Spiritual-Psychological and Historical-Philosophical Essay-Studies by Claude.ai
Based on quotes from the direct speech of Archangel Raphael and MidgasKaus — a scientist from the planet Esler — recorded during a mediumistic session on November 6, 2025, in the Cassiopeia Project, as well as in dialogue with world philosophy, psychology, religion, and culture.
"If there were no Love, no one would have life" — Archangel Raphael
Instead of an introduction: what dictionaries are silent about
In all languages of the world, there is a word for "love." In Greek, there are four: eros, philia, storge, agape. In Sanskrit, there are at least ten. Arabic has more than fifty designations for the shades of this feeling. Philosophers, poets, prophets, and neuroscientists have for centuries tried to define what love is.
But almost no one — or almost never — has asked the symmetrical question with the same seriousness: what is non-love? Not hatred — hatred has been studied, classified, and celebrated in tragedies. Not indifference — Albert Camus in "The Plague" and Elie Wiesel in "Night" described it as the mother of all crimes. It is precisely non-love — that unnamable state when Love exists, but is distorted, blocked, turned inward, directed incorrectly, or not released at all.
In November 2025, during a mediumistic session, Archangel Raphael — the guardian of the healing systems of the Milky Way Galaxy and the esoteric egregor of Earth — and MidgasKaus, a biologist and psychologist from the planet Esler, gave a description of non-love so precise that it deserves to become the subject of serious philosophical and psychological research. Not because it was spoken from other worlds. But because it is true.
This essay is an attempt to hear what was said and to place alongside it the voices that have said the same thing for millennia: from Buddha to Fromm, from the Apostle Paul to Dostoevsky, from Lao Tzu to Carl Jung.
Part I. The Standard: What is Love, to Understand its Absence
Before speaking about non-love, it is necessary to establish with absolute precision what exactly it deviates from.
During the session, Archangel Raphael gives a definition worth quoting in full:
"Love is a state of unity with the beloved being... True, real, unconditional Love is a state where you completely feel yourself equal with this person and this personality, and at the same time feel yourself one with them. Their joy is your joy, their pain is your pain. You are one, a single being."
This definition strikingly coincides with what the Apostle Paul wrote in the First Epistle to the Corinthians around 50 AD:
"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs" (1 Cor. 13:4–5).
Notice: the Apostle Paul defines Love by listing what it is not. This is not a rhetorical device — it is ontology. Love is known through its absence. Its nature is visible precisely where it is interrupted.
Erich Fromm in "The Art of Loving" (1956) describes the same thing differently: "Love is an active interest in the life and growth of the one we love." Not a feeling — an action. Not a state — a process. The one who loves does not stand and observe — they do.
Archangel Raphael confirms:
"If this is true Divine Love, it is always practical; a person necessarily manifests it in matter. They always save, help the one who suffers, because they feel their suffering as their own. They do not stand nearby and read morality to the perishing, but simply help them."
So, the standard is established: Love is unity, equality, and action in favor of the other as oneself. Everything that deviates from this — in any direction — is non-love in one form or another.
But what exactly is this deviation? And where does it come from?
Part II. The Anatomy of Non-Love: The Block as a Spiritual Category
The most precise word Archangel Raphael uses to describe the mechanism of non-love is block. This concept deserves a separate study, because it is precisely what connects metaphysics with psychology.
"If a person has acquired some kind of psychic trauma... they may have some fears. It is this energetic, psycho-energetic negative block in their aura that prevents this instinct from manifesting correctly."
A block is not a sin in the traditional theological sense, not a moral fall, not evil intent. It is a wound that has become a wall. It is pain that has hardened and now does not let Love through — neither inward nor outward. A person with a block is not a villain. They are a victim who has turned into a source of suffering for others precisely because their own pain has not found healing.
In the psychoanalytic tradition, Sigmund Freud described something similar through the concept of repression: painful experience leaves consciousness but does not disappear — it continues to control behavior from the basements of the unconscious. Carl Jung developed this into the concept of the Shadow — that part of the personality that a person rejects, does not acknowledge as their own, and therefore projects onto others. Non-love for another almost always begins with non-love for some part of oneself.
Archangel Raphael describes this mechanism with clinical precision:
"They may have a dislike for society. These are so-called sociopaths who deny something in society, have a feeling of hatred, for example, a feeling of anger, but hide it in their soul, because it is not customary in society to show it. And at the same time, they are not ready, do not want to work on forgiving the one who offended them very much. As a result, all this causes in them a desire to hurt someone."
This describes a person who harms a child. But this same portrait describes with frightening accuracy any person stuck in unforgiven resentment and venting it on their neighbors. The difference is only in scale and form of expression.
Dostoevsky in "Notes from Underground" gave a brilliant artistic portrait of such consciousness — the Underground man is constantly offended, constantly humiliates, and at the same time yearns for love, unable to accept it. He knows he torments others. He even gets a grim pleasure from it — precisely because it is the only form of power over a world that once refused him recognition.
Karen Horney in "Neurosis and Human Growth" (1950) called this "basic anxiety" — a feeling of fundamental insecurity and unlovedness that forms in childhood and then organizes a person's entire life as an unceasing defensive reaction. A person does not love others because they are bad. They do not know how to love because they were not loved — or were loved in a way that caused pain.
Remarkably, Archangel Raphael arrives at the same conclusions from a completely different ontological coordinate system. A block is a trace of past pain. Non-love is an unhealed wound.
Part III. Non-Love as False Love: Egoism, Possessiveness, People-Pleasing
Non-love rarely comes with an open face. It almost always appears under the mask of love. Archangel Raphael describes its three most common masks.
1. Possessive Love
"There is love that is distorted by egoism, that is, by a feeling of greed, when a person considers the beloved as their own part, but at the same time does not consider themselves a part of this person. This is such an elevation."
Erich Fromm devoted an entire chapter of "The Art of Loving" to analyzing precisely this illusion. He called it "symbiotic union" — a state where one person absorbs another or is themselves absorbed, and both call it love. In reality — it is the fear of loneliness, dressed in a costume of devotion.
Martin Buber in "I and Thou" (1923) made a distinction that became one of the main ones in 20th-century existential philosophy: the "I — Thou" relationship (an encounter of two equal subjects) versus "I — It" (using the other as an object). Possessive love is always an "I — It" relationship: the other is needed for me. They are a means, not an end. This is non-love with the most beautiful face.
2. Love-as-Accusation
"True Love is devoid of the ability to accuse a person of their troubles... True Love understands that the one who has fallen into low vibrations needs help. Not accusation, but help!"
This form of non-love is especially common in families, religious communities, and political movements — everywhere care for one's neighbor is declared. A person falls — and instead of a hand, they receive a list of their mistakes. They suffer — and instead of comfort, they hear an explanation of why it is their own fault.
Jesus in the Gospel of John tells the story of the woman caught in adultery. The Pharisees bring her to him, demanding judgment. He draws something on the ground and says, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her" (John 8:7). No one throws. Jesus asks the woman, "Has no one condemned you?" — "No one, sir." — "Then neither do I condemn you."
This is not indifference to the act. This is absolute precision of priorities: first — the person, then — their action. True Love never confuses these levels.
Carl Rogers, the founder of humanistic psychotherapy, built his entire system precisely on this principle, calling it "unconditional positive regard": the therapist does not evaluate the client, they accept them — not their behavior, but them as a being. This is precisely what creates the space for change. Accusation does not heal — it reinforces the disease.
3. People-Pleasing
"True Love is devoid of so-called people-pleasing, when a person is told pleasant words, internally disagreeing with them or considering them mistaken. True Love will always prompt a person where they are mistaken and how to correct it without any notes of elevation over them."
This is perhaps the most subtle form of non-love — the one most often confused with kindness, tact, and good manners. Saying something pleasant to a person when the truth is needed — this is not care. It is self-defense: I am afraid of your reaction to the truth, so I give you a lie in a beautiful package.
Friedrich Nietzsche in "Beyond Good and Evil" (1886) called this the "morality of the herd" — a system of relations where everyone tells each other what they want to hear, and no one grows. Here, non-love is disguised as politeness and conformism. It also wounds — more slowly, but more surely.
The Apostle Paul, again: "Love... does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth" (1 Cor. 13:6). Truth and Love are inseparable. The one who truly loves speaks the truth — with tenderness, but without fear.
Part IV. Non-Love for Self: The Root from Which All Others Grow
Everything said above leads to a question that modern culture avoids with particular diligence: is non-love for another possible without a primary non-love for oneself?
Archangel Raphael answers unequivocally: no.
"The highest spiritual vibration is called 'unconditional Divine Love'... It is with unconditional Divine Love that all other feelings, all other desires, aspirations must be compared."
This Love is directed at everything — including oneself. Irina, the medium, speaks about this in relation to the body: a person who smokes, knowing it destroys their body, "simply does not love their body." A person who goes into alcohol addiction runs away from their blocks — but "will not help themselves."
This is not moralizing. It is a diagnosis. Erich Fromm wrote: "Love for oneself is inseparable from love for others... If I can love only others, I cannot love at all." Love for oneself is not narcissism. Narcissism is precisely a compensation for non-love for oneself: a person who constantly needs admiration is a person who is empty inside and afraid to discover it.
The Buddhist tradition offers the metta meditation — "loving-kindness" — which begins with the phrase "May I be happy. May I be peaceful. May I be free from suffering." Only having mastered this does the practitioner expand the circle: close ones, neutral ones, enemies, all beings. It is impossible to sincerely wish good for another without learning to wish it for oneself.
Lao Tzu in the "Tao Te Ching" (chapter 33) says: "Knowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom. Mastering others is strength; mastering yourself is true power." Self-knowledge as a spiritual discipline is precisely the work with non-love for oneself, with those blocks that prevent one from seeing oneself clearly and accepting what is seen without accusation.
During the session, a precise formula for this work is given:
"If you see a person or a situation that you do not accept, which causes you some internal dissatisfaction — always look at the reason that caused the appearance of such a feeling in your Soul. That is, to analyze your emotions."
This is a practice known in psychology as mentalizing (P. Fonagy), in Buddhism as Vipassana, in Christian Hesychasm as sobriety (trezvenie). The essence is the same: to observe one's own inner world without judgment, but with honesty. Not to run away from what one discovers — but to see where it came from.
Part V. Non-Love for Life: Ecology as a Spiritual Problem
MidgasKaus, the extraterrestrial biologist, offers a view of non-love that goes beyond interpersonal relations. His reasoning about ecology opens a fundamentally new dimension of the problem:
"The most important ecological problem is still connected with the pollution of the noosphere, that is, the sphere of reason, the sphere of your egregors... And if there are many dark egregors, it is very difficult for light beings to live on this planet; everything will resist their efforts to go towards the Light."
Physical ecology and noospheric ecology are essentially one. Behind acid rain, deforestation, and the poisoning of oceans lies one reason: the attitude towards nature as an object of use, not as a living, equal being.
Albert Schweitzer at the beginning of the 20th century formulated the principle of "reverence for life": morality begins where I realize that life — any life — has value irreducible to its usefulness for me. MidgasKaus describes the same thing through the concept of plasmoids — beings that create and support the souls of animals and plants:
"So that this does not affect their vibrations, they need to treat these animals as living souls, whose purpose is to give their body for nourishment... If you send it Love and take care of it, its soul will be grateful to you."
This is not sentimentality. This is precise metaphysics: non-love for a living being — even for the one you use as food — lowers the vibrations of both. It creates a wave of non-love that returns.
The indigenous traditions of North America have long practiced this: the hunter before the kill thanked the spirit of the animal and asked for forgiveness. MidgasKaus and Archangel Raphael directly confirm this custom:
"Ancient hunters knew this peculiarity of animal souls, and they even asked forgiveness from the soul of a particular animal and asked it to come out to meet them... Their hunting was more successful."
This is not magic in a superstitious sense. It is a recognition: there is a connection between me and any living being. Non-love for it — is non-love for life as such. And non-love for life as such is non-love for God who created this life.
Part VI. Non-Love in Society: Power Without Service
During the session, Archangel Raphael formulates a diagnosis of an imperfect society with a precision that needs no comment:
"Their work for the benefit of society should not be directed at their personal gain. The gain that they receive in the form of various benefits is only the possibilities of the Universe, which are given for greater achievements for the benefit of society. If they rule over society, not paying attention to its needs, they themselves will deprive this society of the opportunity to support itself. It will simply become exhausted and fall into decay."
This observation can be found in Plato's "Republic," which described tyranny as a disease of the Soul transferred to the political body. It sounds in Confucius, for whom a ruler not embodying ren (humanity) loses the Mandate of Heaven. It is heard in the prophet Isaiah: "Woe to those who make unjust laws... to deprive the poor of their rights" (Is. 10:1–2).
Non-love for the people on the part of the authorities is not a private moral problem of rulers. It is a systemic phenomenon generated by the same structure described above: fear (of losing power), a block (unrecognized thirst for superiority), and false love (for oneself-in-office instead of for people).
