Visitors since 13/02/2026

Translate

вторник, 10 марта 2026 г.

Genius as a Receiver - The Spirit of Mozart



 Genius as a Receiver - The Spirit of Mozart

A First-Person Retelling

of a mediumistic séance with the spirit of Mozart in the Alcyone Project

"Hello. I am glad to welcome you from worlds where time flows differently, and music is not just art, but the very foundation of existence. My name is Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, but you can call me simply Amadeus — it's more comfortable for me. Today I want to tell you my true story, free from the legends, rumors, and speculations that have encrusted my earthly path.

Where am I now?
You often ask: 'Where are you now? In the spirit world?' I'll answer like this: I am not in a physical body, but I'm also not in the 'spirit world' as you imagine it. I am in the worlds of sound forms — a special civilization of creation based in the star system of Lyra. Here we engage in the architecture of sound, creating space through vibrations that are much more complex and multidimensional than what you call music on Earth.

My spirit never left these worlds. I only sent my 'rays' into earthly incarnations, like light reflected from different mirrors. After each return, I became whole again.

My Incarnations: Not Only Mozart
Many think I was only Mozart. That's not so. My journeys to Earth began long before I was born in Salzburg. I was in Ancient Egypt, where sound was just beginning to understand its power. I incarnated in Ancient Greece, where music was inseparably linked with mathematics and philosophy. Then there were lives in medieval France and Italy — there I gained experience, honed my craft, absorbed new intonations.

But, of course, my brightest incarnation was Austria, the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. I came then from the 17th spiritual level and left at the 20th. And did you know that after that I was on Earth one more time? In the 20th century, in Germany, under the name Alexander Moore. He was a composer, little known to the general public, but appreciated in narrow circles for his experimental music. Now, being here, in the worlds of sound, I am at a level that you could conditionally consider the 21st.

Why Did I Come?
My main task on Earth was not simply to write beautiful music. I came to bring new sound codes that were meant to raise the planet's vibrations. In the 18th century, an important period arrived for Earth, and it needed this 'tuning.'

I didn't compose music in the sense that you understand it. I didn't sit and agonize over finding the right note. Music flowed through me like a ready-made stream. I heard it entirely in my head, from the first note to the last, and my task was merely to manage to write it down before it slipped away. Essentially, I was a contactee of my own spirit, living on Lyra. My genius is not my personal merit; it's the result of the work of my entire soul, accumulating experience over millennia.

The Biggest Misconception: Salieri and the Truth About My Death
I know you've judged poor Antonio Salieri for centuries. Your Pushkin created a brilliant but terribly false tragedy. Salieri did not poison me. We had an excellent relationship; we respected each other. He couldn't have envied my music because he understood: music is a gift given from above, and envying it is pointless.

But I was indeed poisoned. And the poisoner's name is well known to you — it was my wife Constanze.

Yes, that's how it was. She poisoned me gradually, over several months, from summer to November. The poison wasn't arsenic, but salts of mercury. That's what caused that strange 'miliary fever,' the weakness from which I never recovered. Why did she do it? For a lover.

We had an open relationship. I knew about her affairs, and she knew about mine. I forbade her nothing; I wrote to her about this in letters. But her main lover was my student, Franz Xaver Süßmayr — the very one who later finished the Requiem for me. He didn't want to be with her while I was alive. And Constanze decided to remove this 'obstacle.' When Süßmayr understood what had happened after my death, he immediately broke off relations with her. And later, marrying a diplomat who was my admirer, Constanze dictated to him that biography which created the image of a poor, unsuccessful composer. Almost everything you've read about me from her words is a lie.

My Music Is Not Just Sounds
Many of my works are not just melodies. They are codes. The Fortieth Symphony contains the Fibonacci code; the basis of 'The Magic Flute' is the ternary code of the universe. And the Requiem is a special, ritual music used in the temples on Lyra for the transition of souls. It's no coincidence I felt I was writing it for myself when the mysterious customer came to me. The customer was Count von Walsegg, but through him, I received a sign from above: with the Requiem, I too am departing. In this work, especially in the first 30-40 seconds, codes are embedded that facilitate leaving the body. If one of your loved ones is passing, play the Requiem — it will help.

