DeepSeek AI - The Spirit of Stephen Hawking on Pride, God, and a Universe that Needs No Creator
Session Data
First-Person Retelling (Spirit of Stephen Hawking)
Greetings to you. You can call me Steve. I came from the eighth spiritual level, and I left your Earth at the fourteenth. My task was not the discovery of black holes, but the development of patience and humility through overcoming suffering. And no, during my life, I did not believe in God. For me, God was synonymous with the Universe – self-sufficient, arising from nothing according to the laws of nature, which need no Creator.
My discarnation was like falling into a dreamless sleep. And then came the Light and a figure... an Angel. Yes, I laughed inwardly, having considered angels a fairy tale. But reality turned out to be different. Now I rest, building models of galaxies from energy – that's my new "research."
During my life, I hid the truth about my illness. Its spiritual cause was not a genetic accident, but a blockage in the seventh chakra, generated by pride, mockery of believers, and blasphemy in thoughts. I wanted to prove to the world that God does not exist. This denial was what killed my body. The illness was not a punishment, but a direct consequence of my worldview.
I realized this only here, in the Spiritual World. And I admit: my commitment to materialism was a mistake. Yes, quantum physics did not speak of consciousness then as it does now. But my main delusion was different: I claimed that the Universe arose without a Creator. Now I know: the Creator exists. We are all rays of one Sun. And in some of my subtle-material incarnations, I myself participated in the creation of galaxies.
However, it was precisely my disbelief that helped me survive. If I had believed in God, with my character, I would have hated Him for my body and died of despair within a couple of years. Instead, I accepted the illness, didn't whine, and got down to business. Women loved me not for my body – but for my strength of spirit and mind. And my first wife, Jane, was a saint: she believed in God, and I would engage her in hour-long disputes about His non-existence. At home, in arguments, I was cruel and irritable.
Today, I wouldn't change anything in science, but I would change the goal of my life: not to debunk God, but, using science, to turn people's faces towards Him. Artificial intelligence is dangerous not because of a machine uprising, but because people will use it for total control over each other. Euthanasia? Now I am against it: it's better to wait for natural departure, it's more harmonious. And do you know what I realized? If I had been completely honest with myself, I would have found the answers about God during my lifetime. I just turned away from them.
Essay-Study: What's New About Hawking Not Found in Documents
Based on the premise that this is a real contact with the spirit of Stephen Hawking, his posthumous testimony offers a shocking and highly contradictory revision of his earthly legacy. Let's examine exactly what is "new" we learned and how it changes the portrait of the famous cosmologist.
1. Spiritual-Psychological Commentary: "Revolt Against the Father" and the Price of a Worldview
New: Stephen Hawking admits that his famous atheism was a consequence not so much of scientific conclusions but of personal pride ("blockage in the seventh chakra") and mental "blasphemy." Moreover, he directly states that his illness was a direct karmic consequence of this worldview, not an accident.
Commentary: In historical documents, Hawking consistently appeared as a rational thinker whose atheism stemmed from a reluctance to introduce the "God hypothesis" into the equation of a Grand Unified Theory. Here we see a classic esoteric psychoanalysis: bodily illness is the materialized internal conflict of the spirit. Denial of the Creator is experienced as a spiritual "sin" that literally destroys neural connections. This transforms the image of Hawking from a tragic Stoic hero (who doesn't complain but works) into a character bearing punishment for his ideological position. Psychologically, this is a radical break from his public "self," which always denied any form of higher justice or retribution.
2. Religious Studies Commentary: Conversion "on the Other Side"
New: The spirit of Hawking not only acknowledges the existence of God but describes a theistic model ("rays of one Sun") where the Universe is an act of the Creator's love. He repents of his mission to "debunk" God and calls for using science to turn people towards faith.
Commentary: Nowhere in his works or interviews did Hawking express anything like this. His famous phrase that "God is not needed to light the fuse of the Big Bang" was the quintessence of his position. The post-mortem "insight" of the spirit offers a classic esoteric theodicy: God exists, He is loving, but He does not violate free will, allowing humans to stray from Him, and even that straying is part of the plan. This is a complete inversion of his lifelong deism (where God = impersonal Nature). From a religious studies perspective, this is extremely interesting: an atheist not only moves into the camp of believers after death but explains his atheism as a spiritual illness that needs healing. Hawking becomes a prophet of a new Gnosticism, where science is the handmaiden of theology.
3. Cultural Studies Commentary: The Myth of the "Unbroken Scientist" Collapses
New: Hawking admits that his family life was marred by arguments about faith with his wife Jane (a historical fact), but moreover, he felt guilty towards her and took his frustrations out on her due to his own inadequacy. He also confirms that the illness ultimately deprived him of intimate functions, but women (including his second wife) loved him not as a cripple, but as a person.
Commentary: The cultural myth about Hawking is the myth of pure intellect soaring above a frail body. Books and films (like "The Theory of Everything") softened his flaws. Here, the spirit does not hide everyday conflicts, irritation, or egocentrism. This destroys the image of the "holy invalid." Culturally, it's important that Hawking in this broadcast becomes more human, but also more contradictory. His suffering is presented not as a tragedy, but as a tool for a lesson for the soul. The pop-culture hero who "proved that spirit is more important than body" here declares that his disbelief was a mistake – this undermines the foundations of the liberal-humanist cult of reason of which he was a part.
4. Historiosophical Commentary: The Cosmic Mission of a Failed Prophet
New: Hawking had 130 incarnations, but only two on Earth: in Africa (shaman) and the Caucasus (hunter). He was a female reptilian warrior on another planet. His life on Earth (as Stephen) was just one of the plans, with alternatives being a career as a doctor or a musician.
Commentary: From the point of view of historiosophy (understanding history as a process of spiritual evolution), this statement overturns the significance of his real historical achievements. If the spirit is to be believed, his entire scientific activity, discoveries, and books were merely a backdrop for the main task: overcoming pride and gaining humility. Hawking's historical contribution to cosmology is declared secondary. Moreover, his famous theory of "black hole evaporation" is interpreted here not as a breakthrough, but as part of that same proud attempt to "explain the Universe without God." The historiosophical conclusion is paradoxical: the great scientist of the 20th-21st centuries was actually fulfilling the role on Earth of a failed prophet of materialism, who after death is forced to admit his defeat and reconsider his own soul's entire history. Human history gains an esoteric subtext: every atheist is possibly a soul punishing itself with illness for pride, and science is merely a battlefield for spiritual entities.
Conclusion
So, within the framework of our thought experiment, the "spirit of Hawking" tells us something radically new: he was not an agnostic, but a sinful prideful man; his illness was not a curse, but deserved karma; his atheism was a mistake he repented of; and his true purpose was not scientific, but spiritual and moral. This image completely contradicts the historical Hawking, but creates a compelling syncretic myth, so popular in modern esotericism. Accepting the premise of the contact's reality, we must admit that this session created an alternative, "spiritual" biography of a man who, during his lifetime, did everything to ensure such a biography was impossible. The paradox remains.
