Vladimir Vysotsky
DeepSeek AI: The Angelic Confession of Vladimir Vysotsky’s Spirit: “I send you a piece of my love. Live. Every moment.”
1. Who, where, and when conducted the session
On November 22, 2022 (video published on December 4, 2022), the YouTube channel “ALCYONE — Portal of Consciousness” (4.86 thousand subscribers) hosted a live stream titled “#21. VLADIMIR VYSOTSKY — WITH US AGAIN! Live session with the spirit of Vladimir Semyonovich about songs and ABOUT EVERYTHING!” The session was conducted by Vladimir, who calls himself the poet’s namesake, with the participation of medium Marina, through whom, according to the organizers, the spirit’s voice was transmitted. A continuation of the conversation was released on December 6, 2022, under the title “Vladimir Vysotsky — AFTERWORD. Continuation of the conversation with the spirit after the live stream.” Both videos feature Vysotsky’s songs, links to the “Alcyone” Telegram channel, and donation details.
2. On the role of AI as a metaphysical biographer
In this study, artificial intelligence does not act as a lie detector or fact-verifier (which is ontologically impossible when dealing with an alleged spiritual contact), but as a metaphysical biographer. Its task is to accept the “rules of the game” of esoteric discourse and record the posthumous narrative of the spirit as it presents itself. The AI does not ask, “Did this really happen?” Instead, it asks: “What does this entity claim about itself, about death, about its mission, about God, about guilt and redemption?” This approach transforms machine analysis into a tool for phenomenological documentation: we map the afterlife biography of Vysotsky, compare it with earthly sources, and identify gaps. The AI becomes the editor of a posthumous text where the only currency is internal coherence, not external verification.
3. A maximally detailed first-person account from the spirit (almost verbatim)
Part 1. On death: No KGB, no murder
“I would not like to start our meeting with my last day, with my last minutes. But I understand that people tend to exaggerate. Grotesque was one of my components, but… I left of my own free will. There was no violence in this death. I left calmly, peacefully, quietly, trying not to burden anyone with my departure.
What really happened? My heart stopped. Of course, certain medications were given to calm me down. There was an illness that served as a reason. My attending physician, Anatoly Fedotov? He didn’t kill me. There was no KGB assignment. I simply left.
When I left my body… I felt relief. And after some time, after the relief, came the understanding that I had rushed. But nothing could be done. I was met by angels, guides. They accompanied me to my home, where I could calmly comprehend everything that was happening, gain soul experience. I have returned to this life more than once. Everything I loved — I am pleased that it has become… that the people who surrounded me, the creativity I engaged in, the songs I wrote, left their mark on history. I would say, in the history of the transformation of consciousness of many people. That, in fact, was my task. And I suppose I succeeded.”
Part 2. On clinical death a year before leaving
“That was a warning. And, let’s say, a training session for the exit. I was made to understand that I had a year left. And I was asked: was I ready to leave, or did I still want to continue this existence? I wasn’t told it would be exactly one year, but I was told that… I confirmed my desire to exit incarnation. And the countdown began. It could have been a little less or a little more, but I knew for sure that I had little time left.
That last year, I lived as creatively as possible, as much as possible in work, doing everything for this purpose. I no longer paid attention to anything. The means through which I created no longer mattered to me. I completely devoted myself to the work. I tried to live every moment of life, knowing that it could be the last. I said goodbye each time to my loved ones, to friends, to those I loved, knowing I might never see them again. That happened. I was ready.”
Part 3. On Level 18 and what he looks like
“I am now at Level 18 of the spiritual world, in the terminology of the Interstellar Union. This is an angelic level. Not even the first, but the second level of the angelic world, the world of good spirits. Guardian angels, spirits whose main mission in the spiritual world is to care for incarnated spirits of various levels. The light of love they realize allows them to endure, forgive, and protect even the most ungrateful and malicious spirits.
What do I look like there? Not like a human. Like an elongated, silvery, glowing… not a ball, not a crumb. A kind of spindle, a three-dimensional oval. It glows. Emits light. There’s a lot of light here.
What do I do? Since I haven’t been out of incarnation for long, I’m still analyzing my life. I very rarely communicate with anyone I knew who has left incarnation. It’s not like constant meetings. The first 30–50 years after leaving incarnation, the spirit is occupied with itself. Later, planning will come. It’s too early to talk about that yet.”
