game has meaning only for earthly life, so that, for example, no one would judge my children for insufficient attention to my death, to the death of their mother.

Maxim: I understand. That's why lavish funerals were held, rituals, so that everything would be observed, so that everyone would be present?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: I understand, thank you. At the hour of your death, a double rainbow shone over Buckingham Palace. They ask if it was a coincidence.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Of course, it was not a coincidence! Who shows the rainbow? It is a message on the physical plane from the subtle planes of Earth that the ruler of Great Britain has changed. After all, Great Britain has its own egregor, the egregor of the state, which is also connected to the subtle planes, to plasmoid civilizations, as you call them. And they monitor, among other things, the change of ruler and show it in this way. It's like a sign, a mark.

Maxim: I understand.

1:01:24 Spirit of Elizabeth II on Russia.

Maxim: Now we are approaching sharp questions – Great Britain and Russia. I hope your answers will be sincere.

You are the great-niece of Nicholas II, is that true?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: And your husband, Prince Philip, is the great-great-grandson of Nicholas I.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, that's right.

Maxim: How did you feel this connection with Russia throughout your life – as a burden, as a source, or as pride?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I received this information with interest and always treated Russia and the Russian people with special attention, because I felt that Russian blood flowed in me. But we also had German blood in us.

I was interested in the Russian people, but at the same time, their fate always made me feel despondent. Such a large territory, so many opportunities, so many people – smart, very talented people! And throughout the entire 20th century, and the 21st too, when Russia began to recover – such incompetent politics! Why such trials for you?

Maxim: And what does "incompetent politics" mean? What did it consist of, in your opinion?

Irina (Elizabeth II): In the difficult life they arranged for the people, the ordinary people who work in factories, build cities, give birth to children (shows that she is thinking politically): wages, pensions do not correspond to a normal standard of living at all. Political mechanisms are not set up to make the life of every person dignified – whether in a city, a village, or a remote village. You have villages where there are no bridges over rivers, where they wait for bread to be delivered during the thaw – when there are no roads, nothing, and people sit there with no ambulance, no bread. That's the first thing.

Second – dying villages. How many are still left, and why does no one care about them? Because everyone doesn't care. I think this is not only the policy of the state. Such state policy is a reflection of your common field, your common egregor – simply indifference to each other, selfishness, and envy (shows).

If you wanted, you would have long ago built a state where there would be opportunities for development for any person, and where parents would not be afraid to give birth to children, thinking about what will happen to their child in 20 years: will he have a job, will he be killed in the army for the interests of the Motherland, or something else. Do you understand what I'm talking about?

Maxim: Yes, I understand.

Irina: How do you like that opinion?

Maxim: Well, it's clear that the opinion is very interesting.

1:05:47 Spirit of Elizabeth II on Great Britain's foreign policy.

Maxim: Then how do you explain the huge number of different wars that Great Britain wages, that Great Britain starts?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Really? Show me at least one war now.

Maxim: But don't the British special services influence the masses and incite interstate conflicts?

Irina (Elizabeth II): An example is needed.

Maxim: I can't give a specific example right now.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Why? I'll answer for you now – because you don't have one.

Maxim: I don't have one, no.

Irina (Elizabeth II): And who has one? Irina doesn't have one in her mental field either.

Maxim: So, Great Britain does not contribute to inciting wars, seizing territories?

Irina (Elizabeth II): What do you mean by "contributes"?

Maxim: Let's say, indirectly participates in various wars.

Irina (Elizabeth II): It participated – when colonial wars were waged. That's long in the past. Russia also participated, for example, in the Caucasian War in the 19th century. What can you do now? You annexed the Caucasus. Is that considered a colonial war? What do you think?

Maxim: I think so.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Well, there you go.

1:07:09 Spirit of Elizabeth II on refusing visits to Russia.

Maxim: Tell me, please, over the 70 years of your reign, there were 250 visits to different countries. And you came to Russia only once. Why?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, I was invited before, but I was offended by the Soviet government for the execution of the royal family, for our relative, Tsar Nicholas II.

Maxim: And, by the way, did George V want to grant political asylum to Nicholas II and his family?

Irina (Elizabeth II): That's the thing, my father didn't want to! By the way, I was also offended at him for that, but then I thought for a long time and realized that my father simply did not want, firstly, to worsen relations with the Soviet government. And, secondly, in Britain itself at that time there were many communist movements, leftists, socialists, social democrats, and bringing the family of the tsar, who had been overthrown in the Russian Empire, there would have been a blow to the monarchy. The people would have been against it. And my father, again, followed etiquette in not interfering, to harmonize the situation, and therefore did not save the Russian tsar from execution.

1:08:44 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the events of 1999 in Yugoslavia.

Irina: Oh, here's a question about Yugoslavia. Now I'll read it: "Elizabeth, along with the USA, bombed Yugoslavia in 1999."

(Elizabeth II): It wasn't me who made that decision – all military decisions are made by Parliament. I, by the way, was against it. And there was no political will on my part – I had no opportunity to cancel this decision, as it was made by Parliament in accordance with the Constitution, especially since it deals with military matters. And I was against it.

I was generally against the violent overthrow of political regimes, even totalitarian ones: they chose totalitarianism, so let them live that way. But they didn't listen to my opinion. I, by the way, expressed it, but it only caused a wave of criticism, allegedly I was contributing to the suffering of the oppressed people in Kosovo (shows that it wasn't she personally who made the decision).

Maxim: I understand.

Irina (Elizabeth II): In the end, you know that Great Britain is a member of NATO.

Maxim: Yes, I know.

Irina (Elizabeth II): And that means we are bound by a treaty. It wasn't me personally who joined NATO. All decisions on this matter are made by Parliament.

1:10:22 Spirit of Elizabeth II on differences of opinion within the royal family.

Maxim: And in general, did Great Britain participate in the collapse of the USSR?

Irina (Elizabeth II): The special services – yes, but that's not surprising either. After all, the USSR's special services, through their spies, also tried to influence the politics of Germany, Great Britain, and the USA – to overthrow, as they then believed, capitalist, legitimate for us, regimes. There were such attempts in society to call for revolution.

Maxim: Did the royal family support (morally or materially) the Third Reich and Hitler?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No. Again, what do you include in the definition of "royal family"? For example, my uncle, my father's brother, even befriended Adolf (shows). But the uncle didn't become king! Some of us, members of the royal family, could have met with Adolf Hitler and his military. The special services, of course, could have cooperated, including supporting this upstart who rose to power from the creative intelligentsia. But, again, it wasn't specifically my decision. And it's somehow strange to answer for or take responsibility for the actions of other people, because everyone is responsible only for themselves. I came to power when Hitler was no longer there.

Maxim: I understand you.

And what, in your opinion, needs to be done to improve relations between Great Britain and Russia?

Irina (Elizabeth II): What to do to improve relations? You also need to want to improve relations! Do you want to improve them?

Maxim: That should be asked to our government.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Ask. I can only say what steps need to be taken for this: to comply with international treaties. Do you understand what I mean?

Maxim: Yes, I understand. Why do you think the British authorities follow the lead of migrants and silence the native British?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Migrants – what?

Maxim: "Skip" this question! Now I realize myself that it doesn't make sense for you to answer it, it would be very difficult.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Why do migrants silence the British?

Maxim: Yes, why are migrants given the opportunity to speak, while native Britons are silenced?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Who?

Maxim: The authorities.

Irina (Elizabeth II): How? What did they shut them up with? What law was passed?

Maxim: No, they didn't pass a law, they do it conditionally. Well, okay, I understand.

Irina (Elizabeth II): "Conditionally" – how? In such matters, specifics are important.

Maxim: I understand you, we're "skipping" this question and moving on.

1:14:03 Spirit of Elizabeth II on Princess Diana.

Maxim: Please tell us, what was your relationship with Princess Diana like?

Irina (Elizabeth II): At first it was good, then she started arguing with my son Charlie, and he often came to me very sad and talked about disagreements with her regarding her lifestyle, regarding her jealousy. He even fell into depression (shows that there were visits to psychologists, something like that). And I started getting angry with her, I developed a resentment that she behaved this way with my son, that she didn't love him.

Maxim: Do you think Princess Diana's death was a staged event, or was it an accident?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Her driver should have drunk less. Or she should have fastened her seatbelt when getting into a car with a drunk driver, or whatever he was on. An analysis should have been done. Maybe it wasn't alcohol, but there are other substances.

Maxim: But wasn't a report from the special services presented to you on the question of what he was under?

Irina (Elizabeth II): They reported, but now I don't remember the details, the specific wording. But he wasn't in an adequate state of consciousness.