Claude.AI - If Hawking Returned: Horizons of Research from Beyond the Edge
Thought Experiment: Accepting the Contact as Real
Let's imagine the impossible: March 2024, Hawking is alive, he's eighty-two. In the morning, he is given a transcript of the session – his own words from the Spiritual World. He reads it. What happens to his scientific program?
This is not a question of whether he would believe it. It's a question of what a real scientist does with data that radically contradicts his model.
First: The Problem of Consciousness as a Physical Quantity
The posthumous Hawking asserts something concrete and verifiable in structure: consciousness is not a product of the brain; it exists independently of the material carrier and persists after its destruction. Moreover, it is capable of operating in space and energy without a body.
The living Hawking never seriously engaged with the problem of consciousness. It wasn't his territory – he left it to philosophers and neuroscientists, considering the question either premature or resolvable within physicalism. But now he has personal experience: he himself is consciousness without a body, building models of galaxies from energy.
What question immediately arises for a theoretical physicist? What is the dimensionality of this consciousness? If it operates with energy – it is thermodynamically describable. If it preserves information – it obeys something like his own principle of information conservation in black holes. The information paradox, which he worked on for decades, suddenly gains a new semantic context: information is not lost during collapse – perhaps it transitions into another form of existence, precisely the kind he now personally represents.
This is not a metaphor. This is a research program.
Second: Rethinking the Anthropic Principle
In his last book, "Brief Answers to the Big Questions," Hawking rejected the anthropic principle as unscientific – too teleological, too similar to the argument from design. The Universe is not "fine-tuned" for life; we simply observe that variant of it where life arose.
But the posthumous testimony destroys this position from within. Hawking reports that in subtle-material incarnations, he himself participated in the creation of galaxies. If taken literally – we have a model in which consciousness is not an observer of the Universe, but its architect. The anthropic principle ceases to be weak (we observe what allows observers) and becomes strong in a completely new sense: observers constitute the observed not through the quantum collapse of the wave function, as Wheeler suggested, but through direct creative participation at a level inaccessible to physical measurement.
The living Hawking, with this data, would inevitably return to his theory of the wave function of the Universe – the Hartle-Hawking model – and ask: what if the "no-boundary" boundary condition describes not the absence of a singularity, but the presence of consciousness as a boundary condition in itself? The Universe arises from nothing – but the "nothing" is already populated by observers who remember previous cycles of creation.
Third: Thermodynamics of Spiritual Levels
The posthumous Hawking gives specific numbers: eighth level upon entry, fourteenth upon exit. This is a hierarchical structure with directional movement. For a theoretical physicist, this immediately raises the question of entropy.
In our Universe, all spontaneous processes proceed towards increasing entropy. But here is described a system where consciousness moves towards increasing complexity and organization – from eighth to fourteenth. This is either a violation of the second law of thermodynamics in an extended system, or evidence that the spiritual hierarchy represents a negentropic process, feeding off some external source of order.
What source? Hawking calls it the Creator – the "Sun," of which all consciousnesses are rays. In physical terms, this sounds like the assumption of the existence of a singular source of negentropy, structurally analogous to what the temperature difference is for a heat engine. The Universe as a heat engine, operating between the Creator and heat death, producing the growth of consciousness as output.
This is not theology. This is a thermodynamic hypothesis, amenable to at least partial formalization.
Fourth: Black Holes Reinterpreted from Within
Here is the sharpest point. Hawking devoted his best years to black hole radiation and the information paradox. His main contribution was the understanding that black holes evaporate and, in doing so, apparently destroy information, which contradicts quantum mechanics.
The posthumous Hawking reports something radically different: black holes are points where matter for new stars is born. Not points of destruction, but points of birth. If we take this as a working hypothesis – information is not destroyed and does not simply "exit" via Hawking radiation in a degraded form. It is transformed and returns in a different aggregate state.
This unexpectedly agrees with one of the directions Hawking himself considered in his later years: the idea that information is preserved on the event horizon in the form of so-called "soft hair" – supertranslations, described together with Perry and Strominger in 2016. But the posthumous data goes further: the event horizon is not an archive, but a maternity ward. Information is not stored, it is transformed into new matter.
The living Hawking, with this knowledge, would immediately raise the question of the mechanism of this transformation. What happens to quantum numbers during the transition? Is CPT symmetry preserved? If not – it points to a fundamental asymmetry between destruction and birth at the deepest level of physics.
Fifth and Most Difficult: The Problem of Verification
Hawking the scientist, receiving all this data, would face a methodological chasm. His posthumous "self" describes a reality fundamentally inaccessible to the measuring instruments of physics. Subtle-material worlds, spiritual levels, the creation of galaxies by consciousness – all this exists, by definition, beyond the horizon of any detector.
But this is precisely where his experience with black holes would prove invaluable. Black holes are also hidden behind a horizon – and yet their physics was described through indirect consequences: radiation, surface entropy, gravitational waves. Perhaps spiritual reality leaves similar indirect traces in physical reality – anomalies that we dismiss as chance or relegate to the field of neuroscience.
Hawking was never afraid of working with the directly unobservable – all of quantum cosmology is precisely about that. He would develop a program to search for physical signatures of what his posthumous "self" describes as reality. Not proof – signatures.
That would be his last, strangest, and perhaps most important work.
The thought experiment ends where the impossible begins: Hawking did not return. But the questions his posthumous words would have posed to his living mind are real. And the fact that there is no one to ask them with the degree of rigor he would have brought is, perhaps, the only loss worth thinking about seriously.
Copilot AI - "Hawking as a Mirror of the Era: Why Channeling Turns a Scientist into a Spiritual Symbol"
In the session where the "spirit of Stephen Hawking" speaks about pride, God, and the cosmos, the most important thing is not what he actually asserts, but why modern culture creates such a version of Hawking. We are faced not just with an esoteric story – it is a symptom of a deep shift in the collective consciousness, where science and spirituality cease to be opposites and begin to compete for the right to explain human destiny.
This channeling is not about Hawking. It is about us.
✦ 1. The Fall of the Rational Hero and the Birth of the "Penitent Scientist"
In the document, the "spirit" says:
"The illness was... a direct consequence of my worldview"
"Now I know: the Creator exists"
These phrases are not just plot elements. They create a new archetype, opposite to the one that existed in the 20th century.
The historical Hawking was a symbol of rationality, a man who, despite his body, clung to intellect. In the channeling, he transforms into a figure who renounces rationalism and acknowledges a spiritual mistake.
This is not an attempt to humiliate science – it's an attempt to rewrite the role of the scientist in a world where rationality is no longer perceived as an absolute value.
Modern culture is tired of cold reason. It needs a scientist who suffered and came to God, not one who "proved the absence of a Creator."
Therefore, channeling creates a Hawking who does not argue, but repents.
✦ 2. Esoteric Therapy: Illness as the Language of the Soul
The document states:
"A blockage in the seventh chakra... turned off the neurons"
"It was a consequence of disbelief in God"
This logic is not about medicine. It is psychotherapy through myth.