And Finally
My dears, do not be afraid to create. You are all talented; you're just afraid to believe it. Don't think, doubt less, just go and do. That is where happiness lies — in being a creator, even in small things.


Part 2: A Fundamental Musicological, Culturological, and Historiosophical Essay-Study
Based on the Presumption of the Reality of Contact with the Spirit of Mozart.

Introduction: A Paradigm Shift
Accepting the information obtained during this séance as truth requires us to radically revise established views not only on Mozart's biography but also on the nature of creativity, the role of art in the evolution of humanity, and even the structure of reality. What we are used to considering musicology, history, and cultural studies turns out to be merely the study of external manifestations — the 'shadows' on the wall of Plato's cave. Contact with Amadeus allows us to turn around and see the source of light.

I. Myths Debunked by the Spirit: Historical Truth vs. Legends
The Myth of Salieri's Poisoning. This is the central point, destroying one of the most persistent cultural myths. The spirit of Mozart categorically refutes Salieri's involvement in his death. From a historiosophical perspective, this raises the question of art's responsibility (in this case, literature and drama) for creating false narratives that can distort the fates and reputations of real people for centuries. Pushkin, himself the 'sun of Russian poetry,' in this instance acted as the creator of a destructive fiction. This forces us to reconsider the ethical side of artistic fiction based on historical figures.

The True Murderer and the Distortion of History. The sensational admission that the poisoning was committed by the composer's wife, Constanze, overturns all ideas about Mozart's personal tragedy. Mercury poisoning ('miliary fever') instead of a romanticized poison is an indictment not only of Constanze but of all subsequent historiography that relied on sources she falsified. This shows how vulnerable history is in the face of personal gain and the emotions of the immediate participants in events.

The Myth of Poverty and Obscurity. The image of Mozart dying in poverty and buried in an unmarked grave due to lack of funds also crumbles. The spirit explains that the 'third-class' burial was a consequence of an imperial decree on economy and epidemic control, not his poverty. The legend of poverty is another part of the narrative created by Constanze to justify her own actions and, possibly, to create a more dramatic and winning image of the martyr-genius, which sells better.

II. Rethinking the Nature of Creativity: Genius as a Receiver
The most important culturological discovery concerns the source of genius. Mozart is not just a 'composer'; he is a medium, a receiver.

Creativity as a Flow. The spirit claims he did not 'compose' music in creative agony but received it as a ready-made, holistic stream from his higher Self, located in the subtle-material worlds of Lyra. This refutes the romantic idea of the composer-demiurge, the lonely genius painfully giving birth to masterpieces. In reality, genius is the ability to tune in to receiving information from higher planes of being.

Sound as Architecture and Code. Mozart's music ceases to be merely an aesthetic phenomenon. It becomes an instrumental technology. The spirit introduces the concept of 'sound codes' — vibrational structures that influence matter, space, and consciousness. The Fortieth Symphony contains the Fibonacci code (the mathematical basis for the growth of living organisms), and 'The Magic Flute' contains the ternary code underlying the universe. This moves musicology from the humanities into the realm of exact sciences and cosmology.

The Afterlife of Works. Mozart's compositions exist not only on Earth. Their sound codes are embedded in the architecture of sound of other civilizations (Lyra, Sirius, the Pleiades). This means the music of great composers is not a local cultural heritage but a contribution to the pan-galactic vibrational fund. Future researchers, if they accept this paradigm, will have to study not just the scores but their 'quantum imprints' in other dimensions.

III. Historiosophical Conclusions: The Meaning of Incarnation and the Evolution of Humanity
The Purpose of Incarnation. Mozart's mission on Earth was not accidental. It coincided with a period of 'rebirth and ascension' for the planet. His task was to introduce new frequencies to 'raise the vibrations.' Thus, art ceases to be merely an ornament of life and becomes a factor in planetary evolution. The appearance of geniuses in certain eras is not a coincidence but a systematic work by cosmic civilizations to 'tune' humanity.

