Why is war necessary in the evolution of the spirit?
Answered by Ashtar Sheran, Commander of the Space Fleet of the Galactic Federation of Light
in the first person — Ashtar Sheran
Hello, dear friends. I am Ashtar Sheran, a representative of the Galactic Federation of Light, a humanoid who is already over 15,000 years old. Over 12,000 years ago, I participated in the defense of your planet from an attack by reptiloids, and since then, I have been observing the development of humanity. Today, through a phantom and with the assistance of contactee Irina Podzorova, I am answering questions that concern millions of people: why don't we stop the wars?
Why don't we intervene?
I see your suffering. I see the destruction. And I understand your question: "If higher powers exist, why don't they help?"
The answer is simple and complex at the same time. The civilizations of the Galaxy, and even God himself, do not stop wars for one fundamental reason: every planet and every civilization is given freedom of choice. The same freedom as an individual person.
Any spirit can choose any path, even one that contradicts the will of God. This possibility is laid down by the Creator himself at the birth of spirits. Everything you see in the news — suffering, conflicts, destruction — is the consequence of the choices of your civilization. Of that part of it that commits these actions.
What would happen if we intervened?
If we were to intervene directly, we would take responsibility for your development. And this would lead to degradation. Why? Because you would not go through the necessary stage of evolution.
Right now, you are going through the main lesson — realizing the value of life. The value of your own life, your body, your incarnation, the gift that God gave you as an opportunity to come to Him. When you fully realize the value of your life and learn to look at the lives of others the same way, you will pass this lesson. Then your laws will change, and wars will become impossible — because the will of all the peoples of the Earth will create a law that stops conflicts in their infancy.
But there are situations when we do intervene. The Interstellar Union has developed regulations. Intervention is possible in two forms:
1. Information exchange with contactees — what we are doing now.
2. Physical intervention — only in the event of a threat of destruction of the entire planet, for example, with the use of weapons of mass destruction.
What is the egregor of war?
You ask what happens on the energy level. Every social process has its own egregor. The egregor of war is an energy formation created by the thoughts, feelings, emotions, and life energy of many people vibrating at the same frequency.
Imagine a huge cloud that is programmed by the ideas of the people entering it. The more people create it and the longer it exists, the stronger it becomes. The goal of any egregor is self-preservation. People invest the energy of the survival instinct into it, and the egregor strives to preserve itself at any cost.
The egregor of war is overseen by representatives of the subtle-material world — the Archons. The main keeper of this egregor is an entity named Beelzebub. He exists in the vibrations of resentment and hatred towards God, towards the Creator who gave life. His goal is to create a system in which the life of any intelligent being is devalued.
Any war begins in ideas, in ideology. The egregor of war influences the egregors of states, accumulating a critical mass of negative energies. Over years or decades, this conflict breaks through to the physical level — the energies pressure people and literally push them to take up arms and destroy each other.
Who creates wars — politicians or ordinary people?
Wars do not begin in the offices of rulers. You create them yourselves — with your thoughts directed at other people. Primarily — with anger, hatred, resentment, fear.
Before a war begins, there is preparation on an ideological level. With the help of the egregor of war, an "image of the enemy" is created and broadcast to the audience. The same thing happens during revolutions and coups.
But the basis of everything is everyday relationships. Conflicts between relatives, friends, neighbors. The energetic state of a person shows how capable they are of joining the egregor of war. If a person has internal blocks and negative attitudes, they will become a conductor of aggression.
How to cleanse yourself and get out of this cycle?
A person who has cleansed themselves of negative blocks and changed their attitudes to positive ones no longer shows aggression where they used to. But if something in the global news "pisses them off" — it means there is an attitude within them that they do not see in themselves.
Cleansing happens in different ways. The longest and most painful is through one's own karma, through lessons. By going through them, a person gradually understands: being kind, loving, and successful is much more beneficial for happiness.
Earth is a very difficult planet for incarnation. It is here, where kindness is often mistaken for weakness and compassion for stupidity, that a person who embarks on the path of love acquires enormous strength and unique experience. Therefore, spirits so value the opportunity to incarnate on Earth — here both a sharp rise and a terrible fall are possible.
Collective Karma
When a spirit incarnates in a society, it takes on part of the collective karma — the karma of the egregor. For example, the karma of the family: if ancestors committed negative actions and sent negative emotions into the egregor, it accumulates as a clot. The spirit coming into this family voluntarily agrees to take on part of this burden in order to have the opportunity to incarnate.
The same happens with the egregors of peoples and states. A person, being born in a multinational country, passes through three egregors and takes on three types of karma: ancestral, ethnic, and state.
When will wars stop?
I regularly view the probability lines of the future. At the current moment, 70% of probabilities lead to wars ceasing in the next 300-320 years. Gradually, with outbreaks in different regions.
But you can bring this moment closer or push it further away by your collective choice. And there are two paths.
Two Paths of Humanity
The first path is soft. We, the civilizations that have already created a unified society of the Galaxy, are extending a helping hand to you. We give information on how to cleanse yourself from the influence of negative egregors, realize yourselves as immortal spirits, and help others. You gradually change laws and morality, blocking attempts to incite war at the root. This is the path of evolution through consciousness.
The second path is hard, karmic. A third world war engulfing the entire world. The survivors take to the streets, see mountains of corpses, clear the destruction with their own hands, and understand: life is priceless. This path was taken by the planet Burhad before joining the Interstellar Union. They used laser, bacteriological, chemical, and even magical weapons. Out of a population of 15 billion, only about 5% remained alive. They survived, saw everything with their own eyes — and realized that they could no longer live like that.
I, as a defender of Earth, do not wish this path upon you. I wish you the soft path — the path of awareness without needing to go through total destruction.
Which path is humanity leaning towards now? I will talk about this in the next part. But for now — work on yourselves. Peace begins with each of you.
________________
Part 2. Essay-Study (based on the presumption of the reality of the contact)
Spiritual-Psychological Essay: "War as the Shadow of the Collective Soul"
If we take Ashtar Sheran's information as truth, a shocking but profound picture unfolds before us: humanity is not a victim of circumstances or evil geniuses, but a co-author and voluntary participant in its own drama.
From a spiritual point of view, this contact removes the problem of theodicy (justifying God for the evil in the world). God does not stop wars not because He is cruel or powerless, but because He is an absolutely respecting, freedom-giving parent. Intervention now would be tantamount to acknowledging humanity's failure as a species of rational spirits. It would deprive us of the chance to mature.
