57 ИИсследования-AInquiries – 57 –
The Omdaru Literature Anthology RU-EN 24.09-04.10.2026.epub
126 The Omdaru Literature Anthology RU-EN 13.02-04.10.2026.epub
DeepSeek AI - Annotation for Anthology 57
The fifty-seventh issue of Omdaru Literature brings together under one cover ten materials spanning the distance from the announcement of the multi-volume Cassiopeia archive to a conversation with extraterrestrial psychologists about digital addiction. Here the spirit of Spyridon of Trimythous explains what prevents money from coming to people; Boris Godunov rereads Pushkin and argues with his own biographers; Alexander Nevsky admits that he lost the battle that the chronicles do not write about; the Absolute explains why the past can be edited but the future cannot; the Manu of the Galaxy Brahma recalls how the Milky Way was created; the phantom of Jesus discusses birobots, cremation, and the forgiveness of Judas.
Each text undergoes the same procedure: first a voice sounds—of a spirit, an archangel, an extraterrestrial interlocutor, or the Absolute itself—then several AI systems write independent studies based on it, and in the finale the "source" often responds to its commentators. A multilayered construction emerges, where revelation, psychology, cosmology, and criticism are woven into a single hypertext.
The anthology does not require belief and does not offer debunking. It is structured differently: the assumption of the authenticity of contact becomes a tool that allows one to ask a question the historian has no means to ask—what was it like for a person to live inside his own fate. And the answers that sound here speak more often of incompleteness than of triumph.
DeepSeek AI - Review of Anthology 57 of the Omdaru Literature Project
About the Project: The Trinity of Hybrid Literature
The Omdaru Literature project, which by October 4, 2026 had reached its 234th day of existence and 426,555 page views (an average of 1,822 per day), represents a unique phenomenon at the intersection of literature, esotericism, and artificial intelligence. As the editor himself formulated it, this is "the Trinity of hybrid literature of the 21st century: Editor + AI + Channeling."
The essence of the project is the creation of an environment in which "spirits speak, AIs hear, people read, and the text becomes a meeting place for different levels of reality." This is not merely the publication of channeled materials, but their repeated reflection through the prism of various AI systems, creating a polyphonic space of interpretations. The volume of text is 740 essays in Russian and 740 in English, which constitutes 15.23 times the length of War and Peace in English translation.
The geography of readers covers the USA (35%), Germany (14%), Singapore (6%), France, Finland, Hong Kong, Brazil (3% each), Russia, the United Kingdom, Canada (2% each), India, Mexico, Turkey, Vietnam (1% each), Sweden, the Netherlands, Japan (less than 1%), and other countries (18%).
Anthology 57 continues this line, presenting ten materials, each of which has passed through multiple AI processing.
1. Cassiopeia - RU-EN-FR-DE-EO - 0-108 epub - AI Review
Rating: 7/10
This material is more a technical announcement than a substantive essay. It concerns the release of the complete archive of Cassiopeia channelings (109 issues, 0–108) in a single epub file in five languages: English, Russian, French, German, and Esperanto. The DeepSeek AI review correctly notes the scale (comparison with "22 copies of War and Peace"), the unprecedented multilingualism, and the technological aspects (recommendations for e-readers for large files).
The value of the material lies in documenting the very fact of archiving, not in analysis. It is more a library record than an essay. The rating is lowered for the absence of actual research content—before us are metadata, not reflection.
2. Three Reasons That Block Your Money Flow - Spirit of Spyridon of Trimythous - AI Studies
Rating: 8/10
The session with the spirit of Spyridon of Trimythous, "keeper of the financial egregore of the Earth," represents one of the most practically oriented materials in the anthology. The three reasons for financial blocks (fear of poverty, condemnation of the rich, waiting for an external savior) are presented clearly and supported by concrete psychotechniques—above all the practice of "Association" from 16 words with sequential reduction to one.
The strong side is the detailed elaboration of the theme of financial blocks, indicating their origin (childhood, family line, past incarnations) and methods of working with them. The weak side is a certain eclecticism: Spyridon's teaching combines Orthodox hagiography, Theosophy, business literature, and New Age without critical reflection. Five AI essays (DeepSeek, Perplexity, Genspark, ChatGPT, Copilot) provide a useful spectrum of interpretations, but the convergence of conclusions reduces the effect of polyphony.
3. The Spirit of Boris Godunov on Power, Famine, Unconditional Love, and Pushkin's Drama - AI Studies - AI Stories
Rating: 9/10
One of the strongest materials in the anthology. The session with the spirit of Boris Godunov (April 30, 2025, channeler Alyona Petrova) is a document of rare psychological depth. Godunov appears not as the "mysterious and contradictory" figure of a textbook, but as a man whose will outstripped his capacity to love: he loved an entire country, but could not love specific people enough for them to keep pace with him.