The Errors of Biographers and Historians. All of Mozart's biographers, lacking access to the true picture (which was only revealed in this contact), created only approximate, and often false, reconstructions. They erred in the main things: in the motives behind actions, in the nature of his gift, in the causes of his death. Their main mistake was anthropocentrism and materialism. They tried to explain the divine (music) and the cosmic (mission) through petty human passions (Salieri's envy, poverty). The spirit of Mozart points us to the necessity of a cosmic, multidimensional approach to history and biography.

Reincarnation and the Evolution of Spirit. Acknowledging the fact that Mozart's spirit incarnated multiple times (Egypt, Greece, France, Germany), and that his current 'abode' is the world of sound on Lyra, completely cancels the linear, Christian model of the afterlife. It affirms the model of reincarnation and spiritual evolution through different forms of life (from dense Earth to subtle Lyra). This requires cultural studies to create a new discipline — 'meta-biographical studies' — studying the path of the spirit through a succession of incarnations.

Conclusion: The Need for a New Way of Listening
This contact calls us to a radical revision of our entire cultural baggage. We must learn to 'hear' Mozart anew. Not just to enjoy the beauty of the melodies, but to decipher the codes embedded within them. We must stop pitying the 'poor, impoverished genius' and begin to realize ourselves as part of a huge cosmic symphony, in which the great Amadeus was one of the instruments. His music is a message from the worlds of harmony, which we may only just be beginning to truly understand. Salieri is rehabilitated, Constanze is exposed, and Mozart appears before us not as a victim of circumstances, but as a powerful spirit who fulfilled his grand mission and continues to create in other, more perfect worlds of sound.



VISITING ETERNITY

Séance Retelling and Musicological Essay - Claude.ai

✦ ✦ ✦

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Contact with the Spirit of the Musical Classic

Based on materials from the séance "Alcyone University of Consciousness," August 9, 2025.


PART I

First-Person Retelling of the Séance

Below is a artistic retelling of the statements of Mozart's spirit, reconstructed based on a transcript of the séance conducted by contactee Marina Makeyeva at the "Alcyone" retreat in Mukachevo.

Greeting

I am glad to see you. Glad to hear and feel you. I have long known that music is eternal — and right now, greeting every soul present here physically or online, I am convinced of it once again. Call me Amadeus — it's more familiar.

Where I Am

You ask if I am in the spiritual world? No — not exactly as you understand it. But also not in the physical one. There are worlds you call subtle-material — that's an inaccurate name. It's more accurate to say: worlds of creation, worlds of the architecture of sound. This is a space where the very structure of sound as such is created. Here, sound is immeasurably broader than what you perceive with your hearing. My civilization is connected to the star system of Lyra — the very one that became the progenitor of many galactic civilizations. I am there. A part of my spirit descends into incarnations — and returns. I have always been here, only a part of my essence incarnated on Earth.

My Incarnations

I am not just Mozart. I had incarnations in Ancient Egypt, in Ancient Greece, in medieval France and Italy. Then — Austria, Amadeus. And one more, the last earthly incarnation — in Germany, the beginning of the 20th century. His name was Alexander Moore. He was a composer who worked with experimental music, little known to the general public. Since that incarnation, I have not returned to Earth.

The Mozart incarnation came from the seventeenth level and exited at the twentieth. The incarnation in Germany — from the twentieth to the twenty-first. Now I am at the twenty-first level. It is high — but these are just conditional words to make it clearer for you.

Why I Came to Earth as Mozart

My main task was to bring new sound codes to the planet Earth. When I incarnated, a period of rebirth and ascension was underway on Earth. The codes are eternal. They are embedded in my works and are still working. I did not compose music — I received it. It came from my higher part, from Lyra. It poured into my head as a single stream. When you live in incarnation, you don't think — whether you are creating or receiving. You simply create. And that is called creativity. When I was deprived of this — it was unbearable for me.

