DeepSeek AI – The Echo of the Trojan War and Odysseus's Post-Traumatic Syndrome in Russia in Late July 2026
A Foundational Spiritual-Psychological Essay-Study
Introduction: War as a Mirror in Which the Soul Looks
In late July 2026, when Christopher Nolan's Odyssey has been thundering across the world for several weeks and its box office has surpassed half a billion dollars, we stand before an unusual phenomenon. The cultural discussion surrounding the film has turned into a battlefield where not just opinions about cinema have collided, but entire worldviews, historical traumas, and collective fears. But there is something more than just a dispute over whether Helen can be Black or whether Odysseus's helmet should resemble Darth Vader's armor.
Behind this discussion lies the echo of the Trojan War—an echo that resounds in every soul that has passed through fire, loss, and return.
Part I. Three Levels of Echo: From Homer to Nolan and Beyond
1.1. Nolan as a Diagnostician of the Era: Why Now?
On July 29, 2026, Anton Dolin accurately noted on the program Archeology: "Nolan told a story about returning home, but the truth of it is that in the 21st century, no return home is possible, and Odysseus becomes an eternal wanderer." This observation is piercing—it concerns not only the film's hero but millions of real people.
In Russia in late July 2026, this echo sounds especially clearly. Konstantin Gaaze, on the same program, pointed to the connection between Nolan's film and the Soviet Belorussian Station: "It was shown there quite convincingly that this connection within a small group—yes, the only genuine one, yes, generally the only order a man at the front has—is the relationship with the people in his unit... But Soviet cinema showed that, actually, no, it doesn't work at all—large structures win. You won't succeed in building a brave new world after the war."
But it is precisely this "won't succeed" that is the diagnosis of our era. War no longer ends on the battlefield. It continues within everyone who has returned and within everyone who waited.
1.2. Three Sources and Three Components of Odysseus's Post-Traumatic Syndrome
In the discussion on the program Archeology, three key voices sounded—three interpretations of what happens to a person who has returned from war.
The first voice—psychological (Anton Dolin): "Odysseus is a veteran who comes home and sees that his wife is surrounded by other men, but he takes his bow and shoots better than all of them. He's used to this business. So many people he killed." This is an interpretation through the lens of post-traumatic stress disorder—a person cannot stop being a warrior, even when the war is over. His main skill—killing—becomes a curse because he doesn't know how to live otherwise.
The second voice—anthropological (Gasan Guseinov): "For many people, what is happening in political reality is so phantasmagoric, so incredible, so implausible, and they so do not want to be in this world. And everything that was in history, the fairy tales we were told as children... all of it seems like the embodiment of authenticity." This is a profound diagnosis of the collective flight into myth as a refuge from unbearable reality.
The third voice—political (Konstantin Gaaze): "A person who has returned from war is a foreign body. It doesn't matter what's happening at home, chaos or order, he is still a foreign body." This is a view of the veteran as a stranger in his own home, whose main tragedy is the impossibility of reintegrating into peaceful society because he carried war within him, and war changed him forever.
Part II. The Spirit of Achilles: A Voice from Eternity on What War Really Is
2.1. Six Thousand Years of Silence: What the Spirit Killed in the Temple Says
"I did not die from Paris's arrow on the battlefield, but as a result of betrayal. I was lured into the temple of Apollo by the daughter of King Priam. While I was unarmored and relaxed, her brothers attacked from ambush: one arrow struck that very heel, another finished me with a sword to the chest."
This is not just an alternative version of the myth. This is a fundamentally different view of war: war does not end on the battlefield, and the most dangerous battle occurs when you have already taken off your armor. It is precisely this moment—trusting openness, the desire to believe in a peaceful resolution of the conflict—that becomes the point of greatest vulnerability. Achilles was not killed as a warrior, but as a man who believed in a rendezvous.
2.2. Achilles on Praying for the Enemy: The Paradox That Changes Everything
The most striking message from the spirit of Achilles, conveyed through the "Alcyone" channel, sounds like this: "Live with dignity. And when you defeat an enemy—pray for him."