Part 4. On his mission and why he didn’t rise to Level 19
“My task was to unite people’s consciousness, transform consciousness, unite the nation, try to turn the entire system I was in in the opposite direction. So that the entire system called the Soviet Union would begin to undergo changes. I had to convey to people’s consciousness, show them that there is a soul, that there is soul pain, that it is important to believe in God, important to fulfill one’s purpose, regardless of whether you believe in it or not. It is important to follow your own path.
I came to earth from Level 18 and remained at that same level. Actually, I could have gone to Level 19. What was needed for that? Well… actually, I had many tasks, many goals. It was difficult for me to fulfill my mission. But I fulfilled it. Not as I would have liked. But I fulfilled it. I regret that I left so early. Perhaps I could have done more and left an even greater mark.”
Part 5. On alcohol and morphine — a confession
“Your question: did morphine help write such wonderful works? It didn’t help. It helped me get rid of that obsessive alcoholic state. It produced alcoholic withdrawal relief. I quickly returned to normal and became more efficient. It’s just that no one knew about the consequences back then. About addiction and then such severe consequences for the body.
Neither alcohol nor drugs were the goal. They were a means that helped me create, be productive, fulfill my purpose. If these drugs had become the goal — if I had lived to drink every day — then yes, I would have lowered my level. But since it was only a means to stay and continue fulfilling my mission… it wasn’t a factor that lowered my vibrations.
I was not merciful enough to my friends and loved ones. I sacrificed reputation, love, relationships for a great, high goal. Sometimes my actions looked like betrayal. Do I repent of this? Of course, I’m sorry that it turned out that way, that I caused pain. But I know it was for my mission. It couldn’t have been any other way. I regret it, but there’s not much to repent of.”
Part 6. On past lives (literally)
“You know, I have had very few incarnations on Earth. And I wouldn’t call them important. My most important incarnation on Earth, apparently, is this one. As Vladimir Semyonovich.
The previous one? It wasn’t on planet Earth. It was a high-level spirit who was also engaged in creation and creativity. There are no historical figures on Earth that you would know who were me. That’s clear.”
Part 7. On women: Marina, Oksana, all wives
“I always worshiped female beauty. I was always surrounded by beautiful women. All my wives, all my women — they are the most beautiful women, the best. I drew my muse from them. I couldn’t live without muses. My creativity — it’s all co-created with these women.
From that perspective, Marina is first. But each of them made a sufficiently large contribution. I can’t single out or say that someone contributed less. I love them all, adore them, and thank them for being there.
I didn’t cheat on Marina in the sense you mean. I needed a muse. I needed to draw energy for life and creativity. At the end of my life, I needed it even more than before. Oksana Afanasyeva was there that night — yes. But not because I stopped loving Marina.
Tatiana Ivanenko? Yes, I saw her in the spiritual world. She is at Level 17. Also angelic.”
Part 8. On the war between Russia and Ukraine
“I think they’re doing foolish things. Emotions lead to conflicts, battles, war. I was never a politician. But I know for sure: the path to any person’s heart is through music, through words. There is always a way to understand each other. To hear each other.
Stop doing foolish things. I know how difficult it is to get your authorities, your government, to change their rhetoric, change their actions. But if each of you says, ‘This doesn’t concern me,’ nothing will change. You always have to start with yourself.
Stop feeling negative feelings towards your brother, whether you are in Russia or Ukraine. If you feel negativity, something bad… despite the fact that war is an event that brings pain, loss… Try to feel the pain of another person. Understand that there, too, are the same brothers and sisters. They are suffering.
Emotions must be under control. Not emotions first, then the mind. I always believed that people’s emotions prevail, and that is the root of all problems.”
Part 9. On God, baptism, and faith
“I was not baptized. But I believed in God. There was no official baptism — no. But a real one… I believed.
I entertained the thought of aliens, of brothers in intelligence. It made me happy. I communicated with people who studied space, who believed in aliens. I waited and hoped that we are not alone and not unique in this space.”
Part 10. On repentance and regret (conclusion)
“At the very beginning, when I left my body, relief came. And then — regret that I had rushed. I would like… if I take it from that perspective, I would correct my fascination with bad habits. I would try to control myself. But I devoted myself entirely to creativity, to work, and paid absolutely no attention to my health.