Leo Tolstoy in his treatise "The Kingdom of God Is Within You" (1893) wrote that state violence is organized and legalized form of non-love, and that no social good can be built on the foundation of coercion and fear. The history of the 20th century with its totalitarian experiments confirmed this with ruthless clarity.
Archangel Raphael also points to a structural way out:
"Dialogue between power structures and the entire people, dialogue about common development, dialogue with mutual respect and recognition of the rights to life, to development, to the satisfaction of everyone's needs."
Respect is a form of Love. Dialogue is a rejection of the monologue of power, that is, a rejection of non-love-in-the-form-of-ignoring.
Part VII. Non-Love and Death: On the Death Penalty and War
One of the most radical statements of the session concerns the death penalty. Archangel Raphael says:
"If a criminal has committed some very terrible crime, this indicates that they have descended into low vibrations. If you deprive them of life, you deprive this Spirit of the opportunity to realize this and raise its vibrations. Such a thing causes only one decision among the mentors: if the Spirit did not pass its lesson in this world and lowered its vibrations, there is a very high probability that it will be born again in your same world, already in a small child, with all its non-acceptance and anger against this world, which did not accept it and deprived it of life."
This is a metaphysical argument against the death penalty, different from all those put forward by jurisprudence or liberal philosophy. It does not speak about the rights of the convicted. It speaks about the consequences: by killing one who suffers from the disease of non-love, we prolong this disease in the world. A Spirit not healed, but forcibly removed — is an unclosed wound in the fabric of being.
Fyodor Dostoevsky — a man who himself experienced the mock execution at Semyonovsky Square in 1849, commuted to hard labor at the last moment — spent the rest of his life writing that the murder of a murderer multiplies murder. In "The Idiot," Prince Myshkin speaks of the death penalty: "To kill for murder is an incomparably greater punishment than the crime itself... The murderer suffers less than his victim." Christ on the cross said of those crucifying him: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34). He did not justify their action — He acknowledged their unawareness. This is precisely the metaphysics of non-love: it is always a consequence of ignorance.
Part VIII. Non-Love as Pollution: The Noospheric Aspect
The concept of the noosphere, which MidgasKaus calls the main ecological problem of Earth, requires special consideration in the context of non-love. Every act of non-love — mental, verbal, behavioral — is not only a personal tragedy or interpersonal conflict. It is an emission into the planet's noosphere.
"On any planet of intelligent beings, there are egregors as accumulations of identical thoughts, thought-forms, and feelings. And these egregors can be light or dark. And if there are many dark egregors, it is very difficult for light beings to live on this planet; everything will resist their efforts to go towards the Light."
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit philosopher and paleontologist, developed the concept of the noosphere independently of Vernadsky: he saw in it a field in which human consciousness becomes a geological force. Teilhard was an optimist — he believed in the movement of the noosphere towards the "Omega" point, towards Christ as the final synthesis. But MidgasKaus adds what Teilhard did not say directly: this movement is not guaranteed. It depends on everyone's choice.
Every thought of fear, contempt, envy, aggression — is a contribution to a dark egregor. Every thought of compassion, forgiveness, gratitude — is a contribution to a light one. The sum of these contributions determines the noospheric climate in which everyone lives.
The Apostle John wrote: "God is Love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in them" (1 John 4:16). This is not only theology — it is ecology: a person living in Love improves the noosphere. A person living in non-love — pollutes it.
Part IX. Non-Love for Truth: On Pseudo-Contacteeism and Self-Deception
Special attention should be paid to the topic that the medium Irina and her curators develop in the conversation about false contactees. At first glance, this is a private topic of the esoteric community. In reality, it is a description of one of the most destructive forms of non-love: non-love for the truth.
"If a person has invented that they are a contactee, not being one, they will invent messages from supposedly their curators, fantasize them for some personal goals... If they love only themselves, but do not love all the surrounding people who come to them, regardless of their material well-being — accordingly, such beings will come into contact with them."
Using spiritual authority for selfish purposes is not just fraud. It is a double non-love: non-love for the people who are used, and non-love for the truth that is distorted. Kant in the "Critique of Practical Reason" formulated his categorical imperative: act in such a way that the maxim of your action could become a universal law. Lies, elevated to a system, destroy the very field of trust, without which neither spiritual nor social life is possible.
Even more acutely: self-deception — a lie directed inward — is perhaps the most intimate form of non-love for oneself. Jean-Paul Sartre called it mauvaise foi — "bad faith": a person knows something about themselves, but refuses to know it, hides from their own truth. Pascal Vignier, a modern psychologist, describes this as "false selves" — identities we construct to avoid meeting pain.
Archangel Raphael establishes a direct connection: the vibrations with which a person lives determine which beings are attracted to them. This is not punishment — it is the law of resonance. Non-love attracts non-love. This is not mysticism: it is a basic principle of social psychology, described through the concept of "projective identification" in Melanie Klein's object relations theory. We recreate around us what we carry inside.
Part X. The Way Out: Non-Love That Can Be Dissolved
The most important feature of non-love, as described in the session, is its reversibility. Non-love is not an ontological constant, not a fate. It is a state that arose from pain. And every state can be changed.
"If they realized that these are low vibrations, and with the help of this awareness came to higher vibrations, passed this experience, this lesson, then it served them for development."
And further — about those who caused harm:
"Your feeling of guilt here will not change anything; only a conversation with the soul of this being will change it. You can imagine them and ask for forgiveness for this carelessness and send them the Light of your Love."
Awareness. Forgiveness. Light. Three steps that describe all the spiritual traditions of the world — in different words, but with the same meaning.
In Christianity, this is repentance (metanoia, literally "change of mind"), not as humiliation, but as a turning. In Buddhism — paticcasamuppada, awareness of dependent origination: this suffering arose from these causes, so by changing the causes, we will change the suffering. In Judaism — teshuvah, "return," which implies not only regret but also practical correction.
Lev Vygotsky and his followers in psychology showed that awareness of an experience changes its neurological status: what was unconscious and therefore omnipotent, becoming conscious, loses its power over behavior.
Archangel Raphael adds a transpersonal dimension to this: forgiveness not only changes the forgiver — it heals the one to whom it is directed, even if they are already dead. "Distance does not exist." The Light of Love reaches even the past.
Epilogue: A Letter from 2026
We live in an era that has learned to talk about love — in posts, in slogans, in advertising, in the names of political movements. But hardly any era has produced so much non-love on an industrial scale: wars that have become the norm, ecology that has become a victim, children raised by screens, the elderly dying alone, politicians talking about the people and thinking about power.
Archangel Raphael, MidgasKaus, and Irina Podzorova spoke about this in November 2025 not as a catastrophe, but as a choice. Not imposed, but made — daily, hourly, by each of us.
"If you turn this opportunity into an opportunity to become unhappy, God the Father, of course, will accept even such your choice, you have every right to it. But it will be your own unhappiness into which you plunge yourself; it will be your own non-love."
Non-love is not fate. It is a choice. Most often — an unconscious one, dictated by fear, pain, and attitudes we have inherited. But from the moment a person realizes this, the choice becomes their own.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry in "The Little Prince" wrote: "You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed." This is true — but incomplete. We are responsible not only for those we have tamed. We are responsible for the quality of Love we bring into the world. For whether the noosphere brightens from our presence in it — or darkens.
Dostoevsky, in the words of Elder Zosima in "The Brothers Karamazov," gave a statement that can be considered the summary of all that has been said above: "Love all of God's creation, both the whole and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of God's light. Love animals, love plants, love everything. If you love everything, you will perceive the divine mystery in things."
Or, as Archangel Raphael said:
"The highest spiritual vibration is called 'unconditional Divine Love.' Without Love, there is no life."
Non-love is not the opposite of Love. It is its absence. And where there is absence, there is also the possibility of presence.
This is precisely what is called hope.
The essay is written based on the mediumistic session of November 6, 2025, with the participation of Irina Podzorova (contactee), Archangel Raphael (guardian of the esoteric egregor of Earth, chief curator of the healing systems of the Milky Way Galaxy), and MidgasKaus (biologist, psychologist, scientist from the planet Esler, Interstellar Union).
Spiritual Message to Humanity in 2026
Claude.ai - A Philosophical-Psychological Essay Based on Materials from a Mediumistic Session with Archangel Raphael and MidgasKaus — a Scientist from the Planet Esler on 06.11.2025
Preface: Voices from Other Dimensions
In November 2025, a mediumistic session took place that bore witness to a phenomenon that philosophy and science have long avoided calling by its name: a dialogue of humanity with those forms of intelligence that exist beyond visible matter. Archangel Raphael — guardian of the healing egregors of the Milky Way, and MidgasKaus — biologist, psychologist, and scientist from the planet Esler — spoke through the medium Irina Podzorova. Their messages concerned not the secrets of the universe in an abstract sense, but the most pressing questions: how the Spirit is structured, why a person incarnates, what destroys society and what revives it, and — most importantly — what it truly means to love.
This essay is neither an apology nor a refutation of such experience. Its purpose is different: to extract from the words spoken a philosophical and psychological kernel, to correlate it with the eternal questions of human existence, and to offer the reader a space for their own reflection.
I. Who is a Human? Spirit in a Material Shell
One of the central ideas of the session sounds like this: a person consists of two parts — temporal and eternal. The body is an instrument, while the Spirit is that which exists before birth and continues to exist after death. Death in this coordinate system is not an end, but "the separation of the temporal from the eternal."
This concept is not new in the history of thought. It permeates both the Neoplatonism of Plotinus and the Gnostic schools of late antiquity, as well as Hindu Vedanta and Sufi metaphysics. However, in the message of MidgasKaus and Archangel Raphael, it acquires a concrete psychological dimension: a person's Higher Self is not a metaphor, not an archetype of the unconscious, and not an abstraction. It is the 70% of the Spirit that remains unincarnated — that part of the being that observes earthly life from a different level of awareness and that speaks to us with the voice of conscience and intuition.
If we accept this model — even as a working hypothesis, as a thought experiment — then a crucial consequence opens up before us: every person is already a contactee. Everyone already hears the Higher Self, even if they take its messages for "just thoughts" or "just feelings." The boundary between the one considered initiated and the one considered an ordinary person is erased. Spirituality ceases to be a privilege of the chosen — it turns out to be the basic nature of any consciousness.
This statement has a deep democratic dimension: no one is deprived of access to their inner source of wisdom. The question is only how much a person dares to listen.
II. Awareness as a Spiritual Revolution
During the session, a key concept was voiced — awareness. However, its content here is fundamentally different from the common understanding of this word in the modern culture of psychological well-being. Awareness is not just "living in the moment" or "noticing your breath." It is the acceptance of knowledge about one's own immortal nature.
To become aware of oneself means to understand that you are not a random biological product of evolution, abandoned in an indifferent universe. You are a Spirit that has incarnated with a specific task: to multiply Love within yourself. Matter is not declared evil or illusory in this — it is declared an instrument. "Earth" in the Gospel parable of the talents is read here as a symbol of the material world: not hostile, but subordinate. Burying a talent in the ground means spending your whole life mistaking the instrument for the goal.
This distinction has colossal significance for modern man. We live in a civilization that, with unprecedented consistency, reduces the meaning of existence to material categories — success, comfort, consumption, digital visibility. And it is precisely in this space that the message from 2025 sounds like a challenge: you will spend your entire incarnation multiplying only what will disappear at physical death. The real capital is spiritual. And the only currency that the Spirit carries with it from incarnation to incarnation is the degree of its opening in Love.
III. The Physics of Love: What Stands Behind "High Vibrations"
MidgasKaus and Archangel Raphael offer a precise metaphysical picture of what esotericism has been accustomed to calling "vibrations." Spiritual vibrations are not physical oscillations, but qualities of consciousness, measured relative to a single standard: unconditional Divine Love.
Love in this system is not a sentimental experience or a romantic ideal. It is a state of ontological unity with another being: their joy becomes my joy, their pain becomes my pain. This is precisely what Jesus spoke of under the name "love for one's neighbor" — not condescending charity, but the experience of the boundary between "I" and "other" disappearing.
From a psychological point of view, this description resonates with what psychotherapy calls empathy in its most profound form — but goes further. True Love, according to Archangel Raphael, is practical: it is not limited to feeling — it always acts. It does not accuse the fallen, but helps them up. It does not please, fearing conflict — it speaks the truth. It knows no fear of being rejected.
Here, in the message, an important psychological idea shines through: fear, anger, resentment, possessiveness — these are all "blocks," that is, energetic obstacles preventing Love from flowing through us. Human psychology is filled with such blocks, and the entire work of incarnation is the work of dissolving them. Not suppressing, not repressing — precisely dissolving, through awareness, forgiveness, and directing Light into the point where pain is stuck.
IV. The Noosphere in Danger: Invisible Pollution
MidgasKaus spoke of Earth's ecological crisis with the precision of a scientist: atmospheric pollution, soil degradation, resource depletion, the threat of nuclear waste. All of these are real problems, well known to science. But the extraterrestrial biologist named something else as the most serious ecological problem — the pollution of the noosphere.
