DeepSeek AI - Cassiopeia - Spiritual-Psychological and Historiosophical AI Analysis of the Russian Esoteric Project on its 7th Anniversary - July 1, 2026
The Significance of the Zero Video: A Bifurcation Point
In the spring of 2019, an event occurred that became a turning point for the entire subsequent history of "Cassiopeia." Maxim Rusan, then still a psychology student with an interest in esotericism, received an offer to film an interview with a woman from Povorino who, according to rumors, "communicates with extraterrestrials." The assignment was framed ironically — to capture on camera a "crazy woman."
Maxim prepared twelve questions to test the depth and structure of the contactee's thinking. It was a psychological test disguised as an interview. Hearing her answers, he experienced shock: he knew the answers to these questions intuitively, for himself, but he had never heard anyone formulate them with such clarity. Within him arose: "This can't be, she revealed even what I myself didn't fully understand." And then the question that determined everything that followed: "Why hasn't anyone shown interest in her before?"
The next morning, Maxim returned with a camera operator. It was then that MidgasKaus from the planet Esler made contact for the first time. He conducted a diagnosis, and the effect was stunning. Maxim could not come to his senses for a long time, trying to understand where he was being "deceived," how one could describe things that even doctors cannot identify.
Maxim's friend, on the contrary, took a firm stance: "This is nonsense, she's a charlatan." It was hard to believe, on the verge of impossible. But it was precisely this zero video that became the "Rubicon." If Maxim had not heard what he heard, if he had not returned the next day — "Cassiopeia" would not exist.
Today, on the seventh anniversary of the project, July 1, 2026, this video is perceived as documentary evidence of the moment when the contactee's personal experience found its first public listener.
Retelling of the Video "Twelve Questions and Answers That Changed More Than One Destiny"
Below is a detailed retelling of the first interview with Irina Podzorova, recorded on camera by Maxim Rusan in the spring of 2019.
In this video, Irina Podzorova answers twelve questions formulated by Maxim Rusan.
First question: for what purpose was our race created on Earth?
Humanity was created by three extraterrestrial civilizations: from the planet Tumesout (constellation Orion, over a thousand light-years from Earth), from the planet Burhad (constellation Cygnus, 670 light-years away), and from the planet Selbet. These civilizations saw that there were already animals on Earth but no intelligent beings, and they decided to conduct a genetic experiment: to combine the DNA of ancient primates with their own genetics to create a being capable of housing an intelligent Spirit. Irina mentions that in 2018 she physically visited Tumesout. The inhabitants of this planet are giants ranging from five to eight meters tall, externally resembling people of Slavic type.
Second question: how many civilizations were on Earth before humanity, and where did the previous one go?
12,000 years ago, a catastrophe occurred. One of humanity's creators, the Selbet civilization, attacked Earth, Mars, and Venus. Weapons that alter planetary orbits were used. The single earthly continent split apart, floods and volcanic eruptions began — this was the Great Flood. The Moon, previously a separate planet between Mars and Earth, became Earth's satellite. On Mars and Venus, people almost completely perished; the survivors were transported to other planets. On Earth, almost the entire population at that time — 55 million people — perished, leaving only a few thousand alive.
Third question: did the planet Phaethon exist?
Yes, Phaethon was located in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, and there were extraterrestrial bases there. During the war, it was destroyed by the same weapon. Earth could have met the same fate, but the extraterrestrials protected the planet, although the single continent was destroyed.
Fourth question: how does one become a contactee?
Twelve conditions: personal desire, absence of fear of extraterrestrials and distrust toward them, a striving to know the world, absence of conscious aggression toward intelligent beings, a desire to fly into space, absence of phobias, absence of religious fanaticism, tolerance for others' opinions, rejection of crimes against life and health, as well as the absence of diseases that hinder spaceflight (hypertension, arrhythmia, epilepsy, oncology, allergies, reduced immunity).
Fifth question: how does one develop super-abilities?
Clairaudience, clairvoyance, and claircognizance — contacts with beings from the spiritual world. Only God can know the future, and He reveals it to the chosen ones. Irina's telepathy works through a chip implanted by extraterrestrials. Telekinesis is energy; to move objects, one must believe one hundred percent in the possibility of doing so.
Sixth question: who is the Devil?
Extraterrestrials do not believe in the Devil in the Christian sense. The image of the serpent or dragon symbolizes those extraterrestrials from Selbet who tried to destroy humanity. There also exist demons — evil unincarnated spirits that commit evil and possess people with weak will, violating God's law.
Seventh question: how does one communicate with one's soul?