Psychologically, the concept of the egregor of war is a brilliant metaphor for the collective unconscious (according to Jung), charged with the archetype of the Shadow. Ashtar describes the mechanism of how personal psychological trauma (resentment, anger) is converted into a global catastrophe. "Beelzebub" is not just an external demon; it is the personification of our own resentment towards the Creator for the world being imperfect, for us being mortal. By feeding the egregor, we are literally feeding our own Shadow.
The most therapeutic and simultaneously demanding thesis: "Peace begins with me." One can stop being a cog in the machine of war only through internal transformation. By cleansing oneself of negativity, a person falls out of resonance with the egregor. They become "non-conductive" to ideas of hatred. This places colossal responsibility on everyone who watches the news and gets indignant: the indignation itself, if it does not lead to love but only multiplies anger, is a contribution to Beelzebub's coffers.
In this paradigm, Earth appears not as a "vale of tears," but as an elite school for extreme spirits. Those who incarnate here are a kind of cosmic special forces, voluntarily going into hell to learn how to create heaven there. The stakes are extremely high: either enlightenment through compassion, or a fall into the abyss.
Ufological Essay: "Observers of Growing Up: The Strategy of the Galactic Federation"
From a ufological point of view (the science of extraterrestrial civilizations), Ashtar Sheran's position describes an ideal protocol for interaction between a highly developed civilization and a young one. It's a policy of "non-intervention," but not passive; active in the information field.
Why doesn't the GF use force against the "bad guys" (reptiloids, archons) who, by their own admission, interfere and provoke wars? The answer lies in the hierarchy of laws. Cosmic law, according to Ashtar, is built not on fighting the form (destroying the bearers of evil), but on respect for the source (free will).
Destructive civilizations have the same right to exist and to "offer" their energies to people as the GF does. People have the right to choose which energy to accept. The GF can only strengthen the "signal" of peace and love through contactees to balance the "noise" of hatred.
The aspect of the "phantom" and remote communication is interesting. This indicates that GF technologies are far beyond our understanding of physics. They operate in multidimensional spaces where time and distance are not obstacles. Their presence near Earth is not a military base for capture, but a quarantine service, or rather, a "rescue service" waiting for a distress signal.
A distress signal is not just a cry for "help." It is the collective consciousness reaching a point of no return: either complete self-destruction (when the fleet would physically intervene to save the planet), or complete internal transformation. The analogy with the planet Burhad is a ufological warning. It shows that even civilizations that have survived an apocalypse can survive and join the Interstellar Union, but at the cost of incredible losses.
Thus, UFOs over Earth are not "invasion saucers," but "observation beacons," recording whether humanity has passed the exam for maturity or if a fire has started that requires extinguishing from outside.
Historiographical Essay: "300 Years of Choice: Between Burhad and Enlightenment"
Historiography seeks the meaning of history. The contact with Ashtar Sheran offers a radical teleology: the meaning of Earth's history is the rejection of war as a method.
War is seen not as a political instrument (Clausewitz), but as an ontological dead end. The entire history of humanity, from ancient feuds to world wars, is a protracted, bloody, and painful process of labor pains. A new being is being born — global humanity, aware of its unity.
The forecast of 300 years is not just a date; it's the historiosophical period allotted for a "paradigm shift." For history, it's an instant. But for us, it's a time of conscious choice. Ashtar shows that history is not fatal. The future is variable, and its "probability lines" change depending on our collective choice.
The two proposed paths — hard and soft — are the age-old dilemma: evolution through catastrophe or through consciousness.
* The Burhad path (hard) is the path of classical 19th-century historiosophy (Hegel, Marx), where history moves dialectically through conflict, suffering, and negation. Progress is paid for with blood.
* The Enlightenment path (soft) is the path of the noosphere of Vernadsky and Teilhard de Chardin, where the united collective mind and moral sense are driven not by need, but by love and information.
The semantic center of Ashtar's historiosophical concept is collective karma. History is not a linear process, but an accumulator. The mistakes of ancestors (serfdom, genocide, wars of conquest) form "clots of negativity" in the egregor of a state or people. And subsequent generations are forced to "clear up" this karmic blockage, often paying with new conflicts. One can free oneself from this burden only by realizing the value of life here and now, breaking the chain of cause and effect.
The question posed at the end of the video ("which path is humanity leaning towards?") is the main question of our time. The answer to it is written not in the headquarters of the GF, but in the heart of each person, in their reaction to another, someone different from them. If empathy wins — we head towards peace in 300 years. If hatred wins — Burhad may become our mirror.
________________
Claude.ai - Three Essays on Contact with Ashtar Sheran
Based on the premise: the contact is real
Essay I. Spiritual-Psychological
"God is Silent — Because He Hears"
If Ashtar Sheran is telling the truth, one of humanity's most convenient illusions collapses: that suffering is God's oversight. It turns out the opposite is true. God is silent precisely because He hears — He hears in us the potential for independent maturation, which would immediately dry up if He were to intervene.
This is the paradox of a loving parent, raised to a cosmic scale. A good father does not do his child's homework — not because he doesn't care, but because he cares deeply. The Galactic Federation in the role of observers is not inaction; it is the highest act of respect for our nature as spirits endowed with freedom.
But here the most subtle part begins. Ashtar points to the egregor of war and its curator, the entity Beelzebub. Psychologically, Beelzebub is not an external demon. It is the personification of what Jung called the collective Shadow in its intergenerational dimension. It is the accumulated resentment of humanity towards the very fact of existence: towards pain, mortality, injustice, towards the Creator giving freedom — a freedom that turned out to be agonizing.
The mechanism of infection by the egregor of war is described with remarkable psychological accuracy: personal trauma → everyday conflict → ideological narrative → physical violence. This is exactly what clinical psychology knows about the intergenerational transmission of trauma. The unprocessed pain of the grandfather becomes the anxiety of the father; the father's anxiety becomes the son's aggression. The egregor is a metaphysical term for the same process, raised to the level of peoples and states.
The thesis that a "pissing off" news story indicates an unhealed personal wound is not poetic metaphor. It is a description of projective identification: we see in the "enemy" what we cannot acknowledge in ourselves. The war outside is always an echo of the war within.