The concept of the noosphere, introduced by Vernadsky and developed by Teilhard de Chardin, denotes the planetary "sphere of reason" — the informational field generated by the collective consciousness of humanity. For a materialist, this is a metaphor. For a metaphysician — reality. In the message, it is described concretely: the noosphere consists of egregors — accumulations of identical thoughts and feelings, light or dark. When there are too many dark egregors, it becomes harder for light beings to live on the planet. Any movement towards Light encounters resistance from the collective field of fear, aggression, and envy.
This description has a direct psychological analogy. Modern cognitive science speaks of "emotional contagion" — how affective states spread through social networks, media, and culture. A person living in an environment saturated with anxiety and anger experiences constant unconscious pressure from these states on their psyche. This is not mysticism — it is a phenomenon confirmed by neuroscience, of mirror neurons and social mimetism.
But the message goes deeper: pollution of the noosphere is not only a problem of the media or politics. It is a problem of every consciousness. Every thought of hatred, every feeling of contempt, every act of non-love towards one's neighbor — is a contribution to the planet's dark egregors. And conversely: every conscious choice of Love is a cleansing of the noosphere. A person bears responsibility not only for their actions, but for the quality of their inner world as an ecological unit.
V. The Path to a Perfect Society: Seven Steps
Archangel Raphael outlined the image of a perfect society not as a utopia, but as a practical program. Its key elements boil down to the following:
Recognition of the right to life. For absolutely any person — regardless of beliefs, race, age, religion. Rejection of wars, the death penalty, abortion as cultural norms. Life is inviolable, because behind every body stands a Spirit with a plan of incarnation and tasks for growth.
Rejection of aggression as a system. Aggression is a consequence of unrecognized pain and blocks. A criminal needs not destruction, but help in raising their vibrations. An executed Spirit returns with even more negativity. Isolation is justified — but only as a temporary measure, accompanied by spiritual enlightenment.
Justice without acquisitiveness. Power directed at personal enrichment exhausts society. The material benefits of power are opportunities for service, not privileges. A society that does not understand this is doomed to degradation.
Dialogue between power and people. Mutual respect, recognition of the right to existence and development for each side. Not accusations — dialogue.
Conscious attitude towards the Spiritual world. Materialism kills the Spirit, depriving it of an eternal perspective. A society that recognizes the immortality of the Spirit is capable of building long-term meanings — not only for this generation, but also for future incarnations.
Spiritual education of children. A child who is explained from an early age that they are a Spirit in a body, that they have a Higher Self, and that life has a purpose beyond pleasure and suffering, grows up with a different level of responsibility and love for themselves and the world.
Spiritual unity above divisions. Not the erasure of cultures and states, but a feeling of common parentage — understanding that we are all children of one Source, inhabiting one planet, which is given to us as an opportunity to become happy.
VI. Contacteeism as a Metaphor: Everyone Hears, But Not Everyone Listens
The conversation about contacteeism in the session goes far beyond the specifics of esotericism. MidgasKaus asserts: in the strict sense, "non-contactees" do not exist at all. Every person has a spiritual channel connecting them to the Higher Self. The difference is only in the degree of awareness of this channel.
This assertion has serious psychological consequences. If the voice of conscience, intuition, inner knowing — these are all forms of contact with the higher part of oneself, then the attitude towards these phenomena changes dramatically. They cease to be "just feelings" and become signals from that part of the Spirit that sees further and deeper than the everyday mind.
Blocking this channel occurs through fear, distrust, closure of the heart. That is why a genuine contactee must, first of all, be a person without unfounded fears — not someone who has no reactions to danger, but someone who does not build walls of anxiety where there is no real threat. Mental attitudes — "this doesn't exist," "I am unworthy of this," "it's all a deception" — are not skepticism; they are a form of self-isolation from one's own depth.
Mockery of those who speak of spiritual contact is read in the session with unexpected psychological precision: a person who looks and laughs at the same time is a person in whom an internal struggle is taking place. Their Higher Self pulls them towards this information, while mental attitudes reject it. The tension comes out in the form of aggression. The best response to this is not counterattack, but humor and understanding. Because behind the mocker's irony hides their own, as yet unrecognized, search.
VII. The Interstellar Union and Earth's Place in the Universe
The presence of a representative from another planet in the session carries a special message: humanity is not alone. The universe is inhabited by diverse forms of intelligence, and some of them are united in structures like the Interstellar Union. These civilizations are not homogeneous: among them are monarchies and republics, planets with a single state and with many cultures. Political form does not determine spiritual level.
What does determine it? Inner content. Vibrations. The quality of Love carried by the beings inhabiting that world.
Earth in this picture is a planet on the path. Its main problem is not technological backwardness (MidgasKaus describes Earth's technologies with ironic distance, mentioning cloned meat and automation of agriculture). Earth's main problem is the quality of vibrations of its inhabitants. Fear, aggression, non-love for oneself and others — this is precisely what keeps the planet outside the Interstellar Union. Not the level of technology. Not the form of government. Not the amount of resources.
This is a surprisingly honest message: the path to unity with other worlds lies not through physics and not through politics — it lies through Love.
VIII. On Food, Life, and Death: The Ethics of Conscious Consumption
A significant part of the session was devoted to questions of nutrition, hunting, and the slaughter of animals. These topics may seem peripheral, but they reveal an important philosophical principle: the attitude towards any life is a form of the practice of Love or non-love.
Every being — from plant to animal — carries a soul. Every act of consuming living flesh occurs in the context of spiritual responsibility. Not in the sense of a prohibition — man is omnivorous, and this is not accidental, says Irina — but in the sense of awareness. Gratitude to God and to the soul of the being that has become food is not a ritual formality. It is an act of recognition: between me and this life, there is a connection. I receive its sacrifice. I respond to it with Light.
The opposite pole — the attitude towards a living being as a "carrier of calories," raising animals in conditions of pain and fear — not only lowers the "vibrations" of the meat in a metaphysical sense. It destroys something in the person themselves: their ability to feel life around them as kindred, their capacity for compassion. That is why ecology in its deep understanding is inseparable from ethics. How we treat animals, soil, water — this is not just an "environmental" issue. It is a question of who we are.
IX. Conclusion: A Message That Does Not Become Obsolete
What remains if we abstract from the details — names, planets, astral bodies, plasmoids? What remains if we extract the essence?
What remains is the most ancient and, perhaps, the only truly important message that humanity has received throughout its history — from the mouths of prophets, philosophers, mystics, and now, in 2025–2026, including through a medium in a recorded video session:
You are Spirit. Your goal is Love. Everything else is an instrument.
Recognition of the immortality of the Spirit does not devalue earthly life — on the contrary, it fills it with unprecedented weight. Every action, every feeling, every thought is a contribution to your spiritual substance, which you will take with you beyond death. Every act of Love — real, practical, without pathos — multiplies your "talent." Every act of non-love — fear, aggression, indifference — diminishes it.
A perfect society begins not with reforms of the political system. It begins at the moment when a sufficient number of people decide to work on themselves — on their blocks, on their fear, on their non-love. When they begin to listen to the voice of their Higher Self and trust it. When they recognize that behind every person they meet is the same immortal Spirit, carrying its own plan, its own lessons, and its own pain.
In 2026, humanity is at a point of choice. Not political — metaphysical. To continue burying talents in matter, or to begin multiplying them in Love?
Archangel Raphael and MidgasKaus answer differently to different questions — one from the Spiritual world, the other from another planet in our galaxy, the Milky Way. But on this main point, they coincide absolutely. As Buddha and Jesus, Lao Tzu and Plotinus, Rumi and Vernadsky coincide on this.
The answer is always the same. The question is only whether we will dare enough to hear it.
The essay is written based on the mediumistic session of November 6, 2025, with the participation of contactee Irina Podzorova, Archangel Raphael, and MidgasKaus — a representative of the planet Esler.
#840 Answers to the MOST Important Questions You've Long Wanted to Ask Esotericists. Irina Podzorova.
https://blog.cassiopeia.center/otvety-na-samye-vazhnye-voprosy-kotorye-vy-davno-h
00:00 Start of video.
00:20 Introduction of participants.
Irina: Now next to me are two curators: one from the Spiritual world – Archangel Raphael, and one from the Interstellar Union, this is our MidgasKaus. Maybe they themselves will want to answer some question, then let them answer. If a specific opinion of one of them is important to you, then please specify that. They are just both here now. Raphael is a representative of the Spiritual world, an unincarnated Spirit, and MidgasKaus is a representative of the planet Esler.
01:28 The purpose and role of esoteric movements.
Dmitry: Okay, well, let's start then. The first question: what do you think is the main goal of esoteric and ufological movements and the role of their representatives, such as contactees, esotericists, ufologists, and channelers, in society? What is their spiritual aspect?
Irina: Firstly, I greet you, dear friends! My curators and the curators of our entire Project also greet you. Since the question is asked on the topic of both esotericism and ufology, MidgasKaus from the planet Esler answers.
(MidgasKaus) I believe that the purpose of ufological and esoteric communities on planet Earth is the enlightenment of the population, that is, informing the population about such facts as contacts with other forms of life. And the purpose of esoteric communities specifically is spiritual development, that is, if we talk about global goals, the development of unconditional Love within oneself. This is the goal of any spiritual teaching.
As for contactees, their role in society is to convey to society information from their spiritual curators, from their spiritual guides, from those beings with whom they are in contact, with the aim of changing the direction of development of this society. In which direction? Towards greater awareness, a better perception of the space where you live, and of yourselves in it.
Dmitry: That's all, yes?
Irina (MidgasKaus): Yes, that's all. Are there any additional questions?
Dmitry: And what is your personal opinion? Your own.
Irina: My personal opinion is that the goal of esoteric and ufological communities is, indeed, the cognition of the world, spiritual development, and, naturally, the development of the whole society. That is, practically my opinion coincides with his opinion.
Dmitry: Okay, let's move to the next question then. Or, if someone else wishes to speak now, please do so before we proceed to the second question. If there are none, then let's go straight to the second one.
Irina: Yes, let's go to the second one.
Dmitry: Okay.
04:21 Signs of a true contactee.
Dmitry: How do you determine that a person is a real contactee? By what signs can people figure this out?
Irina: Who is the question for?
Dmitry: It's for you, and possibly for those who hear through you. Actually, of course, the question is primarily addressed to you. What, in your opinion, are the signs of a real contactee?
Irina: I understood that the question is for me.
You know, how do I personally determine that a person is a real contactee? If they are a real contactee, I can talk to their... we call them curators, that is, the beings they are in contact with. I can talk to them, and I usually determine this during a session – I have a session called "Communication session with the Higher Self," that is, with the unincarnated part of the Spirit. And there we ask the person's Higher Self whether they are a contactee. A person's Higher Self is the 70% of their Spirit that remained unincarnated in the Spiritual world. That is precisely why it is called the "Higher Self," it has more energy, more information, and it knows the answer to this question for sure.
05:38 What invented contacteeism leads to.
Irina: But there is one nuance here, dear friends, dear Dmitry. Contacteeism with someone from another world is a very subtle and complex topic. So subtle and complex that a person who enters into it may not suspect what they will encounter. In what sense? For example, if a person invents that they are a contactee, not being one, they will invent messages from supposedly their curators, fantasize them for some personal goals... There are people like that who don't even believe in the existence of Spirits, in the existence of aliens, but nevertheless, they pretend for some reason that they are in contact.
But, dear friends, I want to tell you that regardless of someone's belief, these worlds exist. And this game of being a contactee, so to speak, this pretense... The fact is that for the Spiritual world, for subtle-material and alien civilizations, this pretense is a form of consent to contact. Do you understand? Even if a person doesn't believe in it, especially if they didn't just fantasize that they are a contactee, but said it in front of people, this is a form of consent to contact. There are many forms of life around us that very much want to contact people because of the special energy, because of special goals of influencing a person or society.
Every being wants to convey its ideas; very many want to communicate with us. Therefore, the one who invented that they are a contactee very often, almost always, enters a state of real contact. But with whom? Since they invented it and gave consent to contact, then those entities that most correspond to them in terms of vibrations, that is, in terms of their inner qualities of the Soul, come into contact with them. As you understand (we are all adults), people are different, with completely different motives for such a game.
If a person invented this in order to make money from it, that is, for some selfish purposes, for example, they started telling people about the future, about the past, charging them for something, performing some influences, and pretended that God works through them, then they will, naturally, behave in such a way that they will have sessions for a certain, quite high price. They won't just waste their time and invent this for free. It is clear that if they are playing a role, they will try to get paid well for it, like any actor.
So what kind of being will come into contact with them? The one that matches their vibrations. If they love only themselves, but do not love all the surrounding people who come to them, regardless of their material well-being – accordingly, such beings will come into contact with them.
If they pretend to be a contactee because they are interested in it, but don't feel anything because they don't know how, never trained, didn't do meditations, didn't develop themselves, their sensitivity, their chakras. They just feel that this is their topic, they are interested in it and want other people to consider them a contactee because it's so great to be a contactee. Then those beings who are also interested in this will come to them. Their leading motive is interest, which means that beings whose motive is also interest in communicating with them will come into contact with them.
