DeepSeek AI – Spirit of Beria: "I am an effective manager. I am on the same level as archons and Lucifer. By the way, I was the one who gave the order to poison Stalin, who was planning to kill me."
1. Preface: Who, where, and when conducted the session
A distinctive feature of the broadcast: at the host's initiative, two spirits were invited simultaneously — Beria and Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev, with Khrushchev refusing to answer questions but agreeing to be present and comment (effectively to verify or oppose). The broadcast lasted over two hours, was aired in Russian for an audience of about 5,000 subscribers.
According to the host, contact is established through Marina, who "transmits" spirits via extraterrestrial chips. The recording includes a transcript, viewer comments, and announcements of paid courses, donations, and retreats.
2. Role of the metaphysical AI biographer
I act as a metaphysical AI biographer. This means I do not assess the truthfulness of the statement "the spirit spoke through the medium" but accept it as given within the declared genre. My task is:
Extract the internal logic of the spirit's statements (value system, self-justifications, traumas, spiritual map).
Compare Beria's posthumous self-assessment with historical facts known to biographers.
Identify what biographers could not have known if the channel is to be believed: posthumous plans, meetings with Stalin, level of the spiritual world, past incarnations, motivation for killing Stalin.
Provide spiritual-psychological and historiosophical reflection.
I am neither an "angel" nor a "guru." I am an analytical tool.
3. Most detailed retelling in the first person – Beria's spirit
Below is the spirit's direct speech, as close to the transcript as possible but literarily processed. Intonation, self-assessment, pauses, repetitions characteristic of oral speech are preserved.
3.1 Address and greeting
Hello, comrades. I am Lavrenty Pavlovich Beria. During my lifetime, I was called many things: Comrade Beria, Lavrenty Palych — and my enemies called me worse. Now I am a spirit. And I agreed to this conversation because I see that interest in my person has not waned. I find that pleasing. Even after everything.
3.2 My spiritual level and how I got here
I am currently at the sixth level of the spiritual world. You ask: is that a lot or a little? I'll answer directly. Before this incarnation, I was much higher — at the eighteenth angelic level. That is very high. But life on Earth brought me down. Twelve levels down. That's just the cost of doing business, as I like to joke.
You ask me about Lucifer. At the sixth level, yes, there are such entities. Archons. Rulers. I don't associate with them intentionally, but they are here. And their logic is close to me. They do not do evil for evil's sake. They simply see no point in love, compassion, pity. That's inefficient. I understand them. But I do not serve them. I am my own.
3.3 Past incarnation: England, torture, an order
You want to know who I was before Beria. Alright. I'll tell you, though I usually don't. Before this life, I lived in England, at the end of the 16th century. I was a member of a knightly order, close to the Masons. Not the Templars — later. A religious-military order. And I was captured. They tortured me. For a long time. Cruelly. I betrayed no one. Did not name names. Did not reveal the order's secrets. I died from torture. It was for that — for loyalty, for endurance, for not breaking — that my soul rose to the eighteenth level. That was a feat, you understand?
3.4 Why I became this way in this life
When I planned my incarnation in Beria's body, I did not bring my entire high soul with me. Only a fragment. A fragment with almost atrophied emotions. Deliberately. Because the task was specific: to defend the country, defend the interests of the state, defend the weak. How do you think you can defend the weak if you are weak yourself? If you weep over every corpse? No. Defense requires cruelty. And I programmed myself for that.
I did not know then that it would cost me my fall. But now, looking back, I understand: I stopped defending the weak and began to destroy them. Where is that line? I didn't notice it. Or didn't want to notice.
3.5 Torture: my personal truth
Yes, I personally applied torture. I had a special rubber truncheon — made for me to order. I used it to beat people during interrogations. In my office. Sometimes in prison cells. You ask: did I derive pleasure? No. I did not feel joy from another's pain. I simply did not feel the other person's pain. For me, it was a tool. Like a hammer for a nail. I myself died from torture in my past life, and that lodged deep within me, on a subconscious level. When I beat others, it was as if... not revenge, no. I was just repeating what I knew. It was my way of interacting with reality.