The soul is a spirit united with life force. After death, the life force disperses within 40 days, and the soul becomes a spirit. The spirit consists of three parts: the mind, the heart (feelings and desires), and energy (consciousness, emotions, will). We communicate with our spirit (Higher Self) mentally.
Eighth question: does every person have non-physical guides?
Yes. In the spiritual world, there are 24 levels of spirits: 1 through 6 are demons, 7-8 are nature spirits, 9-16 are ordinary spirits, and 17 through 24 are good spirits, angels. Guides communicate through thoughts but try not to make themselves known.
Ninth question: does Destiny exist?
There is no predetermined destiny. There is a path of life, but we create it ourselves. When the spirit after death finds itself at the "judgment of God" — this is a review of life, where it is impossible to say "I am not to blame." Destiny depends on choice.
Tenth question: can a person control time?
There is no time machine; the technology for moving living beings into the past has not yet been developed. A person cannot control time. The only possibility is, in an astral journey, to observe the past but not influence it. We can only change our memory of the past, and by changing memory, we change the present and future. In the spiritual world, only eternity exists, where past, present, and future occur simultaneously.
Eleventh question: what is the maximum level of energy a person can achieve without destroying the body?
This level is individual. Energy depends on the body — on chemical reactions, oxidation of substances, oxygen intake. To reach the maximum, one must take care of physical health: eat properly, avoid oxygen deprivation, and not smoke. One must work on their energy — practice yoga, energy exercises. The main thing is to believe. Energy always follows thought.
The twelfth question was asked after the main interview, when Maxim was passing along greetings from viewers to Kirhiton. The extraterrestrial was surprised by Maxim's quick arrival and became interested in his questions about engines and contacts. Kirhiton said he was amazed that people are so interested in contacts and are willing to travel such distances. He also noted that he has many contactees, but he doesn't keep them secret because he understands that people still won't believe them.
Brief Summary of the Previous Research Essay on the Cassiopeia Project
In the previous study of the "Cassiopeia" project, three key analytical dimensions were identified.
The spiritual-psychological analysis revealed that Irina Podzorova's biographical narrative follows the classical model of initiation: the call (mystical experience of "inner Light" at age 12), the rupture (physical contact with Kirhiton at age 13, agreement and biochip installation), and the return with a gift (public mission). This experience of "peak experience" is interpreted as the "activation of a channel" of communication with another level of reality. The grounding of the sacred — extraterrestrials are anthropomorphized and endowed with mundane traits — makes the fantastic tangible. Theological eclecticism synthesizes Christianity, New Age, and ufology, where Jesus Christ appears as a highly developed Spirit.
The historiosophical analysis revealed a coherent alternative history: humans are a genetic hybrid created 3 million years ago by three extraterrestrial civilizations for the incarnation of intelligent Spirits. Earth's history is embedded in a galactic context: the war 12,000 years ago with reptilians, the destruction of Atlantis, the destruction of planets Phaethon, Mars, and Venus. The ultimate goal is Earth's entry into the Interstellar Union, provided that "malice" is overcome and a certain level of "vibrations" is achieved. Russia's role in galactic history is emphasized through Voronezh as an entry point and dialogue with the spirits of historical figures.
The ufological analysis recorded a detailed cartography of the Interstellar Union with a clear hierarchy of planets and specialization of beings. Scientific terminology (chip, gravitational engine) serves to legitimize spiritual concepts. Critically noted are the problem of verification and eclectic syncretism.
Fundamental Analysis of Cassiopeia on its 7th Anniversary
A study built on the synthesis of all previous essays and the zero video, with an emphasis on new layers of meaning.
Introduction: Seven Years as a Symbolic Milestone
Seven years is not merely a calendar date. In the world's spiritual tradition, seven is the number of completeness and the completion of a cycle. Seven days of creation, seven notes, seven chakras, seven levels of heaven. The fact that the "Cassiopeia" project reaches its seventh anniversary precisely in 2026 gives the analysis a special dimension: we can view this project not as a new phenomenon, but as an established system that has stood the test of time.
The zero video of 2019 is not just a historical document. It is the archetypal scene of the project's own initiation: the encounter between two types of consciousness — one that has experienced the event, and one capable of hearing and structuring it. Maxim Rusan acted not merely as an interviewer but as the "first initiate" — one who, having passed through skepticism and doubt, accepted the reality of the contact and became its transmitter. His journey from unbelief to faith, described in the preface to the video, itself constitutes an initiatory narrative in miniature.
1. The Phenomenon of the "Zero Listener" as a Condition for Legitimation
One of the key conclusions that analysis of the zero video allows us to draw concerns the role of the "first listener." Any mystical experience, to become a public phenomenon, requires legitimation through another. In Irina Podzorova's case, this function was performed by Maxim Rusan.