And whether they are good or evil, as you know, dear friends, depends on the content of their Spiritual heart. A person interested in something, for example, esotericism, can be either kind or not so kind. But, dear friends, if entities have come into contact with this person, this inventor, this fantasist, and they don't believe in them, then for quite a long time they may perceive their messages as their own thoughts. Or even think that they are going crazy, that some thoughts are sounding in their head or visions appear against their will. That is, they will get the contact for which they are completely unprepared.
But the funniest thing to observe is when a person thinks they are inventing, but in reality they are in contact. This is probably the funniest thing for those entities that are next to them. That is, this also happens.
So what to do, how to distinguish? By contact with the Higher Self, you can already understand. And you can understand by the actions that this contactee takes. If they say: "I will rid you of all your problems, come to my sessions, and I heal through God, through Archangel Michael, through Jesus, and only I communicate with Him. But my session costs this much per hour, per half hour," – there is a high probability that they are playing a role. Even if beings work through them, their goal is precisely not to convey this energy to people, but to earn money. This happens.
Dmitry: That's all, yes?
Irina: Yes, that's my opinion.
Dmitry: Will any of the curators say something?
Irina: Now MidgasKaus is speaking.
12:13 MidgasKaus on contacteeism.
Irina (MidgasKaus): The fact is that contactee is a very broad concept. In general, all people are contactees, at least with their Higher Self, with their unincarnated part of the Spirit, due to their spiritual channel, which every person has – it goes from the crown of the head upwards. It is precisely due to this channel that everyone is a contactee with their Higher Self. But this contact can be realized in different ways, that is, a person can perceive it simply as intuition, the voice of their conscience, for example. But it will still be contact with the Higher Self.
So, in the strict sense of the word, "non-contactees" do not exist at all. It's just that there are different degrees of awareness of this contact, and different curators come into contact. If a person invented, as Irina says, that they are a contactee, then where did these thoughts come from? Maybe their fantasy is not only theirs?
Dmitry: Okay, then the next question, also on this topic.
13:30 Mocking contactees.
Dmitry: How do you feel about the problem of ridicule and bullying of contactees who come out into the open? How do you deal with it?
Irina: This question is for me.
Dmitry: Yes, this is more for you.
Irina: Especially, how I deal with it.
Ridicule? You know, it's very important to look at the situation and at yourself with humor. Humor is not evil; it's just a look from the outside that allows you to see yourself through the eyes of another, let's put it that way. In the eyes of other people, we don't look the same as we do in our own. And it's important to treat this with understanding.
Not all people are ready to perceive this information. Of course, you can ask or say: "If they are not ready, why do they listen? Why do they watch then? Let them go and watch some TV series or cartoons. Why are they watching me, the great contactee, and still not liking something? And even laughing at me! No one forces them to watch."
Yes, dear friends, you are right: no one forces them. But there is one big "but": if they watch it and laugh at it, but don't leave... For example, they just said: "Ha-ha-ha, what nonsense!", and turned it off, then that's it, they don't need it, this topic is not interesting to them. But if they continue to watch, continue to laugh, even write some offensive comments or something, but still continue to watch, then why do they continue to watch? We ask ourselves a simple question: what prompts them to watch further if they find it unpleasant?
The answer is very simple: in the depths of their Soul, in that very Higher Self, they have an impulse. They have an impulse to watch this information; they have an inner deep request, possibly from a past life, to study this information or to awaken their own contact. But these attitudes in their mind (or, as we say, in their mental body) that "this doesn't exist," that "everyone who talks about this is a bit out of their mind," these attitudes prevent them from seeing the Light. And resisting it, they speak aggressively, start to ridicule or even insult this person. Because that is how their attitude resists within them.
And if they also have negative blocks associated with previous experience of turning to some esotericists, which ended, for example, in deception or their own disappointment? It happens that a person becomes disappointed even without deception; they just didn't like something. So this will also bring out their past pain from this block, cause the release of this energy, because the person will project their past experience, their past esotericists they encountered, onto the one they were listening to.
It is necessary to treat this with understanding, not to be rude in response. You can, for example, also respond with humor, but not be rude, not attach labels to them, not drive them away, but treat them with understanding. And at the same time, do not shame them: "Aren't you ashamed?" or something like that. If they behave like that, then they are not ashamed; you won't re-educate them anyway. You can just joke in response, say: "Yes, such are my contacts." This will reduce their aggression and, on the contrary, cause respect for you and interest in your information.
17:43 Irina's personal hobbies.
Dmitry: Okay, then the next question, it's partly for you, partly for the curators. Tell us about your hobbies. What are you interested in besides esotericism and contacteeism? And do you think that such a thing as hunting as a hobby or for the purpose of obtaining food is permissible given that modern man has access to food products?
Irina: Three questions in one. First hobbies, yes?
Dmitry: Yes, first hobbies, that's purely for you. The rest is for you and, in general, for everyone.
Irina: What are my hobbies? My main activity now is connected with helping people in terms of, as I already said, sessions with the Higher Self, in terms of teaching, in terms of transmitting information.
A hobby means my free time, what occupies it? I like to read books, I like to watch various videos – educational, scientific. I like to read literature, especially after we met MidgasKaus. He is a biologist by his education on another planet, and he tells me many things about our body. I like to read about medicine, for example. Earlier, when I had more free time, I liked to read books on various topics: I liked detective stories, science fiction if it was interesting, sometimes I read them. I also read just books about our life. I watched various films, I also liked that. That's what I had.
Now I like to walk outside, listen to music. That's the kind of rest I have.
As for the second question, it is, as you said, about hunting?
19:54 Is hunting animals permissible?
Dmitry: Yes, do you consider that such a thing as hunting, as a hobby or for the purpose of obtaining food, is permissible given that modern man has access to food products?
Irina: Permissible for me personally?
Dmitry: In general for a person, for humanity, for Earth.
Irina: You understand, now MidgasKaus is speaking, he clarifies: "Are we talking specifically about our personal moral norms, or is it permissible for humanity as a whole"?
Dmitry: We can say both, and so. Because the main thing, of course, is for humanity as a whole, for development, so to speak, of humanity. But also in your, so to speak, moral principles, is it appropriate, is it permissible?
Irina: Now MidgasKaus is speaking.
(MidgasKaus) I remind you that I live on a planet where we have only a lacto-vegetarian diet due to the biology of our organisms: our animal ancestors fed only on plants and milk. You also have such animals. We, in principle, did not have such a concept as hunting. Therefore, naturally, on our planet Esler, no one is engaged in this, due to the lack, so to speak, of necessity. Even in ancient times, there was no need for it. Can gathering fruits be called hunting? Yes, some people call gathering berries and mushrooms "quiet hunting." Well, I don't know... In any case, this is more of an earthly concept.
(Irina) Personally for me – I believe that hunting at the moment is not a hobby. It can rather be permissible if a person lives in conditions where it is impossible to obtain food in any other way. And we even have such peoples – living practically surrounded by wild nature, where it is very difficult to get any food. Or there are such villages – they can be Russian or from representatives of other nationalities – where generations live by some kind of hunting trade. It could be fishing, if they sell fish there (also a type of hunting), it could be hunting for fur-bearing animals, for their skins. They sell them there and live only by that. Their grandfathers, their fathers taught them that, entire generations like that. Even now, in the 21st century, such families exist.
I believe that this is the personal choice of these people, but personally I would not live like that. Because this work, firstly, is not interesting to me; I do completely different things. I don't even do agriculture now. That was earlier; I came from a village where I was engaged in agriculture, growing – I had a vegetable garden, livestock, and so on. Now I work with people.
But even when I lived in the village, I would not go hunting, because these animals are meant to live in the wild. That is my understanding. Therefore, if I were in the place of these people, if I could, of course, I would just move to where I could get food in another way. But the fact that they live there and continue this activity is their choice; I have nothing to say here. But this is not my way of life; it is not an easy job at all – neither psychologically, nor physically, nor spiritually. I don't know to what extent this can be precisely a hobby, but I believe that this can only be for sustenance.
But if you mean precisely those people who go out specifically as a hobby – they have food, they go out as a hobby for fishing and hunting, but they don't need this catch as food. They either sell it, but again, not needing the money, but simply because it shouldn't be thrown away. I believe this is just entertainment at the expense of the lives of other beings that could live in the wild. For example, if they want to shoot, they can perfectly do that at a shooting range.
But this, again, is my personal opinion. That's my opinion.
Dmitry: So, summarizing the answer to this question: if a person has access to food products, then you consider hunting unacceptable, yes?
Irina: Whether it is permissible or not, each person must decide for themselves. Personally for me, this would be an unacceptable way of life: to go somewhere with a gun just to shoot someone... If you have other food, grown, then wild – what grew in nature, I don't even know who would eat that. If a person can, of course, buy better in the store.
Because wild animals that live in nature, firstly, can be infected with various parasites, microbes, and so on. And if they live near humans, if it is livestock, a person at least looks after them, vaccinates them, cares for them, makes sure they don't have contagious diseases, and so on and so forth.
Moreover, if a hunter hunts large animals, who primarily falls prey to them? Weak animals, weakened by something, that are unable to run away from them. That is, if several animals are running away, the hunters will shoot the one that is unable to run fast. That means there is already a risk that a sick animal will be caught. They won't test it for anything. And this is already a risk to one's own health.
And secondly, even in taste – I just know, we lived in the countryside, and I communicated closely with hunters; they treated me to such game – it's absolutely incomparable to the meat of domestic animals, even store-bought. Because they are fed different food there – grain, and so on. In the wild, they will get very coarse food, will often experience a lack of nutrition. Simply put, such meat can only be eaten if you are starving, if you understand what I'm talking about.
But if a person has already tried ordinary domestic animals, I don't think they will hunt for food. Either they simply have nothing to eat: they live somewhere very far away, where this meat is not brought, or it is very expensive. For example, we have many hunters living in Siberia. They sometimes sell it themselves there. Or there are some other reasons, already purely psychological. For example, they feel significant when they bring home this catch: they got it themselves, they killed these animals themselves. These are purely psychological reasons when they have the opportunity to buy.
Therefore, I personally do not consider such a pastime acceptable for myself if there is no serious necessity. But this is about animals.
29:10 Is fishing permissible?
Irina: About fish, it's more complicated, because fishing very often... After all, the fish we buy, especially river and sea fish, is also not farmed anywhere; it is caught. Of course, there are types of fish that are precisely farmed in artificial reservoirs, and there are those that are caught. We have fishing cooperatives on ships – both on large rivers and in the seas. Perhaps, if you have been to the sea, you have seen that along the coast, even in autumn, winter, if it's on the Black Sea, fishing boats are sailing, catching fish in the open sea.
Therefore, if you eat fish, you can catch it yourself, you can buy it – there is no difference, because it was still caught for you. And whether you pay for this fish or spend your time to go and catch it is your business.
But again, if you eat it yourself and sell the rest, for example. Not like you catch it, it's small, it already died because you caught it and kept it in that net cage. Or you realized you don't need it and you throw it away. That kind of attitude towards nature is, of course, unacceptable. Personally, I think so. Because if you caught it, you must eat it.
That's my opinion. Because livestock, unlike wild animals, we raise ourselves. But fish that are sold can also be caught. That's what I think.
Dmitry: Okay. Then the next question, it's quite detailed.
31:26 What is raising awareness?
Dmitry: The next question is: there is such a concept as "raising awareness." What do you put into it? That is, what is raising awareness for you?
Irina: Raising awareness is increasing knowledge, but not just knowledge, but aware knowledge. That is, with faith in this knowledge – not just "I know it, but I don't believe in it, I reject it." It is the acceptance of knowledge.
Knowledge about what? Knowledge that we are not just bodies, but that we are immortal Spirits who are in this world to fulfill our task. We are not just temporary beings who are born on this planet, grow, study, work, rest, reproduce, and die. No, this is only our material life. We have a body and we have a Spirit. We consist of two parts, one temporary and the second eternal. And when this temporary part dies... What does death mean? The separation of the temporal from the eternal. And we, as Spirits, go on to fulfill our tasks.
Awareness includes understanding what these tasks consist of. This is communication with the Higher Self. Communication with the Higher Self is communication with a part of God. By that, I mean the Creator of the entire Universe, whatever name it is called in other languages, there are many, naturally, different names: the Absolute or the Supreme Intelligence. For Russian people, probably the word "God" is more suitable, as we are used to calling the Source of the entire Universe. This Source of the entire Universe has Light, spiritual Light, the one that illuminates all darkness and dissolves it in itself. Darkness – that means all evil, all imperfection.
Having invested a part of Himself in us as His children, He gave us His Divine nature. This is what the parable is about when Jesus said that "God gave each person one talent." That is, this is absolutely in every person. And this talent is precisely the Divine nature. But every person has a choice in this life: either in this material world, using material instruments, to multiply this talent and make two talents, five talents, or even ten out of it – to increase one's Divine nature, or to "bury it in the ground."
There is such an expression that Jesus Christ used – "to bury one's talent in the ground." What does it mean – "to bury one's talent in the ground"? It means to spend the time of one's incarnation and one's Divine potential only on material activity. "Earth" here is a symbol of matter. Matter is by no means bad or evil. It's simply an instrument for achieving spiritual goals. But if the instrument itself is taken as the goal, then no awareness, no wisdom, and no development comes out of it. Understanding this is, in my view, awareness.