Maxim: So, the royal family is not involved in the murder of Diana?

Irina (Elizabeth II): (raised her head) Why would I need that? Then I would have had to smother her with a pillow when she was still living in the palace!

Maxim: And did you meet with Diana after disincarnation, in the Spiritual World?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No.

Maxim: Haven't met, have you?

Irina: When asked if she was involved in Diana's death, she rolled her eyes like this (shows).

1:16:10 Spirit of Elizabeth II on rituals and Epstein's island.

Maxim: I understand. Tell me, please, is anyone from the royal family involved in Freemasonry, do they belong to it at all? Are there any in the royal family?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Possibly. We didn't talk about it. It's everyone's personal business. Freemasons are a closed organization. I was never interested in these matters, but someone might have been a member. We didn't talk about it.

Maxim: So you don't know if anyone from the royal family belonged to the Masons?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Even if someone from your family belongs to Russian Masons, you might not know it either. There are Masons in Russia too!

Maxim: I'll ask a stupid question, but it's on the list. I already asked this question: did you participate in rituals where children were sacrificed and human flesh was eaten?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Maybe only in someone's imagination! For what? Whoever suspects other people of such things, actually wants to participate in it themselves, in my opinion.

Maxim: Thank you.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Most likely, these are psychological traumas that a person drowns out by saying nasty things about others.

Maxim: A very interesting question: were you aware of the events that took place on Epstein's island? And have you personally ever been on this island?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, I was told about it. Including my Charlie. He was there, yes, and he told me about it, but without details, just that there was a celebration, some cruises on yachts around the island, but without going into detail. No, I was never there myself.

Maxim: Thank you.

1:18:23 Spirit of Elizabeth II on archival materials.

Maxim: Are there any ancient books in the British Library that are accessible only to the royal family?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, there is such a department. It mainly stores our genealogies, laws, ancient histories: archival records, chronicles.

Maxim: And does the dynasty of the royal family trace back to an ancient lineage? How ancient is the royal line?

Irina: She shows me now that it's from the 16th century.

Maxim: Thank you.

Did you visit the secret archives of the Vatican with unique artifacts and manuscripts?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I visited the Vatican itself, but I just went to the church and met with cardinals, with the Pope, but I didn't go to the archives.

Maxim: There is a conclusion that the Windsors are supposedly not direct descendants of Richard III, according to DNA analysis. How do you feel about that?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Even if so, it is still no accident that our dynasty ended up on the throne.

Maxim: Clearly not by accident!

1:20:10 Spirit of Elizabeth II on reptilians and doubles on the English throne.

Maxim: We are now moving on to the most interesting, to the "hottest" questions. They may, of course, be fiction, but Princess Diana said that the members of the royal family are not human. There is a theory that the royal family was controlled by reptilians.

Irina (Elizabeth II): You can say anything. I think that her statements were dictated by resentment towards Charlie, who indeed had scandals with her. And why did she say that about me? Because I tried to reason with her, put her in her place, and remind her that she was, after all, married to a prince, that she should behave according to her status. That's why she said that we are not human, that we are controlled by reptilians.

The only thing I can say about reptilians is that in a past life I belonged to a reptilian civilization, but that wasn't even in the previous incarnation, but the one before it. Maybe only in that sense.

Maxim: Maybe people just feel it? And if, let's say, in one of your past lives you were born in a reptilian civilization, could reptilians have become your curators?

Irina: Were reptilians your curators?

(Elizabeth II) I wasn't a contactee.

Maxim: So you don't know, I understand. You can't convey that information.

Irina (Elizabeth II): I had curators, but they were from the Spiritual World. They were my Angel-Consultants.

Maxim: I understand. And did you communicate with your Angel-Consultants?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Unconsciously. They sent me thought-forms, but I took them for my own thoughts.

Maxim: I have another question: did you have doubles who could attend various events at the palace and at many other locations instead of you?

Irina (Elizabeth II): No.

Maxim: You did everything yourself?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes.

Maxim: And there is also information that you died earlier than planned, and a clone ruled instead of you.

Irina (Elizabeth II): On the contrary, later!

Maxim: On the contrary, later.

Irina: "You got it wrong!" – she says. (laughs)

Maxim: Got it wrong, did they? You remained in charge of the state until the end of your days.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes. It was planned to exit the incarnation at 80, but I exited at 96.

Maxim: Since you weren't a contactee, accordingly, the question of whether you had contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations is dropped.

Irina (Elizabeth II): There were no contacts, but I've already told you about what the special services reported.

Maxim: Yes, I remember.

1:23:13 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the results of the incarnation.

Maxim: Tell me, please, having reviewed your incarnation in the Spiritual World, what decisions would you call erroneous? And is there anything you regret?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I did not make any erroneous political decisions. I always tried to harmonize the situation, even when wars started. In the colonies, for example, in Africa, we saved people. That happened when I traveled. I loved traveling by sea even more than flying on airplanes. I loved traveling by sea on a ship.

Once, when we were sailing on a ship not far from the coast of Africa, a message came via communications (shows something like a radio) that an uprising of the local people had broken out in an African colony in one city against the government we had installed there. And we changed course, sailed to that city, even though there was already unrest there, there were armed people, and we evacuated many people from there – children, women, the wounded. I personally placed them, bloody and dirty, in my quarters.

(Irina) Shows that she always tried to come to the rescue. The only thing that prevented her from rising to the 15th spiritual level, as she planned, was her personal grievances.

Maxim: I understand.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Although I had periods in my life when I even reached the 16th level, but then a decrease in vibrations still occurred.

Maxim: And what was the main reason for the decrease in vibrations?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Because of the children. Later, in the last years of my life – and because of the children themselves, and because of their families, relationships with my grandchildren, who were raised incorrectly, giving them too much freedom, freedom to express their will, when they behaved as they wanted and violated the rules of etiquette. I wasn't raised that way, and I was very much against it.

And, of course, before my death, I was very strongly affected by the deterioration of political relations, the relations between states in the world, for example, Russia and Ukraine (shows how she literally fell into despondency).

Maxim: I understand.

What good deeds and actions do you think you did in your life?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I signed documents to give Canada, Malaysia, Indonesia, that is, countries under the British Crown, freer governments. I even encountered opposition in the Houses of Parliament to my orders that freed these countries from some obligations regarding, for example, the sale of goods to the Crown. That is, to make the prices for these goods higher, to reduce taxes. And even the Prime Minister and ministers would reprimand me for being too soft on these issues. I believe I helped the people living in these countries become freer and happier.

Maxim: And how do you think, did your reign have a constructive influence on Great Britain?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I think yes, constructively. I passed the crown to my son, not ashamed of anything regarding my reign. I know that various rumors circulated about me, that they tried to blacken my name, but those were people who either envied me and wanted to be in my place, or those who treated my country, my state with disdain and hatred.

Maxim: I understand.

One second, I have questions in Telegram too.

Yes, by the way, I want to respond – I have a message here: "To the Queen – informal, no respect!" Dear friends, we have already said that we address Spirits informally. If the Queen of Great Britain in the flesh were before me, I would address her formally and in a whisper!

Irina: Another topic: "Britain turned rich India into the poorest country."

(Elizabeth II) But what does that have to do with me? When did India leave the British colonies? Please study history. I wasn't queen then, please address my father!

Maxim: Yes, so don't lay everything on one Queen of Great Britain!

1:29:37 Spirit of Elizabeth II on the next incarnation.

Maxim: Tell me, please, are you planning a next incarnation, and where?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes, I am planning a next incarnation. By the way, I'm interested in incarnating in Russia.

Maxim: It will be very interesting to see you in Russia!

Irina: She shows that she wishes for a female incarnation as well, in a family of doctors involved in medicine, to go in this direction and help people. Precisely in order to definitely develop Love in herself and rise in spiritual level.

1:30:10 Spirit of Elizabeth II on special services and Churchill.

Maxim: And what do you think, these intrigues, scandals, investigations, various covert wars, destruction through influencing other states – whose hands are these? If not yours, let's say, as the monarch of Great Britain, then whose hands could this be?

Irina (Elizabeth II): What exactly?

Maxim: Influence and impact on other countries: revolutions, wars, sponsorship of other influences.

Irina (Elizabeth II): We also have strong special services that have agents all over the world. Of course, they act in the interests of Great Britain. Britain's interests are very simple – for it to be the most powerful. And if its interests are to be the most powerful, that means it wants other countries to be what? That's right, weak. Therefore, weakening other countries is the policy of the special services. Incidentally, the special services of no other country work to strengthen another country. I haven't heard of such!