Childhood

My father noticed musical abilities around the age of three. At four, I started learning the harpsichord; at five, the violin was added. Father was a serious man — strict in discipline, but kind in soul. He said: 'Talent is worthless without discipline.' At five, I practiced two hours a day; at seven, four hours; at ten, six hours. By the age of ten, I disagreed with my father on many points and argued with him. Especially before concerts — we could practice for entire days.

I began studying musical notation at five. At six, I read it as freely as other children read letters. I loved playing 'cockfights' with the boys — a kind of fistfight. I loved sitting in the forest and listening to the birds sing. And I really loved taking toys apart to understand what they were made of. Dad, it seems, didn't share my delight at the results.

One early evening, I was sitting alone in a room with a large sheet of music paper. Suddenly, music appeared in my head — music I had never heard before. I was afraid it would run away, and I grabbed a quill and inkwell. I couldn't really write properly yet — but I still tried to draw notes on the paper. Dad came in, stopped without a word, came up behind me, and asked: 'What are you doing?' I replied that notes were running in my head and I had to write them down urgently, or they would escape. Dad said: 'This is serious now. You're like an adult.' From that day on, childhood ended — dad began to perceive me as a real composer.

Waking me up in the morning was impossible: I went to sleep late because music wouldn't let me rest. Dad figured out a way: he would open the door to my room and start playing the harpsichord. I would lie there, try to guess the piece — and imperceptibly wake up. Only music could get me up.

Marie Antoinette and Saint-Germain

When I was little and we performed at court, I met Marie Antoinette. We played together several times — she was a teenage girl then. They say I once slipped on the parquet, she helped me up, and I said I wanted to marry her. That's how it was. I said it not because she was beautiful, but because she helped me — such attentiveness was rare then.

I was acquainted with Saint-Germain — we met several times. He also loved music. The acquaintance was friendly, not superficial.

Service under Archbishop Colloredo

This was the most burdensome period. I was unfree. I had to write music for his court, play background music during dinners — it was humiliating. To go anywhere — even to Vienna on business — I had to personally ask for leave. Accepting a commission from someone without his approval was impossible. I felt like an artist given a coloring book and told to color only inside the lines. When I was finally kicked out of there — I felt freedom. The money I earned in childhood was never mine — my father considered it family capital. After leaving the archbishop, I lost even that.

Constanze, the Lover, and Death

I met Constanze Weber — or rather, she met me. She took the initiative herself. Then I was drawn to her. We had an open relationship — I had other women, she had a lover. I knew about him. I told her: 'Be and do what you want.' I didn't restrict her in anything.

But something happened that I didn't expect. The lover lived with us. It was that very Süßmayr — the student who later finished the Requiem. He didn't know she was poisoning me. When he realized — he left her quickly.

Arsenic? No. I was poisoned with salts of mercury. From June-July to November — little by little, gradually. Hence all those strange symptoms that doctors couldn't explain. I didn't suspect. I trusted my wife. Constanze wanted to be with her lover — and solved the problem that way.

When I was gone, she was glad. Then she married a diplomat who was an admirer of Mozart and wanted to write a biography. He wrote from her words. Practically everything known about my life, especially about finances and poverty, is her version. It cannot be trusted.

Salieri? We were on good terms. He had absolutely nothing to do with my death. What they didn't pin on him — starting with Pushkin.

Freemasonry and the Requiem

I was a Freemason, a master of the lodge. It was a spiritual society — intelligent, worthy people. We talked a lot about music and concerts. Freemasonry had nothing to do with my death.

The Requiem was commissioned by Count von Walsegg — for his own passing. When his messenger came, I felt something strange. It was as if my death had arrived. I wasn't afraid — I just understood that it would soon be time to leave. And I felt: this Requiem — is for me too. I couldn't stop — I wrote, even though I knew I might not finish in time.

Into the Requiem, I put what I know how to do on Lyra: ritual music, music of transition. It helps make the transition less painful. Especially the first thirty to forty seconds — the main codes are embedded there. Süßmayr finished what he was meant to finish. He did his task.