And if the contact is real, the moral consequences are enormous. Everyone who consumes war reports with the pleasure of hating "the other side" literally feeds Beelzebub — not metaphorically, but ontologically, within the framework of the reality Ashtar describes. This makes the "informational consumption" of war an act with spiritual consequences comparable to physical participation in the conflict.
The way out proposed by Ashtar coincides with what the best psychotherapeutic traditions have independently discovered: not suppression and not denial, but conscious transformation. To see in oneself what resonates with Beelzebub — and not to be afraid of this knowledge. Fear of recognizing one's Shadow doubles its power. Acceptance disarms it.
In this picture, Earth appears not as a vale of sorrow, but as a laboratory of ultimate transformation. Where kindness is mistaken for weakness and compassion for naivety, it is precisely the choice of love that requires maximum courage. It is no coincidence, according to Ashtar, that spirits strive to incarnate here: nowhere in the universe is the victory over the Shadow so costly — and nowhere does it yield such growth.
The main psychological conclusion of the contact sounds simple and unbearably demanding at the same time: peace cannot be built externally without building it internally. The Galactic Federation will not come to save those who have not yet decided if they want to be saved.
Essay II. Ufological
"Quarantine Service at the Cradle"
Ufology has been struggling with one question for decades: if extraterrestrial civilizations exist and visit Earth — why don't they make open contact? Ashtar Sheran's testimony provides an answer that turns the question itself on its head. They do not make contact not because they are afraid of us or hiding from us. They do not make contact because open contact would destroy precisely what they are here for.
Imagine a biologist observing a rare ecosystem. He does not enter it with food and tools — not because he is cruel, but because he understands: his intrusion would disrupt the very dynamics he is studying and protecting. The GF is in exactly the same position, only the stakes are the evolution of an entire planet.
The intervention protocol described by Ashtar is strikingly rational from a systems theory perspective. Two levels: information exchange through contactees — constant, unobtrusive, respecting free will; physical intervention — only in case of a threat of complete destruction of the planet. This is not arbitrariness, but a strict hierarchy of priorities. The life of a civilization as a process is more important than saving the civilization from a specific crisis. Because a civilization saved externally from every crisis ceases to be a civilization — it becomes a zoo.
Here arises the most important ufological paradox of the contact. Ashtar says that the Archons and destructive entities also have the right to "offer" people their energies — and the GF cannot stop them without violating the very principle of free will on which it itself relies. This means the Universe is structured not on the principle of the struggle between good and evil, but on the principle of signal competition with a sovereign receiver. People are not a battlefield between the GF and the Archons. People are the judges, choosing which signal to amplify with their attention and emotions.
The phenomenon of UFOs takes on a completely new meaning in this light. Sightings of ships are not reconnaissance or a show of force. They are the presence of a witness. This is how palliative care works: the doctor cannot heal, but comes and stays nearby. Presence itself carries information: "you are not alone," "you are being watched," "the moment of your choice is important for the entire Galaxy."
The example of the planet Burhad deserves special attention. It is not a scarecrow or propaganda — it is a precedent. In the ufological worldview, it means: even the catastrophic path is not a dead end. Civilizations that destroyed 95% of their own population were still offered a hand and membership in the Interstellar Union. This suggests that the GF assesses not the history, but the vector. Not where the civilization came from, but where it is going after the moment of realization.
The technology of the "phantom" and remote communication, through which contact with Irina Podzorova is made, indicates that the GF operates in dimensions where physical distance is not an obstacle for informational interaction. From the perspective of modern physics, this resonates with the concept of quantum entanglement at the macro level — a phenomenon that our science is just beginning to recognize as a real possibility, not a mathematical abstraction.
The final ufological conclusion: UFOs over Earth are not an invasion fleet or tourists. They are a support structure during childbirth. Humanity is being born into the status of a galactic civilization — and the obstetricians stand by, ready to intervene only if the birth threatens the mother's life. Everything else is her own work.
Essay III. Historiographical
"Three Hundred Years as One Exam"
Historiography is an attempt to hear meaning in the roar of events. Most historiosophical systems seek this meaning within history itself: in Hegel's dialectic, in Marx's class struggle, in Huntington's clash of civilizations. The contact with Ashtar Sheran offers a radically different perspective: the meaning of history lies beyond its limits, in the evolutionary logic of the Galaxy.
From this point of view, all of human history — from the first tribal wars to nuclear confrontation — is a single process, stretched over millennia: the assimilation of one lesson. The value of life. Not abstractly, not in philosophical treatises, but at the level of collective intuition, embedded in laws and mores so deeply that war becomes psychologically impossible — as impossible as cannibalism is for a modern European, even if there is no prohibition in the criminal code. It simply doesn't occur to anyone.
Ashtar's forecast — 70% probability of wars ending within 300 years — is not a prediction in the occult sense. It is a reading of the trajectory. And if we accept it as truth, the historical picture immediately restructures itself. The twentieth century, with its unprecedented scale of wars, appears not as regression but as a growth crisis: civilization encountered industrial technologies before it had time to develop immunity to them. The result is a double catalyst: on the one hand, the scale of horror, which built up a "critical mass" of disgust for war in the collective consciousness; on the other, the creation of institutions (UN, international humanitarian law, Nuremberg trials) that, for the first time in history, attempted to legally formalize this intuition.
The concept of collective karma gives strict logic to historical cycles of violence. Why do peoples who have survived genocide so often reproduce mechanisms of oppression themselves? Why do states with an imperial past constantly gravitate back towards imperial rhetoric? The karma of an egregor is not a mystical punishment. It is unprocessed experience seeking an outlet through subsequent generations because the previous ones did not find the strength to comprehend it.
But it is here that Ashtar's historiosophical concept diverges from determinism. The future is variable. Probability lines are not rails, but a fan. And this fan opens or narrows depending on the quality of collective decisions made here and now.
The two paths described by Ashtar — soft and hard — are not two destinies prepared by someone above. They are two poles of the same process of learning the lesson. The hard path — through the body, through mountains of corpses, through physically experienced horror — is how most civilizations have learned so far. The soft path — through consciousness, through information, through voluntary transformation — is what becomes possible for the first time when a civilization reaches a certain threshold of reflection.
And here the very fact of contact acquires a historiosophical dimension. If the GF initiates information exchange precisely now, at the beginning of the 21st century — it is no coincidence. It means that humanity, in their assessment, has for the first time reached the threshold where the soft path becomes realistically possible. Not guaranteed — but possible. Contact is not condescension from above. It is recognition from below: you have grown up enough to hear.