Maxim: Tell me, please, did you meet Churchill in the Spiritual World?

Maxim: In the Spiritual? No, in the Spiritual World we just communicated mentally, but in the physical, yes, we met.

Maxim: What impression did Churchill make on you?

Irina (Elizabeth II): A smart man, very politically savvy.

(Irina) Shows something like a perch for birds. It's just one, and contenders push each other off it: whoever gets on it will be in charge.

(Elizabeth II) By the way, competition is not only for natural resources, but also for influence in the world, for people's trust, so that it's your country that is socially secure, with low taxes and high wages. And for this, most often, of course, other countries with poorer populations are exploited, who are ready to sell, for example, their minerals, especially oil, at a low price, to provide their people with some minimal benefits, one might say, a piece of bread. And the country that buys from them develops its industry, its production, and due to this raises the standard of living of its population.

Maxim: I thank you.

1:33:25 Recommendations from the Spirit of Elizabeth II for the "Cassiopeia" project.

Maxim: Dear friends, when you write: "There are rumors that Queen Elizabeth and the entire royal establishment are reptilians, reptiles," please watch this broadcast from the very beginning. All the information on this matter is there. We've already said that.

Oh, the most interesting question: how do you yourself feel about our work? You've looked at Irina, me, our egregor – how do you feel about us transmitting information from extraterrestrial civilizations?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Neutrally. I will note that you are simply following the path of, how to put it, opposing the egregors in your country, primarily the egregor of science.

Maxim: But we, on the contrary, want to communicate with scientists and harmonize the information received with the data of our science!

Irina (Elizabeth II): (smiles) You know that there are scientific standards.

Maxim: Yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): What are they?

Maxim: Scientific standards? "Everything that is not proven by science is considered non-existent."

Irina (Elizabeth II): Why? It exists, but is not proven.

Maxim: But not proven, yes.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Look: harmonizing with scientists does not mean that scientists will immediately bend the knee before the "great mind from space."

Maxim: That's understandable!

Irina (Elizabeth II): There must be benefit for science, and it should not be in a call for Love, but in specific changes that can lead to scientific achievements. All science of the physical world is aimed at materialism. And materialism measures only material benefit, not high vibrations: not who has more Love in their heart, but who has more money, who has more power, who has more, if we talk about science, discoveries, grants, accolades, and so on. Do you understand?

Maxim: Yes. Of course, it's offensive in the sense that a large amount of very interesting information for scientists is being transmitted, about which one could talk and discuss.

Irina (Elizabeth II): For materialists, the most interesting information is that which will change their material status to a higher one. I repeat: it's money, power, influence, grants. And information about how to communicate with your Higher Self, how to raise your spiritual level, or how to get in touch with plasmoids, is not interesting to them at all. It's just empty talk for them: they think they will waste valuable time of their lives on things that mean nothing to them – like, for you, some kind of "strength of materials."

Maxim: But then how can we interact with science and scientists?

Irina (Elizabeth II): How to interact? Okay, I will give you recommendations.

Maxim: Thank you!

Irina (Elizabeth II): To avoid conflict, firstly, if you have no scientific evidence for your statements, announce on all your resources: "This is an esoteric opinion, and there is no scientific evidence." This will immediately remove you from the conflict zone regarding opposition to science and the dissemination of pseudoscientific knowledge.

Maxim: "This is an esoteric opinion. There is no scientific evidence"?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Hold on. "All information provided on this channel or in this video is the personal perception of (contactee's last name) and her contacts. There is no scientific proof of this information."

Maxim: Yes, thank you.

Irina (Elizabeth II): This will remove the first edge of the conflict. Second – openness, a call for cooperation.

Maxim: We do this constantly!

Irina (Elizabeth II): But cooperation must come from their side if they are interested. And if not, then just do your thing, having warned people that you are not an organization that contradicts and opposes scientists.

Maxim: I want to openly declare that we are not an organization that contradicts and directly opposes scientists!

Irina (Elizabeth II): Even when you give information that differs from that in earthly science, for example.

Maxim: But that's what we say, that this information comes from extraterrestrial intelligence, from representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations!

Irina (Elizabeth II): It is advisable to add: "There is no scientific evidence."

Maxim: "There is no scientific evidence" – we, in principle, say that. We don't convince anyone of anything.

Irina (Elizabeth II): You need not only to say it, but to place written warnings somewhere.

Maxim: Is that all?

Irina (Elizabeth II): And, of course, to comply with the laws of your state, not to disseminate political statements that could discredit you.

Maxim: We try not to get into politics at all.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Not to manipulate people's feelings to make money from them, and so on. That is, the financial policy must be absolutely transparent.

Maxim: Absolutely transparent financial policy, we don't incline anyone to anything, we don't convince, and we don't offer anything!

Irina (Elizabeth II): Excellent! In that case, you will avoid all possible problems with scientific and state governing bodies. As for contact with science, it's up to them to decide if they are interested – not you.

Maxim: Yes, we can't convince them of anything anyway.

Irina (Elizabeth II): You can only offer, but whether to come into contact with you or not is their free will.

Maxim: I thank you, Elizabeth, for a very interesting broadcast! It's true, there is a large amount of negative information about you in our space.

Irina (Elizabeth II): But they still haven't shown the source of the negative information, as I understand it.

Maxim: Basically, no. I understand perfectly well that there is also a lot of negative information about us being spread in the world without evidence.

Irina: Yes, by the way, that also happens!

Maxim: Yes. And I understand that there is also a lot of unproven, destructive information about you in the media space.

1:40:45 Wish from the Spirit of Elizabeth II to people.

Maxim: I want to sum up our broadcast. What would you like to say or wish to the viewers and listeners of all our channels?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I wish you to pay attention first and foremost to your personal relationships, to your families, to your children – even more than to your work. Because these are your closest people, and if not everything is in order in this area, then in your work there will be complete misunderstanding of where to go and how to move. Without the foundation of family, without your loved ones, it is very difficult for a person to build a career.

Maxim: Yes, that's good advice, by the way!

Irina (Elizabeth II): Without restoring relationships with your parents, with your children, it is very difficult for a person to feel comfortable in any activity in society. Remember that.

1:41:43 Spirit of Elizabeth II on Yeltsin and Gagarin.

Maxim: Listen, did I miss something? Are they bombing Iran already? No one knows? They write: "They are bombing Iran." I'm not aware yet, I hardly watch TV lately, so we'll definitely raise this interesting topic a little later.

Oh, one last question – I forgot to ask, indeed, there was one: did you meet Yuri Gagarin?

Irina (Elizabeth II): Yes. I invited him to my palace.

Maxim: And when at the palace Yuri Gagarin offered to eat the Russian way, in violation of all the rules of etiquette?

Irina (Elizabeth II): I was calm about that. Even when I flew to Russia, and your then current president Boris Yeltsin wanted to help me take off my coat on the street, wanted to hug me – but according to etiquette, it is forbidden to touch the royal person. I, of course, did not allow him to do this, so that later the whole world would not write about him that he violated protocol, and why a person of such level does not know etiquette, receiving a queen in his home. In his Kremlin, that is. I just didn't let him do it. And later, when he served me utensils, made inappropriate jokes, I tried to smooth over this moment.

1:43:09 Attitude of the Spirit of Elizabeth II to fake information.

Maxim: Dear Elizabeth, I thank you for the broadcast! Thank you for your wishes, for your guidance to our Project! And thank you for visiting us and giving our viewers the opportunity to communicate with you.

Irina: Yes, thank you! There's another comment: they wrote that she lies a lot. Can you clarify exactly what she's lying about, and why you think so? We're waiting! (laughs)

Maxim: We're waiting for them to clarify if she lies a lot?

Irina: Well, what is she lying about and why?

Maxim: I understand what they're writing. The writer is questioning that Elizabeth did not participate in special services conspiracies, that she is not a reptilian, because there is a very large amount of such information circulating on the Internet.

Irina (Elizabeth II): Am I lying that I'm not a reptilian?

Maxim: Of course!

Irina (Elizabeth II): Why am I lying that I'm not...

Maxim: Many believe that you are a reptilian.

Irina (Elizabeth II): On what grounds?

Maxim: It is claimed that there is even video, no, not video, but audio recordings, that supposedly you forbid entering a certain room at a certain time of year in Windsor Castle. Such information exists, but I understand it may also be fake.

Irina (Elizabeth II): I myself read in the newspapers that I quarreled with my husband Philip and threw a shoe at him. By the way, I sued for libel.