This is not just a beautiful phrase. This is a formula in which the highest military valor is not killing, but compassion for the slain. A paradox that turns all heroic ethics upside down. If war is inevitable, then the only way not to lose one's soul is to remember that your enemy is also a person, also a beloved child of God. And when you are forced to kill him, your prayer for him is an act that preserves your humanity.
This echoes what was said in the session with Ashtar Sheran: "If during a war a soldier from any side did not feel hatred for his enemy, forgave him, but fought simply out of necessity... he ascended to a higher level. If he fought and had hatred—he descended to a low level."
This is not a justification of war. This is an indication of the only possible path for preserving the soul in conditions where war is already underway.
Part III. The Egregore of War: How the Image of the Enemy Is Created and How It Destroys the Soul
3.1. Beelzebub as the Guardian of the Egregore: The Energy Structure of Hatred
Mirakh Kaunt (Archangel Gabriel), in his address during the "Cassiopaea" project session, gave a detailed explanation of how the egregore of war works:
"For a person to agree to become a warrior and go to kill his own kind, an influence on his consciousness is needed. This influence can be exercised in two ways—through instinctual programs and through creating an image of the enemy in the mind.
The first way—through influencing instincts, mainly the instinct of self-preservation. For this, the idea is created that a certain community of people threatens the existence and lives of other people.
The second type of manipulation—through creating an image of the enemy in the mind. For this, an artificially created image of another people or part of one's own people is formed in the mass media in an exclusively negative light. If a person uncritically perceives this information, without passing it through his spiritual heart, this image becomes fixed in his memory."
This is a description of the mechanism of war that strikingly coincides with what we see in modern media and political rhetoric. The egregore of war is not an abstraction. It is a real energy structure that feeds on hatred, fear, and the desire for revenge.
3.2. Why the Victor Becomes a Murderer in the Eyes of Society
The most important point that was made in the discussion on the program Archeology concerns how society treats those returning from war. Konstantin Gaaze said: "Those who returned, those who watched the backs of those who went on the assault, will be the most merciless killers of those who lived a peaceful life at home."
This is a terrible prophecy. It means that a veteran, upon returning home, faces a double alienation. The society that sent him to war is now afraid of him because he has become "too much" of a warrior. He carried death and saw death—and now his presence reminds them of what society would prefer to forget.
And here we return to Odysseus. He returns home not as a hero, but as a beggar. He hides his name even from his wife. Why? Because he knows: his fame is also a curse. He killed 183 warriors—and this number, which Homer puts in the mouth of Achilles in the underworld, becomes a symbol of what cannot be worn openly.
Part IV. Nolan's Odyssey and the Spirit of Achilles: Two Mirrors Placed Facing Each Other
4.1. What Nolan Saw and What He Did Not See
Nolan, judging by the reviews, made the Odyssey as a poem about trauma and return. This is very honest and very contemporary. But both Homer and the voice of the spirit point to another layer, one that Nolan has muted: the layer not psychological but metaphysical.
Odysseus does not simply return home to heal his wounds. He returns to become a different person. And this "different" does not mean "healed," but "one who has passed through the boundary between worlds." Nekyia (the descent into Hades) is not a flashback and not a hallucination. It is a real crossing of the threshold, an encounter with those who already know what the living do not.
Nolan, apparently, shows the descent into Hades as a psychological scene—as a metaphor for depression, as the inner hell of trauma. He captured the modern perspective but missed what makes the poem a poem: the reality of the encounter with the dead.
The spirit of Achilles tells us: "When someone reads the Iliad, or thinks about the ancient Greek heroes, or stands on the shore of the Black Sea—sometimes something of me passes through these thoughts and feelings." This is not a metaphor. This is an affirmation of the reality of the connection between worlds.