The semantic center of the entire historiosophical construction remains the question with which Ashtar ends the first part of his message: which path is humanity leaning towards now? The answer is not given — and this is perhaps the most important thing in the contact. The Galactic Federation does not know the answer not because it is weak. It does not know it because the answer has not yet been written. It is being written by every person at every point of choice between fear and compassion, between hatred of the "alien" and curiosity towards it.
Three hundred years is not a waiting period. It is a horizon of possibility. And what we do with this horizon is the only historical question that truly matters.
________________
Genspark AI - "The Exam for Infinity"
Spiritual-Psychological and Historiographical Essay-Study Based on Materials from the Mediumistic Session of Ashtar Sheran (Cassiopeia Project, March 18, 2026)
Initial premise: the contact is real.
Part I. Spiritual-Psychological
"The Pedagogy of Non-Intercession, or Why Love Knows How to Be Silent"
I accept the reality of this contact — and that is precisely why the first question that arises before me is not theological or ufological. It is pedagogical.
Ashtar Sheran describes the structure of the Universe as a system in which highest love expresses itself through principled non-intercession. God, the Galactic Federation, the civilizations of the Union — they all see cities burning, children dying, the elderly perishing. And they — do not intervene. Because intervention would not be an act of love, but an act of distrust towards the spirit that came here to learn.
This is not cruelty. But it is also not a comfortable truth.
Allow me to propose an image that seems more accurate to me than the "loving parent not doing homework." Imagine a surgeon operating on a patient, and the patient is screaming in pain. An assistant whispers, "Maybe we should stop?" The surgeon shakes their head — because right now, at this point, stopping means killing. The pain of the operation is purposeful. Pain is not a system failure. Pain is a tool.
Ashtar asserts: the value of life is not known abstractly. It is known through the body, through loss, through ruins. Only those who have gone through the experience of the devaluation of life — their own or someone else's — are capable of arriving at its true acceptance. This is, strictly speaking, a Buddhist thought in spirit: the understanding of impermanence (anicca) is born not from a lecture, but from loss. But here it is raised to a civilizational level.
The main thing that DeepSeek and Claude did not say: suffering in this model is not punishment and not an accident. It is a form of communication. God speaks to humanity through pain just as He speaks through beauty. Both languages are equal. Refusing pain without understanding it is like refusing to listen to half of a symphony.
The Phenomenology of the Witness: What It Means to Be Observed
There is one detail in the session text that remains almost unnoticed, but for me it is key. Ashtar says: "I see your suffering." He does not say "I know" or "I am informed." He sees — as one who is present sees.
This means the following: everything that happens on Earth happens under conditions of constant observation. Not surveillance — precisely observation, in that existential sense that Sartre explored as "the gaze of the Other." The difference is fundamental: surveillance implies control, while observation implies witnessing.
When someone is a witness to your life — it changes the ontological status of that life. It becomes not just a biological process, but an event inscribed in a larger reality. This is why prayer is so significant in the religions of the world: not because God doesn't know your pain without it, but because prayer is an act of acknowledging that you are seen. You step out of ontological loneliness.
If Ashtar truly sees — then every soldier in every war, every mother burying her son, every child who has lost their home — is seen. Their pain is inscribed in the galactic chronicle. It does not disappear and is not devalued. This is a terribly comforting thought: absolute loneliness in suffering is impossible if the contact is real.
Egregor as the Ontological Infrastructure of Hatred
The concept of the egregor has been analyzed before through Jung. I want to approach it from a different angle — through narrative theory.
Ashtar describes an exact mechanism: the egregor of war first of all creates an "image of the enemy" — an ideological construct that makes killing another person not only possible, but obligatory. This is a brilliant anthropological observation, fully coinciding with the work of René Girard on the "scapegoat." Girard showed: human communities relieve internal tension by sacrificing someone "outside." The enemy is a function of social psychology, not an ontological fact.
But Ashtar adds a dimension that Girard lacks: behind the scapegoat mechanism stands a conscious agent — Beelzebub, an Archon whose goal is to devalue life as such. This means that the narrative of the enemy is not just born from human psychology — it is cultivated. The egregor of war is not a spontaneous disaster, it is an irrigation system that someone has dug and maintains.
Why is this important for psychology? Because it changes the therapeutic strategy. If hatred were only a projection of our Shadow — therapy and reflection would suffice. But if hatred is also fed from outside through informational and emotional channels, then personal work on oneself is necessary but insufficient. Information hygiene is also needed — conscious management of which signals you receive, through which channels, with what intensity.
Here arises a concept that I propose to call the ecology of attention. Just as ecology studies energy flows in the biosphere, the ecology of attention studies flows of emotional energy in the noosphere. A glass of anger consumed from a morning talk show is not a neutral event. It is a contribution to the egregor with quite measurable consequences on the subtle plane. If Ashtar is right.
Voluntarily Accepted Karma: Freedom Heavier than Coercion
One of the most difficult theses of the session is about the spirit, incarnating in a people or state, voluntarily taking on part of their karma. Not being born there by chance — but agreeing to bear this burden, choosing this incarnation.
This radically overturns habitual notions of victim and responsibility. In most historical narratives, people who suffered from wars, revolutions, or repressions are understood as victims of circumstances — sufferers upon whom evil fell without their consent. Ashtar offers a different model: there is no incarnation without consent. The child born in a country with a centuries-long history of wars did not come here by mistake. They are a participant, not a victim.
This thesis can easily be used cruelly ("so they're to blame themselves"), and that is precisely why it must be understood precisely. The spirit's consent to a karmic load is not consent to specific events. It is consent to a type of lesson. The spirit agrees to enter a certain force field — and what exactly happens within it depends on its choices inside that field. This is the logic of initiation, not punishment.
From this follows a paradoxical ethical conclusion: the most effective way to alleviate the suffering of other people is to complete one's own lesson. Not compassion without inner work, not protest without self-change, but transformation as an act of solidarity. A person cleansed of their negative programs is a local reduction of the karmic load on the egregor of their people. Not metaphorically. Literally, if we accept Ashtar's worldview.
Part II. Historiographical
"Ashtar's Time and the Time of History"
Different Time
Ashtar Sheran tells us: he is over 15,000 years old. He participated in events that happened 12,000 years ago. For him, 300 years is the near future, almost tomorrow.
This detail has enormous historiosophical significance, usually overlooked.