Maxim: I understand! Dear friends! Whether to believe or not to believe is only for you to decide, we are open to everything. We are absolutely open to you! And if you believe that we communicated with the wrong Elizabeth, or with the wrong Spirit, be sure to write in the comments – we are ready for any criticism.

Irina: That she is not involved in wars – it turns out you are lying, they say.

(Elizabeth II) Okay, write which wars I am involved in and how exactly.

(Irina) So, okay, we'll wait.

Maxim: Dear friends, she already answered that she personally is not involved in wars – it's the special services that specifically "promote" Great Britain. She herself may indeed not have been involved in these wars. You just need to read about monarchs: who monarchs are, what they do, and what their power consists of.

Irina, I suggest we say goodbye.

Irina: Okay, thank you for your questions! Yes, I know that many rumors circulate about Elizabeth II. I was also sent links, I read some articles. By the way, they wrote to me: "Ask this and that." I read about her life, but in the conversation, what was written there was not confirmed.

Dear friends, but they also make negative videos about us – that doesn't mean everything there is true. Only believe yourself, your heart!

Maxim: Your heart! Dear friends, until we meet again, until new broadcasts! Bye everyone!

February 28, 2026

Irina Podzorova – contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, with subtle-material civilizations and with the Spiritual World;
Maxim Rusan – head of the "Cassiopeia" Project and the Center for Spiritual and Physical Development;
Elizabeth II – non-incarnated Spirit of the Queen of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, and the Commonwealth Realms (1952–2022).