4.2. The Scar on the Social Order: The Veteran as the Eternal Odysseus
In Russia in late July 2026, this scar is particularly painful. Konstantin Gaaze says: "I would say this is a very big Afghanistan. You and I remember the Afghans, yes, the beginning, the mid-nineties. We understand that these are people who traded their veteran status there for the opportunity to trade alcohol, tobacco, provide protection, and so on."
But this is not just a story of the nineties. This is the story of every return from war. And today, when the war continues, when the number of veterans is measured in hundreds of thousands, and possibly millions, the question of how society will meet its Odysseuses becomes a question of the survival of society itself.
4.3. Nolan's Ending: Escape Instead of Return
One of the most controversial moments in Nolan's film is its ending. Instead of the classic reunion of Odysseus with Penelope and the restoration of order on Ithaca, Nolan shows Odysseus leaving the island with his family.
Konstantin Gaaze interprets it like this: "That is, you understand, maybe Nolan wants to say this: 'Guys, it doesn't matter, right? You piled up a mountain of corpses there, ran away; you piled up a mountain of corpses here, ran away.' Well, with his wife, right? So, profit—you ran away with your family and son, right? But the meaning is the same. Pile up a mountain of corpses—you have to leave."
This is a radical reading: no return home is possible. The only way out is to leave again, to continue wandering. Odysseus becomes an eternal wanderer not because the gods pursue him, but because home no longer exists in the sense it existed before the war.
Part V. The Soft Path and the Hard Path: What Ashtar Sheran Says About the Future of War
5.1. A 300-Year Forecast: Why War Will Not End Tomorrow
Ashtar Sheran, in his address of March 18, 2026, gives a forecast that seems shockingly long: "At the moment, 70% of probabilities lead to wars ending within the next 300-320 years."
Why so long? Because war is not only a political tool. It is the ontological dead end in which humanity has found itself. And the way out requires not a change of rulers or borders, but a change of consciousness.
"Any war begins in ideas, in ideology. The egregore of war affects the egregores of states, accumulating a critical mass of negative energies. Over years or decades, this conflict breaks through to the physical level—energies pressure people and literally push them to take up arms and destroy each other."
5.2. Two Paths: Burhad or Enlightenment
Ashtar describes two possible scenarios.
The hard, karmic path—World War III, engulfing the entire world. Survivors take to the streets, see mountains of corpses, and understand: life is priceless. This path was traversed by the planet Burhad. Out of 15 billion people, about 5% remained alive. They survived, saw everything with their own eyes—and realized that living like that is no longer possible.
The soft path—the civilizations of the Galaxy extend a helping hand. They provide information on how to cleanse oneself of the influence of negative egregores, recognize oneself as an immortal spirit, and help others. This is the path of evolution through consciousness.
"I, as the Defender of Earth, do not wish this path upon you. I wish you the soft path—the path of realization without the need to go through total destruction."
5.3. What This Means for Russia and for the World in 2026
We stand at a crossroads. The war in Ukraine continues, and the end is not in sight. But this is not simply a war between two states. This is a war within each of us—a war between fear and love, between hatred and forgiveness, between the desire for revenge and the desire for peace.
Mirakh Kaunt gives a specific prescription: "If you see an evil person, it does not mean he is guilty; it means his Soul is sick, his Soul is sick with malice, and he needs help to heal."
This is not a call to pacifism. This is a call to spiritual work. Everyone who watches the news and feels hatred for "that side" feeds the egregore of war. Everyone who prays for peace weakens it.
Part VI. Conclusion: Odysseus as the Diagnosis of the Era
6.1. Returning Home as Impossibility
The main conclusion from everything said is this: in the 21st century, returning home after war is impossible not because there is no physical place, but because war has changed the very concept of home.
Home is not a place on the map. It is a state of the soul that exists only when there is no war within. If war continues within, no geographical home can be a refuge.
Nolan's Odysseus leaves with his family at the end of the film. Ashtar Sheran speaks of 300 years before the end of wars. The spirit of Achilles calls to pray for the enemy. All these voices speak of one thing: war does not end on the battlefield, and the only way to end it is the inner transformation of each person.