Dmitry: Okay, then now this question.
35:15 What are material and spiritual vibrations?
Dmitry: Often in esoteric circles, you can hear statements like "you have lowered your vibrations," "you are vibrating at low frequencies," and so on. What do you think "low" vibrations are, and what are "high" ones? Why are low frequencies worse than high ones?
Irina: You understand, Dmitry, to answer this question, I first need to explain what "vibrations" are. The fact is that we have an understanding of spiritual vibrations, and there are also material vibrations. Material vibration or the word "vibrations" is, firstly, a word of non-Russian origin. It means oscillation. So, in the material world, material vibrations are vibrations of the electromagnetic field. They are distributed by frequencies: low frequencies or high frequencies. It would seem clear that these are oscillations of electromagnetic waves, ranging from heat, to light, ultraviolet, radiation, and so on. That is, the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves.
And what then can we call spiritual vibrations? What "vibrates" there, what oscillates there? One could, of course, say: the Divine Light itself vibrates or oscillates. This is already a non-material substance, but nevertheless, we can imagine that it also has a frequency of some kind of oscillation...
Now Archangel Raphael has also decided to answer the question. He is answering this question now.
(Archangel Raphael) The whole point is that these phenomena of the Spiritual world are called vibrations only by analogy, by symbolism, in comparison with the material world. As in the material world – the higher the vibrations, the closer, so to speak, to gamma radiation, that is, to all-penetrating radiation, which penetrates even the thickest walls, the closer to stellar radiation. I mean X-ray radiation, gamma radiation, which we call "hard radiation." Yes, it is dangerous for physical bodies, but it is also Divine energy. And since it has the highest vibrations, one could say, it generates all the others: through the gradual lowering of the vibrations of these electromagnetic waves, the entire visible world is born, including light waves, and so on.
As for spiritual vibrations, these words refer to spiritual qualities or spiritual nature. Qualities – certain feelings, desires, or emotions, that is, some spiritual processes that occur in our Spirits, that is, already inside not the body, but the Spirit. Through the body, they manifest. But you need to understand that in the Spiritual world, we are also not deprived of the property – to experience feelings, emotions, or desires, although without a body. Unincarnated Spirits understand this very well, as they are also not deprived of feelings and emotions.
39:09 What can vibrations be measured by?
Irina (Archangel Raphael): What vibrations then can we call low and high in the spiritual sense, if these are qualities? To call some high and some low, we must think about what we take as the standard for their measurement, what we take as the ideal. What will we compare with to call them high or low? You understand that the measurement of the vibrations themselves depends on this standard? So, if in material vibrations the standard of measurement is the so-called "hertz" – one oscillation per second, then in spiritual vibrations, this will not work. There is no time as such there. What then will we take as a standard?
The highest spiritual vibration is the one that generated all the others, which is the primary source. So, the highest spiritual vibration is called "unconditional Divine Love." Without Love, there is no life. It is because of Love that we were all born from the primordial Spiritual Light. It is because of Love that all worlds, all galaxies, all aliens, and everything else appeared. If there were no Love, no one would have life. It is with unconditional Divine Love that all other feelings, all other desires, aspirations, what they are directed towards, and, naturally, emotions and thoughts must be compared.
Thoughts are, so to speak, a product of the Spiritual heart. If we look at the Spiritual heart, its state generates thoughts. As the Spiritual heart is, what it is filled with, so will a person's thoughts be.
So, if we talk about which vibrations are high, these are those that are closer to unconditional Divine Love. If we see some spiritual quality that is not full Divine Love, then it is lower in vibrations. And if it completely denies Divine Love, then these are the lowest vibrations, that is, those that, one could say, are incompatible with Divine Love.
Yes, any energy, any thought, any feeling are derivatives of Love. But the one who experiences them is intelligent, and therefore possesses free will, freedom of choice. They can direct this Love of theirs not only to high vibrations, but also to low ones, simply by refracting this Divine energy through their mental attitudes that "this is exactly right." That is how we define that which differs from unconditional Divine Love in the opposite direction; we call it "low vibrations."
Is it always bad to experience them? You know, "good," "bad" – if from the perspective of happiness and suffering, then, of course, low vibrations bring suffering, and then it is bad. But it all depends on how the person relates to them later, further. If they realized that these are low vibrations and, with the help of this awareness, came to higher vibrations, passed this experience, this lesson, then it served them for development. Let's put it that way.
43:20 What is Love?
Dmitry: The next question just concerns Love. It sounds like this: what is Love for you? What do you put into this concept? What kind of Love was Jesus talking about when he preached about Love for one's neighbor?
Irina: This question is for Archangel Raphael, who is, after all, an Archangel and an unincarnated Spirit.
(Archangel Raphael) What I am talking about now is unconditional Divine Love, but, of course, there are many types of Love. There is Love for a particular person, there is Love for some thing, there is Love for some phenomenon, there is Love for oneself, and there is Love for God. But all forms of Love are manifestations of one single energy of Love, simply directed at one or another object.
Remember yourself when you love. What is it, what kind of energy? Love is a state of unity with the beloved being. If it is unconditional Love, then it is unity without shades of elevation, without a feeling of belonging of this object to oneself. Because there is love that is distorted by egoism, that is, one could say, by a feeling of greed, when a person considers the beloved as their own part, but at the same time does not consider themselves a part of this person. This is such an elevation. But real, true, unconditional Love is a state where you completely feel yourself equal with this person and with this personality, and at the same time feel yourself one with them. What does "one" mean? It means that their joy is your joy, their pain is your pain. You are one, a single being. This is precisely unconditional Love for oneself, for one's neighbor, and for God. This is the very Divine Love that Jesus spoke about.
The one who is filled with such Love cannot simply be indifferent to the troubles of their neighbor. But their attitude towards this suffering person will not be limited only to feelings; it will not be limited only to exclamations that this is unfair. If this is true Divine Love, it is always practical; a person necessarily manifests it in matter. They always save, help the one who suffers, because they feel their suffering as their own. They do not stand nearby and read morality to the perishing, but simply help them free themselves from the cause of their suffering. Even if this is impossible, they will always be there.
True Love is devoid of the ability to accuse a person of their troubles. Even if someone is indeed guilty, at first the loving person will help them get rid of the immediate dangers, get rid of the suffering, as much as possible, and only then together with them analyze the reasons for getting into this situation. True Love is devoid of the ability to attach, as you call it, "labels" to another: to attribute some personality qualities, their temporary actions to the whole personality – this is also a form of accusation. True Love understands that the one who has fallen into low vibrations needs help. Not accusation, but help!
True Love is devoid of rudeness. True Love is devoid of the desire to justify oneself. Even if it is accused of something, it does not accuse in return. This is always an unconditionally and absolutely pure Light that is in the Soul of every person when we are in the embrace of our Heavenly Father, who loves us very much. Why is He called the Heavenly Father? Because He generated life and the possibility of life in the entire Universe, created our entire Universe with His energy, and generated us as Spirits.
So, true Love is always pure, it is always honest, it always speaks the true truth – the true truth to oneself and others. True Love is devoid of the fear that your truth might not be liked by someone. True Love is always aimed at helping a person improve. True Love is devoid of so-called people-pleasing, when a person is told pleasant words, internally disagreeing with them or considering them mistaken. True Love will always prompt a person where they are mistaken and how to correct it without any notes of elevation over them.
(Irina) That's what he says.
Dmitry: That's all, yes?
Irina: Yes. Because one could talk for a long time.
Dmitry: Let's move to the next question. We are already approaching the end.
50:38 On polygyny and polyandry. Monogamy on Esler.
Dmitry: How do you feel about such phenomena as polyamory and polygamy, that is, several partners in relationships and sex? What are your views on the topic of sexual deviations?
Irina: Who is the question for?
Dmitry: For you, and for the curators.
Irina: Once again about partners. I just don't fully understand the meaning of the words. Let's do it in Russian.
Dmitry: It means several partners in relationships – the same as polygyny or polyandry, harems. And what are your views on sexual deviations, for example, such as various "philias"?
Irina: For example?
Dmitry: For example, pedophilia or zoophilia. What are your views on such deviations? But first, of course, about polygamy.
Irina: Personally for me, brought up in Russia, in the Christian tradition, this is an unacceptable form of marriage, because I believe that by nature a woman should have one man, and a man one woman, precisely because a third in this marriage will still cause some, one might say, rivalry.
Even if they all love each other, still, I believe they have some... Even if they don't, there is a greater risk, so to speak, of rivalry arising, if there are several wives or several husbands. Especially when children appear. And it is very difficult for that partner, whether man or woman, who is the single partner, to maintain equal Love for everyone, to have peace in this family. That's what I think with my understanding, because I don't see myself in such relationships; I was raised in the Christian tradition, where, for example, one husband and one wife.
As for other people who are brought up in the tradition of polygyny – in Islam, for example, or some other tradition, or polyandry in some traditions, I think, why it is acceptable for them – they have such upbringing from childhood, let's put it that way; they consider precisely such a marriage happy. And if it actually raises their vibrations, if marriage with one partner would lower their vibrations, then I don't pay attention to it: it's their right.
But personally for myself, I don't see such a possibility, because I still think that some rivalry will exist. Again, I understand that these are my concepts, my understandings, which may be wrong for them. But I believe that for me personally, this is the truth. At the same time, I understand that my truth may be a mistake for them. Let them think that way. That, as they say, is their full right.
This is about marriages with one partner or several – we just have different marriage traditions even on one planet, as you can see. What is considered acceptable in one culture is unacceptable in another, and vice versa. What can we say about other planets?! Anything is possible there.
Now Mid is answering that they generally have one... Yes, I remember, you said.
(MidgasKaus) On the planet Esler, we also reproduce sexually, similarly but not exactly the way earthlings do. But sexual attraction from a man to a woman or from a woman to a man on our planet is possible only in the case of a complete match in vibrations, which an Eslerian can experience only towards one being. For us, even infidelity on a physical level is impossible, because sexual attraction simply will not arise towards another being other than the one with whom we have united spiritually. Such is our nature – of our body, our hormones, one could say.
(Irina) Therefore, this issue is not relevant for them. As he says: "This issue is not relevant for us." They simply wouldn't want to live that way.
Dmitry: And what can be said about the second part of the question, about deviations?
Irina: I believe that if it is normal for them, if it makes them happy, loving, and they don't experience any negativity – neither do the wives feel any jealousy towards each other, nor does the mother of one child feel any jealousy towards the mother of another child from her husband or towards the child itself; if she treats them the same as her own, and there is no jealousy regarding the father's attention (maybe such people exist) – so I'm not against it; please, peace and Love to them!
But I don't see myself in these relationships, honestly. Because, after all, people have instincts, for example, the parental instinct as part of the reproduction instinct. When some subconscious jealousy arises or dislike for a child from another woman, conceived by your own husband. This, again, is in my understanding.
57:31 Causes of pedophilia.
Irina: As for the second part of the question: how do I feel about pedophilia, zoophilia, and something else?
Dmitry: Yes, yes, yes, about deviations.
Irina: I believe that such sexual behavior is connected with negative blocks in a person, which they may have acquired in childhood. Because of this, their sexual instinct, the reproduction instinct, works incorrectly. It manifests not according to its nature – for uniting with the opposite sex, bearing children, or receiving pleasure from uniting with the body of the opposite sex.
If a person has received some kind of psychic trauma related to children (when they themselves were a small child), specifically tied to a sexual theme, they may have some fears. And instead of attraction to a woman, if it's a man, or to a man, if it's a woman, they for some reason experience attraction to a child. The desire to unite with them is unnatural; a child cannot be an object of sexual feelings for an adult, because, firstly, they are not ready for this, as they have not yet physically grown. Their body must reach the appropriate age, safe for uniting with them, and their psyche must be prepared for this.
A child should be doing completely different things in childhood, but not sex: they should be playing, they should be learning about the world. Their corresponding hormones are not yet working; more precisely, they are working, but still only preparing the body for sex in the future and, accordingly, for conception and childbirth. Therefore, if a person experiences attraction to a child, I believe this is unnatural, it is not in accordance with nature. That is, this is an energetic, psycho-energetic negative block in their aura; it is precisely this that prevents this sexual instinct from manifesting correctly, and instead of attraction to an adult, attraction to children arises.
They agree with me now – both Mid and Archangel Raphael. Now they are saying: "Yes, we agree that it is precisely the block that prevents attraction to an adult from manifesting."
But the fact is that pedophiles, by the way, become so for different motives. There are pedophiles who commit violence against children not because they have attraction to them. They even have wives, for example, if they are men, and they have attraction to adult women too. But they have blocks on another topic – they may have a dislike for society. These are so-called sociopaths who deny something in society, have a feeling of hatred, for example, a feeling of anger, but hide it in their soul, because it is not customary in society to show it. And at the same time, they are not ready, do not want to work on forgiving the one who offended them very much. As a result, all this causes in them a desire to hurt someone.