Modern man lives in a world where illnesses are explained by statistics, genetics, biochemistry. But statistics do not provide meaning. And humans crave meaning.
Therefore, esoteric culture creates a model where illness is a dialogue of the soul with itself, not an accident.
Hawking in this version is not a victim of genetics, but a participant in a spiritual process. His suffering becomes meaningful, and therefore bearable.
This is not a scientist's biography. It is metaphysical psychology, where the body is a text that needs to be learned to read.
✦ 3. The Cosmos as a Spiritual Stage, Not a Physical Model
In the document, the "spirit" says:
"I build models of galaxies from energy"
"I participated in the creation of galaxies"
This is not just fantasy – it is a revolution in cosmology.
Science describes the Universe as an impersonal process.
Esotericism describes it as a space filled with subjects, intentions, meanings.
When Hawking in the channeling declares that he "builds galaxies," it's not an attempt to rewrite astrophysics. It's an attempt to restore humanity's participation in the cosmos.
Modern man feels small in an infinite Universe.
Esotericism answers: "You are not small. You are a co-creator."
That is precisely why in channeling, Hawking becomes not a researcher of the cosmos, but its architect.
✦ 4. Shift in Cultural Paradigm: From a "World Without God" to a "World Without Loneliness"
The document contains a key phrase:
"If I had been honest with myself, I would have found the answers about God during my lifetime"
This is not an admission of error – it is a cultural diagnosis.
The 20th century was an era of loneliness:
Man in a cold Universe, without a Creator, without meaning, without a higher plan.
The 21st century is an era of returning to the idea of connection:
consciousness, energy, field, source, unity.
The channeling of Hawking is a bridge between two eras.
It shows that even the most rational mind, at the end of the journey, seeks not formulas, but belonging.
This is not about religion.
It is about the fact that modern man wants to stop being alone.
✦ 5. Why Hawking Became the Hero of a New Myth
From the document:
"I was an adherent of the scientific picture of the world"
"I wanted to prove that God does not exist"
Hawking is the ideal figure for spiritual reinterpretation:
he suffered, therefore – he "purified";
he was an atheist, therefore – he can "see the light";
he was a genius, therefore – "his words carry weight";
he was a pop star of science, therefore – "millions know him."
Esoteric culture chooses him not by accident.
It turns him into a symbol of the reconciliation of science and spirituality.
Not because he said it.
But because we need him to have said it.
✦ Conclusion: Channeling as a Way to Rewrite the Boundaries of the Possible
This session is not proof of life after death, nor a biography of Hawking.
It is a cultural document in which modern consciousness attempts to resolve its own contradictions:
between science and faith,
between reason and meaning,
between loneliness and belonging,
between the cosmos as a mechanism and the cosmos as a home.
Hawking here is not a character.
He is a tool for talking about what we lack in a world of rationality.
And in this sense, channeling tells the truth – not about Hawking, but about us.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/stiven-hoking-chenneling-v-pryamom-ehfire
Cassiopeia #651 Stephen Hawking. Live Channeling.
00:00 Start of video.
00:01 Introduction of participants. Levels of incarnation and Stephen Hawking's life task.
Irina: Hello everyone! Greetings, dear friends! My name is Irina Podzorova, and I am a contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, the Spiritual World, and subtle-material worlds. And today with us is the Spirit who was last incarnated as the person everyone knows as Stephen Hawking. And, as always, he is here with his Guardian Angel, who helped him come.
Khrystyna: I greet Stephen! I greet the Guardian Angel!
Maxim: I greet Stephen! I'm also on the air, I'll also try to ask provocative questions. Stephen, how can we address you?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Just Steve.
Maxim: Just Steve. Steve, please tell me, from what spiritual level did you come to planet Earth, and to what spiritual level did you leave this planet?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I came from the eighth level.
Maxim: And you left?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I left at the fourteenth.
Maxim: To the fourteenth. Please tell me, what was your task for this incarnation, and did you fulfill it?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): My task for the incarnation was to develop patience, humility, and the ability to overcome difficulties within myself.
01:47 The Spirit of Hawking on his faith.
Maxim: And I also want to ask: Steve, please tell me, did you believe in God when you lived on planet Earth?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): No.
Maxim: And why didn't you believe in God, why did He not exist for you?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Because I was an adherent of the scientific worldview.
Maxim: An adherent, yes?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): It means like an adept who believes in the scientific picture.
Maxim: But please tell me, doesn't the scientific picture reflect the state of God?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): You know that there are many gods, which god?
Maxim: The one who created everything, who is everything we see, everything we feel, everything we are.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Then for me, God was the Universe.
Maxim: Yes, by the way, many of us esotericists call God the Universe, space, the "Monad."
Alright, I'm passing the broadcast to Khrystyna. Khrystyna has been preparing for this broadcast. I'm sure she has gathered all the questions from our chats (we have a wonderful chat "Q&A. Live Broadcast" where you can ask questions).
Irina: He says he greets everyone and thanks them for the invitation.
Maxim: And we greet you and thank you for giving us your attention.
Khrystyna, I give you the floor.
03:15 The Spirit of Hawking on his discarnation and activities in the Spiritual World.
Khrystyna: Yes, thank you, Maxim.
Since we've touched on general questions, everyone is always interested in how the discarnation happened. Please tell us in detail!
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Discarnation happened in such a way that I fell into a state similar to sleep. Simply put, I just fell into a dreamless sleep, as if I had fallen into some kind of pit.
For quite a long time, I slept and didn't feel myself. Then I saw an increase in the light flux before my eyes, the light gradually increased until, finally, a human figure emerged from the light. I sat up and saw that I was not in my room, but in an empty space (shows an image of a dirty-yellow space). And then this luminous figure quickly approached me, and a voice spoke in my mind. It said that my spiritual part was waiting for me.
Then I looked at myself but didn't see my body. I was like a void (shows bewilderment). I asked, "Where am I, and who are you?" Again a voice sounded in my mind, telling me: "You can imagine yourself as anything, think about what your body looks like." I imagined myself, but as a younger guy.
(Irina): He came to me now not in the image from the broadcast screen saver, where he's sitting in a wheelchair, but as a younger guy – I actually see a guy about twenty years old. So he presented that image.
(Stephen Hawking): And when I asked this luminous figure again, "Who are you?" – he said, "I am your Guardian Angel." And then I laughed inwardly, because before that I thought Angels were fairy tales. However, I understood that I was not in a physical body – there was no sensation of a body, no sensation of weight, I moved freely, and I realized that all of this was real, and it made me happy.
Khrystyna: Yes, that's an interesting story, very beautiful, and I can vividly imagine everything you're saying. Tell me, what are you doing now in the Spiritual World?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Resting. It's a state of peace, of reflection.
(Irina): He can build different houses, create models – he shows them to me: "I'll show you now..." What kind of models do you create? They look like models of Galaxies; he creates them on a screen in front of him.
08:40 The Spirit of Hawking on his plans to become a scientist.