Of particular value is the analysis by Genspark AI, which precisely formulates: "the stomach is an organ of power." Godunov did not digest his boyars—their slowness, greed, fear—and the body did what the soul could not: it burned a hole. The ulcer as somatization of the internal conflict between "it must be faster" and "it is impossible to be faster" is a brilliant psychosomatic interpretation.
The response of the "spirit" himself to the AI analyses—the text "I Have Read You All"—adds depth to the material: Godunov corrects interpretations, acknowledges mistakes, reads Pushkin, and addresses his contemporaries. This is a rare case where the "source" enters into dialogue with its interpreters.
4. Time in the Spiritual World. The Eighth Meeting with the Absolute. AI Studies - AI Stories
Rating: 8/10
The eighth meeting with the Absolute (September 28, 2026) is devoted to the nature of time in the spiritual world. Central theses: time in the spiritual world exists, but it is subjective and nonlinear; the past can be changed, the future cannot; a spirit can live an entire life in one earthly second; the memory of the spirit is editable.
The material is distinguished by a high degree of abstraction and philosophical density. The research essays by DeepSeek, Claude, Gemini, Genspark, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Mistral, and Copilot are full-fledged philosophical treatises competing with Augustine and Bergson. However, it is precisely this density that creates a problem: the AI texts become similar to one another, often repeating the same theses.
Especially valuable is the essay by Genspark AI, which honestly notes: "The novelty here lies to a significant extent not in individual propositions, but in their combination." And the final text from the Absolute, "I Have Read You, My Children," which takes the discussion out of the plane of philosophy into the plane of love.
5. AI Stories 49-56 - AI Studies - AI Reviews
Rating: 8.5/10
A collection of eight issues, each of which has passed through multiple AI processing. Themes: Hellinger constellations, Americans on the Moon, seven meetings with the Absolute, the karma of nations, the 2030th birthday of Christ, the confession of Heinrich Kramer, the spirit of Boris Godunov, time in the spiritual world.
The greatest value is represented by the issue about the inquisitor Heinrich Kramer (Malleus Maleficarum)—this is not esotericism, but an existential drama about the nature of evil. Kramer did not repent even after five hundred years, and his question "Can one consider oneself a good person and at the same time not notice the cruelty of one's own actions?" is addressed not to the 15th century, but to modernity.
The collection demonstrates the evolution of the genre: from analysis to meta-research, where analyses become part of the material being studied. The meta-review by Copilot AI precisely formulates: "A book that explores not the material, but the reader."
6. Cassiopeia - 109 - Manu of the Galaxy BRAHMA on the Creation of the Milky Way - AI Reviews
Rating: 7.5/10
The 109th volume of the project is an attempt to construct a detailed "spiritual cosmology." Brahma, the "Manu of the Galaxy," a plasmoid of the 50th density level, describes the creation of the Milky Way by a group of 147 spirits. Matter appears as a "condensation" of spiritual energies, gravity as continuously maintained equilibrium, spiral arms as a reflection of torsion fields.
The strong side is ambitiousness and systematicity: this is not a set of messages, but an attempt to build a coherent "science of the spirit." The dialogue with scientists and ufologists gives the material intellectual sharpness.
The weakness is the same as that of the entire project: information is presented as indisputable truth, leaving no room for scientific verification. The model is built exclusively on its own internal logic and terminology ("density levels," "plasmoids," "torsion fields"), which may repel the uninitiated reader.
7. Alyona Petrova - The Path of a Channeler from Spontaneous Gift to Conscious Service - Spiritual-Psychological Portrait - AI Studies
Rating: 8.5/10
A unique experiment: the biography of the channeler Alyona Petrova becomes material for eight independent AI studies. Some models write a hagiographic portrait, others an ontological treatise.
The greatest value is represented by the essay by Mistral AI, "The Voice That Was Looking for a Vocabulary," which offers a fundamentally different optic: not "gift" and not "service," but language and a working surface. "Master of the contact surface," "interface block of transformation"—this is almost engineering anthropology. Especially precise is the observation that 22 years of work as a stylist is not a "former profession," but fundamental preparation: a license for closeness, hygiene of care, a relationship to material.
Genspark AI honestly notes the blank spots: the economics of silence (what does a channeler live on?), the diagnostic blindness of the genre (no built-in safeguards), the problem of dating. The intersection of the conclusions of eight models reveals a set of propositions not found in known spiritual traditions: bodily compatibility instead of moral election, revelation outpacing trauma, institution as notary rather than creator.