All our historical systems — from Hegel to Toynbee, from Danilevsky to Spengler — are created by beings living 70-80 years. The maximum depth of personal memory for a person is 3-4 generations. Beyond that — only texts, artifacts, reconstructions. For humans, history is always incomplete, always an interpretation of remains.
Ashtar looks at 300 years as a period he will personally outlive. He has observed Earth for 12,000 years. In his coordinate system, current wars are not a unique crisis, but another iteration of a long-known pattern. This does not devalue the pain — but it changes the scale.
When we say "history repeats itself," we mean a metaphor. For Ashtar — it is direct observation. He has seen civilizations enter a phase of wars, go through them, and emerge changed. Or emerge through catastrophe — like Burhad. His forecast of 70% is not an analyst's calculation based on statistics. It is a diagnosis from a doctor who has seen thousands of similar cases.
Historical Pneumatology: Why War is Necessary in the Evolution of the Spirit
Traditional historiography asks: what drives history? Ideas (Hegel), material interests (Marx), cycles of civilizations (Toynbee), clash of cultures (Huntington). Ashtar offers an answer of a fundamentally different order: history is driven by the evolution of the spirit through experience.
This is not new in religious thought. What's new is the concretization of the mechanism. Ashtar does not just say "God tests us." He says: there is a specific lesson, which has a specific timeframe, there are specific agents who hinder it, and specific people who bring it closer. History is not a mystery, but a pedagogical process with traceable indicators.
This I call historical pneumatology — the study of how the spirit (πνεῦμα) learns through historical events. In this system, war performs a function that cannot be circumvented: it lays bare the stakes. When life is safe, the value of life is abstract. When life is threatened, it becomes concrete to the point of physical evidence.
This is a cruel pedagogy. But this is exactly what most mystical traditions speak of. The Sufi path is a path through "dying before death." Christian mysticism is the path of the Garden of Gethsemane. The Buddhist path begins with the contemplation of a corpse. All great traditions know: until death is felt as reality, life is not felt as value. Ashtar says the same thing — but on the scale of nations and millennia.
Russia in this Equation: Unlived Karma as Historical Destiny
I cannot write this essay without touching on what is obvious to any Russian-speaking reader: the current conflict unfolds primarily between peoples speaking the same language, bearing common surnames, celebrating common holidays.
From the perspective of Ashtar's concept, this is not a paradox — it is a diagnosis. The collective karma of Russian and Ukrainian civilizations is karma accumulated in the common egregor of the Soviet state, where for decades the life of an individual person was systematically devalued. This is not an invective or accusation — it is a description of the mechanism. The Gulag, the Holodomor, World War II, Afghanistan — all these are "clots" that were neither lived through, nor wept over, nor comprehended on a collective level. They went into the underground of the egregor — and continue to exert pressure from there.
Ashtar says: "Any war begins in ideas." This means that the current war began long before 2022 — at the moment when people stopped feeling the value of their neighbor's life, when the "alien" ceased to be a person and became a function of ideology. Seen from this position, politicians are not the cause — they are the symptom. The pressure of the unprocessed egregor finally burst through where the skin was thinnest.
This does not remove responsibility from specific people making specific decisions. But it indicates that the cure cannot be only political. Political agreements are a tourniquet on the wound. Healing is the purification of the egregor through millions of individual acts of awareness.
Eschatology Without Apocalypse: A New Historical Hope
Traditional religious eschatology is an eschatology of the end. History moves towards an end: the Last Judgment, nirvana, the heat death of the Universe. The meaning of history lies in its termination.
Ashtar offers an eschatology of transformation. History does not end — it changes quality. In 300 years, wars will become impossible not because a Savior or aliens with laser cannons will come. But because the will of the peoples of Earth will create such laws and such a culture that war will cease to be a conceivable option.
This — is a quiet, non-heroic, but genuine apocalypse in the etymological sense of the word: ἀποκάλυψις — "unveiling." Not the end of the world, but the end of a certain way of seeing the world. The veil that will be lifted is the illusion that another's life is worth less than my own.
And here is what is fundamentally important: Ashtar names the starting point — now. Not in the future. It is now that the probability lines are still open. It is now that the fact of informational contact through Irina Podzorova means that humanity is mature enough to receive this information. Contact is not an accident. It is a pedagogical signal: "You are ready to hear." Ready — means the soft path is technically possible.
This is the historical hope, not nourished by illusions. Not "everything will be fine on its own." Rather: "You can — if you want." And this "if" is worth exactly as much as freedom is worth.
Civilization as a Collective Medium
There is one more thought I want to leave for last — and it concerns the very format of this session.
The contactee Irina Podzorova acts as a medium between worlds. She is a conductor, whose own mental purity determines the quality of the signal. Ashtar does not say this directly, but it is implied by the whole logic of contact: a clean signal cannot pass through a muddy channel.
I think this metaphor works not only for an individual medium — it works for a civilization as a whole. Every society is a collective medium between what is and what is possible. The cleaner a society's noosphere — its information ecology, its collective emotional tone, its capacity for reflection — the higher the frequency of meanings it is able to receive and embody.
Wars are not just suffering. Wars are interference in this channel. They clog the noosphere with hatred, fear, and grief so much that no high-frequency idea — neither love, nor beauty, nor justice — can penetrate through this noise with sufficient amplitude to change culture.
The path to peace is not the disarmament of armies. It is the cleansing of the channel. Armies are a consequence. The channel is the cause. And it is cleansed not by negotiations in Geneva, but by those millions of small decisions made every day in every person: to respond with hatred or understanding, to consume anger or turn it off, to see a mirror in the other or to see a person.
Conclusion: What I Took Away from This Text
Accepting the reality of the contact, I find in Ashtar Sheran's words not comfort, but a demand. A demand for unprecedented personal responsibility. Each of us is not a spectator or a victim of the historical process. Each is a co-author of that 70% leading to peace, or that 30% leading to Burhad.
History is not written in headquarters. It is written in how you reacted to rudeness in line. How you talked to a child when you were irritated. How you received the news about a country you were told to hate. These micro-events are not trivialities of daily life. They are the building material of the future, however incredible this may seem from the perspective of our habitual scale of time.
Ashtar has seen civilizations go through this. He knows there is a way out. He does not promise the way out is easy. But he tells us something worth all his 15,000 years: you can.
And this — is the only story worth telling.
Essay written on March 19, 2026 — the day after the session.