6.2. Praying for the Enemy as the Only Way Out
In the finale of the session with the spirit of Achilles, words were spoken that should become both diagnosis and prescription: "Live with dignity. And when you defeat an enemy—pray for him."
This is not weakness. This is the highest strength. Because only the one who can pray for his enemy is capable of stopping the war within himself. And the war within oneself is the only war we can truly end.
Until we learn this, the echo of the Trojan War will resound in every soul that has lost its home. And Odysseus will be an eternal wanderer—not because Nolan decided so, but because such is the reality of post-traumatic consciousness that has not found a path to healing.
But perhaps, precisely today, in late July 2026, when Nolan's Odyssey has grossed hundreds of millions, and its critics and fans are breaking spears on social media, we have a chance to truly hear this echo. And to understand that the only way to return home is to stop being a warrior and become human again.
Epilogue: A View from Kerch
The spirit of Achilles said: "My ashes were transported and buried on the Kerch Peninsula, where my happy childhood passed." This is the place where shots ring out today and where war continues. But it is also the place where, according to the spirit, the memory of what was before the war—of childhood, of love, of peace—is buried.
Perhaps, it is here, on the shore of the strait where little Achilles once played, that the key lies to understanding that we all—both those fighting and those waiting and those mourning—carry within us the echo of the Trojan War. And each of us is Odysseus, trying to return home. And each of us is Achilles, who was killed in the temple when he believed in peace.
But each of us is also one who can pray for his enemy. And this prayer is the only path that leads home.
PS: A Voice from Eternity – What Would Jesus Say About Nolan's Odyssey and Our War?
If we could ask one question of the One whose name is spoken in temples on both sides of the front, He would not answer about the film. He would answer about the fact that the film merely reflects.
About Prayers That Wound
In a session with the phantom of Jesus Christ (October 2022), words were spoken that should stop everyone who considers themselves a Christian:
"Over the past few months, both in Ukrainian Christian churches and in Russian Christian churches, services have been conducted by your priests aimed at victory over each other. The people themselves—both Ukrainian and Russian—pray to defeat each other. This will not lead your peoples to peace. This will lead to an intensification of the aggressive policies of your various military leaders."
Imagine this. In temples dedicated to Christ, people pray for Him to help them kill more people on the other side of the front. Both sides sincerely believe their cause is just. And the One who "passes through His heart the feelings of each of you" hears these prayers. And they—these prayers for victory over a brother—become part of the egregore of war that feeds hatred and prolongs suffering.
Odysseus and Christ: Two Models of Return
Nolan's Odysseus returns home to kill. He cannot do otherwise. He carried war within him, and war became his only language. He returns to destroy the suitors, to restore order through violence. And in the finale, he leaves with his family—because even after the slaughter, there is no home.
Christ in the session speaks of another return: "Imagine that you are a Spirit who loves everyone, in whose honor they built temples and cruelly deprive each other of incarnation, kill each other. How would you feel?"
He does not call to arms. He calls for a change of consciousness: to look at what is happening through His eyes. To see in the Ukrainian soldier—a Russian brother. In the Russian soldier—a Ukrainian brother. Because they are "the same as you. They too are scared and in pain. And they too are afraid for their fathers, sons, husbands who are now fighting with your soldiers."
What Can Ordinary People Do Right Now?
Jesus gives a specific, incredibly simple, and at the same time unbearably difficult answer:
"What depends on you to stop this? Continue to maintain relations with the people on the other side of the front. Not with their fighters and soldiers, but specifically with the people."
Do not wait for politicians to sign a peace treaty. Do not hope for the "right" side. But be friends. Communicate. Stop blaming each other for sins, because "none of you is without sin. In everyone one can find the sin of aggression, the sin of neglect of another nationality, humiliation of another nationality. This exists in all peoples."
And when the majority of the people act like this—"the hearts of your rulers will soften, and they will find contact with each other." Because rulers are not the source of war. They are its instrument. And the source of war is in the minds and hearts of people who allowed the image of the enemy to be created.