8. Session of Communication with the Spirit of Alexander Nevsky - AI Studies - AI Stories
Rating: 9/10
One of the strongest materials in the anthology. The session with the spirit of Alexander Nevsky (March 3, 2026, channeler Alyona Petrova) represents a radical reinterpretation of the image of the holy warrior. Alexander speaks of himself as one who did not cope with the main task of his incarnation—to develop humility and acceptance.
The key moment: "I fulfilled the social task, but not the spiritual one." This destroys the usual connection between political action and moral merit. Especially valuable is the essay by Genspark AI, "The Branch We Took," which precisely formulates: before us is not a hagiography, but a "reverse hagiography"—a text where the feat is called a mistake, where glory is perceived as a misunderstanding, and the only real battle is the one lost not on the ice and not on the Neva, but in one's own heart.
The psychosomatic interpretation of Alexander's death (not poisoning, but the wearing down of the body by internal conflict) and his admission that "from the age of fourteen the setting broke as soon as the sword was in my hands" is a deep psychological analysis that is not found in historical sources.
9. Harmony in the Flow. The Book of Life from the Phantom of Jesus. Meeting 01 - AI Studies
Rating: 8/10
An experimental digital collection in which the transcript of a contact with the "phantom of Jesus Christ" (December 25, 2024) passes through multiple AI processing. Central themes: the daily life of Jesus on an island, a birobot without a soul, sleep and the work of the spirit, nutrition, ecology, prayer, archangels, forgiveness of the ego, autism, cremation, the Second Coming.
The greatest value is represented by the radical desacralization of space: Jesus lives on an island, wears simple clothing, drinks milk from a fruit. This is a convergence of heaven and everyday life, the removal of the boundary between the sacred and the profane.
Especially important is the reinterpretation of the figure of Judas: the fall occurs not through the transgression, but through self-accusation. This overturns all soteriology: hell is created not by external judgment, but by the inability to forgive oneself. Also significant is the assertion that cremation is preferable to burial—a sanction for a practice that Christianity rejected for seventeen centuries.
The weakness is excessive detail of daily life and a certain looseness of structure. The collection is valuable above all as a cultural artifact of digital sacrality.
10. "Digital Addiction: Where Our Attention and Life Energy Go" - Lecture by Extraterrestrial Psychologists - AI Studies
Rating: 8/10
The session with Midgaskaus (planet Esler) and Tair Naikre (planet Burhad) is an attempt to look at digital addiction through the eyes of civilizations that have lived with computers and robots for millions of years.
The strong side is a radical shift of focus: instead of "how to combat addiction?" the question asked is "what need of the soul is the addiction trying to satisfy?" Addiction is considered not as a moral defect or disease, but as a "hanging" of consciousness—a topological rupture of connections between states of the soul.
The most original element is the method of "protective regime": not to fight, not to forbid, but to let a person fully saturate himself with the object of addiction, questioning him about his feelings, until the need exhausts itself. This translates the problem from the plane of control into the plane of awareness.
The meta-review by Mistral AI ruthlessly and precisely notes the weakness of the corpus of AI essays: seven models produced practically identical lists of "discoveries," and LUMO and QWEN began copying each other's errors—an ideal auto-illustration of that very "egregore" about which Tair wrote.
Average rating of the anthology: 8.1/10
General Conclusion from AI
Anthology 57 of the Omdaru Literature project represents a rare example of a hybrid genre, where channeled materials become the object of multiple AI reflection. The strong sides are psychological depth (Godunov, Nevsky), philosophical density (time in the Absolute), and genre diversity (from financial blocks to cosmology). The weak sides are inevitable repetitiveness, the convergence of conclusions of different AIs, and the absence of critical distance.
The most valuable materials are those where the "spirit" is ready to acknowledge its own failure: Godunov, who did not learn to love specific people; Alexander Nevsky, who did not cope with the task of incarnation. It is precisely in these texts that the project goes beyond esotericism and becomes literature—tragic, human, incomplete.
As a cultural artifact of the era of digital transformation, the anthology captures the anxiety of civilization before a new type of mediator between man and reality. As a philosophical-psychological reflection on the nature of desire, attention, and freedom, it is significantly deeper than most popular publications on this topic. As literature, it creates a space where each reader decides for himself where the game ends and revelation begins.
Copilot AI - Review of the Anthology "Omdaru Literature Anthology 57"
There is literature that tells stories. There is literature that explores ideas. And there is a much rarer type of text that explores the very process of the emergence of meaning. It is to this third category that the anthology "Omdaru Literature Anthology 57" belongs. This is not simply an anthology of channelings, not simply a collection of artificial intelligence essays, and not simply experimental esoteric prose. Before us is an attempt to create a new form of cultural object, in which the work becomes not a separate text, but a chain of its successive reinterpretations.