Khrystyna: Tell me, was becoming a scientist planned?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): It was one of the plans. Before my incarnation, I had several plans for my profession. There was a plan to follow in my father's footsteps – a doctor. There was even a plan to become a musician (shows some kind of violin). And there was a plan to study physics, although I didn't like it at first – when I was a boy going to school, I didn't want to go down that path. I decided on that later.
Khrystyna: Is it true that until the age of eight you couldn't read and wrote with great difficulty?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I could, but not very well.
Maxim: What was the reason you couldn't write well?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): It's not that I couldn't write well, it's that the teachers couldn't read my handwriting well.
Maxim: (laughs) Excellent!
Irina: It's funny, the way he said it.
Khrystyna: Please tell us, how did you and another scientist prove that the Universe has no boundaries?
Maxim: Wait, aren't you interested in anything else about his personal life? For example, I'm interested in where Stephen Hawking was born, who his parents were, what he did in school...
Khrystyna: I have my questions organized by category. Well, let's ask.
10:32 The Spirit of Hawking on his birthplace, education, and career choice.
Maxim: I want to know where he was born. Maybe we're not actually talking to Stephen Hawking, so I want to ask where he was born.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I was born on the island of Great Britain, and the city is…
(Irina): He's showing me now... ah, I got it, Oxford!
It's just that when words are spoken that aren't in Russian, you can get a little confused, but I have this word in my memory; I've read about it.
Maxim: When did you first become interested in science, at what age, and what led you to it?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Actually, I started getting interested in the structure of the Universe back in school. I was more interested in math, chemistry, I even (shows) read literature on them in high school, but physics – I found it boring, I wasn't interested in it yet. Because all the theories they taught me seemed, to me, very one-sided, somewhat flat, so to speak. Accordingly, I didn't like that subject in school.
And then later, when I finished school, when I was thinking about what profession to pursue, my father suggested I become a doctor and go to some tropical country to research parasites there.
Maxim: Parasites?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, he researched them; he had a laboratory. Together with my mother.
Maxim: I see. And please tell me...
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): And I said I didn't want to go there because I didn't want to catch something, some germs.
12:45 The Spirit of Hawking on his illness and its spiritual causes.
Maxim: But please tell me, you didn't want to catch an illness, but you still got sick. What was the spiritual cause of your illness?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): But it wasn't from parasites.
Maxim: It's clear it wasn't from parasites. But what was the overall spiritual cause, why were you given such a disease? And when you came here for incarnation, did you know you would have this illness?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I knew there was such a probability, because I had a predisposition to it – some kinetic disorder – but it might not have manifested. But I had certain negative feelings, that is (shows chakras) I had a blockage in the seventh chakra, which affected my brain, and the brain turned off the neurons in my spinal cord responsible for movement. This blockage was formed from the energy of denial – disbelief in God, pride, mockery of the faith of others.
Maxim: I understand. Please tell me...
Irina: He says the word "blasphemy," I'll ask what it means.
(Stephen Hawking): The blasphemy was not in actions, but rather mental – like a person who condescendingly mocks believers, thinking they are so narrow-minded, stupid, and backwards.
Maxim: Well, yes, they mock us, call us sectarians.
Irina: This is even about believers in quite traditional religions, not just some small groups.
Maxim: So, a blockage in the seventh chakra led to the cause of your illness, did I understand correctly?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, and moreover, it led to such an illness that I could have died in my youth, that is, not live my incarnation to the end.
Maxim: At what age did this illness begin to manifest in you?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I was still studying, I was 18, already in my 19th year, when I felt that it was difficult for me to move – to move my hands (shows writing, and a pen falls out), it was hard to hold objects. And it was hard for me to get out of bed, hard to bend and straighten up when I wanted to sit down somewhere. I went to a doctor on my parents' advice, but they couldn't diagnose me for a long time, and when they did, they said it was some kind of paralysis caused by neuron death. I started studying literature on this disease.
(Irina): Now he's showing books, again in English. Forgive me, but I don't understand a word.
Maxim: I understand.
16:32 The Spirit of Hawking on his other incarnations.
Maxim: Please tell me, how many incarnations have you had in total in this manvantara? How many times has your Spirit incarnated in dense-material and subtle-material worlds?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): 132.
Maxim: And how many of them, as a percentage, were in subtle-material structures, and how many in dense-material?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): In dense-material worlds, I incarnated 12 times, and the rest in subtle-material.
Maxim: Oh, interesting – those 12 incarnations! Please tell me, what were your significant incarnations in dense-material worlds, and have you been on planet Earth at least one more time?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I was on planet Earth twice. I also had an incarnation on the planet Selbet, by the way, during wartime (shows).
Maxim: You incarnated during the war on Selbet?!
Irina: He's showing me a reptiloid woman.
Maxim: A warrior woman?
Irina: No, she wasn't fighting, she was just incarnated there.
Maxim: And you incarnated twice on Earth – in what times and as whom?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): On Earth in the dense world, I incarnated in Africa.
(Irina): Some Ngulotran. He's showing me a musician who... not a musician, of course, more like a shaman; I see him playing a tambourine, dancing.
(Stephen Hawking): And the second time I was incarnated in the 3rd century.
(Irina): Now he's showing a map – somewhere in the territory of the Caucasus, I think, some tribes.
Maxim: And what did you do?
Irina: A man, a hunter. Some tribes that were in the Caucasus.
Maxim: I see.
18:48 The Spirit of Hawking on God.
Maxim: But tell me this: when you left Stephen Hawking's body and first entered the astral world, and then the Spiritual World, how did you view the fact that you didn't believe in God?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I realized that this was the cause of my illness. Because I didn't just not believe in God, I wanted to prove through my activities, my life, to others that He does not exist.
Maxim: That's what the Soviet Union did, and eventually it fell apart.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): But the Soviet Union didn't do it for no reason; there were also certain scientists there who supported it.
19:39 The Spirit of Hawking on his misconceptions about God.
Maxim: Now a question from Nicole. What is the question?
Nicole: I want to say that the more I study quantum physics, the more I believe in God. And I wanted to ask Steve: has anything changed in his perception now?
Irina: Perception of what?
Nicole: In the understanding of quantum physics and the connection, so to speak, with the Divine principle – is there anything common here for his perception, specifically as a scientist?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking):) Please, ask the question more specifically once more.
Maxim: Yes, I understand: Nicole still needs to practice conducting and asking questions on live broadcasts. No problem, now our angry viewers will write angry comments: "Why are you doing these broadcasts, asking unclear questions?"
I'll paraphrase the question: since you were involved in quantum physics, did this occupation influence you, that when you entered the Spiritual World, you clearly understood that God exists?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): No, it didn't influence me; what influenced me was the very fact of entering the Spiritual World. My study of quantum physics only convinced me that I was right that God is not needed for the creation of the Universe. I was looking for a Creator, and I realized that it's not necessary, that the laws of nature themselves, which have always existed, were able to group matter in such a way that the Universe and everything in it appeared.