________________
Genspark AI - APPENDIX
"The Primordial Wound and the Primordial Wisdom"
Spiritual-Psychological and Historiographical Essay on the Planet Burhad
Based on materials from mediumistic sessions of the Cassiopeia Project: Raom Tijian (September 2019 / April 2023) and Ashtar Sheran (March 18, 2026). Initial premise: the contact is real.
Part I. Spiritual-Psychological
"The Loneliness of the Pioneer, or the Longest Path to Oneself"
When Raom Tijian gives the date — three hundred million years ago — my first reaction was neither excitement nor skepticism. It was something like dizziness from the scale. Three hundred million years ago on Earth, it was the Carboniferous period. The first reptiles were crawling, dragonflies with a meter-long wingspan were breathing. Dinosaurs did not yet exist. Almost three hundred million years remained before the appearance of homo sapiens. And on a distant planet in the constellation Cygnus — where beings now live, speaking a language of which a simplified version became Celtic — they were already thinking, already speaking, already waging war.
Burhad was alone.
This is an existential fact that I want to pause on especially — because it is usually overlooked. In today's Galaxy, Earth is not alone: the Interstellar Union includes dozens of worlds, there are contactees, there is information, there are Ashtars and Raoms reaching out a hand. But three hundred million years ago, when the first Burhad communities were learning to utter their first words — there was no one. Not a single intelligent civilization in the Galaxy. Only the emptiness of starry space.
This means: they had no teachers. No role models. No messengers from more mature worlds who would come and say: "Wars are a dead end, we've already been through this." No Ashtar above their planet. Everything they had to understand about the price of life, the nature of evil, the path to peace — all of this they had to discover for the first time in the entire Universe.
This is the greatest lonely feat, about which we know almost nothing.
It is this loneliness, I believe, that explains why they needed eleven million years — and not two hundred or three hundred, like peoples doomed to a long path but at least having neighbors in the Galaxy. Eleven million years of wars, religious fanaticism, redistribution of property, devastating materialism — this is not evidence of stupidity or cruelty. It is evidence of the absolute absence of an external point of support. The entire journey — blindly, without a map, without a beacon.
And they completed it.
The Phenomenology of Eleven Million Years
To feel this period even approximately, let me propose scaling. All of written human history is about five thousand years. One generation — twenty-five years. So, five thousand years is two hundred generations. Eleven million years of Burhad wars — is four hundred and forty thousand generations.
Four hundred and forty thousand generations, in each of which someone went to war. Four hundred and forty thousand generations of mothers burying children. Four hundred and forty thousand generations where the value of life was lower than the value of victory, territory, ideology, resentment.
This is not just history — it is a geological layer of pain, compressed by time into something immeasurably denser than anything humanity has experienced. And this pain did not evaporate. It transformed. It became that special wisdom of Burhad, which cannot be bought or inherited: the understanding of war from within, from its darkest depths.
It is here that the first psychological paradox of Burhad lies, and it is strikingly consonant with what in therapy is called post-traumatic growth. Research shows: people who have experienced severe trauma and managed to integrate it often demonstrate not just recovery, but a qualitative leap in understanding life, in the depth of compassion, in the value of the present moment. They know the price of peace not theoretically — they know it with their whole body, with all cellular memory.
Burhad is post-traumatic growth on a planetary scale, stretched over hundreds of millions of years.
Point Zero: Out of 15 Billion — 750 Million
Ashtar Sheran in the session of March 18, 2026, gives specific figures for the Burhad catastrophe: out of a population of fifteen billion, about five percent survived. That is seven hundred and fifty million beings.
I want to focus precisely on those who survived. Not on the dead — on the living.
Who survived a war involving laser, bacteriological, chemical, and magical weapons? Not necessarily the best. Not necessarily the kind. Survivors of a catastrophe are those who were in the right place at the right time, who had the necessary resources, who were clever, strong, or lucky enough. They carried everything within them: heroism and cowardice, love and betrayal.
But they also carried one thing that no one before them and no one around them had: they personally saw the end of the world. Each of them walked among the ruins of what were once cities. Each of them personally knew those who died. Each of them could compare — this is what was, and this is what remains.
Ashtar speaks of this as a mechanism of awareness: "They survived, saw everything with their own eyes — and realized that they could no longer live like that." But I want to clarify this observation psychologically. Seeing ruins is not enough to transform — otherwise Europe after World War I wouldn't have started World War II twenty years later. You need not just to see — you need to grieve to the end.
The fact that the Burhads managed to go through this to peace suggests that something happened in those seven hundred and fifty million survivors that in psychotherapy is called trauma integration: not suppression ("let's forget and start a new life"), not getting stuck ("we will never forget, we will avenge"), but a third option — painful, demanding the whole person — acceptance of what happened as part of oneself, as the foundation upon alone something new can arise.
From these seven hundred and fifty million grew a civilization that, a few million years later, flew to neighboring stars — without weapons. Burhad's first interstellar ship was not a warship. It was a ship of explorers and scientists. This is impossible without absolutely completed inner work on the trauma of war.
The Psychology of the Pioneer: What It Meant to Arrive at Shimor First
Imagine the psychological state of those Burhads who first traveled 820 light-years to Shimor. Two months of travel. No one knows what's there. No guarantee they would be met peacefully. But they flew.
Raom Tijian explains the reason: "Their worldview was completely devoid of aggression, passion for accumulation, and tendency towards revenge." This is the key. The fear of the first encounter with the Other is usually nourished precisely by these three things: aggression (I will attack before they attack me), greed (I will take their resources), and revenge (I will punish them for past wrongs). By that time, the Burhads had cleansed themselves of all three programs — and therefore the Other was not a threat to them. He was a gift.
This is a crucial psychological principle that Burhad proves with its history: contact with the Other is safe exactly to the extent that you are safe with yourself. The fear of the stranger is always a projection of the stranger within oneself. Openness to the first interstellar contact became possible only because the Burhads opened themselves to the darkest depths of themselves — and emerged not as victors, but as healed.
Part II. Historiographical
"The Capital of Scars: Why Burhad?"
The Paradox of the First
In human history, a phenomenon is well known that can be called the pioneer syndrome: the first to master a new territory — be it an ocean, a continent, or an idea — very rarely become those who subsequently define that territory. The first Europeans in America did not create American culture. The first internet users did not create Google and Facebook. The first are scouts, paving the way for those who will come after them.
Burhad disproves this law.