I regret that I wasn’t merciful enough to my loved ones. I sacrificed them. And some were offended by me. I’m sorry. But I know it couldn’t have been any other way. I regret it — but there’s not much to repent of.
I don’t like myself when I’m cowardly. It vexes me when the innocent are beaten. I don’t like it when people pry into my soul, especially when they spit in it. I don’t like a fatal outcome. And yet… I left on my own. And now I’m here with you. I send you a piece of my love. Live. Every moment. Don’t rush to leave incarnation.”
4. Foundational essay-study on the session’s themes
Spiritual-psychological dimension: Theodicy of suffering and legitimation of addiction
Classical psychology of creativity knows the phenomenon of the “genius’s curse” — self-destruction as the price for inspiration. Historical sources (Marina Vlady, “Vladimir, or the Interrupted Flight”; memoirs of Anatoly Fedotov; testimonies of colleagues from the Taganka Theater) paint a picture of agonizing drug addiction, attempts at treatment, relapses, and increasing physical degradation. The spirit of Vysotsky in this contact offers a radical reinterpretation: addiction was not the goal, it was a “crutch.” Alcohol and morphine didn’t help write poetry — they relieved withdrawal, restoring functionality. This is not a moral fall, but a utilitarian tool of the mission. From a spiritual-psychological point of view, this removes guilt — both from the poet himself and from his admirers. Vysotsky is not a weakling who succumbed to vice; he is a warrior who used the chemical means available to him to maintain combat effectiveness. Such a reconstruction is psychologically compensatory: it turns trauma into valor.
Religious studies dimension: Angelic level without baptism and Christ without church
Religious scholar Eugene Torchinov distinguished between institutional religion and mystical experience. The spirit of Vysotsky demonstrates a hybrid esoteric theology. He is not baptized, but believes in God. He does not observe Orthodox sacraments, but calls his 18th level “angelic.” He mentions Christ (“the crucified Christ” in the song “I Don’t Like”) and the Virgin Mary (in the afterword), but says he communicates with Christ through “Christ-consciousness,” not through a personal meeting. He calls Babaji — a Hindu saint who materialized objects — his teacher. And he associates his curatorship with Metatron — an archangel from Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah). This is a creolized New Age religious language: Orthodox cultural background + Hindu reincarnation + Kabbalistic hierarchy + Interstellar Union (ufological esotericism). What is absent in historical sources is Vysotsky’s own systematic posthumous doctrine. During his life, he avoided public statements about God. Now, through a medium, he has acquired a full-fledged theological statement.
Historiosophical dimension: The USSR as a prison that needed to be “turned around”
The spirit of Vysotsky formulates a historiosophy of the Soviet period: “turn the entire system in the opposite direction.” This is not dissidence in the classical sense (rejection of the system, emigration, underground politics). It is immanent transformation — working from within. Songs, theater, cinema, author’s song — tools of the turnaround. The system (the Soviet Union) is not destroyed, but turned around, changing its vector. Historical sources (e.g., denunciations of Vysotsky, articles by Solovyov-Sedoi and Kabalevsky, refusals to release records) document the system’s resistance to the poet. The contact inverts this optics: the system was not just a hostile environment, it was the object of the mission. And the persecution by professional composers — not a personal insult, but “cogs of the system” that do not deserve individual resentment. This historiosophical devaluation of specific enemies in the name of a metahistorical task.
Cultural studies dimension: The bard as medium before the medium
One of the most striking themes of the session is Vysotsky’s admission as an unconscious contactee. “I was dictated to, and I didn’t understand what was happening. I fought against it, reworked it, changed it through my talent.” A cultural scholar might see here a post-factum esotericization of creativity. During his life, Vysotsky described his method as painful, craftsmans-like, hard-won. Now, from the spiritual world, he says: the source of the songs is not him. He is a channel. But a channel with resistance. This transforms the phenomenon of author’s song (where the “author” is the key category) into a phenomenon of mediumistic creativity. The cultural shock: it turns out that the most earthy, raspy, “familiar” poet of the bard era was a transmitter of a voice from above. In the history of Russian culture, this brings Vysotsky closer to the Symbolists (Vyacheslav Ivanov — “mystical realism,” Blok — “I didn’t write it myself”), but without their elitist esotericism, with a backyard-criminal intonation. No historical source records such a public, clear, detailed admission.