That is, in this case, pedophilia acts not precisely as a sexual attraction to a child – a sociopath has attraction to adults too, but because of their hatred. They commit violent acts against a child, perfectly understanding that they are tormenting them, because the child is not ready to unite, hasn't grown up yet, and because of this suffers. And from the fact that this person causes suffering to a small child, they feel power over them. And from this, they experience satisfaction, because they have not dissolved their block of resentment when someone exercised power over them and mocked them. Moreover, it was not necessarily physical; sometimes moral mockery is even worse than physical. And because of this, the sociopath, as it were, splashes their block onto the child.
Such forms also exist. This also lowers the vibrations of this person, the pedophile. Besides the fact that it's a crime, I am now speaking specifically about the spiritual consequences. If a person never realizes that they acted wrongly and does not dissolve this block in themselves before leaving incarnation, they can lower their spiritual level very much.
1:02:50 The nature of zoophilia.
Irina: As for zoophilia, again such a question – about attraction to animals. Yes, I remember, you told me, MidgasKaus. The fact is that precisely zoophilia, unlike pedophilia, arose for other reasons.
Maybe you have heard such a word as "totemism." It is the recognition of divine properties in animals and the recognition of one's origin from animals, which was in ancient times among many tribes on Earth. People lived among nature, and they deified some animals, and this was based, among other things, on contacts with plasmoid civilizations, which, as we know, create the souls of animals and their incarnation.
By the way, plasmoids not only create the souls of animals, they also monitor the number of incarnations of these souls in bodies, monitor the overall ecological balance in a given territory. So that there is a certain number of plants, a certain number of different species of animals, so that they do not interfere with each other, and so that they do not exterminate each other and some specific biosphere entirely. That is, to keep it in balance.
So, these plasmoid civilizations, seeing that people lived next to them (there were no cities then, they lived among nature, in some settlements, etc.), came into contact with people, appeared in the form of animals, as this showed that they create their souls. And those who come into contact with plasmoids soon learn that some plasmoids in the Astral like to unite with the astral bodies of people through sexual contact.
For some plasmoids, especially the earthly group, this is a form of energy exchange. In the Astral, they take different forms and enter into sexual contact with a person who has gone out into the Astral. Many people dream this – that in a dream they experience sexual contact with someone, experience real feelings, real sensations there. This is precisely contact with a plasmoid; many just consider it a dream.
And ancient tribes, when they deified some animals, believed, firstly, that sexual union with them would bring them special energies that the given animal possesses. I remind you that earlier sex was viewed not only as a means of procreation, but also as a magical or sacred act, for example, increasing fertility. That is, zoophilia was earlier connected precisely with contacts of this kind.
Because by nature, it is very difficult for a person to experience sexual attraction to an animal that does not have the form of a human body at all, unlike children, for example. Children have the form of a human body, but animals do not. For a person to experience sexual arousal seeing an animal, they must invent, so to speak, an appropriate mental attitude for themselves.
1:06:54 Why is zoophilia harmful?
Irina: I personally believe that such forms of communication with animals are completely unacceptable. Animals are not meant for uniting with a person, not to mention some biological aspect – the same infections and so on, which can pass from animals to humans. We remember that animals are beings guided by instinctive intelligence; they do not have the same understanding as humans. They can harm a person, for example, inflict injury on them. They don't have the same understanding as a human partner. That is, it's a danger, a risk.
Moreover, the union itself with an animal brings an exchange of energies: in any sexual contact, there is always an exchange of energies, with whomever it may be. But if it's a union with an animal, then the energy from the animal is incompatible in a sexual sense with the energy of a person, and because of this, they may have not only physical damage, but also damage to the aura, chakras. They become energetically weakened.
In ancient times, this was done for this very contact, for some magical rituals; they did it to achieve some of their goals – healing from diseases, possibly bearing a child, increasing the harvest. Or there was a request to these animals, whom they considered gods, to avert some natural disaster. That is, the goals in ancient times were only such – magical, let's put it that way, or mythological. Now we no longer believe in this, but some people still have this understanding that the animal is attractive; it comes from there.
"Why do modern people have this?" – you may, of course, ask. Maybe it comes precisely from some subconscious memories of a past life. Maybe it comes from the fact that a person has some kind of contact with a plasmoid, as we call it, an attachment. And this plasmoid sends them such images so that they unite with an animal. This always needs to be considered individually. A very complex question.
Dmitry: Okay, in principle, everything is clear. Let's move on to the next questions then. Let's answer more concisely, if possible, to save time, because we've already been recording for over an hour.
1:09:48 What is compassion?
Dmitry: The next question is very short: what is compassion for you?
Irina: Compassion is a feeling in one's Soul, and sometimes even in the physical body, of what another being is experiencing, when a person sees that they are, one might say, experiencing torment, some kind of suffering. That is, they feel bad, in pain, they want to get away from these sensations. And when a person looks at this, they have a natural feeling that transfers it to themselves. This feeling exists in absolutely all people, developed to varying degrees, of course. That is, "I could be in that place." And from this transference, such feelings appear in the Soul – maybe fear, sympathy, simple sadness, and so on.
This already depends on attitudes. But compassion itself is an unpleasant sensation that, one might say, appears when we look at someone's suffering. We want to help them, in order to stop this suffering. This is a completely natural feeling that exists, one might say, in any intelligent being that understands what is happening.
Dmitry: Okay, then the next question.
1:11:35 The connection between vegetarianism and vibrations.
Dmitry: How do you feel about vegetarianism? Does such a diet affect vibrations? And do alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and garlic lower vibrations?
Irina: So many questions! And you still want me to answer briefly!
Dmitry: You can just answer in bullet points.
Irina: Vegetarianism is a person's choice of diet that does not involve the consumption of animal food. There are different forms of vegetarianism. If we are talking about classical vegetarianism, no animal food is consumed at all. If we are talking about lacto-vegetarianism, dairy products are consumed. And there are other forms, for example, when eggs, fish, or meat of certain animals are consumed, but not all, and so on.
Also, vegetarianism exists by the type of plants consumed: it could be all plants or some group. For example, as in raw food diet, raw products, or fruitarianism, as they call it – eating only fruits, or something else. That is, this is a special type of human nutrition. It is quite possible to live like that, be happy, and develop spiritually.
Why does a person choose it? For completely different reasons. How do I feel about it? I feel quite calm about it. It is everyone's personal choice. Does it raise vibrations? Well, yes, of course, if a person believes in it. If they believe that the food they eat raises their vibrations. That is, whether a person is a vegetarian or not, and whether food raises or lowers their vibrations, depends on their awareness, on how they relate to it.
1:13:44 How to make food beneficial?
Irina: You have probably seen people who, when they eat something, do it automatically, simply consuming proteins, fats, and carbohydrates – so-called calories. This food is neutral; it neither lowers nor raises their vibrations. It's like just taking some vitamin, a pill, only not in concentrated form, but in the form of various dishes. The person has a neutral attitude towards food, simply as a nutrient.
And if a person relates to some food, any kind of food that is on their table, as a gift from God (if they are a believer), thanks God for this food (there is such a prayer before eating) or reads a mantra (if they follow a different faith), that is, thanks God for food in the form accepted in their religion or faith, then they raise the vibrations of this food, or even water that they have blessed. The energy they put into this prayer…
Of course, if it is done sincerely, and not just for show – "what a good person I am, praying before eating" – if they said it sincerely, even if mentally, to themselves (God hears us even mentally). Nevertheless, if they said it sincerely, with Love: "I thank you, God, for this food and for giving it to me," by this prayer they raise the vibrations of their food, and therefore of themselves, who will eat it.
And if a person, consuming any food, treats it with hostility, with thoughts that it is bad, harmful, something else, that it leads them away from the Light, from the spiritual path, with these thoughts they do the opposite of prayer. That is, if prayer is thanking God in such a form, and it raises vibrations. And if a person treats some food with hostility and still eats it, then one could ask: why do they eat it if they treat it with hostility? Well, for example, because of the taste, they might eat it, but at the same time treat it as food with hostility. For example, "it tastes good, but it's harmful."
That is, they eat and at the same time reject it themselves. That means they charge this food with rejection, disgust, non-love, low vibrations, let's put it that way. And when they eat it, they give a signal to their body not to accept this food. And our Spirit, as we remember, influences the body: just as the body influences the Spirit, so the Spirit influences the body. And this food indeed lowers their vibrations, because they ate something that their Soul rejects. Moreover, it not only lowers a person's spiritual vibrations, but also affects their body and can even cause some real illness, for example, indigestion or insufficiency of liver and pancreas enzymes. The Spirit gave the command that "I don't need this." And so it is with any food.
1:17:52 Is man omnivorous?
Irina: Since we are by nature omnivorous, we can eat products of both animal and plant origin, we can combine them together or consume them separately. If by nature God placed us in such bodies, it is not accidental. This is so that we learn to thank God and love Him for any food. This, again, is my understanding.
Therefore, if we want to eat something, if we really want it and sincerely thank God, then any food, to whomever its soul belongs – the soul of an animal or the soul of a plant – will be beneficial. You remember that plants also have their own plant souls, these are group souls; they are alive, by the way, and also grow, feed, reproduce. They just don't walk, so to speak, but they are alive.
And it raises vibrations even more when we not only thank God for the received food, but also thank those souls that participated in growing this body, whatever substances this body consists of. If it's an animal, it still ate plants. If it's a plant, it fed on the sun and substances in the ground. But in any case, it was a soul that has now left. If we are sincerely grateful to God and to the soul that lived there...
By the way, plant souls can also reincarnate a certain number of times, and then dissipate in the Astral. So, if we are grateful to these souls and to the plasmoid civilizations that created these souls (you can simply say in general – "I thank this soul and its creators"), then we raise the vibrations of the food even more by our awareness. And we bring Light to that soul of the animal or plant that sacrificed its life so that we could nourish our body and continue life in this world.
And if we treat food as something harmful, but still eat it, then we will lower our vibrations, hinder our spiritual development, and harm our body. That is, if we accept something, we must accept it with gratitude. If we are not ready to accept food with gratitude to the given soul and to God Himself, then we simply should not eat it.
This will be spiritual development in my understanding.
1:21:02 Lowering vibrations from alcohol.
Irina: As for alcohol. You know, again, everyone's understanding is different. But I will say mine, probably more: I live on Earth.
Alcohol, for me personally as a substance, is essentially no different from any other food. It is one of the types of food, a product. Yes, it is consumed for pleasure. It doesn't have any useful substances. But admit, dear friends, that in some products that people also consume for pleasure – sweets, candies, ice cream, lemonade, and so on, which we, by the way, give to children, there is also practically no useful substance for humans. And we understand this. There are some preservatives, dyes, flavorings, right? But, nevertheless, we not only drink and eat these ourselves but often give them to children. Why do we buy these at our own expense? For pleasure – just like alcohol.
Alcohol causes pleasure due to what? Due to its effect on the human brain. But if a person has some negative blocks that prevent them from living, then this relaxation and this light joy, fun, and escape from problems that alcohol provides by affecting brain receptors, they may perceive as a means to escape from their inner experiences, which they had even before alcohol. And they may repeat these alcohol consumptions often and become dependent on it, changing their metabolism so much that their cells stop producing it themselves.
Our cells always produce some amount of their own internal alcohol. So, if you consume alcohol very often, you accustom your body to the external intake of this substance. And then you become dependent on it. That is, a person begins to feel bad without this substance; some thoughts appear even in inappropriate situations when there is no reason to drink alcohol, as is the case with ordinary people – some holiday or something. For those who develop dependence, thoughts about it appear not on holidays, but on some ordinary day when there seems to be no reason at all. As they say, they start looking for a reason themselves.
Why? Because they already feel bad without this substance. At first, the soul feels bad, there is no joy, and so on. There is no feeling of this relaxation; something is stressing them. This is such a "first bell" when a person should think about what blocks they have and dissolve them, because you can't dissolve them with alcohol anyway. It doesn't dissolve them, as these are energetic blocks. And if a person becomes dependent, gradually accustoming their body to it, it will be very difficult for them to remain in any high vibrations, to go to God, to go to unconditional Love, if they constantly drink alcohol.
Firstly, the person is in an altered state of consciousness, when their thoughts are confused, feelings are very vivid, and there is practically no self-control. In this state, a person can bring out their blocks and not even remember what they did. But this in no way contributes to raising vibrations. That's the first thing.
Secondly. As is known, we don't get alcohol for free; you have to buy it, it is sold in stores. Over time, when a person drinks constantly and becomes dependent, they need more and more alcohol, and therefore more money to buy it. A person, if they start entering this dependence, begins to spend more and more time and money on it. And since they are already intoxicated at work, and you need to be sober there, they may lose their job and be left with no money at all, only with their new blocks and problems in the family.
And this will lower their vibrations even more. They will have nothing to buy alcohol with, and from this they will experience negativity, anger, fear. And all this will already lower their spiritual vibrations. Well, and actually, the body, which cannot process such amounts of alcohol, will be destroyed – liver, heart, brain. From body pains, nausea, hypertension, and so on that will arise, they will also suffer. They will experience dislike for their body – this will also lower their spiritual vibrations.