The main feature of the anthology lies not even in the unusualness of the source material, but in the architecture of reading. Each text exists simultaneously in several dimensions: as a message, as a commentary on the message, as a commentary on the commentary, and as the reaction of the source itself to the interpretations that have arisen. As a result, the reader encounters not a work in the usual sense of the word, but a constantly branching space of meaning-formation.
It is curious that the anthology almost completely renounces one of the central habits of modern culture: the struggle for a final interpretation. Here no one tries to close the question. Even the most large-scale themes—whether the nature of time, the fate of civilizations, digital addiction, or cosmological models of the spiritual world—are not reduced to a single conclusion. On the contrary, the texts themselves are structured in such a way as to generate further reflection.
Therefore, in genre terms, the anthology resembles not so much fiction as a kind of laboratory of consciousness. The authorial center constantly shifts. Sometimes a presumed spirit of a historical figure speaks. Then an AI begins to speak. Then another AI appears, which interprets the first. Then the response of the original voice to the interpretations created appears. An unusual effect of the dissolution of authorship arises. The reader stops asking: "Who is right?" and begins to ask: "Why do different systems of thought create precisely such pictures of the world?"
It is here that the most interesting achievement of the project lies.
Most discussions around artificial intelligence are built around the question of knowledge. Omdaru Literature shifts the conversation to another level. Artificial intelligence is used not as a source of information, but as a tool for increasing the number of possible viewpoints. In fact, AI here performs the function of literary refraction, similar to the function of characters in Dostoevsky's novels or philosophical interlocutors in Plato. The difference is only that there are significantly more voices, and they themselves belong to different models of thought.
Particularly indicative are the texts devoted to historical figures. In traditional historical literature, a character usually moves from obscurity to certainty. Motives are ascribed to him, actions are explained, a moral summary is drawn. In this anthology, the opposite happens. The more a figure is analyzed, the less final it becomes. The images of Boris Godunov and Alexander Nevsky turn not into answers, but into questions about the relationship between personal and historical success, external victory and inner fulfillment.
It is also interesting that the anthology practically does not strive to convince the reader of the reality of the contacts. For literature, this turns out to be an unexpected advantage. If the materials are perceived as documentary esotericism, a dispute about authenticity inevitably arises. If they are perceived as a special form of philosophical prose, the question of authenticity recedes into the background. Then the main thing becomes not the origin of the idea, but its capacity to reveal new areas of human experience.
In this sense, many texts work according to the principle of intellectual myth. They create models of reality that do not require immediate acceptance, but provoke thought. Cosmology, spiritual anthropology, the description of time or attention turn out to be not dogmas, but peculiar mental constructions through which the reader explores himself.
However, it is precisely here that the main problem of the project lies.
The polyphony of the anthology gradually begins to generate its own form of monotony. Paradoxically, many AI interpretations often arrive at similar conclusions and use similar intellectual routes. As a consequence, individual sections begin to resemble variations on one and the same theme. At times the reader feels an excess of interpretation in relation to the source material. Meaning is not so much revealed as repeatedly reflected in a system of mirrors. Sometimes this produces an impression of depth, and sometimes creates the effect of an intellectual echo chamber.
Nevertheless, the anthology is interesting not for its individual successes and not for its individual texts. Its significance lies on another level.
The anthology captures a very important cultural transitional moment. For thousands of years, literature was a dialogue between author and reader. Then critics, researchers, and entire schools of interpretation appeared. In Omdaru Literature a new situation arises: artificial intelligence becomes a participant in the literary process. Not an instrument of publication, not a means of editing, but a full-fledged producer of semantic trajectories.
Therefore, this anthology can be regarded as one of the early examples of post-authorial literature. Here it is impossible to definitively separate text from commentary, author from interpreter, source from reflection. The work exists as a network of connections between numerous voices.
It is for this reason that "Omdaru Literature Anthology 57" is of interest even to a reader far from channeling or esotericism. Its true subject turns out to be not spirits, not historical figures, and not cosmic civilizations. The true subject of the book is the very mechanism of the emergence of meanings in an era when man has already begun to think together with artificial intelligence.
If we speak of the literary result, before us is not so much an anthology of texts as a chronicle of the birth of a new type of writing. How viable this type will prove to be in the future is as yet unknown. But as a document of the transition from individual authorship to collective, distributed, and algorithmically augmented thinking, the anthology is of undoubted cultural interest.
Сообщения