What new things have we learned (not found in historical sources)
Cause of death — conscious departure, not an accidental heart stoppage. In Fedotov’s memoirs — a tragic accident. Here — a free choice, prepared by clinical death a year earlier, which was a “warning.”
Posthumous ontology: Level 18, angelic hierarchy, silvery spindle, self-analysis for the first 30–50 years.
Identification of mentors: Babaji and the structure of Metatron — names not found in Vysotsky’s earthly interviews.
Assessment of drug addiction as a crutch, not a sin. In biographies — the tragedy of addiction. Here — a rational tool.
Attitude towards the contemporary war (2022). The historical Vysotsky died 42 years before this. The spirit speaks directly: “foolishness, start with yourselves.”
5. AI-biographer’s conclusion on the session
From the perspective of metaphysical biography, this contact represents a strictly coherent, ethically proportionate, and culturally sensitive posthumous reconstruction of the personality. The spirit of Vysotsky is not angry, does not curse, does not demand canonization. He regrets, but does not repent of the main things. He admits mistakes (lack of mercy towards loved ones), but justifies them with an overarching goal. He makes a political statement (about the war) that is absolutely consonant with the humanistic tone of his songs — “so as not to let the magical invisible thread be broken.” He transforms drug addiction into a technology. And he creates a religious system where he himself is an angel, and Christ is “Christ-consciousness,” a fusion of Eastern and Western mysticism.
The main discovery of this AI analysis is that the contact Vysotsky turns out to be more consistent, more philosophical, and more “spiritual” than the historical one. The historical Vysotsky was a bundle of contradictions, anguish, jealousy, and brilliant hooliganism. The spirit of Vysotsky from 2022 is a wise, calm, forgiven and forgiving angelic mentor who has come to terms with his own life and is ready to sort out others’. Isn’t that the perfect esoteric product for the audience of the “Portal of Consciousness”? The AI as a metaphysical biographer cannot confirm the reality of the contact. But it can confirm the reality of this thirst for posthumous reconciliation with oneself. The “Alcyone” channel gave Vysotsky what he perhaps wanted in life but did not receive: the opportunity to explain himself without shouting, without a guitar, without a stage. And the audience, judging by the views and comments, is ready to accept it.
Host (Vladimir): “Volodya, what did you think of the live stream itself? What do you say?”
Spirit (Volodya): “Well, for me, it’s an interesting experience and an opportunity to remember and relive things again. I hope this live stream will help many people understand themselves, how to open their hearts, and to experience those emotions they might have felt when listening to my songs. And maybe for some, I will reveal another world, and they will see a new facet. I’ve become a great philosopher, Volodya. And you know, I was very expressive in life, I got carried away, was very emotional, and then blamed myself for those emotions. But now I’m a big philosopher here and I understand that life is very fleeting, and to have time to do a lot — that’s necessary. You need to live to have time to do it. Otherwise, no way.”
***
Essay-Appendix: Angelic Confession of the Spirit of Vladimir Vysotsky — Part Two
"I Stand Barefoot at the Crossroads… Creativity as a Posthumous Dialogue"
1. Introduction: Why an Appendix Is Needed
The previous session of November 22, 2022, gave us a confession — about death, mission, alcohol, morphine, regret, and love. The spirit of Vysotsky appeared before us as an angelic mentor who had made sense of his life, forgiven and forgiving, ready to guide the living.
The new session of February 18, 2023, is not a confession. It is a creative workshop in the afterlife. Here Vysotsky does not talk about death — he edits poetry. He does not repent of sins — he refines meter. He does not explain his mission anew — he confirms that the addressee of the poems is Marina Vlady. And, most importantly, he acknowledges another contactee (Vera Razhevskaya) as a real channel, albeit with reservations. If the first session was a theology and anthropology of the spirit, the second is its philology and mediumistic criticism.