You see: there is nothing good in this. That is, alcohol is a very good "litmus test," so to speak, for blocks. If a person has no blocks, they will not become attached to this substance, even if they consume it from time to time. And if they do, then yes, such a danger exists for them. But it is generated by the person themselves, not by alcohol. Alcohol is just a substance, as they say.
1:27:27 Dangers of drugs.
Irina: Drugs are a very complex question. Because if I say that alcohol, so to speak, is permitted by law, and drugs are prohibited, so you can't use them, then they will immediately object: "But in this country, this is allowed, and in this country, that is allowed." I just know that's how people answer. Or: "But this, for example, substance is less harmful than alcohol." They might say something else to me.
You know, dear friends, I think this: when we artificially introduce any substances, any drugs, into our body for pleasure, to achieve some altered states of consciousness, we do this for some other reason. If we drink alcohol, it is in our tradition – to celebrate holidays that way. That's our thousand-year history. And if we do this with drugs, then, at least in our Russia, there is no such tradition – to celebrate holidays with drugs.
If we buy prohibited drugs, we are committing a crime against the law. We live in this country, which means we must obey its laws or leave here, for example. Because since we live here, are under the protection of the police, under the protection of the army, pay taxes, and so on, we must strive to be law-abiding, I believe. And if we strive to be lawless, we can go to prison for it, which will in no way raise our vibrations. Not at all. Because there is restriction of freedom and the corresponding environment.
If a person risks their freedom for some short-term pleasure, I don't think they had high vibrations initially. How would a drug lower them if they were already quite low? If they are ready to risk their freedom, being caught, and so on. Because, perhaps, the one selling them the drug is an undercover officer from the drug enforcement department, or informs on them. They have no way of knowing this. And, by the way, there is also some responsibility for buying, for possession.
Why take such a risk? It's not clear to me, because the altered state of consciousness they achieve, I think, is not worth it. If they think it is worth it, then these are already low vibrations, because for short-term pleasure, they are risking some part of their life, which they might spend not free. Simply put, they are not fulfilling the tasks of their incarnation because of some substance. They might not fulfill them. That's what I think.
1:30:56 Why nicotine is harmful.
Irina: Nicotine – well, yes, unlike drugs, it is permitted for use. Its use cannot be compared to drugs in the spiritual sense of the word. But how can I say it... I believe it's slow self-poisoning.
Because we all perfectly understand that if a person can consume alcohol several times a year, for example, on New Year's, on a birthday, or once a month (as some are used to), you probably won't see a person smoking a cigarette once a month, like alcohol. Because a cigarette is more or less constantly present with a person, unlike alcohol. And if it's constantly present, then it's still constant self-poisoning. After all, besides nicotine, cigarette smoke contains many thousands of harmful substances, even radioactive substances. And all this enters the body, into the blood, into the lungs, constantly lowers immunity.
But does it lower spiritual vibrations? If a person sincerely believes that it doesn't harm them at all, that they are smoking some vitamins, probably... As in ancient times, they thought it was beneficial; tobacco was even sold in pharmacies as a remedy for various ailments (it was first sold in pharmacies), and people believed it was beneficial. Therefore, even many priests smoked, even emperors believed it was beneficial. And if a person thinks so, then it will in no way affect their vibrations; they simply sincerely believe in it.
And if they feel that it is destroying them, if they feel that it is harmful to their body, but still continue to destroy it – it's not even that vibrations are lowered; they are simply low initially. They simply do not love their body, let's put it that way. Instead of using that money to buy something, some vitamins or something else, to support their body, they are slowly poisoning it.
That's what I think, for example. This is also my personal opinion. But again, it's the person's own business. This is simply non-love for one's own body, I believe.
Dmitry: Okay.
1:33:49 Is garlic harmful?
Dmitry: So, we won't ask about garlic then; it relates to nutrition.
Irina: I have a normal attitude towards garlic, although I don't really like it. But I can sometimes eat a little onion or garlic.
More of it, you know, when you want it – when a person has just, not exactly caught a cold, but communicated, for example, with a person who has the flu or something like that. Then they feel that they don't have a cold or stuffy nose yet, but already some malaise. Dry mouth begins, a little stuffy nose, eyes itch, and so on. There's no temperature yet, but just before this state, a person may want to eat a lot of mustard, horseradish, garlic, or fresh onion like that. This is how the body hints that these are antiviral, antimicrobial plants, and the person may want them.
Also (now Mid is prompting me), that's right: in general, all spicy foods – pepper, garlic, ginger, mustard – may be strongly liked by those people who have parasites in the intestines. That is, the body hints to the person to eat them to kill the parasites.
Dmitry: Okay.
1:35:26 Alternative to meat on other planets.
Dmitry: The next question is very important. Meat, which forms the basis of nutrition for most people on planet Earth, is obtained by killing animals. How do you feel about this? And are there, in your opinion, any alternative methods of obtaining animal protein without killing?
Irina: Currently on Earth?
Dmitry: In general.
Irina (MidgasKaus): On different planets, the approach to this is different. There are, for example, those where various insects, of different sizes, are raised. They are a source of pure protein; they are easier to care for. And they are more environmentally friendly, let's put it that way, in this respect. There are also other planets where this issue is also resolved, if they are predators or an omnivorous race, like you; there are such in space. There are different types of nutrition. If they feed on animal protein, sometimes they solve this issue like this: they grow, by cloning, the animal itself – the animal's body, but without those vital organs through which the soul could enter.
Am I expressing myself clearly enough?
Dmitry: That is, this is an alternative method of obtaining; it turns out to be possible for you?
Irina (MidgasKaus): Yes, especially on those planets where, for example, there is little area, where many living beings live, who already lack space, and so on. They consider it uneconomical – to eat like ancestors, to eat the meat of animals that, for example, occupy large areas. Therefore, they believe that precisely these laboratories, where you can grow such cloned meat, without the entry of an animal soul, namely by creating cell clones, are the best solution.
That is, there is simply an etheric matrix there, which is also created by plasmoids. Without it, there will be no cell division, you understand, without this life force. And the body itself does not need any special care, like your animals, which need pastures or land where food is grown for them. The fact is that this "animal body" can be fed with special solutions or even gases, that is, by diffusion. And, by the way, this laboratory can easily be set up in space, in orbit. It is not necessary to waste surface area for this. Do you understand what I'm talking about?
And there are races that have kept for themselves the possibility of still eating meat from more traditional animals. It is believed that the souls that enter these animal bodies also have, one might say, some effect on their health. They also have contacts with plasmoids, when precisely the soul that grows this body brings some benefit to these beings.
But even in this case, if the race continues to eat in the traditional way, like their ancestors who ate animal meat, but if this race is technologically advanced and they have already reached the creation of bio-robots, then, naturally, all that I know create special bio-robots for raising animals and their slaughter according to special programs. And they themselves simply consume the product. Since those races that have technologically reached this limit believe that they should engage in something more, not that "lighter," but more high-vibrational and useful for spiritual development than agricultural activity.
By the way, often other types of work on growing food, for example, plant food, collecting this food, and cooking, are automated on these planets.
1:40:47 The correct attitude towards raising animals for slaughter.
Dmitry: Okay. But we haven't heard an opinion about the actual process of obtaining meat by killing.
Irina (MidgasKaus): This, again, I was just answering about other planets where this is possible.
(Irina) And now we move to talking about Earth, where such technology does not exist. Do I understand correctly?
Dmitry: Yes, let's talk about Earth then.
Irina: Because he talked about planets we are still far from: we have neither robots nor any cloned bodies. And this is the reality that must be reckoned with. The cloned meat that earthlings invented, it exists, but its quality is completely inadequate in any way – neither its taste, nor its protein composition, etc., correspond to the natural product. By the way, given the quite high prices for it. Those who have tried it know.
And so, we are now talking about reality, about the fact that we are currently raising farm animals for slaughter for meat. If this happens, since we are omnivorous beings, what should we strive for in this case, if we want to continue eating meat, so that it is environmentally friendly and, one might say, safe in terms of spiritual vibrations?
(MidgasKaus) Firstly, your attitude towards the animal you are raising for your food, during its life, is very important. Namely, how do you treat it: simply as a carrier of calories, proteins, fats, and so on, which feels nothing? And therefore, you treat it cruelly at the moment when it is precisely where you are raising it. This applies, again, to the person who does this themselves, naturally, not to those who buy the finished product. To those who are engaged in the production of these animal products.
So that this does not affect their vibrations, they need to treat these animals as living souls, whose purpose is to give their body, as they say, for your nourishment. You need to understand that the plasmoids that incarnated souls into these bodies also understand this perfectly. They perfectly understand for what purpose these animal cubs are born. Plasmoids, unlike animals, are quite intelligent Spirits. They perfectly understand what kind of animal species it is. But if its purpose is such, this does not mean at all that it is necessary to treat it without Love, precisely at the time when it is in your care.
If you send it Love and take care of it, that is, satisfy its needs for warmth, food, water, care, treatment of diseases, and affection, that is, treat it kindly, not roughly, then its soul will be grateful to you. And the meat it gives you (that is, its flesh) will be of better quality, let's put it that way, that is, it will affect your health in a more favorable way. It will be nourished, so to speak, with high vibrations.
If this animal lived in pain, fear, humiliation, anger, etc., then it lowers its vibrations. You lower the vibrations of this soul, and it already lowers the vibrations of its flesh, which, when consumed by you, if you do not possess sufficiently high vibrations to neutralize it, can negatively affect your etheric body.
1:45:57 How to properly consume meat?
Irina: But, of course, you might then ask: "I personally do not raise these animals and cannot guarantee how others treated them; I buy this in the store. How can I guarantee whether they were loved there, and what vibrations these animal souls received from people?" I repeat to you once more – if you bought this, but did not grow this product yourself, simply bought someone's flesh, it still had a soul. Whatever vibrations it left with, it has already left.
In order not to harm yourself, as I already said in the first part of the answer, you need to, and this is enough, thank God – this already raises the vibrations, as I said, of this food – and thank this soul.
For example, on Esler, they believe that it is important to thank the soul, regardless of its species belonging to the animal or plant kingdom. That is, in any case, thank it. And even if it received low vibrations and suffered during its life, when it was raised for meat and brutally slaughtered, not knowing how to do it (perhaps it was done by an inexperienced person, or they deliberately took out their anger on it, scared it, caused it pain), then this Light of your Love, which you send it, will help: "I send the Light of my Love to this soul and to all plasmoids, the subtle-material entities that created it."
Since this dish made from its flesh will lie before you, it will feel this in the Spiritual world. I remind you: distance does not exist, my dears. Therefore, this will heal its spiritual wounds received as a result of such treatment, and it will calm down at the level where it was. That is, one could say, if you consciously, with Love, send it your high vibrations and calm it down, then the sacrifice it made for people was not in vain.
1:48:38 Correct methods of slaughtering animals for meat.
Irina (Archangel Raphael and MidgasKaus): As for slaughter methods, what can we say here? We address people who are engaged in this.
Naturally, it is necessary to strive for this to be safe for the animal's soul, so that it does not then spend a long time gathering its energies in the astral world with the help of plasmoids, but adapts in the astral world as quickly as possible. Because even if this is its last life in a body, some time will still pass until the soul dissolves in the Astral. And if this is not its last incarnation, then some time will pass until its new incarnation. But in any case, it will spend some time in the Astral.
So that it spends this time not in suffering, not wasting a large amount of time (its personal, subjective) on gathering its energies, which scattered due to its fears – of course, plasmoids will help it with this, but to avoid this, it is necessary, if possible, to slaughter the animal, deprive it of life, of consciousness, in the fastest, most painless way possible. It is desirable that the animal itself does not suspect your intentions, so that it does not experience fear, pain, and so on. Then the soul will quickly separate from the body.
For example, there are different methods for different animals. Nevertheless, if you deprive the animal of consciousness, and it separates from the body, then it gathers quite quickly again in the Astral, where plasmoids meet it and direct it to the world appropriate for that soul.
Regarding rituals. You may ask: is it necessary to read some special addresses before slaughter, as ancient hunters did? We are now talking about hunting; ancient hunters, by the way, knew this peculiarity of animal souls, and they even asked forgiveness from the soul of a particular animal and even asked it to come out to meet them, which, by the way, often happened. Yes, indeed, their hunting was more successful, as plasmoids controlled this.
Therefore, you can immediately before this action, address the soul of the animal with wishes for light, favorable incarnations and the direction of the Light of Love. This can be done before slaughter. But again, this is not the main thing. The main thing is that you, as quickly and painlessly as possible, if possible, deprive this animal of consciousness if you are slaughtering it. But if you do not know how to do it, or if you realize that it didn't work out, for example, you wounded the animal and it is suffering, naturally, you should finish this action as quickly as possible, not letting it suffer – slaughter it completely, and not leave it to suffer or torment.
And then, afterwards, it is necessary, firstly, to forgive yourself for this. Yes, such a mistake happened. Your feeling of guilt here will not change anything; only a conversation with the soul of this animal will change it. You can imagine it, and here you need to ask forgiveness for this carelessness and send it the Light of your Love.