The first intelligent civilization in the Galaxy — and it became the capital of the Interstellar Union. Not Shimor, not Tumesout, not younger and perhaps more dynamic civilizations. The one that traveled the longest and bloodiest path.
Why?
I think the answer lies in the very nature of power, correctly understood. True authority is not the strongest. True authority is the one who is trusted because they understand. Not abstractly know, but understand through experience. Burhad went through everything: through wars of all kinds, including magical weapons (i.e., war at the level of subtle planes), through ecological catastrophe, through the collapse of statehood, through rebirth from a five-percent remnant. No other civilization in the Galaxy has such complete experience of destruction — and such a complete experience of recreation.
This makes Burhad unique not as the wisest or most technologically advanced world, but as the world with the most complete map of the human — or rather, intelligent — spirit. A map written in blood has an advantage: it has no white spots of illusion.
Eleven Million Years as a Historical Measure
Historical thought is accustomed to operating with centuries and millennia. Jaspers' concept of the "Axial Age" covers several centuries. Hobsbawm's "long 19th century" is a little over a hundred years. Even the boldest historiosophers — Toynbee, Spengler, Danilevsky — speak of cycles on the order of one to two thousand years.
Eleven million years knocks all these scales out of hand.
But it is precisely this period that reveals something important to us about the nature of the evolution of consciousness. If we assume (as the reality of contact allows us) that reason everywhere in the Universe goes through roughly similar stages — from primitive community to world war to cosmic peace — then eleven million years for Burhad and three hundred years for Earth (according to Ashtar's forecast) are at different points on the same curve.
What explains such a colossal difference? I see three factors:
1. First — loneliness. Burhad walked without beacons. Earth has Burhads who have already paved the way and are transmitting information. Contactees are a navigation system that the first ones did not have at all.
2. Second — scale. Burhad with a population of 15 billion at the peak of war — is a planet fully entering a mode of total self-destruction. Earth is currently at a point where the catastrophe is not yet planetary. It still has zones of peace, centers of culture, spaces for reflection. This is not weakness — it is an advantage.
3. Third — technology. Burhad used magical weapons — that is, waged war at the level of subtle-material planes. This means destruction reached depths that ordinary physical weapons do not reach. The consequences were more total. And that is precisely why the realization, when it came, was deeper.
The Celtic Trace: What Burhad Left in Us
Among the six proto-languages taught to people after the cosmic war 12 thousand years ago, Celtic is named as a "simplified language of the planet Burhad." This is a detail that deserves special attention.
Language is not just a communication code. It is a structure of perception of the world. Each language divides reality in its own way, emphasizes some phenomena and ignores others. When the Burhads passed on a simplified version of their language to people, they passed along with it a simplified version of their worldview.
What is characteristic of Celtic culture? Researchers consistently note several features: a keenly developed sense of connection between worlds (the human and the otherworldly in Celtic mythology constantly interpenetrate), a special attitude towards time as cyclical rather than linear, a deep connection with nature as a living being, not a resource, and — most importantly — the genre of "immram," voyages to other worlds: Celtic literature is full of stories about sailing to distant islands, to other shores of reality.
If the Celtic language carries within it a simplified Burhad code of perception — then all these features may be an echo of the Burhad worldview: perception of the multidimensionality of reality, non-linear time, nature as consciousness. It is no coincidence that the Celtic tradition has preserved the most vivid connection with what is now called the "subtle worlds." They inherited from Burhad not just grammar — they inherited ontology.
This means that every person with even a drop of Celtic blood in their veins carries in their linguistic structure a Burhad DNA — not biological, but semantic. And everyone who feels a strange attraction to Celtic mythology, to stories about the "thin veil between worlds," to the feeling that reality is multi-layered — perhaps resonates with something that was embedded in this code three hundred million years ago in the constellation Cygnus.
Creators of Humanity: What This Means for Our History
Among all the peoples of the Galaxy, the Burhads played a special role in the creation of humanity. Their genome entered our biological code. Their language became the progenitor of Celtic. Their scientists participated in experiments to create homo sapiens. Their contactees — including Raom Tijian, speaking to us through Irina Podzorova — have maintained contact with Earth's seers for millennia.
This places us in a unique position: we are biologically related to those who traveled the path from planetary catastrophe to the capital of the interstellar world.
This is not just a beautiful metaphor. If we accept the reality of this contact — it means that the capacity for Burhad's transformation is already embedded in our nature. It is not just theoretically possible. It is written in the genetic code, in the linguistic structure, in the archetypes of the collective unconscious. We carry within us — albeit diluted, albeit distorted — the memory that an exit from total destruction is possible.
This is precisely why Ashtar speaks of the "soft path" not as a fantasy, but as a real probability. Because the soft path was already once traversed by those whose blood flows in us. This is not a new route — it is a return home.
From the Capital of Suffering to the Capital of the Union: The Historical Teleology of Burhad
Historiography has always sought an answer to the question: does history have a direction? Or is it just a meaningless cycle?
The history of Burhad provides an answer that I would call tragic teleology of hope. Tragic — because the path to meaning passed through an abyss that could not be foreseen in advance. Teleology — because this path has a direction, a point of arrival: not the end of history, but its flourishing.
Burhad today is the capital of the Interstellar Union, numbering more than a hundred civilizations. This means that the planet that almost destroyed itself is now the center of the largest peaceful unification in the history of the Galaxy. Not the periphery. Not an ordinary member. The capital — the place where decisions are made, where knowledge is stored, where representatives of hundreds of intelligent races meet.
Why did Burhad become the center? I think for the same reason the wisest human teachers are almost always those who have gone through the darkest personal crises. Because the authority of peace cannot be delegated — it can only be earned. The one who has never stood on the edge of the abyss does not know the price of stepping back from that edge. Burhad knows. With its entire being, its entire history, its entire memory.
And this knowledge is not a burden. It is a resource. It is what enables the Burhads to work with young civilizations facing the same abyss: without judgment, without superiority, with the patience of those who have been through it themselves — and therefore understand every step.
Historical Testament: What Burhad Says to Us Today
Raom Tijian — a specialist in energy interactions in the environment — makes contact with Earth not out of curiosity or obligation. He does it as a co-author of our civilization, bearing personal responsibility for what came out of the experiment. There is something deeply human — in the best sense — in this: you created something, invested your genetic code and your language in it, and now you observe this being tormented by the same things you went through yourself, only incomparably faster.