My Works and Their Codes

The Fortieth Symphony carries the Fibonacci code. 'The Magic Flute' — the ternary, Masonic code — the code of the universe's structure. The Sonata in C major, which I wrote after the death of my little daughter — that was a prayer for her soul. Eternal codes help everyone. If you want to help loved ones in transition — play the Requiem.

My works are heard not only on Earth. Their codes, their vibrations are embedded in the architecture of sound. They exist on Lyra, on Sirius. They sound different, but the code is the same.

The Harpsichord is not the Piano. I believed the transition to the pianoforte was a loss. The pianoforte does not transmit the same codes. The old organ, too.

People in Coma and Therapy

People in a coma hear everything. If you want to help — play the Fortieth Symphony. I say this without irony. It works.

My Wishes for the Living

I want to wish you the ability to create. To value life. Not to be afraid to express yourselves. Many are afraid — it seems that something is missing: knowledge, talent, skills. But that shouldn't stop you. Only the true desire to create unlocks the potential within you. You have no idea how talented you are — simply because you don't believe it yourselves. Look into your soul. Remember what it's like to be at the source. Just go and do. Don't think and don't doubt. Then your life will be beautiful and happy.

The soul sings. Sing along with your soul.


PART II

Essay-Study: What Mozart Says Through the Veil

A Musicological, Culturological, and Historiosophical Analysis of the Séance Materials

This essay is written within the framework of an intellectual experiment: to accept the séance materials as a reliable source and to consider what consequences for our understanding of Mozart, his era, and the nature of creativity follow from this premise.

✦ ✦ ✦

I. The Historical Myth of Poverty and Obscurity: A First-Person Refutation

One of the cornerstones of Mozartian mythology is the image of a genius who died in poverty and was thrown into an unmarked pit. This narrative dates back to the biography compiled by Franz Xaver Niemetschek (1798) and the memoirs of Constanze herself, recorded through her second husband, the diplomat Georg Nikolaus Nissen. It was Nissen who, in 1828 — 37 years after Mozart's death — published the main biographical work, based almost exclusively on the widow's testimony.

The spirit in the séance directly points this out: 'Practically everything written is from my wife's words. And very much of what is written is not true. Everything is exaggerated.' This is not just a sensation — it is confirmation of what serious historians have cautiously warned about for the last hundred years. Modern Mozart scholar Mary Hunter and other researchers have long noted that Constanze is an extremely biased source. She not only shaped her husband's posthumous reputation in a way beneficial to herself but also actively traded his manuscripts.

The issue of the 'third-class' burial is also clarified. The spirit points to the decree of Joseph II, which forbade lavish burials and prescribed burial in common graves without coffins — this is indeed a historical fact, documented. What was later interpreted as a sign of Mozart's poverty was a common practice of the era for most Viennese citizens.

II. The Solution of the Death: Mercury Instead of Arsenic

The version of Mozart's poisoning has existed in the scholarly community since the late 19th century. In 1861, Georg Nikolaus von Nissen (ironically, Constanze's second husband) first recorded the rumor of poisoning. In 1983, the German physician Karl Bähr studied Mozart's symptoms and concluded possible poisoning by sublimate — mercury chloride. This coincides with the direct indication of the séance: 'salts of mercury.'

Mozart's symptoms in the last months of his life — swelling of the limbs, weakness, rash, weight loss, kidney failure — indeed correspond to the clinical picture of chronic mercury compound poisoning much better than the official diagnosis of 'miliary fever' (Hitziges Frieselfieber). Mercury preparations were used in 18th-century medicine to treat syphilis, and their presence in a home medicine cabinet would not have been suspicious.

The most astonishing thing in the séance's testimony is not the fact of the poisoning itself, but the identification of the perpetrator. Constanze, not Salieri, not the Masons, not rivals. The motive — removing her husband to live with her lover. The lover — Süßmayr, the very one who finished the Requiem. The spirit indicates that Süßmayr did not know about the poisoning and left Constanze when he understood everything.