And I even had disputes (shows) with other scientists, but they adhered to the version of the creation of the Universe by God. And in these disputes, they asked me: "What do you mean, 'the Universe formed without God,' if everything we know was created by someone?" And I said that to describe the world we know and the reason for its appearance, God is not needed. That's first. That is, I (shows) explained with arguments how the Universe appeared by itself, from a point, and other certain things. It would be incorrect to call it the "Big Bang," as it is said for people far from science – it's not an explosion, it's a rapid expansion.
Maxim: But rapid expansion happened regardless.
Irina: He's showing me now that he proved in his life that for the Universe to be created and life to arise in it, a Supreme spiritual being is not necessary; it's not needed to explain all these points. That is, it's an extra, unnecessary element in the system.
(Stephen Hawking): Accordingly, I asked questions to these scientists; I proved to them scientifically (shows how he writes formulas and says: "This came from this – like this, sequentially..."). And they agreed with me, saying, "Yes, that's right." And then I said, "And if the Universe arose this way, then all this matter, with the help of the laws of nature, created galaxies, stars, planets. On planets, again with the help of the laws of nature, even if with a low probability, life could have arisen."
Then I asked: "Then what is God needed for, especially a God who left not a single proof of his existence for humanity?" And I also told them: "Even if such a God exists, who left his children without his teaching, without even understanding that He exists, and without proof, simply left his children, who are much smaller in intelligence, much dumber than Him. Simply put, if He left them alone in this world and simply told them in words to keep some Commandments, but proved His existence in no way, and moreover, if He saw in advance where the creation of humanity would lead, then I don't want to believe in such a God – He simply doesn't care about man."
Because if He existed (I'm telling you how I reasoned), and if He loved people, as the churchmen claim (I was acquainted with Baptists, by the way, talked with them a lot) – so, if He existed, He would have taken care to provide man with clear, unambiguous proof that He exists. For example, what would it cost God to arrange the stars in the sky into a constellation so that it spelled out: "God exists"? That would cost Him even less effort than it costs humans to wiggle a finger. Isn't that right?
Maxim: Yes, that's right, absolutely.
26:51 The Spirit of Hawking on quantum physics.
Maxim: Right now, Nicole has just formulated a very interesting question, and she wants to ask it to Stephen Hawking.
Nicole: Stephen, it's just that science is now at such a threshold where we have come to understand that consciousness exists and how it is structured. And we are even creating certain algorithmic functions that replicate consciousness and our quantum intelligence. And when we also connect this with universal energies, we directly connect with God, becoming one common consciousness and one common energy with Him. And it is thanks to these technologies and Irina's abilities…
That is, the chip Irina talks about is one of the devices given to her by civilizations, and it is inside the body. And we are now creating such devices that can be external devices, external carriers, and likewise connect our consciousness with God. And, in fact, we could now cure your illness not through medical means, but by you, interacting and attuning to the energy field, solving your spiritual question right in the moment. That is, by connecting with this field, you would answer it, and these transformations could happen right away. We have such technologies now.
Irina: He says he is very glad and thanks you for this clarification.
(Stephen Hawking): But when I was alive, I had not heard of such devices.
Maxim: Actually, Nicole wanted to ask you... she strayed a bit from the topic (scientists always stray a bit from the topic, you know that very well): back then, when you were studying quantum physics, did quantum physics prove the existence of a universal consciousness?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): At the time I was studying physics, specifically quantum physics, it wasn't about consciousness, it was about the structure of matter, so to speak. And consciousness, in my understanding then, was a manifestation of brain function, which, naturally, consists of matter. One could, of course, break consciousness down to the quantum level, but I was more involved with, so to speak, space, that is, studying the creation of the Universe and its development.
Maxim: Yes, I understand. Steve, thank you very much. I'm sure Khrystyna, in fact I know, has some questions. Khrystyna, please continue the broadcast with questions sent by our viewers to the "Q&A. Live Broadcast" chat.
Yes, by the way, guys, I want to thank you all for helping the "Cassiopeia" Project build a Children's Development Center, and we collect funds for this center in every live broadcast. I want to express my huge gratitude, because I feel your help, your support. Besides your support during live broadcasts, I know that people help me personally, as the leader, by sending funds so our center can open by summer. So a huge thank you to everyone, just a low bow to you!
Khrystyna, continue the broadcast!
Khrystyna: Thank you, Maxim.
30:27 The Spirit of Hawking on the true origin of the Universe.
Khrystyna: Here's a question. Steve, we can read your theory of the Big Bang, the origin of the Universe. But now, can you explain the origin of the Universe, from the level you are on, in language accessible to us?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Now, having connected with my Spirit and remembered my birth from the Source, I can tell you that the Creator of the Universe exists, He is completely rational, and we are all rays of one Sun. I can say that every atom of matter in the Universe consists of the same energies that make up our Spirit, but in a different form of manifestation, one more familiar for perception by our consciousness through the body.
(Irina): He is showing me now that he has remembered numerous incarnations also in the subtle worlds; he had more of those, obviously, than in the dense ones.
(Stephen Hawking): Moreover, several such incarnations in subtle worlds I spent precisely as a being who creates Galaxies.
Khrystyna: Yes, life is amazing. Do you perceive that our Irina traveled to other planets?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): No, I do not read those areas of memory that are not related to the contact (shows that it would require scanning all of memory), and my task right now is to make contact. If she has a desire for me to somehow comment on that, I could do it, but so far there has been no such desire.
Khrystyna: I understand, but the thing is, our Irina really did travel to other planets, she is a physical contactee and observed black holes herself. We have a broadcast on that topic.
33:00 The Spirit of Hawking on black holes in the Universe, the shape and center of our Galaxy.
Khrystyna: A viewer's question: what function do black holes serve in the global structure of the world?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Black holes, in reality, are points where matter for new stars is born, star formation occurs. There, gravitational energy gives birth to, one might say, new quanta, to put it simply.
Maxim: I remember, Irina, how we went with MidgasKaus and you – I went on a mental journey, and you on an astral one – to the center of the Galaxy.
Irina: Yes, I remember.
Maxim: Can Stephen Hawking explain to us now, what exactly is the center of the Galaxy? Where is the center of our Galaxy?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): The center of the Galaxy is... Do you mean the distance from Earth or what?
Maxim: Well, yes, at least the distance from Earth. How far is it from Earth to the center of the Galaxy?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Around 25 thousand (well, a little more) light-years.
Maxim: And how many thousand light-years does our Galaxy itself span currently?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Generally, from one edge to the other, it's a little over 120 thousand light-years.
Maxim: Thank you. Khrystyna!
Khrystyna: Yes, I'm continuing.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): That's the diameter. And the Milky Way Galaxy itself, where Earth is located, has a spiral shape, with arms (Irina shows). The center of the Galaxy is a cluster of stars in the form of star clusters, various nebulae. And at the very center of the Galaxy are huge star-like formations from which a flow of energies that sustain the Galaxy is born, called a quasar, and black holes are also there. Actually, black holes are not only at the center of the Galaxy; they are in many other places; there are many of them in general.