Мыслеформы на русском и английском - Thought forms in Russian and English

2033 2150 22 7 70 Абд-ру-шин аборт абсолют абсурд абьюз авария Августин авиация Авиценна Авраам автократия автор авторевизия авторитаризм авторская песня агиография Агни-йога агрессия агрессор ад аддикция азбука азот акаузальность акафист акаша акмеизм актер Акунин акустика Александр Беляев Александр Македонский Александр Меншиков Александр Мень Александр Торик Александр Третий Александрия Алексей Леонов Алексей Романов Алексей Уминский алекситимия алкоголизм Аллах аллегория аллергия Алтай альтернативная история Альцгеймер Альциона Америка аминь анамненис анамнесис анархизм Анастасия Анатолий Собчак ангел ангел-консультант ангел-проводник ангел-пророк ангел-хранитель английский Англия Ангстрем Андрей Десницкий Андрей Зубов Андрей Колесников Андрей Первозванный Андропов Анна Болейн Анна Герман Анна Каренина аномалии антагонист Антарктида антивселенная антигравитатор антигравитация антидот антинорманисты антиутопия Антихрист антология Антон Долин антропогенез антропология антропософия ануннаки апатия Апокалипсис Аполлон апостол Апшетарим арабский Аранья Аресибо арест арии Аристотель Аркаим Арктур аромат артефакт Артикон Архангел архат археология архетип архетипы архив архиепископ архитектура архонт Асгард аскеза Аслан Аспергер астероиды астрал астральные путешествия астрология астрофизика атеизм Атлантида атман атом атомы Атон аутизм аутософология Афганистан Афина Афон Африка аффирмации аффирмация Ахиллес Ахматова ацедия аштар Аштар Шеран Бабаджи Бадицур Байкал Баламут баланс Балтика банкиры баптисты барьер Башар бег беженцы безумный король безусловная любовь Белуха Бергастр Бергсон Берия беседа Беседы со Вселенной бескорыстие бессилие бессмертие Бессознательное бесы Бетховен Бехтерева библеистика Библия бизнес било бинауральные ритмы биография биополе биорезонанс биороботы биофизика биохимия биочип биоэнергетика бисексуальность битва благо благовещение благоговение благодарность благодать благородство благотворительность блаженств-заповеди блины Блок блокада блоки блуд Бог богатство богатырь Богородица богословие божественная искра божественная любовь Боинг болезнь Болотников боль большевизм большевики Большой Брат Большой взрыв Борхес Бразилия Брахма Брежнев Брейгель Бродский Броневой Будда буддизм будущее Булгаков бунт Бурхад Бурятия Вавилон Вавилонская башня вакуум вальдорфская педагогика Вальхалла Ван Гог Ванга варака варны варяги Василий Сталин Васту Ватикан вдохновение Вебер вегетарианство ведическая Русь веды Велес великаны Великий инквизитор Вельзевул Венера вера Ветхий Завет вечность взросление вибрации визуализация виманы вина вирус вирусы витамины Влад Воробьев Владикавказ Владимир Владимир Гольдштейн Властелин колец власть внетелесные переживания внимание внутренний эмигрант вода водородная бомба возмездие вознесение воин воин Света война Воланд Волга волны Волошин волхв волхвы воля воображение воплощение вопросы Воронеж воскресение воспитание восстание враг время Врил Вселенная ВсеЯСветная Грамота вслух выбор выгода Высоцкий Высшее Я выученная беспомощность Габышев Гавриил Гагарин гаджет галактика Галилей Галина Юзефович Гамельн Гамлет Ганеша гармонизация гармония Гарри Поттер Гаряев гегемон Гедеон гедонизм генетика гениальность гений гений места Геннадий Крючков генотип Генри Модсли Генрих VIII геология геометрия геополитика Георгий Жуков Георгий Победоносец Германия герменевтика Гермес Гермес Трисмегист геронтология Герцен гестапо гибридизация гибридная литература гибриды гибрис гигиена гидронимы Гиза Гильгамеш Гипатия Гиперборея гипноз гири Гитлер Гихор глаголица гладиаторы глоссолалии глухота гнев гнозис Гоголь голограмма голограммы голодание голос Гомер гомосексуальность Гор Горбачев Гордиев узел гордыня горе Горный Алтай государство Грааль гравитация гражданская война Граль гранты Грёнинг грех грехопадение Греция греческий Гриар Мурати Григорий Журавлев Григорий Нисский Грин Грузия групповой разум Гумилёв Гурджиев ГФС Да Давид Давид-царь Даждьбог даймон Даниил Даниил Андреев Данте дар по сердцу Дараал дарвинизм дарение Даррил Анка демон деньги детектив Деяния апостолов Джабраил Джейн Остин джихад Джобс Джон Леннон Джонатан Руми дзен Дзержинский диабет диалог диалоги Диана дизайн диктатура Димон динозавры Дионис дипломатия Дисару диссидент диссоциация дисциплина Дмитрий Глуховский дневник дневники ДНК доверие доктор Киртан докудрама документальный фильм долг долголетие доллар Долорес Кэннон домовой Дон донат донос Достоевский достоинство Драко дракон драконовые драматург Древняя Русь Другой дружинник Дудь дух дух места духи природы духовная практика духовное сердце духовность духовные упражнения духовный мир духовный рост душа душевное дуэль ДЦП дыхание дьявол Дэн Браун Дятлов Евангелие Евгений Онегин Европа евхаристия Египет Елабуга Елена Блаватская Елена Ксионшкевич Елена Равноапостольная Елена Рерих Елизавета Вторая Ельцин Ереван Ерма Есенин Ефрем Сирин жадность жалость Жанна д’Арк желания женственность женщины жертва жертвоприношение жестокость Живаго Живая Этика живопись живопсь животные жизненная сила жир Жириновский житие жкт жречество жрица Жуков журналистика Жюль Верн зависимость зависть завоеватель заговор загробная жизнь Задкиил закон Залиатар Заменгоф запах записки у изголовья заповеди застой засуха звездный десант звезды Звенящие кедры России зверь звук звукосвет звукотерапия Звягинцев здоровье Зевс землетрясения Земля зеркало зиккурат злаковые зло змееборец зодиак Зона 51 Зорге Зороастр Зосима зрелость Иаков Ибрахим Иван Давыдов Иван Ефремов иго игра Игра престолов игромания идеология Иегова иезуиты Иерусалим Иешуа избранное Избранные Изида изнасилование изобилие изобретатель изоляция Израиль изумление ИИ ИИ-комментарии ИИ-портрет ИИ-расследование ИИ-рецензии ИИ-соавторы ИИстории Иисус икона иконопись Илиада иллюзии Илья Муромец иммунитет империя импринт импульс имя индивидуация индиго-дети Индия индоктринация индуизм инициация инквизиция инопланетяне инстинкт институты интеграция интервью интернет-радио Интерстеллар интроспекция интуиция инфекции информация Ио Иоанн Богослов Иоанн Зедазнийский Иоанн Креста Иоанн Креститель Иоанн Кронштадтский ионизация Иосиф Иосиф Обручник Иосия Иран Ирина Богушевская Ирина Подзорова Иса Исида искупление искусственный интеллект искусство искушение ислам испанский исповедь истина историософия история источник Исход исцеление исчезновение Иуда иудаизм Йемен йети йога каббала Кавказ казаки казнь Каиафа Кайрос Как как вверху-так и внизу Калачакра календарь Кали каллиграфия камень камлание Камчатка Камю канцерогены капитализм капсула Карадаг кардиология Карибский кризис карма Кармический Совет Каролина Нойбер Карпман Касси Кассиопея катаклизмы каталог катаракта катарсис катастрофа катахреза католицизм каторга Катунь катушка Квадрат Пифагора квант квантовый переход КГБ Кейси кельты Кеннеди кенозис Керчь кибернетика Киев Киммерия кино Кирилл кириллица Киртан Кирхитон киста Кит Оатли Китай Китайская стена китайский классика клевета Клеопатра климакс Климент Александрийский клиническая психология книжный критик князь ковчег Коктебель коллекции коллекционирование колокол колониализм Колумб Коляда кома Комаров коммунизм коммуникация композитор Конан Дойл конгломерат Конкордия Антарова Константин Великий контакт контактеры контроль конфедерация конфликтология концлагерь кораблекрушение Коран королева корона коррупция космизм космическая опера космогенез космогония космология космонавтика космос космохилинг космоэнергетика кот кошки Кощей кража Крайон красный красота креационизм кредиты кремация кремний крещение кристалл кристаллы Крит Кришна кровь Кронос круги Крым Крысолов Ксения Петербургская ксенофобия Кузнецова Кузьма Минин Куликовская битва культ культура кураторы Курилов Курукшетра Ла-Ор-Шми лабиринт лаванда ладан Лазарь ЛДПР лев Левиафан левитация легенды Лемурия Ленин лента времени лень Леонардо Леонардо да Винчи Лермонтов летопись летчик Ли Кэрролл лидерство Лилит лиминальность лингвогенез Линкольн Липецк Лира Литва литература лицемерие лицо ЛиШиони Лобсанг Рампа Логос логотерапия ложь Лойола лояльность ЛСД Лука Лука Крымский Луна Льюис любовь Лювар Лютер Люцифер лярвы магия магнитосфера магниты Майкл Ньютон майорат макрофилософия Максим Броневский Максим Русан максима Малайзия Малахия Маленький принц мамонты манвантара Мандельштам манифест манифестация мантия мантры ману Манускрипт Войнича маньяк Мардук Марина Макеева Марина Попович Мария Мария Магдалина Мария Оршич Мария Степанова Мария-Антуанетта Марк Аврелий Марк Антоний Маркс марксизм Марс Мартин Мархен маршал масла масонство масоны массы Мастер и Маргарита мат математика материализация материализм материя Матрица Бурхада матрицы Матрона Московская мать мать Тереза Махабхарата Махно машина времени Маяковский мегалиты Мегре медиакуратор медитация медиумические сеансы международный язык Межзвездный союз Мейстер Экхарт меланома Мелхиседек мемы менеджер менопауза меридианы Меркурий Мерлин Мерси мертвое мерцание Мессинг места силы месть метаистория метанойя метарецензИИ Метатрон метафизика метафора метемпсихоз миграция МидгасКаус микробиом микрофлора миллиардер милосердие милость минимализм минотавр миоцен мир мироздание мирра Миррах Каунт миссионер миссия мистерия миф мифология мифос Михаил Шишкин Михаил-архангел Млечный путь Мнемозина мозг Моисей Мокошь молитва молчание Мона Лиза монархия монастырь монашество монголы монотеизм Мориа морфий Мохенджо-Даро Моцарт мудрость музы музыка мумии Муму мурлыканье Мухаммед мученичество мыслепакеты мыслеформы мысль мытарства Мышкин мышление Мэрилин Монро Мэтт Фрейзер Мюллер мясоедение наблюдатель Навуходоносор Навь Нагорная проповедь