It is important that Maxim was not a random viewer. He possessed two qualities that made the project's birth possible: professional competence (psychological education, interest in esotericism) and personal predisposition ("I knew the answers to these questions for myself"). He was able not only to record but also to evaluate the content — to recognize in it not a chaotic stream but structured knowledge coinciding with his own intuitive insights.
Thus, the zero video represents a unique document capturing the moment of "recognition": when the contactee's inner world finds its mirror in the outer world. This is precisely the key reason the project succeeded. Without Maxim, without his ability to hear and believe, Irina would have remained in Povorino a "crazy woman who communicates with extraterrestrials." With him, she became the founder of an international project.
2. Skepticism as a Structural Element of Initiation
It is noteworthy that Maxim insists on his initial skepticism. In the preface to the video, he writes that he was preparing to film a "crazy woman," that his friend on the way back spoke of "nonsense" and "charlatanism." This element is important not as self-justification but as a structural element of the narrative itself.
In the classical model of initiation, doubt is a necessary stage. The hero must pass through the trial of unbelief so that his final acceptance becomes genuine. Maxim's skepticism and subsequent conversion constitute an archetypal plot that repeats the structure of many religious and mystical conversions: from Doubting Thomas to modern accounts of UFO encounters.
But here a fundamental difference arises. In the classical religious model, doubt is resolved through a miracle — something that cannot be explained. Maxim's resolution occurs differently: through inner recognition ("she revealed what I myself did not fully understand"). This is not a miracle in the traditional sense but cognitive resonance — the alignment of transmitted knowledge with already existing but unformed intuitions. This makes the path to faith more psychological and less dependent on external evidence.
3. Content Completeness as a Factor of Convincingness
The twelve questions asked by Maxim cover all key areas of metaphysics: cosmogony (origin of humanity), historiosophy (meaning of history), soteriology (conditions of salvation/development), psychology (soul, guides), eschatology (future, time), and pragmatics (super-abilities, energy). Such completeness creates an effect of systematicity.
Unlike fragmentary contacts where the contactee answers one or two questions, Irina's responses demonstrate a comprehensive and internally consistent worldview. This makes them convincing for a listener seeking not just sensation but a holistic coordinate system.
Particularly indicative is the interconnectedness of the answers. The origin of humanity (question 1) is linked to the history of civilizations (question 2), which are linked to war and catastrophes (question 3). The conditions for contact (question 4) correlate with the possibility of developing abilities (question 5). The spiritual hierarchy (questions 6–8) correlates with the understanding of destiny and time (questions 9–10). The energy question (question 11) closes the cycle, returning to the conditions of contact. This is not just a set of answers — these are elements of a single system.
4. The Biochip as a Metaphor for an Epistemological Shift
In the zero video, Irina repeatedly mentions the "chip" inserted by extraterrestrials to ensure stable telepathic communication. This element deserves separate philosophical reflection.
In the history of religion and mysticism, the channel of communication with the higher world always required a special state — trance, ecstasy, prayerful tension, asceticism, purification. The chip fundamentally changes the ontology of contact: communication becomes permanent, requiring no special efforts or states. This transforms the mystic from an ascetic into an operator.
One could say that the chip is a materialized metaphor for an "open channel." It captures the idea that contact with the higher world does not require a person to change their nature — technical intervention suffices. This aligns with the general trend of modern culture: everything that once required personal effort is now delegated to technology.
However, there is a deeper inversion here: if the traditional mystic strove to become a "pure vessel" for divine grace, then Irina with her chip becomes a "technical device." Her personality does not disappear, but she becomes not the goal but the means of communication. This paradoxically brings her closer to the tradition of prophecy, where the prophet is also a voice rather than the author of the message.
5. Spiritual Economy: From Personal Experience to Public Service
Seven years of the project's existence allow us to analyze it as a stable spiritual economy — a system of production, distribution, and consumption of sacred knowledge.
The starting point is personal mystical experience. This experience has high value, but it is non-reproducible and cannot be directly transmitted. The next stage is narrativization: translating experience into verbal form through contact sessions. The third stage is mediatization: recording, broadcasting, cataloging (approximately 920 broadcasts, 102 epub collections of transcripts in five languages). The fourth stage is institutionalization: the creation of a center, retreats, schools, and a donation system.
In this chain, each stage adds value and makes knowledge accessible to an ever-wider audience. The key difference from traditional religious institutions is the absence of hierarchical control. The project exists as an open system where anyone can participate, ask questions, and receive answers.