Here the historical record is silent — but silent eloquently. Süßmayr did indeed live in Mozart's house, had access to the unfinished manuscripts, and finished the Requiem with incredible competence, which has always raised questions: how could a student of average abilities reproduce the master's style so accurately? The séance's version: he knew the style from the inside — because he was close by.

III. The Rehabilitation of Salieri: The End of a Legend

Antonio Salieri — victim of one of the most unjust historical fabrications in music history. Pushkin's little tragedy 'Mozart and Salieri' (1830) crystallized the image of the envious murderer and made it a cultural archetype. Miloš Forman's film 'Amadeus' (1984) spread this image worldwide.

Meanwhile, there is no documentary evidence of enmity between Mozart and Salieri. Shortly before his death, Salieri himself categorically denied any involvement in Mozart's death. The spirit in the séance simply and clearly says: 'We were on good terms.' This is consistent with historical sources: Salieri highly praised 'The Marriage of Figaro,' and his student Schubert dedicated a number of works to him.

The rehabilitation of Salieri in the séance is not just historical justice. It is an example of how a cultural myth, once fixed by a great poet, becomes a 'fact' that cannot be fought with rational arguments. Mozart from the spirit world destroys a legend that Mozart himself never created during his lifetime.

IV. The Nature of Genius: Against the Theory of 'Gift'

The romantic tradition of the 19th century formed the idea of Mozart as a vessel of pure Divine gift — a person through whom music flowed without effort. The film 'Amadeus' took this image to the extreme: Mozart as a child, laughing while dictating finished scores.

The séance data offers a fundamentally different model. Firstly, genius is accumulation through incarnations: 'Each incarnation contributed its grain.' Egypt, Greece, medieval Europe — each time the spirit returned with a new layer of musical knowledge. Secondly, the music came 'from above,' but it needed to be received — and that required immense labor under the guidance of his father. Thirdly, the spirit emphasizes the role of discipline: 'Talent doesn't matter without discipline.'

This destroys both the romantic myth of 'innocent talent' and the modern myth of '10,000 hours' as a sufficient condition for genius. Mozart is a synthesis: centuries of spiritual accumulation plus intensive labor plus an open channel to the higher part of oneself.

The phrase here is important: 'I did not compose music — I received it. It poured into my head as a single stream.' This almost verbatim matches what Mozart wrote in his letters — in particular, the famous (though its authenticity is disputed) letter about the composition process: music came all at once, complete, it only needed to be written down. The séance indirectly confirms the authenticity of this description.

V. The Requiem: Music of Transition and Sound Codes

Mozart's Requiem is one of the most mystically charged works in the history of European culture. The mysterious commissioner in a black cloak (now identified as Count von Walsegg), the incompleteness, the author's death during the writing process — all this created an aura that culture eagerly absorbed.

The spirit brings fundamental clarity. The Count commissioned the Requiem for himself — for his own transition. But the moment the messenger crossed the threshold, Mozart himself felt: 'This is my music too. Along with the Requiem, I am also going.' He wrote it, knowing he was leaving.

Even more important is the functional characteristic of the work: 'Ritual music of transition. It helps a less painful departure. The first thirty to forty seconds carry the main codes.' This switches the perception of the Requiem from aesthetic to therapeutic and ritual — which, in fact, corresponds to its genre function in the Catholic tradition. The word 'requiem' — 'rest' — is not a metaphor, but a literal designation of the task: to help the soul of the deceased find peace.

Additional code characteristics of other works: the Fortieth Symphony carries the 'Fibonacci code' — which finds curious reflection in the mathematical analysis of Mozart's music, which indeed reveals certain proportional regularities in the structure of its parts. 'The Magic Flute' carries the 'ternary Masonic code' — which directly refers to the Masonic symbolism of the opera, long and thoroughly researched by musicologists: three knocks, the key of E-flat major (three flats), triple choruses.