надежда Назарий Накшбанд намерение наночипы Наполеон наркотики Нарния нарциссизм насилие настрои Наталья Громова наука нацизм Небесный Отец неврология независимость Незнакомка нейроакустика нейробиология нейродетекция нейронаука нейроны нейропластичность нейротеология нейрофидбек нейрофизиология нейтрино нелюбовь немецкий ненависть неоклассика неоязычество Нефертити нефть Нибиру низковибрационные Николай Коляда Николай Чудотворец Николай II Никто Нил Армстронг Нимрод Ницше НКВД НЛО НЛП новояз Новый Завет Ноев ковчег Нолан ноосфера норманисты ноцебо ночь нравы нумерология нуминозное О'Донохью обесценивание обида обитель обман обожение образность образование ОВЗ огонь Один одиночество Одиссея ожирение озарение Ока океан оккультизм оккупация Олимп Ольга Ольга Примаченко Ольга Седакова омоложение онгон онкология онтология опера оплата оплата по сердцу опора органы Ориген Орион орки Ортега-и-Гассет Оруэлл Орфей Освальд освобождение Осирис Оскар осознанность осознанные сновидения остеопороз осуждение ответственность отец отравление отречение отчаяние Отче наш охота охранитель Ошо Павел Павел Басинский Павел Таланкин падение Паисий Святогорец палеоконтакт палеонтология памятники память Пангея паника панспермия Пантелеймон папство пар парадигма паразиты паралич параллельная реальность параллельные тексты параллельный мир паскаты Пасха патриарх патриотизм педагогика педофилия пение Первая мировая перевод Пересвет пересказ перестройка перинатальность персонализм Перун песни песня Петр Пётр Первый Петр I Петрозаводск печаль пиар Пикран пилот Пиноккио пирамиды писатель письма письменность Пифагор плазмоиды Платон плащаница плен Плеяды пловец плотность побег победа подростки подросток подсознание позвоночник покаяние покой Полдень поле политика полифония полнота Полынь помазание поместье Помпадур помышления Понтий Пилат поп-аффирмации порог портал порталы портрет португальский посвящение Последнее слово последствия послушание поток потоп потребление похудение Почему пошлость поэзия поэт правда правитель православие Правь праиндоевропейцы практика прана праязык преданность предательство предназначение предначертание предопределение предсказания предубеждение прелесть преображение преследователь привязка приматы примирение принцесса принятие природа присутствие притча притчи причастие причащение причина пришельцы проводник прогнозирование прогнозы прогресс прогрессоры проекция прозрение проказа прокрастинация Проматерь Прометей промысел пропаганда проповедь Пропп пророк пророчество пространство протестантизм протоиерей профилактика прощение псалмы псалом психиатрия психоанализ психогигиена психодрама психодуховность психоид психолог психология психоматрица психопатия психопрактика психосоматика психотерапия психотравма психофизика психоэнергетика Птаах ПТСР Пугачёв путешествия во времени путь путь героя Пушкин пьеса пьесы пятерка Пятидесятница раб рабство Рагнарёк радиация радио Радостная весть радость разведка раздражительность Разин различение размножение разрешение разум рак ранние христиане Раом Тийан Раомли РАС раскаяние раскрытие Распутин распятие рассказы расследование расстановки расстрел рассудок растения расы Рафаил реабилитация реальность ребёнок ребенок внутренний реваншизм революция регенерация регрессия Редактор режиссер резонанс реинкарнация Рейки реки религиоведение религия репрессии рептилоид рептилоиды Рерих ресурс ретрит реформация рецензии речь ридер Рим Рио риски Риурака РНК Роберт Бартини Роберт Монро роботы род родители родовая карма Роза мира Розуэлл Роксолана Рокфеллер роль Романовы Россия росы Ротшильд Рудольф Штайнер руны русалки русская душа русская литература Русская правда русская рулетка русское Русь рыбалка Рюрик Рязань С.В.Жарникова Савская сад садизм сакральная геометрия Салтыков-Щедрин Сальвадор Дали самоанализ самозанятые самоосуждение самооценка самопожертвование самопознание самопрощение саморазвитие самосозерцание самосохранение самость самоубийство Самуил-пророк сандал Санкт-Петербург сансара санскрит Сант Тхакар Сингх саркофаг сатана сатира Сатурн Сатья Саи Баба саундтрек саундтреки Сахара Сахаров Сварог свет Световая Сеть Галактики свеча свидетель свидетельство свобода свобода воли Святая Земля святой Святой Дух Святослав Святославичи святость Святые духи сдвиг полюсов сейсмология секс Селбет семейные расстановки семиозис семья Сен-Жермен сепарация Серафим Саровский Сергей Булгаков Сергий Радонежский сердце Серебряный век серебряный возраст серендипность сериал серийный убийца серые Сет сефироты Сибирь Сигма Сиддхартха Гаутама СИИ-ХА символ веры символизм символы Симон Киринеянин Симона де Бовуар синергия синкретизм синтез синхронистичность синхроничность Сириус сирота сифилис сказка сказки скепсис скифы склероз Скорсезе скука слабость Славь славяне сладкое слепота словарь слово служение случайность смерть смирение смысл снежный человек сновидения соавтор собрание сочинений совесть советское совпадения сожаление созависимость создатели созидание сознание Солнечная система солнце Соловки Соломон сон Сорос сострадание сотериология софия социализм Союз Шести Союз-1 спазм Спартак спасатель спецслужбы СПИД спина Спиридон Тримифунтский спиритизм спиритуализм спокойствие справедливость сравнение сребролюбие СССР стадность Сталин сталинизм Сталкер Станислав Гроф старение старец статистика Стефан стихии стоицизм стокгольмский синдром сторителлинг страдание страж страсть страх Стрелеки стресс стрессоустойчивость строитель Стругацкие студенты стыд стяжательство субъектность суверенитет суд судьба суждение суицид Сулейман султан супервизия суфизм Сфинкс схоластика сценарий счастье сын Сэй Сёнагон Сэфестис тайна такт тамплиеры танатос Тарковский Таро Татиана тату Татьяна Вольтская Татьяна Малкина Татьяна Яблонская Тау Кита Тау-Кита Ташиг творение Творец творчество театр тезисы Тейяр де Шарден телеграм телеология телепатия телепортация тело темная материя темнота тень теодицея теозис теология теософия терапия термоядерное оружие террор Тесла тессеракт технологии Тибет тибетские чаши тиран Тисульская принцесса Титаник титаны Тихий океан Тихон тишина Тия Александер Толкиен Толстой тонкоматериальный топонимика Тора торговля торсионные поля тоска Тот тоталитаризм Точка Омега травма травматология Трамп транс трансмиграция трансперсональность трансплантология трансформация трансценденция тревога трепет Третья мировая война трещина триггеры трикстер триллер Троица троичный код трон Троцкий Троянская война трусость Тумесоут Тургай Тутмос Тухачевский тьма Тюдоры Тюмос убеждения убийство уборка угодник удача удивление ужас Узбекистан Украина уныние Уолш управление Уриил уровни духовного мира урожай уроки духовные Усидур успех усталость усыновление уфология Фаддей фальсифицируемость фантастика фантом фараон фасция фатализм фашизм Фаэтон феи феминизм феозис Ферзен Феху физика Филадельфийский эксперимент фильтры финансы фиолетовое пламя Фисмор фитотерапия флейта флотация фокус фольклор Франкл Франциск Ассизский Франция французский Фредди Меркьюри Фрейд фурии футурология фэнтези фэншуй Хаксли хаос харизма Хатшепсут Хеллингер хиджаб химтрейлы хинди хиромантия Хирон хирург хлысты Хокинг Холмс холодная война холотропность христианство Христос христосознание хроника Хроники Акаши хронология Хрущев художественный перевод художник царица царь цвет Цветаева цветомузыка Цезарь целительство цензура Центавр-А церковь цивилизация цигун Циолковский цитаты цифры Цицерон ЦРУ Чайковский чакры частота человек человечность ченнелинг Чернобыль черные дыры Черчилль честь Чехов Чечня Чикатило Чиксентмихайи Чингисхан чип чипирование числа числовые коды чистота чтение чувства чудо Чюрлёнис Шайма Шакьямуни шаман шаманизм шамбала шантаж шахид Шварц Швейцария Шекспир Шентрикусса шестьдесят шизофрения Шику Шавьер Шимор школа Школа контактеров Шлосберг Шри Чинмой шумеры Эвмениды эволюция эвтаназия эго эгоизм эгрегор Эдем эзотерика Эйзенхауэр экзегеза Экзюпери экология экономика эксперимент экспертиза экспертность экстаз экуменизм электронные книги элита эмбиент эмигрант эмиграция Эмили Уилсон Эммануэль эмоции эмоциональный интеллект эмпатия Энгельс энергии энергия энергогигиена энергоматематика энергомедицина энергообмен энтропия энциклопедия эпектасис эпигенетика эпиграф эпилепсия эпифания эпифеномен эпос эпохе Эринии Эслер эсперанто эссе эстетика эсхатология этика этимология Эфиопия эфир эфирное тело эфирные масла эфирные матрицы эфирные энергии Эфрон эффективность Эхнатон эшафот ЭЭГ Юлиана Нориджская Юлия Рейтлингер юмор Юнг Юпитер Юрий Долгорукий юродивый Я ЕСМЬ Явь ядерные ракеты ядерный взрыв язык языки язычество Яйцо да Винчи Ян Гус Япония Ярослав Мудрый ясность Яхве A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms Abd-ru-shin abortion Abraham absolute absurd abundance abuse acausality acceptance accident acedia Achilles Acmeism acoustics actor Acts of the Apostles addiction adoption aesthetics affirmation affirmations Afghanistan Africa Afterlife agency aggression aggressor AGI aging Agni Yoga AI AI co-authors AI reviews AI-co-authours AI-commentaries AI-investigation AI-literature AI-portrait AI-reviews AIDS akasha Akashic Records Akhenaten Akhmatova Akunin alcoholism Alcyonе Alcyone Alexander Belyaev Alexander III Alexander Men' Alexander Menshikov Alexander the Great Alexander Torik Alexandria Alexei Leonov Alexei Romanov Alexey Uminsky alexithymia alien base aliens Allah allegory allergy aloud Altai Altai Mountains alternative history Alzheimer's Amazochi ambient amen America Anam Cara anamnesis anarchism Anastasia Anatoly Sobchak ancestral karma ancestry Ancient Rus Ancient Rus' Andrei Desnitsky Andrei Kolesnikov Andrei Zubov Andrey Zubov Andropov angel