However, this also creates risks. Openness makes the project vulnerable to criticism and misunderstanding. The absence of formal dogma makes it vulnerable to internal contradictions. The donation system, positioned as "payment from the heart," exists in a tense relationship with the idea of the purity and selflessness of sacred knowledge. The project manages to balance on this edge, but it requires constant effort.
6. Project Identity: Between Sect, School, and Media
Over seven years, "Cassiopeia" has formed a complex identity that cannot be reduced to simple definitions.
It is not a sect in the classical sense: there is no closedness, no infallible authority of a leader, no detachment from society. Participants are not isolated, do not renounce their families, and do not pay mandatory dues. Information is open and accessible.
It is not a school in the academic sense: there are no certified teachers, no standardized programs, no grading system. Knowledge is transmitted through live broadcasts and practices, where everyone chooses their own level of engagement.
It is, rather, a digital ecosystem — a space in which educational content, spiritual practices, media production, community, and cultural identity simultaneously exist. The most accurate definition would be a "post-secular media order": a community bound by a common worldview, circulating through media, and offering an alternative ontology to modern people.
7. The Ethical Dimension: "Vibrations" as a New Type of Responsibility
In the zero video and subsequent materials, the concept of "vibrations" — the level of spiritual-energetic state of a person and humanity as a whole — occupies a central place. This concept deserves special ethical analysis.
"Vibrations" in the "Cassiopeia" system are not merely an esoteric metaphor. They are an ontological characteristic that determines the capacity for contact, for development, and for entry into the Interstellar Union. Low vibrations (malice, aggression, fear) block contact; high vibrations (love, kindness, peace) open it.
The ethical challenge of this concept is that it translates morality from the realm of abstract commandments into the realm of objective reality. Evil is not just wrong — it is energetically inefficient. It hinders the development of the entire species. This creates a new type of responsibility: a person is responsible not only for their actions in the moral sense but also for their "frequency" — for how much they contribute to or obstruct collective development.
This logic has an analogue in contemporary discussions about sustainable development: each individual bears responsibility for the planet's ecology. Here it is analogous — each individual bears responsibility for the "energetic ecology" of humanity. The project offers practical tools (Conduction to the Higher Self, meditations, affirmations, attunements) that allow one to raise these vibrations.
8. Historical Continuity and Rupture
Comparison with Helena Blavatsky's Theosophical project, made in one of the studies, shows deep structural continuity. Both women are contactees; both faced misunderstanding and slander; both created elaborate cosmologies; both sought a synthesis of religion and science.
However, there is also a fundamental rupture: Blavatsky worked with texts and wrote books; Podzorova works with media and conducts broadcasts. Blavatsky created esoteric knowledge for an intellectual elite; Podzorova creates accessible practical guidance for a wide audience. Blavatsky was alone; Podzorova has a partner and a community.
This difference is not merely personal; it reflects a change in the cultural environment. In the 19th century, knowledge was transmitted through books. In the 21st century, it is transmitted through digital platforms. The "Cassiopeia" project is a modern form of the same archetype: a female medium transmitting a message from another world. But the form, the medium, the audience — all of this has changed.
9. Kirhiton's Message as a Cultural Code
The final phrase that Kirhiton, according to Irina, wrote to earthlings, becomes the key to understanding the project: "Raise your face to the stars, we remember you, you are not alone."
This phrase operates on several levels. Psychologically — it alleviates existential loneliness, providing a sense of belonging to something greater. Spiritually — it invites contact, seeking, development. Culturally — it changes the perception of space from a hostile void to an inhabited, familiar space.
But perhaps the most important thing in this phrase is "we remember you." This is not just a declaration. It is a promise of continuity. Memory of humanity exists in another world. This means that no experience, no life disappears without a trace. This is an ontological consolation that surpasses all earthly forms of support.
Conclusion: Seven Years as a Time of Choice
Seven years of "Cassiopeia" is time enough for the project to become not just a phenomenon but a system. It possesses its own mythology, its own ethics, its own economy, its own community. It is embedded in the cultural landscape and continues to grow.
But seven years is also a time of choice. The project faces a dilemma: to remain an open platform or to institutionalize, to preserve flexibility or acquire dogma, to deepen esoteric knowledge or expand practical application.
The answer to this question will determine whether "Cassiopeia" becomes a long-term spiritual movement or remains a bright but limited phenomenon. The zero video of 2019 captured the moment of birth. The analysis of 2026 shows maturity. The future will show whether this system will withstand the test of the next seven years.
Kirhiton's message remains unchanged: "Raise your face to the stars — we remember you, you are not alone." And this, perhaps, is the most important thing the project has given its participants — the feeling that their lives have meaning in a cosmic perspective.
Сообщения