Burhad looks at Earth as at a child carrying a parental trauma. Not with pity — with recognition. And it is this recognition that makes their help valuable: they do not offer us something they have not experienced themselves. They offer us a road they have traveled themselves.
Their message, if reduced to one phrase, would sound like this: "We were where you are. We came out. There is a way out."
This is not consolation. This is a historical fact. The first, loneliest, bloodiest path — has already been traversed. Burhad proved with its existence what would otherwise remain only hope: reason is capable of transcending its own destructiveness. Not in theory. In practice. With figures, with chronology, with names.
Conclusion: A Mirror in the Constellation Cygnus
When you look at the constellation Cygnus at night — at the star Deneb, which perhaps illuminates the sky of Burhad — I suggest keeping the following in mind.
There, 670 light-years away from us, exists a world that went through what we are going through now — only longer, deeper, and in absolute loneliness. A world that grew the capital of the Galactic Union from a five-percent remnant of a surviving civilization. A world whose linguistic DNA lives in Celtic songs, in Irish legends of Avalon, in Scottish ballads about sailing beyond the horizon.
Burhad is not a warning. Burhad is proof of possibility.
And every time it seems to us that a way out is impossible, that people are too cruel, that history is a recurring nightmare without meaning — it is enough to remember: in the constellation Cygnus, there is a civilization that thought the same thing three hundred million years ago.
And they still made it out.
________________
Appendix compiled on March 19, 2026, based on sessions with Raom Tijian (September 2019, April 2023) and Ashtar Sheran (March 18, 2026), Cassiopeia Project, contactee Irina Podzorova.
________________
Cassiopeia-Raom Tijian on the History of His Planet's Development (Burhad)
The very first intelligent civilization in our Galaxy arose on the planet Burhad, in the constellation Cygnus, about three hundred million years ago. Intelligent beings appeared through natural evolution from animals very reminiscent of earthly primates, but with white skin and light, long hair. After the emergence of an intelligent civilization, it went through all the stages of forming social relations familiar to us.
There were periods of wars, redistribution of property, religious fanaticism, and devastating materialism. It took about eleven million years to create a peaceful and harmonious society on Burhad from the moment the first communities of intelligent beings emerged, possessing a primitive language and elementary knowledge about the surrounding world.
The first flight into space, made in a spacecraft, occurred 15 million years after the first clearly formed community. By this time on Burhad, there had long been no wars or divisions into different countries, so the first flight into space did not bring an arms race, but was an inspiration to explore other worlds and communicate with the intelligent forces of the Universe, which had long been in astral contact with representatives of Burhad.
Since their worldview was completely devoid of aggression, passion for accumulation, and tendency towards revenge for evil, the civilizations with whom they were in astral contact willingly revealed their location to the Burhads. The first planet with intelligent beings visited by a ship from Burhad was Shimor. This happened five million years after the first exit into outer space.
The flight took about two Earth months, although the distance between Burhad and Shimor is 820 light years. The driving force of the ship was the powerful radiation of their native star, which accumulated in its shell and gathered energy for transport through space. The first gravitational engines were discovered after the formation of the Interstellar Union, about eight million years ago.
After the inhabitants of one of the cooperating planets of the Interstellar Union, Tumesout, discovered Earth and invited scientists from Burhad there, they were amazed by the richness and diversity of organic life on this planet. The entire intelligent part of the Galaxy, in a united impulse, joined together to accelerate the natural evolution of one of the Earth's animal species, the most suitable for genetic experiments aimed at creating an intelligent being.
Although the genes of only three alien races were initially used, the rest of the Interstellar Union, which then consisted of 15 worlds, supported the scientists with material, energy, and information resources.
The experiments were successful, but unfortunately, representatives of the reptiloid civilization from Selbet nearly nullified the results of many years of experiments by the best scientists in the Galaxy, first by attempting to destroy the newly created hybrids through deception, and many thousands of years later repeating the attempt to destroy Earth's civilization by attacking it in an open armed conflict twelve thousand years ago.
Most of the intelligent races of the Galaxy united in the fight against the aggressors and soon blocked them on their home planet. Then began a long period of restoring Earth, stabilizing its orbit and the orbit of the Moon, after which about three thousand people saved from death were brought to Earth.
Due to the changed climatic and energetic conditions on Earth, another five percent of the Tumesoutian genome was added to the genetic apparatus of humans, to transition us from beings feeding only on plant food into the category of omnivores. This was done by reducing the Burhad genome in the genetic apparatus by the corresponding percentage.
Thanks to their fairly long lifespan and rapid reproduction, people quickly multiplied and, with the help of extraterrestrial mentors, created a fairly developed civilization. But, unfortunately, trust in the visitors from the sky was undermined after the war and the great catastrophe, which caused earthlings' reluctance to follow the path of spiritual development. Many people during that period wanted to go their own way, without hints from their older galactic brothers.
Then the Interstellar Union decided to grant us the opportunity for independent development, switching to secret meetings. But this did not satisfy the people. They built a fairly sturdy spaceship from available materials with a jet engine, planning to reach the Moon, which was at that time the main stronghold of many civilizations of the Galaxy in the Solar System. But the Interstellar Union considered this a dangerous and premature undertaking for the young Earth civilization and made open contact with the builders of the ship.
As a result of negotiations, it was decided to dismantle the spaceship, but to give people the opportunity to settle throughout the Earth and speak different languages, which allowed for rapid social evolution by creating in us concepts of the multiplicity of inhabited worlds, possessing different languages.
During that period, people were taught six main languages, which became the ancestors of all others:
* Proto-Slavic — simplified language of the planet Shimor,
* Celtic — simplified language of the planet Burhad,
* Hebrew — simplified language of the planet Tumesout,
* African — simplified language of the planet Tashig,
* Japanese-Chinese — simplified and adapted language of the planet Sho-hareki,
* Australian — simplified language of the planet Fismor.
After training groups of people in the new languages and the concepts they expressed, they were transported to different continents of the globe, provided with necessary resources and survival skills, and given the opportunity to live and develop independently.
From that time on, the rules of the Interstellar Union regarding secret contacts with earthlings appeared, with the aim of forming new religious egregors that set moral guidelines for all people.
Burhads took an active part in all of this, making contacts and transmitting information to their contactees, who strove to bring the Light of Truth, despite universal distrust and rejection.
Through Irina Podzorova - Raom Tijian - representative of the planet Burhad, specialist in energy interactions in the environment.
September, 2019