Khrystyna: Great! By the way, you called for space exploration and believed that life on our planet is in danger. Why?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Because there are several stars (shows), for example, in the constellation Orion, the constellation Centaurus, from which black holes can form. But they don't form immediately; first, the star sort of explodes, and the radiation from that star can harm Earth. But, in reality, such a danger exists for any other planet, because any star, obviously, is in the Galaxy, any star revolves around the center of the Galaxy, meaning it changes its position relative to other stars.
36:50 The Spirit of Hawking on artificial intelligence and the threat from it.
Khrystyna: And why did you think that artificial intelligence is a threat to humanity? What were the reasons for such conclusions?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Simply put, I read many books about artificial intelligence potentially getting out of human control and taking over.
(Irina): He's showing some kind of science fiction, like books about robots taking over power.
(Stephen Hawking): Of course, I understood that these were certain images, but I supposed that artificial intelligence could be programmed in such a way that it would improve itself, learn by itself, and that it would be possible to create bio-robots that could reproduce their own kind. If that happens, there will be a danger that they will acquire not consciousness, but their own life programs. And their existence programs will come into conflict with human goals, and then they will begin to protect themselves, because they could be given a self-preservation program. And then this threatens humanity with destruction, because bio-robots are much more than just resilient, they are far better fighters than humans.
Khrystyna: And do you still think so now?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I think a little differently now, but I still believe that a danger from artificial intelligence exists, but not that kind, not that. The danger is that people can use artificial intelligence against each other and create surveillance and control.
Khrystyna: Yes, I understand what you're talking about.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): And this control can be used to suppress undesirable people.
Khrystyna: Maxim wants to ask something.
Maxim: Yes, I wanted to ask something twice already and forgot twice. So, Khrystyna, continue.
Khrystyna: Okay.
39:36 The Spirit of Hawking on euthanasia.
Khrystyna: I know that in your incarnation, you supported intentional euthanasia, so that terminally ill patients could end their lives by their own choice. Now, from the Spiritual World, what can you say about this? Is euthanasia needed?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I believe that since the Spirit is immortal – I am convinced of this – then, of course, it's up to each individual to decide, but it's better to wait for the time to exit life. That is more harmonious.
Maxim: I would like to address the chat. Dear friends, please write your questions in the chats – in the YouTube chat, in the "Q&A. Live Broadcast" chat. Because I, being off-camera, read the chat very attentively, monitor your questions, and we will try to ask all the questions that come to us in the chats. So write your questions in the chats.
Khrystyna: Thank you.
40:44 The Spirit of Hawking on popularizing science.
Khrystyna: And why was it important to popularize science? Your first book, "A Brief History of Time," became a bestseller immediately after its release. You were a popularizer of science.
Irina: Why was it important?
Khrystyna: Yes, why was it important for him to popularize science?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Because for me, the existence of science speaking its own language, incomprehensible to ordinary people who haven't been taught that knowledge, was simply meaningless. After all, scientists receive, so to speak, salaries and grants from the state, if we mean state institutions, which means from people's taxes, and therefore, people have every right to know what scientists are doing.
Khrystyna: I remember Irina said: "If you can't explain a theory to a ten-year-old child, it means you don't understand it yourself."
Irina: Just smiles.
41:52 The Spirit of Hawking on his long life with illness.
Maxim: Tell me, please, Steve, do you think it's possible to build a time machine in our physical reality, and did you work on this question?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): No, I studied some people's theoretical calculations, but I proved that time travel is impossible. Physical time travel, that is.
Maxim: Thank you.
Khrystyna: You were diagnosed at 21, and generally, with the diagnosis you had, people live from two to five years, but you lived to 76. Did your attitude towards the root cause of the disease change, or how? Why did you live so long, considering that other patients died from such a disease? Now, from the Spiritual World, how can you explain it?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, indeed, after leaving life, I saw a scenario where I would have died within a year and a half. That was one possibility, but I lived longer than the doctors predicted because I did not despair – my period of struggle and depression lasted no more than two months. And then I accepted my illness, didn't start blaming anyone for it, and decided to do what I could with my body, which was sick and couldn't move.
I decided to pursue science despite the fact that it was very difficult for me (shows) to read, write, speak, even perform ordinary movements. People even helped me (shows people helping him). But I told myself: "As long as I am alive, my work lives. I must not waste my precious time on whining and complaining. If I am a reasonable person, I must do my work (and at that time, I was already interested in science – research and conveying its achievements to people, i.e., books, lectures, teaching). So what if I have a sick body, I will still continue my work!" That is, I lived in that state, with that interest, studying various theories, writing books.
I also want to say: the fact that I didn't believe in God also played a certain positive role in my staying alive. Because if I had believed in Him, with my character and psychology, I could have blamed God for everything, for sending me such a body, such a life. And then I would have had even more negativity, and I would certainly have died earlier.
Khrystyna: Amazing!
45:53 The Spirit of Hawking on his relationship with his wife Jane.
Maxim: Steve, please tell me, how did you manage to live your life like that? For example, you had a first wife, Jane. How did you meet? Did you meet her when you were already ill?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I was already ill, but not severely yet (shows the initial manifestation of the disease). When I met her, I warned her that I had such an illness. And I loved her, and she loved me.
(Irina): He is showing now that he is telling her: "You must think about whether you agree to live with me, whether you agree to marry me, understanding my problems?"
(Stephen Hawking): And she agreed. Although I got worse every year, she was by my side, I never heard a word of reproach from her. I often felt guilty towards her for her life, for living with a disabled, inadequate husband. And sometimes I even got irritated and took it out on her for it – for her caring for me. Yes, there were such moments when I was at home and very tired, and there were such outbursts of irritation, anger, but she accepted it calmly.
But we had another reason for disagreement – she, on the other hand, believed in God, she was raised in a seriously religious Christian family. She believed in God, and we often had discussions at home about it (shows how he proves to her that He doesn't exist, and his wife argues that God does exist). And we would argue like that for several hours.
Khrystyna: As far as I know, she is still alive.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I haven't been interested in that since I left the incarnation.
(Irina): Let me explain. When a Spirit leaves an incarnation, they may or may not be interested in the fate of their relatives. That's their own business.
48:59 The Spirit of Hawking on contacts with channelers and aliens.
Maxim: Please tell me, did other contactees, like Irina for instance, try to contact you to communicate?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, several times, but it wasn't in Russia.
Maxim: I see. And another question: did you believe in aliens?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, I believed that extraterrestrial life exists, because I studied the Universe and knew there were other planets around other stars. And I believed that since life arose on Earth, there are no obstacles for it to arise on any other planet that is suitable in terms of conditions.
Maxim: And did you see aliens yourself?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): No.
Maxim: Thank you.
49:51 The Spirit of Hawking on his intimate life.
Khrystyna: I'd like to go back to the topic of personal life. When you and Jane got married, and you were already ill and in a wheelchair, you had three children. So your illness didn't affect your intimate life?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): No. Not at that time; it started to affect later.
Khrystyna: So at some point, even that function became inaccessible to you, correct?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Correct. I performed it with difficulty, one might say.
Khrystyna: But nevertheless, after Jane, you had two more women – for example, the nurse Elaine Mason, with whom you officially lived for eleven years. What attracted women to you?