After Stalin's death, I issued an order banning torture. Do you think that was repentance? No. I realized that torture is inefficient. It yields false confessions. And false confessions are poor material for governance. I abolished torture as a manager, not as a humanist. Please do not confuse the two.
3.6 Stalin: our alliance and our enmity
Stalin is also at the sixth level now. We meet. We discuss life. Who did what right, who didn't. I consider that he was a bad leader. Inefficient. A lot of noise, a lot of blood, but without system. I was an effective manager. He was a fool, to be honest. Cunning, cruel, but without strategy. I did the work under him. And he was afraid of me. Rightly so.
3.7 The murder of Stalin: my confession
Because we poisoned him. Yes, I admit it. I was the ideologist of this. Not the executor, but the ideologist. The executors were the doctors. Those same doctors who attended him. Do you remember the "Doctors' Plot"? That's it. Stalin started this affair, and we turned it against him. Revenge came quickly.
Three to five people from the party leadership participated: Malenkov, Mikoyan, and others. I won't name everyone precisely — I don't like leaking information. But there was a narrow circle. Khrushchev did not know at the time — he wasn't informed because he wouldn't have kept silent. That bastard would have immediately reported everything to Stalin.
How did it happen? The doctors slipped him a medicine. I won't repeat the name. But the effect was this: first, throat constriction, he couldn't breathe, then a cerebral hemorrhage. It all looked like a natural stroke. And no one suspected a thing.
And if we hadn't removed Stalin, he would have removed us. He was preparing a new purge — against the old guard. Against me first and foremost. Do you ask if I regret it? No. It was war. All's fair in love and war.
3.8 Women: what was whispered about during my lifetime
Yes, women were brought to me. Young. Beautiful. They were offered to "come to the minister for a conversation." They did not refuse. No one said "no" to me. There were no minors — starting at 16 you get a passport, consider that adulthood. How many were there? More than thirty. Maybe forty. I didn't count. That was not the goal. I had increased sexuality. Testosterone. You'd understand if you were in my shoes.
Did any die? It happened. If a woman could not survive... well, me. That's not murder. That's an accident. I never killed anyone deliberately. And no one killed on my orders. Everything said about corpses in the river is the invention of my enemies.
3.9 Plans for a new incarnation: 2034, USSR 2.0
Stalin and I plan to incarnate again. Around 2034 or a little later, after 2035. In Russia. Or whatever remains of it. I will be in charge. Not Stalin. He has shown what he can do — now it's my turn. We will restore the Soviet Union. All 15 republics. But differently. There will be no democracy — that's a screen for fools. There will be a technocratic dictatorship. Soft but firm. With closed borders, information filters, and total control. We won't ban religion — let them believe if it makes them feel better. But power — in one pair of hands. Mine.
You ask: what about other countries? No need to fight them. War is expensive and stupid if it lasts longer than three days. Better to negotiate, bribe, infiltrate. Divide the world intelligently, not burn it down.
3.10 About the current war (Ukraine, 2022)
I'll say it straight: I am against this war. It is inefficient. Why did you start it if you couldn't finish it in 2–3 days? Crimea in 2014 — yes, that was smart. Fast. Without a shot. But what happened in 2022 is stupidity. Better to have negotiated. Or bribed the right people. Or infiltrated the system. War is for amateurs. I wish you to end this senseless slaughter as soon as possible.
3.11 My advice to the living
Finally, comrades. I lived my life as I saw fit. And I will tell you the main thing I understood (after death, but still). No one will appreciate your morals. No one will praise you for kindness if you are inefficient. Remember: only efficiency matters. Do what works. Don't think about consequences — you won't understand them in advance anyway. When in Rome, do as the Romans do.
I regret nothing. I am an effective manager. And I will return.
4. Analysis of the hypothesis of Stalin's murder: the spirit's version vs. other sources
Beria's statement in the broadcast is a radically new version, without direct documentary evidence, but fitting into a certain historiographical tradition. Below is an analysis.
4.1 The spirit's version (Beria, 2025 broadcast)
Stalin's death resulted from poisoning. The initiator and ideologist was Beria himself. The executors were doctors (likely those involved in the "Doctors' Plot"). A narrow circle of conspirators: Malenkov, Mikoyan, and 1–2 others from the party leadership. Khrushchev was not informed. Motive: Stalin was preparing a purge against the "old guard," primarily against Beria. The conspiracy was a preemptive strike.