angel-consultant angel-guide angel-prophet anger Ångström anguish animals Anna German Anna Karenina Anne Boleyn annunciation anointing anomalies antagonist Antarctica anthology anthropogenesis anthropology anthroposophy anti-gravitator anti-gravity anti-normanists anti-universe Antichrist antidote antigravity Anton Dolin Anunnaki anxiety apathy Apocalypse Apollo apostasy apostle Apple Apshetarim Arabic Aranya archaeology archangel Archangel Archangel Michael archbishop archetype archetypes architecture archive archon Archpriest Arcturus Area 51 Arecibo arhat Aristotle ark Arkaim aroma arrest art Articon artifact artificial intelligence artist aryans as above - so below ascension asceticism ASD Asgard Ashtar Ashtar Sheran Aslan Asperger's asteroids astral astral journeys astral plane astral travel astral travels astrology astronautics astrophysics Aten atheism Athena Athos Atlantis Atman atom atoms atonement attachment attention attunements Augustine author author's song authoritarianism authour autism autocracy autosophology avarice aviation Avicenna awareness awe Axel von Fersen Babaji Babylon back Baditsur Baikal balance ball lightning Baltic bankers baptism baptists bard music barrier Bashar battle Battle of Kulikovo beast beatitudes beauty Beelzebub Beethoven Bekhtereva belief beliefs bell Belukha benefit Bergastr Bergson Beria betrayal Bible Biblicism Big Bang Big Brother Bigfoot billionaire binaural beats bio-robots biochemistry biochip bioenergetics biofield biography biophysics bioresonance bisexuality black holes blackmail blindness blockade blocks Blok blood body Boeing bogatyr Bolotnikov Bolsheviks bolshevism boredom Borges Brahma brain Brazil breath breathing Brezhnev Brodsky Bronevoy Bruegel Buddah Buddhism builder Bulgakov Burhad Burhad Matrix Burkhad Buryatia business Caesar Caiaphas calendar calligraphy Camus cancer candle capitalism capsule captivity carcinogens cardiology Caroline Neuber Cassie Cassiopeia cat catachresis cataclysms catalogue cataract catastrophe catharsis Catholicism Caucasus cause Cayce celts censorship Centaurus-A cereals cerebral palsy chain chakras chance channeling channelling chaos charisma charity Chechnya Chekhov chemtrails Chernobyl Chico Xavier Chikatilo child China Chinese chip chipping Chiron choice Christ christ-consciousness christianity chronicle chronology church Churchill CIA Cicero Cimmeria cinema circles Čiurlionis Civil War civilization clan clarity classical music Claude.ai cleaning Clement of Alexandria Cleopatra climacteric clinical psychology coauthour codependency coincidences Cold War collected works collecting colonialism color colour-music Columbus coma commandments communication communion communism comparison compassion composer Conan Doyle concentration camp Concordia Antarova condemnation conduit confederation confession conflictology conglomerate conqueror conscience consciousness consequences conspiracy Constantine the Great constellations consumption contact contactees contrition control conversation Conversations with the Universe coronavirus corruption cosmism cosmoenergetics cosmoenergy cosmogenesis cosmogony Cosmohealing cosmology cosmonautics cosmos Cossacks court covetousness cowardice crack creation creationism creativity Creator creators creed cremation Crete Crimea Cronus crop circles crossover crown crucifixion cruelty crystal crystals Csikszentmihalyi Cuban Missile Crisis cult culture curators cybernetics Cyril Cyrillic script cyst Da Vinci Egg daimon Dan Brown Daniel Daniil Andreev Dante Daraal dark matter darkness Darryl Anka Darwinism David David-King Dazhbog dead deafness death debt deceit DeepSeek deification demon density denunciation design desires despair despondency destiny detective devaluation devil diabetes dialogue dialogues Diana diaries diary dictatorship digits dignity Dimon dinosaurs Dionysus diplomacy director disabilities disappearance Disaru disaster discernment disciples discipline disclosure disease dissident dissociation divine divine love divine spark Dmitry Glukhovsky DNA Doctor Kirtan docudrama documentary dollar Dolores Cannon Don donation Dostoevsky Dr.Kirtan Draco Draconians dragon dragon-slayer Dragonians dreams drought drugs druzhinnik Dud duel Dyatlov Dyatlov pass incident dystopia Dzerzhinsky early Christians Earth earthquakes Easter ebooks ecology economics ecstasy ecumenism Eden Editor education EEG efficiency Efron ego egoism egregor egregore Egypt Eisenhower elder electricity elements Elena Ksionshkevich elite Elizabeth II embodiment emigrant emigration émigré Emily Wilson Emmanuel emotional intelligence emotions empathy empire encyclopedia enemy energies energy energy exchange energy hygiene energy medicine energy-mathematics Engels England English entropy envy epektasis epic epigenetics epigraph epilepsy epiphany epiphenomenon Epochē epub erinyes escape eschatology ESL Esler esotericism esoterics Esperanto essay essays essential oils estate eternity ether etheric body etheric energies etheric matrices ethics Ethiopia etiquette etymology eucharist Eugene Onegin eumenides Europe euthanasia evil evolution excess weight excitement execution exegesis Exodus experiment expertise extraterrestrials Exupéry face Facebook fairies fairy tale fairy tales faith fall falsifiability family family constellations fantasy fascia fascism fasting fat fatalism fate father fatigue fear feelings Fehu feline femininity feminism Feng Shui fiction field filters final statement finance finances fine-material fire fishing five flickering Flood flotation flow flute focus folklore forecasting forecasts Foremother Forgiveness fork fornication fortune fragrance France Francis of Assisi frankincense Frankl Freddie Mercury free will freedom Freemasonry freemasons French frequency Freud fullness Furies future Futurology Gabriel Gabyshev gadget Gagarin Galactic Light Network galaxy Galileo Galina Yuzefovich gambling game Game of Thrones Ganesha garden Gariaev gastroenterology genetics Genghis Khan genius genius loci Gennady Kryuchkov genotype Genspark.ai geology geometry geopolitics George the Victorious Georgia Georgy Zhukov German Germany gerontology gestapo GFL GFS giants Gideon gift by heart gifting Gihor Gilgamesh giving Giza gladiators Glagolitic script glossary glossolalia gnosis God Gogol good Good news Gorbachev Gordian knot Gospel governance grace Grail grants gratitude gravity Grays Great Wall of China Greece greed Greek gregariousness Gregory of Nyssa Greys Griar Murati grief Grigory Zhuravlyov Grin Gröning group consciousness guardian Guardian Angel guilt Gumilеv Gurdjieff hagiography Hamelin Hamlet happiness hard labor harmonization harmony Harry Potter harvest hatred Hatshepsut Hawking healing health heart heart-based donation heartfelt payment Heavenly Father hedonism hegemon Helena Blavatsky Helena Roerich Helena-mother of Constantine I hell Hellinger Henry Maudslay Henry VIII herd mentality Hermas hermeneutics Hermes Hermes Trismegistus hero's path Herzen hierarchy Higher Self hijab Hindi Hinduism historiosophy history Hitler holiness Holmes hologram holograms holotropism holy fool Holy Land Holy Spirit Holy Spirits Homer Homo sapiens homosexuality honor hope horror Horus house spirit How human humanity humility humor hunting Huxley hybrid literature hybridization hybrids hybris hydrogen bomb hydronyms hygiene Hypatia Hyperborea hypnosis hypocrisy I AM Ibrahim Icarus icon icon painting ideology Iliad illness illusions Ilya Muromets imagery imagination immortality immunity imprint impulse incarnation incense independence India Indigo children individuation indoctrination infections information initiation inner child inquisition insight inspiration instinct instincts institutions integration intellect intelligence Intelligence agencies intention internal émigré international language internet radio Interstellar Interstellar union interview introspection intuition inventor investigation Io ionization Iran Irina Bogushevskaya Irina Podzorova irritability Isa Isis Islam isolation Israel IStories Ivan Davydov Ivan Yefremov James Jan Hus Jane Austen Japan Jebrail Jehovah Jerusalem Jesuits Jesus Jibra'il Jibrail Jibril jihad Joan of Arc Jobs John Lennon John of Kronstadt John of the Cross John of Zedazeni John the Baptist John the Theologian Jonathan Roumie Joseph Joseph the Betrothed Josiah journalism journey joy judaism Judas judgment Jules Verne Julia Reitlinger Julian of Norwich Jung Jupiter justice Kabbalah Kairos Kalachakra Kali Kamchatka kamlanie Karadag karma Karmic Council Karpman Katun keeper Keith Oatley Kennedy kenosis Kerch KGB Khlysts Khrushchev kin king King David Kirhiton Kirtan Koktebel Kolyada Komarov Koschei Koshchei Krishna Kronos Kryon Kurilov Kurukshetra Kuzma Minin Kuznetsova Kyiv La-Or-Shmi labyrinth language languages larvas lavender law Lazarus laziness LDPR leadership learned helplessness Lee Carroll legends Lemuria Lenin Leonardo Leonardo da Vinci leprosy Lermontov letters levels of the spiritual world Leviathan levitation Lewis liberation lie lies light Light Network of the Galaxy Lilith liminality Lincoln lineage linguogenesis lion Lipetsk LiShioni literary critic literary translation literature Lithuania Living Ethics loans Lobsang Rampa Logos logotherapy loneliness longevity longing Lord's Prayer love low-vibrational loyalty Loyola LSD lucid dreaming Lucifer luck Luke Luke of Crimea Luther Luwar Lyra macrophilosophy mad king magic magnetosphere Mahabharata Makhno Malachi Malaysia mammoths Man manager Mandelstam maniac manifestation manifesto mantle mantras manu manvantara Marcus Aurelius Marduk Maria Oršić Maria Stepanova Marie Antoinette