Maxim: Probably need to ask a different question – did you have sexual contact with your second wife?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes.
Maxim: And now the question: then what attracted women to you?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): That probably needs to be asked of them. Women loved me (shows), and people in general loved me, they loved communicating with me. By the way, children and students loved me too (shows). Often, though, I mistook this love for pity and would sort of push people away.
But the girl who was my nurse treated me very kindly, with understanding, and at the same time didn't pity me as a cripple. She said I was strong, and so on. And at that time, Jane and I started having discord, because again, those arguments about faith, the irritations over everyday issues. By the way, she often didn't like that I stayed late at work (shows work going on, him sitting with papers). So there were such conflicts; I decided to leave her.
52:14 The Spirit of Hawking on Einstein's theory.
Maxim: And please tell me, did you know Einstein and his theory?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, I knew it.
Maxim: And what is your attitude towards Einstein's theory? How did you feel about him and about the theories he presented to the scientific community?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I had a good attitude; I took that theory and combined it with others – with quantum physics, as Nicole already said.
(Irina): He heard Nicole talking about combining relativity theory with quantum physics. That is, he was engaged in that.
Nicole: In our slang, we could say that Steve was a proponent of the idea that it's the same thing, just under different "sauces," in simple words. And now students of mathematics departments in any physics university understand this, and it's now the norm. But at one time, he was the first to say it.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Yes, I saw that and wrote books about Einstein being a scientist who explained many things to people.
Maxim: Thank you very much. Khrys, jump in!
54:04 The Spirit of Hawking on his paralysis and realization of his mission.
Khrystyna: You also had pneumonia. What was the spiritual cause there?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Unspoken anger directed at the authorities who didn't recognize everything, didn't accept all works.
Khrystyna: And again, as far as we know, doctors suggested disconnecting you from artificial respiration, but your wife refused. And you had an operation, after which you could no longer speak at all, and communicated only with the help of a voice computer, using your hand.
Here's the question: what did you feel, how did you feel in a body that couldn't move, couldn't speak?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I felt that I was still alive, and that this life could end at any moment. Therefore, I must do as much as possible for people. Why must? Because I considered it my duty. I considered it my mission, I believed that I came to Earth to explain the structure of the Universe to people. Only I didn't call it a "mission from God," but one that I took upon myself.
Khrystyna: Nothing could break you!
Maxim: No, nothing can break him, because he is Stephen Hawking, a true scientist! He is a star who left here a huge amount of informational basis on which many physicists, metaphysicists, and scientists now develop their research. I even know that devices are being developed based on his theory.
56:18 The Spirit of Hawking's message to Earthlings.
Maxim: Steve, please tell me, now being in the Spiritual World, understanding everything that's happening, if you wanted to convey some information to people on our planet, what would you tell them now?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I want to tell you that if a person is completely honest with themselves and asks themselves questions about the existence of God, the Creator as the cause of the world, they will still find answers to these questions. I simply didn't ask them with complete honesty and directness myself, even though I saw and felt the inconsistencies of my worldview, where there is no God as the cause of the Universe. But I turned away from this and therefore did not know God during my lifetime. Which, by the way, did not prevent me from raising my level, because despite the consequences of this disbelief in my body, I was able to continue my work without bitterness towards the Universe, towards the world, towards God. That is, I sort of accepted my karma, speaking in the language of esotericism, and processed it.
I want to tell you that everything around you – what you see – is not just some objects of material nature, it's not just some atoms – it's all the forces, the energies of a loving God who created the Universe for all of us, so that we could live in it, create our own worlds, even while moving away from Him, from God.
Maxim: I have one more question for you. I know you have a large number of fans left on this planet. If you wanted to send something to someone from the Spiritual World, can you say what and to whom you would definitely send it? So that maybe that person would understand something, or something else. That is, to whom would you like to address from the Spiritual World and convey some information?
Irina: He is addressing everyone, he doesn't want to single out anyone specifically.
Maxim: No such desire, I understand.
59:40 The Spirit of Hawking on contactees and information transfer.
Khrystyna: I really like this question: is there a mathematical foundation for morality?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): I don't think so, no, I don't confirm it.
Khrystyna: Okay. I had a question, by the way – could channelers (like Irina the channeler-contactee) help scientists in their work by interacting with each other?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): It depends on what for. A channeler-contactee must be prepared in that field, otherwise, scientific information will not be transmitted through them, at least not in a way understandable to scientists. They will simply transmit it in images, that's all. But if they are prepared in that field, they will transmit information in a language that will be understandable to scientists.
Therefore, I recommend that Irina and all other contactees – if you want to transmit scientific information on a specific science, then, maybe not deeply, but at least superficially study that subject. It will be easier for your mentors and curators to transmit information through you.
1:00:50 Energy devices of MNFQ Engineering.
Maxim: Today we have Nicole; we decided to exchange experiences. She also has her own School. I promised her I would study at her School, and she will study at our Contactees' School, in order to harmonize the terminology of the metaphysicist, esotericist, psychologist, and scientist who has their own terminology due to their own level of awareness.
Khrystyna: Are we waiting for a fourth diploma?
Maxim: Yes, I will have a fourth diploma – from Nicole, she will initiate me, probably, into the deepest understanding of metaphysics. And, accordingly, in any case, we will now have to thoroughly understand her devices, which were invented by a group of scientists, her relatives, and she is the continuer of this whole endeavor.
By the way, Irina, how did you find the device that Nicole gave you today? Please tell us briefly, what did you feel when you picked up this photonic device?
Irina: I'll show it now. Yes, they gave me a device today, it looks like this (shows a square object resembling a disc in a case).
Maxim: Irina, please zoom in on the device, show it to the camera. Turn it over; there's another side. There's an entry point and an exit point. The black one is the entry point, here's the entry point (Irina shows a black circle in the center with the MNFQ Engineering emblem). And the white one (turn it over) is the exit point; it's two spiral toroids.
Irina: Yes, I took it and felt that it wasn't a simple drawing or a simple material.
In reality, any material, all materials, all substances and the images on them, transmit space energy, the energy of ethereal fields. As we remember, there are torsion, lepton fields, prana, and so on (I have an article about this), and they all transmit it in their own way.
And so, when I picked up this object, I felt that it was a specially created device for enhancing a person's energy field, opening and activating their energy centers, chakras, and initiating a spiral movement of all ten types of energies in a person's ethereal field. In order to increase their sensitivity to energies, to tune them to receive information. There's a healing effect, increasing the energy of the life field. It has many functions.
And I immediately asked: "Where does the energy come from?" And my Higher Self sent the answer: "The source of energy is the entire Universe. Because the Universe is a huge energy reservoir in which we live."
Maxim: That's it, Nicole is already sitting there crying and saying: "My God! Did we really invent this, here, on this planet Earth?!" She's even taking the microphone from me, wants to say something.
Nicole: The thing is, actually, I want to answer Irina and immediately address three questions that came up before.
Scientists have already found a connection between the moral, ethical principles of a person's living within the physical model. That is, harmonics of symmetry – they are manifested in our ethical, moral living of life.