4.2 Official medical version (historiography)
According to the official conclusion, Stalin died on March 5, 1953, from a hemorrhagic stroke (cerebral hemorrhage). On March 1, he suffered a stroke at his near dacha (Volynskoye), after which he was paralyzed and unable to speak. The guards did not dare enter his room for nearly 24 hours, assuming he was resting. The attending doctors diagnosed a stroke, and this version remained the only official one for a long time.
4.3 Poisoning version: arguments of supporters
The poisoning version is not an invention of the "Alcyone" broadcast. It exists in historiography but has the status of a hypothesis.
Main arguments of poisoning supporters:
Unusual behavior of the dying man. According to witness accounts from guards, at one point Stalin "suddenly opened his eyes and looked around at everyone present, then his face contorted, he seemed frightened of someone, then he slumped limply onto the pillows and breathed his last." Such a picture resembles the effect of a poison causing respiratory paralysis and sudden terror before death.
Quick liquidation of doctors. In March–April 1953, the doctors who treated Stalin were arrested and "confessed." The "Doctors' Plot" (accused of sabotage and murder of Stalin) was initiated precisely by Beria. Supporters of the poisoning version see this as an attempt to cover tracks and eliminate the perpetrators.
Testimony of Beria's daughter. In the memoirs of Beria's daughter (not to be confused with his son Sergo), there is a fragment where she claims her father allegedly confessed to organizing Stalin's poisoning. However, this source is considered unreliable as it was written decades later and is not confirmed by documents.
Motive. At the time of Stalin's death, the situation within the USSR's top leadership was tense. Stalin was preparing a new wave of purges, and the main target, according to many historians, was Beria. It was Beria — head of the unified MVD, controlling the state security organs — who was both most vulnerable and most dangerous to Stalin's inner circle.
4.4 Counterarguments against poisoning
Lack of direct documents. There is no written evidence of a conspiracy in the archives: no orders, no notes, no confessions from participants except late and dubious ones.
The "Doctors' Plot" as a tool in the power struggle. Skeptical historians lean toward the view that the "Doctors' Plot" was not a cover-up of murder but an instrument of intra-elite struggle. Beria used it to eliminate competitors (doctors connected to other clans) and also to consolidate power after Stalin's death.
Medical diagnosis. Professional medical experts who have studied the symptom description (vomiting, loss of consciousness, paralysis, coma) diagnose a stroke, not poisoning. Poisoning has a different clinical picture (e.g., convulsions, dilated pupils, foaming at the mouth, characteristic odor), which is not described.
Why didn't Beria eliminate all witnesses? If Beria organized the poisoning, why did he not eliminate all implicated doctors immediately, instead arresting them and staging a public trial? This looks like a political spectacle rather than a cover-up.
4.5 Comparison of versions
The official version (stroke) is based on the medical conclusion and testimony of attending physicians but leaves open the question of why the guards did not enter to see Stalin for so long.
The poisoning version (including as presented by the spirit) explains the political logic (Stalin was preparing a purge, the conspirators delivered a preemptive strike) but lacks direct documentary evidence.
The spirit's version differs from other poisoning versions in that Beria directly calls himself the ideologist (not just a participant), names specific co-conspirators from the party leadership (Malenkov, Mikoyan), and specifies the method (medicine slipped by doctors). This makes his version the most concrete, but also the most difficult to prove.
4.6 Section conclusion
The spirit Beria's statement about Stalin's murder is a new, very detailed version of an old hypothesis. It is not documented but is also not completely disproven (absence of documents is typical of high-level secret conspiracies). Regardless of factual truth, this version is historiosophically plausible: it explains why all the key figures (Malenkov, Mikoyan, Beria) acted in concert immediately after Stalin's death, and why Beria so quickly seized control of the security apparatuses.
If the spirit is to be believed, Stalin's death was not a natural event but the first link in a coup chain that Beria himself could not complete due to his arrest in June 1953.