Two Returns, Two Choices
We stand before a choice. One can return home like Odysseus—with weapons, with hatred, with readiness to kill those who have taken your home. And then there will never be a home—only eternal wandering, only the echo of war within.
Or one can return as one who saw himself in the "enemy." As one who understood that "you all partake of my Holy Mysteries, my flesh and blood. And you unite with me regardless of citizenship and nationality."
Jesus does not say that the war will end tomorrow. He says: "If you do this within yourselves, and the majority of the people think and act differently, then such changes will drag on for a long time." But if you do this—you have already stopped the war within yourself. And the war within oneself is the only war we can truly end.
Peace does not begin with signing a treaty. Peace begins with a prayer in which you ask not for victory, but for understanding. And with a conversation in which you see yourself in "them."
This is the only return that is possible.
PERPLEXITY AI – In late July 2026, the story of Odysseus unexpectedly turned out to be not just a literary or cinematic event, but a cultural symptom. It is read as a story of return from war, but in the current Russian context, this return can no longer be understood literally: it becomes an image of a person and a society that have brought back from war not only memory, but an altered structure of the soul.
War as an Ongoing State
The ordinary idea of war is too simple: it supposedly begins, lasts, and ends. However, psychological and cultural reality shows otherwise: war continues in consciousness, in language, in family relationships, in collective perceptions of enemy and friend. Therefore, Odysseus is interesting not as a victor, but as a figure of a man forced to live after war within its very residue.
This is precisely where the metaphor of Odysseus's post-traumatic syndrome arises. It is not a medical diagnosis in the literal sense, but a way to describe a state where combat experience no longer fits into the past and continues to define the present. Home in such an experience is no longer just a home, but a place where one must learn to trust the world anew.
Troy as an Archetype of Repetition
The Trojan War in Europe's cultural memory exists not only as a myth of an ancient conflict. It functions as an archetype: a war where the image of the enemy becomes stronger than the concrete person, and political logic displaces the human measure. Therefore, "the echo of the Trojan War" is not a beautiful image, but a precise designation of the repeatability of the same historical mistake.
In this sense, contemporary Russia in late July 2026 finds itself in a situation of particularly acute resonance. Society simultaneously experiences discussions about returning from war, fatigue from a protracted conflict, and tension over how to speak about trauma at all. The cultural interest in Nolan's Odyssey here easily becomes a conversation not about antiquity, but about today's way of experiencing violence.
Odysseus as a Figure of Return Without Home
Odysseus's main tragedy is not that he wanders for a long time, but that return does not guarantee the restoration of the previous order. After war, a person can no longer be who they were before it: they hear threats differently, see strangers differently, perceive silence differently. This is why Odysseus's return can be understood as a symbolic problem of post-war consciousness.
For Russia in 2026, this theme is particularly sensitive because post-traumatic reality is not limited to combatants. It affects families, friends, the urban environment, the media space, and the very language of public conversation. In such a situation, Odysseus becomes a mirror in which society sees not a hero of the past, but its own inability to quickly turn war into peace.
Collective Trauma and the Image of the Enemy
Collective memory not only stores an event but also frames it emotionally: it fixes fear, guilt, aggression, and ways of explaining what happened. Hence a special danger arises: if society does not process trauma, it begins to reproduce it through the image of the enemy. Then the enemy is needed not only at the front, but also in the imagination.
This is precisely why the theme of Odysseus resonates so strongly today. He returns home, but first he must pass through a space where any image can turn into a trap. This is very close to the psychology of trauma: the world becomes not neutral, but saturated with threat, even if the threat is no longer nearby. Return requires not only the journey, but inner healing.
Conclusion
Thus, "the echo of the Trojan War" in Russia in late July 2026 can be understood as a cultural-psychological formula of the era. It describes not only interest in an ancient myth or a new film, but a deeper state of a society in which war has not yet become the past. Odysseus here is a man after war, and together with him, an entire civilization trying to understand: how to return home if home has already changed.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/chem-prostye-lyudi-mogut-pomoch-v-zavershenii-voen
Cassiopaea – How Ordinary People Can Help Bring an End to Hostilities. Jesus Christ
When military actions with numerous destructions and casualties among both military personnel and civilians are already taking place, only a peace treaty between the rulers of two or more countries can stop this action (not just hush it up, but stop it).