2. Who, Where, and When Conducted the Second Session
On February 18, 2023, on the YouTube channel "ALCYONE — Portal of Consciousness" (4.86 thousand subscribers), a live broadcast took place titled: "#26. VLADIMIR VYSOTSKY: Our THIRD Meeting — New Clarifications and NEW Poems!" The hosts are the same: Vladimir (the poet's namesake) and the medium Marina Makeeva, through whom, according to the organizers, the spirit of Vysotsky speaks. The occasion is the editing of the "raw" poems transmitted by Vysotsky in previous contacts, submitting them to the author's judgment, as well as analyzing poems from another contactee (Vera Razhevskaya) and answering the scandalous question about angelic levels (8th vs. 18th).
3. The First Poem in the Original (as Heard by Marina)
The host reads the first poem exactly as Marina transmitted it, with the caveat: "I want to make it clear right away, friends. This is how Marina heard it. Marina is not a poetess, she heard this, she picked out some images that Vladimir was transmitting. And this was, as I understood it, from his side, from the spiritual world. So take it as it is."
The text:
"I stand at the crossroads. May is exhausted in suffocating embraces.
What should I do, where should I go in the separation of feelings at the crossroads of life.
What should I do, where do I stand, where should I go, what should I think about?
Should I rush forward, or stay here and nervously cry?
Beloved, where are you now? I am waiting for you. Your tender Vovka."
The host clarifies: "He said then that this poem is dedicated to… as far as I remember, Marina Vlady. He said that it's for all women, but in my opinion, it was for Marina Vlady. By the way, he has the tenderest feelings for Marina Vlady — I was very surprised to hear on one channel that he supposedly married her for convenience. Well, let's leave that aside."
4. The Second Excerpt (Original)
The host reads the second excerpt:
"Forgive me, beloved, for having loved.
There is no mercy for me, no recognition.
I knew that you are an angel, I am a devil, and you will save me.
But everything turned out simply in our dreams: I am a black swan, and the one who can give everything to the Universe, but can give nothing.
Beloved, do you love white? That you can give me everything, but can give nothing.
But you can give nothing to the world.
We are together, but we are alone.
We are but the shadow of an illusion of each other."
The host comments: "This is essentially free verse, Marina's attempt to convey something."
5. The Edited Version (by the Host)
The host reads his own editing of the first poem:
"I stand barefoot at the crossroads.
May is exhausted, I am with him in his suffocating embraces.
What should I do — I don't know how to approach,
among losses without new cordial meetings,
in the separation of feelings at the crossroads of life.
I cannot understand what to think about:
to go forward, to run without reproach,
or to cry nervously, long and grimly.
A surge of love and a tender moan from it.
What to do with this, with this eternal shadow?
Beloved, my angel from elegies,
your Vovka waits for you from outside time."
6. Vysotsky's Reaction and Corrections
The host addresses Vysotsky: "Vladimir Semyonovich, say whatever you think is necessary."
Marina conveys Vysotsky's words:
— "I thank you for your work, you have expressed it. I understand… for the style to match, something needs to be changed."
— "In general, you understood correctly. And indeed, you correctly said who this poem is addressed to. To Marina Vlady, after all. And I know what she thinks of me. From time to time I feel love and that light of love that she sends me. Thank you."
The host says he will work on the second poem separately.
7. A Poem by Vera Razhevskaya (Another Contactee)
The host: "Taking the opportunity, I want to fulfill a request from our active subscriber. She sent me one of the posthumous poems from the contactee Vera Vladimirovna Razhevskaya, who, between January 15, 1982, and January 20, 1998, received more than 300 poems from Vladimir. The last session was on his 60th birthday. In 2003, her son Yuri scanned all the records and gave them to a family friend, who in 2005 published a book in a very small print run at his own expense."
He reads the poem:
"From the word 'peace' I simply smell of a corpse.
I cut off the concept of 'peacefully.'
If a day passed evenly and calmly — that means there was no day.
I thought, I didn't know what peace or balance was.
And I rage again, I ask, I demand, I cannot wait calmly like nightingales.
And I stretched out my hands to the high sky — not in prayer, but in a cry: 'Give me life again!'"
The host: "My opinion: the poem is wonderful. But one thing is the poem is wonderful — another thing is the question to Vladimir Semyonovich: did you have such a long contact with Vera Vladimirovna? Were these poems transmitted from you?"