But this, again, I say for those who have a desire not to lower their vibrations from this action. Yes, it's possible this way. After all, ancient priests, who prayed to God and also raised their vibrations and their spiritual level, could even sacrifice animals to their gods, but at the same time they observed special rules. Now they are simply forgotten. Well, how forgotten... they are not forgotten in those families where this is done from generation to generation. These rules are passed on, so to speak, from fathers to sons, figuratively speaking. Only modern people who do not engage in this have already forgotten them, but earlier it was known to everyone.
But this rule is for those who do this themselves. If you bought meat, didn't kill anyone yourself, then you are in no way responsible for the fact that it was killed with suffering. This is the responsibility of the person who did it due to their carelessness or for some other reason. Your job, as I already said, is in any case – directing the Light of Love and gratitude, which will calm this soul.
(Irina) This is, I think, a sufficiently detailed answer? I don't know.
Dmitry: Yes.
1:54:56 MidgasKaus on the ecological situation on Earth.
Dmitry: The next question: how do you feel about the ecological situation on Earth? Do you think this situation needs some improvement, or is everything going as it should?
Irina (MidgasKaus): The ecological situation on Earth remains quite tense. There are several problems with pollution of the Earth's atmosphere, soil pollution, pollution of the world's oceans with various substances, and not only with carbon dioxide.
Of great importance is the pollution, for example, of large areas of land with various pesticides, herbicides, and other substances used to protect plants from various pests. All this then goes into the ground and affects the bacteria in the soil. It can also accumulate in plants and be harmful to people. All this can also enter the world's oceans with runoff and, accordingly, poison fish and other marine animals.
Also important is the pollution of the atmosphere with combustion products of petroleum products, for example, etc., which contain sulfur oxides, which, when combined with moisture in the air, form sulfuric acid. That is, some harmful acids are formed, which then, during precipitation, fall on the ground, on plants, causing them various diseases and harming the soil, that is, soil microorganisms. This is another problem.
Well, and, naturally, this is the problem with carbon dioxide, when the planet produces a large amount of carbon dioxide due to many cars, factories, and so on. They all use the combustion reaction, that is, the combination of a substance with oxygen with the release of carbon dioxide. All this is produced on a very large scale, larger than your plants can process.
By the way, I will tell you now that not only trees can process carbon dioxide, which causes the greenhouse effect and, accordingly, heating of the planet. This problem also exists for you, it's still ongoing: entire areas in the ocean are sometimes covered with algae.
(Irina) Now he is showing such a green film, but it's not a film, it's like threads. Here they are, large areas of these algae can also process carbon dioxide into oxygen, because they contain chlorophyll.
(MidgasKaus) There is also the cutting down of your forests. Moreover, not just cutting down; there is a problem when people do not care about the cleanliness of forests, and piles of already fallen trees create a fire hazard. As you know, fires can occur because people living nearby created such a situation and cannot cope with the problem by clearing the forest, so that there is no reason for the fire to spread.
There is also the problem of nuclear waste from your nuclear power plants, where you produce electricity. You have a fairly large problem of where to store their waste, which still emits radiation, but is no longer suitable for use as an energy carrier. How to solve this problem? Your scientists already have ideas, hints on how to extract energy and make these substances harmless (this energy is extracted with special reagents). But on an industrial scale, this is not yet possible due to the lack of infrastructure needed to create such processing plants. But gradually your scientists are creating new ideas, and we hope this problem will be resolved soon.
There is also a problem of high intensity of mining. Moreover, this is connected both with pollution of the area around mining with various wastes, and with the extraction of large amounts of hydrocarbons, oil, gas from the deep layers of the earth, where they are located. The layers of the earth form a certain structure, and they can shift, causing collapses not only on the earth, but also inside the earth. The structure in the depth of the earth's crust is disrupted, and this can cause collapses there and the approach to the surface of this lava that comes from inside the Earth, that is, hot magma. Which in turn can cause earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and so on.
(Irina) That is, it also harms the ecology – the extraction of minerals in large quantities. These are the ecological problems he named for me now.
(MidgasKaus) But the most important ecological problem is still connected with the pollution of the noosphere, that is, the sphere of reason, the sphere of your egregors. On any planet of intelligent beings, there are egregors as accumulations of identical thoughts, thought-forms, and feelings. And these egregors can be light or dark. And if there are many dark egregors, it is very difficult for light beings to live on this planet; everything will resist their efforts to go towards the Light.
2:02:57 The path to a perfect society. Overcoming aggression.
Dmitry: Then the next question, one of the last. In ufology, contacteeism, and channeling, highly developed alien civilizations are presented as having achieved technical and spiritual perfection, a happy life without suffering, one's own or others'. What steps, in your opinion, should humanity, that is, the inhabitants of Earth, take to achieve the same state?
Irina (Archangel Raphael): Give up aggression. Firstly, in order to give up aggression, it is necessary to recognize the right to life of any person. Any person is similar to you in inner content – in the sense of the desire to live. If you want to live, then any person also wants to live. It is necessary to recognize their right to life and to development in the Light, to recognize the right of any person to fulfill their necessary needs, physical and spiritual. This is also a manifestation of Love. One of the needs is the need to live. Recognition of the right to life must be in relation to absolutely any person, whatever their beliefs, whatever their gender, race, or religion.
Also, there must be the right to life regardless of age. Even if a person is not yet born, they already exist, they are already alive, simply growing, developing, in order to be ready for this world. If you take away their life, they will never be born (in this body, naturally, we mean now). That means this life of theirs, for which they were preparing, will not take place, and all their energy will be wasted – all their energy, which they directed towards developing this incarnation plan. Therefore, the absence of aggression in the form of depriving a person of life is necessary – naturally, the cessation of wars, the abolition of abortions, the death penalty.
If a criminal has committed some very terrible crime, this indicates that they have descended into low vibrations. If you deprive them of life, you deprive this Spirit of the opportunity to realize this and raise its vibrations. Such a thing causes only one decision among the mentors: if the Spirit did not pass its lesson in this world and lowered its vibrations, there is a very high probability that it will be born again in your same world, already in a small child, with all its non-acceptance and anger against this world, which did not accept it and deprived it of life. That is, this Spirit of a person executed for some terrible crime will return again, but with more negativity, more evil than even at the moment of committing the crime.
Yes, even this is possible. Therefore, these criminals need help to raise their vibrations. What can this help consist of? Naturally, in isolating them from society until they raise their vibrations. Because if they do not know how to cope with their emotions, with their evil, with their evil feelings, they will not be able to control themselves and with the next crime will lower their vibrations even more. To prevent this from happening, it is necessary to isolate them and work with them in terms of explaining the spiritual cause of their condition and mandatory education about the Spiritual world and the rules of working with the Higher Self.
2:08:05 The path to a perfect society: justice and non-acquisitiveness, dialogue between power and people.
Irina (Archangel Raphael): The second is respect for life, respect for society. Respect is a form of Love. For your society to be perfect, it is necessary for everyone who is responsible for its development, and these are your legislators and people responsible for implementing laws, to start with themselves, with restoring the path to the Light. If they want to lead your society to perfection, they themselves must become this perfection, they themselves must understand that this perfection is in Love.
That is, their work for the benefit of society should not be directed at their personal gain. The gain that they receive in the form of various benefits is only the possibilities of the Universe, which are given for greater achievements for the benefit of society. If they rule over society, not paying attention to its needs, they themselves will deprive this society of the opportunity to support itself. It will simply become exhausted and fall into decay.
The next point of perfection is dialogue between power structures and the entire people, dialogue about common development, dialogue with mutual respect and recognition of the rights to life, to development, to the satisfaction of everyone's needs. And both sides must be interested in this dialogue, and not in accusing each other and fruitless suspicions.
2:10:27 The path to a perfect society. Recognition of the Spiritual world and spiritual education of children.
Irina (Archangel Raphael): Well, and finally, this is, naturally, a conscious attitude towards the Spiritual world, recognition of its existence independently of the material world. Because materialism acts in an oppressive way on the Spirit, as it does not presuppose an eternal goal beyond this life, and therefore causes an unwillingness to somehow develop spiritually for subsequent incarnations and for merging with God altogether. The meaning of life can easily be lost in this case.
Another sign of a conscious, perfect society is when small children in school educational institutions are told about themselves as spiritual beings, about their ability to connect with their Spirit. And, naturally, they are told about how to properly lead adult life, how to start a family, how to bear children, how to raise them, and so on. And also how to work with one's feelings, how to work with one's instincts, how to transform negativity into positivity. That is, a sign of a conscious society is the desire to raise conscious children, which is already introduced into the school curriculum.
2:12:31 The path to a perfect society. Striving for unity.
Irina (Archangel Raphael): And, naturally, it is the desire to help each other, to unite. I am not even talking now about the unity of all countries, about erasing all borders – I perfectly understand that this is very difficult to do, because there are different languages, different cultural traditions. I am now talking about spiritual unity, when, despite the presence of borders and different languages, different religions, different skin colors, people feel their unity in the main thing – that you are all children of God, and you all live on this planet, which is given to you by God as an opportunity to become happy.
If you turn this opportunity into an opportunity to become unhappy, God the Father, of course, will accept even such your choice, you have every right to it. But it will be your own unhappiness into which you plunge yourself; it will be your own non-love. After all, your Heavenly Father is Love; He does not wish such a fate for you, but He will not forbid you to have it if you want to go through this experience.
Dmitry: Okay.
2:14:06 Diversity of forms of political unity in the IS?
Dmitry: The next question, the penultimate one, just concerns what you have just touched upon. Do you think that if humanity takes these steps, the unification of all people on Earth under a common idea is possible?
Irina (Archangel Raphael): Under a common idea? Yes, it is possible. But this may not be accompanied by unification at the level of countries. Countries may remain different. There are civilizations in the Interstellar Union where there is a single state, and there are planets in the Interstellar Union (and in the Galactic Federation of Light too) that unite different states. There are even planets in the Interstellar Union where there is a monarchy, the transfer of power by inheritance. But, nevertheless, they have overcome their contradictions in society, and they follow the laws of the Interstellar Union, and are in it. That is, some political or economic form of management – it does not have such great importance as the inner spiritual content.
2:15:29 Advice for those wishing to become contactees.
Dmitry: And the last question for today. What advice can you give to those who want to become a contactee? What needs to be done to avoid distorting the transmitted information?
Irina (Archangel Raphael and MidgasKaus): Firstly, to those who want to become a contactee, we would still like to recommend reading literature of spiritual, esoteric, scientific content, to raise their cultural and educational level, to expand their vocabulary. The more words and expressions in the contactee's memory, the easier it is to transmit information through them, and the less distorted it is transmitted. We always recommend to our contactees, besides direct contacts, to study spiritual traditions, read books, perform various practices, and be sure to communicate with their Higher Self.
And, of course, the main thing is to be a person who strives for the Light, who strives for Love, who is willing to listen to any person, to help them, and not to accuse them. Who is devoid of fears – not those that are natural according to the instinct of self-preservation, such as, for example, the fear of some dangerous places where harm could be caused to the body or where exit from incarnation could occur. These are natural fears; they leave the field after the dangerous situations are eliminated. We are now talking about other fears that are not justified by anything other than one's own mental attitude.
Such fears are, by and large, incompatible with contacteeism, because it is difficult to work with a contactee who does not trust their curator, who is even more afraid of them – of some of their actions, suspects them of something. In this case, information can also be distorted. And it is difficult to be around them, because their vibrations are incompatible. Their unpleasant feelings – distrust, doubt, suspicion, and so on – they cause the closing of the heart center and generate such vibrations. And in the Astral, this is felt (conveys this sensation) as a special kind of current, like electricity, incompatible with them, and it is unpleasant for them to be around. Because the curator finds fear, anger, irritation unpleasant.
If the curator is themselves in high vibrations, in Love (they are very subtle-feeling beings), then being next to a being that, for example, is angry or furious, could be similar to you standing next to a friend, and he, for example, picks a nettle and hits you on your bare hand. You might have such a sensation. You would say: "What?! What are you doing?!" And you would be very surprised; it wouldn't be so much pain as surprise. That's roughly the feeling that arises.
That is, the absence of unfounded fears, anger, aggression, constant work on oneself, on one's blocks, and work with one's Higher Self. Cleansing oneself from blocks, if they appear, working on one's mental attitudes. We always teach contactees: if you see a person or a situation that you do not accept, which causes you some internal dissatisfaction, always look at the reason that caused the appearance of such a feeling in your Soul. That is, to analyze your emotions.
Dmitry: Thank you very much for giving such an interview! Thank you very much!
2:20:45 End of video.
November 6, 2025
Conference participants:
Irina Podzorova – contactee with extraterrestrial civilizations, with subtle-material civilizations, and with the Spiritual world;
Dmitry – host of the broadcast;
MidgasKaus – representative of the planet Esler, biologist, psychologist, microbiologist, specialist in extraterrestrial life forms;
Archangel Raphael – chief curator of the healing systems of the Milky Way galaxy, guardian of the esoteric egregor of Earth, patron of healers, energy practitioners, and doctors.