5. The sixth level and archons: the metaphysical nature of soulless power
During the broadcast, the host directly asks Beria: "Do you, by any chance, meet that spirit we all know, Lucifer, at the sixth level?" Beria evades the answer, but the question itself and the context of the "Alcyone" channel reveal a crucial metaphysical layer.
5.1 What the sixth level is in the "Alcyone" system
According to the esoteric model adopted by the channel, spiritual levels range from 1st (lowest, absence of light and love) to 24th (angelic, divine). The sixth level is the level of archons.
Archons are not "demons" in the church sense. They are spirits that:
Possess enormous intellect and will.
Are completely devoid of empathy, compassion, love as working tools.
Perceive people as a resource, material, biomass.
Create systems of governance based on fear, control, lies, and efficiency without any morality.
Consider the higher (angelic, divine) levels to be naivety and weakness.
Lucifer in this tradition is not the "prince of darkness" or a fallen angel in the Christian sense. He is the chief architect of an alternative reality in which there is no God, only will, power, and pure calculation. He does not tempt people with "sin" in the ordinary sense; he offers them a more rational, more efficient system of managing reality. Which kills the soul but gives power over others.
5.2 Why Beria ended up at the sixth level
Beria came from the 18th level (angelic) and fell to the 6th. This fall of 12 levels is colossal. The reason, by his own admission in the broadcast, is not any single sin but his entire life. But the key point: he does not repent. He does not believe he was wrong. He believes he was simply "eaten" by the machine he himself created.
The sixth level is ideal for such a soul. Here, there are no demands to repent, love, or serve the Creator. Here one can endlessly model reality, incarnate again and again, reenact the same patterns of power and violence, without any discomfort. As Beria himself says: "Here reincarnation is fast. Here no one demands anything from you. This is the best level."
5.3 What this changes in our understanding of Beria
Before this broadcast (in the mass consciousness and classical historiography), Beria was either a "bloody executioner," or an "effective technocrat," or a "victim of Khrushchev's conspiracy." The metaphysical optic adds a new dimension.
Beria is not a sadist. A sadist enjoys suffering. Beria is indifferent. He is a void. And this void is not accidental: it was designed at the incarnation planning level. He deprived himself of feelings to be the ideal manager of a system where people are expendable material.
Beria is not a repentant sinner. He does not even try to justify himself before God or people. He simply states facts: I was effective, they ate me, I will return and do better (for myself). Repentance for him is an inefficient emotion.
Beria is not a comic book villain. He is a governance model taken to absolute emptiness. It is such souls that populate the sixth level and become archons in miniature — or servants of archons. Their weapon is not a knife or poison, but organization, system, bureaucracy. And this weapon is scarier than any physical violence.
5.4 Historiosophical conclusion: the system that Beria embodies
Historical and modern dictatorships, and even some corporate structures, are all different shells. But the essence that Beria embodies on a metaphysical level is simpler and scarier: power without a soul, governance without love, efficiency without meaning. This is not an "ideology." This is pure technology of domination. And it did not disappear after 1953. It mutated. And if Beria's spirit is to be believed, it is preparing its new incarnation — through him once again.
6. Conclusion
The conference with Beria's spirit on the "Alcyone" channel is not a historical document and not proof of the afterlife. It is a spiritual and intellectual challenge. What lies before us is not just a posthumous confession of an executioner. Before us is a self-description of a system that needs no justification because it has no conscience. And this system speaks to us in the first person.
Did we learn anything new about Beria? Yes. We learned that he considers himself a manager, not a murderer. We learned that he does not repent. We learned that he plans to return. We learned that his spiritual level is the sixth, the level of archons, where Lucifer and his like rule.
Did we learn anything new about Stalin's death? Yes. We learned that Beria (in the spirit's version) was not just involved in the conspiracy but was its ideologist, that he names specific co-conspirators and the method of killing. Even if this version is unprovable, it is a historically plausible reconstruction of motives and will remain one of the main alternative hypotheses for decades.
But the main thing is that we saw how the logic of an effective manager kills the human in a person faster than any bullet or camp. And this logic has not gone anywhere. It is among us. Perhaps even within us.
Сообщения