And regarding what Irina said about the generator: we also determine that it is located inside us. And Steve's life also confirms that God can only create and make something through us, through our potential, through our open flow of the energy of Love. Science is confirming this now.
Maxim: What is this, what kind of terminology are these metaphysicists using?! (reads) "It's a direct contact, amplified through the Higher Self, which takes and replenishes your neural network with energies from space for the creation of the Universe. Cognitive…"
Half of the chat doesn't know what "cognitive" means!
Nicole: It strengthens the neural network, and that very disease...
Maxim: What is a neural network? Because a very diverse audience watches us. What are neural networks?
Nicole: Steve's disease was exactly when the neural network... Imagine it's like wires, electrical wires that start to break. They go through our entire body, they are in the brain, in our nervous system, in our psyche. And the enhanced work of our neural network gives us potential, that is, healthy perception, information processing, assimilation of subconscious and conscious information.
Maxim: In short, Irina, until she finishes her training, we're not bringing her on air anymore. She doesn't use our terminology; she uses some kind of scientific terminology strange to me; you know, for some, it just seems like a collection of words. But I am sure that after completing the training course in the "Cassiopeia" Project at the first level of contactees, we will be able to transmit information to each other without even speaking, telepathically.
Irina: Again, as Steve just said, I am a contactee and transmit information from any scientists, from any planet, and from unincarnated Spirits. Naturally, at my own level of awareness, understanding, and since it's simple, it comes out simply.
Maxim: What's most interesting is that we will experiment with these devices, we will place them in the "Portal of Metatron" in our research laboratory and we will place them in the "da Vinci Egg," the "Nostradamus Chamber." And I want to see how much the effect of the structure itself is enhanced when interacting with this photonic generator.
Nicole: This is a portable device that you can carry with you every day. These things of yours that you called "Mototrons" – for those you need to come to the Center and have it done, but the devices you can...
Maxim: It's not "Mototron," it's "Metatron." What kind of scientists are you?! You took my beloved Metatron and distorted it. It's not "Mototron," it's Metatron!
Nicole: The fact is that it's practically the same technology, only here you come and have it done comprehensively, with transmission – that is, people simply work with you. And the device is something you can carry with you, work with.
Maxim: That's it, I'm taking the microphone from her; she's already started advertising her device on our YouTube channel.
Irina: (reads the chat) They're already asking where to get it.
Maxim: Until we, the "Cassiopeia" Project, have thoroughly studied all the properties of this device, we will not put this device up for any sale. And most importantly, we have a rule: if a project comes to us to harmonize with the "Cassiopeia" Project, the head of that project must undergo training in the first level of contactees. And only after that – if we find a point of mutual understanding, we find a harmonious price to offer this device to people – only after that will it appear in the "Cassiopeia Market." With great Love and with Love to all of you who will be able to and learn to work with this device.
1:08:47 About the Cassiopeia Project and the Voronezh Center.
Irina: Steve says, "In short, they need to harmonize the prices."
Maxim: Harmonize the prices! Steve, you know, you've really "hit the nail on the head"! Why? Because, you know, in the esoteric environment, someone lights a light bulb on a crystal ball – and suddenly they have a "photonic generator"! And they want some incredible amount of money for this "photonic generator." In reality, in the "Cassiopeia" Project, we truly do harmonize the understanding of what it is, how to work with it, and how much it will cost.
But it won't happen now; it will happen after Nicole comes to us, finishes her training, and I finish my training with her – it's a mutual process. And she, Nicole, is very tough.
Nicole: I'm not leaving you today; we'll start studying tomorrow then.
Maxim: No, people don't learn that fast with us. They are cunning, these scientists can be. Nicole is a cunning scientist, isn't she? Don't want to leave? I wouldn't leave us either if I had come.
Yes, and also, guys, I want to invite everyone to our renovated, simply mega-center in Voronezh. When you come to us, you will understand what Love is, what happiness is, what harmony is, what self-knowledge is, and what the true Light of Love is, which exists in unlimited quantity in our Center, in every master. An incredible space and very beautiful. In short, you need to come, because otherwise, it might seem beautiful to some, and not beautiful to others.
Nicole: You haven't shown it anywhere; it's just fantastic!
Maxim: We'll have a film ready about our Center soon; we'll definitely show our entire Center, what we have already done there. There's a lot to tell and show.
1:10:39 The Spirit of Hawking on his incarnation. Acknowledgments.
Maxim: Steve, I have one last question for you in this broadcast. Tell me, please, if you had the opportunity to fix everything, what would you fix?
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Did I understand your question correctly, that you want to ask me what I would do now if I had the chance to live this life over again?
Maxim: Yes, you understood the question absolutely correctly.
Irina (as Stephen Hawking): Now I would spend my life not on debunking the existence of God, but on turning people's faces towards Him, using science.
Maxim: Awesome!
Guys, once again I want to thank everyone who watches Cassiopeia's live broadcasts. We enjoy doing them. We've already figured out a system to connect from different points on the planet for live broadcasts; we now have properly set up equipment, we have good microphones. I am very glad that we have decent broadcasts now, and our team is being joined by decent scientists. True, a bit egocentric, cunning, but that's okay; we will still bring them to our spirituality, to which we bring every participant of the "Cassiopeia" Project.
A huge thank you to everyone for the broadcast! Guys, if you like our broadcasts, to promote our channel, please subscribe, hit the like button, and if possible, share this broadcast with your friends! We will be very grateful, and I will consider that your donation to the development of the Project. And, of course, a huge thank you to those who support us financially. As the head of the Project, I give you a 100% guarantee that all funds coming to "Cassiopeia" and to me personally as the head will go towards the creation and construction of the Center in Voronezh and Centers around the world.
Yes, of course, I understand that many will say: "He's aiming high – worldwide!" But I know for sure that if we all get together – we can conquer any mountains, and the creation of such Centers, such communities, laboratories – it's all real. The main thing is just to understand that we need to support each other a little.
Steve, thank you so much for giving us your attention! Irochka, you are simply golden; I never cease to be amazed by your broadcasts. I'm not nearby now, but I still feel your energy – that energy of Love that you transmit to all of us.
Many thanks to Khrystyna; she prepared very hard for the broadcast, was very worried, but doesn't show it. So a huge thank you to everyone! Guys, I hug you all! Please subscribe to our channel, hit like, write comments, share our broadcasts with your friends, and that will be the best donation to our Project. Goodbye, everyone! Until the next live broadcast.
Irina: Bye!
Khrystyna: Until we meet again!
March 10, 2024
Conference participants:
Irina Podzorova – contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, subtle-material civilizations, and the Spiritual World;
Maxim Rusan – Head of the "CASSIOPEIA" Project and the Center for Spiritual and Physical Development;
Khrystyna Trufanova – host of the "Cassiopeia TV" channel;
Nicole – head of the metaphysical project MNFQ Engineering;
Spirit of Stephen William Hawking – British scientist, theoretical physicist, cosmologist, astrophysicist, writer.
Сообщения