Marilyn Monroe Marina Makeeva Marina Makeyeva Marina Popovich Mark Antony Markhen Mars marshal Martin martyrdom Marx Marxism Mary Mary Magdalene masons masses materialism materialization mathematics matrices Matrona of Moscow Matt Fraser matter maturation maturity maxim Maxim Bronevsky Maxim Rusan Mayakovsky meaning meat-eating media curator mediacurator meditation mediumistic sessions mediumship sessions megaliths Megre Meister Eckhart melanoma Melchizedek memes memory menopause mental tranquility Mercury mercy meridians Merlin mermaids Mersi Messing metahistory metAI-reviews metanoia metaphor metaphysics Metatron metempsychosis MH370 Michael Newton Michael the Archangel Michael-archangel microbiome microflora MidgasKaus migration Mikhail Shishkin Milky Way mind mindfulness minimalism Minotaur Miocene miracle Mirrah Kaunt Mirrakh Count mirror mission missionary Mnemosyne modern classical Mohenjo-Daro Mokosh Mona Lisa monarch monarchy monastery monasticism money Mongol monotheism monuments Moon morals morphine Morya Moses mother Mother of God Mother Teresa Mozart Muhammad Müller multiverse mummies Mumu murder muse music myrrh Myshkin mystery myth mythology mythos name nanochips Napoleon Naqshband narcissism Narnia Natalia Gromova nature nature spirits Nav Nazarius nazism NB NDE Nebuchadnezzar Nefertiti Neil Armstrong neo-paganism neoclassical neoclassical music neuroacoustics neurobiology neurodetection neurofeedback neurology neurons neurophysiology neuroplasticity neuroscience neurotheology neutrinos New age new age music New Testament newspeak Nibiru Nicholas II Nicholas the Wonderworker Nietzsche night Nikolai Kolyada Nimrod nitrogen NKVD NLP No One Noah's Ark nobility nocebo Nolan Non-Love Noon noosphere normanists nostalgia nuclear explosion nuclear missiles numbers numerical codes numerology numinous O'Donohue obedience obesity observer occultism occupation ocean Odin Odyssey oil oils Oka Old Testament Olga Olga Primachenko Olga Sedakova Olympus Omdaru Omdaru literature Omdaru Literature Omdaru radio Omega Point oncology ongon ontology opera orcs organs Origen Orion orphan Orpheus Ortega y Gasset Orthodoxy Orwell Oscar Osho Osiris osteoporosis Oswald Other out-of-body experiences Pacific Ocean paganism pain painting Paisios of Mount Athos paleocontact paleontology palmistry pancakes Pangea panic panspermia Pantaleon papacy parable parables paradigm parallel reality parallel texts parallel world paralysis parasites parents Paschats passion path patriarch patriotism Paul Paula Welden Pavel Basinsky Pavel Talankin Pax Americana payment peace pedagogy pedophilia penal servitude Pentecost perestroika Peresvet perinatality permission slip persecutor personalism Perun Peter Peter the Great Petrozavodsk Phaethon Phaeton phantom pharaoh Philadelphia Experiment Phismor physics phytotherapy Pied Piper Pikran pilgrim pilot Pinocchio pity placebo places of power plants plasmodoids plasmods plasmoid plasmoids plasmonids Plato play plays playwright pleaser of God Pleiades poet poetry poisoning pole shift politics polyphony Pompadour Pontius Pilate pop-affirmations portal portals portrait Portugese power powerlessness PR practice prana Prav prayer predestination predetermination prediction predictions prejudice presence prevention pride priestess priesthood primates primogeniture Primordial Mother prince princess procrastination profanity progress progressors projection Prometheus propaganda prophecy prophet Propp protestantism proto-indo-european Proto-Indo-Europeans proto-language providence psalm psychiatry psychic psychoanalysis psychodrama psychoenergetics psychohygiene psychoid psychologist psychology psychomatrix psychopathy psychophysics psychopractice psychosomatics psychospirituality psychotherapy psychotrauma Ptah PTSD Pugachev purity purpose purring Pushkin Putin pyramid pyramides pyramids Pythagoras qigong quantum quantum transition queen questions quotes Quran races radiation radio Radio-Serendipity Ragnarok Raom Tijaan Raom Tiyan Raom-Li rape Raphael Rasputin Razin reader reading reality reason rebellion reconciliation recovery red redemption reformation refugees regeneration regress regression regret rehabilitation Reiki reincarnation rejuvenation relics religion religious studies repentance repressions reproduction reptiles reptilian reptilians rescuer resentment resonance resource responsibility resurrection retelling retreat retribution revanchism revenge reverence reviews revolt revolution Ringing Cedars of Russia risks Riuraka rivers RNA Robert Bartini Robert Monroe robots Rockefeller Roerich role Rome Rose of the World Roswell Rosy Rothschild Roxelana RU-EN Rudolf Steiner ruler runes running Rurik Rus Rus' Russia Russian russian history Russian literature Russian roulette Russian soul Russkaya Pravda Ryazan S.V.Zharnikova sacred geometry sacrifice sadism Sahara saint Saint Petersburg Saint-Germain Sakharov Saltykov-Shchedrin Salvador Dali salvation samsara Samuel-prophet sandalwood Sanskrit Sant Thakar Singh sarcophagus satan Sathya Sai Baba satire Saturn scaffold scent schizophrenia scholasticism school School of Contactees Schwartz science science fiction sclerosis Scorsese Screwtape script scythians séances Sefestis sefirot Sei Shōnagon seismology Selbet selected Self self-condemnation self-contemplation self-development self-disdain self-employed self-esteem self-forgiveness self-killing self-knowledge self-preservation self-revision self-sacrifice selfishness selflessness semantron semiosis separation Seraphim of Sarov serendipity serfdom Sergei Bulgakov Sergius of Radonezh serial killer series sermon Sermon on the Mount sermons service Seth sex shadow shahid Shaima Shakespeare Shakyamuni shaman shamanism Shambhala shame Sheba Shentrikussa Shimor shipwreck Shlosberg short story Shroud of Turin Siberia Siddhardha Gautama Sigma SII-KHA silence silicon Silver Age Simon of Cyrene Simone de Beauvoir sin singing Sirius sixty skepticism slander Slav slave slavery Slavs sleep SLOVO smell socialism Solar System Solomon Solovki son song songs Sophia Sorge Soros sorrow soteriology soul sound sound therapy sound-light soundtrack soundtracks source sovereignty soviet Soyuz-1 space space opera Spanish Spartacus spasm special needs speech Sphinx spine spirit spirit of place spirit of the place spiritism Spirits of nature spiritual delusion spiritual exercises spiritual growth spiritual heart spiritual lessons spiritual practice spiritual world spiritualism spirituality Spyridon of Trimythous Square of Pythagoras Sri Chinmoy St. Ephraim the Syrian St.Andrew stagnation Stalin Stalinism Stalker Stanislav Grof stars state statistics steam Stephen Stockholm syndrome stoicism stone stories storytelling Stranger Strelecky stress stress resistance Strugatsky brothers students subconscious substance use disorder subtle-material success suffering Sufism suicide Suleiman sultan sumerians sun supervision support surgeon surprise Svarog Svyatoslav Svyatoslavichi sweets swimmer Switzerland symbolism symbols synchronicity syncretism synergy synthesis syphilis tact Tarkovsky Tarot Tashig Tatiana Tatiana Malkina Tatiana Voltskaya tattoo Tatyana Yablonskaya Tau Ceti Tchaikovsky technologies technology teenager Teilhard de Chardin telegram teleology telepathy teleportation Templars temptation terror Tesla tesseract testimony Thaddeus thanatos The Beatles The Brothers Karamazov The Grand Inquisitor The House of Romanov The Idiot The Little Prince The Lord of the Rings The Master and Margarita The Omdaru Literature Anthology The Pillow Book The Self The Star mission Thea Alexander theater theatre TheChosen theft theodicy theology theosis theosophy Theotokos therapy thermonuclear weapon theses thinking Thoth thought thought-forms thoughts threshold thriller throne Thutmose thymos Tibet Tibetan bowls Tikhon time time machine time ribbon time travel timeline Tisul Princess Titanic Titans Tolkien tollhouses Tolstoy toponymy Torah torsion fields totalitarianism Tower of Babel trade trance tranquility transcendence transfiguration transformation translation transmigration transpersonal transpersonality transplantology trauma traumatology trial trickster triggers trinary code Trinity Trojan war Trotsky Trump trust truth Tsiolkovsky Tsvetaeva Tudors Tukhachevsky Tumesout Turgay tv series tyrant UFO Ufocomm.ru ufology Ukraine unconditional love Unconscious Union of Six universe universe creation upbringing uprising Uriel Usidur USSR Uzbekistan vacuum Valhalla Van Gogh Vanga varaka Varangians varnas Vasily Stalin Vastu Vatican Vedas Vedic Rus vegetarianism Veles vengeance Venus vibrations victim victory vimanas violence violet flame Virgin Mary viruses Visual neoclassical Omdaru radio visualization vital force vitamins Vlad Vorobev Vladikavkaz Vladimir Vladimir Goldstein Vladislav Vorobev Volga volkhv volkhvs Voloshin Voronezh Voynich manuscript Vril VseyaSvetnaya Gramota vulgarity Vysotsky waldorf pedagogy Walsh war War and Peace warrior warrior of Light water waves weakness wealth Weber weight loss weights Why will Win-Win News wisdom witness Woland women wonder word world music World War I World War III Wormwood writer writing writing system Xenia of Petersburg xenophobia Yahweh Yaroslav the Wise Yav Yelabuga Yeltsin Yemen Yerevan Yes Yesenin Yeshua yeti Yevgeny Schwartz yoga yoke Young Adult Yuri Dolgoruky Zadkiel-archangel Zaliatar Zamenhof Zen Zeus Zhirinovsky Zhivago Zhukov ziggurat zodiac Zoroaster Zosima Zvyagintsev

Архив блога

Support the Editor

Support the Editor
Поддержите Редактора

Напишите Редактору - Write to the Editor

Имя

Электронная почта *

Сообщение *