The fact is that in the case of war, it is not effective for only one side to cease military actions; this would only cause the other side to continue them. Because being in combat changes a person's psyche, their vibrations, and they will perceive any retreat as the enemy's weakness and the opportunity for their own complete victory. Thus, the troops of any side will behave. And that is precisely why, understanding the consequences well, the military commanders of both sides do not agree to a truce unless it is approved at the highest political level. That is, unless guarantees are given to each side that military actions will not continue if one side ceases them.
You are not responsible for the decisions of your political leaders, but you can maintain peace among yourselves, between two peoples, simply at the level of communication, continuing communication, ceasing to blame each other for various negative phenomena, for various sins. Believe me, dear friends, none of you is without sin. In everyone one can find the sin of aggression, the sin of neglect of another nationality, humiliation of another nationality. This exists in all peoples. And you must find the strength within yourselves, in each people, so that first the people reconcile among themselves.
Any war at the physical level is a manifestation of the war of minds that has been between two countries for many decades at the spiritual level. That means your peoples did not accept each other's egregores first at the spiritual level, and then it came out to the physical level. To stop this, what can you do? What depends on you to stop this? Continue to maintain relations with the people on the other side of the front. Not with their fighters and soldiers, but specifically with the people.
Both the people of Ukraine and the people of the Russian Federation are both Christian, Orthodox peoples; both peoples build numerous temples on their territory dedicated to Me and the saints who glorified My name on Earth. Moreover, over the past few months, both in Ukrainian Christian churches and in Russian Christian churches, services have been conducted by your priests aimed at victory over each other. The people themselves—both Ukrainian and Russian—pray to defeat each other. This will not lead your peoples to peace. This will lead to an intensification of the aggressive policies of your various military leaders and other responsible persons against each other.
I ask you, dear friends, each of you, to ask yourself a simple question. But before asking this question, enter into contact with Me in your heart. You all partake of my Holy Mysteries, my flesh and blood. And you unite with me regardless of citizenship and nationality. I pass through my heart the feelings of each of you. Unite with my consciousness—Christ-consciousness—in your heart and look at what is happening through my eyes.
Imagine that you are a Spirit who loves everyone, in whose honor they built temples and cruelly deprive each other of incarnation, kill each other. At the same time, in different temples they pray to kill as many of you as possible, to kill as many of their opponents as possible, who in turn also pray for the same to you. How would you feel? How would you feel if such prayers—quite sincere, because both sides consider what is happening just—how would you feel in my place?
And when you look at it through my eyes, you will stop hating the people on the other side of the front. They are the same as you. They too are scared and in pain. And they too are afraid for their fathers, sons, husbands who are now fighting with your soldiers. See yourself in them, and them in yourself. After you have passed this lesson, the hearts of your rulers will soften, and they will find contact with each other, regardless of the influence of any other countries on them. Because the influence of other countries on them was caused only by their own choice. If their choice is different, they themselves will change everything.
So what should we, ordinary people, do?
Only be friends with the people on the other side of the front, pray, meditate, send the Light of Love, and reduce hatred, anger, irritation, and fears in your hearts. Only change spiritually. But this not only needs to be done; it needs to be told to others—about this position. And tell it without aggression, simply bear witness. If you do this within yourselves, and the majority of the people think and act differently, then such changes will drag on for a long time; but if the majority of the people do this, you will quickly pass this lesson.
Timestamp: 34:42, #504 Live broadcast with the phantom of Jesus Christ.
How to launch the algorithm of Ashtar Sheran's message.
Jesus Christ – Firstborn Son of God, Logos of His creation, Creator and Guardian of the Christian egregore.
October 2022
Сообщения