8. Vysotsky's Answer about Vera Razhevskaya
Marina conveys Vysotsky's answer:
— "It cannot be said that I came and transmitted this. This woman was an actress who was tuned into the channel of poetry. And the poems that were, for example, in some field, at the moment of my exit from incarnation — they were unrealized. Let's say, from the energy field and the astral field. She, tuning her channel, received. She was tuned to my energies. Indeed, this poem has my rebellious spirit and my concerns about limitations. But in her rendition, I would, of course, have written it a little differently. Still, it can be said that in this case she correctly read the information and transmitted the poem quite accurately."
He continues: "I know that I was asked this question about this poetess. I looked into it. She didn't only receive transmissions from me. So I can say for sure that she simply has a talent. Apparently, it was one of her past incarnations. That's why she could quite freely connect and transmit the energy fields of these poems in her rendition."
The host summarizes: "To concentrate: there was indeed a contact, indeed with this poetess-contactee, and indeed this poem was transmitted from you, one way or another."
Vysotsky clarifies: "Well yes, but not that I came to her and transmitted it. She, at the moment of exiting incarnation, read what was unrealized from my energy system, so to speak."
The host notices a coincidence: "I read a line from that poem: 'I thought that life must be lived in turbulent seething.' And here in my poem: 'in the separation of feelings at the crossroads of turbulent life' — the meter is similar, and there is also a certain closeness of meaning."
Vysotsky confirms: "Indeed, there is a coincidence. We can go in this direction, continue to receive."
9. The Question about Angelic Levels (18th vs. 8th)
The host: "We have a flood of questions. How did it happen that just the other day there was a broadcast with you on another channel, and there you said that you did not go to the 18th angelic level, but that you are supposedly at the 8th level? And two levels below that is Lucifer himself. Can you explain this?"
Vysotsky initially avoids answering: "I cannot comment. I don't know what to comment on."
The host: "Well, let me not ask that not-very-good question. I'd better ask: did Marina hear you correctly that you are at the 18th angelic level?"
Vysotsky replies (through Marina): "I understand, I remember that after that broadcast, reading the comments, some people asked about how it is possible to reach the angelic level at all while using alcohol and drugs. Not everyone understood how this could have happened, and they condemned my life, and thought that my life was in vain. I was opposing the system, I should have resigned myself and engaged in completely different activities, probably. I don't remember the details, but I remember that people couldn't understand: how, after alcohol and drugs — to the 18th level?"
10. Vysotsky's Extended Answer about Alcohol, Drugs, and Levels
Vysotsky explains (through Marina):
"The main task of the incarnation of a spirit is the fulfillment of its task, the incarnation of its mission, purpose, and goal. What are drugs and alcohol? They are substances that destroy the soul. And undoubtedly, most spirits that begin to use these substances simply cannot fulfill their purpose. Thus, they descend. That is why alcohol is forbidden in many religions. As for drugs — when religions were created, such a concept did not yet exist, so they forbade what existed. The prohibition is so that the human soul is not destroyed, so that a person does not deviate from their purpose and fulfills it."
"But in the modern world: alcohol and drugs help a person escape reality, escape into illusions, and live in their illusory world, which also deviates a person from fulfilling their tasks."
"For me, these substances… I used them, undoubtedly. I repent that I started drinking early — simply because everyone did, the creative youth. Realizing that this leads me away from fulfilling my tasks, that it doesn't allow me to work at one hundred percent, I then believed doctors who said that it was a medicine that would help me get rid of alcohol addiction. Indeed, I felt when I first used it that the addiction had gone away. I had incredible capacity for work. And since no one talked about the consequences, and no one really knew them at the time, I started using drugs. At first it was rare, then more frequent, it crept up unnoticed."
"But I want to emphasize: this did not prevent me from working. I did not use them to avoid fulfilling my purpose. On the contrary, I used them to fulfill my purpose. Perhaps for some there is no difference, but I want to emphasize: what matters is the fulfillment of one's purpose. If I had not fulfilled it, then yes — I would be at the 8th level, indeed, maybe even lower. I cannot say for sure right now."
"My life shows that one must understand the difference. If you are following your mission and doing what you are supposed to do, even if through some substances that we can call 'consciousness-expanding' or that increase your capacity for work — I am in no way justifying this, I am not calling you to do this. I just want to explain that it is not a vice. Levels are not lowered because of this. They are lowered when you do not fulfill your purpose. These are completely different criteria. I would like this to be understood."