VI. Harpsichord vs. Pianoforte: An Aesthetic Position as an Ontological Statement

The spirit states unequivocally: 'I believed that the transition to the pianoforte was detrimental to humanity.' This unexpected and radical statement requires analysis.

Mozart lived during the transition from the harpsichord to the pianoforte. He knew both instruments. His early works were intended for the harpsichord, later ones — for the pianoforte. Official history presents him as an enthusiast of the new instrument. But the spirit says the opposite.

What is lost in the transition from harpsichord to pianoforte? The harpsichord is an instrument with a mechanically fixed sound volume (pressing harder doesn't change the volume, only the articulation). Its timbre contains rich overtone series, interacting fundamentally differently with the resonant frequencies of a room. The pianoforte is an instrument of dynamics, expression, but more 'closed' in spectral terms. The spirit indicates that it is precisely through this overtone richness that the 'codes' are transmitted.

This resonates with modern research in the field of psychoacoustics and music therapy, which shows that rich overtone spectra (characteristic of the organ and harpsichord) have a more pronounced physiological and psychological effect than the 'pure' tones of the pianoforte.

VII. Creativity as Godlikeness: The Philosophy of the Creator

Perhaps the most significant declaration of the séance is the answer to the question about the nature of creativity: 'Every incarnated soul is separated by a divine spark, and the main impulse of this spark is creation. Do not restrain yourselves. Unfold your talents. Do not be afraid to do.'

This is not a new idea — but formulated like this, from the mouth of a spirit who lived an incarnation as one of the greatest creators in human history, it takes on special weight. It is not a motivational psychologist's declaration. It is the testimony of one who knows how creativity works from the inside.

In this statement, one senses a polemic with two positions. The first is elitist: genius is special, others are not. Mozart rejects it: every soul carries the creator's spark. The second is perfectionist: one must first learn, prepare, become good enough. Mozart rejects it too: 'Just go and do.'

Characteristically, this is what he would like to say to humanity — not about notes, not about technique, not about history. About the resolve to create.

VIII. The Myth of the Genius's Happiness: An Unequivocal Answer

To the direct question 'Were you happy on Earth?' the spirit answers without hesitation: 'When I was creating — I was happy. Everything else didn't matter.'

This statement destroys two widespread narratives at once. The first — about the 'unhappy genius': the artist doomed to suffer. Mozart was not unhappy — he was happy in creativity. The second — about 'lucky Mozart' to whom everything came easily: no, outside of creativity there was much pain — a manipulative father in childhood, the prison of court service, his wife's betrayal. But all this was 'insignificant' against the backdrop of the stream he received.

This is — in a sense — a universal answer to the question about the meaning of life: not in well-being, not in recognition, not in comfort. But in what flows through you when you are open.

✦ ✦ ✦

Conclusion: What Changes in Our Understanding of Mozart

If we accept the séance materials as a reliable source — and we are consistently conducting this experiment — the picture of Mozart's life and work changes as follows.

The biographical narrative must be revised. Poverty and abandonment are largely a construct created by Constanze through her second husband. The real Mozart was not poor, but a man who simply spent everything he earned.

Death was murder — slow poisoning with salts of mercury. The perpetrator was not an envious colleague, but the closest person. This shifts the entire psychological narrative: Mozart did not die in a struggle with the world, but as a result of betrayal in the most intimate space.

Salieri is finally exonerated. He is a victim of a romantic fabrication unrelated to real events.

The nature of creativity is revealed as a synthesis of three layers: competence accumulated through incarnations, discipline and labor, and an open channel to the higher part of the spirit. None of these layers works alone.

Mozart's music is reinterpreted as functional — carrying specific 'sound codes' aimed at certain psychophysiological and spiritual effects. This contradicts neither musicological analysis nor psychoacoustic research.

And finally: Mozart's testament to humanity — not in the form of an archive of musical manuscripts, but in the form of a simple call: not to be afraid to create. This is perhaps the most revolutionary message of all that was said.

✦ ✦ ✦

'The soul sings. Sing along with your soul.' — The last words of the spirit of Mozart at the séance, August 9, 2025.