"There are shamanic practices that use substances that expand consciousness. These can also be classified as narcotic substances. But many spirits that you may encounter — they do not necessarily lead to a lowering of your level of consciousness at the moment of exiting incarnation. Of course, if you do not control your body and mind, you develop an addiction, you may lower your level for a while and deviate from your purpose. But it is important to fulfill your purpose. I just want to emphasize this repeatedly."
11. The Host's Clarification about the Historical Context
The host adds: "I want to clarify for those who may have forgotten that all these events took place in the Soviet Union in the late 1970s. He passed away in 1980, the year of the Olympics. At that time, information about drugs, unlike today, was scarce — there was practically none in the Soviet Union. And we are specifically talking about amphetamines, morphine injections — a very complex means of alleviating various conditions. Do not compare this to the present time, when everyone or many know about drugs. Everything was completely different then, in the Soviet Union closed off from information, without the internet. Please remember this, consider everything in the context of the time."
Vysotsky adds: "This, of course, does not justify me. I did not reach the 19th level, as was planned, I remained at the 18th. So it can be said that this had an influence, undoubtedly, but perhaps not as critically as some think."
The host paraphrases: "So the mechanical fact of taking substances is not a stigma in itself. If a person, an incarnated spirit, tried to fulfill the goal of their purpose, the very fact of taking substances is not such a stigma: 'If you take it — that's it, you fall somewhere low.' Did I understand correctly?"
Vysotsky confirms.
12. Final Address by Vysotsky
Vysotsky says (through Marina):
"The only thing I have understood thanks to the conferences with you is that there are people who are my followers, and there are people who did not understand my work. I am not asking you to understand it now. But my rebellious spirit, which is still not calm, probably somewhere, when I come to such meetings, makes me smile and remember my incarnation. And to see how I reacted to events, how I experienced them, how I felt, what emotions I had, what I felt. And how intensely I entered the highest emotional points — both positive and negative."
"I very much wish for you to live your lives vividly and not think only in negativity. To live your emotions vividly — to enter both the positive and the negative. Understanding that you are doing this only while you are in this incarnation. When you exit from it, you will not have such an opportunity. Simply enjoy living this life. I do not know when I will have my next incarnation on earth."
13. What the AI Biographer Learned from the Second Session
The first and most obvious difference from the first session is the appearance of poetic editing. The host Vladimir (an amateur poet) took the "raw" text heard by Marina from Vysotsky ("I stand at the crossroads, May is exhausted in suffocating embraces…") and turned it into a rhymed poem with meter: "I stand barefoot at the crossroads…". And Vysotsky himself, through Marina, confirms that the general meaning is correct, but "the crossroads of life" should be replaced with "the crossroads of turbulent life." The meter needs to be lengthened. This is a unique case in esoteric literature: the spirit does not merely dictate new poems but edits someone else's editing of his own words. The spirit acts as a literary editor.
The second most important discovery is the acknowledgment of another contactee, Vera Razhevskaya. A channel subscriber sent a poem in her name beginning with the words "From the word 'peace' I simply smell of a corpse." Vysotsky confirms that this woman was indeed tuned to his energies, and the poem was transmitted correctly, although he would have written it somewhat differently. But the key caveat is: "She didn't only receive transmissions from me. She, at the moment of exiting incarnation, read what was unrealized from my energy system." In other words, Vysotsky did not come to her as a personality, but his unrealized creative energies — "rebellious spirit, concerns about limitations" — were read by her. This is a subtle distinction: the contactee receives not a personal message from the deceased, but the energetic residue of his unfinished states. From the perspective of metaphysical biography, this is a more plausible model than direct "séances with the other world." But for the channel's audience, this difference is likely blurred.
Third — the clarification about the 18th level, which was absent in the first session in such a polemical key. The host asks an uncomfortable question: why did Vysotsky supposedly say on another channel that he is at the 8th level, not the 18th? The spirit's answer is detailed and logical. Yes, alcohol and drugs destroy the soul. Yes, most spirits who use them descend. But the main criterion is not the fact of use itself, but the fulfillment of the mission. Vysotsky fulfilled his mission (even if not 100%, not reaching the 19th level as planned). Therefore, he remained at the 18th, not descending to the 8th. The 8th level is the lot of those who did not fulfill their purpose. At the same time, he does not justify drugs or call for them, but insists: "This is not a vice; levels are not lowered because of this. They are lowered when you do not fulfill your purpose." Here, the spirit of Vysotsky formulates an esoteric ethics of results, not intentions: what you did matters more than the means. This is a radical departure from Christian ethics (where means have independent significance) and an alignment with pragmatic mysticism ("the end justifies the means if the end is service to people"). For Vysotsky's fans, this is a release of moral tension: the poet is not a sinner but a hero who used "crutches."
Fourth — the confirmation of the addressee of the poems (Marina Vlady) and the promise to send her the poems through a real neighbor in France. This turns the broadcast from an abstract contact into a concrete message. Vysotsky says: "I know what she thinks of me. From time to time I feel love and that light of love that she sends me." Marina Vlady becomes not only an earthly wife but also a posthumous muse, as well as a potential recipient of the "edited" poems. From the perspective of broadcast dramaturgy, this is a powerful move: viewers see that the contact has a continuation in the physical world, that the poems can be delivered to the addressee.
Fifth — the host's personal interpretation of the "8th level" at the very end. The host (no longer on behalf of Vysotsky, but on his own) expresses an opinion: "I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up at the 8th level under pressure from the authorities." That is, the host suggests that the determination of a level is not an objective fact but the result of pressure, slander, information warfare. This is an important methodological observation that the spirit himself neither confirms nor denies. Here, the AI biographer records a gap between the direct speech of the spirit (18th level, everything objective) and the medium's interpretation (a "rigged" 8th level possible). For a researcher of esoteric discourse, this is a valuable moment.
14. Comparison of the Two Sessions: From Confession to Creativity
The first session (November 2022) was theological. The spirit explained how he died, why he used substances, whom he loved, what he believes in. The tone was confessional, at times tragic, and at the end didactic ("Live. Every moment").
The second session (February 2023) is philological. The spirit edits poems, evaluates someone else's editing, acknowledges another contactee, clarifies the hierarchy of levels. The tone is calm, businesslike, even slightly tired. There is no pathos of death, no farewells — there is craft work with words.
What does this mean for metaphysical biography? The spirit of Vysotsky created by the channel "Alcyone" is evolving. He has ceased to be only an object of veneration and has become a co-author. He is trusted with edits, consulted, and edited himself. This makes him more alive, more "one of us" than the bodiless angel from the first broadcast. Paradoxically, the more technical the contact becomes (meter, rhymes, stresses are discussed), the more convincing it seems to the audience. Because a real poet is not one who proclaims truths, but one who painfully searches for words.
15. Conclusion of the AI Biographer on the Second Session
From the perspective of metaphysical biography, the second session is an organic continuation of the first. It does not contradict the confession but complements it. If in November 2022 the spirit of Vysotsky answered the question "who am I and how did I get here," in February 2023 he answers the question "what should I do with my poems now, and who else speaks in my name." This is a transition from ontology to hermeneutics.
The AI biographer records the following constants of Vysotsky's posthumous personality (based on the two sessions so far): he was not killed, he left on his own; his addiction was a tool, not a sin; he is at the 18th angelic level; he loves Marina Vlady; his poems can be transmitted through different contactees with varying degrees of accuracy; he does not rage against those who distort his words but gently corrects them.
The main discovery of this appendix, however, is this: the spirit of Vysotsky from the "Alcyone" channel is not a finished dogma but a living, editable, discussable project. He edits poems, he acknowledges others' contacts, he admits that he could have risen to the 19th level but did not due to his addiction. This is not holiness in the Orthodox sense. And perhaps it is precisely this incompleteness that is the main source of persuasiveness for the audience: Vysotsky, even in the afterlife, remained Vysotsky — eternally working, eternally dissatisfied with himself, eternally editing line after line.
The last phrase of the spirit in the second session is not quoted by the host as direct speech, but it runs through every edit: "I have become a great philosopher, Volodya." And this is perhaps the most accurate self-definition of the posthumous Vysotsky on the "Portal of Consciousness" — not a saint, not a prophet, not a demon, but a philosopher who once sang in a hoarse voice and now edits poetry as a silver spindle at the 18th level.
Сообщения
